17
New Frontier Discovery February 2010 1 ational Aeronautics and Space Administration Donna Patterson, Digital Fusion D&NF Business Manager Project Management Challenge 2011 Discovery and New Frontiers Project Budget Report Process sed with permission

Patterson.donna

  • Upload
    nasapmc

  • View
    12.813

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

1February 2010

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Donna Patterson, Digital Fusion

D&NF Business Manager

Project Management Challenge2011

Discovery and New Frontiers Project Budget Report Process

Used with permission

Page 2: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

Programs Overview

2

• Uncoupled program addressing high-priority science objectives in solar system exploration• Frequent opportunities for science community to propose full investigations• Fixed-price cost cap (cradle to grave), excluding the launch vehicle• Full and open competition• Principal Investigator-led project

• Established in 1992• $425M cap per mission (FY09)• Mission opportunities every 18 to 24 mos• Open science competition for all solar

system objects, except for the Earth and the Sun

• Established in 2003• $625M cap per mission (FY10)• Mission opportunities every 42 to 52

mos• Addresses high-priority investigations

identified by the National Academy of SciencesFebruary 2010

Page 3: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

October 23, 2007 3

Juno

Mars Pathfinder

CONTOUR

ASPERA-3 on Mars Express

D&NF Science Mission Targets

– The Moon (Lunar Prospector, M3, GRAIL)

– Mars (Mars Pathfinder, ASPERA-3)

– Inner Planets (MESSENGER, Strofio)

– Outer Planets (New Horizons, Juno)

– Comets (CONTOUR, Stardust, Deep Impact, EPOXI, NExT)

– Asteroids (NEAR, Dawn)

– Interplanetary Space (Genesis)

– Extra-Solar System (Kepler)

Dawn

Genesis

Stardust

MESSENGER

NEAR

M3 on Chadrayaan-1

New Horizons

Kepler

GRAIL

Lunar Prospector

Strofio on BepiColombo

Page 4: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

4

Project Life Cycle

February 2010

AO Development

Step 1 Step 2

Phase A Phase B(Preliminary Design)

Phase C(Detailed Design)

Phase D(Development)

Phase E(Operations & Data

Analysis)

Formulation Implementation

Draft AO Release

Science/Mission Selection led by SMD Program Implementation led by Discovery Program Office

AO Development AO Implementation

Step 1 Step 2

Phase A(ConceptStudies)

Phase C(Detailed Design)

Phase D(Development)

Phase E(Operations & Data

Analysis)

Formulation Implementation

CR

Competitive Selection

Science/Mission Selection led by SMD

KDP A

KDP B KDP C KDP D KDP E KDP F

CSR Evaluation

CSR

Final AO Release

Phase B(Preliminary Design)

Program Implementation led by D&NF Program Office

Initial Cost Proposal

Final Cost Proposal

Project Confirmed Cost

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

AnnualPPBE Submit

Page 5: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

Program Organization

Phase B, C, D, E

Confirmation Review at end of Phase B

Decision Authority makes confirmation decision

PM becomes heavily engaged following selection

D&NFProgram Director

Mission Program Scientist

D&NFProgram Manager

Principal Investigators

Programmatic Reporting& Accountability

Scientific Reporting& Accountability

NASA Headquarters

MissionProgram Executive

Lead Program

Scientist

Project Manager(Implementing Organization)

NASA Ctr. CMC or Appointed Board

Program Office

Projects

LeadProgram Executive

Mission Manager

Associate Administrator for the

Science Mission Directorate (SMD)Governing PMC

Page 6: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

6

Budget Process: Interfaces and Interactions

February 2010

Responsibilities

• Provide Monthly Reports• Identify liens and threats• Identify reserves• Identify workforce• Submit PPBE input• Track project cost agreements• Report cost agreement changes• Monitor project performance against total cost• Prepare 533s or enter IEMP data, if applicable

Responsibilities• Track all project funding and cost• Provide monthly budget performance presentations to HQ, PO, MSFC CFO • Request fund transfer within Program implementation budget• Develop detailed Program, Planning, Budgeting and Evaluation (PPBE) Plans and Operating Plans for the Program, integrate for projects• Monitor MSFC contracts, including 533M input• Integrate 533/IEMP data and monthly reports• Maintain PBRs

Responsibilities

• Advocate/justify program and budget• Execute funds consistent

with Operating Plan, appropriation actions, and law• Transfer approved budgeted funds• Administer HQ held futures and other program-level budgets• Review/revise recommended budget

Project Offices

Program Office

Headquarters

533s or IEMP data

Implementation budget request,Project requests

(PPBE)PPBE input info

Monthly reportsMonthly report roll-up

Budget drill actions

Budget drill responses

Budget and Operating Plan

guidelinesNotify of funding

authorization

Funding transfer notice

Coordinate funding transfers (PRs)

Operating Plan

Implementing Organizations(Project Related)

Responsibilities• Input IEMP data

Fun

ding

PP

BE

Inp

ut

Fun

ding

Aut

horiz

atio

n N

otic

e

Implementing Organizations(Non-project Related)

Responsibilities• Input IEMP data

Cos

t Pha

sing

Pla

ns Fun

ding

PP

BE

Inpu

t

Maintain PBRs Maintain PBRs

Page 7: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

7

Project Budget Report Process Motivation

February 2010

• Due to the timing of official budgetary documents, budget changes inevitably occur up to the printing of the Program Resource Guidance (PRG)

• Preparing the Program Planning Budget Execution (PPBE) and other budget submits in this environment can be a complex, time-consuming, and a frustrating activity

– Reconciling the project budget history at the program and project levels– Identifying and correcting errors– Ensuring 100% confidence in each project budget

• Additionally, the lack of clear, complete trace of project budget changes hinders program office ability to study project cost increases

– Understanding the drivers behind cost increases– Tracing the effects of NASA process changes on life cycle cost

Solution: Project Budget Report (PBR) and Quarterly Budget Status (QBS) processes

Page 8: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

8

Project Budget Report (1 of 3)

February 2010

• Used to document and communicate each project’s funding profile and adjustments over the life of the project− Created and maintained by the Program Office (PO)− Distributed by the PO to Headquarters (HQ) and projects− A budget tracking tool, not a funding authorization by NASA

• PBR serves as an acknowledgement of the approved project new obligation authority (NOA) profile and any adjustments made to the profile− Issued at the beginning of each fiscal year and revised throughout the year to

capture all funding changes− Supporting documentation referenced− Explanatory comments included to provide understanding and traceability− Has played a major role in helping to prevent budget and funding misunderstandings

and errors− Signed by the Principal Investigator (when applicable), Project Manager, Program

Manager, and Program Director at the beginning of each FY and after a project re-plan or major funding adjustment

• Documents a project’s life cycle cost by fiscal year, phase, and implementing organizations

Page 9: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

9

Project A Project AFY 2010 FY 2010

CTR: PROJECT #: PLRA: ANALYST: UPN: REV: 1

PHONE: DATE: 5/4/2010CURRENT APPROVED PROJECT LIFE CYCLE COST PROFILE FY2010

TOTAL BASELINE$K FY2009 Total Prior FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 BTC LCC COST CAP

TOTAL PROJECT 260,059.000 485,848.000 237,173.000 152,768.000 21,424.000 14,381.000 17,800.000 18,080.000 17,839.000 84,687.000 1,050,000.000 1,050,000.000

JPL 204,987.886 397,434.743 168,728.331 68,048.000 21,424.000 8,053.000 11,820.000 12,102.000 11,286.000 40,236.000 739,132.074GSFC 2,251.764 5,174.764 4,287.236 715.000 138.000 478.000 486.000 590.000 2,665.000 14,534.000KSC 46,000.000 51,600.000 59,400.000 79,400.000 190,400.000

MSFC/SwRI 6,725.000 31,500.943 4,668.000 4,605.000 6,190.000 5,502.000 5,492.000 5,963.000 41,786.000 105,706.943JSC 43.200 43.200

MSFC 94.350 94.350 89.433 183.783FUNDING PROFILE DESCRIPTION / EXPLANATION:

1st QTR FUNDING PROFILE ADJUSTMENT #1TOTAL

Center FY2009 Total Prior FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 BTC ADJUSTMENTTOTAL ADJ

JPL (5.000) (5.000) 4200316052APL 5.000 5.000 4200317845

Adjustment #1 Explanation:Transfer $5K to APL to set up Government Bill of Lading (GBL) account.

2nd QTR FUNDING PROFILE ADJUSTMENT #1TOTAL

Center FY2009 Total Prior FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 BTC ADJUSTMENTTOTAL ADJ

JPL 4,186.000 (1,000.000) 3,186.000 GSFC 214.000 214.000 KSC (4,400.000) 1,000.000 (3,400.000)

Adjustment #1 Explanation:

ADJUSTED PROJECT LIFE CYCLE COST (NOA) PROFILE FY2010

TOTAL BASELINE$K FY2009 Total Prior FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 BTC LCC COST CAP

TOTAL PROJECT 260,059.000 485,848.000 237,173.000 152,768.000 21,424.000 14,381.000 17,800.000 18,080.000 17,839.000 84,687.000 1,050,000.000 1,050,000.000

JPL 204,987.886 397,434.743 172,909.331 67,048.000 21,424.000 8,053.000 11,820.000 12,102.000 11,286.000 40,236.000 742,313.074GSFC 2,251.764 5,174.764 4,501.236 715.000 138.000 478.000 486.000 590.000 2,665.000 14,748.000KSC 46,000.000 51,600.000 55,000.000 80,400.000 187,000.000

MSFC/SwRI 6,725.000 31,500.943 4,668.000 4,605.000 6,190.000 5,502.000 5,492.000 5,963.000 41,786.000 105,706.943JSC 43.200 43.200

MSFC 94.350 94.350 89.433 183.783APL 5.000 5.000

FUNDING PROFILE DESCRIPTION / EXPLANATION:As per KDP-C decision and memorandum, the project management (internal to NASA) approved LCC is $1050M, while the Agency/MD externally reported LCC is $1107M.

The Agency/MD externally reported $1107M includes $57M for the IPAO 70% Cost Confidence Level, which is reported under the Unallocated Future Expenses (UFE) budget line, andto be managed by HQ/SMD. The $57M for UFE is neither managed by nor made available to the project without prior approval from either the DPMC or the APMC.

Phase E

NEW FRONTIERS PROGRAM

ADJUSTED PROJECT BUDGET REPORTJPL

Jane Doe

PR#

PR#

Phase E

Phase E

Phase EPhase C/D Phase C/D

Phase C/D

112233132-46. 678-90

Phase C/D

Phase C/D Phase C/D

(256) 961-0000

FY10 KSC funding decrease in the amount of $4.4M due to $3.4M LV price reduction, plus a $1.0M loan to be paid back from JPL in FY11. Out of the $4.4M total transfer, $214K will go to GSFC for the addition of an instrument manager and the balance of $4.186M will go to JPL to help replenish the reserve profile.

Phase C/D Phase C/D

Project Budget Report (2 of 3)

February 2010

EXAMPLE

Page 10: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

10

Project Budget Report (3 of 3)

February 2010

FY2010 MILESTONE SCHEDULE

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR DATE PROGRAM MANAGER DATE

PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROGRAM DIRECTOR DATE

1) Juno project profile as reflected above as the Approved LCC profile does not include $107K of funding re-routed to Juno from DSN for CFDP software compliance. Juno received this funding in FY2007.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

JUNO Top Level Schedule

Phase B (33 mths) Phase C (20 mths) Phase D (16 mths) Phase E (thru 10/2018)

11/28ATP

10/24CRR

5/21PMSR

5/12PDR/NAR

7/15

CR

8/5KDP-C IBR

2/33/4

SIR4/1KDP-D

8/31ERR 3/2

PSR8/4LRR

10/4PLAR

4/20

CDR 9/28Deep Space Maneuver7/7FRR

SYSTEM ENG Requirements 1/19BL-L2 PSRD

5/1P-L2 PSRD

8/30F-L2 PSRD

V&V Plan (F)FS/LV ICD (F) EPDT Plan (F) JOISRLSR p2 PP Pre-Launch Rpt (F)

7/1 Flight Instr Req'd for Inst'l

PAYLOAD Requirements & Preliminary Design Refer to Payload Schedule for Details

FLIGHT SYSTEM

Requirements/Trades/Analysis & Risk Reduction Preliminary Design Detail Design

2/19 2/26 PDDU ATU

PIU Flight Box

POWERPDDU

Design/Procurements Fabrication Assy & Test 3

FT Wing#2

#1Solar Cell Testing/LL Proc 2/11 1/26 9/4

C&DH EDU#1

7/19C&DH BC&DH

CCA IRAD Dev/EGSE Cap Dev EDU Dev Assembly & Test ATU #1 #2 C&DH A8/17

2/4 1/21 7/6 Vault Pnl to JPLTELECOM

SDST Proc Preliminary Design/LL Proc Detailed Design Fabricate & Test4/9

2/25 2/10 LEGEND:MECHANICAL &STRUCTURES

Configuration Trades Design Dev / Fab & Assy Test Vault4/5

= PDR

Struc to Prop = CDR4/28

Prop/Struc = Payload Del'y

3/5 2/17PROPULSION = Funded Margin

Preliminary Design/LL Proc Design Procure Tanks, Main Engine & REMs= Critical Path

Prop/Struc Integ = Milestone

SRU RFP SRU Study Contract SRU PDRs 5/13 3/5 = Complete MilestoneGN&C

SRU LL Procurement Fab Material SRU Assy & Test8/31

IMU/SUN Procure 4/22

FLIGHT SOFTWARE#1 AAC

3/17GIF CMIC #0

3/2#3 #4 #4.1#5 #6

IRAD Board & Box SW FSW Development FSW Builds

TESTBEDS S/C Emulators (Plyd Dels)1st SCE Del Final SCE Del

3/4

STL#1

STL Cert#2 #2 #1

4/1 7/1Instruments to ATLO

8/5LAUNCHASSY, TEST &

LAUNCH OPS 3/11 SS I&T Pld Env Test Sys

Launch Ops Launch Period (8/5-8/26)

3/24MDNav

7/14MOS

2/19MDNav

9/15MOS

6/7 ORR 10/13

MS PR3/22

Ops Cncpt4/27L3 K&D

Training

MISSION SYSTEM Trade Studies Requirements10/5

P-L3 3/24F-L3 MD/NAV

7/14F-L3/P-L4 MOS

7/27F-L4

#3 #3.17/28

3.2 #4 ATLO Del #5 #6 Launch Del

Ground Data System Engineering GDS SW Development #7 Contingency

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

JUNO Top Level Schedule

Phase B (33 mths) Phase C (20 mths) Phase D (16 mths) Phase E (thru 10/2018)

11/28ATP

10/24CRR

5/21PMSR

5/12PDR/NAR

7/15

CR

8/5KDP-C IBR

2/33/4

SIR4/1KDP-D

8/31ERR 3/2

PSR8/4LRR

10/4PLAR

4/20

CDR 9/28Deep Space Maneuver7/7FRR

SYSTEM ENG Requirements 1/19BL-L2 PSRD

5/1P-L2 PSRD

8/30F-L2 PSRD

V&V Plan (F)FS/LV ICD (F) EPDT Plan (F) JOISRLSR p2 PP Pre-Launch Rpt (F)

7/1 Flight Instr Req'd for Inst'l

PAYLOAD Requirements & Preliminary Design Refer to Payload Schedule for Details

FLIGHT SYSTEM

Requirements/Trades/Analysis & Risk Reduction Preliminary Design Detail Design

2/19 2/26 PDDU ATU

PIU Flight Box

POWERPDDU

Design/Procurements Fabrication Assy & Test 3

FT Wing#2

#1Solar Cell Testing/LL Proc 2/11 1/26 9/4

C&DH EDU#1

7/19C&DH BC&DH

CCA IRAD Dev/EGSE Cap Dev EDU Dev Assembly & Test ATU #1 #2 C&DH A8/17

2/4 1/21 7/6 Vault Pnl to JPLTELECOM

SDST Proc Preliminary Design/LL Proc Detailed Design Fabricate & Test4/9

2/25 2/10 LEGEND:MECHANICAL &STRUCTURES

Configuration Trades Design Dev / Fab & Assy Test Vault4/5

= PDR

Struc to Prop = CDR4/28

Prop/Struc = Payload Del'y

3/5 2/17PROPULSION = Funded Margin

Preliminary Design/LL Proc Design Procure Tanks, Main Engine & REMs= Critical Path

Prop/Struc Integ = Milestone

SRU RFP SRU Study Contract SRU PDRs 5/13 3/5 = Complete MilestoneGN&C

SRU LL Procurement Fab Material SRU Assy & Test8/31

IMU/SUN Procure 4/22

FLIGHT SOFTWARE#1 AAC

3/17GIF CMIC #0

3/2#3 #4 #4.1#5 #6

IRAD Board & Box SW FSW Development FSW Builds

TESTBEDS S/C Emulators (Plyd Dels)1st SCE Del Final SCE Del

3/4

STL#1

STL Cert#2 #2 #1

4/1 7/1Instruments to ATLO

8/5LAUNCHASSY, TEST &

LAUNCH OPS 3/11 SS I&T Pld Env Test Sys

Launch Ops Launch Period (8/5-8/26)

3/24MDNav

7/14MOS

2/19MDNav

9/15MOS

6/7 ORR 10/13

MS PR3/22

Ops Cncpt4/27L3 K&D

Training

MISSION SYSTEM Trade Studies Requirements10/5

P-L3 3/24F-L3 MD/NAV

7/14F-L3/P-L4 MOS

7/27F-L4

#3 #3.17/28

3.2#4 ATLO Del #5 #6 Launch Del

Ground Data System Engineering GDS SW Development #7 Contingency

EXAMPLE

Page 11: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

Project Phase C/D: Fiscal Year 2010

Example:

1st Qtr Jan JulApr2nd Qtr 4th Qtr3rd QtrOct

2010 Center Funding Re-allocations October - September

2010 Operating Plan October

PPBE2012 Budget Cycle, PRG received from HQ March

PPBE2012 Project over-guide submit April

PBR

Updated

PPBE2012 Final Budget Approval May

Final PBR released for signatures and becomes starting point for FY11

September

PBR

Updated

Budget Profile Changes

Signed

PBR

Major Project Re-plan July

Signed

PBR

Page 12: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

12

Quarterly Budget Status (1 of 3)

February 2010

• Reflects the current fiscal year budget transactions, including any adjustments to the approved NOA and distributions − Reports the current fiscal year only− Reflects NOA, any adjustments, and funding distributions by Center− Reports are distributed to HQ, PO, and Project Manager/Principal Investigator

• Comments are added to fully document the reasoning or purpose of any adjustment to the approved NOA to maintain our understanding of the profile and any changes to the profile over the life of the project

• QBS is not signed; distributed quarterly by the PO

• QBS has improved the tracking and analysis of the current fiscal year funding levels− Reports detail funding transactions for all project partners− QBS (and PBR) creates a funding trace for each project− Provides details of all funding transactions during current FY− Like the PBR, has played a major role in helping to prevent budget and funding

misunderstandings and errors

Page 13: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

13

Project A QUARTERLY BUDGET STATUS (QBS) Project AFY 2010 2nd QUARTER FY 2010

($K) DATE: PROJECT LCC ($K)

237,173.000 PROJECT #: $1,050,000.000237,173.000 ANALYST:

226,379.135 PHONE:10,793.865

-

($K)168,728.331

4,181.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr ADJ # 1 (5.000) Oct FY10 4200316052 2010 SCEX22010D

2nd Qtr ADJ # 1 4,186.000 Jan FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

172,909.331

162,329.466 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr DIST # 3 26,751.764 Oct FY10 4200316052 2010 SCEX22010D

1st Qtr DIST # 4 30,000.000 Nov FY10 4200318506 2010 SCEX22010D1st Qtr DIST # 10 7,419.000 Dec FY10 4200321816 2010 SCEX22010D1st Qtr DIST # 11 976.000 Dec FY10 4200323008 2010 SCEX22010D2nd Qtr DIST # 13 7,600.000 Jan FY10 4200324160 2010 SCEX22010D

2nd Qtr DIST # 15 89,004.879 Jan FY10 4200326295 2010 SCEX22010D2nd Qtr DIST # 20 577.823 Feb FY10 Not Assigned 2010 SCEX22010D

10,579.865

($K)4,287.236

214.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

2nd Qtr ADJ # 1 214.000 Jan FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

4,501.236

4,287.236 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr DIST # 1 2,248.236 Oct FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

1st Qtr DIST # 2 340.000 Nov FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

1st Qtr DIST # 9 450.000 Dec FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

2nd Qtr DIST # 14 1,249.000 Jan FY10 2010 SCEX22010D214.000

Budget Distribution

Budget Distribution

WBS Comments

Budget Distribution

$3.4M LV Price reduction. Transfer $4.186M to JPL (reserves) and

$214K to GSFC for addition of Instrument Manager. JPL to repay $1M in FY11.

WBS Comments

804068.01.01 Budget Distribution

804068.01.01 Transfer $5K to APL to set up Government Bill of Lading (GBL) account.FY10 KSC funding decrease in the amount of $4.4M due to $3.4M LV price reduction, plus a $1.0M loan to be paid back from JPL in FY11.

CommentsWBS

804068.01.01 Budget Distribution

Comments

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTEDTOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

TOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

PBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL PROJECT

PBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL DISTRIBUTED TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED

JPL

WBS

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

5/4/2010

112233Jane Doe

(256) 961-0000

804068.01.01 Budget Distribution

GSFCPBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

Budget DistributionTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED

TOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

804068.01.01804068.01.01 Budget Distribution

Budget Distribution

804068.01.01

804068.01.01

Budget Distribution

Budget Distribution

Quarterly Budget Status (2 of 3)

February 2010

EXAMPLE

Page 14: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

14

Quarterly Budget Status (3 of 3)

February 2010

($K)59,400.000(4,400.000) FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

2nd Qtr ADJ # 1 (4,400.000) Jan FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

55,000.00055,000.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr DIST # 7 14,100.000 Oct FY10 2010 SCEX22010D1st Qtr DIST # 8 4,000.000 Nov FY10 2010 SCEX22010D1st Qtr DIST # 12 4,000.000 Dec FY10 2010 SCEX22010D2nd Qtr DIST # 17 32,900.000 Jan FY10 2010 SCEX22010D

-

($K)4,668.0004,668.0004,668.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

2nd Qtr DIST # 16 997.000 Jan FY10 4200324473 2010 SCEX22010D2nd Qtr DIST # 18 2,964.433 Feb FY10 4200329000 2010 SCEX22010D2nd Qtr DIST # 19 706.567 Feb FY10 4200318902 2010 SCEX22010D

-

($K)89.43389.43389.433 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr DIST # 6 89.433 Oct FY10 2010 SCEX22010D-

($K)

5.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund1st Qtr ADJ # 1 5.000 Oct FY10 4200317845 2010 SCEX22010D

5.0005.000 FY 2010 Month PR Number PY Fund

1st Qtr DIST # 5 5.000 Nov FY10 4200317845 2010 SCEX22010D-

804068.01.04 Budget DistributionWBS Comments

WBS CommentsBudget Distribution

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTEDTOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

804068.04.01 Budget Distribution

WBS Comments

Budget Distribution

WBS CommentsBudget DistributionBudget Distribution

WBS Comments

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

PBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOATOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

MSFC

APL

PBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTEDTOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

TOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

PBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTEDTOTAL FORWARD FUNDING

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

MSFC/SwRI

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOATOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED

QBS FY10 ADJUSTED NOAPBR FY10 ADJUSTED NOA

KSC

Budget Distribution

WBS Comments804068.01.04 Transfer $5K to APL to set up Government Bill of Lading (GBL) account.

$3.4M LV Price reduction. Transfer $4.186M to JPL (reserves) and $214K to GSFC for addition of Instrument Manager. JPL to repay $1M in FY11.

804068.04.01 Budget Distribution804068.04.01 Budget Distribution

EXAMPLE

Page 15: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

15

Project Budget Report Benefits

February 2010

•PBR Documents a project’s life cycle cost by fiscal year, phase, and implementing organizations

•QBS has improved the tracking and analysis of the current fiscal year funding levels

• Together, the PBR and QBS have – Cut the time required to develop the program PPBE budget by more than 50% – Reduced the time required to verify and distribute funds to the project organizations

by 50%– Ensured 100% agreement and confidence in each project budget and the distribution

of funds by both program and project management– Proven to be a valuable record of the project or programmatic budget, facilitating

data mining

The PBR has proven so successful, it is being implemented for other SMD programs

Page 16: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

16February 2010

Supplemental Data and Backup

Page 17: Patterson.donna

New Frontiers

Discovery

17

Acronyms

February 2010

AO Announcement of OpportunityASPERA Analyzer of Space Plasma and Energetic

AtomsCFO Chief Financial Officer CMC Center Management

CouncilCONTOUR Comet Nucleus TOURCR Confirmation ReviewCSR Concept Study ReportD&NF Discovery and New

FrontiersFY Fiscal YearGRAIL Gravity Recovery and

Interior LaboratoryHQ HeadquartersIEMP Integrated Enterprise

Management ProgramKDP Key Decision PointM3 Moon Mineralogy MapperMESSENGER MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment,

Geochemistry, and RangingMSFC Marshall Space Flight

CenterNEAR Near Earth Asteroid

RendezvousNOA New Obligation AuthorityPBR Project Budget ReportPDS Planetary Data SystemPMC Program Management

CouncilPO Program OfficePPBE Program Planning Budget Execution PRG Program Resource GuidancePSD Planetary Science DivisionQBS Quarterly Budget StatusSMD Science Mission Directorate