21
Social Media: Best Practices for Canadian Public Companies Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions Group June 21, 2011

Social Media for Public Companies

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This slideshow was presented at a seminar on June 21, 2011 at Fasken Martineau's Vancouver office highlighting best practices as well as potential legal pitfalls for public companies using social media for disclosure.

Citation preview

Page 1: Social Media for Public Companies

Social Media: Best Practices for Canadian Public Companies

Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions GroupJune 21, 2011

Page 2: Social Media for Public Companies

Welcome

• Moderator: Georald Ingborg, Partner, Fasken Martineau

• Panelists:• Eleanor Fritz, Director, Compliance & Disclosure, TSX• Rhylin Bailie, Director of Communications/IR, NovaGold• Caroline Clapham, Associate, Fasken Martineau

Page 3: Social Media for Public Companies

How you can digitally take part today:

• Share the information you heard here today on Twitter using the hashtag:

#FaskenSM4Pubcos

• Ask questions of the panellists using the hashtag and an @reply to:

@CarolineClapham

Page 4: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Either Twitter orFacebookBoth Twitter andFacebookTwitter Only

Facebook Only

Page 5: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

Natural ResourcesTechnologyConsumer GoodsAirlineBanks

Page 6: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

• Average # of Followers = 1,375 • Highest # of Followers = Lululemon

(84k) and Westjet (75k)

• Highest # of Fans = RIM (>7M) and Tim Hortons (1.6M)

Page 7: Social Media for Public Companies

NovaGold – a social media leaderGoal: expanding stakeholder reach

Page 8: Social Media for Public Companies

Implementation: Convincing your Team

Page 9: Social Media for Public Companies

$NG’s Experience:

Page 10: Social Media for Public Companies

General vs. Selective Disclosure

Page 11: Social Media for Public Companies

Material Fact or Material Change?

• Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc. (Supreme Court Of Canada)

• AiT Advanced Information Technologies Corporation, Bernard Jude Ashe And Deborah Weinstein (Ontario Securities Commission)

Social media implication: material changes must be generally disclosed

Page 12: Social Media for Public Companies

Misrepresentations

• Untrue statement• Half-true Statement – ie. Not enough info• Unintentional omission to disclose

Social media implication: THERE ARE NO TAKE-BACKS – every tweet/post is permanent

Page 13: Social Media for Public Companies

Third party information

• Endorsements• Sharing news• Promotional content• Entanglement• Analyst coverage

Social media implication: be careful with third party disclosure and information

Page 14: Social Media for Public Companies

Disclaimers and Mandated Disclosure

• Safe harbour statements - when, where and how

• Technical information

Social media implication: include links to meet disclosure requirements

Page 15: Social Media for Public Companies

Dissemination in the United States

• Is your company listed in the US?• What constitutes dissemination?• When is dissemination acceptable?

Social media implication: issuers that are not listed in the United States need to be attuned to these issues – consult legal before you post/tweet!

Page 16: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 17: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 18: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 19: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 20: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 21: Social Media for Public Companies