MDRC Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    1/12

    B u i l d i n g K n o w l e d g e i m p r o v e S o c i a l p o l i c y

    mdrc

    J a n u a r y

    2 0 1 2

    imprving academic prgress and

    substantiay imprving graduatin

    prspects, particuary fr disadvantaged

    students. This reprt incuded data fr

    ver 21,000 students frm fur chrts

    wh entered ninth grade between fa2005 and fa 2008.4 Findings in the reprt

    were based n a series f randmized

    tteries that were used when SSCs had

    mre appicants than seats, in rder t

    determine wh gt ffered an pprtunity

    t enr in an SSC and wh did nt. SSC

    tteries are a itte-knwn byprduct

    f the current district-wide high sch

    appicatin prcessing system (HSAPS).5

    These tteries make it pssibe trigrusy estimate the effects f enring

    in an SSC versus enring in sme ther

    New Yrk City pubic high sch, based

    n a cmparisn f subsequent utcmes

    fr ttery winners and ttery sers and

    a prcedure that accunts fr wh amng

    them enr in an SSC.6

    In a arge sampe, ike that used fr the

    MDRC study, ttery winners and ttery

    sers are the same, n average, in a

    ways befre they enter high sch.

    Cnsequenty, it is vaid t attribute any

    differences in their future academic

    utcmes t their access t an SSC.

    Because students wh se an SSC

    ttery attend ver 200 high schs that

    vary widey in their size, age, structure,

    academic prgrams, and effectiveness,

    the MDRC reprt judged SSCs against the

    Sst pst effts gt rtsp b n yk cts S

    pb Hh Shs f chBy Hward S. Bm and Rebecca Unterman

    During the past decade, NewYrk City undertk a district-wide high sch refrm that is perhaps

    unprecedented in its scpe, scae, and pace.

    Between fa 2002 and fa 2008, the sch

    district csed 23 arge faiing high schs(with graduatin rates bew 45 percent),1

    pened 216 new sma high schs (with

    different missins, structures, and student

    seectin criteria), and impemented a

    centraized high sch admissins prcess

    that assigns ver 90 percent f the rughy

    80,000 incming ninth-graders each year

    based n their sch preferences.

    At the heart f this refrm are 123 sma,academicay nnseective, pubic high

    schs. Each with apprximatey 100

    students per grade in grades 9 thrugh 12,

    these schs were created t serve sme f

    the districts mst disadvantaged students

    and are cated mainy in neighbrhds

    where arge faiing high schs had been

    csed.2 Hence, they prvide a reaistic

    chice fr students with widey varying

    academic backgrunds. MDRC researchers

    ca them sma schs f chice (SSCs)

    because f their sma size and the fact that

    they d nt screen students based n their

    academic backgrunds.3

    In June 2010, MDRC, a nnprt,

    nnpartisan research rganizatin,

    reeased a reprt n the effectiveness

    f 105 f the 123 new SSCs, which

    demnstrated that they are markedy

    P

    o

    l

    I

    C

    Y

    B

    R

    I

    E

    F

    demnstrated that they are markedy

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    2/12

    M D r C P o l i C y B r i e

    resurces during start-up.8 By integrating a

    demanding and cmprehensive academic

    curricuum, persna attentin t student

    academic prgress, and rea-wrd experiences

    with cmmunity partners, the new smaschs intended t prepare students fr bth

    cege and career.

    In ther cities, sma high schs are ften

    fashined by recnguring arge existing

    schs int smaer units in the same

    buidings with the same teachers and students;

    in cntrast, the typica SSC was created argey

    frm scratch with a principa, teachers, and

    students wh were new t the sch. At thesame time, many SSCs are cated with ther

    SSCs in buidings that previusy hused a

    arge pubic high sch that was csed.

    SSCs are nt just sma in size. They are

    purpsefuy rganized arund smaer

    educatina units that are designed t give

    students a better chance f being knwn by

    their teachers and ther aduts in the buiding.

    Fr exampe, many SSCs have created speciastudent advisry structures that prvide

    cmmn panning time fr teachers t discuss

    their students prgress and prbems.

    SSCs received start-up funding frm

    phianthrpic rganizatins pus technica

    assistance and picy supprt frm the New

    Yrk City Department f Educatin and

    intermediary rganizatins that were ften

    experienced in managing the aunching f

    new schs which heped t faciitate

    sch eadership devepment, staff hiring,

    and prgram start-up. Mst SSCs began with

    ny a ninth-grade cass, adding a subsequent

    grade each year. Finay, SSCs received specia

    awances with respect t serving Engish

    language learners and specia educatin

    students during their rst tw years f start-up.

    The creatin f SSCs was supprted by a

    cnsrtium f funders, ed by the Bi &

    vera effectiveness f a diverse grup f

    ther high schs.7 The resuts reeased in

    2010 indicated that, n average, the 105 SSCs

    studied increased student prgress tward

    graduatin during their rst three years fhigh sch and increased students fur-year

    graduatin rates.

    Given data that were avaiabe at the time,

    the rst MDRC reprt cud ny fw

    the rst student chrt (that entered in fa

    2005) thrugh fur years f high sch t

    examine its graduatin rates. This picy

    brief extends the anaysis by a year, which

    adds infrmatin n high sch graduatinrates fr the 2006 chrt and prvides a fth

    year f fw-up fr the 2005 chrt. This

    infrmatin makes it pssibe t address the

    fwing three questins:

    Was the psitive average effect f SSCs n

    fur-year graduatin rates fr the studys

    rst student chrt sustained thrugh the

    secnd chrt?

    Was this psitive average effect sustained

    acrss subgrups f students with differentprir academic prciency, famiy incme,

    race/ethnicity, and gender?

    Was the average fur-year graduatin effect

    sustained after ve years?

    The answer t a three f these questins is yes.

    w H a T a r e S S c s ?

    SSCs were deveped thrugh a cmpetitive

    prpsa prcess that was designed t

    ensure that sch funders met specied

    cnditins and t stimuate innvative ideas

    frm a range f stakehders and institutins.

    SSCs emphasize academic rigr and strng

    and sustained persna reatinships amng

    students and facuty. In additin, mst were

    funded with cmmunity partners wh ffer

    students reevant earning pprtunities inside

    and utside the cassrm and prvide sch

    facuty with additina stafng supprt and

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    3/12

    Meinda Gates Fundatin, the Carnegie

    Crpratin f New Yrk, and the open

    Sciety Institute. SSCs were impemented

    in cabratin with the United Federatin

    f Teachers and the Cunci f SchSupervisrs and Administratrs.10 Unike

    charter schs, which typicay perate

    independenty f the sch district in which

    they are cated, SSCs are directy respnsibe

    t the New Yrk City Department f Educatin.

    w H y S T u d y S S c s ?

    Amst a majr urban sch districts in the

    U.S. and a but fur states have attempted

    t create new sma schs r attemptedt transfrm arge schs int campuses

    with sma earning cmmunities.11 This

    mvement had its beginnings in the 1960s,

    when urban educatrs and cmmunity

    rganizatins began t impement smaer

    sch structures as an aternative t the arge

    high schs that dminated the andscape,

    many f which were faiing. By the ate 1990s,

    sma schs had emerged as a natina

    refrm strategy champined by such grupsas the Caitin f Essentia Schs and the

    Natina Assciatin f Secndary Sch

    Principas. This strategy priferated thrugh

    district- and fundatin-ed initiatives in majr

    cities ike Chicag, Phiadephia, Bstn,

    oakand, and New Yrk. In 2000, the Bi &

    Meinda Gates Fundatin aunched a natina

    campaign t imprve faiing urban high

    schs, with sma schs as a key strategy.12

    The cmmn thery f change underying

    bth sma schs and sma earning

    cmmunities species that smaer

    educatina units prmte strnger

    reatinships amng students, amng

    aduts, and between students and aduts.

    These reatinships, in turn, are expected

    t increase student engagement and hep

    teachers respnd t students academic and

    scia needs, thereby increasing students

    academic achievement.13 Prir research n

    sma schs has prduced mixed resuts

    abut their effectiveness. Sme studies have

    fund that they imprve student utcmes,

    such as increasing eves f academicachievement and wering rates f sch

    drput.14 In additin, sme studies suggest

    that these effects are mst prnunced

    fr disadvantaged students.15 on the ther

    hand, a majr study f a arge number f

    sma schs initiatives suggests that they

    d nt imprve student academic utcmes

    appreciaby.16 In a f these cases hwever, the

    nnexperimenta nature f the research imits

    its abiity t supprt causa cncusins.

    MDRCs ndings abut SSCs are reevant

    t current federa picy n high sch

    refrm, particuary the U. S. Department f

    Educatins Sch Imprvement Grants

    (SIGs) fr faiing schs. Refrms funded by

    SIGs incude sch transfrmatin, sch

    restart, sch csing, and sch turnarund.

    SSCs stradde severa f these categries since

    they are typicay repacements fr schsthat have csed and they perate as reguar

    pubic schs. Hwever, it is imprtant t

    recgnize that SSCs represent far mre than

    just changes in sch size and structure.

    They as represent innvative ways t use

    these structura changes t everage human,

    nancia, and curricuar resurces.

    The cuping f sma schs with a

    system f chice fr a entering ninth-

    graders as has reevance fr the natina

    debate abut charter schs. on the ne

    hand, SSCs share many simiarities with

    charters they are sma and persnaized;

    mst began with the hep f intermediary

    spnsrs that resembe charter management

    rganizatins; the students and teachers

    are there by chice; and the curricua are

    demanding. on the ther hand, SSCs are

    verseen by the Department f Educatin

    J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    4/12

    M D r C P o l i C y B r i e

    4

    The reprt fund simiar psitive effects n

    prgress tward graduatin in ninth grade

    fr subgrups f students wh varied in

    terms f their reading and math prciency

    befre entering high sch, their eigibiity

    fr free r reduced-price unches, and theirrace/ethnicity and gender.

    At tw and three years after students entered

    high sch, the study fund that SSCs

    increased their prgress tward graduatin by

    rughy the same amunt as they did during

    the rst year. And at fur years after students

    entered high sch, the study fund that

    SSCs increased high sch graduatin rates

    by 6.8 percentage pints (t 68.7 percent fr

    target SSC enrees frm 61.9 percent fr

    their cntr grup cunterparts).

    n Fs gt c

    rss f T Stt chts: Findings

    in Tabe 1 indicate that SSC effects n

    fur-year high sch graduatin rates are

    sustained thrugh a secnd chrt f entering

    ninth-graders. Enring in an SSC instead

    f anther type f New Yrk City pubic high

    with uninized teachers and principas;

    the schs are nnseective and pen t

    students regardess f academic prciency;

    and the sch chice prcess was designed

    t engage a entering ninth-graders, nt just

    the mst mtivated parents and chidren thatmight seek ut charter schs.

    H o w m u c H d o S S c s

    H e l p S T u d e n T S ?

    ps St Fs: Because students

    became part f the study sampe in fur

    annua chrts, MDRCs rst reprt n the

    effects f SSCs was based n fur years

    f fw-up fr the rst chrt f entering

    ninth-graders, three years f fw-up fr the

    secnd, tw years f fw-up fr the third,

    and ne year f fw-up fr the furth chrt.

    Based n data fr a fur chrts, the reprt

    fund that SSCs increased the percentage

    f students wh were n track17 tward

    graduatin in ninth grade by 10.0 percentage

    pints (t 58.5 percent fr target SSC

    enrees frm 48.5 percent fr their cntr

    grup cunterparts).18

    Table 1. estimtd avrg effcts of SSCs on Four-Yr Grdution Rts: Studnt Cohorts 1 nd 2

    ouTcome (%)TargeT

    SScenrolleeS

    conTrolgroup

    counTerparTS

    eSTimaTedeFFecT

    p-value ForeSTimaTed

    eFFecT

    graduaTion

    graduaTed From HigH ScHool 67.9 59.3 8.6 ** 0.000

    l t 19.9 19.6 0.3 0.406

    rts t 41.5 34.9 6.5 * 0.041

    a rts t 6.2 4.7 1.6 0.154

    college readineSS

    pss mth rts t 75 hh 23.3 22.5 0.8 0.682

    pss esh rts t 75 hh 37.3 29.7 7.6 ** 0.002

    NoTES: There are 13,064 student observations for cohorts one and two combined. There are no statistically signicant differences betweenestimated effects for the two cohorts. Because of rounding error and the complex calculations involved, results by diploma type do not sumexactly to those for overall graduation rates.

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    5/12

    J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2

    subgrups examined that had sampes that

    were arge enugh t supprt ndings.21

    Cnsider the resuts fr subgrups dened

    by students prir academic prciency, asmeasured by their eighth-grade state test

    scres in reading and math. New Yrk State

    reprts this prciency in fur eves. leves 1

    and 2 (did nt meet r partiay met standards)

    represent student perfrmance that is bew

    grade eve. leves 3 and 4 (fuy met standards

    r met standards with distinctin) represent

    perfrmance that is at r abve grade eve.

    Since very few sampe members scre in the

    tp categry, n ndings are reprted fr it.The ndings indicate that SSCs increased fur-

    year graduatin rates appreciaby fr students

    in eves 1, 2, and 3 f reading and math prir

    prciency.

    Athugh specic estimates vary smewhat

    (frm 7.7 t 11.3 percentage pints fr reading

    and frm 8.6 t 11.4 percentage pints fr

    math), a f the effects are appreciabe and

    statisticay signicant, indicating that everygrup beneted substantiay frm attending

    an SSC. Fr exampe the 11.4 percentage pint

    gain in high sch graduatin rates prduced

    by SSCs fr students with a eve 1 eighth-grade

    math prciency scre impies a 33 percent

    increase (11.4/34.5) in graduatin rates fr this

    subgrup f students with especiay weak math

    preparatin. Hwever, there is n cear pattern

    t the variatin in resuts acrss prciency

    subgrups; s whie the impacts are statisticay

    signicant, the reprted differences between

    subgrups are nt statisticay signicant.

    Therefre, ne shud nt cncude, fr

    instance, that SSCs wrked differenty fr eve 1

    students than fr eve 2 students, even thugh

    the pint estimates differ.

    These subgrup ndings by academic

    prciency are especiay striking given

    the dramatic differences that exist in the

    sch increased average fur-year graduatin

    rates fr the rst tw chrts cmbined by 8.6

    percentage pints (t 67.9 percent fr target

    SSC enrees frm 59.3 percent fr their

    cntr grup cunterparts).19 Amst a fthis graduatin effect reects an increase in

    receipt f New Yrk State Regents dipmas.

    Fr this type f dipma, students must pass

    a minimum f ve Regents examinatins

    (Engish language Arts, Mathematics,

    Science, Gba Histry, and American

    Histry) with a scre f 65 pints r abve

    and must pass a curses that are required

    by the state. Nne f the SSC graduatin

    effect appears t reect an increase in receiptf ca dipmas, which have ess stringent

    standards fr scres n Regents examinatins

    and are being phased ut by New Yrk State

    fr the graduating cass f 2012. likewise,

    itte if any f the SSC graduatin effect

    reects an increase in receipt f Advanced

    Regents dipmas, which have the mst

    stringent standards and are received by very

    few students wh appy t SSCs.

    Tabe 1 as indicates that enring in an

    SSC increased students cege readiness

    in Engish but nt in math, as measured

    by the percentage wh scred 75 pints r

    higher n the crrespnding New Yrk State

    Regents examinatins.20 This threshd

    is used by the City University f New Yrk

    t exempt students frm taking remedia

    curses in these subjects.

    n Sb Fs gt

    f T Stt chts: Adding a secnd

    chrt f students t the anaysis f SSC

    effects n fur-year graduatin rates

    increased the sampe size by enugh t

    make it pssibe t examine hw these

    effects vary acrss subgrups f students

    with diverse backgrunds. Findings in Tabe

    2 indicate that SSCs increased fur-year high

    sch graduatin rates appreciaby fr a

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    6/12

    M D r C P o l i C y B r i e

    Table 2. estimtd effcts of SSCs on Four-Yr Grdution Rts for Studnt Sugroups: Studnt Cohorts 1 nd 2

    STudenT cHaracTeriSTicTargeT

    SScenrolleeS

    conTrolgroup

    counTerparTS

    eSTimaTedeFFecT

    p-valueSTima

    eFFe

    8TH-grade reading proFiciency

    nt t Stt l Sts ( 1) 37.3 29.6 7.7 * 0

    pt t Stt l Sts ( 2) 66.7 55.5 11.2 **

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    7/12

    J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2

    experienced a 7.6 percentage pint increase

    in fur-year graduatin rates; the rughy 43

    percent f students in the sampe wh were

    nt knwn experienced a 10.1 percentage

    pint increase. Bth ndings are statisticaysignicant athugh they are nt statisticay

    signicanty different frm each ther. Thus,

    cntrary t what might be expected, students

    wh make an effrt t becme knwn t their

    SSC d not benet mre frm attending it

    than students wh d nt make this effrt.

    n Fs F-y gt

    rts f th Sts Fst Stt cht:

    Cmpeting hyptheses exist abut the ikeyeffects f SSCs n ve-year graduatin

    rates. Fr exampe, SSCs might be especiay

    effective at keeping strugging students

    engaged in sch fr a fth year in rder

    t meet their graduatin requirements. If

    s, then SSC effects n ve-year graduatin

    rates might be greater than their effects n

    fur-year graduatin rates. on the ther

    hand, SSC effects n fur-year graduatin

    rates might reect their abiity t speedup graduatin fr students wh therwise

    wud need ve years. In additin, due t

    their sma staffs, SSCs might nt have the

    capacity t prvide the additina resurces

    needed t adequatey assist students in their

    fth year. Fr either r bth f these reasns,

    SSC effects n ve-year graduatin rates

    might be ess than their effects n fur-year

    graduatin rates.

    Tabe 3 presents estimates f SSC effects n

    graduatin rates at ve years after the studys

    rst student chrt entered high sch, as

    we as their fur-year graduatin rates (frm

    MDRCs rst reprt). These ndings indicate

    that between year fur and year ve, graduatin

    rates fr target SSC enrees and their cntr

    grup cunterparts increased by amst exacty

    the same amunt. Hence, the effect f SSCs n

    graduatin rates did nt change.

    graduatin prospects fr each subgrup, as

    measured by its cntr grup cunterparts

    graduatin rate. Fr exampe, rates range

    frm 29.6 t 55.5 t 69.8 percent fr eves 1,

    2, and 3 in reading, respectivey. Therefre,SSCs increase high sch graduatin rates

    appreciaby fr students with extremey weak

    graduatin prspects, mdest prspects,

    and strnger prspects.

    Findings fr subgrups f students wh were

    and were nt eigibe fr free r reduced-

    price unch te a simiar stry. They indicate

    that SSCs increased graduatin rates fr

    bth subgrups (by 11.2 and 6.9 percentagepints) even thugh their graduatin

    prspects differed substantiay.

    Findings fr subgrups f students by race/

    ethnicity and gender further reinfrce the

    preceding resuts. They indicate that SSCs

    increase graduatin rates appreciaby fr

    a subgrups with a sampe that is arge

    enugh t detect these effects.22 Specicay,

    SSCs increase graduatin rates fr backmaes and femaes by 9.9 and 8.3 percentage

    pints and fr Hispanic maes and femaes

    by 7.7 and 8.7 percentage pints.23

    The na subgrup ndings in the tabe

    are based n whether r nt students were

    knwn ahead f time t the SSC in whse

    ttery they participated.24 A student can

    becme knwn t an SSC by cntacting it

    in persn r by teephne, by visiting it, by

    meeting with its representatives at a high

    sch fair, r in ther ways. T prmte

    infrmed sch chice, the New Yrk City

    Department f Educatin encurages eighth-

    graders and their parents t d a f these

    things, which require initiative and effrt.

    Findings in Tabe 2 indicate that the rughy

    57 percent f students in the subgrup

    sampe wh were knwn t their SSC

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    8/12

    M D r C P o l i C y B r i e

    Specicay, graduatin rates increased frm

    68.7 percent in year fur t 75.2 percent in year

    ve (r by 6.5 percentage pints) fr target SSC

    enrees and frm 61.9 percent in year fur t68.1 percent in year ve (r by 6.2 percentage

    pints) fr their cntr grup cunterparts.

    The effect f SSCs n ve-year graduatin rates

    (a 7.1 percentage pint increase) therefre was

    amst identica t the effect f SSCs n fur-

    year graduatin rates (a 6.8 percentage pint

    increase).25 In additin, at ve years, the majrity

    f the SSC impact cmes frm receiving Regents

    dipmas, as was the case at fur years.

    w H y a r e T H e S e

    F i n d i n g S i m p o r T a n T ?

    T pace these ndings in perspective,

    cnsider: (1) the scae f the interventin

    evauated, (2) the size f the effects it

    prduced, (3) the nature f the ppuatin it

    served, (4) the diversity f subppuatins

    it beneted, (5) the institutina nature f

    the interventin, and (6) the rigr f the

    evauatin cnducted.

    The 105 SSCs studied serve abut1.

    45,000 students at fu capacity. This

    is equivaent in size t the entire high

    sch ppuatin f Hustn, Texas,the seventh argest sch district in the

    United States.

    The estimated 8.6 percentage pint effect2.

    f SSCs n fur-year graduatin rates

    is equivaent in magnitude t abut 43

    percent f the gap in graduatin rates

    between white students and students f

    cr in New Yrk City.26 Furthermre,

    this effect is reative t currenty existing

    schs, nt t the 23 arge faiing high

    schs that were csed, schs that had

    graduatin rates that were much wer than

    the rates f the cntr grup schs that

    the SSCs were cmpared with in this study.

    SSC effects reect a student ppuatin3.

    that is 93.2 percent back r Hispanic,

    83.9 percent eigibe fr free r reduced-

    price unch, 21.8 percent verage fr

    Table 3. estimtd avrg effcts of SSCs on Four-Yr nd Fiv-Yr Grdution Rts: Studnt Cohort 1

    ouTcome (%)TargeT

    SScenrolleeS

    conTrolgroup

    counTerparTS

    eSTimaTedeFFecT

    p-value ForeSTimaTed

    eFFecT

    Four-year graduaTion

    graduaTed From HigH ScHool 68.7 61.9 6.8* 0.013l t 24.6 21.9 2.8 0.261

    rts t 39.5 34.6 4.9 0.074

    a rts t 4.4 5.5 -1.1 0.366

    Five-year graduaTion

    graduaTed From HigH ScHool 75.2 68.1 7.1* 0.018

    l t 27.3 24.4 3.0 0.265

    rts t 44.9 40.0 4.9 0.081

    a rts t 4.7 5.8 -1.1 0.368

    NoTES: There are 5,363 and 5,428 student observations for the four-year and ve-year analyses, respectively. The difference represents65 students who reenrolled in a NYC public high school between their fourth and fth years. Because of rounding error and the complexcalculations involved, results by diploma type do not sum exactly to those for overall graduation rates

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    9/12

    J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2

    grade, and 70.5 percent bew grade eve

    in reading and 63.9 percent bew grade

    eve in math, based n state tests in

    these subjects in eighth grade.

    SSC effects were experienced by students4.

    with widey varying graduatin prspects,

    by students wh were and were nt

    eigibe fr free and reduced-price unch,

    by students wh were mae and femae,

    back and Hispanic, and by students wh

    were knwn and nt knwn t their SSCs.

    New Yrk Citys SSCs were deveped5.

    thrugh a demanding prpsa prcessthat was designed t ensure specied

    cnditins and t stimuate innvatin

    frm a range f stakehders and

    institutins. This differs markedy frm

    many sma schs in ther jurisdictins

    that are created by recnguring existing

    schs. Furthermre, SSCs perate

    within the sch district, in cntrast

    t charter schs, which perate mre

    independenty.

    These ndings are based n data fr a6.

    very arge sampe that was created by a

    series f naturay ccurring randmized

    tteries. Hence, they prvide unusuay

    rigrus evidence abut the causa

    effects f SSCs. And instead f reying

    n a singe test scre as a prxy fr

    ater ife utcmes, the study measures

    actua grade prgressin, high sch

    graduatin, and Regents dipmas

    attained and scres achieved.

    w H a T a r e T H e n e x T S T e p S

    F o r r e S e a r c H o n S S c s ?

    over the next three years, with funding frm

    the Bi and Meinda Gates Fundatin,

    MDRC and its partners wi expand and

    deepen their research n SSCs t address

    such questins as:

    D SSCs increase cege readiness and

    success in pstsecndary educatin?

    Hw were SSCs created? Hw d they

    perate? What bstaces d they face?

    Hw are they deaing with these bstaces?What are their mst imprtant surces

    f nancia and human resurces? What

    factrs d they beieve are mst imprtant

    t their success?

    Hw d SSC effects vary by sch and

    what factrs predict this variatin?

    What re des teacher seectin, training,

    and quaity pay in prducing SSC effects?

    c o n c l u S i o nIn summary, the present ndings prvide

    highy credibe evidence that in a reativey

    shrt perid f time, with sufcient

    rganizatin and resurces, an existing

    sch district can impement a cmpex

    high sch refrm that markedy imprves

    graduatin rates fr a arge ppuatin f

    w-incme, disadvantaged students f cr.

    e n d n o T e S1 The csure f the 23 arge high schs happened vertime as they n nger accepted entering ninth-gradersand, thus, phased ut ver fur years.

    2 Fifty SSCs are in the Brnx and 31 are in Brkyn. Manyf them are in the citys prest neighbrhds.

    3 other new sma secndary schs created by New YrkCity during this time perid incude 38 genera high schsfr grades 9-12, which screen students based n theiracademic backgrunds; 21 transfer schs that are designedt hep students wh are verage fr grade and under-credited; 33 midde/high schs fr grades 6-12 r 7-12; andne speciaized high sch fr high-perfrming students.

    4 Bm, levy Thmpsn, and Unterman (2010).5 SSC tteries are nt pubic events, but rather the resut fthe rues by which HSAPS assigns students t SSCs. of the123 SSCs created in New Yrk City, 105 had at east ne t-tery fr ne f the fur student chrts in the present study.

    6 Appendix A f Bm, levy Thmpsn, and Unterman(2010) describes hw HSAPS creates SSC tteries, hwan SSC ttery creates a treatment grup f SSC tterywinners and a cntr grup f SSC ttery sers, andhw this infrmatin was used, tgether with infrmatinabut the schs in which students enred, t estimatethe effects fenrollingin an SSC reative t enring insme ther New Yrk City pubic high sch.

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    10/12

    SSCs wrked better fr the secnd chrt than the rst.

    20 These ndings n cege readiness fr chrts neand tw cmbined te the same stry as thse fr chrtne in MDRCs rst reprt.

    21 T estimate SSC effects fr student subgrups, thesampe fr each SSC ttery is stratied by the studentcharacteristics that dene each subgrup. Because nt

    a tteries cntain students frm each stratum, the ttasampe represented by each type f student characteristic(e.g., by reading prciency r race/ethnicity) varies.

    22 The sampe fr ther maes cmprised ny 283 stu-dent bservatins; fr ther femaes, the sampe wasny 261 student bservatins.

    23 The estimated SSC effect fr Hispanic maes is nt sta-tisticay signicant at the 0.05 eve, athugh it is statisti-cay signicant at the 0.10 eve, which is used by manyresearchers. Furthermre, this nding is cnsistent withthse fr the ther three subgrups f students f crand is nt statisticay signicanty different frm them.Hence, the data suggest that SSCs increase fur-year

    graduatin rates fr Hispanic maes, athugh the evi-dence fr this subgrup is weaker than that fr the thers.

    24 Bm, levy Thmpsn, and Unterman (2010) de-scribe hw each SSC ttery incudes either students whwere knwn t the SSC r students wh were nt knwnt it, but nt bth. lttery winners and sers are thusperfecty matched in this regard.

    25 The sight discrepancy between the reprted differencein changes ver time f graduatin rates fr target SSCenrees and their cntr grup cunterparts and thechange ver time in the estimated impact f SSCs n thegraduatin rate is due t runding.

    26 MDRC cmputatins based n 2011 data frm the NYC

    Department f Educatin indicate a gap between citywidefur-year graduatin rates fr white students and studentsf cr equa t 21.0 percentage pints fr the fa 2005chrt and 18.8 percentage pints fr the fa 2006 chrt.The average gap is thus 19.9 percentage pints.

    reFerenceS

    Fr a anayses in this brief, MDRCs cacuatins useHigh Sch Appicatin Prcessing System data frmeighth-graders in 2004-2005 t 2006-2007, as we asdata frm New Yrk City Department f Educatin atten-dance, curse credits, Regents exam, and enrment esfrm the 2005-2006 t 2009-2010 sch years.

    Aenswrth, Eaine, and Jhn Q. Eastn. 2005. The On-Track Indicator as a Predictor of High School Graduation .Chicag: Cnsrtium n Chicag Sch Research.

    Bm, Hward S., Saskia levy Thmpsn, and RebeccaUnterman. 2010. Transforming the High School Experience:How New York Citys New Small Schools Are Boosting Stu-dent Achievement and Graduation Rates. New Yrk: MDRC

    Evan, Aimee, Jamie Shknik, Mette Huberman, BeckySmerdn, Barbara Means, Mengi Sng, Karen Mitche,Chares Strey, linda Shear, and Kazuaki Uekawa. 2006.Evaluation of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations HighSchool Grants Initiative. Washingtn, DC: American Insti-tutes fr Research.

    M D r C P o l i C y B r i e

    0

    Crrespnding ndings fr the effects f winning an SSCttery are presented in Appendix B f the rigina reprt.These ndings are cnsistent with thse fr the effects fenring in an SSC. The anaysis in this picy brief usesthe same methdgy.

    7 Because MDRCs study examines ny one component fNew Yrk Citys vera high sch refrm initiative (thatis, the sma schs f chice), it des nt attempt t de-termine the vera effect f these refrms. Neither desit attempt t determine the effect f csing the 23 argefaiing high schs n students wh wud have attendedthem had they nt been csed.

    8 Fr exampe, a aw rm prvides internships and em-beds rea-wrd exampes in the curricuum fr the UrbanAssemby Sch fr law & Justice, and the Urban Assem-by New Yrk Harbr Sch is grwing ne f the argestyster beds in the regin.

    9 As a resut f a curt decisin, the New Yrk CityDepartment f Educatin ended this practice.

    10 As described by Randi Weingarten at a frum n sma

    schs spnsred by the Aiance fr Exceent Educatinin Nvember f 2010, the United Federatin f Teachersparticipated in the panning and apprva prcess frmany f the new sma schs in New Yrk City.

    11 By 2008, 46 f 50 states and the District f Cumbiahad received mutimiin-dar federa grants fr smaearning cmmunities (U.S. Department f Educatin,n.d.).

    12 Whie the Gates Fundatins stated ga was t sup-prt the creatin f schs that pssessed seven Attri-butes f High Perfrming Schs, it was the structurafcus n sch size (nt t exceed 100 students pergrade) that became a key strategy f the fundatinsgrantmaking (Evan et a., 2006).

    13 See Finn and Vek (1993); lee and leb (2000); Was-ey et a. (2000); Kem and Cnne (2004).

    14 Fr student achievement, see Haer, Mnk, and Tien(1993); Hwey (1989); Hwey and Huang (1991); leeand Smith (1997). Fr drput rates, see Pittman andHaughwut (1987); McMuen, Sipe, and Wf (1994).

    15 See lee, Bryk, and Smith (1993); lee and Smith (1995);lee and Smith (1997).

    16 See Evan et a. (2006).

    17 The n-track measure was deveped by the Cnsr-tium n Chicag Sch Research. High sch studentswh are n track t graduate by the end f their rst year

    meaning that they have earned at east 10 credits andare faiing n mre than ne cre subject are three anda haf times mre ikey t graduate in fur years than arether students (Aenswrth and Eastn, 2005).

    18 Target SSC enrees are sampe members fr whmSSC effects are reprted. Appendix A f Bm, levyThmpsn, and Unterman (2010) describes hw thisgrup is dened and hw ndings fr it are btained.

    19 The estimated average effect f SSCs n fur-yeargraduatin rates was 9.9 percentage pints fr the secndchrt and 6.8 fr the rst chrt. Bth f these estimatesare statisticay signicant, athugh the difference betweenthem is nt. Hence, ne cannt say with cndence that

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    11/12

    Finn, Jeremy D., and Kristen E. Vek, 1993. Sch Char-acteristics Reated t Student Engagement.Journal ofNegro Education 62, 3: 249-268.

    Haer, Emi J., David H. Mnk, and lydia T. Tien. 1993.Sma Schs and Higher-order Thinking Skis.Journalof Research in Rural Education 9, 2: 66-73.

    Hwey, Craig B. 1989. Synthesis f the Effects f Sch

    and District Size: What Research Says Abut Achievementin Sma Schs and Sch Districts.Journal of Ruraland Small Schools 4, 1: 2-12.

    Hwey, Craig B., and Gary Huang. 1991. ExtracurricuarParticipatin and Achievement: Sch Size as a PssibeMediatr f SES Inuence Amng Individua Students.ERIC Dcument N. ED336247. Charestn, WV: Appaa-chia Educatina labratry.

    Kem, Adena M., and James P. Cnne. 2004. Reatin-ships Matter: linking Teacher Supprt t Student Engage-ment and Achievement.Journal of School Health 74, 7:262-273.

    lee, Vaerie E., Anthny S. Bryk, and Juia B. Smith. 1993.

    The organizatin f Effective Secndary Schs. Re-view of Research in Education 19, 1 (January): 171-267.

    lee, Vaerie E., and Susanna leb. 2000. Sch Sizein Chicag Eementary Schs: Effects n Teachers At-titudes and Students Achievement.American EducationResearch Journal 31, 1:3-31.

    a c K n o w l e d g m e n T S

    This picy brief and the study upn which it is based

    are funded by the Bi & Meinda Gates Fundatin. The

    authrs thank the fundatin eaders wh supprted thiswrk Aan Gstn, Vicki Phiips, and James Shetn

    (frmery f Gates) and the fundatin staff wh pr-

    vided hepfu guidance and feedback: David Siver (ur

    prject fcer), Adam Tucker, Sara Aen, Isis Randph-

    McCree, and Nah Wepman.

    The study wud nt have been pssibe withut cntinued

    supprt and cperatin frm s many persns frm the

    New Yrk City Department f Educatin that they are t

    numerus t name. In additin, we beneted frm discus-

    sins with Avin Rth, Parag Pathak, Atia Abdukadirgu,

    and Nei Drsin, creatrs f New Yrks High SchAppicatin Prcessing System, wh shared their insights

    abut ur study design. Furthermre, we received much

    hepfu advice frm Jennifer Hi, Brian Jacb, Thmas Kane,

    Jeffrey King, Sean Reardn, and Richard Murnane, and frm

    ur current and frmer ceagues at MDRC: Grdn Ber-

    in, Fred Ditte, Jhn Hutchins, Rb Ivry, James Kempe

    (frmery f MDRC), Saskia levy Thmpsn (frmery f

    MDRC), Pei Zhu, Micah Delaurentis, and Christian Fster.

    Disseminatin f MDRC pubicatins is supprted by the

    fwing funders that hep nance MDRCs pubic picy

    utreach and expanding effrts t cmmunicate the re-

    lee, Vaerie E., and Juia B. Smith. 1995. Effects f HighSch Restructuring and Size n Eary Gains in Achieve-ment and Engagement. Sociology of Education 68, 4:241-270.

    lee, Vaerie E., and Juia B. Smith. 1997. High SchSize: Which Wrks Best and fr Whm? EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis 19, 3: 205-227.

    McMuen, Bernard. J., Cynthia l. Sipe, and Wendy C.Wf. 1994. Charter and Student Achievement: Early Evi-dence from School Restructuring in Philadelphia. Phiade-phia: Center fr Assessment and Picy Devepment.

    New Yrk City Department f Educatin. 2011. NYCGraduatin Rates Cass f 2010 (2006 Chrt). Web site:http://schs.nyc.gv

    Pittman, Rbert B., and Perri Haughwut. 1987. Inu-ence f High Sch Size n Drput Rate. EducationEvaluation and Policy Analysis 9, 4: 337-343.

    U.S. Department f Educatin. n.d. Smaller Learning Com-munities Program. Web site: www.ed.gv/prgrams/scp/funding.htm.

    Wasey, Patricia A., Michee Fine, Matt Gadden, NiceE. Hand, Sherry P. King, Esther Msak, and linda C.Pwe. 2000. Small Schools: Great Strides. New Yrk: BankStreet Cege f Educatin.

    Weingarten, Randi. (2010, octber). lecture. Presentedat the Aiance fr Exceent Educatins Sma SchsFrum. Washingtn, DC.

    suts and impicatins f ur wrk t picymakers, practi-

    tiners, and thers: The Ambrse Mne Fundatin, The

    Annie E. Casey Fundatin, Carnegie Crpratin f New

    Yrk, The Kresge Fundatin, Sander Fundatin, andThe Starr Fundatin.

    In additin, earnings frm the MDRC Endwment hep sus-

    tain ur disseminatin effrts. Cntributrs t the MDRC

    Endwment incude Aca Fundatin, The Ambrse M-

    ne Fundatin, Anheuser-Busch Fundatin, Brist-Myers

    Squibb Fundatin, Chares Stewart Mtt Fundatin, Frd

    Fundatin, The Gerge Gund Fundatin, The Grabe

    Fundatin, The lizabeth and Frank Newman Charitabe

    Fundatin, The New Yrk Times Cmpany Fundatin, Jan

    Nichsn, Pau H. oNei Charitabe Fundatin, Jhn S.

    Reed, Sander Fundatin, and The Stupski Famiy Fund, as

    we as ther individua cntributrs.

    The ndings and cncusins in this brief d nt neces-

    sariy represent the fcia psitins r picies f the

    funders.

    Cpyright 2012 by MDRC. A rights reserved.

    a B o u T T H e a u T H o r S

    Hward S. Bm is MDRCs Chief Scia Scientist, and

    Rebecca Unterman is a Research Assciate in MDRCs

    K-12 Educatin Picy Area.

    J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2

  • 8/3/2019 MDRC Report

    12/12

    B u i l d i n g K n o w l e d g eT o i m p r o v e S o c i a l p o l i c y

    mdrc16 East 34th StreetNew Yrk, NY 10016-4326

    cHange Service reQueSTed

    NoNPRoFIT

    oRGANIZATIoN

    US PoSTAGE

    PAID

    WASHINGToN, D

    PERMIT No. 3070

    Sst pst effts gt rtsp b n yk cts S pb Hh Shs f ch

    By Hward S. Bm and Rebecca Unterman

    T aking advantage f ttery-ike features in New Yrk Citys high schadmissins prcess, this study prvides rigrus evidence that new sma

    pubic high schs are narrwing the educatina attainment gap and markedy

    imprving graduatin prspects, particuary fr disadvantaged students. The newndings in this picy brief demnstrate that these schs are having a sustained effect

    n graduatin rates, with psitive impacts fr virtuay every subgrup, incuding mae

    and femae students f cr, students with w eighth-grade prciency in math and

    Engish, and students eigibe fr free and reduced-priced unch. In additin, the sma

    high schs shw psitive impacts n ve-year graduatin rates and n a measure f

    cege readiness.2