The Internet of Things

Gastcollege Erik van der Zee

26 oktober 2015 (10:30-12:30)

Hogeschool Windesheim

Contents

• Introductie

• Part I

– Things

– Internet of Things (concept)

• Pauze

• Part II

– Locatie en het Internet of Things

• Discussie

Introductie

• Drs. Erik van der Zee

– Fysisch Geograaf and Bedrijfseconoom

– Senior Consultant Geo-ICT en GIS bij www.geodan.nl

– PhD Kandidaat “Added value of Location in the IoT”

– E-mail Erik.van.der.Zee@geodan.nl

– Twitter @erikvanderzee

Introductie

Things

Van “Dumb” naar “Smart”…

Things…

“Dumb” Thing

+Micro computer (Arduino / Raspberry Pi / MEMS)

+ Sensors en Actuators

+ Internet connection

+ Digital identity (avatar + interactie mogelijkheden via API)

= “Smart” Thing

Smart Things = “Internet of Things”

Smart Things

+ + + + Thing Computer

Sensor(s) and/or

Actuator(s)

Internet Connection

Digital Identity

(“avatar”)

= Smart Thing

Sensors Actuators

Sensors vs Actuators

Sensors + Actuators (“Kits”)

Microcontrollers

Arduino

Raspberry Pi

Netduino Waspmote

Beagleboard Smart Citizen

• Digital identity of things on social media

Facebook of Things

Internet of Things

Smart Environments

Big Data en IoT

Smart Environment Use Cases

IoT Reference Architecture

Source: http://wso2.com/whitepapers/a-reference-architecture-for-the-internet-of-things

Communication

Connecting the Things in the Internet of Things

Direct and Indirect Communication

IoT Platforms

Source: Thingworx

Things working together

Event Processing (patterns and recipes)

Nerve system

Nerve system

Actuators

Event stream processing

Sensors

• Continuous cycle of Sensing Analysis Acting … (etc.)

Smart Environments

Sensing Analysis Act(uat)ing raw events meaningful

events

Data creation

Controlling / alerting /

notification / routing of

objects and people

Open Data Open Data Open Data

Sense – Analyse - Act

Source: Celent

Event Processing

Patterns

• Event processing

• Complex Event Processing (CEP)(meerdere sensor streams)

“Temp. > 40°C”

“Rook = Yes”

“Temp. > 40°C” AND “Rook = Yes”

Alarmmelding “Mogelijk brand in kamer x.x!” (“meaningful event”)

“Temp. > 40°C”

Alleen overgangen meten

Patterns (voorbeelden)

• Incident detector (waarde boven threshold)

• Gap detector (no data)

• Analytic Engines using “Event Rules”

Event Stream Processing (ESP)

IF This Then That (IFTTT)

Voorbeelden IFTTT

Werking IFTTT

Toekomstige mogelijkheden

Pauze

Effe een bakkie koffie…

IoT en Locatie

Where are the Things?

Contents

• Waarom is locatie belangrijk

• Positions of Things (positie bepaling)

• Geofences (“zones”)

• Spatial relations between Things

• Geo Event Processing

• Voorbeelden

Belang van locatie

Location Use Cases

Source: ITU 2013

Locatie en ruimtelijke relaties zijn verbindende factoren in het IoT (alle

fysieke objecten hebben een locatie)

Posities van Things bepalen

All (Smart) Things have a location

Device and Network Positioning

Indirect positioning

• Location of card scanners (Bank|NS|…) / camera’s are known…

Geometries

Importance of dimensions (3D)

Bron: http://www.lc.nl

Bron: http://www.at5.nl

Bron: http://www.flitsnieuws.nl

Spatial Relationships

Geofencing

• Real-Time Spatial Operators – Inside, Outside, Enter, Exit

– Intersect, Disjoint, Touches, Contains, Crosses, Equals, Overlaps, Within

• Real-Time Geometry Processors – Buffer, Simplifier, Projector, Union, Difference, Cutter, Convex Hull

Geofencing (“zones”)

• Silence zones

• School zone

• Groundwater protection zone

• Environmental

• Road construction zone

• Party zone

• Area prohibition or House arrest

• Parking fee zone

• Surveillance zone

• Risk zones

• “Lights on” zone

Dynamic Zones… (rain alerts)

T=16:00 T=17:00 T=18:00 T=19:00

T=20:00 T=21:00 T=22:00 T=23:00

Thing “Zones” (static or moving)

Geo Event Processing

Input Streams (connectors) In

pu

ts

Ou

tpu

ts

GeoEvent Services

Real-time processors In

pu

ts

Ou

tpu

ts

GeoEvent Services

Output Streams (examples) In

pu

ts

Ou

tpu

ts

GeoEvent Services

• What fishing vessels are inside designated “no fishing” zones?

Real-time geospatial analytics (example 1)

Features

Challenge #2

Continuous Analysis

Inside Boundary

Vessel

Alert

Applications

• Tell a parent when their child leaves school property.

Real-time geospatial analytics (example 2)

Challenge #3

Continuous Analysis

Features

Outside Boundary

Child

Applications

IFTTT en Locatie (Android)

IFTTT en Locatie (iOS)

Voorbeelden IoT en Locatie

Smart Bins

Smart Parking

Smart Dating

Real-time traffic control

Environmental Monitoring

Stratumseind 2.0 – Eindhoven

• Crowd control

• Automated Number Plate Recognition (ANPR)

• Gender / Face Recognition

• … Recognition

Smart Surveillance

Tot Slot

Marcus Kirsch – The Age of the Connector

Forget the digital paradigm shift, think bigger. Forget new technologies and mechanics, times have moved on from celebrating the next kickstarter project and startup billionaire, its more essential. 55 years ago, Alvin Toffler wrote ‘Future Shock’ and shocked the world with the statement that the service industry is here to stay and that new types of businesses with new types of skillsets have created a new market and manufacturing has to deal with it. What he described in detail was the struggle of culture accepting this and making sense of all this in our heads. About 200 years ago, industrial revolution had redefined the role of the individual within the world that was shaped through new tools and ways of thinking. We can still see echoes of this manufacturing model to be at the heart of businesses. We can still see companies struggling with the idea of seeing their business as a service. Now we live in a connected world and things have changed again. Products have de-manifested themselves or turned into services. Services exist as connecting points within or across infrastructures and ecosystems. Ecosystems are products in themselves. Who are the people, who can understand all this and see the future for what it should be? They are the connectors. As much as linear computer code made way for object-oriented programming, music albums have atomised into songs, new financial currencies can be managed as a decentralised entities

instead of a central bank. What is essentially important is not to be able to connect things, but to see which things to connect where and this is the very new thinking of the new generation, this is how our children will look at things. There are already proposals to stop teaching kids facts, but rather teach them how to find their own learning tools and knowledge resources. Give a man a fish … teach him how to fish.

Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, AirBNB, UBER, they all connect us to what we need to get connected to. The next generation of businesses and skillsets will need to not just get connected but be good at connecting the right things for the right reasons. We have left the era where the latest trend is a new mechanic, a connection and gimmick that shows a functionality, but doesn’t have a particular purpose. Yes, that’s why advertising is struggling as it left storytelling and people for cheap gimmicks. That’s why the museum industry has an annual trend like ‘being on Second Life’. That is why most companies are hiring people who know current mechanics, to improve and grow their business. But mechanics are not values and mechanics are a dozen for a given human behaviour to serve with a product and service. We are slowly but surely leaving the era of the (mechanics) specialist for the era of the connector. The challenge is to value the connector more, quickly. Currently, when you apply for a job, people expect you to have done the same thing for years and only leads to people claiming having done UX for 15 years. This is insane and it needs a value shift in culture to acknowledge, that

t-shaped and cross-disciplinary people are actually the ones making the real impact.

Bron: https://medium.com/@uncleunvoid/the-age-of-the-connector-1d29c585f23c

Einde

Vragen?