Upload
peter-brantley
View
6.097
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Moving books onto the network and the ramifications for how we define reading, and our privacy.
Citation preview
Reading the Next Book
Peter Brantley Sept/Oct 2007
DLF
“a book is a machine to think with.”
I. A. RichardsPrinciples of Literary Criticism1924
the book is a social construction — a very successful commodity form
that is a physical representation of content
that has been remarkably successful for almost all modern-era human cultures
reading, then, is a social product :
a combination of a commodity artifact(i.e., the book as a physical object), the way human language works, an understanding of space, quiet.
analog culture is being uplifted to digital
... and so ...what is a “book” is being wholly redefined into a new kind of commodity
— and so then also is “reading”being wholly redefined, subtly.
reading [ to oneself ] was once the epitomeof a solitary act,
butnow reading, as a product, is becoming a social act,woven into the network
fabric.
the transition is imminent(but implied)
by the increasing digitization of text production
books are morphing into digitalthrough two different paths:
1. digital production of the new2. scanning of the old
direct digital production (by publishers)
• attractive cost savings over time• but complex, expensive to
implement• therefore often a slow transition
scanning printed material :
a) externally - Goog, Msft, Ingram (content > external party control)
b) internally - publisher initiated (content > internal group control)
access modes are split in Twain:
Old: package format (bin w/drm: legacy ebook)New: network access
(reflowable text/html: IDPF epub)
advantage adheres to -
text/html + network access
text/html advantages:
• native media easier to maintain than binary
• user enrichment is straightforward (on/off)
• content can be redrawn by the user• easy accessibility = support for blind• device-independent, adaptive re-
formatting • text is less demanding of hardware
network advantages
• print on demand• social - sharing, recommending, rating • content enhancement (georef, temporal)• licensing revenue attractive (vs
purchase)• highly granular usage data aggregation• local caching with sync straightforward• constant content updates through push • greater account storage available
and Google .... ?
Google presents page images Text-copy support is limited.
GOOG does not currently support “.epub”. (but they could at the very least for PD text)
Eventual conflicts with Ingram and Amazon are likely for the future discovery of content.
How do users pay for digital services?
“Show me the money!!”
public domain might be free
that is a social responsibility> we must make it happen <everyone benefits through access
the rest will be paid, somehow
revenue models:
advertising-supported - or -
expect PPV for individualslicensing for
organization/enterprise
what can’t easily generate revenueis the broad class of “orphan works”:
• not obviously in public domain• could be in-copyright • probably out of print• rights holder is uncertain
if Google settles with publishers ...for in-copyright, out of print books
expect a licensing scheme(voluntary collective licensing)
revenue sharing between publishers and Google
library booksdigitized
by Googlethen resoldby Googlelicensed
by libraries
all online modelsare a mixed blessing
particularly forreading!!
“Architecture is politics ... ”
- Mitch Kapor
PRIVACY
in the digital world privacy does not inherently existit must be explicitly designed for.
& because engineering is expensiveuser control of information may be the rarest artifact on the network.
if we should not be careful
privacy becomes a corporate commodity(not even a public commodity)negotiable for purchase
libraries had protectedand still protectin their contracts
but agglomeration of informationwill certainly only increase with timeand the power of awareness with it
StreetView
capture pictures of peopleon the street, in shops, in homes
is this a privacy violation?
Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, which went into effect on January 1, 2004.
Street View "does not appear to meet the basic requirements of knowledge, consent, and limited collection and use as set out in the legislation." – Canadian privacy commissioner,
letter to Google, Sept 2007
"We would launch Street View in Canada in keeping with the principles and requirements of Canadian law ... we'll have to focus on finding ways to make sure that individual's faces are not identifiable in pictures taken in Canada and that license plate numbers are not identifiable in Canada.”
-- Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy counsel
the majority of network data collection is invisible to the user.
my mobile phone service provider:/ knows where I am/ who I talk to/ when I talk to them/ who my friends are
the downside
life experience is recordedinformation use is tracked,advantage adheres to thosewho insert dams to pool eventswithin the flow of information
accepting loss of privacywith an ability to opt-out yields an enhanced product
offering
privacy issue is not dissimilarfrom copyright
Google Book SearchGoogle digitizes copyrighted materialprovides an innovative useful service and there is an opt-out option
Both are appropriations (without any apology)(with givebacks upon
request)that
enableuseful services.
[Information flow](on-line)
things people >> do
>> corporations >>>> governments
>>??
how well, really,do national governments
actually controlcorporations?andwhat is the relation ofpeople to government?
and therefore the relation of
people to their identitypeople to their privacypeople to their rights
as reading becomes a
social act
embedded within the network
all this is presentin how we decide
>> together <<
to shape reading --with our new books
contact info:
email: peter at diglib org
thanks!