Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quarterly Report
Prepared f,or
Regional Transportation Commis sisn (RTC)of Southern Nevada
500 S. Grand Central ParkwayLas Vegas, Nevada 89106
Evaluation of Performance of PavementMarkings for Clark County Roads
January 10,209{ Ø
Mohamed KasekoAssociate hofessor of Civil Engineering
Vinod VasudevanTransportation Systems Analyst
Siddhaflh DavidResearch Assistant
Transportation Research CenterHoward R. Hughes College of Engineering
University of Nevada, Las Vegas4505 Maryland Pmkway, Box 45400f
Las Vegas, NV 59L54-4007
Executive Summarv
The primary objective of this project is to perform field evaluations of pavement marking
products and identify those products that meet the performance criteria as specified and include
them in the qualified product list (QPL) maintained by the Regional Transportation Commission
(RTC) of Southern Nevada. Three types of products are evaluated based on their intended usage:
intersection markings, longitudinal markings, and raised pavement markers (RPMs). This report
presents details of the test deck results through the sixth set of field measurements for
retroreflectivity, color, and durability taken in October 2005 on the longitudinal products. The
fourth set of field measurements for RPM products that were also to be taken in October 2005
were not done due to faulty equipment. The equipment, ART-1200, had to be shipped back to the
vendor for repairs. It is expected that the equipment will be available for the January 2006
measurements. Products for longitudinal markings were installed on a section of the eastbound
Desert Inn Super-arterial. RPM test deck products were placed on Durango Drive between
Sahara Avenue and Desert Inn Road.
In general, each installed product is intended to provide a marking that will not distott
due to temperature if the surface of the pavement remains stable. The longitudinal products are
evaluated based on retroreflectivity, durability, and color (chromacity). Measurements of these
parameters on each product at each location are taken once every three months for two years.
Similarly, field measurements for retroreflectivity and durability for RPMs are taken at intervals
of three months for two years.
As reported previously, retroreflectivity and chromacity readings have dropped
significantly for all longitudinal products since installation. Some of these products have fallen
below RTC's current QPL specifications. Durability measurements for the longitudinal products
are almost all close to 95 percent or higher. Regarding RPM durability, some markers have lost
the reflective glass surfaces entirely. Also, a small amount of markers have broken glass surfaces
or broken as of the July 2005 measurement.
11
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.....List of Figures.....List of Tables
I.
il.
Introduction
Test Sites and Test Deck Design..Intersection MarkingsLongitudinal Markings....................Raised Pavement Markers (RPMs).
Products Installed on the Test Deck
Measurements of Field PerformancePavement Markin g Materi als
Retrorefl ective RPM Products
Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Pavement Marking Materials,Retroreflectivity Readings ..........Color Readings...Durability ReadingsPreliminary Evaluations..............
Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Raised Pavement Markers....Retroreflectivity Readings ...........
Durability Readings
VII. Tentative Dates for Future Data Collection
1
1
1aJaJ
4
7
10
ilr.
rv.
1
V
vI.
11
11
18
3l3'.7
393940
4l
lt1
List of Fisures
Figure 1:
Figure2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Placement of Test Markings at a Typical Intersection.............. ...................2
Placement of Polyurea Pavement Markings at an Intersection........ ............6
Placement of Tape Pavement Markings at an Intersection ........6
Measuring Chromacity and Retroreflectivity of Markings at Intersections ............,.....9
Measuring Retroreflectivity of Test Markings on the Desert Inn Test Deck ................9
Chromacity "N - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits ..........19
Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FFIWA Acceptance Limits ........1,9
Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........20
Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on ACSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits .............20
Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC Surface
Plotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........2I
Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCCSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits .............2I
Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........22
Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCCSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits .............22
IV
List of Tables
Table 1: Intersection Test Sites
Table 2: Intersection Marking Products
Table 3: Longitudinal Marking Products....
Table 4: RPM products...........
Acceptable Color Coordinate Regions and Luminance Factors ..............
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC ............
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on 4C...........
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyrrea Products on AC
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC .........
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC .........
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyrrea Products on PCC
Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC
Table 5:
Table 6:
Table 7:
Table 8:
Table 9:
Table 10:
Table 11:
Table 12:
Table 13:
Table 14:
Table 15:
Table 16:
Table 17:
Table 18:
Table 19:
Table2O:
Table2l:Table22:
Table23:
Table24:
Table25:
'table26:-lable 27:
Table 28:
Table29:
Table 30:
Table 31:
2
..5
..5
..8
12
13
t4L4
15
T6
n17
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on 4C.......
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on 4C.....
Color Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC.
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC.....
Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC...
Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC
Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC
Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC
Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on 4C.......
Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC
Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC
Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Polytrea Products on PCC.......
Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC.....
ASTM and FIfWA Chromacity Pass or Fail for Longitudinal Products
Retroreflectivity Readings for RPMs
..............23
..............24
..............25
..............26
'...,.'.'',,..21
..............28
..............29
..............30
..............32
..............33
..............34
..............34
..............35
..............35
..............36
..............36
..............38
..'..',,,.'.'.39
..............40Table 32:Durability readings for RPMs
I. Introduction
The primary objective of this project is to perform field evaluations of pavement marking
products and identify those products that meet the performance criteria as specified and include
them in the qualified product list (QPL) maintained by the Regional Transportation Commission
(RTC) of Southern Nevada. This list is used by the various local transportation and public works
agencies. Three types of products will be evaluated based on their intended usage, i.e., products
for intersection markings, products for longitudinal markings, and raised pavement markers
(RPMs).
This reporl presents details of the results of the initial through the sixth set of field
measurements for the pavement marking products for retroreflectivity, color and durability. The
sixth set of measurements was taken in October 2005, approximately fifteen months after
installation of the products. However, the equipment for retroreflectivity measurements of
RPMs, the ART 1200, was broken down at the time of taking measurements and had to be
shipped back to the vendor for repairs. It is anticipated to be back in time for the January
readings. As such, the latest readings available and presented in this report for the RPMs are the
July 2005 readings.
il. Test Sites and Test Deck Design
INTERSECTION MARKINGS
Products for intersection markings \¡/ere installed at selected intersections in the Las Vegas
Valley. The intersections are shown in Table I on the next page with their estimated approach
average daily traffic (ADT) for each direction. All intersections have asphalt concrete (AC)
surfaces. Four different products were installed on each intersection as stop bars and pedestrian
crossing lines, with each product installed on three different approaches of the intersection, as
shown in Figure l.
I
39,500/27,200Eastern Ave./Green Valley PkwyJ Henderson
2 Clark County35,500132,300Eastern Ave./lVarm Springs Rd.
Eastern Ave./Windmill Ln1 Clark County32,150/2r,300
JurisdictionLink ADTs
(North -S outhÆast-Westapproach)
Intersection
Table 1: Intersection Test Sites
PRDOUCT 1 PRODUCT2 PROD UCT 3
t777777774PRODUCT4
Figure 1: Placement of Test Markings at a Typical Intersection
2
I
¿lJ
+I
777,
EEE
z=
I
hgffi
II
LONGITUDINAL MARKINGS
Products for longitudinal markings Ìvere installed on a section of the eastbound Desert Inn (DI)
Super-arterial, between Valley View Boulevard and Paradise Road. This section of the road had
an estimated ADT of 43,100 combined both directions in year 2003 (source: Nevada Department
of Transportation (NDOT) Annual Traffic Report 2003). This test deck consists of two sections,
one on an asphalt concrete (AC) surface, and the other on a Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)
surface. Each product is installed on both surface types across the shoulder lane in 4-inch wide
transvorse stripes (Figure 5). Each product has four lines installed on each pavement surface.
RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS (RPMS)
RPM test deck products were placed on Durango Drive between Sahara Avenue and Desert Inn
Road, in the City of Las Vegas. This portion of Durango Drive consists of an asphalt concrete
surface with 6 through lanes (3 in each direction), and a two-way left turn lane (TWLTL). The
average annual daily traffic for this location was about 31,500 combined both directions (source:
Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) Annual Traffic Report 2003), Two types of
markers were placed on the test deck:
o White/red on the lane lines
o Yellow/yellow on the T'WLTL lanes
'White/red reflective RPMs were placed along skip lines at an interval of 40 feet between
markers. Yellow reflective RPMs were placed along the TWLTL lines at an interval of 40 feet
between markers. One hundred markers were placed per product. All RPMs on the test deck are
abrasion resistant.
J
ilI. Products Installed on the Test Deck
All pavement marking products were installed on the respective test decks during the week of
April 19, 2004. RPM installation was completed on June 10, 2004. Vendors were responsible for
installation of their products. Some vendors performed their own installations, while other
vendors hired contractors to install their products. Traffic control was provided by Advance
Traffic Safety (ATS) and the cost was split among the participating vendors in proportion to the
number of products installed. The vendors were billed directly by ATS. All installations were
done at night to minimize impact on traffic. For products installed at intersections, the l2-inch
wide markings were installed side by side with the existing markings. Tables 2 and 3 summarize
the products installed at the intersection sites as well as at the Desert Inn Super-arterial. Table 4
lists the products installed on the RPM test deck.
Table 2: Intersection Marking Products
TapeTape
1500 Durable,1600 Durable
Brite-Line Eastern / Green ValleyEastern / Green Valley
ATM Eastern / Green ValleyEastern / Green Valley
TapeTape
3000 Heavy Duty4000 Super Duty
PolyureaFIPS-5Ennis Eastern / Windmill
Swarco Eastern / WindmillEastern / Windmill
TapeTape
Director 60Director 90
Stamark 320lESStamark 420Stamark 1000
3M Eastem / Warm SpringsEastem / Warm SpringsEastern / Windmill
TapeTapePolyurea
LS90Epoplex Eastern /'Warm SpnngsPolwreaZttmar Eastern / Warm SpringsPref. ThermoplasticHotTape 90
MaterialProductVendor Intersection
4
YellowPolyureaHPS-5EnnisHPS-5Ennis WhitePolwrea
Epoplex YellowPolyureaLS90PolyureaLS90Epoplex White
3M YellowPolyureaStamark 1200
PolyureaStamark 12003M WhiteStamark 10003M YellowPolwrea
WhitePolyureaStamark 10003MStamark 380IES3M YellowTape
3M WhiteTapeStamark 380IESTape1600 DurableBrite-Line Yellow
Brite-Line WhiteTape1600 DurableBrite-Line YellowTape1500 Durable
Tape1500 DurableBrite-Line WhiteATM YellowTape4000 Super DutyATM WhiteTape4000 Super Duty
Tape3000 Heavy DutyATM YellowATM WhiteTape3000 Heavy Duty
YellowTapeDirector 90Swarco
Director 90Swarco WhiteTapeSwarco YellowTapeDirector 60
TapeDirector 60Swarco WhiteSwarco YellowTapeDirector 35
Director 35Swarco WhiteTape
ProductVendor ColorMaterial
Table 3: Longitudinal Marking Products
Table 4: RPM products
5
Vita-LiteSwareflex Yellow/YellowSwareflex whire/RedVita-LiteSwareflex YelloWYellowGlobemarker
WhirelRedGlobemarkerSwareflex921 ARApex Yellow/Yellow921 ARApex \Mhire/Red
Vendor Reflective ColorProduct
Figure 2: Placement of Polyurea Pavement Markings at an Intersection
Figure 3: Placement of Tape Pavement Markings at an Intersection
6
IV. Measurements of Field Performance
P AVEMENT MARKIN G MATERIALS
In general, each installed product is supposed to provide a marking that will not flow or distort
due to temperature if the surface of the pavement remains stable. The material shall show no
fading, lifting or shrinkage, significant tearing and other signs of poor adhesion which will
significantly impair the intended use of the marking.
During the project, the installed products are evaluated based on retroreflectivity,
durability, and color. Measurements of these parameters on each product at each location are
taken once every three months for one year for intersection markings, and for two years for
longitudinal markings at the DI Super-arterial. For retroreflectivity and color, measurements are
taken on each pavement marking on two locations per lane, one location on the wheel path (tire
track) and the other on the skip line. For example, an intersection marking that runs across five
lanes of traffic will have measurements taken at ten different locations. Longitudinal markings at
the DI Super-arterial shall have two measurement locations per marking stripe. An average of
three readings is recorded for each measurement location. The performances of the products are
reported against the cumulative number of vehicle passes computed based on 2003 ADT values.
Retrorefl ecti vity measurements
Retroreflectivity measurements are taken using the LTL-2000. This instrument simulates the
light emitted from vehicle headlights 30 meters from the observation point, and measures the
amount of light that would be reflected back to the driver. The value measured is called the
coefficient of retroreflective luminance (Rl), and is measured in SI units (mcd/m'llx¡.
Chromacitv measurements
Color measurements were taken using the BYK Gardner Color Guide. ASTM D 6628-03 and
FIIWA 23 CFR Part 655 standards were used as criteria to evaluate color properties of the
materials. Both standards use the CIE 1931 Color System. Color coordinates ("x" and "y")
represent hue on a two-dimensional coordinate system, and a luminance factor ("Y") records the
lightness. Both standards give four coordinates (x¡ through x+, yt through y+) that identify an
1
acceptable region, or "box", where the measured color coordinates of the products would be
considered acceptable (see Figure 6, for example). Luminance readings for pavement markings
are also required to meet minimum limits, Yn¡n (see Figure J , for example). The FTIWA standard
also specifies maximum limits, Y-u*, for certain types of markings. Table 5 shows the acceptable
color coordinate region and luminance factor limits for each standard. Both standards require that
color coordinates and luminance for a marking satisfy these limits throughout the servìce life of
the marking.
Table 5: Acceptable Color Coordinate Regions and Luminance Factors for Each Standard
150.4120.4380.5200.4190.4420.551o.4I20.498FIIWA Yellow 45
400.3290.2740.3930.3400.3660.3680.3000.303FHWA White
250.4000.4600.4400.4200.5100.490o.4400.560ASTM Yellow
350.3150.335o.3250.2850.3050.3050.3550.355ASTM'White
X1Standard/Color Yrnu*Y-i.Y+X4YtX3YzXZYt
To satisfy the color requirements for a given standard, the "x" and "y" readings for a product
must fall within the acceptance "box" while the corresponding "Y" reading has to be within the
required minimum and maximum values of the respective standards. Both the ASTM and FFIWA
standards specify a minimum acceptable value for "Y", while the FIIWA also specifies a
maximum limit. For both the "x", "y" and "Y" criteria, the FHWA requirements are generally
more restrictive than ths ASTM requirements.
Durability measurements
Durability is a measure of how much of the marking material remains on the pavement surface in
satisfactory working condition at the time of data collection. Durability measurements are
subjective, and shall be based on ASTM D 913 and are reported in percentage. Two evaluators
estimate the durability of each line and the ayerage of these two readings constitute the durability
measurement for the marking.
8
I
gIrË
,-,JL
ölë*¡ l, "
ii 4¡i .
rÍf rr
a
..1 - :
Figure 4: Measuring Chromacity and Retroreflectivity of Markings at Intersections
Figure 5: Measuring Retroreflectivity of Test Markings on the Desert Inn Test Deck
9
RETROREFLECTNE RP M PROD U CTS
Field measurements for retroreflectivity and durability are taken for each product at
approximately three-month intervals. For each product, measurements are taken on one of every
four markers, for a sampling raþ of 25Vo.
Retr-orefl ecti vity measurç¡qe.nts
Refforeflectivity measuremerits were taken using the ART-1200 instrument. Measurements are
taken using the 0.2 degree observation angle geometry, simulating the view of a driver of the
observation point. The standæd SI unit of measure for reüoreflectivity (RI) is mcd/lx.
Durability measurements
Durability is measured as a proportion of markers remaining in place and in good physical
condition. Forlost markers, a distilction is made between those lost due to failure of the bonding
between the adhesive and the markers, or between the adhesive and the pavement surface.
10
V. Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Pavement Marking Materials
This section reports and summarizes observations for the field measurements for
retroreflectivity, chromacity, and durability taken approximately fifteen months after installation
of the longitudinal products. Field measurements for intersection products were completed in
April 2005 and the final values, evaluations and recommendations for these products have
already been presented to the RTC. These products are not discussed in this report.
RETRO REF LE CTIV ITY READ IN G S
Tables 6 through 13 present the retroreflectivity readings for each longitudinal product and type
of surface. The results show a wide range of performance, from retroreflectivity values in the
low 30's to the high of 400. Once again, some readings are higher than the readings for the
previous period due to the fact that these latest readings were taken about a week after a
rainstorm. Overall, as expected, white products performed better than yellow products. Between
the AC and PCC surfaces, the overall performance was relative similar. Howevet, polyrrea
products generally performed better on the PCC surface than on the AC surface. A more detailed
analysis by products is included in the Preliminary Evaluations section later in this report.
11
232?2529738029:82544t7SkioAr.eæ 58'/-9o
4AJ%156139140231217238442Ttre Thâeks
63349r379%LShp Ateas L78.Wo&9NI451
1A19Vo3ffiæ9318y7Nïñt319TirelÏack
w1',73tïtwSkipAfeås 56.3%tÐ113186
2I.l4o,493249lm741ß'mTïe Tracks
BLldnDi¡rihle2ffiSkip A¡eæ 42.5.yb,106q+?ffiw190154
251TfueT¡aela. %.Wo5859631ß96t25BL1500D¡uable
t:t.wat6_rq_2@¿tJ23:lw437,Skip Areas
4:nllfe lrac(s 16.39r.nil6761æln188
AlIlvI 4fifi Suo€rDutvS.Hp Areas 619{aw316w,497416381w,
35.47o2Í7212188zr32U3105MTheTrael$ATIú3000ïIeawD¡¡tr¡
2984e)w306wSlip Areas SZT A2UnßTire.Tlãcls 44,V/o2t518917429¿n8?&479
S,r,larco l)¡ector90
2322134?AN'7n4595StiD,Aæqs M.Wo2lJ3
578tÍe lräcKs ?ß.7%16144130xtl2A!9?Æ
Sçarco Diie-etor @
ffi.6iønlx80ruw215193301SiPArsas
49.AVo149wtn190%1n9N2TireTlacksSuarcoDirætor35
4Ww][email protected] \rehicle P'æses
(ffiO)nerthmiane
31-0etn-Jvl1ÈAor19-JanSNovil"Jul19AprfDate sf installation), zffi?Mhduetsand %Qiginal
RoadtnC
Reta¡ned
V/hiteTape tAC
Table 6: Retroteflectivity Results ror Longitudinal Whife Tape ProductÊ on AC Surface
12
?36Skip-Areæ 86.6%190t5119826s2''L181,
179,toTlre Tþacks 6O17Vo732I22123184176A¡eraÈe
Skio Arear 216'247YTx61907M 139'AEo287
2,3,I2ß193ïreTraclß 121.440235l9tM318
3il4SÞmik380IESSlçinArcas 59u013510377ln 85.Mo105
llre lËtcKs 423555w4969119 35.5Vo
BI-16mDûabletntytSkip Aæas W,.WÒ1042Al
1U2
158
î43t25119
183The Tracks 48'Wo58
BL1500Durâble7n 88
161
?AD293Skip Aæas '76.4%n3nm?Æn82AI
18fig17+tn309TireTrack 4.r,SVo12ßt8ATII4 4000Supe.rDuty
ztl198SkiÞ Arcas lW,1qo2tB1882t729Aztfr1932BrT3TftBTirac1a 71.5Vøta16/129187
Aïlvf 3000lle.avy DufY
4ffiSþ Areas t4Ð\Wffi2t92n 369%150
1mrgz174T4llna Tracts 26,44aÐ11594
Swarco Directorg0
163WskiÞ ertns 83.1%t1861431792522ß188r71'n6TrreTmcls 7I"Zqa1æ137:1432i0
Swarco Direstor,60
Slnþ Ateas 1952W'w380ß62v2t3 ffi2%w'2562A3TræTrack 7A.Maflat471Ðls3
Srwarco Director35
6610Cl¡m¡IativeVehiclePasse¡
f000)perthn¡ hno'4#B32Et2ß22,rq15!4n
2GJull Aor 3l-ûctn:hl19-Aor19J¿¡n3.Nov
2M[Daþ of instdlstion) 2005
hducts md % Original
Bsading
RÊtahed
YellowTaBc on A(}
Table 7: Retrmefleetivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products Õn AC Surfaee
13
Table 8: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface
White on AC:
Table 9: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface
Yellow on AC: :
Arærage
Tlre TlacksAreas
42.8Vo
51^.3Vo
254227
262
388
192228
4s8
457
t34216
274
340
161
300
3M Starrark 1000
3M Stanark 1200
Ennis HPS-5
þoplexIS90
Tire TrackSkip Areas
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire Tmcla
Skp Areas
Tire Tmcks
Shp Areas
10.8Vo
80.Wo
47.47o
56.47o
21.3Vo
29.6Vo
25.77o
39.3Vo
IO162
226
238
3û287
28zn
142
250
205
390
Jt I
515
7ZJ
397
80
123
158
t6
n5329
255
295
519
562
580
5U
3Q368
94
186
2A358
t79
2r1308
lX
89
171
233
494
205
274
149
2t6
218
2n
42t519
118
'254
3t3313
62
119
Grmrlative Vehicle Pas s es
('000) per thru lanetn51422610 ñ2332572622
hoducts and
(Date of installation)
%ùJ'gnalReading
Retained
Date of Reading:
2W19-Apr 2GJul
2æ5
l9-Jan ; l9-Apr 3l-Oct3-Nov D-Jú
Arærage
Tlre Thacks
SkipAreas
33.7 Vo
48.lVo3543s8
199
186
184
253
189
282109
20687
154120163
3M Stannrk 1000
3M Stannrk 1200
Ennis HPS-5
þoplexlS9O *
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire TrackSkip Areas
Tire Tracla
Skip Areas
Tire Tracla
Skip Areas
38.17o
53.6Vo
û.67o86.97o
10.47o
15.7%o
25.7Vo
36.37ol
244
265
144'131
4n432
103
136
r39
245
'256
372
236
320
106
188
146
267
2rÐ
3'A
2&348
45
93
56
lv
tz7194
lz2lsl
16L50
118
210
63
96
101
ta7
n4A2
D62t2
58
lv
71
189
t63231
IA25t
t76r82 116
0Cum¡lative Vehicle Pas s es
(000) per thm lane1915 | 2622 1, 3291 : ñn6t t422
Products and
@ate of installation)
ToUgnalReading
Retained
Date of Reading:
2W19-Aprl2GJul r3-Nov
2æs
19-Jan 22-Jtl, 31-Oct
!+ hoduct placed on Gl7-04: cum¡lative vehicle passes at tìrrc of last neasurenrnt was 2,198,000
l4
Table 10: Retrorefleetivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Product$ o.n PCC Surtace
SkÍpÂr,eæ 55JVo2.2Å2Í0?rt830s3532804,25
vrg421ïlre ïþæks 29,$Vo118951302022ß2A'¡etæe
Lts3%40328s381488431330350skipAreas4&w325TÍeftacla 87,WoffiwT16500
3N4Stan:a&3mIES
851Ð1621811&f148X1$<ipfueas 35.\Eo
87ïhèTr"¿elß 15.@o1í7T93875T316BL1ffiÞüable
13912618-1a5m16l2ffi v,4,qo
18:.8qa4830w113113w?57TfoeTÍackBI-l5ffiDu¡able
3t7301418SkþArcæ; 45ßlp190186t1,LNL9.t%38S:I74106
,?A9t9418TirelìækAïÌvI40mSuoerDuff
4Ø548Skbl\æ¿rs 6t.8%33S358y7Mffi3m317ffilite lÍacKs 2A.7EoI91ß1932ø
ATTvI30üItuwD¡tvSlipAreas &.699:2ßLfi,2NYT3833õ5.ffi
138130'w3CI6ñ2TreTraele D'SVa177
S\¡elco DiîËctorg0
vxS*iaA¡€as- 3l.4Vo%tl%1258N47óyl142101130LWM:)ffiv,nIÌre lfacKs ß.6%
$raico Director60
1S252'SkiD Areas 57.Mot4r49t%1957nt76155mtfie lrâcKs M.M886285l:&:
SørcoDæctor35
rgríl$n6T0O¡ru¡lative rr'ehieb Pæscs
ffffi)perthrulauç4gBw26n
}'1.{ovruutl9Aor 31,&r?-Jt;J.1trApr19Jan
m5M(Date-0-f instellatioa)
7otþinalReading
ktained
Date o.f-Reading:Ià¡ducts ¿urd
lfuiteTaoesnftniçrete¡
15
Table 11: Retrsrefleetivity Results forLongitudinal Yellow Tape Produût$ on PCC Surface
250Skip.Areas &99o196ftz194249n5194
163249Tlre 4839-oL1280113tfft2t5Arer&o
S,kio Areas 153ffi28tuû18it278 II8:79o.259
ú8i7an5Iîe lfacKs ffiIYa'199143rn?41
3MStar¡rilrk380[FS
,Skip Areas 7088105B73w 45;SVp55
l.fie lriacKs 304s6l4759119 37
BLltrEu¡abb3LZVo
179125193 8,it.4E6Lsl111141188
59lffit26u010E190TAe 46,VBL1500Durable
89
v5,MSkipAnas 75,r%añ729l33043CI495
w2193927341LTircTracls 2A\%I8'3
.{ïM4000SuuerDufy
196teSkip Areas 147.ïVawn0r99B8313
'2A9776r68T,ïeTfåck$ û,5Vø1017:l130167
AIïvI30@'Ileavy Duty
Sldp Á.reas 39AVO150743158230n02Ð382
163166wïre]}äelc 24.6%9192.%,ïvSwarcoDirector90
TØzßSkip Areas Ð*5V¿184t4l176zÐn0tw1ß%TireTracls e.wr43111119lSrl
SwarcoDhectorffi
SftbAre¿x zLA2:ñ25:TNil3Un6?ß9 7?;5Va
7ß32r0288TheTracks 47."4{a137,79L14zffiSwareoDirector35
wn6t0Ch¡rulative Yehicle P¿s ses
f000)Berthru laaeAgn32VL'Æn1915
20Jul19.Apr 3l-Oet?9-Tú19"Aor19-Jan3.fübv
2@4(Þ¿te of irrst¡¡llarion) 206ftoducts and %Odgiael
kadingRetâined
&llowTaþeo¡'Ooncæte:
16
49.3Vo
58.5Vo
516
501
242
258
321357
310
392
2t6301
161
223 2932s0
ArerageTlre TlacksSkipAreas
13.67o
'l8.3Vo
'71.7%
83.1Vo
11.8Vo
29.2%o
'4.27o
43.4Va
5t3
3y
Ø1613
562
5&
481
415
lsl229
2t2309
426
535
M494
130
194
t43241
331
n3
2û358
234
n7
324
305
2M262
220
2q7
493
503
363
398
!
t28t54
w133
n3468
354
372
258
329
2U2A
115
r79
96
148
211
233
t62189
3M Stannrk 1000
3M Stanark 1200
Ennis HPS-5
EpoplexlS90
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire TraclsShp Areas
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire Tracks
Skp Areas
Orm¡lative Vehìcle Pas ses
('000) per thru lane2622,3291 .ñ23t4226r0 1975
VoOngnalReading
Retained
Date of Reading:
2W19-Apr ' 2GJul
2tn5
l9-Jan 31-Oct19-Apr I 22-Jtl3-Nov
hoducts and
@ate of installation)
Table 12: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC Surface
White on Concrete:
Table 13: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC Surface
'Yellow on Concrcte:
l*hoductplacedon Gll-V;cumrlativevehiclepasses attineof lastûeasurenæntwas . 2,198,000
Arerage
Tlre Tracks
SkipAreas
51.57"
60.lVo
271
269
1s9
166206208
184
247
136 . 99
201 ¡ 138
155
183
3M Starnrk 1000
3M Starrnrk 1200
Ennis HPS-5
þoplextS90
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Tire Tracls
Skip Areas
ll4.57o
116.57o
Q.1%
67.57o
15.87o
18.97o
149Vo
17.57o
137
r31
493
485
452
455
42
50
97
195
267
332
332
413
t]t9
42
s2
t62r0
20
51
78
s2
2Æ
280
n4308
234
325
'36
38
ffi'43
353
338
24
4l
6'7
159
35
32
lÆIN
\12
znAI251
217
n7217
AI
13l
14
2622 32n ' 4923tvt5t4D6l0Currulative Vehicle Pas s es
('000) per thru lane
ToGgnd,Reading
Retained
Date of Reading
2W 2W5
l9-Jan , 19-Apr 22-Jtll9-Apr , 2GJul SNov -Oct3l
hoducts and
(Date of instalJation)
11
COLOR READINGS
Tables 14 through 21 present the chromacity readings for each product and test location. Figures
6 through 13 show the color readings for each product plotted on against the ASTM D 6628-03
and FIfWA 23 CFR Part 655 acceptance limits. Figures 6, 8, 10, and 12 present product
performance based on acceptance limits for the x and y readings. Similarly, Figures 7 ,9, ll, and
13 present product performance based on the "Y" value.
For white longitudinal products, the x and y chromacity readings for all products were well
within the acceptance regions under both the ASTM and FFfWA standards (Figures 6 and 8).
However, the luminance factor "Y" readings have reduced significantly for all longitudinal
products since placement and are all below the minimum specified in both ASTM and FIfWA
standards (Figures '7 and 9). Tape products have retained the highest percentage of the initial
luminance ("Y") readings. Also, the luminance factor "Y" for products on the AC test deck were
generally higher than on the PCC test deck.
For the yellow longitudinal products, the chromacity readings have reduced substantially more
than the white products from their initial values for the x and y readings as well as the "Y"
readings. With respect to the x and y readings, all but one of the products fell outside of both the
FFIWA and ASTM acceptance ranges (Figures 8 and 12). A complete listing of the status of each
product with respect to the chromacity thresholds is presented in Table 30 in the Preliminary
Evaluations section.
18
0.40
0.35
0.30
o'25 o'30 x coordinate
o'35 o'40
Figure 6: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC Surface PlottedAgainst ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits
Yendor and hoduct
Figure 7: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits
ã
oo
Whíte-Skip @lwhite-Tire ¡ ¡'ASTMWhiteMin
-FH\ryAWìiteMin50
45
û35
^? 30
(!
=25¡-20
15
10
5
0ôØJ
ooo
lll
ON
>'Ø
Ooo
Øz
H
oI
¡êo
Jcq
oIHoI
-Ø
Øôts
ÉÉ
f¡ì
ao
Ø
HØOOo
?
!
ooo
k
Oôoo
ìØ
ØHæ
àØz
-FWIIAWhite- - ASTMWhite
tr Skip Area Readings
x Tire Track Readings
I
_lI
I
I
_lI
I
I
_lI
I
I
rtr(tr.i-l-
llIIlì
___I___ ltìtttt
___I___ 1ttttll
___-L___-!tltlll
___l___ llltltl
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
t-I
I
I
I
d
l//-r---/r---
itrt/ \l---
I
I
I
TI
I
I
I
I
I
I
TI
T-
T
T
---1 -l---
tllltl-l----¡tltltt
l- - |
ttttìll- --ltltltl'l----ltltltl
I
I
I
II
I
I
1I
I
I
I
rl
18
141415 15
118
202121
n
7 ß11
20 2ß
t9
0.55T
T
l
f
ttrItrl_ttt'- I f I
ttlfTlltt- l--f I
ttt
ttlrtlrtt
-_r- - | Irtt_ttÌtttt-- | Trtt
0.50
0.40
0.35
0.40 0.4s 0.50x coordinate
0.55 0.60
Figure 8: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC Surface PlottedAgainst ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits
Yellow-Skip @YellLow-Tire r r . ASTM Yellow Min.
-FHWA
Yellow Min. -':- FHWA Yellow Max
50
45
Yendor and hoduct
Figure 9: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits
5.40
cÉ
¡<oI>¡
n35
=30Cg
=25¡-20
15
10
5
0 OqØJoÊoof!
OON
Øz
Øù
ÉÊ
f¡l
OO
à(h
Hoo
¡c0
oO
¡cô
!ØOo
F
OI!oHìØ
oI
Ø
HiE
OO
L<
oôoc>Ø
ØHOæ
Ø
F
F
ts
ts
t+
+
+
tlr- - ts - -t- - + -rtt- h- l- + -
rtt- - ts - -t- - + - -
ttt--ts--t f -ttt
F
ts
F
ts
Yellow
- - ASTM Yellow
D Skip Area Readings
x Tire Track Readings
t
t
I
tr
tr
tr
t+
-t I
t
2
,ztr t-
tr
rtr
l
f
a
l
tr
T
tt1 t-tl
-1trtt1tr¡trtr/
ìtr
ttì_ Itt
I -Ttt1_- rtt
-Tlt
I
-l¡
-----t _
I-I
-t--I
lttllatlrï - -t- - -lttrT__l---r -tlr_ t--t- --tlr
t - -t- - -t - -tttt_l--t--t- a-tltl
-t--f I iltlr
--f
I
-tr1
tttttrttttllt
-r r I r
11 tO 10 11
88
14 l4t415
20
20
0.40ttlltllltlllI_ ¡ I - - tr f
-l
-
rlllttllrtllr -- - | trtttltrtltrllI -t-'-- | trltlltttltrllt- I _l--- htìllttllttll
tlt¡tif1llttllTIttItlltsttlllllts -ftttttt
-l
0.35
0.30
0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40x coordinate
Figure 10: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits
Vendor and Product
Figure 11: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FHWA Acceptance Limits
d
E¡r
'Whire-Skip lRlwhite-Tirc ¡ - rASTMWhiteMin
-F[{WAWhrteMin50
45
Q
35
530cË
- t(
¡-20
l5
l0
5
0
tr!oþìØ
oooo
õØ
oIAoIØ
oôCò¡xÈoaf¡l
oOd
àØ
HØOoOt
F
Øfrãdt¡l
ôÍOOO
F-
oooàØz
ØGJ
o
Ø
ooIJÊa
HO
¡ca
- L- t---
--t-- -L-
I
I
I
!I
I
I
+
F
t,/
/'l
'i. \
ì
l
llllrltltltlllll
-FWHAWhite- - ASTMWhite
¡ Skip Area Readings
x Tire TrackReadings
- -: --r---
I
---t---
tr7,
'/
i\
ts
12 tz14u 14 74t5 15
tq 192r zo
1012
1616
lolo lo s
16 t5
27
0.55
0.50
v
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.40 0.45 0.50x-coordinate
0.55 0.60
Figure 12: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC Surface
Plotted Against ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits
Vendor and hoduct
Figure 13: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC Surface
Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits
Yellow-Skip E:l:t.-tYellow-Tire - - -ASTMYellowMur
-FHWAYellowMm
-..É*FF{WAYellowMa)c50
45
40
35
c!
i-20
15
10
5
0IHo
Ø
HobÈØ
âØOo
F
H:EOoo
F
OâHoo!d
Ø
Øô.
Él¡l
Õ6ØJoÀo
fr.l
ON
Øà
Oo
Ø
aOo
¡Ê0
Øûlo
àØà
aO€Jcq
KG+ãt-
- FHWA Yellow
- - ASTM Yellow
D Skip Area Readings
x Tire Track Readings
.7d xF..l
á
x,LËa
\\
\
88 lo 11 1l to11
8.11oql1 ro
16 ts15 15
89
22
Table 14: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC Surface
White on AC:
AEr-qg". "
Tlre TiacksAreas
Swarco Director 35
Swarco Director 60
Swarco Director 90
ATM 3000Heavy DutyTire Tracks
ATM 4000 SuperDuty ",
Tire Tracks
Skip- Areas
BL 1500 Durable
- Tire Track
, Qkip Arqag
BL 1600 Durable
3M Starrark 380IES
Tire Tracks
Areas
Areas
AI.pp
Areas
Shp Areas
Skip.ôpql
Tire Tracla
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracks
C\mulative Vehicle Pas s es
thru lane
@ate of installation)
Products and
0.318 0.338 60 0.328 0.345 16 0.325 0.343 16 0.322 0.340 23 0.325 0.343 t718
0.327 0.344 t5 0.323 0.341 19
0.324 0.342 t80.318 0.338 63 0.327 0.344 19 0.323 0.341 13 0.322 0.341 24 0.323 0.341 0.327 0.343 l4
0.320 0.339 71 0.331 0.341 23 0.330
0.319 0.338 14 0.328 0.346 28 0.328
0.318 0.331 69 0.328 0.344
0.343
22 \sn 0344
0.317 0.336 74 0.326 27 0.324 034t
0.319 0.339 & 0.328 0.346 15 0.328
0.342 Il0.342 16
03M0.346
ù ons0325
0.344
0.343
0342
0.343
26 0.328 0.345 24 0329 0.346 16 0328 0345 2t29 0.327 0.345 23 0.329 0.346 18 0.328 0.345 t9
l815
18
l6
25
24
0324
0.3u.0:326 0.34.4
032s 0.342
0.330 0.345 15 0.324 0342 18
0.341
0.342
0.322 0.341 20 0.321 0.345 20 0.321 0.340
0.321 03N 25 0325 0.344 t8 0.323 0.342
18
t] 0.328 0.343 13 0.325 0.342 t6
0.342 16 0.321 0.345 13 0.329 0.346 lr 0.323
0.342 18 0.323 0.340 ll 0.326 0.343 l0 0.3230.319 0.338 6t 0.327 0.345 21 0.324
0.321 0342 69 0.325 0.343 15 0.323 0.340
0.3390.321 0.343 ß 0.326 0.344 15 0.322
0.315 0.335 13 0.328 0.34s li o.zzs ß;420.315 0.335 73 0.329 0.345 14 0323 0.341
0.346 . t.?
0.:342 19
0.323, 0.340 17
0.322 0.339 20
ì¿12
0.321 0339 26
3r0.321 0.340
0.323
0.323
t613
0.326
0.322
03n 28 0.342 11
0342 28 0.34t 25
0.321
ún 9.]!4 11
0.343 17
0.319 0.3N M0.319 0.339 52
0.320 0.341
0.3400320
0.3 t6
0.327 0.343 15
0.325 0.342 11
9.32+. 0.343
0.322 0.340
t2 0.322
10 0.321
0.326
0.323
0.343 12
0.339 t40.326 0.343
0.326 0.342
0323
0.323
43 0.326 0.343
48 0.326 0.344
t3 0.325
t6 0.320
0.343 12 0321 0:339 ?o0.339 19
0.325 0.343 12 0.326 0.343 t3 0.322 0.341 16
0.339 9 0.321 0.323 03N 13 0.327 0.343 11 0.323 0342 20
43 0.328 0.346 13 0.322 0.339 17 0.318 0.337 24 0.321, 0.340 18 0.326 0.344 13 0.322 03N 18
50 0.329 0.346 16 0.321 0.340 13 0.318 0.338 23 0.321 0.3,m rc 0.325 0.342 12 0.322 0.342 200.3 t40.336
0.335
r9750 6l 1422 2622 3216 4¡,23
YX YX Yx Yx YX YX YX
19-Jan 19-Apr 19-Jul 31-Octl9-Apr 2GJul 3-Nov
2005
of ReadingDate
2W%orignalYReadingRetained
29.4Va
32.0Vo
2I.8Vo
11.9Va
3e.1E?
3I.lVa
T,þ.vo28.07o
36.,7:'/:
30.87a
25.7Vo
21.0%
25.87a
30.07o
37.lVa
40.9Va
4l.2Vo
40.07o
23
Table 15: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC Surface
Yellow on AC:
Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es
thru lane
@ate of installation)
Products and
A
ski AreasTire Ttacks
Swarco Director 35
Ti'e Tracks
Swarco Director 60
Swa¡co Director 90
ATM 3000 Heavy DutyTire Tracks
ATM 4000 SuperDutyTire Tracks
BL 1500 Durable
BL 1600Dumble
. ....$kip Are_ag
3M Starnark 380IES
Tire Tracls
Tire Tracks
Areas
Areas
Shl Areas
Skip Areas
Skp Areas
Ti¡e Tmcks
Sha $,paq
Tire T¡ack
Tire Track
1422 r9150 661 2622 3276 4¡,23
Yx YX YX Yx Y YX YX X
Date of Readins
19-Jan l9-Apt 19-Jul 31-Oct2GJul 3-Nov
2cn5
19-Apr
2W
0.410 13
0.412 t30.480 0.452 37 0.431 0.419 12 0.418 0.413 12 0.432 0.424 l7 0.422 0.416 13
0.411 0.404 11 0.413
0.413 0.405 11 0.411
0.483 0.4s3 39 0.441 0.424 14 0.408 0.405 9 0.430 0.424 t6 0.422 0.417 13
0.494 0.462 q 0.4s1 0.430 ls 0.435
0.491 0.4Ø 46 0.463 0.431 18 0.430
0.426
0.423
13 0.425 0.418
A oAry 0.406
- -0,+:o0.43r
0.420 t20.416 l1
0418 20
0:418 17
0.440 0.431
0.436 0.430
l5t4
.9.Q\0.4r9
l3 0.446 ddi 1.2 o.q+z 'o.nt
ist2 0.454 0.442 19 0.446 0.433 15
11 0.413 0408 9 0.419 0415 11 04t1 04ll 9 0418 0407 9 0405 0M 80.487 0.458 32 0.442 0.425
0.490 0.4ñ 36 0.454 0.434 14 0.398 0.398 1 0.415 0.411 10 0.408 0.405 1 0.410 0.4a 7 0.N3 0.405 8
1 0.446 0.435 18 0.436' 0.428 13 0.428 0.4t2 lr 0.405 0.401 t40.49t
0.491
0.4û .71 0:47 9.-+26
0.4(fr 31 0.452 0.430
0.472 0.448 4'7 0.424 g"4ls
0.4210.4'72 0A48 4'7 0.43r
0.435 0.427 14 0.41û 0.431 13 0.429 0.417 10 0.4n 0.421 12
0.415 0.455 48 0.431 0.422 t4 0.443 0.433
0.416 0.455 49 0.438 0.426 15 0.431 0.426
10 0.416
8 0.409
2r .9.42623 0.425
0.394
0.401
0.4s4 0.445 29 0.444 0.433
0:438
0.425
0.421
2,0
l8
1?" ".9411
rs .9.12J
0.Æ0.391
0.454 0.445 29 0.443
13 0.430 o.nï' ù o.n+ 0.411 14
8 0.429 0.4U 17 0.418 0.41,6 13
0Áæ 0.403 11 0.398 0.400 t00.406 0.399 ll 0.403 0.405 11
0.399 9 0.402 0.398 9 0.405
0.406
0.4M 11
0.4M 9 0.398 0.394 9 0.M 10
0.394 0.395 9 0.399 0.Æ6 .!.2
0.405 ll
0.482
0.485
o:HJ"
-0.1+_8,
32 0.421 0.411 1l 040? 9401 e
0.394 0.393 7
0.M0.4tJ2
0.414 0.411
0.419 0.416
t2t3
0.403
0.40835 0.438 0.422 13
0.413 0.449 21 0.418 0.413 Ll 0.n20.478 0.452 -31 0.42,9, ^0.411 lt 0.397
0.461 0.435
0.439
30 0.411 0.42 11 0.4t2 0.460.473 34 0.420 0.405 13 0.4U 0.399
11, 0.391 o 398 ?t2 o.Qt 0.403 10
0.474 16 0.4t6 0.408
0.ß6t4
0.4t7 17 0.411 12
0.4r1
0.M 0.386 0.388 8 0.399
13
r00.421
0.428"0,39q0.395
l0 0.411 0.405.
12 0.413 0.,108i3t4
7a orirgnalYReadin,e
Retained
ls3'-E:32.44o
37.5Va
30.77o
37,!V_o
37.67o
q5%36.7Va
ns7..43.,8V9.
29.5Vo
20.9Va
22.8Va
25.3Va
34.j%o
22.4Vo
44.5Vo
4l.7Vo
24
White on AC:
Table 16: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface
thru lane
Vehicle Passes
@ate of installation)
Products and
SK
Tire TiacksAreas
A\Er3ge"_*
3M Starna¡k 1000
3M Starnark 1200
Ennis HPS-5
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Ti¡e Track
Areas
Areas
rs90lex
Tire Tmcks
Tire Tracls
Y Yx YX Yx Yx YX X
0342 t80.3240325 0.344 150.3 19 0.339 60 0 .327 0.344 2t 0.32s 0.343 0.323 0.341 I 0.32s 0.343 0.327 0.344
0.319 0.339 62 0.325 0.344 26 0.323 0.341 12 0.322 0.340 21 0.323 0.341 14 0.328 0.34s 13
t5 0.324 0.340 t6 0.326 0.343 t4 03n 0344 t2 0.326 0.343 13
9 0.322 0.339 t3 0.324 0.339 9 0.330 0.345 t2 0.324 0.342 15
17
18
0.320
0322
18
0.342 0.3260.317 0.339 61 0.325 0.344 25 0.322
0.3t1 0.338
0.31',7 0.338 6s 0.323 0.341 33 0.324 0.343 15
0.317 0.337 63 0.328 0.346 28 0.325 0.343 19
0.342 30 0.323
0.324 0.343
L7
0.329 0.344 19
0.327 0.346 t5 0.325
0.346 15
18 0.326
0.340
0323 0.340
0342
0.340.341
2t 0".321
15 0.32t
0.340
0.34r
24
24
13
ll
0.14s
o'34?
110.?20 _9:319. þ3.0?,.K_0.344 23-_.0.323 0.341 e...0.322
0.32t _034A "sS q+6 9.34) 14..0-328
0.321 0.341 58 0.326 0.345 22 0324
þ3_ 0.3_?6_,p3y_ 2! 93"?3.,9;?42
0323
0.323
0.339 19 0.324 0.340
323 0.340 t6 0.324 0.343
0.342 22 0.321 0342 ',A 0.328 0.345
0.344 20
0.327 03420.325 0.341 11 0.3230.340 60 0.326 0.343 11 0.325 0.343 14 0.
03260.3u
0.].11
0.343
6I 19150 t422 2622 3276 4îJ23
x Y
2005
l9-Jan3-Nov 19-Jull9-Apr 2GJul 31-Oct
of Readins
37.27a
27.5Va
23.8Vo
23.2Vo
24.lVo
28.4Va
26.6Vo
22.5Vo
7o OrÌgnalYReadingRetained
29.ïVo24.5Vo
25
Table 17: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface
YellowPo on AC:
Tire TiacksAEragç
"
3M Starrnrk 1000
3M Starrark 1200
Ennis HPS-5
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracla
Tire Tracks
*
Areas
Areas
Tire Tracks
Areas
Cumulative Vehicle Pas ses
thru lane
@ate of installation)
a¡rd
YX YX YX YX YX Yx YX
19-Apr 2GJul 19-Jan 19-Jul 3l-Oct3-Nov
2æ5
19-Apr
2MDate of
0í6q q.J_lt "l"l 0.49: _0.41s 16 0.42t 0.40e 14 0.42s.0..41s 17.0.41s 0.406 13,. 0.402 .0.394 t2 0.4.06 0.401 12
0.398 0.390 10 0.403 0.399 t20.334 31 0.455 0.425 21 0.409 0.402 l0 0.425 0.417 17 0.408 0.403 110.368
T4
12
0.494
0.395
0.492 0.444 44 0.430 0.Æ7 11 0.411 0.401
-- 0.& 0.44t 35 0.418 0.415 13 0.432 0.429
0.+n 29 0.428 0.421 t9 0.433 0.430
0.40 0.410 15 0.399
0.421 0.417 2t 0.397 0.395
t9 0.411 0.407 12 0.400 0.391
--: ö.4i613
t2
11 0.405 0..39-3 9
9 0.399 0.388 9"0.400.
e. 0.416 o.ry rc 0.420 o.pl.-r? g4-1?,""94p3
0.421 15 0.4il 0.400 9 0.415 0.410 12 0.4A2 0.399
10, .0i4157 0.418
14 0.43r1t 0.436
0.415
0.421
0.410.410
25
24
15
l5
0.415 0.405
0.416 0.M
t2
t2
12
t20.s01 0.448 44 0.422
0.500 0.448 43 0.458
0441,F ory 0.416 14 0.32, 0.388
12 0.4rr o.Nr 12 0.398 ., 0.390 .10 01401 *9.44213 0.4tJ2 0.398 9 0.394 0.386 9 0.4M 0.401
12 0.4rs_ 0.N1
9 0.lm1 0.396
0.386 0.389
0.391 0.392
0.478 0.439 38 0.452 0.420 t9 0.411 0.Mo 478 0.439 37 0A41 0.414 15 0.430 0.472
0 6l 14.22 r9'75 2622 3n6 ñ23
VooriginalYReadingRetained
30.9Va
33.2Va
37.1v1
31.07a
Z7.LVa
28.3Vo
28.9Va
26.4Vo
4O.2Va
36.6Va
26
White on C-oncrete:
Table 18: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC Surface
Tire Tbacks
Areas
Swarco Director 35
Swarco Director 60
Swarco Director 90
AT.\4 4Oq Super.Duty
Tire Tracks
BL 1500 Durable
BL 1600 Durable
3M Starnark 380fES
Ti¡e Track
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracls
Areas
Arqas
Areas
Areas
Areas
Areas
Tire Tracks
Tire Track
Tire Tracks
Ski¡ Areas
Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es
thru lane
@ate of installation)
Products and
0.318 0.338 s6 0.328 0.346 20 0.325 0.343 10 0.323 0.34t 21 0.325 0.342 15 0.327 0.344 ll 0.323 0341 16
0.318 0.338 57 0.325 0.343 29 0.324 0.342 tt 0.322 0.340 22 0.324 0.34r 0.326 0.343 lt 0.32s 0.342 1615
0 6t 1422 r915 2622 3n6 4023
YX YX YX YX YX Yx YX
2ffi5
19-Ja¡ 19-Jul 31-Oct
2Wl9-Apr 20-Jul 3-Nov 19-Apr
0.320 0.338 72 0.330
0.320 0.339 1r 0.32'7
0.318 0.337
2t 0.329 034637 03n 0343
0343 t2
0342 t2
0;34O
9.3+
0.318 0.337
0.328 0.345 25 0.328
0.325 0.343 37 0.325
0.344
0.341
0.346 10 0.325
0344 9 0.324
0.343 8
0.344 8
0:327 03440.325 0.342
0.324 0:W_ 11
0.322 0.341 19
0.347
0.344
12 0,176
t4 0.325
0.344 32
0.343 27
,0.3390.339
24
25
0.328
03280326
0.344 13 0.328 0.345 19
0.330 0.346 12 0.327 0.344 19
0.342 2t 0.328 0.344 14 0.328 0.344 rl 0.321 0.344 15
0.34r 19 0.323 0.341 13 0.327 0.343 9 0.326 0.343 16
0.323 0.343 15 0.325 0.342 9 0.321
67
6l
0.319
0.319
0.?2t 0.34r ."48 0.!25
0.320 0.3Æ 48 0.323
20 0.324 .0342 " tt 0.3t922 0.325 0.343 12 0.320
0.344 r0 0.325
0.342 8 0.325
0.344 13 0.323
0.343 12 0.324
15
15
t4
0.338
0.339
69 0.328 0.345 t7 0.325
69 0.326 0.344 3t 0.325 0.323 0.342 t4 0.325 0.343 l1 0.325
0.318 0.336 50 0.331
0.317 0.336 53 0.326
.q,?le 0 ?40 sl 0.126
0.319 0.339 5l 0.324
0.320 0340 47 0.327
22 0.324 0.342 9
.9.3y 18 0.325
0.342 26 0.326
0342 r.1 0.323
0.343 12 0.322
03240320
n -^9,??818 q325 o-325
0.339
0.343
l0 0.320 0.339 t411 0.323 0.342 16
0.34t
0.341
ot250.3u
0.3+0.342
0:344
0.343
26
21
t514
0322 0340 20
2t
t4
0343
0.344
0342
0.345
0.342
0.342 15
0.338 2t0.3q5_". 0:34_2
0.3u 0.342
0.327 0.343 8 0.320
0.324 0.340 l0 0.325
Oit.sn o.tn0.323 0.3N
12
l3
20 0.324
3t 0.323
0.342
0.34r9 0.323 0.341
9 0.320 0.340
t720
0.324
0.324
13
11
o,!o0.34r0.320 03Q 46 0.323
0.315 0.335 49 0.331 0.348 \4 0.321 0.340
0.315 0.336 48 0.330 0.341 21 0.322 0.342
11 0.318
12 0.318
0.338 21
0.338 2t0.343- l_1
0.344 t00.32t 0.340
0.321 0.340
0.321 0.340 14 0.325
0.321 0.340 13 únt5l6
28.5Vo
29.3Vo
40.3;7o
38.77o
28.lVo
jt17,33.3Vo
3l.jVa
17.87o
l7.2Va
2l.8Va
27.3Vo
24.2Va
34.6Vo
30.6Vo
32.j%a
27.2Vo
26.4Va
% O.ìgnalYReadingRetained
27
Yellow on Concrete:
Table 19: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC Surface
Areas
a*tqgg-"T'rre Tbacki
Swa¡co Director 35
Swa¡co Director 60
Swa¡co Director 90
.- ., -SkipAreasATM 3000Heavy Duty
Tire Tlacks
Skip Areas
ATM 4000 Supel Duqy ..
Tire Tracks
Ski_p-Apa-9
BL 1500Dumble
Tire Tracks
Sh-p- ArepBL 1600 Durable
Skip Areas
3M Stannrk 380IES
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracks
Tire Track
Tire Tracks
Tire Tracks
Skip Areas
Areas
Areas
Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es
('000) per thru lane
@ate of installation)
Products and
x yYX vYx yYX yYX yY x yY
0.481 0.4s3 36 0.439 0.42s t4 0.39s 0.396 I 0.432 0.426 16 0.412 0.410 tt0.481 0.4s3 36 0.4s3 0.433 19 0.409 0.407 9 0.427 0.424 15 0.412 0.410 r0 0.394 0.393 8 0.413 0.411 11
0.399 0.396 8 0.411 0.410 I I
5 0.418 0.4t4 9 0.394 0.396 6 0.405 0.398 1 0.413 0.M 1
5 0.4t2 0.410 9 0.401 0.401 6 0.390 0.387 6 0.418 0.413 8
0.417
tit2
0.418
r6
9
0.495 0.4& 42 0.459
0.474 0438 3t 0.4124 0.408 t5 0.ry7
0.412 0.431 30 0.412 0.401 11 0.390
0.494 0.46s 41 0.468 0.443
0.493 0.4& 41 0.4Æ 0.429
0.489 0.461 37 0.469 0.443 20 0.39'7
0.490 o.Mr 36 0.450 0.432 13 0.391
0.494 0.4& 41 0.467
0.431 0.423 11
0.396 0.400 10 0.383 0.386 7 0.N1 0.401
0.429 0.422 11
0.ñ2 11 0.417 0.414
0.4t2 14 0.419 0.411
8
8
ll
"9.fçg. 0f500A69 0.450
0.&0.485
0.453
0.452
0:448 35
0.448 35
38
38
0.445
0.463
0.427
0.435
0.435 0.424
0.436 0.424
0.431
0.442
15
21
12 0.388
20 0.ñ2
14 0.4u)
t4 0.430
13
20
0:390
0.399
0.392
0.403
0.394
0.405
0.392 1
0.396 6
0.407 l,q 0.448
0.423 13 0.450
0.391
0.391
8 0.425
t0 0.422
0.419
0.413
0.408
0.414
0.434
0.437
0.431
0.434
0.4q.. u0.441 25
0.411 15
0.4t1 15
0.420
0.4r1
0.452 0.438 t70.441 0.432 15
t'7 0.421
20 0.423
0.419
0.421
0.432 0.421
0.421 0.422
0.417
0.410
l3t4
0.386
0.782
0,.ñ2 0.400 10
0.394 0.395 10
9.4t1"
.0:4o.5
0.405
0.398
0-399 '7 0.423
0.395 7 0.429
0:406
0.N7
9 0.426
9 0.434
0.418 10
0.423 11
0.42t0.426
10
1l
l515
8'
9
0.449
0.430
0.M 0.403 10 0.383 0.385 8 0.401 0.Æ2
0.M 0.ñ2 12 0.383 0.384 8 0.39 0.400
0.397 0.400
0.401 0.400
"0.393 0.395 " 6
0.405 0.M 7
Q,Æ 1l
0.Q7 t2
o.ry 10 0.395 0.394 8
0.413 11 0.398 0.391 8
0.3_84 6
0385 6
0.403 0.405 10 0.387 0.391 8 0.394 0.400 10
0,ff0.4&
0.448..
0.448
32
32
3l30
orn-2
0.455
"9+o
0.435
9.49Þ0.445
04260432
15
18
0.fl10.421
17 0.398
20 0.413
0.391
0.411
0.q20.416
9
11
0.4t40.M
0.M0.403
0.44.1 .!70.424 12
0.420
0.4t3
0 6l 1422 t975 2622 3n6 ñ23
X yY
Date of Reading
2W 2æ5
19-Jan 19-Jul 31-Octl9-Apr 2GJul 3-Nov 19-Apr
30.2Vo
3l.2Va
23.8Vo
25.8Va
37.47a
Z7.3Vo
30.lVa
35.5Vo
32.9Vo
35.OVo
28.4Va
22.97o
2n.4Vo
30.37o
23.3Va
24.3Va
4l.9Va
45.9Va
Vo OrignalYReading
Retained
28
WhitePo on C-oncrete
Table 20: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC Surface
Tlre TFacks
rerag9
S Areas
., -Skip Areas
HPS-5
Starnark 1200
Ti¡e Tncla
IS90
Areas
Areas
Areas
Tire Traclcs
Tire TrackStaûErk 1000
Tire Tracla
thru lane
Vehicle Passes
@ate of installation)
koducts and
0.340 63 0.327 034s 23 0.32s 0.343 11 0.322 0.340 18 0.323 0.341 t20.340 62 0.324 0.344 36 0323 0342 tl 0.321 0.340 17 0.322 0.340 13 0.324 0342 10 0.323 0.341 12
0.325 0342 10 0.323 0.341 11
0.319
0.319
0.320 0.341 63 0.329 0.341 18 0.326 0.344 9 0.322 0.34t 12 0.324 0.v3 10 0.325 0.y2 8 0.322 0.34r
0.320 0.3Æ 63 0.326 0.'.346 32 0.324 0.342 l0 0.321 0.339 t2 0.322 0.339 9 0.324 0.340 8 0.324 0.341
0.322 0.342 59 0.330 0:v9 18 0.326 0.343 9 0.323 0.339 12 0.323 0.Ur 10
0323 0.343 58 0.326 0:346 29 0.325 0.344 9 0.322 0.341 12 0.321 0.340 9
0.31'7 0.339 65 0.323 0.343 28 0.323 0.342 12 0.320 0.340 17 0.322 0.:341 l0 0.322 0.341 9 0.322 0.3,10 l00.3t1 0339 65 0.322 0.342 38 0.321 0.341 10 0.319 0.339 t5 0.321 0.341 ll 0.323 0:341 9 0322 0.342 12
0."?.3!._q{ 9}?1"9,1# _3"0_ 9:3?6_.q:?43 þ 9??t_ 0940". "?q .9,Q3_ 9:341 20 0.32e
0.337 & 0.322 0.v2 44 0.323 0.341 14 0.323 0.340 31
0.347 t5 0.324 0.344 t40.324 0.343 t4
10
10
g.?r1
0.3t7
9.?+. "94J.....1_. "0-1P 013e
0.323 0.341 8 0.323 0.3,10
0.323 o.vt 22 0.328 0.345 t3
0 6t 1422 t975 2O2 3276 4fJ23
YX Yx YX YX YX YX Yx
2GJul 19-Jan 19-Apr 3l-Oct3-Nov
2æ5
l9-Jul
Date of Reading:
l9-Apr
2W
18.6Vo
17.4Vo
18.3Vo
16.ZVo
18.ÙVo
22.5Va
22.5Vo
15.8Vo
15.6Vo
15.37o
VooriglnalYReadingRetained
29
Table 21: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC Surface
Yellow on C¡ncrete:
Cumulativ e Vehicle Pas s es
thru lane
@ate of installation)
ducts and
Tire Tiacks
3M Stann¡k 1000
3M Star¡nrk 1200
lex[S90 *
S-ki-p _A1e19
Ennis HPS-5
.--[Fp Areas
Tire Tmcla
Areas
Tire Track
Tire Tracls
Tire Tracla
X YYX YX YX
0.368
0.367
0.337
0.336
.407 17 0.438 0.422 l8 0.421 0.409 14 0.395 0.388 10 0.404 0.400 11
0.431 0.418 t3 0.441 0.425 t9 0.423 0.412 14 0.391 0.386 9
35 0.449 0.427 20 0.418 0
0.404 0.398 1234 0 458 0 430 26
o+s8- o.a5i sr ö.44s o..as -li -041s
0:,i0i rr 0.44s 0.428 zz o.izt0.496 0.454 50 0.459 0.428 24 0.4n 0.423 16 0.452 0.433 23 0.429 0.418
l3t4
0.467
0.455
0.427
0.413
0.497 0.454 5t 0.435 0.418 t3 0.429 0.415
35 0.4t3 0.407 9 0.423 0.416
27 0.412 0.M t0 0.420 0.413
0.443 0.423 t9 0.427 0.411
0.438 0.419 11 0.424 0.408
16 0.378 0.378 10 0.417 0.410 14
0.403 0.393 l0 0.418 0.410
0.405 0.395 11 0.417 0.411
0.391 10 0.397 0.390 9
0.388 9 0.398 0.390 10
0.458 0.426 A0.4û 0.428 26
0.4i1".. 0:f94
0.408 0.M_ 0.3% 0.388 9 0.387
0.382 0.382 1 0.392
38
5t
0.439
0.445
0.418
0.480.401 10
0.4t2 12
13
t6
13
15
0._4a 0.429 2t 0.426 0At30.445 0.430 21 0.425 0.416
11
11
15
t6
0.4u0.399
0.387
0.389
l5t6
0.494 0.451 50 0.444 0.420 t8 0.444
0 417
0 47'7.0.qe0.4Æ
t9'750 6t 1422 2O2 32'76 uJ23
x YYX YX
of Reading:
2GJul 19-Jan 19-Apr 19-Jul 3l-Oct
2W19-Apr 3-Nov
2æ5VaOrignaIYReadingRetained
_47.67o27.7%
"7þ,5Eq27.37o
24,97.9
26.57a
37.2Vo
29.LVo
25.\Va
27.77a
30
DURABILITY READINGS
Durability readings are taken by two evaluators. Each evaluator makes a subjective readìng of
each marking based upon the percentage of the marking remaining in place. These percettages
are then averaged for eaeh product at Bach testlocation. Thus, the durability of a product at the
time of installation is 100. Tables 22 throttgh 29 present the durability readings for each product
and test location. All but one longitudinal products had durabilitl' values of at least 95Vo. The
lone procluct with durability in the uppor 80's and lorver 90's was the po-lyurea product Epoplex.
The RTC's QPL standards require that durability rernain at or above 98Vo fw white longitudinal
products used on heavy volume roadways, and 957a for yellow longitudinal products on heavy
volume roadways.
31
9898r9898981001003lvI Stam¡irk380lES
91979696ç81CIOBt 1600Durable 95
100BI- 1500 Durable 9v9V96)59799
9898989999100100ATM 4000SuperDury
9899991001oCI,ATM 3000Heavy Du,ty 9898
rCI0Swarcs Difecto,r90 9899979B99,100
100Swarco Dircctor 60 989897)9I99,100
9898979999100r00Swarco Director 3:5
0Curnu lativ e Vehicle Fas s es
l'000) oerthru lane44233n6262219751422661
31.Oet19-Jul19-Apr3-No-v20-J¡l1-9-,4.¡,r
20CI520CI4(Date o.f in s tallation)Prod¡cts andWhite Tape on AG
Table 22:Dwabtlity Readings lor Longitudinal Wfiito Tape Products on AC Surface
32
100il003M Stamark3S0IES 9898989899
9897969596981CIOBL 1600Þurable
9696100BL 1500Durable 9rr979594
.ATM 4000 SupêrDuti 98989899991001,00
qgw9899100100ATM 3000 Heavy Drrty 98
91991CIoS¡'¡r-atco Direcm¡90 98989,697
100100Swareo Direetor60 989-89799100
Swarco Þiroctor 35 9899979899100100
1&26610Cunmlative Vchicle Pas ses
fi000) oerthru lane4AZ332,V6263,21975
3-Nov2û-Jul19-Apr 31-Oct19-Ju,ll9-Apr19.Jan
20052004(Dat¿, o f i¡stallation)ProducB andYellsw Taue on Ae¡
TabLc 23: Durøbility Readings l.or Lo.ngitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC Surfaee
33
94919"19,19810û100Ennis 1JPS=5
9199100100Enoolexl-S90 889292
I00lM Sta¡oârl 1200 979797E9100100
9898991001003M Stamarle 1000 9898
4Ðn32:t62622l97st42266t0Cumulative Vehicte Pas sles
f000)'perthru lane
3-Nov20-Jul19-Apr 31;Oetl9Jull9-AÞrlg-Jan
aCI052004(Þate of installadon)DateFroduets aud
\Vhite ?olruroa on *{C;
Table ?4:Dvrablli:ty Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface
Table 25: Durab-ility Roaùngs for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface
* on ¿198,000euin'ulative at tillÈ of last was
w9899x001.00Ennis IIFS-S 9798
939799100Ep B1exl,S90 * 9196
3M Starnark 1200 98989799100100100
1001003M Stamark 1000 989898s9,E9
14226610Curnulative Veh icle Pas s es
l'000) rer thru laneÆ21324162922tgvs
2&Jul19.ABr 3i-Oot19-Jr¡l19-Apr,3.Nov(Date of installationl 2CI04
Produets andTellow?'oþurea on A,C;
3,4
98989898981001oCI3M Stamerk3SOIES
989898989899100BI- 1600 Du¡able
9897979797,98100BL 1500Durable
9898999999t00100ATIvI- 4000 Super Duty
98989999100100100ATM 3000}treavy hity
9898999999100100Swareo Directot90
989899991001001û0Sw¿rco Dfuector 60
98999999100roCI100Swarco Direetor35
402332162622197514226610Curmrlative Vehicle Passes('000) Ber thru lane
3l-Oct19-J¡l19.ABr19-Jan3-Nov20-JuI19-Apr
2044(Date of in¡tallation) 2DA5
Froduots and lâf¡i ^'
White Tape on C-oncrete:
Table 26: Durability Readingo for Longitudinal White Tape Product oR PCC Surface
Table 27: Durability Readings forLor.lgitudinal Yellow Tapo Prodtrets CIn PCC Surface
98989898981001003M Stanrark3S0IES
9898e8e899100BL1600Durable 98
979,695959595100B,L1500Durable
9898q9c99g1CI0100ATM 400CI SuperDutv
9898999999100100AïM 3000Heavy Duty
98989899100100100Swafco Directo.r 90
)8,98999899100100Swarco Director 60
9899999999100100Swareo Director 35
4A23!2762622L9',:1514226610Crrmu lative rlehicle Fas c e,s
(000)per'hru lanc
3l-Oet19-Jul19-A.or19-Jan3-lilov2&Jul19-Aor
2005zAM(D-ate of in s t"a'llatioû)
Products andYellow TaÞ€ ot Concrète:
35
9997991001CIOEnnis IIPS-S 9&98
98lq898989910010ûEooplexIS90
949€9898981001003M StàrÍrafk 1200
96979898971001003M Stamark 10O0
4æ33n626227W514226610Gur¡¡r¡lative Vehisle Pas s es
f000) nerthm lane
3l-ÕctI9-Jul19-Aor19.Jan3-Nov20-Jul19-Atrz0a4(D¿te of installctio'n)
Froducts and
White Pol¡rure,â on Conc¡ete:
Table 28: Durability Readings.for Longitudinal Whjte PolyureaProducts on PCC Suüaee
Tab1e29: Durab-ility'Readings for Longirudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on?CC Surface
2,198,CI006. eurimlfitive at finæ oflast iÌæasurenbiit lüas*
9798989B98100100F'.nnis [IPS-5
Epoplex-I^S-90 * 9898989999100
3M Staraârk 1200 95n9897w99100
961001003M Stamark 1000 969798
66t0Cutnulative Vehiele Fas s es
ll00$ oerthnr lano442312ir,62&2t9751422
19-Anr19-Jan2CI-Jul1.9-Aor 31-Oct19=Jul3-Nov{Date of ins [allatisu.) 2005zAM
Date ofReading:Produets and
lhllow F'olvu¡êå on Concrete:
36
P RELIM IN ARY EVALU AT I O N S
Retroreflectivity
The white longitudinal products that have performed relatively well so far, with avenage tire/skip
retroreflectivity readings of over 180 on both the AC as well as the PCC surfaces, include 3M
Stamark 380IES, ATM 3000, Ennis IIPS-5, Epoplex LS90, Swarco Director 60 and Swarco
Director 90. On the other hand, performing poorly with values under 100 are Briteline 1500
Durable and Briteline 1600 Durable.
For yellow products, the following products performed well with average retoreflectivity
readings of at least 180, namely, 3M Stamark 380IES, Ennis F{PS-5, Epoplex LS90, ATM 4000
(on PCC), and Swarco Director 35 (on AC). Poorly performing products on both surfaces include
Briteline 1600 Durable, 3M Stamark 1000, and 3M Stamark 1200
Chromacity
For white longitudinal products, all color coordinate readings are within both the ASTM and
FHWA acceptance boxes (Figures 6 and 10). However, none of the white longitudinal products
are above the "Y" minimum value for the ASTM or FFfWA standards (Figures 7 and l1).
For the yellow products, almost all products had the x and y color-coordinates outside of both the
FIIWA and ASTM acceptance boundaries or box (Figures 8 and 12) on both the PCC and AC
surfaces. Also, the chromacity "Y" readings are generally below both the FFIWA and ASTM
minimum thresholds except for a couple on products (Figures 9 and 13).
Table 30 presents the pass/fail status of all longitudinal products placed on the Desert Inn test
deck. Readings for products marked "Skip only" indicate that the skip areas (the portion of the
marking not passing under the tire track of the lane) fall within the acceptable limit, but the
portion of the marking under the tire track does not. Some products are also marked "Tire only",
indicating that the tire tracks were acceptable, whereas the skip areas were not.
JI
Table 30: ASTM and FIfWA Chromacity Pass or Fail for Longitudinal Products
Durabilit)¡
Almost all the longitudinal products had durability values essentially the same relative to the
previous readings, at close to 95Vo and above (Tables 22-29) with no significant wearing,
slippage, and/or tearing. Only Epoplex LS90 had lower durability values of about 887o and 9l7o
on the AC and PCC surfaces, respectively.
FailFailFail
Pas s
FailFailFailFail
Pas s
Pas s
FailFail
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pas s
FailPas s
Pas s
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pas s
FailFail
Pas s
FailFailFailFaiiFaiìFail
Pas s
Fail
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
YellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellow
Director 35
Director 60
Director 90
3000 HD4000 sD
1500 Durable1600 Durabte
Stamark 380IES
Stamark 1000
Stamark 1200
LS90HPS-5
SwarcoSwarcoSwarcoATMATM
Brite-LineBrite-Line
3M3M3M
EpoplexEnnis
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Fail
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
FailFailFail
Swarco
S warcoSwarcoATMATM
Brite-LineBrite-Line
3M3M3M
EpoplexEnnis
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
Pass
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
Pas s
WhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhite
Director 35
Director 60
Director 90
3000 HD4000 sD
1500 Durable1600 Durable
Stama¡k 380IES
Stamark 1000
Stamark 1200
LS90HPS-5
Lum ("Y")Color (x,y)Lum. ("Y")Color (x,y)Lum. ("Y")Color (xy)Lum ("Y")Color (x,v)FHWAASTMFH\ry A ASTM
ColorProductVendor PCC SurfaceAC Surface
38
VI. Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Raised Pavement Markers
This section repofts the field measurements for retroreflectivity after installation of the raised
pavement marker (RPM) products.
RETRO RE F LE CTIV ITY READ I N G S
Table 3l below presents a summary of the letroreflectivity readings for the different
measurement periods since installation in June 2004 ap to July 2005. Although all products have
dramatically reduced retroreflectivity values, the Apex 9214R appears to be outperforming the
other two products for both the white/red and yellow/yellow products.
Table 31: Retroreflectivity Readings for RPMs
284
53
12.o
46
871
139
32.4
48
Average Retro. readingMinimum reading
Maximum readingStandard deviationNumber of samples
.Iul-05 11
I31
12.5
20
221
35
lt.224
s8I
126
38623
3021
48'76
22
2l16
30
3.5
zo
3413
60
12.1
24
11044
294
51.5
44
Apr-05 2513
41
6;7
21
2617
34
5.0
25
2410
43
9.5
26
10944
183
28.6
42
311
67
13.8
50
11651
176
36.8
28
Average Retro. readingMinimum readingMaximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples
t2I
35
1 1.6
18
25I
50
t2.226
602
131
3 8.6
24
Fel>05 7346
105
161
28
74762
268
42.t48
4l4
12
t1.448
177.1
253
s4.4
48
Äverage Retro. readingMinimum readingMaximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples
31
7
105
¿t I22
,<2
42
10.1
22
8215
186
53.2
24
5330
13
11.9
23
3519
47
7.O
28
453
'77
t8.247
219131
331
43.t48
Average Retro, readingMinimum readingMaxìmum readingStandard deviationNumber of samples
Oct-O4 t62
45
12.8
2'7
30l'l55
tl.722
11320
198
60.6
24
l59
26
5.6
18
3628
46
5.2
24
5320
103
19824
11345
20640.9
36
Jun-04 321200460
587a/
165t43183
10.8
24
240191
281
23.3
zo
318241
398
29.4
46
5338
65
6.1
50
3221'7 5
411
55.5
46
Average Retro. readingMinimum reading
Maximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples
t4t104
t6916622
138108
180
18 I
22
239194
267
20.2
LO
RedWhiteYellowRedWhiteYellowRedW hite YellowDes crip tion YeVYelwhite/RedYeVYel'whire/RedYeVYelWhite/RedProduct Vita-LiteGlobemarker92I ARVendor Swa¡eflexA pex
Retrorefl ec tiv ity readin g s Durango Drive
39
DURABILITY READINGS
For durability, every installed RPM was inspected and evaluated on its presence, physical
condition and placement. Missing markers with and without glue backings, broken markets,
markers that slid out of place, and markers with broken glass were recorded. The number of
markers remaining in good condition were then summed and compared to the original amount of
markers placed. Table 32 shows the durability evaluation results through the most recent
observation period, July 2005. It appears that with over 93Vo of the markers still in good
condition, all products are performing well except the yellow/yellow Swareflex Vita-Lite, which
appear to be losing their the reflective glass surfaces entirely. The Apex 921 AR has a few
markers having broken glass surfaces.
Table 32:Dwabllity readings for RPMs
43I0
0
0
6
461
0
0
0J
490
0
0
In
500
0
0
0
0
930
0
6tt
1
970
0
3
0
0
Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place
Markers slide out of place
Onlv slas s broken/mis sins
July-05
980
0
2
0
0
Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place
Markers slide out of place
Only glass broken/missing
April-05 431
0
0
0
6
461
0
0
0
J
500
0
0
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
940
0
5
0
I
Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place
Markers slide out of place
Only glass broken/mis s in g
February-05 441
0
0
0
5
47I0
1
0
1
50t¡
0
0
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
940
0
5
0
1
980
0
2
U
0
500
0
0
0
0
1 000
0
0
0
0
1 00t,
0
0
0
0
Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place
Markers slide out of place
Only glas s broken/mis sing
November-04 490
0
0
0
I
480
0
0
0
2
50
0
0
0
0
0
-5050100100Ouantitv ins talled 5050
W hire/RedReflectiveYeVYel
White/RedReflectiveYeVYel
whire/RedReflectiveDescription YeVYel
Glo b emarker9214RProduct Vita-LiteSwareflexApeXVendor
40
YIL Tentative Dates for Fului'e Data Collection
The following are tentative field data collection schedules for the remaining pavement marking
evaluation project. It is anticipated that the respective local transportation agencies with
jurisdiction over the test locations will provide traffic cont¡ol for the field work. Upcoming field
data collection dates:
üreek of January 16,2006
Week of April 16,2006
These dates a.re subject to change, depending on availability of roadways, weather, and other
unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances.
4L