46
Quarterly Report Prepared f,or Regional Transportation Commis sisn (RTC) of Southern Nevada 500 S. Grand Central Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 Evaluation of Performance of Pavement Markings for Clark County Roads January 10,209{ Ø Mohamed Kaseko Associate hofessor of Civil Engineering Vinod Vasudevan Transportation Systems Analyst Siddhaflh David Research Assistant Transportation Research Center Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas 4505 Maryland Pmkway, Box 45400f Las Vegas, NV 59L54-4007

of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Quarterly Report

Prepared f,or

Regional Transportation Commis sisn (RTC)of Southern Nevada

500 S. Grand Central ParkwayLas Vegas, Nevada 89106

Evaluation of Performance of PavementMarkings for Clark County Roads

January 10,209{ Ø

Mohamed KasekoAssociate hofessor of Civil Engineering

Vinod VasudevanTransportation Systems Analyst

Siddhaflh DavidResearch Assistant

Transportation Research CenterHoward R. Hughes College of Engineering

University of Nevada, Las Vegas4505 Maryland Pmkway, Box 45400f

Las Vegas, NV 59L54-4007

Page 2: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Executive Summarv

The primary objective of this project is to perform field evaluations of pavement marking

products and identify those products that meet the performance criteria as specified and include

them in the qualified product list (QPL) maintained by the Regional Transportation Commission

(RTC) of Southern Nevada. Three types of products are evaluated based on their intended usage:

intersection markings, longitudinal markings, and raised pavement markers (RPMs). This report

presents details of the test deck results through the sixth set of field measurements for

retroreflectivity, color, and durability taken in October 2005 on the longitudinal products. The

fourth set of field measurements for RPM products that were also to be taken in October 2005

were not done due to faulty equipment. The equipment, ART-1200, had to be shipped back to the

vendor for repairs. It is expected that the equipment will be available for the January 2006

measurements. Products for longitudinal markings were installed on a section of the eastbound

Desert Inn Super-arterial. RPM test deck products were placed on Durango Drive between

Sahara Avenue and Desert Inn Road.

In general, each installed product is intended to provide a marking that will not distott

due to temperature if the surface of the pavement remains stable. The longitudinal products are

evaluated based on retroreflectivity, durability, and color (chromacity). Measurements of these

parameters on each product at each location are taken once every three months for two years.

Similarly, field measurements for retroreflectivity and durability for RPMs are taken at intervals

of three months for two years.

As reported previously, retroreflectivity and chromacity readings have dropped

significantly for all longitudinal products since installation. Some of these products have fallen

below RTC's current QPL specifications. Durability measurements for the longitudinal products

are almost all close to 95 percent or higher. Regarding RPM durability, some markers have lost

the reflective glass surfaces entirely. Also, a small amount of markers have broken glass surfaces

or broken as of the July 2005 measurement.

11

Page 3: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table of Contents

Executive Summary.....List of Figures.....List of Tables

I.

il.

Introduction

Test Sites and Test Deck Design..Intersection MarkingsLongitudinal Markings....................Raised Pavement Markers (RPMs).

Products Installed on the Test Deck

Measurements of Field PerformancePavement Markin g Materi als

Retrorefl ective RPM Products

Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Pavement Marking Materials,Retroreflectivity Readings ..........Color Readings...Durability ReadingsPreliminary Evaluations..............

Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Raised Pavement Markers....Retroreflectivity Readings ...........

Durability Readings

VII. Tentative Dates for Future Data Collection

1

1

1aJaJ

4

7

10

ilr.

rv.

1

V

vI.

11

11

18

3l3'.7

393940

4l

lt1

Page 4: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

List of Fisures

Figure 1:

Figure2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

Figure 9:

Figure 10:

Figure 11:

Figure 12:

Figure 13:

Placement of Test Markings at a Typical Intersection.............. ...................2

Placement of Polyurea Pavement Markings at an Intersection........ ............6

Placement of Tape Pavement Markings at an Intersection ........6

Measuring Chromacity and Retroreflectivity of Markings at Intersections ............,.....9

Measuring Retroreflectivity of Test Markings on the Desert Inn Test Deck ................9

Chromacity "N - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits ..........19

Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FFIWA Acceptance Limits ........1,9

Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........20

Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on ACSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits .............20

Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC Surface

Plotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........2I

Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCCSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits .............2I

Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits ..........22

Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCCSurface Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits .............22

IV

Page 5: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

List of Tables

Table 1: Intersection Test Sites

Table 2: Intersection Marking Products

Table 3: Longitudinal Marking Products....

Table 4: RPM products...........

Acceptable Color Coordinate Regions and Luminance Factors ..............

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC ............

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on 4C...........

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyrrea Products on AC

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC .........

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC .........

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyrrea Products on PCC

Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC

Table 5:

Table 6:

Table 7:

Table 8:

Table 9:

Table 10:

Table 11:

Table 12:

Table 13:

Table 14:

Table 15:

Table 16:

Table 17:

Table 18:

Table 19:

Table2O:

Table2l:Table22:

Table23:

Table24:

Table25:

'table26:-lable 27:

Table 28:

Table29:

Table 30:

Table 31:

2

..5

..5

..8

12

13

t4L4

15

T6

n17

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on 4C.......

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on 4C.....

Color Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC.

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC.....

Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC...

Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC

Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC

Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC

Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on 4C.......

Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC

Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC

Durability Readings for Longitudinal White Polytrea Products on PCC.......

Durability Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC.....

ASTM and FIfWA Chromacity Pass or Fail for Longitudinal Products

Retroreflectivity Readings for RPMs

..............23

..............24

..............25

..............26

'...,.'.'',,..21

..............28

..............29

..............30

..............32

..............33

..............34

..............34

..............35

..............35

..............36

..............36

..............38

..'..',,,.'.'.39

..............40Table 32:Durability readings for RPMs

Page 6: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

I. Introduction

The primary objective of this project is to perform field evaluations of pavement marking

products and identify those products that meet the performance criteria as specified and include

them in the qualified product list (QPL) maintained by the Regional Transportation Commission

(RTC) of Southern Nevada. This list is used by the various local transportation and public works

agencies. Three types of products will be evaluated based on their intended usage, i.e., products

for intersection markings, products for longitudinal markings, and raised pavement markers

(RPMs).

This reporl presents details of the results of the initial through the sixth set of field

measurements for the pavement marking products for retroreflectivity, color and durability. The

sixth set of measurements was taken in October 2005, approximately fifteen months after

installation of the products. However, the equipment for retroreflectivity measurements of

RPMs, the ART 1200, was broken down at the time of taking measurements and had to be

shipped back to the vendor for repairs. It is anticipated to be back in time for the January

readings. As such, the latest readings available and presented in this report for the RPMs are the

July 2005 readings.

il. Test Sites and Test Deck Design

INTERSECTION MARKINGS

Products for intersection markings \¡/ere installed at selected intersections in the Las Vegas

Valley. The intersections are shown in Table I on the next page with their estimated approach

average daily traffic (ADT) for each direction. All intersections have asphalt concrete (AC)

surfaces. Four different products were installed on each intersection as stop bars and pedestrian

crossing lines, with each product installed on three different approaches of the intersection, as

shown in Figure l.

I

Page 7: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

39,500/27,200Eastern Ave./Green Valley PkwyJ Henderson

2 Clark County35,500132,300Eastern Ave./lVarm Springs Rd.

Eastern Ave./Windmill Ln1 Clark County32,150/2r,300

JurisdictionLink ADTs

(North -S outhÆast-Westapproach)

Intersection

Table 1: Intersection Test Sites

PRDOUCT 1 PRODUCT2 PROD UCT 3

t777777774PRODUCT4

Figure 1: Placement of Test Markings at a Typical Intersection

2

I

¿lJ

+I

777,

EEE

z=

I

hgffi

II

Page 8: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

LONGITUDINAL MARKINGS

Products for longitudinal markings Ìvere installed on a section of the eastbound Desert Inn (DI)

Super-arterial, between Valley View Boulevard and Paradise Road. This section of the road had

an estimated ADT of 43,100 combined both directions in year 2003 (source: Nevada Department

of Transportation (NDOT) Annual Traffic Report 2003). This test deck consists of two sections,

one on an asphalt concrete (AC) surface, and the other on a Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)

surface. Each product is installed on both surface types across the shoulder lane in 4-inch wide

transvorse stripes (Figure 5). Each product has four lines installed on each pavement surface.

RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS (RPMS)

RPM test deck products were placed on Durango Drive between Sahara Avenue and Desert Inn

Road, in the City of Las Vegas. This portion of Durango Drive consists of an asphalt concrete

surface with 6 through lanes (3 in each direction), and a two-way left turn lane (TWLTL). The

average annual daily traffic for this location was about 31,500 combined both directions (source:

Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) Annual Traffic Report 2003), Two types of

markers were placed on the test deck:

o White/red on the lane lines

o Yellow/yellow on the T'WLTL lanes

'White/red reflective RPMs were placed along skip lines at an interval of 40 feet between

markers. Yellow reflective RPMs were placed along the TWLTL lines at an interval of 40 feet

between markers. One hundred markers were placed per product. All RPMs on the test deck are

abrasion resistant.

J

Page 9: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

ilI. Products Installed on the Test Deck

All pavement marking products were installed on the respective test decks during the week of

April 19, 2004. RPM installation was completed on June 10, 2004. Vendors were responsible for

installation of their products. Some vendors performed their own installations, while other

vendors hired contractors to install their products. Traffic control was provided by Advance

Traffic Safety (ATS) and the cost was split among the participating vendors in proportion to the

number of products installed. The vendors were billed directly by ATS. All installations were

done at night to minimize impact on traffic. For products installed at intersections, the l2-inch

wide markings were installed side by side with the existing markings. Tables 2 and 3 summarize

the products installed at the intersection sites as well as at the Desert Inn Super-arterial. Table 4

lists the products installed on the RPM test deck.

Table 2: Intersection Marking Products

TapeTape

1500 Durable,1600 Durable

Brite-Line Eastern / Green ValleyEastern / Green Valley

ATM Eastern / Green ValleyEastern / Green Valley

TapeTape

3000 Heavy Duty4000 Super Duty

PolyureaFIPS-5Ennis Eastern / Windmill

Swarco Eastern / WindmillEastern / Windmill

TapeTape

Director 60Director 90

Stamark 320lESStamark 420Stamark 1000

3M Eastem / Warm SpringsEastem / Warm SpringsEastern / Windmill

TapeTapePolyurea

LS90Epoplex Eastern /'Warm SpnngsPolwreaZttmar Eastern / Warm SpringsPref. ThermoplasticHotTape 90

MaterialProductVendor Intersection

4

Page 10: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

YellowPolyureaHPS-5EnnisHPS-5Ennis WhitePolwrea

Epoplex YellowPolyureaLS90PolyureaLS90Epoplex White

3M YellowPolyureaStamark 1200

PolyureaStamark 12003M WhiteStamark 10003M YellowPolwrea

WhitePolyureaStamark 10003MStamark 380IES3M YellowTape

3M WhiteTapeStamark 380IESTape1600 DurableBrite-Line Yellow

Brite-Line WhiteTape1600 DurableBrite-Line YellowTape1500 Durable

Tape1500 DurableBrite-Line WhiteATM YellowTape4000 Super DutyATM WhiteTape4000 Super Duty

Tape3000 Heavy DutyATM YellowATM WhiteTape3000 Heavy Duty

YellowTapeDirector 90Swarco

Director 90Swarco WhiteTapeSwarco YellowTapeDirector 60

TapeDirector 60Swarco WhiteSwarco YellowTapeDirector 35

Director 35Swarco WhiteTape

ProductVendor ColorMaterial

Table 3: Longitudinal Marking Products

Table 4: RPM products

5

Vita-LiteSwareflex Yellow/YellowSwareflex whire/RedVita-LiteSwareflex YelloWYellowGlobemarker

WhirelRedGlobemarkerSwareflex921 ARApex Yellow/Yellow921 ARApex \Mhire/Red

Vendor Reflective ColorProduct

Page 11: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Figure 2: Placement of Polyurea Pavement Markings at an Intersection

Figure 3: Placement of Tape Pavement Markings at an Intersection

6

Page 12: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

IV. Measurements of Field Performance

P AVEMENT MARKIN G MATERIALS

In general, each installed product is supposed to provide a marking that will not flow or distort

due to temperature if the surface of the pavement remains stable. The material shall show no

fading, lifting or shrinkage, significant tearing and other signs of poor adhesion which will

significantly impair the intended use of the marking.

During the project, the installed products are evaluated based on retroreflectivity,

durability, and color. Measurements of these parameters on each product at each location are

taken once every three months for one year for intersection markings, and for two years for

longitudinal markings at the DI Super-arterial. For retroreflectivity and color, measurements are

taken on each pavement marking on two locations per lane, one location on the wheel path (tire

track) and the other on the skip line. For example, an intersection marking that runs across five

lanes of traffic will have measurements taken at ten different locations. Longitudinal markings at

the DI Super-arterial shall have two measurement locations per marking stripe. An average of

three readings is recorded for each measurement location. The performances of the products are

reported against the cumulative number of vehicle passes computed based on 2003 ADT values.

Retrorefl ecti vity measurements

Retroreflectivity measurements are taken using the LTL-2000. This instrument simulates the

light emitted from vehicle headlights 30 meters from the observation point, and measures the

amount of light that would be reflected back to the driver. The value measured is called the

coefficient of retroreflective luminance (Rl), and is measured in SI units (mcd/m'llx¡.

Chromacitv measurements

Color measurements were taken using the BYK Gardner Color Guide. ASTM D 6628-03 and

FIIWA 23 CFR Part 655 standards were used as criteria to evaluate color properties of the

materials. Both standards use the CIE 1931 Color System. Color coordinates ("x" and "y")

represent hue on a two-dimensional coordinate system, and a luminance factor ("Y") records the

lightness. Both standards give four coordinates (x¡ through x+, yt through y+) that identify an

1

Page 13: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

acceptable region, or "box", where the measured color coordinates of the products would be

considered acceptable (see Figure 6, for example). Luminance readings for pavement markings

are also required to meet minimum limits, Yn¡n (see Figure J , for example). The FTIWA standard

also specifies maximum limits, Y-u*, for certain types of markings. Table 5 shows the acceptable

color coordinate region and luminance factor limits for each standard. Both standards require that

color coordinates and luminance for a marking satisfy these limits throughout the servìce life of

the marking.

Table 5: Acceptable Color Coordinate Regions and Luminance Factors for Each Standard

150.4120.4380.5200.4190.4420.551o.4I20.498FIIWA Yellow 45

400.3290.2740.3930.3400.3660.3680.3000.303FHWA White

250.4000.4600.4400.4200.5100.490o.4400.560ASTM Yellow

350.3150.335o.3250.2850.3050.3050.3550.355ASTM'White

X1Standard/Color Yrnu*Y-i.Y+X4YtX3YzXZYt

To satisfy the color requirements for a given standard, the "x" and "y" readings for a product

must fall within the acceptance "box" while the corresponding "Y" reading has to be within the

required minimum and maximum values of the respective standards. Both the ASTM and FFIWA

standards specify a minimum acceptable value for "Y", while the FIIWA also specifies a

maximum limit. For both the "x", "y" and "Y" criteria, the FHWA requirements are generally

more restrictive than ths ASTM requirements.

Durability measurements

Durability is a measure of how much of the marking material remains on the pavement surface in

satisfactory working condition at the time of data collection. Durability measurements are

subjective, and shall be based on ASTM D 913 and are reported in percentage. Two evaluators

estimate the durability of each line and the ayerage of these two readings constitute the durability

measurement for the marking.

8

Page 14: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

I

gIrË

,-,JL

ölë*¡ l, "

ii 4¡i .

rÍf rr

a

..1 - :

Figure 4: Measuring Chromacity and Retroreflectivity of Markings at Intersections

Figure 5: Measuring Retroreflectivity of Test Markings on the Desert Inn Test Deck

9

Page 15: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

RETROREFLECTNE RP M PROD U CTS

Field measurements for retroreflectivity and durability are taken for each product at

approximately three-month intervals. For each product, measurements are taken on one of every

four markers, for a sampling raþ of 25Vo.

Retr-orefl ecti vity measurç¡qe.nts

Refforeflectivity measuremerits were taken using the ART-1200 instrument. Measurements are

taken using the 0.2 degree observation angle geometry, simulating the view of a driver of the

observation point. The standæd SI unit of measure for reüoreflectivity (RI) is mcd/lx.

Durability measurements

Durability is measured as a proportion of markers remaining in place and in good physical

condition. Forlost markers, a distilction is made between those lost due to failure of the bonding

between the adhesive and the markers, or between the adhesive and the pavement surface.

10

Page 16: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

V. Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Pavement Marking Materials

This section reports and summarizes observations for the field measurements for

retroreflectivity, chromacity, and durability taken approximately fifteen months after installation

of the longitudinal products. Field measurements for intersection products were completed in

April 2005 and the final values, evaluations and recommendations for these products have

already been presented to the RTC. These products are not discussed in this report.

RETRO REF LE CTIV ITY READ IN G S

Tables 6 through 13 present the retroreflectivity readings for each longitudinal product and type

of surface. The results show a wide range of performance, from retroreflectivity values in the

low 30's to the high of 400. Once again, some readings are higher than the readings for the

previous period due to the fact that these latest readings were taken about a week after a

rainstorm. Overall, as expected, white products performed better than yellow products. Between

the AC and PCC surfaces, the overall performance was relative similar. Howevet, polyrrea

products generally performed better on the PCC surface than on the AC surface. A more detailed

analysis by products is included in the Preliminary Evaluations section later in this report.

11

Page 17: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

232?2529738029:82544t7SkioAr.eæ 58'/-9o

4AJ%156139140231217238442Ttre Thâeks

63349r379%LShp Ateas L78.Wo&9NI451

1A19Vo3ffiæ9318y7Nïñt319TirelÏack

w1',73tïtwSkipAfeås 56.3%tÐ113186

2I.l4o,493249lm741ß'mTïe Tracks

BLldnDi¡rihle2ffiSkip A¡eæ 42.5.yb,106q+?ffiw190154

251TfueT¡aela. %.Wo5859631ß96t25BL1500D¡uable

t:t.wat6_rq_2@¿tJ23:lw437,Skip Areas

4:nllfe lrac(s 16.39r.nil6761æln188

AlIlvI 4fifi Suo€rDutvS.Hp Areas 619{aw316w,497416381w,

35.47o2Í7212188zr32U3105MTheTrael$ATIú3000ïIeawD¡¡tr¡

2984e)w306wSlip Areas SZT A2UnßTire.Tlãcls 44,V/o2t518917429¿n8?&479

S,r,larco l)¡ector90

2322134?AN'7n4595StiD,Aæqs M.Wo2lJ3

578tÍe lräcKs ?ß.7%16144130xtl2A!9?Æ

Sçarco Diie-etor @

ffi.6iønlx80ruw215193301SiPArsas

49.AVo149wtn190%1n9N2TireTlacksSuarcoDirætor35

4Ww][email protected] \rehicle P'æses

(ffiO)nerthmiane

31-0etn-Jvl1ÈAor19-JanSNovil"Jul19AprfDate sf installation), zffi?Mhduetsand %Qiginal

RoadtnC

Reta¡ned

V/hiteTape tAC

Table 6: Retroteflectivity Results ror Longitudinal Whife Tape ProductÊ on AC Surface

12

Page 18: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

?36Skip-Areæ 86.6%190t5119826s2''L181,

179,toTlre Tþacks 6O17Vo732I22123184176A¡eraÈe

Skio Arear 216'247YTx61907M 139'AEo287

2,3,I2ß193ïreTraclß 121.440235l9tM318

3il4SÞmik380IESSlçinArcas 59u013510377ln 85.Mo105

llre lËtcKs 423555w4969119 35.5Vo

BI-16mDûabletntytSkip Aæas W,.WÒ1042Al

1U2

158

î43t25119

183The Tracks 48'Wo58

BL1500Durâble7n 88

161

?AD293Skip Aæas '76.4%n3nm?Æn82AI

18fig17+tn309TireTrack 4.r,SVo12ßt8ATII4 4000Supe.rDuty

ztl198SkiÞ Arcas lW,1qo2tB1882t729Aztfr1932BrT3TftBTirac1a 71.5Vøta16/129187

Aïlvf 3000lle.avy DufY

4ffiSþ Areas t4Ð\Wffi2t92n 369%150

1mrgz174T4llna Tracts 26,44aÐ11594

Swarco Directorg0

163WskiÞ ertns 83.1%t1861431792522ß188r71'n6TrreTmcls 7I"Zqa1æ137:1432i0

Swarco Direstor,60

Slnþ Ateas 1952W'w380ß62v2t3 ffi2%w'2562A3TræTrack 7A.Maflat471Ðls3

Srwarco Director35

6610Cl¡m¡IativeVehiclePasse¡

f000)perthn¡ hno'4#B32Et2ß22,rq15!4n

2GJull Aor 3l-ûctn:hl19-Aor19J¿¡n3.Nov

2M[Daþ of instdlstion) 2005

hducts md % Original

Bsading

RÊtahed

YellowTaBc on A(}

Table 7: Retrmefleetivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products Õn AC Surfaee

13

Page 19: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 8: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface

White on AC:

Table 9: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface

Yellow on AC: :

Arærage

Tlre TlacksAreas

42.8Vo

51^.3Vo

254227

262

388

192228

4s8

457

t34216

274

340

161

300

3M Starrark 1000

3M Stanark 1200

Ennis HPS-5

þoplexIS90

Tire TrackSkip Areas

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire Tmcla

Skp Areas

Tire Tmcks

Shp Areas

10.8Vo

80.Wo

47.47o

56.47o

21.3Vo

29.6Vo

25.77o

39.3Vo

IO162

226

238

3û287

28zn

142

250

205

390

Jt I

515

7ZJ

397

80

123

158

t6

n5329

255

295

519

562

580

5U

3Q368

94

186

2A358

t79

2r1308

lX

89

171

233

494

205

274

149

2t6

218

2n

42t519

118

'254

3t3313

62

119

Grmrlative Vehicle Pas s es

('000) per thru lanetn51422610 ñ2332572622

hoducts and

(Date of installation)

%ùJ'gnalReading

Retained

Date of Reading:

2W19-Apr 2GJul

2æ5

l9-Jan ; l9-Apr 3l-Oct3-Nov D-Jú

Arærage

Tlre Thacks

SkipAreas

33.7 Vo

48.lVo3543s8

199

186

184

253

189

282109

20687

154120163

3M Stannrk 1000

3M Stannrk 1200

Ennis HPS-5

þoplexlS9O *

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire TrackSkip Areas

Tire Tracla

Skip Areas

Tire Tracla

Skip Areas

38.17o

53.6Vo

û.67o86.97o

10.47o

15.7%o

25.7Vo

36.37ol

244

265

144'131

4n432

103

136

r39

245

'256

372

236

320

106

188

146

267

2rÐ

3'A

2&348

45

93

56

lv

tz7194

lz2lsl

16L50

118

210

63

96

101

ta7

n4A2

D62t2

58

lv

71

189

t63231

IA25t

t76r82 116

0Cum¡lative Vehicle Pas s es

(000) per thm lane1915 | 2622 1, 3291 : ñn6t t422

Products and

@ate of installation)

ToUgnalReading

Retained

Date of Reading:

2W19-Aprl2GJul r3-Nov

2æs

19-Jan 22-Jtl, 31-Oct

!+ hoduct placed on Gl7-04: cum¡lative vehicle passes at tìrrc of last neasurenrnt was 2,198,000

l4

Page 20: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 10: Retrorefleetivity Results for Longitudinal White Tape Product$ o.n PCC Surtace

SkÍpÂr,eæ 55JVo2.2Å2Í0?rt830s3532804,25

vrg421ïlre ïþæks 29,$Vo118951302022ß2A'¡etæe

Lts3%40328s381488431330350skipAreas4&w325TÍeftacla 87,WoffiwT16500

3N4Stan:a&3mIES

851Ð1621811&f148X1$<ipfueas 35.\Eo

87ïhèTr"¿elß 15.@o1í7T93875T316BL1ffiÞüable

13912618-1a5m16l2ffi v,4,qo

18:.8qa4830w113113w?57TfoeTÍackBI-l5ffiDu¡able

3t7301418SkþArcæ; 45ßlp190186t1,LNL9.t%38S:I74106

,?A9t9418TirelìækAïÌvI40mSuoerDuff

4Ø548Skbl\æ¿rs 6t.8%33S358y7Mffi3m317ffilite lÍacKs 2A.7EoI91ß1932ø

ATTvI30üItuwD¡tvSlipAreas &.699:2ßLfi,2NYT3833õ5.ffi

138130'w3CI6ñ2TreTraele D'SVa177

S\¡elco DiîËctorg0

vxS*iaA¡€as- 3l.4Vo%tl%1258N47óyl142101130LWM:)ffiv,nIÌre lfacKs ß.6%

$raico Director60

1S252'SkiD Areas 57.Mot4r49t%1957nt76155mtfie lrâcKs M.M886285l:&:

SørcoDæctor35

rgríl$n6T0O¡ru¡lative rr'ehieb Pæscs

ffffi)perthrulauç4gBw26n

}'1.{ovruutl9Aor 31,&r?-Jt;J.1trApr19Jan

m5M(Date-0-f instellatioa)

7otþinalReading

ktained

Date o.f-Reading:Ià¡ducts ¿urd

lfuiteTaoesnftniçrete¡

15

Page 21: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 11: Retrsrefleetivity Results forLongitudinal Yellow Tape Produût$ on PCC Surface

250Skip.Areas &99o196ftz194249n5194

163249Tlre 4839-oL1280113tfft2t5Arer&o

S,kio Areas 153ffi28tuû18it278 II8:79o.259

ú8i7an5Iîe lfacKs ffiIYa'199143rn?41

3MStar¡rilrk380[FS

,Skip Areas 7088105B73w 45;SVp55

l.fie lriacKs 304s6l4759119 37

BLltrEu¡abb3LZVo

179125193 8,it.4E6Lsl111141188

59lffit26u010E190TAe 46,VBL1500Durable

89

v5,MSkipAnas 75,r%añ729l33043CI495

w2193927341LTircTracls 2A\%I8'3

.{ïM4000SuuerDufy

196teSkip Areas 147.ïVawn0r99B8313

'2A9776r68T,ïeTfåck$ û,5Vø1017:l130167

AIïvI30@'Ileavy Duty

Sldp Á.reas 39AVO150743158230n02Ð382

163166wïre]}äelc 24.6%9192.%,ïvSwarcoDirector90

TØzßSkip Areas Ð*5V¿184t4l176zÐn0tw1ß%TireTracls e.wr43111119lSrl

SwarcoDhectorffi

SftbAre¿x zLA2:ñ25:TNil3Un6?ß9 7?;5Va

7ß32r0288TheTracks 47."4{a137,79L14zffiSwareoDirector35

wn6t0Ch¡rulative Yehicle P¿s ses

f000)Berthru laaeAgn32VL'Æn1915

20Jul19.Apr 3l-Oet?9-Tú19"Aor19-Jan3.fübv

2@4(Þ¿te of irrst¡¡llarion) 206ftoducts and %Odgiael

kadingRetâined

&llowTaþeo¡'Ooncæte:

16

Page 22: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

49.3Vo

58.5Vo

516

501

242

258

321357

310

392

2t6301

161

223 2932s0

ArerageTlre TlacksSkipAreas

13.67o

'l8.3Vo

'71.7%

83.1Vo

11.8Vo

29.2%o

'4.27o

43.4Va

5t3

3y

Ø1613

562

5&

481

415

lsl229

2t2309

426

535

M494

130

194

t43241

331

n3

2û358

234

n7

324

305

2M262

220

2q7

493

503

363

398

!

t28t54

w133

n3468

354

372

258

329

2U2A

115

r79

96

148

211

233

t62189

3M Stannrk 1000

3M Stanark 1200

Ennis HPS-5

EpoplexlS90

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire TraclsShp Areas

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire Tracks

Skp Areas

Orm¡lative Vehìcle Pas ses

('000) per thru lane2622,3291 .ñ23t4226r0 1975

VoOngnalReading

Retained

Date of Reading:

2W19-Apr ' 2GJul

2tn5

l9-Jan 31-Oct19-Apr I 22-Jtl3-Nov

hoducts and

@ate of installation)

Table 12: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC Surface

White on Concrete:

Table 13: Retroreflectivity Results for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC Surface

'Yellow on Concrcte:

l*hoductplacedon Gll-V;cumrlativevehiclepasses attineof lastûeasurenæntwas . 2,198,000

Arerage

Tlre Tracks

SkipAreas

51.57"

60.lVo

271

269

1s9

166206208

184

247

136 . 99

201 ¡ 138

155

183

3M Starnrk 1000

3M Starrnrk 1200

Ennis HPS-5

þoplextS90

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Tire Tracls

Skip Areas

ll4.57o

116.57o

Q.1%

67.57o

15.87o

18.97o

149Vo

17.57o

137

r31

493

485

452

455

42

50

97

195

267

332

332

413

t]t9

42

s2

t62r0

20

51

78

s2

280

n4308

234

325

'36

38

ffi'43

353

338

24

4l

6'7

159

35

32

lÆIN

\12

znAI251

217

n7217

AI

13l

14

2622 32n ' 4923tvt5t4D6l0Currulative Vehicle Pas s es

('000) per thru lane

ToGgnd,Reading

Retained

Date of Reading

2W 2W5

l9-Jan , 19-Apr 22-Jtll9-Apr , 2GJul SNov -Oct3l

hoducts and

(Date of instalJation)

11

Page 23: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

COLOR READINGS

Tables 14 through 21 present the chromacity readings for each product and test location. Figures

6 through 13 show the color readings for each product plotted on against the ASTM D 6628-03

and FIfWA 23 CFR Part 655 acceptance limits. Figures 6, 8, 10, and 12 present product

performance based on acceptance limits for the x and y readings. Similarly, Figures 7 ,9, ll, and

13 present product performance based on the "Y" value.

For white longitudinal products, the x and y chromacity readings for all products were well

within the acceptance regions under both the ASTM and FFfWA standards (Figures 6 and 8).

However, the luminance factor "Y" readings have reduced significantly for all longitudinal

products since placement and are all below the minimum specified in both ASTM and FIfWA

standards (Figures '7 and 9). Tape products have retained the highest percentage of the initial

luminance ("Y") readings. Also, the luminance factor "Y" for products on the AC test deck were

generally higher than on the PCC test deck.

For the yellow longitudinal products, the chromacity readings have reduced substantially more

than the white products from their initial values for the x and y readings as well as the "Y"

readings. With respect to the x and y readings, all but one of the products fell outside of both the

FFIWA and ASTM acceptance ranges (Figures 8 and 12). A complete listing of the status of each

product with respect to the chromacity thresholds is presented in Table 30 in the Preliminary

Evaluations section.

18

Page 24: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

0.40

0.35

0.30

o'25 o'30 x coordinate

o'35 o'40

Figure 6: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC Surface PlottedAgainst ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits

Yendor and hoduct

Figure 7: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FFfWA Acceptance Limits

ã

oo

Whíte-Skip @lwhite-Tire ¡ ¡'ASTMWhiteMin

-FH\ryAWìiteMin50

45

û35

^? 30

(!

=25¡-20

15

10

5

0ôØJ

ooo

lll

ON

>'Ø

Ooo

Øz

H

oI

¡êo

Jcq

oIHoI

Øôts

ÉÉ

f¡ì

ao

Ø

HØOOo

?

!

ooo

k

Oôoo

ìØ

ØHæ

àØz

-FWIIAWhite- - ASTMWhite

tr Skip Area Readings

x Tire Track Readings

I

_lI

I

I

_lI

I

I

_lI

I

I

rtr(tr.i-l-

llIIlì

___I___ ltìtttt

___I___ 1ttttll

___-L___-!tltlll

___l___ llltltl

I

I

I

II

I

I

I

I

I

t-I

I

I

I

d

l//-r---/r---

itrt/ \l---

I

I

I

TI

I

I

I

I

I

I

TI

T-

T

T

---1 -l---

tllltl-l----¡tltltt

l- - |

ttttìll- --ltltltl'l----ltltltl

I

I

I

II

I

I

1I

I

I

I

rl

18

141415 15

118

202121

n

7 ß11

20 2ß

t9

Page 25: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

0.55T

T

l

f

ttrItrl_ttt'- I f I

ttlfTlltt- l--f I

ttt

ttlrtlrtt

-_r- - | Irtt_ttÌtttt-- | Trtt

0.50

0.40

0.35

0.40 0.4s 0.50x coordinate

0.55 0.60

Figure 8: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC Surface PlottedAgainst ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits

Yellow-Skip @YellLow-Tire r r . ASTM Yellow Min.

-FHWA

Yellow Min. -':- FHWA Yellow Max

50

45

Yendor and hoduct

Figure 9: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on AC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits

5.40

¡<oI>¡

n35

=30Cg

=25¡-20

15

10

5

0 OqØJoÊoof!

OON

Øz

Øù

ÉÊ

f¡l

OO

à(h

Hoo

¡c0

oO

¡cô

!ØOo

F

OI!oHìØ

oI

Ø

HiE

OO

L<

oôoc>Ø

ØHOæ

Ø

F

F

ts

ts

t+

+

+

tlr- - ts - -t- - + -rtt- h- l- + -

rtt- - ts - -t- - + - -

ttt--ts--t f -ttt

F

ts

F

ts

Yellow

- - ASTM Yellow

D Skip Area Readings

x Tire Track Readings

t

t

I

tr

tr

tr

t+

-t I

t

2

,ztr t-

tr

rtr

l

f

a

l

tr

T

tt1 t-tl

-1trtt1tr¡trtr/

ìtr

ttì_ Itt

I -Ttt1_- rtt

-Tlt

I

-l¡

-----t _

I-I

-t--I

lttllatlrï - -t- - -lttrT__l---r -tlr_ t--t- --tlr

t - -t- - -t - -tttt_l--t--t- a-tltl

-t--f I iltlr

--f

I

-tr1

tttttrttttllt

-r r I r

11 tO 10 11

88

14 l4t415

20

20

Page 26: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

0.40ttlltllltlllI_ ¡ I - - tr f

-l

-

rlllttllrtllr -- - | trtttltrtltrllI -t-'-- | trltlltttltrllt- I _l--- htìllttllttll

tlt¡tif1llttllTIttItlltsttlllllts -ftttttt

-l

0.35

0.30

0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40x coordinate

Figure 10: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC SurfacePlotted Against ASTM and FIIWA Acceptance Limits

Vendor and Product

Figure 11: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal White Products on PCC SurfaceCompared to the ASTM and FHWA Acceptance Limits

d

E¡r

'Whire-Skip lRlwhite-Tirc ¡ - rASTMWhiteMin

-F[{WAWhrteMin50

45

Q

35

530cË

- t(

¡-20

l5

l0

5

0

tr!oþìØ

oooo

õØ

oIAoIØ

oôCò¡xÈoaf¡l

oOd

àØ

HØOoOt

F

Øfrãdt¡l

ôÍOOO

F-

oooàØz

ØGJ

o

Ø

ooIJÊa

HO

¡ca

- L- t---

--t-- -L-

I

I

I

!I

I

I

+

F

t,/

/'l

'i. \

ì

l

llllrltltltlllll

-FWHAWhite- - ASTMWhite

¡ Skip Area Readings

x Tire TrackReadings

- -: --r---

I

---t---

tr7,

'/

i\

ts

12 tz14u 14 74t5 15

tq 192r zo

1012

1616

lolo lo s

16 t5

27

Page 27: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

0.55

0.50

v

0.45

0.40

0.35

0.40 0.45 0.50x-coordinate

0.55 0.60

Figure 12: Chromacity "x - y" Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC Surface

Plotted Against ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits

Vendor and hoduct

Figure 13: Chromacity "Y" Color Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Products on PCC Surface

Compared to the ASTM and FIfWA Acceptance Limits

Yellow-Skip E:l:t.-tYellow-Tire - - -ASTMYellowMur

-FHWAYellowMm

-..É*FF{WAYellowMa)c50

45

40

35

c!

i-20

15

10

5

0IHo

Ø

HobÈØ

âØOo

F

H:EOoo

F

OâHoo!d

Ø

Øô.

Él¡l

Õ6ØJoÀo

fr.l

ON

Øà

Oo

Ø

aOo

¡Ê0

Øûlo

àØà

aO€Jcq

KG+ãt-

- FHWA Yellow

- - ASTM Yellow

D Skip Area Readings

x Tire Track Readings

.7d xF..l

á

x,LËa

\\

\

88 lo 11 1l to11

8.11oql1 ro

16 ts15 15

89

22

Page 28: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 14: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on AC Surface

White on AC:

AEr-qg". "

Tlre TiacksAreas

Swarco Director 35

Swarco Director 60

Swarco Director 90

ATM 3000Heavy DutyTire Tracks

ATM 4000 SuperDuty ",

Tire Tracks

Skip- Areas

BL 1500 Durable

- Tire Track

, Qkip Arqag

BL 1600 Durable

3M Starrark 380IES

Tire Tracks

Areas

Areas

AI.pp

Areas

Shp Areas

Skip.ôpql

Tire Tracla

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracks

C\mulative Vehicle Pas s es

thru lane

@ate of installation)

Products and

0.318 0.338 60 0.328 0.345 16 0.325 0.343 16 0.322 0.340 23 0.325 0.343 t718

0.327 0.344 t5 0.323 0.341 19

0.324 0.342 t80.318 0.338 63 0.327 0.344 19 0.323 0.341 13 0.322 0.341 24 0.323 0.341 0.327 0.343 l4

0.320 0.339 71 0.331 0.341 23 0.330

0.319 0.338 14 0.328 0.346 28 0.328

0.318 0.331 69 0.328 0.344

0.343

22 \sn 0344

0.317 0.336 74 0.326 27 0.324 034t

0.319 0.339 & 0.328 0.346 15 0.328

0.342 Il0.342 16

03M0.346

ù ons0325

0.344

0.343

0342

0.343

26 0.328 0.345 24 0329 0.346 16 0328 0345 2t29 0.327 0.345 23 0.329 0.346 18 0.328 0.345 t9

l815

18

l6

25

24

0324

0.3u.0:326 0.34.4

032s 0.342

0.330 0.345 15 0.324 0342 18

0.341

0.342

0.322 0.341 20 0.321 0.345 20 0.321 0.340

0.321 03N 25 0325 0.344 t8 0.323 0.342

18

t] 0.328 0.343 13 0.325 0.342 t6

0.342 16 0.321 0.345 13 0.329 0.346 lr 0.323

0.342 18 0.323 0.340 ll 0.326 0.343 l0 0.3230.319 0.338 6t 0.327 0.345 21 0.324

0.321 0342 69 0.325 0.343 15 0.323 0.340

0.3390.321 0.343 ß 0.326 0.344 15 0.322

0.315 0.335 13 0.328 0.34s li o.zzs ß;420.315 0.335 73 0.329 0.345 14 0323 0.341

0.346 . t.?

0.:342 19

0.323, 0.340 17

0.322 0.339 20

ì¿12

0.321 0339 26

3r0.321 0.340

0.323

0.323

t613

0.326

0.322

03n 28 0.342 11

0342 28 0.34t 25

0.321

ún 9.]!4 11

0.343 17

0.319 0.3N M0.319 0.339 52

0.320 0.341

0.3400320

0.3 t6

0.327 0.343 15

0.325 0.342 11

9.32+. 0.343

0.322 0.340

t2 0.322

10 0.321

0.326

0.323

0.343 12

0.339 t40.326 0.343

0.326 0.342

0323

0.323

43 0.326 0.343

48 0.326 0.344

t3 0.325

t6 0.320

0.343 12 0321 0:339 ?o0.339 19

0.325 0.343 12 0.326 0.343 t3 0.322 0.341 16

0.339 9 0.321 0.323 03N 13 0.327 0.343 11 0.323 0342 20

43 0.328 0.346 13 0.322 0.339 17 0.318 0.337 24 0.321, 0.340 18 0.326 0.344 13 0.322 03N 18

50 0.329 0.346 16 0.321 0.340 13 0.318 0.338 23 0.321 0.3,m rc 0.325 0.342 12 0.322 0.342 200.3 t40.336

0.335

r9750 6l 1422 2622 3216 4¡,23

YX YX Yx Yx YX YX YX

19-Jan 19-Apr 19-Jul 31-Octl9-Apr 2GJul 3-Nov

2005

of ReadingDate

2W%orignalYReadingRetained

29.4Va

32.0Vo

2I.8Vo

11.9Va

3e.1E?

3I.lVa

T,þ.vo28.07o

36.,7:'/:

30.87a

25.7Vo

21.0%

25.87a

30.07o

37.lVa

40.9Va

4l.2Vo

40.07o

23

Page 29: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 15: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC Surface

Yellow on AC:

Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es

thru lane

@ate of installation)

Products and

A

ski AreasTire Ttacks

Swarco Director 35

Ti'e Tracks

Swarco Director 60

Swa¡co Director 90

ATM 3000 Heavy DutyTire Tracks

ATM 4000 SuperDutyTire Tracks

BL 1500 Durable

BL 1600Dumble

. ....$kip Are_ag

3M Starnark 380IES

Tire Tracls

Tire Tracks

Areas

Areas

Shl Areas

Skip Areas

Skp Areas

Ti¡e Tmcks

Sha $,paq

Tire T¡ack

Tire Track

1422 r9150 661 2622 3276 4¡,23

Yx YX YX Yx Y YX YX X

Date of Readins

19-Jan l9-Apt 19-Jul 31-Oct2GJul 3-Nov

2cn5

19-Apr

2W

0.410 13

0.412 t30.480 0.452 37 0.431 0.419 12 0.418 0.413 12 0.432 0.424 l7 0.422 0.416 13

0.411 0.404 11 0.413

0.413 0.405 11 0.411

0.483 0.4s3 39 0.441 0.424 14 0.408 0.405 9 0.430 0.424 t6 0.422 0.417 13

0.494 0.462 q 0.4s1 0.430 ls 0.435

0.491 0.4Ø 46 0.463 0.431 18 0.430

0.426

0.423

13 0.425 0.418

A oAry 0.406

- -0,+:o0.43r

0.420 t20.416 l1

0418 20

0:418 17

0.440 0.431

0.436 0.430

l5t4

.9.Q\0.4r9

l3 0.446 ddi 1.2 o.q+z 'o.nt

ist2 0.454 0.442 19 0.446 0.433 15

11 0.413 0408 9 0.419 0415 11 04t1 04ll 9 0418 0407 9 0405 0M 80.487 0.458 32 0.442 0.425

0.490 0.4ñ 36 0.454 0.434 14 0.398 0.398 1 0.415 0.411 10 0.408 0.405 1 0.410 0.4a 7 0.N3 0.405 8

1 0.446 0.435 18 0.436' 0.428 13 0.428 0.4t2 lr 0.405 0.401 t40.49t

0.491

0.4û .71 0:47 9.-+26

0.4(fr 31 0.452 0.430

0.472 0.448 4'7 0.424 g"4ls

0.4210.4'72 0A48 4'7 0.43r

0.435 0.427 14 0.41û 0.431 13 0.429 0.417 10 0.4n 0.421 12

0.415 0.455 48 0.431 0.422 t4 0.443 0.433

0.416 0.455 49 0.438 0.426 15 0.431 0.426

10 0.416

8 0.409

2r .9.42623 0.425

0.394

0.401

0.4s4 0.445 29 0.444 0.433

0:438

0.425

0.421

2,0

l8

1?" ".9411

rs .9.12J

0.Æ0.391

0.454 0.445 29 0.443

13 0.430 o.nï' ù o.n+ 0.411 14

8 0.429 0.4U 17 0.418 0.41,6 13

0Áæ 0.403 11 0.398 0.400 t00.406 0.399 ll 0.403 0.405 11

0.399 9 0.402 0.398 9 0.405

0.406

0.4M 11

0.4M 9 0.398 0.394 9 0.M 10

0.394 0.395 9 0.399 0.Æ6 .!.2

0.405 ll

0.482

0.485

o:HJ"

-0.1+_8,

32 0.421 0.411 1l 040? 9401 e

0.394 0.393 7

0.M0.4tJ2

0.414 0.411

0.419 0.416

t2t3

0.403

0.40835 0.438 0.422 13

0.413 0.449 21 0.418 0.413 Ll 0.n20.478 0.452 -31 0.42,9, ^0.411 lt 0.397

0.461 0.435

0.439

30 0.411 0.42 11 0.4t2 0.460.473 34 0.420 0.405 13 0.4U 0.399

11, 0.391 o 398 ?t2 o.Qt 0.403 10

0.474 16 0.4t6 0.408

0.ß6t4

0.4t7 17 0.411 12

0.4r1

0.M 0.386 0.388 8 0.399

13

r00.421

0.428"0,39q0.395

l0 0.411 0.405.

12 0.413 0.,108i3t4

7a orirgnalYReadin,e

Retained

ls3'-E:32.44o

37.5Va

30.77o

37,!V_o

37.67o

q5%36.7Va

ns7..43.,8V9.

29.5Vo

20.9Va

22.8Va

25.3Va

34.j%o

22.4Vo

44.5Vo

4l.7Vo

24

Page 30: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

White on AC:

Table 16: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface

thru lane

Vehicle Passes

@ate of installation)

Products and

SK

Tire TiacksAreas

A\Er3ge"_*

3M Starna¡k 1000

3M Starnark 1200

Ennis HPS-5

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Ti¡e Track

Areas

Areas

rs90lex

Tire Tmcks

Tire Tracls

Y Yx YX Yx Yx YX X

0342 t80.3240325 0.344 150.3 19 0.339 60 0 .327 0.344 2t 0.32s 0.343 0.323 0.341 I 0.32s 0.343 0.327 0.344

0.319 0.339 62 0.325 0.344 26 0.323 0.341 12 0.322 0.340 21 0.323 0.341 14 0.328 0.34s 13

t5 0.324 0.340 t6 0.326 0.343 t4 03n 0344 t2 0.326 0.343 13

9 0.322 0.339 t3 0.324 0.339 9 0.330 0.345 t2 0.324 0.342 15

17

18

0.320

0322

18

0.342 0.3260.317 0.339 61 0.325 0.344 25 0.322

0.3t1 0.338

0.31',7 0.338 6s 0.323 0.341 33 0.324 0.343 15

0.317 0.337 63 0.328 0.346 28 0.325 0.343 19

0.342 30 0.323

0.324 0.343

L7

0.329 0.344 19

0.327 0.346 t5 0.325

0.346 15

18 0.326

0.340

0323 0.340

0342

0.340.341

2t 0".321

15 0.32t

0.340

0.34r

24

24

13

ll

0.14s

o'34?

110.?20 _9:319. þ3.0?,.K_0.344 23-_.0.323 0.341 e...0.322

0.32t _034A "sS q+6 9.34) 14..0-328

0.321 0.341 58 0.326 0.345 22 0324

þ3_ 0.3_?6_,p3y_ 2! 93"?3.,9;?42

0323

0.323

0.339 19 0.324 0.340

323 0.340 t6 0.324 0.343

0.342 22 0.321 0342 ',A 0.328 0.345

0.344 20

0.327 03420.325 0.341 11 0.3230.340 60 0.326 0.343 11 0.325 0.343 14 0.

03260.3u

0.].11

0.343

6I 19150 t422 2622 3276 4îJ23

x Y

2005

l9-Jan3-Nov 19-Jull9-Apr 2GJul 31-Oct

of Readins

37.27a

27.5Va

23.8Vo

23.2Vo

24.lVo

28.4Va

26.6Vo

22.5Vo

7o OrÌgnalYReadingRetained

29.ïVo24.5Vo

25

Page 31: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 17: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface

YellowPo on AC:

Tire TiacksAEragç

"

3M Starrnrk 1000

3M Starrark 1200

Ennis HPS-5

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracla

Tire Tracks

*

Areas

Areas

Tire Tracks

Areas

Cumulative Vehicle Pas ses

thru lane

@ate of installation)

a¡rd

YX YX YX YX YX Yx YX

19-Apr 2GJul 19-Jan 19-Jul 3l-Oct3-Nov

2æ5

19-Apr

2MDate of

0í6q q.J_lt "l"l 0.49: _0.41s 16 0.42t 0.40e 14 0.42s.0..41s 17.0.41s 0.406 13,. 0.402 .0.394 t2 0.4.06 0.401 12

0.398 0.390 10 0.403 0.399 t20.334 31 0.455 0.425 21 0.409 0.402 l0 0.425 0.417 17 0.408 0.403 110.368

T4

12

0.494

0.395

0.492 0.444 44 0.430 0.Æ7 11 0.411 0.401

-- 0.& 0.44t 35 0.418 0.415 13 0.432 0.429

0.+n 29 0.428 0.421 t9 0.433 0.430

0.40 0.410 15 0.399

0.421 0.417 2t 0.397 0.395

t9 0.411 0.407 12 0.400 0.391

--: ö.4i613

t2

11 0.405 0..39-3 9

9 0.399 0.388 9"0.400.

e. 0.416 o.ry rc 0.420 o.pl.-r? g4-1?,""94p3

0.421 15 0.4il 0.400 9 0.415 0.410 12 0.4A2 0.399

10, .0i4157 0.418

14 0.43r1t 0.436

0.415

0.421

0.410.410

25

24

15

l5

0.415 0.405

0.416 0.M

t2

t2

12

t20.s01 0.448 44 0.422

0.500 0.448 43 0.458

0441,F ory 0.416 14 0.32, 0.388

12 0.4rr o.Nr 12 0.398 ., 0.390 .10 01401 *9.44213 0.4tJ2 0.398 9 0.394 0.386 9 0.4M 0.401

12 0.4rs_ 0.N1

9 0.lm1 0.396

0.386 0.389

0.391 0.392

0.478 0.439 38 0.452 0.420 t9 0.411 0.Mo 478 0.439 37 0A41 0.414 15 0.430 0.472

0 6l 14.22 r9'75 2622 3n6 ñ23

VooriginalYReadingRetained

30.9Va

33.2Va

37.1v1

31.07a

Z7.LVa

28.3Vo

28.9Va

26.4Vo

4O.2Va

36.6Va

26

Page 32: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

White on C-oncrete:

Table 18: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Tape Products on PCC Surface

Tire Tbacks

Areas

Swarco Director 35

Swarco Director 60

Swarco Director 90

AT.\4 4Oq Super.Duty

Tire Tracks

BL 1500 Durable

BL 1600 Durable

3M Starnark 380fES

Ti¡e Track

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracls

Areas

Arqas

Areas

Areas

Areas

Areas

Tire Tracks

Tire Track

Tire Tracks

Ski¡ Areas

Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es

thru lane

@ate of installation)

Products and

0.318 0.338 s6 0.328 0.346 20 0.325 0.343 10 0.323 0.34t 21 0.325 0.342 15 0.327 0.344 ll 0.323 0341 16

0.318 0.338 57 0.325 0.343 29 0.324 0.342 tt 0.322 0.340 22 0.324 0.34r 0.326 0.343 lt 0.32s 0.342 1615

0 6t 1422 r915 2622 3n6 4023

YX YX YX YX YX Yx YX

2ffi5

19-Ja¡ 19-Jul 31-Oct

2Wl9-Apr 20-Jul 3-Nov 19-Apr

0.320 0.338 72 0.330

0.320 0.339 1r 0.32'7

0.318 0.337

2t 0.329 034637 03n 0343

0343 t2

0342 t2

0;34O

9.3+

0.318 0.337

0.328 0.345 25 0.328

0.325 0.343 37 0.325

0.344

0.341

0.346 10 0.325

0344 9 0.324

0.343 8

0.344 8

0:327 03440.325 0.342

0.324 0:W_ 11

0.322 0.341 19

0.347

0.344

12 0,176

t4 0.325

0.344 32

0.343 27

,0.3390.339

24

25

0.328

03280326

0.344 13 0.328 0.345 19

0.330 0.346 12 0.327 0.344 19

0.342 2t 0.328 0.344 14 0.328 0.344 rl 0.321 0.344 15

0.34r 19 0.323 0.341 13 0.327 0.343 9 0.326 0.343 16

0.323 0.343 15 0.325 0.342 9 0.321

67

6l

0.319

0.319

0.?2t 0.34r ."48 0.!25

0.320 0.3Æ 48 0.323

20 0.324 .0342 " tt 0.3t922 0.325 0.343 12 0.320

0.344 r0 0.325

0.342 8 0.325

0.344 13 0.323

0.343 12 0.324

15

15

t4

0.338

0.339

69 0.328 0.345 t7 0.325

69 0.326 0.344 3t 0.325 0.323 0.342 t4 0.325 0.343 l1 0.325

0.318 0.336 50 0.331

0.317 0.336 53 0.326

.q,?le 0 ?40 sl 0.126

0.319 0.339 5l 0.324

0.320 0340 47 0.327

22 0.324 0.342 9

.9.3y 18 0.325

0.342 26 0.326

0342 r.1 0.323

0.343 12 0.322

03240320

n -^9,??818 q325 o-325

0.339

0.343

l0 0.320 0.339 t411 0.323 0.342 16

0.34t

0.341

ot250.3u

0.3+0.342

0:344

0.343

26

21

t514

0322 0340 20

2t

t4

0343

0.344

0342

0.345

0.342

0.342 15

0.338 2t0.3q5_". 0:34_2

0.3u 0.342

0.327 0.343 8 0.320

0.324 0.340 l0 0.325

Oit.sn o.tn0.323 0.3N

12

l3

20 0.324

3t 0.323

0.342

0.34r9 0.323 0.341

9 0.320 0.340

t720

0.324

0.324

13

11

o,!o0.34r0.320 03Q 46 0.323

0.315 0.335 49 0.331 0.348 \4 0.321 0.340

0.315 0.336 48 0.330 0.341 21 0.322 0.342

11 0.318

12 0.318

0.338 21

0.338 2t0.343- l_1

0.344 t00.32t 0.340

0.321 0.340

0.321 0.340 14 0.325

0.321 0.340 13 únt5l6

28.5Vo

29.3Vo

40.3;7o

38.77o

28.lVo

jt17,33.3Vo

3l.jVa

17.87o

l7.2Va

2l.8Va

27.3Vo

24.2Va

34.6Vo

30.6Vo

32.j%a

27.2Vo

26.4Va

% O.ìgnalYReadingRetained

27

Page 33: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Yellow on Concrete:

Table 19: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Tape Products on PCC Surface

Areas

a*tqgg-"T'rre Tbacki

Swa¡co Director 35

Swa¡co Director 60

Swa¡co Director 90

.- ., -SkipAreasATM 3000Heavy Duty

Tire Tlacks

Skip Areas

ATM 4000 Supel Duqy ..

Tire Tracks

Ski_p-Apa-9

BL 1500Dumble

Tire Tracks

Sh-p- ArepBL 1600 Durable

Skip Areas

3M Stannrk 380IES

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracks

Tire Track

Tire Tracks

Tire Tracks

Skip Areas

Areas

Areas

Cumulative Vehicle Pas s es

('000) per thru lane

@ate of installation)

Products and

x yYX vYx yYX yYX yY x yY

0.481 0.4s3 36 0.439 0.42s t4 0.39s 0.396 I 0.432 0.426 16 0.412 0.410 tt0.481 0.4s3 36 0.4s3 0.433 19 0.409 0.407 9 0.427 0.424 15 0.412 0.410 r0 0.394 0.393 8 0.413 0.411 11

0.399 0.396 8 0.411 0.410 I I

5 0.418 0.4t4 9 0.394 0.396 6 0.405 0.398 1 0.413 0.M 1

5 0.4t2 0.410 9 0.401 0.401 6 0.390 0.387 6 0.418 0.413 8

0.417

tit2

0.418

r6

9

0.495 0.4& 42 0.459

0.474 0438 3t 0.4124 0.408 t5 0.ry7

0.412 0.431 30 0.412 0.401 11 0.390

0.494 0.46s 41 0.468 0.443

0.493 0.4& 41 0.4Æ 0.429

0.489 0.461 37 0.469 0.443 20 0.39'7

0.490 o.Mr 36 0.450 0.432 13 0.391

0.494 0.4& 41 0.467

0.431 0.423 11

0.396 0.400 10 0.383 0.386 7 0.N1 0.401

0.429 0.422 11

0.ñ2 11 0.417 0.414

0.4t2 14 0.419 0.411

8

8

ll

"9.fçg. 0f500A69 0.450

0.&0.485

0.453

0.452

0:448 35

0.448 35

38

38

0.445

0.463

0.427

0.435

0.435 0.424

0.436 0.424

0.431

0.442

15

21

12 0.388

20 0.ñ2

14 0.4u)

t4 0.430

13

20

0:390

0.399

0.392

0.403

0.394

0.405

0.392 1

0.396 6

0.407 l,q 0.448

0.423 13 0.450

0.391

0.391

8 0.425

t0 0.422

0.419

0.413

0.408

0.414

0.434

0.437

0.431

0.434

0.4q.. u0.441 25

0.411 15

0.4t1 15

0.420

0.4r1

0.452 0.438 t70.441 0.432 15

t'7 0.421

20 0.423

0.419

0.421

0.432 0.421

0.421 0.422

0.417

0.410

l3t4

0.386

0.782

0,.ñ2 0.400 10

0.394 0.395 10

9.4t1"

.0:4o.5

0.405

0.398

0-399 '7 0.423

0.395 7 0.429

0:406

0.N7

9 0.426

9 0.434

0.418 10

0.423 11

0.42t0.426

10

1l

l515

8'

9

0.449

0.430

0.M 0.403 10 0.383 0.385 8 0.401 0.Æ2

0.M 0.ñ2 12 0.383 0.384 8 0.39 0.400

0.397 0.400

0.401 0.400

"0.393 0.395 " 6

0.405 0.M 7

Q,Æ 1l

0.Q7 t2

o.ry 10 0.395 0.394 8

0.413 11 0.398 0.391 8

0.3_84 6

0385 6

0.403 0.405 10 0.387 0.391 8 0.394 0.400 10

0,ff0.4&

0.448..

0.448

32

32

3l30

orn-2

0.455

"9+o

0.435

9.49Þ0.445

04260432

15

18

0.fl10.421

17 0.398

20 0.413

0.391

0.411

0.q20.416

9

11

0.4t40.M

0.M0.403

0.44.1 .!70.424 12

0.420

0.4t3

0 6l 1422 t975 2622 3n6 ñ23

X yY

Date of Reading

2W 2æ5

19-Jan 19-Jul 31-Octl9-Apr 2GJul 3-Nov 19-Apr

30.2Vo

3l.2Va

23.8Vo

25.8Va

37.47a

Z7.3Vo

30.lVa

35.5Vo

32.9Vo

35.OVo

28.4Va

22.97o

2n.4Vo

30.37o

23.3Va

24.3Va

4l.9Va

45.9Va

Vo OrignalYReading

Retained

28

Page 34: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

WhitePo on C-oncrete

Table 20: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on PCC Surface

Tlre TFacks

rerag9

S Areas

., -Skip Areas

HPS-5

Starnark 1200

Ti¡e Tncla

IS90

Areas

Areas

Areas

Tire Traclcs

Tire TrackStaûErk 1000

Tire Tracla

thru lane

Vehicle Passes

@ate of installation)

koducts and

0.340 63 0.327 034s 23 0.32s 0.343 11 0.322 0.340 18 0.323 0.341 t20.340 62 0.324 0.344 36 0323 0342 tl 0.321 0.340 17 0.322 0.340 13 0.324 0342 10 0.323 0.341 12

0.325 0342 10 0.323 0.341 11

0.319

0.319

0.320 0.341 63 0.329 0.341 18 0.326 0.344 9 0.322 0.34t 12 0.324 0.v3 10 0.325 0.y2 8 0.322 0.34r

0.320 0.3Æ 63 0.326 0.'.346 32 0.324 0.342 l0 0.321 0.339 t2 0.322 0.339 9 0.324 0.340 8 0.324 0.341

0.322 0.342 59 0.330 0:v9 18 0.326 0.343 9 0.323 0.339 12 0.323 0.Ur 10

0323 0.343 58 0.326 0:346 29 0.325 0.344 9 0.322 0.341 12 0.321 0.340 9

0.31'7 0.339 65 0.323 0.343 28 0.323 0.342 12 0.320 0.340 17 0.322 0.:341 l0 0.322 0.341 9 0.322 0.3,10 l00.3t1 0339 65 0.322 0.342 38 0.321 0.341 10 0.319 0.339 t5 0.321 0.341 ll 0.323 0:341 9 0322 0.342 12

0."?.3!._q{ 9}?1"9,1# _3"0_ 9:3?6_.q:?43 þ 9??t_ 0940". "?q .9,Q3_ 9:341 20 0.32e

0.337 & 0.322 0.v2 44 0.323 0.341 14 0.323 0.340 31

0.347 t5 0.324 0.344 t40.324 0.343 t4

10

10

g.?r1

0.3t7

9.?+. "94J.....1_. "0-1P 013e

0.323 0.341 8 0.323 0.3,10

0.323 o.vt 22 0.328 0.345 t3

0 6t 1422 t975 2O2 3276 4fJ23

YX Yx YX YX YX YX Yx

2GJul 19-Jan 19-Apr 3l-Oct3-Nov

2æ5

l9-Jul

Date of Reading:

l9-Apr

2W

18.6Vo

17.4Vo

18.3Vo

16.ZVo

18.ÙVo

22.5Va

22.5Vo

15.8Vo

15.6Vo

15.37o

VooriglnalYReadingRetained

29

Page 35: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 21: Chromacity Readings for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on PCC Surface

Yellow on C¡ncrete:

Cumulativ e Vehicle Pas s es

thru lane

@ate of installation)

ducts and

Tire Tiacks

3M Stann¡k 1000

3M Star¡nrk 1200

lex[S90 *

S-ki-p _A1e19

Ennis HPS-5

.--[Fp Areas

Tire Tmcla

Areas

Tire Track

Tire Tracls

Tire Tracla

X YYX YX YX

0.368

0.367

0.337

0.336

.407 17 0.438 0.422 l8 0.421 0.409 14 0.395 0.388 10 0.404 0.400 11

0.431 0.418 t3 0.441 0.425 t9 0.423 0.412 14 0.391 0.386 9

35 0.449 0.427 20 0.418 0

0.404 0.398 1234 0 458 0 430 26

o+s8- o.a5i sr ö.44s o..as -li -041s

0:,i0i rr 0.44s 0.428 zz o.izt0.496 0.454 50 0.459 0.428 24 0.4n 0.423 16 0.452 0.433 23 0.429 0.418

l3t4

0.467

0.455

0.427

0.413

0.497 0.454 5t 0.435 0.418 t3 0.429 0.415

35 0.4t3 0.407 9 0.423 0.416

27 0.412 0.M t0 0.420 0.413

0.443 0.423 t9 0.427 0.411

0.438 0.419 11 0.424 0.408

16 0.378 0.378 10 0.417 0.410 14

0.403 0.393 l0 0.418 0.410

0.405 0.395 11 0.417 0.411

0.391 10 0.397 0.390 9

0.388 9 0.398 0.390 10

0.458 0.426 A0.4û 0.428 26

0.4i1".. 0:f94

0.408 0.M_ 0.3% 0.388 9 0.387

0.382 0.382 1 0.392

38

5t

0.439

0.445

0.418

0.480.401 10

0.4t2 12

13

t6

13

15

0._4a 0.429 2t 0.426 0At30.445 0.430 21 0.425 0.416

11

11

15

t6

0.4u0.399

0.387

0.389

l5t6

0.494 0.451 50 0.444 0.420 t8 0.444

0 417

0 47'7.0.qe0.4Æ

t9'750 6t 1422 2O2 32'76 uJ23

x YYX YX

of Reading:

2GJul 19-Jan 19-Apr 19-Jul 3l-Oct

2W19-Apr 3-Nov

2æ5VaOrignaIYReadingRetained

_47.67o27.7%

"7þ,5Eq27.37o

24,97.9

26.57a

37.2Vo

29.LVo

25.\Va

27.77a

30

Page 36: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

DURABILITY READINGS

Durability readings are taken by two evaluators. Each evaluator makes a subjective readìng of

each marking based upon the percentage of the marking remaining in place. These percettages

are then averaged for eaeh product at Bach testlocation. Thus, the durability of a product at the

time of installation is 100. Tables 22 throttgh 29 present the durability readings for each product

and test location. All but one longitudinal products had durabilitl' values of at least 95Vo. The

lone procluct with durability in the uppor 80's and lorver 90's was the po-lyurea product Epoplex.

The RTC's QPL standards require that durability rernain at or above 98Vo fw white longitudinal

products used on heavy volume roadways, and 957a for yellow longitudinal products on heavy

volume roadways.

31

Page 37: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

9898r9898981001003lvI Stam¡irk380lES

91979696ç81CIOBt 1600Durable 95

100BI- 1500 Durable 9v9V96)59799

9898989999100100ATM 4000SuperDury

9899991001oCI,ATM 3000Heavy Du,ty 9898

rCI0Swarcs Difecto,r90 9899979B99,100

100Swarco Dircctor 60 989897)9I99,100

9898979999100r00Swarco Director 3:5

0Curnu lativ e Vehicle Fas s es

l'000) oerthru lane44233n6262219751422661

31.Oet19-Jul19-Apr3-No-v20-J¡l1-9-,4.¡,r

20CI520CI4(Date o.f in s tallation)Prod¡cts andWhite Tape on AG

Table 22:Dwabtlity Readings lor Longitudinal Wfiito Tape Products on AC Surface

32

Page 38: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

100il003M Stamark3S0IES 9898989899

9897969596981CIOBL 1600Þurable

9696100BL 1500Durable 9rr979594

.ATM 4000 SupêrDuti 98989899991001,00

qgw9899100100ATM 3000 Heavy Drrty 98

91991CIoS¡'¡r-atco Direcm¡90 98989,697

100100Swareo Direetor60 989-89799100

Swarco Þiroctor 35 9899979899100100

1&26610Cunmlative Vchicle Pas ses

fi000) oerthru lane4AZ332,V6263,21975

3-Nov2û-Jul19-Apr 31-Oct19-Ju,ll9-Apr19.Jan

20052004(Dat¿, o f i¡stallation)ProducB andYellsw Taue on Ae¡

TabLc 23: Durøbility Readings l.or Lo.ngitudinal Yellow Tape Products on AC Surfaee

33

Page 39: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

94919"19,19810û100Ennis 1JPS=5

9199100100Enoolexl-S90 889292

I00lM Sta¡oârl 1200 979797E9100100

9898991001003M Stamarle 1000 9898

4Ðn32:t62622l97st42266t0Cumulative Vehicte Pas sles

f000)'perthru lane

3-Nov20-Jul19-Apr 31;Oetl9Jull9-AÞrlg-Jan

aCI052004(Þate of installadon)DateFroduets aud

\Vhite ?olruroa on *{C;

Table ?4:Dvrablli:ty Readings for Longitudinal White Polyurea Products on AC Surface

Table 25: Durab-ility Roaùngs for Longitudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on AC Surface

* on ¿198,000euin'ulative at tillÈ of last was

w9899x001.00Ennis IIFS-S 9798

939799100Ep B1exl,S90 * 9196

3M Starnark 1200 98989799100100100

1001003M Stamark 1000 989898s9,E9

14226610Curnulative Veh icle Pas s es

l'000) rer thru laneÆ21324162922tgvs

2&Jul19.ABr 3i-Oot19-Jr¡l19-Apr,3.Nov(Date of installationl 2CI04

Produets andTellow?'oþurea on A,C;

3,4

Page 40: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

98989898981001oCI3M Stamerk3SOIES

989898989899100BI- 1600 Du¡able

9897979797,98100BL 1500Durable

9898999999t00100ATIvI- 4000 Super Duty

98989999100100100ATM 3000}treavy hity

9898999999100100Swareo Directot90

989899991001001û0Sw¿rco Dfuector 60

98999999100roCI100Swarco Direetor35

402332162622197514226610Curmrlative Vehicle Passes('000) Ber thru lane

3l-Oct19-J¡l19.ABr19-Jan3-Nov20-JuI19-Apr

2044(Date of in¡tallation) 2DA5

Froduots and lâf¡i ^'

White Tape on C-oncrete:

Table 26: Durability Readingo for Longitudinal White Tape Product oR PCC Surface

Table 27: Durability Readings forLor.lgitudinal Yellow Tapo Prodtrets CIn PCC Surface

98989898981001003M Stanrark3S0IES

9898e8e899100BL1600Durable 98

979,695959595100B,L1500Durable

9898q9c99g1CI0100ATM 400CI SuperDutv

9898999999100100AïM 3000Heavy Duty

98989899100100100Swafco Directo.r 90

)8,98999899100100Swarco Director 60

9899999999100100Swareo Director 35

4A23!2762622L9',:1514226610Crrmu lative rlehicle Fas c e,s

(000)per'hru lanc

3l-Oet19-Jul19-A.or19-Jan3-lilov2&Jul19-Aor

2005zAM(D-ate of in s t"a'llatioû)

Products andYellow TaÞ€ ot Concrète:

35

Page 41: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

9997991001CIOEnnis IIPS-S 9&98

98lq898989910010ûEooplexIS90

949€9898981001003M StàrÍrafk 1200

96979898971001003M Stamark 10O0

4æ33n626227W514226610Gur¡¡r¡lative Vehisle Pas s es

f000) nerthm lane

3l-ÕctI9-Jul19-Aor19.Jan3-Nov20-Jul19-Atrz0a4(D¿te of installctio'n)

Froducts and

White Pol¡rure,â on Conc¡ete:

Table 28: Durability Readings.for Longitudinal Whjte PolyureaProducts on PCC Suüaee

Tab1e29: Durab-ility'Readings for Longirudinal Yellow Polyurea Products on?CC Surface

2,198,CI006. eurimlfitive at finæ oflast iÌæasurenbiit lüas*

9798989B98100100F'.nnis [IPS-5

Epoplex-I^S-90 * 9898989999100

3M Staraârk 1200 95n9897w99100

961001003M Stamark 1000 969798

66t0Cutnulative Vehiele Fas s es

ll00$ oerthnr lano442312ir,62&2t9751422

19-Anr19-Jan2CI-Jul1.9-Aor 31-Oct19=Jul3-Nov{Date of ins [allatisu.) 2005zAM

Date ofReading:Produets and

lhllow F'olvu¡êå on Concrete:

36

Page 42: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

P RELIM IN ARY EVALU AT I O N S

Retroreflectivity

The white longitudinal products that have performed relatively well so far, with avenage tire/skip

retroreflectivity readings of over 180 on both the AC as well as the PCC surfaces, include 3M

Stamark 380IES, ATM 3000, Ennis IIPS-5, Epoplex LS90, Swarco Director 60 and Swarco

Director 90. On the other hand, performing poorly with values under 100 are Briteline 1500

Durable and Briteline 1600 Durable.

For yellow products, the following products performed well with average retoreflectivity

readings of at least 180, namely, 3M Stamark 380IES, Ennis F{PS-5, Epoplex LS90, ATM 4000

(on PCC), and Swarco Director 35 (on AC). Poorly performing products on both surfaces include

Briteline 1600 Durable, 3M Stamark 1000, and 3M Stamark 1200

Chromacity

For white longitudinal products, all color coordinate readings are within both the ASTM and

FHWA acceptance boxes (Figures 6 and 10). However, none of the white longitudinal products

are above the "Y" minimum value for the ASTM or FFfWA standards (Figures 7 and l1).

For the yellow products, almost all products had the x and y color-coordinates outside of both the

FIIWA and ASTM acceptance boundaries or box (Figures 8 and 12) on both the PCC and AC

surfaces. Also, the chromacity "Y" readings are generally below both the FFIWA and ASTM

minimum thresholds except for a couple on products (Figures 9 and 13).

Table 30 presents the pass/fail status of all longitudinal products placed on the Desert Inn test

deck. Readings for products marked "Skip only" indicate that the skip areas (the portion of the

marking not passing under the tire track of the lane) fall within the acceptable limit, but the

portion of the marking under the tire track does not. Some products are also marked "Tire only",

indicating that the tire tracks were acceptable, whereas the skip areas were not.

JI

Page 43: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

Table 30: ASTM and FIfWA Chromacity Pass or Fail for Longitudinal Products

Durabilit)¡

Almost all the longitudinal products had durability values essentially the same relative to the

previous readings, at close to 95Vo and above (Tables 22-29) with no significant wearing,

slippage, and/or tearing. Only Epoplex LS90 had lower durability values of about 887o and 9l7o

on the AC and PCC surfaces, respectively.

FailFailFail

Pas s

FailFailFailFail

Pas s

Pas s

FailFail

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pas s

FailPas s

Pas s

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pas s

FailFail

Pas s

FailFailFailFaiiFaiìFail

Pas s

Fail

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

YellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellowYellow

Director 35

Director 60

Director 90

3000 HD4000 sD

1500 Durable1600 Durabte

Stamark 380IES

Stamark 1000

Stamark 1200

LS90HPS-5

SwarcoSwarcoSwarcoATMATM

Brite-LineBrite-Line

3M3M3M

EpoplexEnnis

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Fail

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FailFailFail

Swarco

S warcoSwarcoATMATM

Brite-LineBrite-Line

3M3M3M

EpoplexEnnis

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

Pass

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

Pas s

WhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhiteWhite

Director 35

Director 60

Director 90

3000 HD4000 sD

1500 Durable1600 Durable

Stama¡k 380IES

Stamark 1000

Stamark 1200

LS90HPS-5

Lum ("Y")Color (x,y)Lum. ("Y")Color (x,y)Lum. ("Y")Color (xy)Lum ("Y")Color (x,v)FHWAASTMFH\ry A ASTM

ColorProductVendor PCC SurfaceAC Surface

38

Page 44: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

VI. Field Data and Preliminary Evaluations of Raised Pavement Markers

This section repofts the field measurements for retroreflectivity after installation of the raised

pavement marker (RPM) products.

RETRO RE F LE CTIV ITY READ I N G S

Table 3l below presents a summary of the letroreflectivity readings for the different

measurement periods since installation in June 2004 ap to July 2005. Although all products have

dramatically reduced retroreflectivity values, the Apex 9214R appears to be outperforming the

other two products for both the white/red and yellow/yellow products.

Table 31: Retroreflectivity Readings for RPMs

284

53

12.o

46

871

139

32.4

48

Average Retro. readingMinimum reading

Maximum readingStandard deviationNumber of samples

.Iul-05 11

I31

12.5

20

221

35

lt.224

s8I

126

38623

3021

48'76

22

2l16

30

3.5

zo

3413

60

12.1

24

11044

294

51.5

44

Apr-05 2513

41

6;7

21

2617

34

5.0

25

2410

43

9.5

26

10944

183

28.6

42

311

67

13.8

50

11651

176

36.8

28

Average Retro. readingMinimum readingMaximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples

t2I

35

1 1.6

18

25I

50

t2.226

602

131

3 8.6

24

Fel>05 7346

105

161

28

74762

268

42.t48

4l4

12

t1.448

177.1

253

s4.4

48

Äverage Retro. readingMinimum readingMaximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples

31

7

105

¿t I22

,<2

42

10.1

22

8215

186

53.2

24

5330

13

11.9

23

3519

47

7.O

28

453

'77

t8.247

219131

331

43.t48

Average Retro, readingMinimum readingMaxìmum readingStandard deviationNumber of samples

Oct-O4 t62

45

12.8

2'7

30l'l55

tl.722

11320

198

60.6

24

l59

26

5.6

18

3628

46

5.2

24

5320

103

19824

11345

20640.9

36

Jun-04 321200460

587a/

165t43183

10.8

24

240191

281

23.3

zo

318241

398

29.4

46

5338

65

6.1

50

3221'7 5

411

55.5

46

Average Retro. readingMinimum reading

Maximum readingStandard deviationNumber of s amples

t4t104

t6916622

138108

180

18 I

22

239194

267

20.2

LO

RedWhiteYellowRedWhiteYellowRedW hite YellowDes crip tion YeVYelwhite/RedYeVYel'whire/RedYeVYelWhite/RedProduct Vita-LiteGlobemarker92I ARVendor Swa¡eflexA pex

Retrorefl ec tiv ity readin g s Durango Drive

39

Page 45: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

DURABILITY READINGS

For durability, every installed RPM was inspected and evaluated on its presence, physical

condition and placement. Missing markers with and without glue backings, broken markets,

markers that slid out of place, and markers with broken glass were recorded. The number of

markers remaining in good condition were then summed and compared to the original amount of

markers placed. Table 32 shows the durability evaluation results through the most recent

observation period, July 2005. It appears that with over 93Vo of the markers still in good

condition, all products are performing well except the yellow/yellow Swareflex Vita-Lite, which

appear to be losing their the reflective glass surfaces entirely. The Apex 921 AR has a few

markers having broken glass surfaces.

Table 32:Dwabllity readings for RPMs

43I0

0

0

6

461

0

0

0J

490

0

0

In

500

0

0

0

0

930

0

6tt

1

970

0

3

0

0

Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place

Markers slide out of place

Onlv slas s broken/mis sins

July-05

980

0

2

0

0

Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place

Markers slide out of place

Only glass broken/missing

April-05 431

0

0

0

6

461

0

0

0

J

500

0

0

0

0

500

0

0

0

0

940

0

5

0

I

Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place

Markers slide out of place

Only glass broken/mis s in g

February-05 441

0

0

0

5

47I0

1

0

1

50t¡

0

0

0

0

500

0

0

0

0

940

0

5

0

1

980

0

2

U

0

500

0

0

0

0

1 000

0

0

0

0

1 00t,

0

0

0

0

Good conditionMarkers only missingMarkers & glue missingMarkers broken in place

Markers slide out of place

Only glas s broken/mis sing

November-04 490

0

0

0

I

480

0

0

0

2

50

0

0

0

0

0

-5050100100Ouantitv ins talled 5050

W hire/RedReflectiveYeVYel

White/RedReflectiveYeVYel

whire/RedReflectiveDescription YeVYel

Glo b emarker9214RProduct Vita-LiteSwareflexApeXVendor

40

Page 46: of Evaluation Clark Markings - Perimeter Bicyclingrtcws.rtcsnv.com/mpo/streets/Files/TestDeck/2006 01 10.pdf · Executive Summarv The primary objective of this project is to perform

YIL Tentative Dates for Fului'e Data Collection

The following are tentative field data collection schedules for the remaining pavement marking

evaluation project. It is anticipated that the respective local transportation agencies with

jurisdiction over the test locations will provide traffic cont¡ol for the field work. Upcoming field

data collection dates:

üreek of January 16,2006

Week of April 16,2006

These dates a.re subject to change, depending on availability of roadways, weather, and other

unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances.

4L