23
Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Network Field Services

Capacity Constraints in NFS

1

Page 2: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Content

• Introduction• Scope• Modelling the numbers• Impact of Top 200 Gold, Silver and Bronze

exchanges• Areas of capacity shortage and surplus• Proposed process• Criteria

2

Page 3: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Introduction

• NFS goes through a yearly cycle where work goes into backlog during summer months, particularly in Gauteng Central and NER Regions and to a lesser extent in the Eastern Region

• This situation has the effect that the KPI`s and the customer service severely deteriorate during this period. The backlog also has the effect that work carried into the new financial year jeopardizes the performance for the New Year right from the start of that year.

3

Page 4: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Scope

• This presentation does not take into account the fact that approximately 90% of TSA Revenue is generated from 600 exchanges out of 19319 exchanges.

• We can however say that the requirement to move staff into critical areas is an immediate need.

• We do experience staff shortages in most of the 600 exchanges, particularly in Gauteng Central

4

Page 5: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Modelling numbers

• A staff model for Commodity Services has been developed that proved to be invaluable in predicting the load and backlogs against time

5

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

W4

5

W4

7

W4

9

W5

1

W1

W3

W5

W7

W9

W1

1

W1

3

W1

5

W1

7

W1

9

W2

1

W2

3

W2

5

W2

7

W2

9

W3

1

W3

3

W3

5

W3

7

W3

9

W4

1

W4

3

W4

5

W4

7

W4

9

W5

1

Ass

Ord

ers

GC Ass (Backlog)

Ass backlog

Page 6: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Modelling numbers continues

• It is clear that once we worked the backlog down on orders we were very successful in keeping it under control

6

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

W45

W47

W49

W51 W

1

W3

W5

W7

W9

W11

W13

W15

W17

W19

W21

W23

W25

W27

W29

W31

W33

W35

W37

W39

W41

W43

W45

W47

W49

W51

Ful O

rder

s

GC Ful (Backlog)

Ful (Outside KPI)

Page 7: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

7

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Ind

ex

GC Fulfilment Index

GC Commodity Services Ful Index

GC Broadband Ful Index

• ADSL Broadband, our flagship commodity product, is lagging the overall commodity performance

Page 8: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

• The graph above is a depiction of surplus/shortages of technicians after the intake was allocated to technicians and the effect this has on the backlog

8

Page 9: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

??? No markings on previous slide

• In area marked 1, we are more than 200 TO`s short to deal with daily intake

• In are marked 2, we have surplus of staff to deal with daily intake

• Marked 3 – backlog worked down and there is a surplus of TO

• Area 4 indicates the forecast for the rest of the financial year

9

Page 10: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Impact of Gold, Silver & Bronze exchange• Top 40 gold exchanges are serviced by 25

NFS CSC– 19 of these CSC are understaffed– 4 correctly staffed– 2 overstaffed

• These shortages were calculated after redeployment of 42 staff and the appointment of 50 students in GCR

10

Service Org % Exchanges % Working Lines % Faults % OrdersCommodity 35.50% 41.70% 54.00%Broadband NA 62.30% 62.90%Data NA 63.40% 62.20%Complex Voice NA 47.30% 51.80%

Top 200 Exchanges

10%

Page 11: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

• Nationally the backlog situation is under control except for 4/5 areas as can be seen from the ADSL chart below for 2012/01/31

11

Page 12: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

• The areas that show large numbers of DSL faults outstanding are LAU`s 44, 43, 45, 31 and 24

• These areas correspond highly with the Gold, Silver and Bronze areas i.e. high revenue generating exchanges

• For NFS to improve service in these areas we need to move in staff into as a matter of urgency

12

Page 13: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Modelling numbers continues

• As seen from the backlog graph above for Gauteng Central in W1 which is the first week in April we started with a backlog of faults of approximately 14000. All the assurance orders will have missed the ITF KPI already.

• With existing staffing models it took until week 19 to start achieving the Assurance index week for Gauteng Central

13

Page 14: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Areas of Capacity Shortage and Surpluses

• Areas of surplus and shortage change during the year depending on the load situation

• Areas consistently short of staff are LAU 31, 43, 44, 45 and 24

14

Page 15: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Breakdown per Region

Central

CSC Surplus / Shortage

Dan Pienaar (Bloem) -3

Bethlehem -2

De Aar -2

Colesberg -1

Phuthaditjhaba 1

Ficksburg 1

Hamilton 1

Heilbron 1

Vryburg 1

Heidedal 2

Kimberley 2

Odendaalsrus 3

Total 1

15

Page 16: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Eastern

CSC Surplus / Shortage

Phoenix -12

Isipingo -4

New Germany -2

Kloof -2

Rossburgh -1

Howick 1

Ladysmith 1

Vryheid 2

Marburg 2

Oribi 4

Total -11

16

Page 17: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

GC

CSC Shortage

LINDEN -13

BRYANSTON -9

HALFWAY HOUSE -8

ROSEBANK -7

BENMORE GARDENS -7

RANDBURG -7

ALBERTON -5

EASTLEIGH -5

GERMISTON -5

CHLOORKOP -4

TURFFONTEIN -4

JHB-CENTRAL -4

HORISON -4

RANDFONTEIN -4

LENASIA -3

Total -90

17

Page 18: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

NERCSC ShortagePRETORIA-CENTRAL -12PRETORIA-SOUTH -12VEREENIGING -10ELLISRAS -5CARLETONVILLE -5LOUIS TRICHARDT -4VANDERBIJLPARK -4PRETORIA-EAST -3LEBOA KGOMO -2PIETERSBURG 2ITSOSENG 2STANDERTON 2GARANKUWA 2BABELEGI 2LERATO 2BELFAST 2ERMELO 2DENDRON 3GROBLERSDAL 3BRONKHORSTSPRUIT 3LYDENBURG 3GIYANI 3URANIAVILLE 3SHOSANGUVE 3MABOPANE 4KRIEL 5STILFONTEIN 5PRETORIA-NORTH 7

Total 0

18

Page 19: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Southern

CSC

Shortage / Surplus

LINTON GRANGE -2

GEORGE -3

EAST LONDON -1

HUMANSDORP -1

MTATHA -1

MOSSELBAY -2

Total -10

19

Page 20: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Western

CSCShortage / Surplus

AFRICAN WHOLESALERS -8

BELLVILLE -6

MILNERTON -6

SOMERSET-WEST -6

RONDEBOSCH -6

EPPING -4

WYNBERG -4

PAARL -4

STEENBERG -2

PROTEAVILLE 4

MITCHELLS PLAIN 4

Total -38

20

Page 21: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Process

• Based on the numbers above:-– Forced rebalance

• Firstly rebalance within then region• Secondly rebalance to Gauteng / outside the

region

• Relocation / transfer will be as per company policy

21

Page 22: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Criteria

• Productive Employees • Employees with clean records (discipline)• Good attendance record• Living the CHART values• Trainable Employees• Employees below the age of 40

22

Page 23: Network Field Services Capacity Constraints in NFS 1

Recommendation

• TO’s need to move to:

– provide excellent service in high revenue exchanges

– stop the decline in our customer base– Stem the decline in fixed line revenue

23