List of Acronymsfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files... · OJT - On-the-Job Training O/M - Operation and Maintenance PENRO - Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office

List of Acronyms

AO - Assisting Organization

AP - Assisting Professional

ASU - Administrative Support Unit

CAPWA - Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed

Area

CBFM - Community-Based Forest Management

CBU - Capital-Build Up

CENRO - Community Environment and Natural Resources Office

CFDF - Community Forestry Development Fund

CIC - CENRO Inspection Committee

CO - Community Organizing

CSD - Comprehensive Site Development

DENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DEVELOPERS - Development for Environmental and Rural Sustainability

ENRO - Environment and Natural Resources Officer

FGD - Focus Group Discussion

FSP - Forestry Sector Project

GIS - Geographic Information System

GPS - Global Positioning System

HCAAP - Help Catubig Agricultural Advancement Project

HIREDERA - Hinaga River Environmental Development Residents

Association

HLDMU - Household Land Development Management

IEC - Information and Education Campaign

LGU - Local Government Unit

MASLOG - Maslog Forest Resource Development Association, Inc.

MOU - Memorandum of Understanding

M & E - Monitoring and Evaluation

NGO - Non-Governmental Organization

NIA - National Irrigation Authority

OJT - On-the-Job Training

O/M - Operation and Maintenance

PENRO - Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office

PO - People’s Organization

SACRED - Samar Center for Rural Education and Development

SIBP - Samar Island Biodiversity Foundation

SMP - Survey, Mapping and Planning

SUSIMO - Subproject Site Management Office

SWC - Soil and Water Conservation

TPEC-MPDAI - Taft People’s Economic Council Multi-Purpose

Development, Association, Inc.

UPS - Uninterrupted Power Supply

VALUES - Visayas Association for Livelihood and Upliftment of the

Ecological Systems, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------ i

I. Subproject Description ----------------------------------------------------- 1

1. Purpose/ Objectives

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and

Actual Scope and Dimensions

B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification

Of Scope and Dimensions

C. Contribution of Subproject to

Relevant (Sub) Sectors

II. Subproject Implementation ----------------------------------------------- 17

1. Organizations for Implementing

Subproject

2. Implementation Period

3. Subproject Cost

4. Comments on Performance of

AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors

5. Other Matters Relating to

Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------------------------------------ 29

Relating to Recommendation(s)

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance

Of the Subproject Facilities --------------------------------------------- 31

1. Present Condition of Facilities

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure

For Operation and Maintenance (by year)

4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project --------------------------------------- 38

1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations --------------------------------------- 40

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the People’s Organization ---------------- 41

Table 2 : Subproject Performance ------ ------------------------------------ 44

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipment ---------------- 46

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by SUSIMO ---------------------------------- 47

Table 5a : Copra Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------------------ 49

Table 5b : Palay Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------------------- 50

Table 5c : Abaca Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------------------ 51

Table 5d : Commodity Store (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project--------------- 52

Table 5e : Sari-sari (HIREDERA)Livelihood Project--------------------------53

Table 5f : Micro Lending (HIREDERA) Livelihood project------------------- 54

Table 5g : Pump Boat Service (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project ------------- 55

Table 5h : Copra Trading (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ---------------------- 56

Table 5i : Palay Trading (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ----------------------- 57

Table 5j : Commodity (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ------------------------- 58

Table 5k : Micro Lending (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ---------------------- 59

Table 5l : Xerox Machine Livelihood Project--------------------------------- 60

Table 5m : Hog Raising Livelihood Project------------------------------------ 61

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report------------------------------------------ 62

Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity ----------------------------------- 63

Table 8 : Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity---------------- 64

Table 9a : Cost Estimate for Agro forestry Per Activity-------------------- 65

Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity--------------- 66

Table 9c : Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity---------------- 67

Table 9d : Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation/Forestation Per Activity---- 68

Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity----------- 69

Table 11 : Infrastructure Project---------------------------------------------- 70

Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan------------------------------------ 71

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Structure --------------------------------------------- 75

1a. SMP Contractor

1b1-1b2 CO Contractor

1c1-1c2 PO

1d1-1d3 M & E

1e. SUSIMO

1f. Infra

2. Pictures --------------------------------------------------------------------- 85

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------------------------------------------------- 87

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP)

revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government

when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.

Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of

contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the

implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main

strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary

communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming

them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop

watershed sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened

their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation

of these subprojects.

The Catubig Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the

province of Northern Samar covering the municipalities of Catubig and Las

Navas. It is a part of the large Catubig Watershed which supplies water to the

major rice growing towns of the province.

The intensive awareness and technical trainings of the members of the

Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed Area Inc.( CAPWA) and

the Hinaga River Environmental Development of Residents Association Inc.

(HIREDERA), the People’s Organizations contracted to do the Comprehensive

Site Development (CSD), equipped them with skills to accomplish much for the

Subproject. One indication of the strong commitment of the PO members was

the establishment of 2,321 hectares of good quality plantations with 92.30%

survival rate. The POs were able to acquire assets, to embark on capital buildup

and to save community forestry development fund amounting to more than six

million pesos.

In terms of employment, a total of 263,140 man days were generated out

of the CSD activities and implementation of the infrastructure projects. As for

manpower, 1,020 members of the POs were employed by the Subproject

increasing their annual average household income by 46.44 % for CAPWA and

70.59% for HIREDERA. The annual average household income of CAPWA

members increased from PHP 36,894 during the time of appraisal to PHP 54,027

during project implementation while those of HIREDERA members increased

from PHP 30,471 before the project to PHP 51,979.72 during the project.

With these, changes in the quality of life such as improvement of houses,

purchase of household appliances, sending of children to school were noted.

The 4.81 kilometers concrete pathway on the other hand eased the

mobility of the community members in the transport and marketing of products.

ii

More importantly, the individual stakeholders through heightened

understanding and developed capabilities have zealously accepted the

responsibility to undertake the maintenance and protection of their plantations

thus paving the way for the sustainable development of the watershed.

1

SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

OF

CATUBIG WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT

Loan Agreement No. PH-P135

Forestry Sector Project

I. Subproject Description

The subproject area is located in Northern Samar covering two

municipalities namely: Catubig and Las Navas. There are 18 outlying

barangays covered by the watershed subproject within the two municipalities

in the northern and northeastern frontiers of both towns. Catubig is

approximately 354 km from Tacloban City while Las Navas is 361 kilometers

passing via the San Isidro Catarman route.

It is part of the large Catubig

Watershed, which supplies water to

the major rice-growing towns of the

province. The site has 15 creeks that

drain into Catubig River just below

the watershed area.

Specifically, the project site is

located within the longitude 125° 02’

19.56” and 124° 55' 19.50” and latitude 12° 17’ 41.37” and 12° 24 '46.03”.

1. Purpose/Objectives

A. Original (at the time of appraisal)

Generally, the objective of the Subproject is to rehabilitate an area

of 2,427.70 hectares within the Catubig Watershed through

community based forest management approach involving

reforestation, agro forestry and alternative livelihood activities.

Specifically, the project aims:

a. To establish and maintain adequate forest cover within the

2,427.70 hectares of land such as forest tree plantation (1,002.62

hectares), agroforestry (637.04 hectares), and bamboo (54.20

hectares) and rattan plantation in existing secondary forest;

2

b. To develop and harness the capabilities and potentials of the

communities in various aspect of resource management for

effective implementation of the subproject on a sustainable basis;

c. To provide employment opportunities and livelihood activities in

the communities;

d. To establish appropriate soil and water conservation measures

along erosion prone areas;

e. To enhance bio-diversity and restore wildlife habitat; and

f. To develop eco-tourism potentials of the area.

B. Modification

a. Modified purpose/objectives

The objective of the Subproject is to rehabilitate an area of

2,321 hectares within the Catubig Watershed through community

based forest management

approach involving

reforestation (1,152.62

hectares), agro forestry

(637.04 hectares), rattan

(477.14 hectares), bamboo

(54.20 hectares) and

alternative livelihood

activities.

b. Reasons for the modification

During the initial implementation of the FSP, the total budget for

comprehensive site development based on the appraisal report was

recomputed and found out to be less than the total CSD

requirement. Subsequently, corresponding adjustments of CSD

budget of the Subproject scope was made taking into

consideration different factors such as availability of CSD areas.

The amount allocated for the rehabilitation of the Subproject was

enough to develop 2,171 hectares instead of the original 2,427.70

hectares.

However, during the actual implementation of the Subproject, the

performance of the PO was rated satisfactory that qualified them

3

to avail of the expansion area of 150 hectares, which was available

at the Las Navas side. This resulted to the increase in actual area

for development from 2,171 to 2,321 hectares.

The distribution of target area for the CSD component was

revised to offset the costing of reforestation components, which

was higher based on the revised guidelines on cost estimates.

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions

A.1 Please check: There has been ( revision and/or modification

or no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject

scope and dimensions.

A.2 If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.

Item

Original Scope

and Dimension (At

the time of

appraisal/Planned)

Revised/Modified

(Actual)

1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED

/ CBFM

A. SMP

B. CO 1

Year 1

Year 2

C. CSD

1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL/

SWC

4,000 ha.

December 1995 –

March 1996

Sept. 1997- Sept.

1999

2,171 ha.

IEC activities

Awakening

Empowerment

Empowerment

Institutionalizat

ion

4,000 ha.

December 1995 –

March 1996

Sept. 1997 – Sept

2000

2,171 ha.

IEC activities

Awakening

Empowerment

Empowerment

Institutionalizati

on

4

a. Infrastructure

b. Trail and Footpath

2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2

a. Agroforestry

b. Assisted Natural

Regeneration

c. Enrichment Planting

d. Tree Plantation

d.1 Bamboo

d.2 Rattan

d.3 Mangrove

d.4 Plantation Species

e. Timber Stand

Improvement

Total

3. INVENTORY RESIDUAL

FOREST

4. INCOME ENHANCEMENT

PROJECT

5. INFRASTRUCTURE

D. INFRASTRUCTURE

COMPONENT

Concrete pathway

RCDG bridge

Bailey bridge

E. MONITORING AND

EVALUATION

334.50 ha.

29.65 ha.

1,806.85 ha.

2,171 ha.

2 bunkhouses

5 lookout

towers

50 km graded

trail and foot-

path

637.04 ha.

54.20 ha.

477.14 ha.

1,152.62 ha.

2,321 ha.

2 PO offices

7 bunkhouses

10 lookout

towers

52 km graded

trail and foot-

path

4.81 km

1 unit

2 units

2,171 ha.

Nov. 2001 to

March 2003

Physical Validation

Verification of

5

2. SUSIMO

Equipment provided to the

office 3

boundaries,

monument/

markers, mapping

of established

areas/ plantation

perimeter

Seeding

production

inventory

Survival

inventory

Height and

diameter

measurement and

assessment of

overall quality

plantation

Inspection of

physical

infrastructure

Institutional and

Project Benefit

Assessment

Preparatory

activities/

orientation

Primary data

collection and

preliminary

assessment

Multi-level FGDs;

PO Federation,

LGUs,

Communities, AO,

SUSIMO

Documentation

Report

Preparation

1 Kia truck

1 Delica van

6

Research conducted

Trainings 4

2 motorcycles

1 power

generator

1 set computer

w/ UPS and

printer

1 GIS maptitude

2 units GPS

4 units hand held

radio

1 base radio

2 units Foresters

transit

1 manual

typewriter

4 units Brunton

compass

1 pc steel nylon

tape

2 pcs. diameter

tape

1 planimeter

rain gauge

1 lettering set

4 steel cabinets

1 unit camera

NONE

Follow on training

on community

organizing

Echo training on

field data

collection

National Site

Coordinators’

Conference

Orientation

Workshop for

SUSIMO staff

Orientation

Seminar for FSP

7

Others

FSP Assessment

and Planning

Workshop

FSP Phase-

out/Phase-in

Planning

Workshop

Training on Pili

Propagation and

Nursery

Management

OJT in Forest

Surveying

OJT in Improved

Coffee Plantation

Establishment

Update on Agro

Plantation and

Assessment of

Livelihood

Projects

Integrated Pest

Management

Enhanced Forest

Management

Through GPS and

GIS

OJT in GPS/GIS

Operation

Training on

Livelihood

Monitoring and

Supervision

Financial

Management

Training

Training on

Survey

Registration of

Protected Area

Occupancy

Subproject

Management

8

Office made of

concrete

materials

11 SUSIMO

staff

Cross visit to

Subproject sites

in Regions 4, 5, 6

and 7 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs 2Table 2 details the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of Scope and Dimensions

B.1 Where there has been “revision/modification” of the

Subproject scope and dimensions.

Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check

Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan,

etc.)

Revision of the supply and demand estimate

Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost

Substantial revision of the design due to the unforeseeable

physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor

soil condition, etc)

Natural disaster/unreasonable weather

Unreasonable circumstance beyond the control of the

Executing

Structural and organizational problems of the agencies

concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with

other agencies, etc.)

Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency,

fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problem

Procurement problems

Performance of contractor/supplier

Performance of consultant

Change in construction period

Others (PO initiative)

B.2. Detailed statement of reasons

9

On CSD

Large fluctuation in the Subproject Cost

For the CSD, about P31.4 million was initially released to the

region to facilitate the preparation of the Subproject’s work

and financial plan. The said amount is less than the actual

requirement of the Subproject based on the appraisal. The

cost has been affected also by the issuance of DENR

Memorandum Circular No. 2001-19 which provides for the

updating of cost of reforestation under the Forestry Sector

Project.

Considering that the cost per hectare of reforestation

component (tree plantation) was so high, it was impossible to

accomplish all the targets for the said component as it would

sacrifice all other components such as agro forestry and

bamboo. In view of this, corresponding reduction in the scope

of reforestation was made and subsequently increased the

targets for bamboo and agroforestry.

Substantial revision of the design due to the unforeseeable

physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor

soil condition, etc)

During the initial implementation of agroforestry component,

there was a significant mortality of Black Pepper, Mango and

Mangium due to their inappropriateness to the area. The

SUSIMO therefore recommended that the species be

replaced with Banana, Jackfruit, Toog, Abaca and Narra.

They took into consideration the

type of the area which is climatic

type II and adequately stocked with

coconut wherein fruiting of Mango

and growth of Mangium are largely

affected. Thus, the design of Agro

forestry Component was modified

that resulted to successful

implementation of the component.

In the case of changes in the

number of CSD infrastructures

wherein seven bunkhouses and 10 lookout towers were

constructed instead of two and five respectively, the

number of distant barangays and the need for effective

10

monitoring have been taken into consideration. Nursery sites

had to be constructed in every barangay hence they found it

more useful to construct bunkhouses in each of these

barangay.

The graded trails and footpath also exceeded the target

because of the scattered location of the plantations. The

trails and footpath were also in patches and connecting each

of them resulted to the increase in their total length.

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problem

During the implementation of Subproject, it was also

disclosed that part of the area intended for forest trees

plantation development was not suitable for the component

due to existing secondary vegetation. The said area was

instead developed as rattan plantation. Establishment of

rattan plantation was not part of the original plan for

development.

Considering also that the area intended for forest trees

plantation was planted with coconut, part of the area was

instead developed as agroforestry plantation.

Due to these problems, there was a considerable decrease in

the area for forest trees plantation which subsequently

increased the targets and accomplishment for agro forestry

and rattan.

Procurement problems

Because of the fast tracking of CSD activities, the PO was

forced to procure seedlings and suckers from Mindanao to be

used for agroforestry plantation. The PO suffered financial

and technical problems because of high mortality of

seedlings due to poor handling and acclimatization of

seedlings.

This problem prompted the PO to source out planting

materials within the province using locally adaptable species

of good economic values. The PO was able to catch up with

the backlogs and in fact accomplished more than their target

for agro forestry component.

11


concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with

other agencies, etc.)

During the initial stage of Subproject implementation,

monitoring of Subproject progress was handled by Site

Coordinators (2 for Catubig) who were mainly responsible for

monthly report preparation. They also addressed all concerns

pertaining to Subproject implementation.

Validation of Subproject accomplishments was being done by

the CENRO Inspection Committee (CIC) every time a request

for payment was made by the PO. However, considering that

the CICs were based in CENR offices and that members

handled multiple functions, delayed payments of

accomplishments has always been the problem of the

stakeholders.

The DENR, in conformity with the conditions agreed

between the DENR and JBIC during the project extension,

created a Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO) to

address concerns and issues requiring immediate attention at

the project site. The SUSIMO not only facilitated the

release of payment of the subproject implementers but also

the smooth implementation of the subproject because of

their presence in the field.

Others (Initiatives of the POs)

The excess accomplishments on agro forestry, and bamboo,

and the establishment of rattan plantation can be partly

attributed to the initiatives of the PO to establish more

areas knowing of the benefits that can be derived from the

Subproject.

Despite the reduction in some portion of the intended

reforestation plantation, an expansion area of 150 hectares

was approved for HIREDERA (PO in Las Navas side) for their

initiative to plant more areas and for satisfactorily meeting

the standard survival rate for plantation at 80%.

C. Contribution of the Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

c.1 (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs

12

Electric power and gas Telecommunication Social Services

(Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunication Water Supply

Power plants Broadcasting Sewerage

Transmission lines Education

Distribution system Irrigation and Flood Control Health

Gas Irrigation Tourism

Others Flood control Others

Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Roads Agriculture and Forestry

Bridges Fisheries

Railways

Airport Mining and Manufacturing

Ports Mining

Marine transportation Manufacturing

C.2 Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description

1. Environmental considerations

2. Socio-institutional consideration

With the project, appropriate

land use and management would

be applied, which would improve

and sustain land production; soil

erosion rate would be reduced by

approximately 66.12%.; water

quality and quantity of Catubig

River would be improved, which

would mean increased fish catch

in the River and downstream

coastal areas; the restored

vegetation will provide habitat to

diversified wildlife in the

surroundings; flooding of

farmlands and communities as

well as the downstream would be

minimized; increased irrigated

rice fields within the impact area

would result to sustain the

serviceability of water dependent

projects.

Based on the survey conducted,

majority of the respondents

were willing to participate in the

Subproject, both on a full-time

13

3. Economic Benefits

4. Site Development and Other

Intangible Benefits

and part-time basis.

There was sufficient labor force

in the communities. A total of

5,081 individuals comprising

57.4% of the total population

belong to the existing workforce.

Of the total population of 8,853

in 1,446 households, 1,020

members were directly available

for Subproject implementation.

These people shall be trained on

both the social and technical

aspects of forest/community

resources management to further

enhance their knowledge and

skills. The participation of women

as partners in the improvement

of the social and economic

condition of the household and

the community as a whole will be

recognized.

Strong linkages with the relevant

agencies will be forged to ensure

sustainability of program and

projects.

It is expected that the

Subproject would generate

additional income for the

households especially during the

critical period, the first five

years of implementation where a

lot of inputs are expected from

the communities.

The project is expected to raise

the income from P41,205 to

approximately P79,829 for a 26-

year implementation period

It is expected that the

Subproject would provide other

economic benefits or direct

14

intangible benefits to the

community and the country as a

whole. The increase in the

quantity and quality of water

yield due to improved vegetation

and hydrologic cycle is expected

to benefit the lake and coastal

systems; improve sustainability

of water-dependent livelihood

systems; decrease soil erosion,

and improve biodiversity. This will

also benefit the proposed 22 MW

Hydropower Plant, which will be

dependent on sustained water

production from the watershed.

The stumpage build-up is

sustained for the duration of

Subproject implementation, a

total of 1.1 million cu m of wood

from forest and agro forest

trees is feasible. This wood stock

and the improved forest

conditions created by the

Subproject offers tremendous

opportunities in the future both

for reserved stock resource and

for eco-tourism purposes.

C.3 Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description

1. Improved awareness level of the

community on natural resource

policies, environmental issues and

benefits to be derived from the

forests

2. Strengthened POs with installed

Results of the interview of the

105 respondents showed high

level of environmental awareness

despite the low educational

attainment and their remote

location from the sectors who

could provide information. This

awareness level can translate to

effective and sustainable

management of forest resources.

97% completion of the PO

15

policies and mechanisms in

managing a project

3. Increased Subproject

participants’ annual income and

acquisition of assets

milestones per SUSIMO’s in-

house assessment was recorded.

The existing organizational

practices, linkages with other

sector to enhance their skills and

knowledge and increasing

participation of the community

manifested organizational and

social development of the PO.

These capabilities of the POs are

expected to make the community

more competent in managing the

organization and community

resources.

There was an increase in

Subproject participants’ annual

income by 46.44% in CAPWA and

70.59% in HIREDERA. The

increase is attributed largely to

the CSD activities and initial

livelihood projects5 implemented

by the POs.

The two POs of the Subproject

(CAPWA and HIREDERA)

acquired assets, collected capital

build-up (CBU), saved community

forestry development fund

(CFDF) and generated income

from the initial livelihood

activities amounting to more

than six million pesos.

The increased income and assets

are expected to improve the

economic condition and living

standard of the PO members.

These would also make way for

the PO to do social services by

way of donating for the schools,

churches, and other entities

within the community. The POs

have already donated P26,000 to

16

4. Comprehensive and healthy CSD

plantations

5. Completed infrastructures within

the subproject area.

Brgy. Bukid in Las Navas for the

concreting of electric

transmission posts, P20,000 for

repair of elementary school

building in the remote barangay –

Brgy. Victory in Las Navas and

P46,600 for the improvement of

Catubig Church and Barangay

Chapels.

A total area of 2,321 hectares

consisting of 637.04 hectares of

agroforestry, 1,152.62 hectares

reforestation, 54.20 hectares

bamboo and 477.14 hectares

rattan plantation exists in

subproject. Based on the latest

M & E report, the said

plantations generated a weighted

average survival rate of 92.30%.

The presence of these

vegetative covers will ensure a

healthy environment and

improved bio-diversity.

4.81 kilometers concrete

pathway with one RCDG bridge,

two bailey bridges and box

culverts. These infrastructure

projects are expected to

facilitate mobility of the

community members, transport

and marketing of products that

would eventually lead to the

improvement of the living

standard of the local community. 5 Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood projects being implemented by the POs

17

II. Subproject Implementation

Organization for Implementing Subproject

Function on the

Subproject

Implementation

Name of Organization Reasons for

Change (1) Original (2) Changed

1. SMP Contractor

2. AO for CO

3. Assisting

Professional

4. PO

Visayas Assn

for Livelihood

and Upliftment

of the

Ecological

Systems, Inc.

(VALUES)

Samar Center

for Rural

Education and

Development

(SACRED) – for

CAPWA

Bankaton D’

Salvacion Found.,

Inc. – for

HERIDERA

Geoffrey O.

Saong – for

CAPWA

Gregorio O.

Sarmiento – for

HERIDERA

Catubig Assn for

the Protection

of Watershed

Area (CAPWA),

Inc.

Hinaga River

Environmental

Development of

Residents Assn

(HIREDERA),

Inc.

Gregorio O.

Sarmiento – for

CAPWA and

HERIDERA

AP Saong

resigned

18

5. M & E

Contractor

6. Infrastructure

Contractor

Taft People’s

Economic Council

Multi-Purpose

Development,

Inc. (TPEC-

MPDAI) – for

physical and

institutional and

project benefit

assessment for

Catubig

Maslog Forest

Resource

Development

Association

(MASLOG), Inc.

– for physical

and institutional

and project

benefit

assessment for

Las Navas

B. Vicencio Const-

ruction

TPEC-MPDAI –

for physical

validation for

Catubig

MASLOG, Inc. –

for physical

validation for

Las Navas

DEVELOPERS –

for institutional

and project

benefit

assessment for

Catubig and Las

Navas

Issuance of new

guidelines for M

& E contracting

1.1 Reasons for the change

Change in AP – Mr. Saong resigned as AP for HIREDERA in

consideration of his job application to other agency. AP Sarmiento

replaced him, in concurrent capacity as AP for CAPWA.

Change in M & E contractor – the Department issued a new M & E

guidelines which provide, among others that physical validation

and institutional and project benefit assessment be conducted by

19

different NGO. To this effect, the existing M & E contractors

for both CAPWA and HIREDERA were retained for physical

validation and another NGO was hired to conduct the institutional

and project benefit assessment of both Pos.

1.2 Problem arising, counter measures adopted and results

Problem Counter Measure Results

1. Frequent change of

CO personnel

composition

Fragmented activities

occurred due to

frequent change of

CO personnel

assigned in the area.

The causes of change

were either

termination

(considering that

some personnel

particularly those

assigned in Las Navas,

were neophytes or

fresh graduates and

had no ample

experiences on CO) or

resignation.

2. AO operation was

affected by the fast

tracking of CSD

activities and failed

to accomplish the

targets on time

3. Intervention of armed

men in the

implementation of CO

activities, which

resulted to the

delayed payment of

AO’s billings.

Usual disagreements

between DENR and AO

staff compelled the

contractor to hire

additional field staff

with expertise on

community organizing.

The AO adjusted their

targets to suit with the

PO activities. On-the-

job trainings for PO

members were

conducted and contract

of AO was extended.

Some awakening

activities were

conducted at the PO

field office in Poblacion

to avoid resistance

against the CO

personnel at the

All targets were

completed by the AO but

the contract had to be

extended for one year.

All targets were

completed before the

extension expired.

The target number of

members to benefit

from the IEC campaign

was not met on time,

thus delaying the

payment of AO

accomplishments.

20

4. Change of PO

leadership

Both POs were

relatively competent

in performing their

tasks but for

HERIDERA, there

was a need to enhance

the management skills

of the elected

officers because

pressures from

outside circle still

affected them easily.

During the outset of

leadership of the new

PO president, there

were also factions or

organization bloc

within.

5. Problems of PO on

the maintenance and

protection activities

for the last six

months of subproject

implementation.

There was a

mandatory reduction

of the budget for

CSD due to the

cancellation of

portion of loan

proceeds of the FSP.

This resulted to the

barangays.

Additional Site

Coordinators were also

deployed to facilitate

completion of

subproject activities

A series of meeting was

facilitated by the

SUSIMO among PO

staff and officers.

They were advised to

remain calm and refuse

intervention made by

influential people, which

are not advantageous to

the interest of the

association. The new set

of officers were also

advised to consult with

concerned PO members

and SUSIMO before

any major decision was

made.

The responsibility in

the protection and

maintenance of

plantations was shared

with the individual

stakeholders by

adopting the Household

Land Development

Management (HLDMU)

approach. This approach

was also supported with

a Memorandum of

Understanding (MOU)

between the PO

Management and

The attitude of the

newly elected PO

president and officers

relatively improved and

the subproject was

smoothly implemented.

The maintenance and

protection activities

were accepted and

shouldered by the

stakeholders during the

period and onward, which

sustained the condition

of the established

plantations.

21

shortage of allocation

for maintenance and

protection of the

plantation during the

revision of the work

and financial plan

6. The PO also

experienced problem

on area to be

developed considering

that the selected site

was not suitable for

reforestation. This

was aggravated by

the problems on

species-site matching.

7. Shortage of planting

materials.

The PO encountered

significant mortality

on seedlings procured

for agro forestry

plantation, because of

inappropriateness to

areas adequately

stocked with coconut

8. Intervention of

armed group in the

implementation of

infrastructure

project.

Allegedly, the armed

group was demanding

a 10% revolutionary

fee, which the

contractor refused to

give thus delaying the

implementation of the

project.

individual stakeholder.

The PO considered

change of location but no

area is available. They

also replaced Mahogany

seedlings with Toog.

The PO was advised by

the SUSIMO to modify

the planting design and

change species with

locally adaptable

planting materials.

The Contractor’s

Engineer made constant

negotiation with the

hostile group while the

SUSIMO obtained the

support of the

residents of the

affected barangays to

facilitate the

implementation of the

infrastructure projects.

This resulted to the

reduction in the scope of

reforestation component.

But the growth of the

seedlings improved after

it was replaced by

suitable species.

The area shortfall was

recovered and the

plantation survival rate

was improved.

The local community

came up with a resolution

requesting the DENR and

JBIC to extend the

contract of the civil work

contractor and proposed

to petition the armed

group through signature

campaign for the latter

to refrain from

intervening with the

Project.

The Project was

22

completed during the

extension period.

1.3 The latest organizational chart (or equivalent) for implementation of

the Subproject is ( attached or not attached)

The Organizational Charts of VALUES, BANKATON, SACRED,

CAPWA, HIREDERA, TPEC-MPDAI, MASLOG, DEVELOPERS and B.

VICENCIO are attached as Annex 1a to Annex 1e, respectively.

1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please

state the reason.

N/A

Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

Item Original Schedule Actual Period

1. Contract NGO for

SMP

2. Contract of AO for

CO

3. Contract of PO for

CSD

4. Contract of NGO for

M & E

5. Contract of Infra

Component

Completion

(completion of

Subproject)

December 1995 –

March 1996

Sept. 1997 – Sept.

1999

Nov. 1997 – Nov.

2000

Nov. 2001 – June

2003

June 2002 – June

2003

November 2000

December 1995 –

March 1996

Sept. 1997 –Sept.

2000

Nov. 1997 – June

2003

Nov. 2001 – March

2003

June 2002 – July

2003

July 2003

Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report

23

Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion

ceremony or final disbursement or other than the above –

completion of all subproject activities)

The completion date was scheduled for November 2000 (at the

time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion

B.1 In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s)

from the following list and check.

Change in scope/dimension

Natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake,

typhoon, etc.)

Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate

Problems in procurement

Inflation

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing

Agency


concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other

agencies, etc.)

Legislative matters

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems

Performance of contractor/supplier

Performance of consultant

Others (deadlines set for the completion of subproject

activities)

B.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion

Change in scope and dimension (on CSD)

This is particularly true to CSD implementation. The original

schedule was based on the projected completion of the original

scope of the Subproject. However, with the approval of

additional FSP activities wherein an expansion area of 150

hectares was included, corresponding extension of

implementation schedule was made.

The expansion area was implemented during the extension

period. On the other hand, maintenance activities of the original

area during the extension period were also approved along with

other Subproject activities.

24

Natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake,

typhoon, etc.) and Unusual circumstance beyond the control of

Executing Agency (on Infrastructure and CO)

The unfavorable weather condition and the intervention of

armed group in Las Navas area caused the delayed

implementation of infrastructure projects. Allegedly, certain

armed group was demanding 10% of the total contract cost as

revolutionary fee. The contractor’s engineer negotiated with this

group from time to time while the SUSIMO obtained support of

the residents to facilitate the implementation of the

infrastructure projects. Through a resolution passed by the local

community, an extension was granted to the infrastructure

contractor.

The intervention of armed men greatly affected also the

implementation of CO activities. Some awakening activities were

conducted in the PO field office in Poblacion to avoid resistance

against the CO personnel at the barangays.

Procurement problems (on CSD)

Procurement of seedlings, particularly for agro forestry area

caused delay in the completion of CSD targets. Pineapple suckers

and coffee seeds/seedlings were procured from Mindanao.

However, problems regarding poor handling and improper

treatment resulted to high mortality which prompted the PO to

change species and procure again seedlings from others sources.

Performance of the contractor (on CO)

Frequent changes of CO field personnel resulted to loss of

focus and resulted to fragmented CO activities, thus the target

completion was not met and required the extension of the

contract duration.

Others (deadlines set for the completion of subproject

activities – on M & E)

The contract for M & E was originally set to be completed by

June 2003. However, considering the deadline set to complete

all Subproject activities in the same period, the contractor

facilitated the early completion of the activity by deploying 40

25

enumerators. They were able to complete the M & E earlier by

March 2003.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay

On CSD – An extension of the contract duration was granted to

the POs to be able to complete the activities.

On Infrastructure – Negotiation with the armed-group was made

by the contractor to facilitate the implementation of

infrastructure projects. Subsequently, an extension of contract

duration was granted by the DENR to the contractor.

On CO – Extension of contract duration was also granted.

On M & E – The contractor deployed 40 enumerators to facilitate

early completion of activities..

Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual expenditure (by

Component)

Item

Original Cost

(based on

appraisal in M

pesos

Actual

Expenditures (in

M pesos)

1. Survey, mapping and

planning

2. Community Organizing

3. Comprehensive Site

Development

4. Monitoring and Evaluation

5. Infrastructure

Development

6. Subproject Coordinating

Office

2.430000

3.832600

31.421187

6.133812

15.987981

2.187639

2.430000

3.907800

46.302740

4.737853

17.647468

2.187639

Total 61.993219 77.213500 Please refer to Tables 7, 8, 9a-d, and 10 for the details on cost of SMP, CO, CSD and

M & E.

List of Infrastructure projects with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table

11.

26

B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual

Expenditure

B.1. If there is any difference between Column 2 and Column 3 in the

above Table, please choose the reason(s) from the following lists

and check

Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural

disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)

Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period

Increase or decrease arising from inflation

Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange

rate

Increase or decrease arising from a change in scope/work volume

of the Subproject

Decrease arising from keen competition in tender

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing

Agency

Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems

Others

B.2 Description of the detailed reason(s) and background

Increase or decrease arising from a change in scope/work volume of

the Subproject

On CSD - The approval of the expansion area caused the increase

in the cost of CSD. The updating of cost pursuant to the

guidelines issued by the Department, which provide for the

increase in the unit cost

On Infrastructure – In view of the changes on specifications and

design of the planned infrastructure, variation orders were

approved for the project, thus increasing the actual expenditure

for the component.

On M & E - The decrease in the actual expenditure for M & E was

attributed to the revision of guidelines for activity wherein

physical validation and institutional and project benefit

assessment were to be contracted separately at a lower cost.

Unrealistic cost estimate/Technical problem

On CO - During the initial stage of CO implementation, the region

considered only the first year target for CSD as basis for CO

27

costing. Later on, the cost was adjusted to consider the whole

area of the subproject hence the increase in expenditure.

Action Taken in case of Cost Overrun and Results

On CSD and CO – Necessary amendment of contracts were made

to accommodate additional cost requirement for the activities.

On Infrastructure - Variation orders were recommended by the

Site Engineer and subsequently approved by the Project.

Corresponding allocation was provided to the region to

accommodate these variation orders.

D. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by

Year)

Calendar Year Original Cost Actual Expenditure

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2.430000

1.124867

17.634761

10.213799

6.421359

2.020112

6.804581

15.343740

2.430000

-

5.098796

8.658707

13.538276

9.731496

19.209168

18.547057

Total 61.993219 77.213500 Please refer to Table 12 for the details of the Annual Work and Financial Plan.

Comments on the Performance of SMP Contractor, Assisting

Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), People’s

Organizations (POs), M & E and Infrastructure Contractors

A. Performance of Performance of SMP Contractor, Assisting

Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), People’s

Organizations (POs), M & E and Infrastructure Contractors

28

A.1. Overall performance Design

Contract administration Contract supervision

Expertise Staff qualification

Coordinating ability Compliance to Contracts

Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope,

if any

Others

A.2 Description (in detail)

SMP Contractor

The contractor employed GIS experts, had enough equipment

and satisfactorily accomplished the activities on time.

Assisting Organization

Most of the AO personnel were fresh graduates and did not

have enough exposure to community organizing. On the other

hand, staff with experience/expertise did not spend enough

time on the field but instead focused on data consolidation and

analysis.

Assisting Professionals

Performance of AP was excellent. He executed his terms of

reference according to schedule.

People’s Organization

Most of the Board of Directors have low educational attainment

and still dependent on SUSIMO on policy and matters requiring

major decisions.

M & E Contractor

Generally, the M & E contracts were completed ahead of

contract expiration even though an extension was granted to the

contractor for physical validation at the Las Navas side due to

the intervention of hostile groups and the scattered location of

plantations.

29

Infrastructure Contractor

They have good community relations and

coordinating ability with other agencies.

However, their activities particularly in

Las Navas were accomplished rather

slowly because of the intervention of

the hostile group.

Other Matter relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any

comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and

results in (B) below.

A. Technical Financial Institutional

Economic Social/Distributional Others

B. Description (in detail)

Absence of technical assistance during the initial stage of

Subproject implementation to respond to the requirements of

daily subproject activities. Technical assistance was necessary

considering that only one full time Site Coordinator was

assigned to the Subproject.

Manuals to reinforce the technical know-how of the field

personnel also came late.

Gradual phasing-out of SUSIMO from the Subproject is

necessary to make the PO self-sufficient in discharging their

responsibilities as CBFMA holder.

III. Actions Taken by the SMP Contractor, AOs, APs and POs relating to

Recommendation(s)

Recommendation(s) made by the SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations

are given hereunder or not applicable. There has been no

recommendation with regard to the Subproject).

30

Action Taken and Results

Recommendation Action Taken and Results

1. The Site Coordinator

recommended that AO

hire/augment their technical staff

that undertake CO activities.

2. Due to the intervention of armed

groups, the newly elected

President and officers of

HERIDERA failed to manage

effectively the organization. This

resulted in the emergence of

factions within the PO. The

SUSIMO advised that they should

remain calm and refuse

intervention, as it would affect

the implementation of the

Subproject.

3. On the shortage of planting

materials, the PO was advised by

the SUSIMO to modify the

planting design and change species

with locally adaptable planting

materials.

1. The AO hired capable staff and

ensured full coordination with

the Site Coordinator in the

delivery of their services.

Although the contract was

extended, the activities were

completed by the AO even

before it expired.

2. The concerned PO adhered to

the said recommendation and

closely coordinated with the

SUSIMO on every action and

decision relative to Subproject

implementation. The officers and

members of the PO gained

support of the whole

organization and successfully

implemented the Subproject to

the extent that it was able to

avail of expansion area.

3. This is particularly true to Agro

forestry component of the

Subproject whereby pineapple

suckers and other species were

procured from Mindanao but high

mortality was experienced. The

PO instead used locally available

species of good economic value

and adopted the HLDMU

approach. As a result, they were

able to catch up and accomplish

more than the target.

31

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities

Present Condition of Facilities

A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or not

applicable. No particular problem has occurred since initial operation

started). If there have been any problem, please check the relevant

space in the Table.

For the SUSIMO

Item Status Initial

Operation

Mainte-

nance

Manage-

ment Others

1. SUSIMO

Office

2. Computer

3. Power

Generator

4. Zip drive

5. Brunton

compass

6. Grass cutter

7. Kia Truck

8. Motorcycle

9. Motorboat

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Non-

serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

For the PO

Item Status Initial

Operation

Mainte-

nance

Manage-

ment Others

1. PO Office

2. Warehouse

3. Motorcycle

4. Computer

5. 6-wheeler truck

6. Xerox Machine

7. Plow

8. Video camera

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Non-

serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

B. Please check: The problem(s) has arisen owing to the following

reason(s).

32

Technical Financial Institutional

Economic Social/distributional Others

C. Description (in detail)

For the SUSIMO

Initial Operation of facilities

The computer Zip Drive was not functional during its initial operation.

It was brought to Tacloban for major repair.

Maintenance of facilities

The frequent and erratic power interruption in the Subproject site

caused usual computer system failure. This was aggravated by the

lack of computer technician in the locality. On the other hand, the

problem regarding Brunton Compass resulted to the rigidity of the

parcellary surveys of CSD accomplishments.

Moreover, securing the spare part of the grass cutter had been a

problem also of the SUSIMO in the maintenance of said equipment.

Management of facilities

The Brunton Compass of the SUSIMO was being lent to the PO field

personnel to augment their equipment. However, there were times

when the equipment was not properly taken care of.

For the PO

Maintenance of facilities

The problem in maintenance of the computer system was the lack of

experienced technician in the locality.

Heavy mud build-up along Catubig-Las Navas municipal road during wet

season largely affected the maintenance of the HIREDERA’s 6-

wheeler truck especially when hauling farm products.

The major cause in the breakdown of CAPWA’s Xerox machine was

the operator’s limited experience in its operation. Further, the

successive replacement of its spare parts was a big drain on the

budget of the PO. They plan to auction it to recover some of the

losses.

33

Management

In spite of the existing policy on the use of equipment for both POs,

the use of their motorcycles and plow were poorly monitored by the

associations causing them to entail high maintenance cost.

D. Aspect of utilizing Subproject facilities

For the SUSIMO

Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1. SUSIMO Office

2. Computer

3. Power Generator

4. Zip drive

5. Brunton compass

6. Grass cutter

7. Kia Truck

8. Motorcycle

To be used by the

SUSIMO for the

Subproject-related

activities.

Used by the SUSIMO

for the Subproject-

related activities except

for two motorcycles,

which were found to be

more useful in the

PENRO for their

monitoring of the

Subproject.

For the PO

Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1. PO Office

2. Warehouse

3. Motorcycle

4. Computer/Zip Drive

5. 6-wheeler truck

6. Xerox Machine

7. Plow

8. Motorboat

9. Video camera

To be used by the PO for

Subproject-related

activities.

Used by the PO for

Subproject-related

activities.

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of PO

A.1. Please give the name of the SUSIMO and PO and/or Body in

charge of O/M

Administrative Support Unit (ASU) of SUSIMO Catubig

Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed Area

(CAPWA), Inc.

34

Hinaga River Environmental Development of Residents

Association (HIREDERA), Inc.

A.2. Please check: The latest organizational charts (or equivalent)

for O/M of the Subproject facilities is ( attached or not

available).

The Organizational Charts for the maintenance and operation of

PO facilities are attached Annex 1c1 and 1c2.

A.3. If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please

state the reason.

The Organizational Chart of SUSIMO is not necessary

considering that only one staff, the ASU head, was responsible

for the maintenance and operation of SUSIMO facilities.

B. Number of staff/workers of the SUSIMO and PO or Body for

Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

SUSIMO – one (1)

PO - two (2) for each PO

C. Please check and explain the following.

C.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or

insufficient).

If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum

number of staff and your plan for providing them

C.2. Average employment period of the present staff

SUSIMO - ten (10) years

PO - six (6) years

C.3. Availability of training program to promote vocational ability of

the staff, its contents and expected effects.

N/A

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance

(by Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

35

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar Year Maintenance Operation Total

CY 2000

CY 2001

CY 2002

CY 2003

SUSIMO Office

Computer/Zip Drive

Power Generator

Brunton compass

Grass cutter

Kia Truck

Motorcycle

Motorboat

0.097300

0.040000

0.100000

0.050000

0.290568

0.260000

0.463000

0.050000

0.387868

0.300000

0.563000

Total 0.237300 1.063568 1.300868

For the PO (Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar Year Maintenance Operation Total

CY 2000

CY 2001

CY 2002

CY 2003

PO Office

Warehouse

Motorcycle

Computer/Zip Drive

6-wheeler truck

Xerox Machine

Video camera

Motorboat

The PO did not

allot budget

for the

maintenance

and operation

of facilities

since the

budget was

provided as

the need

arose.

Total

36

B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar Year

Mainte-

ance Operation

Maintenance and

Operation (For

expanded portion)

Total

CY 2001

SUSIMO Office/

Computer/Generator

Truck/motorcycle

Sub-total

CY 2002

SUSIMO Office/

Computer/Generator

Truck/motorcycle

Sub-total

CY 2003

SUSIMO Office/

Computer/Generator

Truck/motorcycle

Sub-total

CY 2004

0.006603

0.006603

0.007000

0.003750

0.010750

0.008700

0.003143

0.011843

0.032528

0.032528

0.081389

0.032833

0.114222

0.034579

0.005000

0.039579

0.097620

0.097620

0.030000

0.052770

0.004344

0.057114

0.060000

0.032528

0.006603

0.039131

0.088389

0.036583

0.124972

0.193669

0.012487

0.206156

0.090000

Total 0.029196 0.186329 0.127620 0.117114 0.460259

For the PO (Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar Year

Mainte-

ance Operation

Maintenance and

Operation (For

expanded portion)

Total

CY 2001

PO Office

Warehouse

Motorcycle

Computer/Zip

Drive

0.026800

0.002900

0.002000

0.037100

0.026520

0.033800

0.063900

0.029420

0.035800

37

6-wheeler truck

Xerox Machine

Motorboat

Video camera

Sub-total

CY 2002

PO Office

Warehouse

Motorcycle

Computer/Zip

Drive

6-wheeler truck

Xerox Machine

Motorboat

Video camera

Sub-total

CY 2003

PO Office

Warehouse

Motorcycle

Computer/Zip

Drive

6-wheeler truck

Xerox Machine

Motorboat

Video camera

Sub-total

CY 2004

0.010500

0.042200

0.033465

0.003000

0.005820

0.009725

0.036500

0.088510

0.017000

0.009560

0.003600

0.002500

0.018000

0.012000

0.062660

0.015700

0.113120

0.071560

0.022700

0.037905

0.023800

0.035100

0.191065

0.022950

0.008500

0.029480

0.020780

0.016000

0.016000

0.001200

0.114910

0.054160

0.050000

0.050000

0.150710

0.026200

0.155320

0.105025

0.031520

0.047630

0.023800

0.071600

0.279575

0.039950

0.058500

0.039040

0.024380

0.018500

0.018000

0.028000

0.001200

0.227570

0.204870

Total 0.193370 0.419095 0.054160 0.200710 0.867335

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion,

replacement or any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing

plan for the same.

The basis for the maintenance and operation (for expanded portion)

was the actual expenditure by the SUSIMO after Subproject

38

completion and the projected mandatory expenses for electricity,

water and repair of Subproject facilities.

No projection was made by the PO considering that they allot budget

for facilities as the need arises.

4. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method

Monthly checks up of all the facilities were conducted to determine

their condition. Once a facility was found to be defective, it would be

brought immediately to the shop for repair or if only spare parts are

needed for the facility, they just bought the same and facilitated the

maintenance activities.

B. Frequency

Monthly for all major facilities.

C. Others, if any.

V. Benefits derived from the Subproject

Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article

by you.

Technology transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the

Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)

Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the

sector(s) after completion)

Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the

region/community

Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s)

and/or the region concerned

B. Please give the details for each of the item(s) you checked

Technology Transfer

Both POs were active in community development activities

implemented by other agencies within the municipalities of Catubig

and Las Navas. The president of CAPWA was elected vice president

of the Samar Island Biodiversity Foundation (SIBF), Northern Samar

39

Chapter in CY 2002, while the former president of HIREDERA was a

member of the Technical Working Group of the same Foundation for

the same year.

With the implementation of the Help Catubig Agricultural

Advancement Project (HCAAP) as assisted by the NIA and the LGU

of Northern Samar, the two POs have also been short-listed as

potential partners. Both POs have submitted their letter of intent to

manifest their interest in the said project.

With these involvements, the POs were able to share during meetings,

conferences and trainings, the experiences they have applied to the

Subproject.

Employment Creating

Both POs that implemented the subproject gave equal rights for

women, men and youth, member and non-members, in terms of

participation in Subproject activities.

Results of evaluation revealed that the project generated a total of

263,140 man days of employment of which 216,000 man days were

from the CSD activities and 47,060 man days from the

implementation of the infrastructure project.

Income-raising

Through the employment created by different subproject activities,

the annual income of PO members increased by 46.44% for CAPWA

and 70.59% for HIREDERA. This is equivalent to an increase from

P36,894 before the project to P54,027.14 during the project for

CAPWA and from P30,471.16 before the project to P51,979.72 during

the project for HIREDERA.

Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s)

and/or the region concerned

Before the project, timber poaching was rampant anywhere in Catubig

and Las Navas. The existence of the Subproject helped in making the

community aware of the value of the forest and wise utilization of its

resources and in harnessing their capability to protect it.

40

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations

The implementation of the first ever community-based forest

management project in the municipalities of Catubig and Las Navas

has significantly improved the living standard of the communities

The Subproject broadened their understanding on the importance

of watershed as a life-support system.

The issuance of Department Administrative Order No. 2000-65

and other enabling DENR policies under the FSP contributed

significantly to the improvement in the overall implementation of

the Subproject by making the involved community technically

capable in ensuring sustainability of forest management with

minimum intervention from the DENR.

The involvement of DENR personnel (SUSIMO) gained for these

people valuable experiences and lessons learned that is useful in

the implementation of similar projects in the future.

The recommended species and planting designs contained in the

appraisal report should be flexible enough vis-à-vis the suitability

of the species and appropriateness of the design with the

prevailing bio-physical condition of the subproject.

Key personnel of SUSIMO should be retained to assist the POs in

the continuing protection and management of the watershed and

CBFMA area. The POs are currently implementing livelihood

projects with substantial investment involved. To ensure that

business operations are effectively managed, technical advices and

guidance of the SUSIMO is necessary.

The SUSIMO in coordination with DENR-CENRO should facilitate

the formation and training of environment and natural resources

officers (ENROs) from among the PO members to sustainably

support the protection of watershed and the surrounding forest

areas.

Being the legitimate POs with proven track record in the area,

CAPWA and HIREDERA should be given preference in the

implementation of similar project in the future. They should also

be given the chance to be involved in projects such as the on-going

41

Help Catubig Agricultural Advancement Project (HCAAP), wherein

they have expressed their interest to participate.

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION (HIREDERA)

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing Implementation, Livelihood System Development and Comprehensive Site Development Activities

NFDO 1 June 2-6, 1998

2. Re-orientation of POs on the New Guidelines with Action Planning

NFDO 21 February 1-2, 2001

3. On-the-job Training on Forest Surveying

AP 11February 21-23,

20017. Pre-membership Training and

Orientation on CBFMSUSIMO-COSU 45

August 22-31, 2001

8. Pre-membership Training and Orientation on CBFM

SUSIMO-COSU 71September 13-26,

20019. Assessment Workshop on

Community-Based Forest Management

DENR Region 8 9 October 1-2, 2001

10. Update on Agroforestry Plantation and Assessment of Livelihood Project

NFDO 10December 3-7,

2001

11. Cross-vist and Year-end Assessment with Awarding of Outstanding Subproject Implementers in DENR Region 8

DENR Region 8 4December 18-21,

2001

12. Financial Management TrainingTESDA-Las Navas 11 14-Feb-02

13. FSP Re-orientation Course for SUSIMO

NFDO 2 March 6-8, 2002

14. RBAC Orientation Seminar for Infrastructure Support Component of Catubig Subproject

DENR Region 8 1 21-Mar-02

15. FSP Phase-out/Phase-in Planning Workshop

NFDO 4November 4-8,

200216. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman,

Northern Samar12 7-Feb-03

17. Training on Livelihood Implementation

SUSIMO 23 May 12-13, 2003

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

TRAINING

TRAINING

18. Training on Livelihood Monitoring and Supervision

NFDO 10 May 3-5, 2003

19. FSP Assessment and Planning Workshop

NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003

20. FSP-JBIC Packaging of Terminal and Subproject Completion Reports

DENR Region 8 4 July 15-19, 2003

21. Training on Pili Propagation and Nursery Management

DA-BIARC, San Agustin, Pili,

Camarines Sur2

December 10-14, 2003

TRAININGS ATTENDED BY PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION (CAPWA)

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing Implementation, Livelihood System Development and Comprehensive Site Development Activities

NFDO 1 June 2-6, 1998

2. Re-orientation of POs on the New Guidelines with Action Planning



AP 8February 21-23,

20014. On-the-job Training on

Improved Coffee Plantation Establishment

AP 20 March 7-8, 2001

5. On-the-job Training on GPS/GIS Operation

NFDO 2 June 3-6, 2001

6. Provincial Management Conference (MANCON)

PENRO Northern Samar

10 27-Jun-01


SUSIMO-COSU 45August 22-31,


Orientation on CBFM SUSIMO-COSU 42September 13-26,

20019. Abaca Production and

Mushroom CultureFIDA-Catarman 16 Sep-01

10. Assessment Workshop on Community-Based Forest Management

DENR Region 8 9 October 1-2, 2001

TRAINING

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES



2001



2001

13. FSP Re-orientation Course for SUSIMO

NFDO 2 March 6-8, 2002




NFDO 4November 4-8,

200216. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman,

Northern Samar12 7-Feb-03

17. Training on Livelihood Implementation

SUSIMO 23 May 12-13, 2003


NFDO 10 May 3-5, 2003


NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003

20. FSP-JBIC Packaging of Terminal and Subproject Completion Reports




Camarines Sur2


TRAINING


TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

CY 1998 Reforestation Narra 240.68 93.19 Mahogany 151.54 90.63 Toog 217.77 93.00

sub-total 609.99 92.49

Agroforestry Mango/Abaca 2.96 79.00 Cacao/Abaca/J.Fruit 51.84 83.81 Coffee/Abaca/J.Fruit 78.40 90.30

sub-total 133.20 87.52

Rattan Palasan & other spcs. 162.28 97.22 sub-total 162.28 97.22

Bamboo Bayog 1.75 80.00 sub-total 1.75 80.00

Total 907.22 92.58

CY 1999 Reforestation Narra 82.20 96.00 Mahogany 14.30 96.00

sub-total 96.50 96.00

Agroforestry Cacao/Abaca/J.Fruit 74.26 88.27 Coffee/Abaca/J.Fruit 101.21 91.22

sub-total 175.47 89.97


Bamboo Bayog 33.75 91.70 Kawayan Kiling 19.80 82.00

sub-total 53.55 85.32

Total 619.56 90.01

CY 2000 Reforestation Firebreak 21.19 94.00 Toog 154.00 98.00

sub-total 175.19 97.52

Agroforestry Abaca 44.40 94.00 sub-total 44.40 94.00

Total 219.59 96.81

Survival Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted


TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Survival Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted

CY 2001 Reforestation Toog 309.81 94.89 sub-total 309.81 94.89

Agroforestry J.Fruit/Narra/Mango 279.37 89.43 sub-total 279.37 89.43


Total 615.61 92.59

Grand Total 2,361.98 92.30


TABLE 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT

ProcuredDate/year procured

1. Truck KIA cross truck, 4x4 1 9/30/2002 680,000.00

2. Power generatorEngine, gasoline, GS 280, 3.5KVA

1 4/23/2001 44,096.00

3. ComputerHP Brio PC Intel Pentium III733 mhg

1 2/20/2001 70,850.00

4. Printer Hp Deskjet model 840 C 1 4/27/2001 5,811.52

5. UPSGamatronic Compact Model 520VA

1 4/15/2001 5,720.00

6. GIS maptitudeComb software & geographicdata

1 3/28/2001 44,460.00

7. GPS Global positioning Promark X 2 3/28/2001 210,000.00

8. Handheld radioVHF, FM COM Model IC-F3GT

4 1/12/2001 59,866.56

10. Foresters transitSurveying compass, Ushikata,model S-27

2 5/21/2001 69,680.00

11. Base radio VHF/FM ICOM 1 1/12/2001 64,789.92

12. Manual typewriter Oliveti, 18 carriage 1 3/28/2001 8,309.60

13. Brunton compass Kataoke br., Model BCD-90 3 3/28/2001 14,664.00

14. Steel nylon tape Tajima Br. 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00

15. Diameter tape Kinglong brand, 20 meters 2 3/29/2001 1,331.20

16. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 10/26/2001 7,800.00

17. Abney hand level Model:OSK 17251 3 5/21/2001 7,176.00

18. Rain gauge Digital rainwise 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00

19. Lettering set Leroy set 1 12/27/2001 4,992.00

20. Office tables Wood 8 6/1/2001 donated

21. Chairs Plastic 12 5/29/2001 1,140.00

22. Drafting table W27", L34", H43" 1 11/21/2001 2,500.00

23. Camera Canon Zoom 76 2 11/21/2001 7,800.00

24. Steel Cabinet 4 drawers, metalux brand 4 11/21/2001 23,600.00

25. Grass cutter Kawasaki engine 1 11/21/2001 15,250.00

26. Binding machineLong 21-holes, PRINCE w/6spiral binders

1 5/16/2001 9,895.00

27. Motorcycle Honda XL 125 2 168,610.56

28. Calculator Scientific FX-5000F 3 3/2/2001 6,600.00

TOTAL 1,543,942.36

Cost (PhP)ITEM Specifications Qty


TABLE 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY SUSIMO

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing Implementation, Livelihood System Development and Comprehensive Site

NFDO 3 June 2-6, 1998

2. National Site Coordinators Conference

NFDO 1October 6-10,

19993. Echo Training on Field Data

CollectionDENR Region 8 1 June 19-22, 2000

4. Orientation Workshop for SUSIMO Staff

NFDO 9November 8-10,

20005. Orientation Seminar on FSP

for the POs with Action Planning



AP 11February 21-23,


Improved Coffee Plantation Establishment

AP 10 March 7-8, 2001

8. Enhanced Forest Management Through GPS and GIS

NFDO-GIS Center 2May 30-June 9,


GPS/GIS OperationNFDO 12 June 3-6, 2001

10. Provincial Management Conference (MANCON)

PENRO Northern Samar

12 27-Jun-01


SUSIMO-COSU 9August 22-31,


Orientation on CBFMSUSIMO-COSU 9

September 13-26, 2001



2001



2001

15. FSP Year-end Assessment (CY 2001)

NFDO 1January 22-25,

200216. FSP Re-orientation Course for

SUSIMONFDO 1 March 6-8, 2002




NFDO 12November 4-8,

2002

TRAINING


TABLE 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY SUSIMO

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

TRAINING

19. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman, Northern Samar

12 7-Feb-03


NFDO 12 May 3-5, 2003


NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003

22. Financial Management Training TESDA-Las Navas 11 July 10-12, 200323. FSP-JBIC Packaging of

Terminal and Subproject Completion Reports


24. Training on Survey Registration of Protected Area Occupancy (SRPAO)

SIBP 1 23-Oct-03



Camarines Sur2



TABLE 5a. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Copra Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 212 members

Amount of investment : P 200,000

Date of Feasibility Study : 1-Nov-02

Date started : Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Sanvic Enterprise (Buyer)

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from.

50


TABLE 5b. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Palay Trading



Amount of investment : P 391,476.01

Date of Feasibility Study : 1-Oct-02

Date started : 25-Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : NFA Catubig

Net Income :

CFDF :P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from.


TABLE 5c. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Abaca Trading



Amount of investment : P 246,919.75

Date of Feasibility Study : Nov-02

Date started : Mar-03

Status : Pending

Linkages Developed : AC Tan Catarman

Net Income :



TABLE 5d. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Comodity Store




Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : 15-Aug-00

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Panel Dealer

Net Income :



TABLE 5e. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Sari-sari Store

Implementer : Subchapter PO (HIREDERA)





Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Federation-based Comodity Store

Net Income :



TABLE 5f. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Micro-lending

Implementer : Subchapter POs (HIREDERA)




Date started : 20-Oct-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DepEd Teachers and Brgy. Council

Net Income :



TABLE 5g. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Pump Boat Service

Implementer : PO Federation (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : Members/non-members




Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : LGU

Net Income :



TABLE 5h. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Copra Trading

Implementer : Subchapter PO CAPWA - Hiparayan

No. of Beneficiaries : 35 member



Date started : 01-Apr-03

Status : Suspended

Linkages Developed : Catarman Copra Buyer

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from.


TABLE 5i. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Palay Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (CAPWA)




Date started : 01-Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : NFA Catubig

Net Income :



TABLE 5j. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Comodity Store

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (CAPWA)



Date of Feasibility Study : Jun-02

Date started : 01-Nov-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Panel Dealer

Net Income :



TABLE 5k. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Micro-lending

Implementer : Subchapter POs (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : All members, Teachers and Brgy. Official



Date started : Feb-01

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DepEd Teachers and Brgy. Councils

Net Income :



TABLE 5l. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Xerox Machine

Implementer : PO Federation (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : All members, Teachers and Brgy. Official



Date started : Apr-00

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed :

Net Income :


61


TABLE 5m. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Hog Raising

Implementer : Subchapter POs (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : Subchapter Members



Date started : Dec-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DA-Catubig

Net Income :



TABLE 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA

8Catubig Watershed

Rehabilitation Subproject

2,361.98 75.03 C C C C C

2,361.98 75.03

PROJECT AREA (ha)

PROJECT COST (Mil peso)

TOTAL

STATUS OF PROGRESS(O:on going C: Completion)Region

NAME/LOCATION OF THE SUBPROJECT


TABLE 7. SMP COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

ACTIVITYTARGET OUTPUT

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST

TOTAL COST

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

1. Monumenting and Survey 4,000 ha 62.94 251,765.66

2. Location and Monumenting of UTM corners, sections and blocks 4,000 ha 187.29 749,156.36

3. Completion of Blocking of Plantable Areas 4,000 ha 138.47 553,884.45

4. Preparation and Submission of Reports 4,000 ha 62.17 248,695.35

Sub-total 4,000 ha 450.88 1,803,501.82

II. PLANNING

1. Data Synthesis and Analysis 4,000 ha 26.83 107,301.61

2. Report Writing 4,000 ha 39.80 159,196.57

3. Admin and Supervision 4,000 ha 90.00 360,000.00

Sub-total 4,000 ha 156.62 626,498.18 T o t a l 4,000 ha 607.50 2,430,000.00

Table 8

SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity

ACTIVITYTARGET OUTPUT

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST

TOTAL COST

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

1. Monumenting and Survey 6,150 ha 70 430,500.00 1.1 Establishment of tie line ha 18 110,700.00 1.2 Perimeter Survey ha 26 159,900.00 1.3 Relocation of boundaries ha 26 159,900.00

4,150 ha 141 585,150.00

3. Completion of Blocking of Plantable Areas 4,150 ha 100 415,000.00

6,150 ha 58.2 357,800.00

1:10,000 control map Features: 4.1 Location Map 4.2 Contour lines 20 M interval 4.3 Color coded slope categories 0-15% 15-30% 30-50% above 50% 4.4 Table of slope categories 0-15% 15-30% 30-50% above 50% Protection Forest Special Treatment Non-plantable Areas 4.5 Vegetative Cover 4.6 Rivers, Streams, Lakes

4.8 Occupied areas of settlement 4.9 Boundaries of section/blocks 5.0 Existing dev't (CREF or impact project, etc)

5.1 Other important features as maybe found in the area 1:2000 control map Features:

5.2 Blocks 5.3 Slope dev't categories 5.4 Infrastructure 5.5 Contour line at 5 M interval 5.6 Location map 5.7 Other important found in the area

1,788,450.00 II. PLANNING

a. Data synthesis and analysis

b. Report Writing

SUB-TOTALGRAND TOTAL 6,150 ha 290.80 1,788,450.00

2. Location and Monumenting of UTM corners, sections and blocks

4. Preparation and submission of reports (2 types of maps)

4.7 Existing and proposed structures roads, trails, buildings, nursery


TABLE 8. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

ACTIVITIES TARGET

1. Social Investigation 229,499.00

2. Information and Education Campaign 930,200.75

3. Documentation Process 155,036.00

4. Identification of Possible CBFMA 168,073.37

5. Organizing Activities 1,115,403.40

6. Community Activities 956,940.49

7. Others (CO staff dev't) 352,646.99

Total 2,171 ha. 1,800.00 3,907,800.00

UNIT of MEASURE

UNIT COST TOTAL COST


TABLE 9a. COST ESTIMATE FOR AGROFORESTY PER ACTIVITY

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTIONa. procured/purchased sdlg 1,342,444.00 1.62 2,177,879.80

Sub-total sdlg 1,342,444.00 1.62 2,177,879.802. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT

a. Brushing ha. 632.44 123.26 77,953.33b. Spot cultivation spot 570,318.50 0.55 313,675.70c. Staking (stake & labor) spot 649,596.00 0.20 127,427.09d. Hole digging spot 672,796.00 0.35 238,564.45e. Planting (including hauling) spot 672,796.00 1.50 1,008,519.00f. Tools and materials set 1 14,808.00 14,808.00

Sub-total ha. 632.44 2,815.99 1,780,947.573. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION

a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha. 632.44 8,011.30 5,066,667.18b. Replanting ha. 441.04 2,046.14 902,430.27c. Patrol Works ha. 632.44 143.98 91,061.38d. Tools and materials set 1 6,691.20 6,691.20

Sub-total ha 632.44 9,592.77 6,066,850.034. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 133.20 84.98 11,319.73b. Third Year ('99) ha 308.67 33.16 10,235.90c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 353.07 230.91 81,525.65d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 632.44 789.11 499,062.59e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 632.44 1,158.50 732,680.16f. Seventh Year ('03) ha 632.44 320.01 202,384.56

Sub-total 632.44 2,430.60 1,537,208.59Total ha 632.44 18,282.98 11,562,885.99

TOTAL COSTMAJOR ACTIVITY/ACTIVITYTARGET OUTPUT

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST


TABLE 9b. COST ESTIMATE FOR BAMBOO PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY

MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE

TARGET OUTPUT

Unit Cost TOTAL COST

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTIONa. Bamboo culm cuttings (nursery raised) sdlg 65,040.00 8.93 580,807.20

Sub-total sdlg 65,040.00 8.93 580,807.20 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT

a. Spot brushing 55,300.00 0.98 54,200.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) ha 55,300.00 0.20 10,840.00 c. Hole digging ha 55,300.00 2.94 162,600.00 d. Seedling transport spot 55,300.00 3.92 216,800.00 e. Planting ha 55.30 980.11 54,200.00

Sub-total ha 55.30 9,017.00 498,640.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION

a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer pole cutting 55.30 12,732.18 704,089.63 b. Replanting ha 55.30 5,462.66 302,084.98 c. Patrol works ha 55.30 114.21 44,209.52

Sub-total ha 55.30 18,994.29 1,050,384.13 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 1.75 172.72 302.26 b. Third Year ('99) ha 55.30 677.73 37,478.59 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 55.30 1,517.18 83,900.26 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 55.30 1,061.20 58,684.32 e. Sixth ('02) ha 55.30 791.25 43,755.89

Sub-total ha 55.30 4,052.83 224,121.31 Total ha 55.30 42,566.96 2,353,952.64

Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 9c. COST ESTIMATE FOR RATTAN PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY


TARGET OUTPUT


1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. Seedlings Purchased/procured sdlg 248,113.00 6.00 1,488,678.00 SUB-TOTAL sdlg 248,113.00 6.00 1,488,678.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT

a. Underbrushing ha 482.75 889.54 429,426.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) spot 190,856.00 0.20 38,171.20 c. Holing spot 190,856.00 0.75 143,142.00 d. Planting (inc hauling) sdlg 190,856.00 2.69 513,402.64

SUB-TOTAL ha 482.75 2,328.62 1,124,141.84 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION

a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha 482.75 5,472.05 2,641,630.48 b. Replanting sdlg 482.75 992.09 478,931.21 c. Patrol Works ha. 482.75 46.85 158,312.23

SUB-TOTAL ha 482.75 6,792.07 3,278,873.92 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 162.28 195.64 31,748.96 b. Third Year ('99) ha 456.32 279.86 127,705.36 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 456.32 428.35 195,464.87 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 482.75 244.27 117,919.96 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 482.75 280.45 135,387.35

Sub-total ha 482.75 1,259.92 608,226.49 Total ha 482.75 13,464.36 6,499,920.26

Forestry Sector Project


TABLE 9d. COST ESTIMATE FOR TREE PLANTATION/REFORESTATION PER ACTIVITY


TARGET OUTPUT


1. NURSERY OPERATIONS (SEEDLING PRODN + 30%)a. Narra (245.26 Has.) sdlg 642,203.00 2.18 1,400,668.90 b. Mahogany (245.26 has.) sdlg 625,638.00 3.48 2,177,220.24 c. Toog sdlg 180,000.00 2.73 492,153.50

d. Firebreak using Banana/abaca suckers (20.10 has.) sdlg 100,000.00 2.10 210,000.00 Sub-total sdlg 1,547,841.00 2.77 4,280,042.64

2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENTa. Strip Brushing ha 1,191.49 772.16 920,016.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) spot 1,191,490.00 0.20 237,504.00 c. Hole digging spot 1,191,490.00 0.53 631,260.00 d. Spot hoeing spot 1,191,490.00 0.40 481,260.00 e. Planting (including hauling) sdlg 1,191,490.00 1.02 1,215,645.00 f. Firebreak Establishment (Banana - 40.1 has.) sdlg 200,500.00 2.00 401,000.00 g. Tools and materials ha. 150.00 200.00 30,000.00

Sub-total ha 1,191.49 3,287.22 3,916,685.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION

a. Ringweeding, spot cultivation, fertilizer application ha 1,191.49 8,613.16 10,262,492.81 b. Replanting ha 1,191.49 1,646.36 1,961,624.39 c. Patrol Works ha 1,191.49 646.88 770,756.85 d. Firebreak maintenance ha 40.10 10,000.00 401,000.00 e. Tools and materials ha. 1,191.49 11.18 13,324.50

Sub-total ha 1,191.49 11,254.14 13,409,198.56 4. INFRASTRUCTURE

a. Nursery/Bunkhouse no. 7.00 40,696.43 284,875.00 b. Graded trail km 20.75 6,144.58 127,500.00 c. Footpath km 32.75 3,160.31 103,500.00 d. Fireline construction sq. m 75,000.00 1.25 93,750.00 e. Fireline maintenance sq. m 75,000.00 0.75 56,250.00 f. Lookout tower no. 10.00 9,150.49 91,504.87 g. PO Office no. 2.00 200,000.00 400,000.00 h. SUSIMO Office no. 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 i. Fire fighting equipment set 14.00 2,357.14 33,000.00

Sub-total ha 1,191.49 1,166.93 1,390,379.87 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 609.99 294.14 179,420.54 b. Third Year ('99) ha 706.49 651.79 460,483.97 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 881.68 696.33 613,942.84 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 1,191.49 272.15 324,261.38 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 1,191.49 632.21 753,267.81 f. Seventh Year ('03) ha 1,191.49 104.15 124,099.02

Sub-total ha 1,191.49 2,060.84 2,455,475.56 Total ha 1,191.49 21,361.31 25,451,781.62

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. PH-P135

TABLE 10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

ACTIVITIES

Physical Validation Component

1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M & E 2,171.00 ha. 44.53 96,679.50

2. Verification of boundaries, monument/markers/ mapping of established areas/plantation perimeter 2,171.00 ha. 58.33 126,631.00

3. Seedling production inventory 2,171.00 ha. 73.88 160,385.00

4. Survival inventory 2,171.00 ha. 1,194.67 2,593,618.00

5. Height and diameter measurement and assessment of overall quality plantation 2,171.00 ha. 111.53 242,139.16

6. Inspection of physical infrastructure 2,171.00 ha. 94.46 205,079.16

7. Documentation and report preparation 2,171.00 ha. 351.60 763,321.44

Sub-total 2,171.00 ha. 1,929.00 4,187,853.26

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment

1. Preparatory activities/orientation 165,000.00

2. Primary data collection and preliminary assessment 220,000.00

3. Formulation of findings and recommendations 41,250.00

4. Documentation 74,250.00

5. Final Report 49,500.00

Sub-total 2,171.00 ha. 253.34 550,000.00 T O T A L 2,171.00 ha. 2,182.34 4,737,853.26

Unit Cost Total Cost Target Output

Unitof Measure

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

Infrastructure Project : Construction of Concrete Pathways and Bridges

Location : Catubig and Las Navas, Northern Samar

Contractor : B. Vicencio Construction

Contract Cost : P15,987,981.36

Revised Contract Cost : P17,647,468.16

Contract Duration : 360 calendar days

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 21-Jun-02

Expected Completion date : 15-Jun-03

Revised Completion date : 15-Jul-03

Date of MOA with LGU : N/A

Brief description :

The completed infrastructure in Las Navas Area includes the pathway withinSan Andres to Guiguinta with a total length of 2.25 km, width: 1.2 m; 2 unitsBailey bridge with a total length of 24 m; 1 unit RCBC, 3 units RCPC and 2 unitswooden bridge. The other pathway is from sta. 0+647.79 along Road 1 to Brgy.Roxas with a total length of 179.5 linear meters and a width of 1.2 m. with 2units RCPC.

The completed infrastructure in Catubig Side were concrete pathway with thefollowing dimension: length - 2.38 km., pathway width - 1.2 m, shoulder width - 1 m; RCDG bridge with a total length of 18 m; and drainage system with 4 unitsRCBC ans 10 units RCPC.


TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. SMP 607.50 2,430,000.00 607.50 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1,765.36 3,832,600.00 1,800.00 3,907,800.00 - - - -

1. Old Sites- Year 1-Year 2

2. New Sites 1,765.36 3,832,600.00 1,800.00 3,907,800.00 - - - - - Year 1 1,180.84 2,563,603.02 1,033.17 2,243,004.95 -Year 2 584.52 1,268,996.98 233.93 507,866.56 - Year 3 - - 290.65 630,995.23 -Year 4 - - 242.25 525,933.26

C. CSD 15,272.43 31,421,186.80 19,603.36 46,302,740.08 - - - - 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 212.15 436,476.00 200.00 434,200.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC

a. Infrastructureb. Trails and footpathc. Plantation

c.1. Riverbank Protection3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 15,060.28 30,984,710.80 19,419.53 45,868,540.08 - - - -

a. Agroforestry 4,443.10 1,069,453.53 18,282.98 11,562,885.99 b. Assisted Natural Regenerationc. Enrichment Plantingd. Tree Plantation 16,466.99 29,915,257.27 19,835.13 34,305,654.08 - - - -

d.1. Bamboo 14,419.94 1,091,300.91 42,566.96 2,353,952.64 d.2. Rattan 13,066.27 5,764,837.03 13,464.36 6,499,920.26 d.3. Mangroved.4. Plantation Species 17,740.51 23,059,119.33 21,361.30 25,451,781.18

e. Timber Stand Improvement4. Inventory Residual Forest5. Income Enhancement Project

D. Infrastructure Component - 15,987,981.36 - 17,647,468.16 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,825.34 6,133,812.00 2,182.34 4,737,853.26 - - - -

-Year 1 - 417,276.98 -Year 2 1,395,953.00 - -Year 3 3,066,906.00 3,080,148.02 -Year 4 1,670,953.00 1,240,428.26

2. SUSIMO - 2,187,638.69 - 2,187,638.69 Equipment provided to the OfficeResearches conductedTrainingsOthers

GRAND TOTAL 30,132.12 61,993,218.85 32,690.16 77,213,500.19 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00

ACTIVITIESPlanned Actual 1996

Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Planned Actual



I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. SMPB. CO (Phase 1 & 2)


2. New Sites- Year 1-Year 2- Year 3-Year 4

C. CSD1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC


c.1. Riverbank Protection3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment)

a. Agroforestryb. Assisted Natural Regenerationc. Enrichment Plantingd. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bambood.2. Rattand.3. Mangroved.4. Plantation Species


D. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring & Evaluation

-Year 1-Year 2-Year 3-Year 4

2. SUSIMOEquipment provided to the OfficeResearches conductedTrainingsOthers

GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 2,171.00 1,775,879.48 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56

2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 2,171.00 1,775,879.48 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56 2,171.00 1,124,867.10 2,171.00 1,438,735.92 2,171.00 2,243,004.95

2,171.00 337,143.56 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56

- - - - 4,114.76 15,858,881.90 2,014.22 2,855,791.13 2,057.38 9,281,945.60 2,590.78 8,150,840.82 2,057.38 436,476.00 1,107.00 221,400.00 1,064.00 212,800.00

- - - - 2,057.38 15,422,405.90 907.22 2,634,391.13 2,057.38 9,281,945.60 1,526.78 7,938,040.82 240.70 1,069,453.53 133.20 130,371.08 240.70 308.67 126,660.80

- - - - 1,816.68 14,352,952.37 774.02 2,504,020.05 1,816.68 9,281,945.60 1,218.11 7,811,380.02 75.68 537,877.99 1.75 3,874.26 75.68 277,190.92 55.30 461,508.59

441.20 2,039,275.29 162.28 353,252.96 441.20 1,854,873.74 456.32 1,615,278.56

1,299.80 11,775,799.09 609.99 2,146,892.84 1,299.80 7,149,880.94 706.49 5,734,592.87

- - - - - - - - - - - -

2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 6,285.76 17,634,761.38 4,185.22 5,098,796.08 4,228.38 10,213,799.02 4,761.78 8,658,707.38

1998 1999Actual Planned

1997Planned Actual Planned Actual















GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

- - 2,171.00 630,995.23 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26

- - 2,171.00 630,995.23 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26

2,171.00 630,995.23 2,171.00 525,933.26

2,057.38 6,280,359.30 1,746.37 12,349,003.66 - - 2,361.98 8,581,404.31 - -

2,057.38 6,280,359.30 1,746.37 12,349,003.66 - - 2,361.98 8,581,404.31 240.70 353.07 1,036,070.65 632.44 4,311,469.58

1,816.68 6,280,359.30 1,393.30 11,312,933.01 - - 1,729.54 4,269,934.73 75.68 276,232.00 55.30 1,058,855.36 55.30 494,492.47

441.20 1,870,688.00 456.32 2,479,906.71 482.75 1,014,296.84

1,299.80 4,133,439.30 881.68 7,774,170.95 1,191.49 2,761,145.42

- - 2,171.00 417,276.98 2,171.00 1,395,953.00 - - 2,171.00 417,276.98

2,171.00 1,395,953.00

141,000.00 141,000.00 624,158.69 624,158.69

2,057.38 6,421,359.30 6,088.37 13,538,275.87 2,171.00 2,020,111.69 4,532.98 9,731,496.26

2000 2001Actual Planned ActualPlanned















GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

- - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - -

- - 2,361.98 13,278,714.55 - - 1,823.93 1,086,985.60 - -

- - 2,361.98 13,278,714.55 - - 1,823.93 1,086,985.60 632.44 5,613,718.86 632.44 344,595.02

- - 1,729.54 7,664,995.69 - - 1,191.49 742,390.58 55.30 335,221.97 -

482.75 1,037,185.19 -

1,191.49 6,292,588.54 1,191.49 742,390.58

3,141,674.80 2,254,305.37 12,846,306.56 15,393,162.79 2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26

2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26

596,000.00 596,000.00 826,480.00 826,480.00

2,171.00 6,804,580.80 4,532.98 19,209,167.94 2,171.00 15,343,739.56 3,994.93 18,547,056.65

2002 2003Actual Planned ActualPlanned















GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget

4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 2,171.00 3,832,600.00 2,171.00 3,907,800.00

2,171.00 3,832,600.00 2,171.00 3,907,800.00 2,171.00 2,563,603.02 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 2,171.00 1,268,996.98 2,171.00 507,866.56

- - 2,171.00 630,995.23 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26

2,057.38 31,421,186.80 2,361.98 46,302,740.08 2,057.38 436,476.00 2,171.00 434,200.00

2,057.38 30,984,710.80 2,361.98 45,868,540.08 240.70 1,069,453.53 632.44 11,562,885.99

1,816.68 29,915,257.27 1,729.54 34,305,654.08 75.68 1,091,300.91 55.30 2,353,952.64

441.20 5,764,837.03 482.75 6,499,920.26

1,299.80 23,059,119.33 1,191.49 25,451,781.18

- 15,987,981.36 - 17,647,468.16 2,171.00 6,133,812.00 2,171.00 4,737,853.26

- - 2,171.00 417,276.98 2,171.00 1,395,953.00 - - 2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26

- 2,187,638.69 - 2,187,638.69

2,057.38 61,993,218.85 2,361.98 77,213,500.19

Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL)

Annex 1a

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF VALUES, INC.

(SMP Contractor)

General Assembly

Board of Director

President/Executive

Director

CO Head Luzon CO Head

Mindanao

CO Head Visayas

COs Cebu

COs Negros

Oriental

COs Southern

Leyte

COs Leyte

COs Western

Samar

COs Biliran

COs Butuan

COs Naawan

COs Bukidnon

COs Zamboanga

COs Palawan

Annex 1c1

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF CAPWA

(Peoples Organization)

General Assembly

Secretary

BODs President

Vice President

Project Manager

Tech. Support Unit Admin Support Unit

Educ. & Training Officer

IQIS

Nursery In-charge

Admin Officer

Treasurer Book-

keeper Auditor

Forestry Livelihood

VMAFA IFA HFA CUFA MFA SUFA CAFA GFA

Sub-chapter Presidents

Annex 1c2

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF HIREDERA

(Peoples Organization)

General Assembly

Secretary

BODs President

Vice President

Project Manager

Tech. Support Unit Admin Support Unit

Educ. & Training Officer

IQIS

Admin Officer

Treasurer Book-

keeper

Auditor

Forestry Livelihood

Annex 1d1

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF TPEC-MPDAI

(M & E Physical Contractor)

Board of Director

President

Treasurer

Auditor

Admin Officer

Secretary

Forester Community

Organizer

Agriculturist

Annex 1d3

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF DEVELOPERS, INC.

(M & E Institutional Contractor)

President

Vice-President

Board of

Trustees

Administrative Support

- Admin Officer

- Finance Officer

- Secretary

- Liaison Officer

Monitoring

and

Evaluation

Desk

Research,

Documenta

tion Desk

Peasant

Community

Organizing

Desk

Socio-

Economic

and Envi-

ronmental

Desk

Annex 1f

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF B, VICENCIO CONSTRUCTION

(Infrastructure Contractor)

Project Manager

Materials Engineer

Resident/Project Manager

Administrative

Officer

Geodetic

Engineer

Equipment

Engineer

Gen. Const.

Foreman

Safety Officer

Survey Aide Mechanics Leadman First Aide

H. E. Mechanics

Drivers

Helpers

Masons

Carpenters

Helpers

Laborers

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF MASLOG, INC. (M & E Physical Contractor)

General Assembly

President

Vice-President

Business Manager Secretary Exec Director Treasurer Auditor

Board of Directors

Committees

Education and

Membership

Election and

Secretariat

Marketing and

Transportation

Finance Livelihood

Development

Audit and

Inventory

CO ORGANIZATIONAL SETUP OF BANKATON D’ SALVACION FOUNDATION, INC. (CO Contractor)

Project Officer

CO Coordinator

Area CO Area CO Area CO

CVO

Bukid

CVO

Roxas

CVO San

Andres

CVO

Bugtosan

CVO

Lourdes

CVO Mc

Arthur

CVO

Rizal

CVO

Taylor

CVO

Victory

Legend:

CO - Community Organizer

CVO - Community Volunteer Organizer

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF SACRED (CO Contractor)

Executive Director

Other Development

Programs

Micro-Finance (BOLIG)

Program HRD/Training

ME Team Program Bookkeeper HRDT Chief

Tech.

Asst./Comput

er Operator Agri-Literacy

(PACAP)

Health, Consultancy

and Envi. Programs

Project

Officer

Project Officer

Program Manager

(AUSAID)

Project

Officer

Program Manager

Part Time

Agriculturist IM’s

IM’s

IM’s

Audit/ME

Team

Program Bookkeeper

Project

Supervisor

(PEACE)

Branch

Manager

TO

TO

TO

Branch

Manager

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

TO

83

Annex 1e

ORGABIZATIONAL STRUCTURE of the SUSIMO

ss SECRETARY

REGIONAL

EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR (RED)

PENRO

CENRO

SUBPROJECT SITE

MANAGEMENT

OFFICE

(SUSIMO)

ASSISTING

PROFESSIONAL

ADMINISTRATIVE

SUPPORT

COMMUNITY

ORGANIZING AND

STRENGTHENING

UNIT

SITE

DEVELOPMENT

MANAGEMENT

SITE

VALIDATION

AND BILLING

UNIT

Farm-to-market road

Refo plantation

Portion of plantation

Agro forestry plantation

PO Field Office SUSIMO Office

Monitoring and Protection Nursery

Livelihood project – Abaca & Copra

People’s Organization

Catubig Side

Corner DISTANCE (meter)

1-2 S 33 ° 4 ' W 666.63

2-3 S 80 ° 55 ' W 542.37

3-4 N 60 ° 55 ' W 672.64

4-5 S 26 ° 35 ' W 643.68

5-6 N 75 ° 28 ' W 345.20

6-7 S 58 ° 2 ' W 1,189.47

7-8 S 67 ° 35 ' E 224.22

8-9 N 89 ° 23 ' E 809.63

9-10 S 55 ° 0 ' E 322.51

10-11 N 70 ° 24 ' E 378.84

11-12 S 0 ° 10 ' W 842.63

12-13 N 89 ° 53 ' E 646.08

13-14 S 11 ° 52 ' E 640.21

14-15 S 83 ° 52 ' E 230.72

15-16 S 0 ° 37 ' W 312.95

16-17 S 89 ° 23 ' W 2,051.12

17-18 N 75 ° 27 ' W 1,057.38

18-19 N 20 ° 38 ' E 762.56

19-20 N 8 ° 29 ' W 391.61

20-21 N 5 ° 33 ' E 580.41

21-22 N 7 ° 3 ' W 429.73

22-23 N 37 ° 54 ' W 660.97

23-24 N 13 ° 59 ' W 1,169.43

24-25 N 48 ° 45 ' E 1,219.89

25-26 N 12 ° 25 ' E 638.38

26-27 N 62 ° 17 ' E 475.59

27-28 N 89 ° 34 ' E 1,389.46

28-29 S 43 ° 19 ' E 120.19

29-30 S 9 ° 14 ' W 223.20

30-31 S 16 ° 48 ' E 217.74

31-32 S 34 ° 43 ' W 357.52

32-33 S 65 ° 0 ' W 246.82

33-34 S 81 ° 26 ' W 602.49

34-35 S 39 ° 14 ' W 929.83

BEARING

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

Catubig Watershed Subproject

Catubig Side

Corner DISTANCE (meter)BEARING



35-36 S 44 ° 17 ' E 168.61

36-37 N 47 ° 42 ' E 974.19

37-38 S 80 ° 36 ' E 548.81

38-39 N 47 ° 19 ' E 422.21

39-40 S 89 ° 40 ' E 255.38

40-41 S 76 ° 55 ' E 254.66

41-42 S 0 ° 6 ' E 797.70

42-1 S 46 ° 59 ' E 642.60

Reference point:

Corner 1: long-X 125 ° 10 ' 9 "lat-Y 12 24 ' 34 "

Las Navas Side


1-2 N 30 ° 59 ' E 1,782.60

2-3 N 76 ° 6 ' E 696.60

3-4 N 67 ° 8 ' E 427.40

4-5 N 55 ° 23 ' E 733.46

5-6 S 74 ° 42 ' E 3,623.55

6-7 S 0 ° 33 ' W 611.07

7-8 S 89 ° 45 ' W 485.98

8-9 S 1 ° 46 ' W 203.80

9-10 S 89 ° 45 ' W 998.23

10-11 N 1 ° 31 ' W 519.15

11-12 S 89 ° 54 ' W 2,482.41

12-13 S 0 ° 4 ' E 512.46

13-14 S 89 ° 45 ' W 499.12

14-15 S 0 ° 4 ' E 499.31

15-16 S 61 ° 0 ' W 2,896.64

16-17 N 84 ° 19 ' E 507.30

17-18 S 0 ° 31 ' E 1,600.99

18-19 S 86 ° 44 ' E 212.34

19-20 S 0 ° 56 ' W 510.73

20-21 N 89 ° 0 ' W 395.65

21-22 N 0 ° 18 ' E 252.47

22-23 S 89 ° 5 ' W 303.94

23-24 S 0 ° 18 ' W 745.93

24-25 S 89 ° 12 ' E 510.31

25-26 S 0 ° 18 ' W 499.21

26-27 S 89 ° 50 ' W 1,003.40

27-28 N 0 ° 1 ' E 2,237.79

28-29 S 34 ° 47 ' E 2,113.67

29-30 N 89 ° 56 ' E 592.66

30-31 S 0 ° 36 ' E 305.05

31-32 S 89 ° 56 ' W 602.33

32-33 S 83 ° 26 ' E 4,857.59

33-34 S 84 ° 51 ' W 7,053.68

34-35 S 44 ° 57 ' E 715.76

BEARING



Las Navas Side




35-36 S 0 ° 44 ' W 497.62

36-37 S 89 ° 44 ' W 508.45

37-38 N 63 ° 14 ' W 1,344.71

38-39 N 31 ° 39 ' E 1,171.43

39-40 N 74 ° 17 ' E 423.95

40-41 N 72 ° 37 ' E 5,537.07

41-42 S 46 ° 55 ' E 400.30

42-43 S 45 ° 13 ' W 756.38

43-44 N 31 ° 59 ' W 4,607.75

Reference point:


This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the

National Forestation Development Office (NFDO)

through the valuable assistance and contribution from the

DENR, Region VIII

PENRO, Catarman

CENRO, Pambujan

and staff of the

Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-CATUBIG

Las Navas Side


1-2 N 30 ° 59 ' E 1,782.60

2-3 N 76 ° 6 ' E 696.60

3-4 N 67 ° 8 ' E 427.40

4-5 N 55 ° 23 ' E 733.46

5-6 S 74 ° 42 ' E 3,623.55

6-7 S 0 ° 33 ' W 611.07

7-8 S 89 ° 45 ' W 485.98

8-9 S 1 ° 46 ' W 203.80

9-10 S 89 ° 45 ' W 998.23

10-11 N 1 ° 31 ' W 519.15

11-12 S 89 ° 54 ' W 2,482.41

12-13 S 0 ° 4 ' E 512.46

13-14 S 89 ° 45 ' W 499.12

14-15 S 0 ° 4 ' E 499.31

15-16 S 61 ° 0 ' W 2,896.64

16-17 N 84 ° 19 ' E 507.30

17-18 S 0 ° 31 ' E 1,600.99

18-19 S 86 ° 44 ' E 212.34

19-20 S 0 ° 56 ' W 510.73

20-21 N 89 ° 0 ' W 395.65

21-22 N 0 ° 18 ' E 252.47

22-23 S 89 ° 5 ' W 303.94

23-24 S 0 ° 18 ' W 745.93

24-25 S 89 ° 12 ' E 510.31

25-26 S 0 ° 18 ' W 499.21

26-27 S 89 ° 50 ' W 1,003.40

27-28 N 0 ° 1 ' E 2,237.79

28-29 S 34 ° 47 ' E 2,113.67

29-30 N 89 ° 56 ' E 592.66

30-31 S 0 ° 36 ' E 305.05

31-32 S 89 ° 56 ' W 602.33

32-33 S 83 ° 26 ' E 4,857.59

33-34 S 84 ° 51 ' W 7,053.68

34-35 S 44 ° 57 ' E 715.76

BEARING



Las Navas Side




35-36 S 0 ° 44 ' W 497.62

36-37 S 89 ° 44 ' W 508.45

37-38 N 63 ° 14 ' W 1,344.71

38-39 N 31 ° 39 ' E 1,171.43

39-40 N 74 ° 17 ' E 423.95

40-41 N 72 ° 37 ' E 5,537.07

41-42 S 46 ° 55 ' E 400.30

42-43 S 45 ° 13 ' W 756.38

43-44 N 31 ° 59 ' W 4,607.75

Reference point:


This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the

National Forestation Development Office (NFDO)

through the valuable assistance and contribution from the

DENR, Region VIII

PENRO, Catarman

CENRO, Pambujan

and staff of the

Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-CATUBIG

Documents

List of Acronymsfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files... · OJT - On-the-Job Training O/M - Operation and Maintenance PENRO - Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office