Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LCLS Transition to ScienceDOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project
Update on LCLS User Proposals
John Arthur, Jochen Schneider Experimental Facilities Division
June 25, 2009
2 J. [email protected]
2User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Far Experimental Hall
Near Experimental Hall
AMOSXR XPP
CXIXCSMEC
5,0005,0004,0004,0004,000500Photon science
experiments
9009001,3001,3001,3001,250Machine studies
photons
9009001,3001,3001,3002,750Machine studies
electrons
1,9601,9602,1602,1602,1604,260Maintenance
201420132012201120102009
Tentative operation plan for LCLS [hours per fiscal year]
Instruments and Tentative Operations Plan
Tentative instrument operation scheme
Start of commissioning,
early operations
09-09AMO
08-11XCS
05-11XCI
10-10XPP
04-10SXR
MEC
3 J. [email protected]
3User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Soft X-ray Experiments at LCLS
(500) 800 eV – 2 keV
Available March 2010Available August 2009
4 J. [email protected]
4User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Atomic, Molecular & Optical Science - AMO This instrument will enable the study of the interaction between the extremely intense LCLS X-ray pulses and the basic constituents of matter: atoms and molecules. » view instrument profile » view technical specifications
Soft X-ray Materials Science - SXR This instrument will enable the high brightness and timing capability of the LCLS to be applied to scattering and imaging experiments that require the use of soft X-rays. » view instrument profile » view technical specifications
Scientific Application Time-resolved spectroscopy and scattering with ultrafast and ultraintense soft X-rays at the LCLS
Techniques X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (XES)
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)
Coherent Imaging
Fourier Transform Holography
Sample Environment A wide range of experimental setups in UHV and UV conditions
Information on LCLS Website
5 J. [email protected]
5User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
“Experiments at the AMO beamline (0.8-2 keV)”
28 proposals were received with 219 scientists from 16 countries involved , many of them in more than one.
• Half of the proposals were motivated by single particle imaging.
• 21 proposals want to use the AMO station as built, 5 proposals want to use a special chamber built in Hamburg and moved to LCLS for the experiments, 2 proposals want to use very special chambers which the groups will provide.
Outcome of 1st call for proposals
Scientists Proposals Scientists ProposalsAustralia 4 Ireland 1China 2 Italy 8Czech Republic 4 Japan 6Denmark 1 Netherlands 4Finland 1 Poland 3France 1 Sweden 26 3Germany 70 8 United Kingdom 1India 4 1 United States 83 16
6 J. [email protected]
6User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Review of Proposals
Members of Proposal Review Panel
Christine Back (San Diego) Janos Kirz (LBNL)Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne) Dwayne Miller (Toronto)Lew Cocke (Kansas) Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich)Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK) Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund)Chi-Chang Kao (BNL) Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai)Steve Kevan (Oregon) Edgar Weckert (DESY)
Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights:
Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider
For the 1st meeting dealing mainly with proposals for AMO experiments three guests with voting rights were invited:
Chris Greene (JILA) Jon Marangos (Imperial College London)
Ian McNulty (APS, Argonne Nat. Lab.)
First Meeting December 3-4, 2008
7 J. [email protected]
7User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Results of 1st PRP Meeting
• Taking the above recommendations into account there were 23 “scientific” proposals for about 225 8 hour shifts starting September 1, 2009. The PRP allocated the following rankings to these proposals:
• Ranking 1: 11 proposals, including two with specific instrumentation• Ranking 2: 5 proposals, including one “team proposal”• Ranking 3: 2 proposals• Ranking 4: 5 proposals
10 experimentsscheduled
• 7 experiments use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 3 experiments use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg
• 3 “more technical” proposals were recommended to be included in early commissioning work
• In 2 cases it was recommended to combine two, so far separate proposals with similar scientific goals
• 2 single purpose experiments got highest ranking and were invited to discuss the technical implications for integrating the experiments into beamline at a later stage
8 J. [email protected]
8User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009
1. Linda Young (Argonne NL)Tracking transient atomic states produced by ultraintense X-ray pulses
2. Louis DiMauro (Ohio State Univ.)Strong-field multiphoton processes in the high-frequency limit
3. Nora Berrah (Western Michigan Univ.)X-ray non-linear physics studies of molecules with intense ultrafast LCLS pulses
4. Ryan Coffee (PULSE-SLAC)X-ray multiple ionization of impulsively aligned molecules
5. Linda Young (Argonne NL)Resonant nonlinear X-ray processes at high X-ray intensity
9 J. [email protected]
9User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009
6. John Bozek (LCLS)IR laser and FEL X-ray pulse cross correlation using electron energysidebandsStefan Duesterer (DESY)Dressed photo- and Auger-electrons in intense superposed X-ray andoptical laser fields and their application on timing
7. Todd Ditmire (Austin, Texas)Explosions of clusters in intense X-ray pulses
8. Christoph Bostedt (TU Berlin)Ultrafast imaging of X-ray excited clusters
9. Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY), Jochen Kuepper (ASG MPG)Diffractive imaging of oriented molecules in the gas phase
10.Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY)Coherent diffractive imaging
10 J. [email protected]
10User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
AMO Commissioning/Operations Schedule
John Bozek
11 J. [email protected]
11User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Outcome of 2nd call for proposals
“Experiments at the AMO and SXR beamlines (0.8-2 keV)”
62 proposals were received with 469 scientists from 15 countries involved , many of them in more than one.
• 24 proposals want to use the AMO, 38 proposals the SXR beamline.
• At the AMO beamline, 15 proposals want to use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 9 proposals want to use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg.
• At the SXR beamline, experimental stations will be provided by members of the SXR Consortium and used in collaboration with these groups. More specific, 11 of the proposals want to use the CAMP chamber.
Scientists Proposals Scientists ProposalsAustralia 5 Italy 20 1Canada 1 Japan 9Denmark 1 Netherlands 5 1Finland 1 Sweden 42 5France 33 1 Switzerland 9 1Germany 118 19 United Kingdom 41 3India 3 1 United States 177 30Ireland 4
12 J. [email protected]
12User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Next PRP Meeting 27-28 July
Members of Proposal Review Panel
Christine Back (San Diego) Janos Kirz (LBNL)Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne) Dwayne Miller (Toronto)Lew Cocke (Kansas) Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich)Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK) Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund)Chi-Chang Kao (BNL) Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai)Steve Kevan (Oregon) Edgar Weckert (DESY)
Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights:
Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider
Guest with voting rights invited:
Marc Vrakking (FOM Inst for Atomic & Molecular Physics, Amsterdam)
External referees asked to help with science review of proposals (send reports by early July):
Steve Kahn (SLAC), Steve Boxer (Stanford), Louise Johnson (Oxford), Wolfgang Eberhardt (BESSY), Hajo Tjen (Univ Cologne), Gabriel Aeppli (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Howard Padmore (ALS), Markus Drescher (Univ Hamburg), Ian Robinson (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Giancarlo Ruocco (Univ Rome “La Sapienza”), Juerg Osterwalder (Univ Zurich), John Costello (Univ Dublin), Lew Cocke (Univ Kansas), Jan-Michael Rost (MPI Dresden), Christian Schroer (TU Dresden), Hrvoje Petek (Univ Pittsburg)
13 J. [email protected]
13User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
CAMP Chamber Built by CFEL
CFEL-ASG Multi-Purpose chamber – CAMP adapted for
the use of unique large-area, single-photon counting pnCCD detectors from Max Planck Institute Halbleiterlabor
pnCCD
14 J. [email protected]
14User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
Future Proposals
Next closing date: October 1, 2009
Repeat on 6-month cycle….
15 J. [email protected]
15User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009
End of Presentation
