Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card2008-9

Presented to the Board of Education

May 10, 2010

Report Card Components Overview of District performance in ELA,

Math and Science and Graduation Rates Analysis of student subgroup performance Analysis of Similar Schools performance Accountability status on whether the district

is making adequate yearly progress toward enabling all students to achieve proficiency in ELA and Math

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Enrollment – 2,896 79%White 10% Black 8% American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander 2% Hispanic 9% Free Lunch 2% Limited English Proficient 96% Attendance Rate

Report Card Comparisons for Poverty 2003-4 to 2008-9 Percentages

6.9

9

6.2

9

5.8

8

6.5

9

12.7

11

67

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

District JDHS JDMS JES MD TES

2003-42008-9

Need /Resource Capacity District: Average student need in relation to

district resource capacity Schools:

All in the lower range of student need Moses Dewitt in the middle range of the student

need Based on Grade Level, Free Lunch and ELL students

K-12 Performance Grade 3-8 ELA, Math and Science 4 and 8

Assessments ELA and Math Regents and the Graduation

rate. Groups used in determining NCLB

Accountability: Racial/Ethnic, Disability Status SWD, English Language Proficiency ELL, Income

ELA 3 JD vs. Similar SchoolsPercentage Meeting the Standard

8687 8981

9187

76

0102030405060708090

100

JES MD TES NYS

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS Public

ELA 4 JD vs. Similar Schools Percentage Meeting the Standard

9589

808391 89

77

0102030405060708090

100

JES MD TES NYS

JD

Similar Schools

NYS

ELA 4 Trends 2004 to 2009Percentage Meeting the Standards

0102030405060708090

100

All Students 77 79 84 83 87 89

SWD 20 37 43 26 54 57

Black 46 47 59 58 62 64

Disadvantaged 50 58 61 48 57 62

2004 20052006****

2007 2008 2009

ELA 5-8 vs. Similar Schools92 91

82

91 91

81

91 92

8086 83

69

0102030405060708090

100

Grade5

Grade6

Grade7

Grade8

JDSimilar SchoolsNYS Public

ELA 8 Trends 2004-2009Percentage Meeting the Standard

0102030405060708090

100

All StudentsSWDBlackDisadvan

All Students 70 70 65 80 76 86

SWD 26 17 8 38 13 44

Black 40 35 45 48 38 71

Disadvan 29 43 37 48 42 51

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Summary Grades 3 -8 ELA District ELA performance is strong for all

grades with subgroups making progress to close the achievement gap

Performance 3-8 is comparable to or higher than Similar Schools performance

Grade 4 and 8 performance is higher than previous years and moving in the direction of closing the gap for subgroups.

Math 3 JD vs. Similar Schools9797 100

9599 97

93

0102030405060708090

100

JES MD TES NYS

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS PublicSchools

Math 4 JD vs. Similar Schools9594 93 90

10094

87

0102030405060708090

100

JES MD TES NYS

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS PublicSchools

Math 4 Trends 2004-2009Percentage Meeting the Standard

0102030405060708090

100

All Students

SWD

Black

Disadvantaged

All Students 90 91 85 87 91 96

SWD 34 62 50 42 62 74

Black 69 34 71 46 67 81

Disadvantaged 45 75 46 53 61 85

2004 2005 *2006 2007 2008 2009

Math 5-8 vs. Similar Schools

92 94

88

94 92

83

96 9687

91 93

80

0102030405060708090

100

Grade5

Grade6

Grade7

Grade8

JD

Similar Schools

NYS

0102030405060708090

100

All StudentsSWDBlackDisadvantaged

All Students 84 79 78 86 89 89

SWD 48 21 27 52 32 58

Black 50 52 73 58 73 79

Disadvantaged 57 59 56 63 64 74

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Math 8 Trends 2004-2009 Percentage Meeting the Standard

Summary Math 3-8 Performance District Math performance is strong for all

grades Comparable to or greater than Similar School

performance Subgroup performance continues to move in

the direction of closing achievement gaps overtime in both Math 4 and 8

Science 4 vs. Similar Schools

9896 96 95 100 9688

0102030405060708090

100

JES MD TES 09 NYS

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS PublicSchools

Trends in Science 4 - 2002 to 2006

0102030405060708090

100

All Students

SWD

Black

Disadvantaged

All Students 91 91 94 92 95 98

SWD 40 67 73 65 81 84

Black 69 69 76 67 82 85

Disadvantaged 60 74 81 69 81 91

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Science 8 vs. Similar Schools

91 928891

71

0102030405060708090

100

2007-8 2008-9 09 NYS

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS PublicSchools

Science 8 Trends 2004-2009 Percentage Meeting the Standard

0102030405060708090

100

All Students

SWD

Black

Disadvantaged

All Students 94 90 82 86 90 87

SWD 67 57 49 56 46 61

Black 70 71 61 60 65 71

Disadvantaged 81 69 52 67 69 56

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

High School Performance Based on ELA and Math Regents after 4 years and

the Graduation rate. Regents examination scores are reported in 4 score

levels: 0-54, 55-64, 65-84, 85-100

Secondary assessments are taken when students complete the coursework for the core curriculum: therefore performance is measured for a cohort rather than a grade level

Meeting the StandardsK-8 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

High School

0-54 55-64 65-84 85-100

High School English Achievement after 4 Years (Percentage achieving Level 2,3,4)

96 94 9592

83

0102030405060708090

100

2005Cohort

2004Cohort

NYSPublic 05

JD

Similar Schools

NYS Public 05

High School Math Achievement after 4 Years (Percentage achieving Level 2,3,4)

9592 93 92

77

0102030405060708090

100

2005Cohort

2004Cohort

NYSPublic

05

JD

SimilarSchools

NYS Public 05

2009 Graduation Rates for students from the 2003 (6 year), 2004 (5 year) and 2005 (4 year) Cohorts.

92

84

95

86

97

86

75 80 85 90 95 100

JD Grads

BOCES District

200320042005

2004 Cohort JD / State 2008 Graduates

92

7469

45

78

59

77

63

0102030405060708090

100

All SWD Black Disadv

JD

State

Report Card Summary Overall performance is strong Subgroups show improvement in closing

achievement gaps with most fluctuation among SWD. Some significant gains for Black and Disadvantaged subgroups ELA and Math.

High School Performance is strong for all students and improves for students with extra time.

Efforts/Directions to Improve PerformanceElementary:New Initiatives

DIBELS Assessments K-2Road to the Code in KLLI (Leveled Literacy Intervention)

Continuation of grade level meetings to analyze classroom instruction

Continuation of Morning Program

Middle School Focus on Content Area Literacy Implementation of Co teaching model Refocus of Corrective Reading to primary

grades Summer Program including SWD

High School Continue to analyze data through Department

meetings and curriculum mapping Implementation of Ninth Grade Transition

Team Study Skills Initiative