2011 School Level Report

Please check the data in this report. If, after comparing it with your own records, youdeem it to be incorrect or incomplete, follow the directions on the following website:

- http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedata

then select 'School Performance Reports'.

Goonawarra Primary School (5248)

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD

Contents

Page No.

Privacy 3

SFO Density and LBOTE 4

English Online Interview - Reading 5

- Writing 6

- Speaking and Listening 7

Teacher Judgments against the VELS 8-16

ESL Companion Guide 17

NAPLAN - Reading 18

- Writing 19

- Numeracy 20

Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students) 21-22

Enrolments 23

Student Absence 24

Opinion Surveys - Parent 25

- Staff 26

Performance & Development Culture 27

Staff Sick Leave 28

Bank Balances 29

Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 2 of 29

It is important to note that information that identifies an individual or can be used with other readily available information to identify a person is now protected by the Information Privacy Act 2000 (http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/deptpolicies/informationprivacy.htm ).

Where the School Level Report is provided to school council members as part of any annual reporting process, or used for discussion on a school’s performance, such as in consultation with the school community in the school self-evaluation process, it is important to remind school community members of their duty to only use this information for the purpose it was provided, and that the material must be kept confidential.

Privacy

When reporting on the school's performance to the school community, care must be taken to avoid the disclosure of information that can directly or indirectly identify an individual. This may be a particular issue when reporting on the achievement of specific cohorts of students or the opinions of staff where there are small numbers.

In situations where privacy cannot be assured, schools may wish to report on the mean result or provide a written comment on school, year level or cohort performance.

Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 3 of 29

SFO Density and LBOTESchool no: 5248

School name: Goonawarra Primary School

Explanation: This page contains the school's SFO (Student Family Occupation) density^, LBOTE (Language Back-

ground Other Than English) proportion* and Stability rate† (a measure of student population stability).

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011SFO density^: 0.52 0.50 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.54 0.52

LBOTE proportion*: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05

Stability rate†: 75.5% 71.2%

School's 2011 SFO density and LBOTE* proportion against that of all other government schools

School's SFO^ percentile range^^ over time

School stability rate as percentile

Notes: ^ The higher the SFO density, the lower the SFO percentileand the lower the socio-economic status (SES^^ The school's SFO percentile range shows this school's SFO percentile +/- 10%.* A student is LBOTE if either the student or one parent/guardian speaks a language other than English at home. In previous

versions of the SLR, the number of LBOTE students was undercounted. LBOTE figures from 2008 were corrected in 2011.† NAPLAN matched-cohort data is used to calculate the stability rate. Using 2011 stability as an example, the formula is:

no. of unique students at both yr3 (2009) and yr5 (2011)sum of unique students at yr3 (2009) and yr5 (2011)

Goonawarra Primary School

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1

SF

O d

ensi

ty

LBOTE proportion

0 20 40 60 80 100

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Wh

ole

Sch

ool

percentileSFO ̂percentile range^^

0 20 40 60 80 100

2010

2011

percentileSchool stability as percentile

Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 15/02/2012Page 4 of 29

English Online Interview (EOI): Reading Table 1: Definition of EOI groups

School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.

Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes

the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses beingrecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.

Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2

participation participation participation participation

(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 37 97.4 0 3 38 14 27 19 1.57 1.23 56 103 4 21 16 23 13 23 1.78 1.77 40 93 13 5 15 15 28 25 2.38 2.242010 46 95.8 9 63 28 0 0 0 0.4 0.42011 33 99.4 6 61 33 0 0 0 0.4 0.4

Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**

Ungraded student participation (n)

= 0

School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**

Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took

place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.

† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.

** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort. ^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.

student student Mean VELS Score

5248

Mean VELS Score

Percent of studentsby EOI group

Percent of studentsby EOI group

student Mean VELS Score

Percent of studentsby EOI group

student

B

egin

nin

g P

rep

E

nd

Pre

p

En

d Y

ear

1

En

d Y

ear

2

Mean VELS Score

Percent of studentsby EOI group

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipat

ion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipa

tion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipat

ion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

State Mean Score

Student Participation†

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipat

ion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

School Mean Score

Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1

VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0

VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5

VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0

VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5

VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)

End Prep>24 months above expected

12-24 months above expected

up to 12 months above expected

at or up to 6 months below expected

6-12 months below expected

bottom of scale

End Year 1>24 mths above expected

12-24 mths above expected

up to 12 mths above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected

12-18 mths below expected

>18 mths below expected

End Year 2>24 months above expected

12-24 months above expected

up to 12 months above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected

12-24 months below expected

>24 months below expected

EOI group 6:

EOI group 5:

EOI group 4:

EOI group 3:

EOI group 2:

EOI group 1:

Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 15/02/2012Page 5 of 29

English Online Interview (EOI): Writing Table 1: Definition of EOI groups

School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.

Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes

the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses beingrecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.

Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2

participation participation participation participation

(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 37 97.4 3 0 30 27 8 32 1.61 1.36 56 103 4 14 29 13 21 20 1.83 1.78 40 93 3 3 23 13 28 33 2.61 2.362010 46 95.8 35 65 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.12011 33 99.4 33 67 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1

Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**

Ungraded student participation (n)= 0

School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**

Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort. ^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.

5248

student Percent of students Mean VELS Score

student Percent of students Mean VELS Score

student Percent of students Percent of students Mean VELS Scoreby EOI group by EOI group by EOI group by EOI group

B

egin

nin

g P

rep

E

nd

Pre

p

En

d Y

ear

1

En

d Y

ear

2

Mean VELS Score

student

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

.

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipa

tion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011pe

rcen

t stu

dent

par

ticip

atio

n .

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

State Mean Score

Student Participation†

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

.

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

School Mean Score

Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5

VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)

End Prep>24 months above expected12-24 months above expectedup to 12 months above expected

at or up to 6 months below expected6-12 months below expectedbottom of scale

End Year 1>24 mths above expected12-24 mths above expectedup to 12 mths above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected12-18 mths below expected>18 mths below expected

End Year 2>24 months above expected12-24 months above expectedup to 12 months above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected12-24 months below expected>24 months below expected

EOI group 6:EOI group 5:EOI group 4:

EOI group 3:EOI group 2:EOI group 1:

Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 15/02/2012Page 6 of 29

English Online Interview (EOI): Speaking & Listening Table 1: Definition of EOI groups

School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: English Online Interview application.

Explanation: The English Online Interview is an assessment program that takes

the form of an interview between a teacher and a student, with responses beingrecorded by the teacher in an online system. It was used for assessment ofPrep-Year 2 students in Victorian government schools from October 2009*.

Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2

participation participation participation participation

(n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%)† 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State2009 37 97.4 0 5 24 16 5 49 1.86 1.30 56 103 9 25 13 11 13 30 1.79 1.87 40 93 13 15 10 20 18 25 2.33 2.292010 46 95.8 7 41 48 4 0 0 0.5 0.42011 33 99.4 12 39 39 6 0 3 0.5 0.4

Percent of student by EOI group School Mean as percentile against Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded SFO percentile range**

Ungraded student participation (n)= 0

School Mean against State Mean Beginning Prep End Prep End Year 1 End Year 2 Ungraded**

Note: * In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.† % student participation = (students who participated / February or August census enrolments) * 100.** Percentiles and state means are not applicable for the ungraded cohort. ^ EOI group definitions vary by year level. Refer to Table 1 above for EOI group definitions.

5248

student Percent of students Mean VELS Score

student Percent of students Mean VELS Score

student Percent of students Percent of students Mean VELS Scoreby EOI group by EOI group by EOI group by EOI group

B

egin

nin

g P

rep

E

nd

Pre

p

En

d Y

ear

1

En

d Y

ear

2

Mean VELS Score

student

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

.

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

pe

rce

nt s

tud

en

t pa

rtic

ipa

tion

.

me

an

VE

LS

sco

re

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

.

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

State Mean Score

Student Participation†

0

25

50

75

100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent s

tude

nt p

artic

ipat

ion

.

mea

n V

ELS

sco

re

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

0 20 40 60 80 100

2009

2010

2011

percentile

%EOI group 1^ %EOI group 2^ %EOI group 3^ %EOI group 4 %EOI group 5 %EOI group 6

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2009 2010 2011m

ean

VE

LS s

core

School Mean Score

Beginning Prep / UngradedVELS score >= 2.1VELS score = 1.6 to 2.0VELS score = 1.1 to 1.5

VELS score = 0.6 to 1.0VELS score = 0.1 to 0.5VELS score = 0 (bottom of scale)

End Prep>24 months above expected12-24 months above expectedup to 12 months above expected

at or up to 6 months below expected6-12 months below expectedbottom of scale

End Year 1>24 mths above expected12-24 mths above expectedup to 12 mths above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected12-18 mths below expected>18 mths below expected

End Year 2>24 months above expected12-24 months above expectedup to 12 months above expected

at or up to 12 months below expected12-24 months below expected>24 months below expected

EOI group 6:EOI group 5:EOI group 4:

EOI group 3:EOI group 2:EOI group 1:

Note: In 2010, only the Beginning Prep assessment took place. In 2011, Prep, Year 1 & Year 2 assessments took place at the beginnig of the year, but only the Prep assessment was mandatory, and the results are reported here.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 15/02/2012Page 7 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Year levels Prep-6 combinedSchool no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Year Levels:2009 348 10 19 61 7 3 348 3 14 73 7 3 348 2 9 82 7 1 348 5 11 76 5 2 348 3 6 84 5 22010 320 14 19 56 8 3 320 4 16 68 8 3 320 3 11 80 5 2 320 8 21 61 7 3 320 3 13 78 5 22011 281 15 21 55 8 1 281 6 17 68 9 1 281 3 16 77 4 1 281 9 20 63 7 1 281 4 16 72 7 1

Note: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

% A

% B

Prep-6(combined)

% C

% C

% D total

students % A

% Btotal

students % E

% D

% E

% E

% E

% Btotal

students % A

% B

% C

% E

% C

% Dtotal

students % A

% B

% C

% D

% D total

students % A

Reading Measurement, Chance & DataNumberSpeaking & ListeningWriting

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

per

cen

t.

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E

%ABCTrendline*

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 8 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no: Notes:

School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Reading Writingtotal total total total

students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^

2009 37 0 24 76 0 0 1.05 1.02 2009 46 0 17 63 17 2 2.89 3.02 2009 37 0 11 89 0 0 1.00 0.98 2009 46 0 13 74 11 2 2.90 2.942010 49 4 14 78 4 0 0.96 1.04 2010 49 8 24 59 4 4 2.99 3.04 2010 49 0 14 82 4 0 0.94 1.00 2010 49 0 14 71 10 4 2.89 2.952011 35 3 17 80 0 0 1.00 2011 33 18 18 52 12 0 3.02 2011 35 9 14 77 0 0 1.01 2011 33 3 21 67 9 0 2.942009 56 4 9 84 4 0 1.47 1.58 2009 54 24 20 39 11 6 3.51 3.49 2009 56 2 9 86 4 0 1.47 1.50 2009 54 2 24 57 11 6 3.42 3.422010 35 6 26 66 3 0 1.59 1.60 2010 43 14 28 33 21 5 3.45 3.52 2010 35 6 9 83 3 0 1.50 1.51 2010 43 12 19 47 19 5 3.39 3.432011 49 2 20 67 10 0 1.45 2011 44 9 30 52 9 0 3.54 2011 49 0 18 71 10 0 1.44 2011 44 5 11 75 9 0 3.432009 40 0 28 73 0 0 2.03 2.07 2009 63 27 21 35 13 5 4.07 4.00 2009 40 0 20 78 3 0 1.99 1.98 2009 63 16 13 59 10 3 3.99 3.922010 53 11 21 62 4 2 2.02 2.08 2010 53 34 13 32 11 9 4.07 4.03 2010 53 6 13 74 6 2 1.93 1.99 2010 53 4 25 57 8 8 3.91 3.942011 33 18 24 55 3 0 2.11 2011 40 33 10 33 20 5 4.03 2011 33 6 9 76 9 0 1.92 2011 40 8 15 58 15 5 3.902009 52 4 15 69 4 8 2.40 2.54 2009 52 0 10 75 6 10 2.34 2.462010 38 16 8 66 8 3 2.49 2.55 2010 38 5 16 66 11 3 2.43 2.462011 47 23 23 49 2 2 2.59 2011 47 11 26 55 6 2 2.51

Reading WritingSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^ School Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^

5248

Mean Score % of students by grade

Yr

1Y

r 2

Yr

3

Yr

5Y

r 6

Mean Score

Yr

4

% of students by grade % of students by grade% of students by grade Mean ScoreMean Score

Pre

p

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

Yr

3

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

per

cen

t

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

per

cen

t

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E%ABCTrendline*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

mea

n V

EL

S s

core

School Mean State Mean School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

mea

n V

EL

S s

core

School Mean State Mean School Trendline*

* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.^ 2011 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in June, when data from

all schools has been submitted

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 9 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no: Notes:

School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Speaking and Listeningtotal total

students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^

2009 37 0 0 100 0 0 0.99 0.98 2009 46 0 7 87 4 2 2.90 2.972010 49 0 6 92 2 0 0.94 0.99 2010 49 2 2 92 4 0 2.94 2.982011 35 0 9 91 0 0 0.96 2011 33 0 18 76 6 0 2.922009 56 0 9 88 4 0 1.48 1.50 2009 54 0 9 78 13 0 3.43 3.462010 35 3 9 83 6 0 1.49 1.51 2010 43 7 19 67 2 5 3.45 3.472011 49 0 4 90 6 0 1.43 2011 44 5 25 66 5 0 3.522009 40 0 13 85 3 0 2.02 2.00 2009 63 11 17 63 8 0 4.02 3.972010 53 6 13 70 9 2 1.94 2.00 2010 53 0 15 72 9 4 3.89 3.982011 33 9 6 76 9 0 2.01 2011 40 3 15 78 0 5 3.942009 52 0 2 85 12 2 2.38 2.482010 38 3 11 84 0 3 2.45 2.482011 47 6 30 62 2 0 2.54

Speaking and ListeningSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^

Yr

3P

rep

Yr

1Y

r 2

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

% of students by grade Mean Score% of students by grade

5248

Mean Score

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

per

cen

t

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E%ABCTrendline*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

mea

n V

EL

S s

core

School Mean State Mean School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range

* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.^ 2011 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in June, when data from

all schools has been submitted

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 10 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no: Notes:

School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Number Measurement, Chance and Datatotal total total total

students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^ students A B C D E School State^

2009 37 0 3 97 0 0 0.98 1.01 2009 46 0 17 72 7 4 2.91 2.99 2009 37 0 0 100 0 0 0.99 0.98 2009 46 0 9 83 9 0 2.95 2.972010 49 0 10 86 4 0 0.94 1.02 2010 49 0 31 63 2 4 2.99 3.00 2010 49 0 0 98 2 0 0.91 0.99 2010 49 0 6 88 6 0 2.95 2.982011 35 0 26 74 0 0 1.02 2011 33 12 24 61 3 0 3.05 2011 35 0 11 89 0 0 0.99 2011 33 0 18 76 6 0 2.982009 56 0 11 86 4 0 1.46 1.53 2009 54 15 17 52 13 4 3.44 3.46 2009 56 0 4 89 7 0 1.46 1.50 2009 54 7 11 70 7 4 3.43 3.452010 35 3 14 80 3 0 1.51 1.54 2010 43 14 19 42 16 9 3.40 3.48 2010 35 0 11 86 3 0 1.49 1.51 2010 43 9 19 51 14 7 3.41 3.472011 49 0 8 86 6 0 1.45 2011 44 5 25 64 7 0 3.51 2011 49 0 0 96 4 0 1.44 2011 44 0 18 77 5 0 3.482009 40 0 10 88 3 0 1.98 2.02 2009 63 17 11 65 5 2 4.04 3.97 2009 40 0 8 93 0 0 2.00 1.99 2009 63 10 10 76 3 2 4.00 3.952010 53 8 26 60 4 2 1.99 2.03 2010 53 23 23 38 13 4 4.01 3.99 2010 53 0 23 72 4 2 1.99 2.00 2010 53 6 17 70 4 4 3.95 3.962011 33 0 21 76 3 0 2.02 2011 40 13 18 48 15 8 3.88 2011 33 0 15 82 3 0 2.01 2011 40 10 15 50 20 5 3.892009 52 0 4 87 4 6 2.39 2.50 2009 52 0 0 88 6 6 2.38 2.482010 38 11 21 61 5 3 2.48 2.51 2010 38 3 11 82 3 3 2.41 2.492011 47 32 19 36 13 0 2.60 2011 47 13 36 40 11 0 2.55

Number Measurement, Chance and DataSchool Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^ School Mean against State Mean^ School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

Yr

3

Mean Score

Yr

4

% of students by grade % of students by grade% of students by grade Mean ScoreMean Score

Pre

p

5248

Mean Score % of students by grade

Yr

1Y

r 2

Yr

3

Yr

5Y

r 6

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

per

cen

t

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

09

20

10

20

11

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

per

cen

t

%A

%B

%C

%D

%E%ABCTrendline*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

mea

n V

EL

S s

core

School Mean State Mean School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6

percentileSchool Mean as percentile SFO Percentile range

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

200

920

10

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6

mea

n V

EL

S s

core

School Mean State Mean School Trendline*

* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.^ 2011 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in June, when data from

all schools has been submitted

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 11 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Reading0

.00

0.5

0

1.0

0

1.2

5

1.5

0

1.7

5

2.0

0

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.7

5

3.0

0

3.2

5

3.5

0

3.7

5

4.0

0

4.2

5

4.5

0

4.7

5

5.0

0

5.2

5

5.5

0

5.7

5

6.0

0

6.2

5

6.5

0

6.7

5

prep 2011 35 35 4 24 6 1 1.00 prep 2010 49 49 2 5 33 7 2 0.96 1.04 -0.07yr1 2011 49 49 2 3 7 26 10 1 1.45 prep 2009 37 37 1 27 9 1.05 1.02 0.03yr1 2010 35 35 1 23 9 1 1 1.59 1.60 -0.01yr2 2011 33 33 1 3 15 8 6 2.11 yr1 2009 56 56 1 1 9 38 5 2 1.47 1.58 -0.11yr2 2010 53 53 1 2 4 29 11 6 2.02 2.08 -0.06yr3 2011 47 47 1 1 11 12 11 11 2.59 yr2 2009 40 40 6 23 11 2.03 2.07 -0.04yr3 2010 38 38 1 1 2 6 19 3 5 1 2.49 2.55 -0.06yr4 2011 33 33 1 3 7 10 6 5 1 3.02 yr3 2009 53 52 1 3 1 1 11 25 8 2 2.40 2.54 -0.14yr4 2010 49 49 1 1 1 1 8 21 12 4 2.99 3.04 -0.05yr5 2011 45 44 1 3 5 18 13 4 3.54 yr4 2009 47 46 1 1 7 5 24 8 2.89 3.02 -0.13yr5 2010 43 43 1 1 3 6 1 13 12 4 2 3.45 3.52 -0.07yr6 2011 40 40 1 1 2 6 2 11 4 9 3 1 4.03 yr5 2009 54 54 1 2 4 2 9 12 11 11 1 1 3.51 3.49 0.02yr6 2010 53 53 2 2 1 6 3 14 7 10 4 4 4.07 4.03 0.04 yr6 2009 63 63 1 1 1 2 6 6 16 13 11 2 4 4.07 4.00 0.07

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.3 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted

Ye

ar

Le

vel

Ye

ar

To

tal1

Ass

ess

ed2

State

mean3

Difference between

school and state

mean3

5248

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

201

1

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

200

9

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean3, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 12 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Writing0

.00

0.5

0

1.0

0

1.2

5

1.5

0

1.7

5

2.0

0

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.7

5

3.0

0

3.2

5

3.5

0

3.7

5

4.0

0

4.2

5

4.5

0

4.7

5

5.0

0

5.2

5

5.5

0

5.7

5

6.0

0

6.2

5

6.5

0

6.7

5

prep 2011 35 35 5 22 5 3 1.01 prep 2010 49 49 2 5 35 7 0.94 1.00 -0.06yr1 2011 49 49 2 3 7 28 9 1.44 prep 2009 37 37 2 31 4 1.00 0.98 0.02yr1 2010 35 35 1 5 24 3 2 1.50 1.51 -0.01yr2 2011 33 33 1 2 11 14 3 2 1.92 yr1 2009 56 56 2 9 39 5 1 1.47 1.50 -0.03yr2 2010 53 53 1 2 1 12 27 7 3 1.93 1.99 -0.06yr3 2011 47 47 1 3 9 17 12 5 2.51 yr2 2009 40 40 1 8 23 8 1.99 1.98 0.01yr3 2010 38 38 1 4 8 17 6 2 2.43 2.46 -0.03yr4 2011 33 33 3 11 11 7 1 2.94 yr3 2009 53 52 1 4 1 2 10 29 5 2.34 2.46 -0.12yr4 2010 49 49 1 1 1 4 7 28 7 2.89 2.95 -0.06yr5 2011 45 44 2 2 11 22 5 2 3.43 yr4 2009 47 46 1 1 4 7 27 6 2.90 2.94 -0.04yr5 2010 43 43 1 1 3 5 5 15 8 5 3.39 3.43 -0.04yr6 2011 40 40 2 2 4 3 20 6 2 1 3.90 yr5 2009 54 54 3 3 3 6 25 13 1 3.42 3.42 0.00yr6 2010 53 53 1 3 3 1 8 22 13 2 3.91 3.94 -0.03 yr6 2009 63 63 2 4 2 9 28 8 6 1 3 3.99 3.92 0.07

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.3 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted

Difference between

school and state

mean3

5248

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

Ye

ar

Le

vel

Ye

ar

To

tal1

Ass

ess

ed2

State

mean3

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

201

1

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

200

9

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean3, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 13 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Speaking and Listening0

.00

0.5

0

1.0

0

1.2

5

1.5

0

1.7

5

2.0

0

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.7

5

3.0

0

3.2

5

3.5

0

3.7

5

4.0

0

4.2

5

4.5

0

4.7

5

5.0

0

5.2

5

5.5

0

5.7

5

6.0

0

6.2

5

6.5

0

6.7

5

prep 2011 35 35 4 28 3 0.96 prep 2010 49 49 1 5 40 3 0.94 0.99 -0.05yr1 2011 49 49 1 2 7 37 2 1.43 prep 2009 37 37 1 36 0.99 0.98 0.00yr1 2010 35 35 2 4 25 3 1 1.49 1.51 -0.02yr2 2011 33 33 3 1 24 2 3 2.01 yr1 2009 56 56 2 5 44 5 1.48 1.50 -0.02yr2 2010 53 53 1 2 3 5 32 7 3 1.94 2.00 -0.06yr3 2011 47 47 1 11 18 14 3 2.54 yr2 2009 40 40 1 34 5 2.02 2.00 0.02yr3 2010 38 38 1 11 21 4 1 2.45 2.48 -0.04yr4 2011 33 33 2 13 12 6 2.92 yr3 2009 53 52 1 3 3 6 38 1 2.38 2.48 -0.09yr4 2010 49 49 2 11 34 1 1 2.94 2.98 -0.05yr5 2011 45 44 2 7 22 11 2 3.52 yr4 2009 47 46 1 1 1 12 28 3 2.90 2.97 -0.07yr5 2010 43 43 1 1 1 7 22 8 3 3.45 3.47 -0.02yr6 2011 40 40 1 1 6 25 6 1 3.94 yr5 2009 54 54 3 4 4 38 5 3.43 3.46 -0.03yr6 2010 53 53 1 1 3 2 10 28 8 3.89 3.98 -0.09 yr6 2009 63 63 2 3 9 31 11 6 1 4.02 3.97 0.05

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.3 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted

Ye

ar

Le

vel

Ye

ar

To

tal1

Ass

ess

ed2

State

mean3

Difference between

school and state

mean3

5248

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

-0.10

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

201

1

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

200

9

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean3, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 14 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Number0

.00

0.5

0

1.0

0

1.2

5

1.5

0

1.7

5

2.0

0

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.7

5

3.0

0

3.2

5

3.5

0

3.7

5

4.0

0

4.2

5

4.5

0

4.7

5

5.0

0

5.2

5

5.5

0

5.7

5

6.0

0

6.2

5

6.5

0

6.7

5

prep 2011 35 35 3 23 9 1.02 prep 2010 49 49 2 4 38 5 0.94 1.02 -0.08yr1 2011 49 49 1 2 6 36 4 1.45 prep 2009 37 37 2 34 1 0.98 1.01 -0.03yr1 2010 35 35 1 3 25 5 1 1.51 1.54 -0.02yr2 2011 33 33 1 2 23 7 2.02 yr1 2009 56 56 2 11 37 6 1.46 1.53 -0.07yr2 2010 53 53 1 2 12 20 14 4 1.99 2.03 -0.04yr3 2011 47 47 1 5 8 9 9 15 2.60 yr2 2009 40 40 1 6 29 4 1.98 2.02 -0.04yr3 2010 38 38 1 2 11 12 8 3 1 2.48 2.51 -0.03yr4 2011 33 33 1 7 13 8 4 3.05 yr3 2009 53 52 1 2 1 1 7 38 2 2.39 2.50 -0.11yr4 2010 49 49 2 1 7 24 15 2.99 3.00 -0.01yr5 2011 45 44 1 2 7 21 11 2 3.51 yr4 2009 47 46 2 3 10 23 8 2.91 2.99 -0.07yr5 2010 43 43 1 1 2 1 6 4 14 8 6 3.40 3.48 -0.08yr6 2011 40 40 1 1 1 4 2 8 11 7 3 1 1 3.88 yr5 2009 54 54 1 1 1 6 14 14 9 8 3.44 3.46 -0.02yr6 2010 53 53 1 1 3 4 9 11 12 6 6 4.01 3.99 0.02 yr6 2009 63 63 1 1 2 13 28 7 7 2 2 4.04 3.97 0.07

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.3 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted

Difference between

school and state

mean3

5248

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

Ye

ar

Le

vel

Ye

ar

To

tal1

Ass

ess

ed2

State

mean3

-0.14

-0.12

-0.10

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

201

1

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

200

9

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean3, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 15 of 29

Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.

Measurement, Chance and Data0

.00

0.5

0

1.0

0

1.2

5

1.5

0

1.7

5

2.0

0

2.2

5

2.5

0

2.7

5

3.0

0

3.2

5

3.5

0

3.7

5

4.0

0

4.2

5

4.5

0

4.7

5

5.0

0

5.2

5

5.5

0

5.7

5

6.0

0

6.2

5

6.5

0

6.7

5

prep 2011 35 35 3 28 4 0.99 prep 2010 49 49 1 7 41 0.91 0.99 -0.08yr1 2011 49 49 2 7 40 1.44 prep 2009 37 37 1 36 0.99 0.98 0.01yr1 2010 35 35 1 3 27 4 1.49 1.51 -0.01yr2 2011 33 33 1 1 26 5 2.01 yr1 2009 56 56 4 3 47 2 1.46 1.50 -0.04yr2 2010 53 53 1 1 1 2 36 12 1.99 2.00 -0.01yr3 2011 47 47 1 4 9 10 17 6 2.55 yr2 2009 40 40 3 34 3 2.00 1.99 0.01yr3 2010 38 38 1 1 12 19 4 1 2.41 2.49 -0.07yr4 2011 33 33 2 5 20 6 2.98 yr3 2009 53 52 3 2 1 4 42 2.38 2.48 -0.10yr4 2010 49 49 1 2 5 38 3 2.95 2.98 -0.03yr5 2011 45 44 1 1 7 27 8 3.48 yr4 2009 47 46 1 3 4 34 4 2.95 2.97 -0.02yr5 2010 43 43 1 1 1 2 4 3 19 8 4 3.41 3.47 -0.06yr6 2011 40 40 1 1 3 5 4 16 6 3 1 3.89 yr5 2009 54 54 1 1 1 3 11 27 6 4 3.43 3.45 -0.02yr6 2010 53 53 1 1 2 12 25 9 2 1 3.95 3.96 -0.02 yr6 2009 63 63 1 1 1 9 39 6 6 4.00 3.95 0.04

shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.

Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for

by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.3 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted

Ye

ar

Le

vel

Ye

ar

To

tal1

Ass

ess

ed2

State

mean3

Difference between

school and state

mean3

5248

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean

Level 4

-0.12

-0.10

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

201

1

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

200

9

prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6

Difference between school mean and state mean3, by cohort group

diffe

renc

e be

twee

n sc

hool

mea

n an

d st

ate

mea

n

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 16 of 29

ESL Companion GuideSchool no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Assessment of students against the ESL (English as a Second Language) Companion Guide.

Students assessed on the ESL Companion Guide, 2011:

Reading: 0Writing: 0

Speaking & Listening: 0

Enrolment at February 2011 census: 290

Reading, 2011

Writing, 2011

Speaking and Listening, 2011

5248

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

A1.

1

A1.

2

A1.

3

A2.

1

A2.

2

A2.

3

B0.

1

B0.

2

B0.

3

B1.

1

B1.

2

B1.

3

B2.

1

B2.

2

B2.

3

B3.

1

B3.

2

B3.

3

S0.

1

S0.

2

S0.

3

S1.

1

S1.

2

S1.

3

S2.

1

S2.

2

S2.

3

S3.

1

S3.

2

S3.

3

S4.

1

S4.

2

S4.

3

Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)

num

ber

of s

tude

nts

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

A1.

1

A1.

2

A1.

3

A2.

1

A2.

2

A2.

3

B0.

1

B0.

2

B0.

3

B1.

1

B1.

2

B1.

3

B2.

1

B2.

2

B2.

3

B3.

1

B3.

2

B3.

3

S0.

1

S0.

2

S0.

3

S1.

1

S1.

2

S1.

3

S2.

1

S2.

2

S2.

3

S3.

1

S3.

2

S3.

3

S4.

1

S4.

2

S4.

3Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)

num

ber

of s

tude

nts

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

A1.

1

A1.

2

A1.

3

A2.

1

A2.

2

A2.

3

B0.

1

B0.

2

B0.

3

B1.

1

B1.

2

B1.

3

B2.

1

B2.

2

B2.

3

B3.

1

B3.

2

B3.

3

S0.

1

S0.

2

S0.

3

S1.

1

S1.

2

S1.

3

S2.

1

S2.

2

S2.

3

S3.

1

S3.

2

S3.

3

S4.

1

S4.

2

S4.

3

Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)

num

ber

of s

tude

nts

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 29/02/2012Page 17 of 29

NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: ReadingSchool no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service

website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.

Year 3 Year 5

(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 50 100 0 15 13 38 21 15 400.6 415.8 2008 60 97 12 17 32 15 17 8 467.7 492.12009 49 96 8 16 16 27 18 14 385.5 427.5 2009 54 96 4 9 41 22 13 11 485.0 502.4 School State2010 37 97 3 17 3 31 22 25 414.6 427.4 2010 41 95 10 15 33 26 13 3 469.4 497.9 2008-10 40 37 69.2 82.02011 46 94 2 9 20 16 18 36 439.9 429.9 2011 48 96 2 19 32 17 15 15 488.2 499.9 2009-11 42 38 85.6 73.7

Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean

Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range

School Mean Growth as percentile

5248

student participation** Band

Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore

student participation**

Mean ScaledScoreBand

Percent of students by NAP Band

Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC

total†MC with 2

scores

Number of students

Matched Cohort (MC)

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band3 SchoolTrendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band5 SchoolTrendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

80020

08

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

2008-10 2009-11

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re g

row

th

School Mean Growth State Mean Growth

School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008-10

2009-11

percentile

School Mean Growth as percentile

† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 17/02/2012Page 18 of 29

NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: Writing#

School no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service

website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.

Year 3 Year 5

(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 50 100 4 6 17 25 29 19 417.6 421.3 2008 59 95 8 12 34 27 14 5 471.0 496.12009 51 100 8 10 16 22 37 8 390.7 423.4 2009 54 96 6 9 24 43 17 2 483.0 491.9 School State2010 36 95 0 0 11 37 34 17 435.3 425.6 2010 42 98 10 5 25 48 8 5 473.9 492.5 2008-10 40 38 48.6 70.92011 45 92 0 2 23 18 43 14 424.8 421.0 2011 48 96 13 6 38 36 4 2 456.5 488.8

Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean

Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range

School Mean Growth as percentile

Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC

total†MC with 2

scores

5248

student participation**

Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore

student participation**

Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore Matched Cohort (MC)Band Band

Number of students

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band3 SchoolTrendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band5 SchoolTrendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

80020

08

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

0

40

80

120

160

200

2008-10

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re g

row

th

School Mean Growth State Mean Growth

School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008-10

percentile

School Mean Growth as percentile

Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).

† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.

# Writing task was different in 2011 . Results should not be compared with those from previous years.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 17/02/2012Page 19 of 29

NAPLAN Year 3 and 5: NumeracySchool no:School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Explanation: The National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is conducted each year for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. For more detailed NAPLAN data, refer to the NAPLAN Data Service

website at http://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au. A reference guide for analysing NAPLAN data is available at http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/prep10/naplan/schools/analysingnaplandata.pdf.

Year 3 Year 5

(n) (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 School State (n) (%) 3 4 5 6 7 8 School State2008 50 100 0 8 25 31 19 17 408.7 416.1 2008 60 97 7 12 43 27 7 5 467.3 487.82009 50 98 8 6 30 34 16 6 379.6 410.6 2009 55 98 5 11 36 22 22 4 478.4 495.4 School State2010 37 97 0 17 19 25 28 11 402.9 411.1 2010 42 98 0 25 25 40 8 3 473.3 501.8 2008-10 40 38 68.0 85.82011 43 88 5 14 14 24 24 19 409.4 413.1 2011 48 96 0 13 36 40 11 0 480.1 497.7 2009-11 42 40 81.4 87.9

Percent of students by NAP Band Percent of students by NAP Band School Mean Growth against State Mean

Year 3 Year 5School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile against School Mean against State Mean, School Mean as percentile againstincluding Participation SFO percentile range including Participation SFO percentile range

School Mean Growth as percentile

Mean Scaled Score GrowthMC

total†MC with 2

scores

5248

student participation**

Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore

student participation**

Percent of students by NAP Band Mean ScaledScore Matched Cohort (MC)Band Band

Number of students

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band3 SchoolTrendline*% Band 1&2 % Band 3 % Band 4 % Band 5&6

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2008

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009 2010 2011

perc

ent

%>=Band5 SchoolTrendline*% Band 3&4 % Band 5 % Band 6 % Band 7&8

0

25

50

75

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

80020

08

2009

2010

2011

perc

ent

stud

ent

part

icip

atio

n .

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re

School Mean Score State Mean Score

School Trendline* Student Participation**

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008

2009

2010

2011

percentile

School Mean as percentile

SFO Percentile range

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

2008-10 2009-11

mea

n sc

aled

sco

re g

row

th

School Mean Growth State Mean Growth

School Trendline*

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008-10

2009-11

percentile

School Mean Growth as percentile

Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

** % student participation = students who participated in NAPLAN (not absent / withdrawn but including exempt) / total number of students (including exempt / absent / withdrawn).

† The Matched Cohort total includes students who wereabsent, withdrawn or exempt in either calendar year.

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 17/02/2012Page 20 of 29

Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: Teachers assess their students' progress against the 8 VELS Domains using

a 6-point scale (students in special schools and those who cannot be assessedagainst the VELS).

Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.

Noprogress

Little progress

Satisfactory progress

Good progress

Very good progress

Excellent progress

Total students

assessed 1

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (no.)

2007EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship

2008EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship

2009EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship

2010EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship2011EnglishMathematicsScienceICTThe ArtsH&PECivics & Citizenship

2010 Primary state benchmarks*English 1 14 23 31 17 14Mathematics 1 14 26 28 17 15Science 5 13 36 21 16 9ICT 3 12 34 23 15 14The Arts 1 9 36 23 18 13H&PE 1 10 33 24 18 13Civics & Citizenship 5 15 38 19 13 9

Notes: 1 If schools provided percentages only, it is not possible to report the number of students assessed.In these cases, the total percentage (100) will be shown.

* 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted.

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 21 of 29

Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary School

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent Mathematics

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent Science

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent ICT

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent The Arts

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent H&PE

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2010 Primary state benchmarks*

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent Civics & Citizenship

0

20

40

60

80

100

Noprogress

Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress

percent English

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 22 of 29

EnrolmentsSchool no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: Enrolments at February census.

Source of data: February census.

Year boys girls total boys girls total boys girls total1998 156 186 342 24 29 531999 158 177 335 24 20 442000 165 185 350 24 19 432001 178 177 355 20 19 392002 164 169 333 18 19 372003 179 177 356 27 26 532004 185 176 361 34 22 562005 189 174 363 24 29 532006 171 163 334 21 18 392007 173 166 339 21 26 472008 172 176 348 27 24 512009 187 164 351 20 16 362010 172 151 323 20 27 472011 156 134 290 15 18 33

Total school enrolment Prep enrolment Year 7 enrolments

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Total school enrolments by gender total

boys

girls

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Prep enrolments by gender total

boys

girls

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 23 of 29

Student AbsenceSchool no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.

Explanation: The average (mean) number of absent days† per FTE** student.

Note that 20 absent days equates to 1 absent day per fortnight, and 10 absent days to 1 absent day per month.E

nrol

men

ts

Avg

abs

ent

days

/ F

TE

**

stud

ent

Enr

olm

ents

Avg

abs

ent

days

/ F

TE

**

stud

ent

Enr

olm

ents

Avg

abs

ent

days

/ F

TE

**

stud

ent

Enr

olm

ents

Avg

abs

ent

days

/ F

TE

**

stud

ent

25th ptile Mean

75th ptile

Prep 51.4 12.9 36.8 16.2 48.5 16.1 33.6 17.7 11.7 14.3 17.5Yr 1 44.6 14.9 53.8 12.5 36.1 15.6 49.2 14.9 11.7 14.1 16.5Yr 2 46.2 11.5 43.1 13.9 52.8 13.3 34.2 18.6 11.5 13.8 16.0Yr 3 50.2 14 51.2 13.7 38.0 12.8 47.6 13.8 11.3 13.5 16.1Yr 4 53.3 11.8 49.2 15.4 50.2 14.1 33.0 13.8 11.4 13.6 16.0 Notes:Yr 5 61.5 14.9 54.8 15.7 42.6 13 46.8 11.9 11.4 13.8 16.1Yr 6 45.0 14.5 62.3 18.9 53.2 13 40.3 13.2 11.8 14.2 16.7

Ungraded 15.4

P-6 mean 13.5 15.3 13.9 14.6 13.9

20082010 state

benchmark^School

†

*

**^

Includes non-curriculum absences only (absence codes 200, 201, 202,203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 300, 401, 500, 700, 800, 804,805, 900).The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for eachcalendar year.FTE = Full Time Equivalent (incuding part-time & part-year fractions).2011 benchmarks and percentiles will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted.

2009 2010 2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Ungraded Prep-Yr6

Da

ys o

f ab

sen

ce p

er

FT

E**

stu

de

nt

.

School Mean against State Mean^

School Mean State Mean^ School Trendline*

Impr

ovem

ent

.

0 20 40 60 80 100

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

2008200920102011

Pre

pY

r 1

Yr

2Y

r 3

Yr

4Y

r 5

Yr

6U

ngr

aded

Pre

p-Y

r6

percentileSchool as percentile SFO Percentile range

School Mean as percentile against SFO percentile range^

Improvement

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 24 of 29

Parent OpinionSchool no: 5248 School Mean as percentile (by school type)School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: A self-completion questionnaire to obtain parents' opinions of the school. Parents rated a number of statements using

a scale where 1=strongly disagree & 7=strongly agree. The statements were grouped into the following categories.Source of data: Data scanned from questionnaires completed by parents

Variable Variable Variable

No. Name Year No. Name Year No. Name Year1 School Improvement 2009 5.38 5.75 7 Reporting 2009 5.42 5.62 13 Student Safety^ 2009 5.44 5.21

2010 4.90 5.71 2010 5.00 5.62 2010 4.81 5.262011 4.83 5.76 2011 5.19 5.68 2011 4.66 5.29

2 Approachability 2009 5.65 5.83 8 Learning Focus 2009 5.39 5.74 14 Classroom Behaviour^ 2009 4.08 4.222010 5.04 5.82 2010 5.37 5.75 2010 3.97 4.212011 5.45 5.88 2011 5.11 5.79 2011 3.80 4.28

3 Teacher Morale 2009 5.43 5.86 9 Transitions 2009 5.48 5.80 15 Connectedness to Peers 2009 5.62 5.842010 5.08 5.88 2010 5.23 5.81 2010 5.58 5.852011 5.18 5.93 2011 5.25 5.85 2011 5.77 5.90

4 Parent Input 2009 4.95 5.61 10 Extra Curricula 2009 5.05 5.19 16 Student Motivation 2009 5.57 5.712010 4.53 5.53 2010 4.79 5.17 2010 5.47 5.732011 4.83 5.60 2011 4.52 5.23 2011 5.58 5.78

5 Stimulating Learning 2009 5.44 5.85 11 Homework 2009 5.29 5.29 17 Social Skills 2009 5.40 5.812010 5.20 5.86 2010 5.22 5.29 2010 5.66 5.812011 5.23 5.92 2011 5.02 5.34 2011 5.68 5.86

6 Behaviour Management 2009 5.16 5.55 12 General Satisfaction 2009 5.78 5.92 18 School Connectedness 2009 5.39 5.872010 4.76 5.52 2010 5.53 5.90 2010 5.60 5.882011 4.95 5.61 2011 5.28 5.95 2011 5.76 5.93

School Mean against Primary State Mean

Notes: * The school trendline is plotted when there is data for each calendar year. ^^ Benchmarks available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special and SDS schools.

** If there were 6 or less respondents, table data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons.

^ Parents' responses to all negatively phrased questions have been reversed for reporting purposes. Across all variables, the higher the score or percentile rank, the more positive parents' perceptions.

State Primary median

School mean

School mean

School mean

State Primary median

State Primary median

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

SchoolImprov.

Approa-chability

TeacherMorale

ParentInput

Stim.Learning

Beh.Manag.

Report-ing

LearningFocus

Tran-sitions

ExtraCurricula

Home-work

GeneralSatis.

StudentSafety^

Class.Beh.^

Connect.to Peers

StudentMotiv.

SocialSkills

SchoolConnect.

School Climate StudentBehaviour^

StudentEngagement

1=st

rong

ly d

isag

ree,

7=

stro

ngly

agr

ee

School Mean State Median School Trendline*

Impr

ovem

ent

.

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1516

1718

Sch

ool C

lima

teS

tud

ent

Be

havi

our

^S

tud

ent

En

gag

eme

nt

percentileSchool Mean as percentile

Improvement

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 25 of 29

Staff Opinion Number of respondents**

School no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: A self-completion questionnaire to obtain the staff's opinions of the school. The survey was administered online using the School Organisational Health Questionnaire.

The questionnaire and survey methodology changed in 2011. Only those factors that have remained similar are shown.

Source of data: Data transmitted from school staff to DEECD via an online survey application.

Factor Factor Factor

No. Name YearSchool mean No. Name Year

School mean No. Name Year

School mean

1 2009 62.3 79.1 9 Empowerment 2009 58.8 77.7 17 Student Management 2009 80.0 82.52010 65.7 78.3 2010 59.4 76.8 2010 80.9 82.6 No. invited2011 70.4 79.3 2011 63.3 76.6 2011 83.1 81.6 2009 29

2 2009 59.1 80.9 10 Ownership 2009 67.2 84.2 18 Curriculum Processes 2009 71.4 78.6 2010 292010 65.0 80.3 2010 71.3 83.9 2010 74.6 78.1 2011 N/A**2011 61.9 81.3 2011 73.8 84.2 2011 87.5 81.9

3 2009 72.7 81.5 11 Appraisal & Recognition 2009 59.1 75.4 19 Student Motivation 2009 72.9 80.4 School Mean as percentile (by school type)2010 69.7 80.8 2010 59.4 74.8 2010 67.7 80.92011 79.6 79.7 2011 59.4 73.1 2011 76.3 82.1

4 2009 57.8 74.3 12 Employee Development 2009 51.9 77.0 20 Respect for Students 2009 78.4 88.32010 60.0 72.7 2010 56.0 76.0 2010 78.9 88.32011 66.3 75.5 2011 60.6 78.0 2011 84.4 91.7

5 2009 60.5 82.2 13 Work Demands 2009 53.5 59.0 25 Quality Teaching 2009 69.1 85.12010 70.3 81.5 2010 50.0 57.8 2010 70.2 84.92011 73.1 83.0 2011 60.2 60.3 2011 78.1 85.5

7 2009 72.1 81.6 14 Student Behaviour (Time) 2009 77.9 87.82010 78.8 81.4 2010 82.9 87.72011 79.7 80.3 2011 89.3 89.0

8 2009 68.2 83.2 16 Student Behaviour (School) 2009 66.8 81.12010 75.0 83.1 2010 66.2 81.92011 70.3 82.3 2011 78.1 86.5

School Mean against Primary State Median

Notes: * The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.**

^ The higher the school mean, the more positive the outcome for all factors.† The higher the school percentile, the more positive the outcome for all factors

^^ Benchmarks are available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special & SDS schools.

Individual MoraleNo. of respondents Response Rate

8 N/A**School Morale 20 69%

State Primary median

State Primary median

State Primary median

21 72%

In 2011, response rates were not calculated. The number of respondents represent those who answered 50% or more of the survey questions. If there were 6 or less respondents, table data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons.

Individual Distress

School Distress

Supportive Leadership

Role Clarity

Professional Interaction

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

200

9

201

0

201

1

IndividualMorale

SchoolMorale

IndividualDistress

SchoolDistress

SupportiveLeadership

RoleClarity

ProfessionalInteraction

Empower-ment

Ownership Appraisal &Recognition

EmployeeDevelopment

WorkDemands

StudentBehaviour

(Time)

StudentBehaviour(School)

StudentManagement

CurriculumProcesses

StudentMotivation

Respect forStudents

QualityTeaching

EMPATHY CLARTIY ENGAGEMENT LEARNING

STAFF WELLBEING SCHOOL CLIMATE STUDENT BEHAVIOUR TEAM-BASED PRACTICE TEACHING AND LEARNING

School Mean State Median School Trendline*

Impr

ovem

ent

^ .

Element:

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2009 2010 2011

Num

ber

of r

espo

nden

ts

0 20 40 60 80 100

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

200920102011

12

34

57

89

1011

1213

1416

1718

1920

25

Em

path

yC

larit

yE

nga

gem

ent

Lear

nin

g

Sta

ff W

ellb

eing

Sch

ool C

limat

eS

tud

ent

Beh

avi

our

Tea

m-B

ased

Pra

ctic

eT

each

ing

and

Lea

rnin

g

percentileSchool Mean as percentile

Improvement † .

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 26 of 29

Performance & Development Culture (P&DC)††

School no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: The data on this page refers to the Staff Opinion Survey.

Source of data: Data transmitted from school staff to DEECD via an online survey application.

School Mean against Primary State Median

Notes:†† An assessment of the correlation between the P&DC Questionnaire and the Staff Opinion Survey was undertaken using data from Victorian Government schools that completed both surveys from .

2005 to 2007 (ie. 699 schools). This led to the identification of the components of the Staff Opinion Survey that could be used to assist schools with the ongoing monitoring of their performance .and development culture. Refer to the P&DC website for further information: http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/panddc/default.htm. For numerical results .relating to the above graph, refer to the Staff Opinion Survey page in this report. .

† Note that there is no significant correlation between the Staff Opinion Survey and P&DC elements 1 (Induction) and 3 (Customised Individual Development Plans). .^ The P&DC threshold was derived from the P&DC Questionnaire 'percent favourable' methodology where a school is considered at the standard of accreditation when their Element score is >75% .

favourable (ie. at least 75% of staff selected the top two response categories in the P&DC Questionnaire). .* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year. .

** If there were 3 or less respondents, graph data is not shown for confidentiality reasons. .^^ Benchmarks are available for Primary, Secondary, Pri/Sec, Special & SDS schools. .

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10020

09

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

2009

2010

2011

ProfessionalInteraction

Appraisal &Recognition

QualityTeaching

Appraisal &Recognition

QualityTeaching

Ownership EmployeeDevelopment

ProfessionalInteraction

Appraisal &Recognition

QualityTeaching

Ownership Empowerment

ELEMENT 1†:INDUCTION

ELEMENT 2:MULTIPLE SOURCES

OF FEEDBACK

ELEMENT 3†:CUSTOMISED

INDIVIDUALDEV. PLANS

ELEMENT 4:QUALITY PROFESSIONAL

DEVELOPMENT

ELEMENT 5:STAFF BELIEF IN PERFORMANCE &

DEVELOPMENT CULTURE

School Mean State Median School Trendline* P&DC threshold^

Impr

ove

men

t .

Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 27 of 29

Staff Sick LeaveSchool nSchool n Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanat The number of non-certificated and total sick leave days taken per staff member. A detailed

explanation on how staff sick leave is calculated is provided at: www.education.vic.gov.au/

management/schoolimprovement/performancedata/performancereportsfaq.htm.Source of data: Human Resources Management System (HRMS)^.

Non-Certificated sick leave days per staff member^

Staff Type2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2011**

2011 State

Median†

Teacher 2.95 2.63 3.02 1.97 2.84 2.43 2.83 2.40ES^^ 1.78 0.95 0.71 1.27 3.33 2.44 3.25 1.69

Total sick leave days per staff member^

Staff Type2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2011**

2011 State

Median†

Teacher 8.71 11.06 9.64 6.33 9.83 11.58 6.52 6.35ES^^ 5.35 13.26 2.25 3.35 7.75 4.77 6.60 10.74

NON-CERTIFICATED sick leave

TOTAL sick leave

Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.

** The way in which sick leave data are calculated changed in 2008. As such, data from2008 cannot be compared with previous years.

^ There may be some discrepancy between the results from CASES21 and those fromHRMS. The latter are considered to be more accurate.

^^ Data for ES (Education Support) staff is only available from 2003.† 2011 school data and state benchmarks will be available from March.

5248

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2011

**

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2011

**

Teaching staff ES staff^^

avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2011

**

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

**

2009

**

2010

**

2011

**

Teaching staff ES staff^^

avg

days

per

sta

ff m

embe

r .

Legend: State 90th percentile

State 75th percentile

State Median

State 25th percentile

State 10th percentile

School

School Trendline*

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 28 of 29

Bank BalancesSchool no: 5248School name: Goonawarra Primary SchoolExplanation: Account balance figures include official and investment accounts, and are

calculated by taking the opening balance at 1st January plus the total receiptsat 31st December less total payments at 31st December.

Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts)2004 $184,063 2008 $264,5022005 $100,632 2009 $127,1872006 $172,503 2010 $156,9082007 $278,089 2011 $117,794

Account Balances

Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts) per student†

2004 $511 2008 $7532005 $273 2009 $3622006 $504 2010 $4892007 $818 2011 $420

School account balances per student enrolled in August census plotted on state Primary benchmarks^

Legend:

Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.† The account balance per student has been calculated to enable some comparison to be made between schools.^ Benchmarks for primary, secondary, pri/sec, SDS, special and language schools. 2011 benchmarks will be calculated in June, when data from all schools has been submitted.

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

90th percentile

75th percentile

Median

25th percentile

10th percentile

School

School Trendline*

Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 1/03/2012Page 29 of 29