Upload
tdgomli
View
307
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OMLI @ STOLLER
2005 - 2008+ + + and more +++
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Stoller Middle School
Beaverton, Oregon
Our School islocated near the north boundary of the Beaverton School District
We haveapproximately 1100 Students
in Grades 6 - 8
12 Core Math Teachers3 Special Education Teachers co-teaching Math
1.5 ELL Teachers supporting their students in Math
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Our First Year‘05 - ‘06
• Leaders:– Florence Richey – Nancy Fowler; Gail Hjorth; Cathy Windsheimer
• Professional Development Dates 2005 – 2006• August Inservice
• Introducing Discourse When Teaching Math• December 2nd Looking at Discourse in the Math Classroom
• Classroom Data Snaps • January 20th Looking at Discourse in the Math Classroom
•Classroom Data Snaps • March 21st, March 22nd, April 13th,May 11th, May 25th
• Best Practices Course for ALL Math Staff resulting in Individual & Department Action Plans
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Year 2‘06 - ‘07
Leaders: Florence Richey; Gail Hjorth; Cathy Windsheimer
• Professional Development Dates 2006 – 2007• August Revisit Best Practices & Personal Goals• Dec 1st OMLI PD – Deprivatizing our classrooms• Jan 20th OMLI PD - Deprivatizing our
classrooms• Mar 2nd OMLI PD - Deprivatizing our
classrooms• Mar Portland Public School Visitations
• Professional Learning Community Meetings – monthly
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Year 3‘07 - ‘08
Leaders: Dwight Jerde; Gail Hjorth; Cathy Windsheimer
• Professional Development Dates 2007 – 2008August Inservice Consecutive Sums – Working on math togetherOctober 12th Technology in the Math Classroom (Hjorth)October 15th Pool Border - Multiple RepresentationsNovember 6th Sharing from Grade 7–Multiple RepresentationsDec. Jan. Classroom Study Island InstructionMarch 18th Proficiency / Sufficiency ModelsApril 22 Looking at Student DataMay 6th Growing Dots - Planning a Lesson
• PLC Meetings – monthlyQuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Stoller Middle SchoolOMLI Action Plan2008 - 2011
Overriding Goals
Mathematical Goal: Implementation of assessment by using proficiency / sufficiency models for mathematical tasks grades 6 - 8
Socio Mathematical Goal: Doing math tasks together; justifying conjectures; looking for multiple representations multiple representations
Pedagogical: •Analyzing math tasks together (students and ours)•Valuing justification and multiple representations•Seeing ourselves as learners•Shared Leadership
Colleagues and Mentors:•Stoller Math Staff•SPED; ESL; IAs•Dwight Jerde•Math Coach
Goal: • Professional Learning Community Grade Level Teams
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
2008 - 2009Professional Development at a Glance:
September
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Introducing Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
Introduction by MS Assessment Participants
October
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
6th Grade leads "task" and student work for moderation
November
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
Grade Level Work to develop a common assessment task
December
Celebration
January
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
8th Grade leads "task" and student work for moderation
February
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
Grade Level moderation to assess effectiveness of Nov. work
March
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
7th Grade leads "task" and student work for moderation
April
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: A Look Back Proficiency / Sufficiency Models
"What does it mean for our teaching and students?"
May
Celebration
Our Action Plan
Scaling Up‘08 - ‘09
Collaborating to define Proficiency / Sufficiency expectations for students
through the study of mathematics together.
We have built a community of trusting professionals who can tackle difficult
issues with professionalism!
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
2009 - 2010Professional Development at a Glance:
September
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Begin discussion to Define, Articulate and Implement Sufficiency Guidelines in support of Proficiency Targets
October
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Provide grade level time for teachers to work on guidelines for evidence of sufficiency towards one Proficiency Target
November
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: 6th grade provides Sufficiency evidence of one Proficiency Target for team analysis
December
Celebration
January
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Provide grade level time for teachers to work on guidelines for evidence of sufficiency towards one Proficiency Target
February
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: 8th grade provides Sufficiency evidence of one Proficiency Target for team analysis
March
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Provide grade level time for teachers to work on guidelines for evidence of sufficiency towards one Proficiency Target
April
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: 7th grade provides Sufficiency evidence of one Proficiency Target for team analysis
May
Celebration
"What does it mean for our teaching and students?"
Our Action Plan
Scaling Up‘09 - ‘10
Collaborating to implement Proficiency / Sufficiency expectations for students
through the study of mathematics together.
We have built a community of trusting professionals who can tackle difficult
issues with professionalism!
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
2010 - 2011Professional Development at a Glance:
September
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Year Goal: Part I Sufficiency / Proficiency to be the norm for evaluating student performance
Part II Establish parent communication
October
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Grade Level Collaboration doing math with parents to establish baseline informational setting
November
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Grade level moderation to evaluate student proficiency / sufficiency work (reflecting and refining work we have done)
December
Celebration
January
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Grade Level Collaboration doing math with parents to establish baseline informational setting
February
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Cross-Grade level moderation to evaluate student proficiency / sufficiency work (reflecting and refining work we have done)
March
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: Grade Level Collaboration doing math with parents to establish baseline informational setting
April
Pedagogical: Shared norms, values and leadership
Mathematical: All grades evaluate student proficiency / sufficiency work (reflecting and refining work we have done)
May
Celebration
"What does it mean for our teaching and students?"
Our Action Plan
Scaling Up‘10 - ‘11
Collaborating to refine the cycle of Proficiency / Sufficiency expectations
for students through the study of mathematics together.
We have built a community of trusting professionals who can tackle difficult
issues with professionalism!
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.