Upload
dangdang
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
XCV MEETING OF CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS OF THE CENTER FOR LATIN AMERICAN MONETARY STUDIES
Julio Velarde Governor
Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Normalization of the Monetary Policy in the Industrialized Economies and Possible Effects on
the Latin America and Caribbean Region
Contents
1. Withdrawal of monetary stimulus: associated risks.
2. Impact on the LAC region and Peru. 3. Policy response to a sudden capital reversal event.
2
After the 2008 crisis, the major central banks expanded their balance sheets and have kept historically low interest rates since then.
Central Banks: Total Assets
Forecast
Source: Credit Suisse.
3
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
7,00
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
U.S. nominal yields(per cent)
Nominal yield-Short term (3 M) Nominal yield-Long term (10 y)Average 90-06 (Short term 3 m) Average 90-06 (Long term 1 y)
Source: Bloomberg
The withdrawal of monetary stimulus implies two kinds of risks: (i) unexpected increase in interest rates…
Interest rate: disorderly increase or overshooting vs. gradual and predictable adjustment:
• Capital losses on fixed-rate securities. • Increase in banks’ credit risk. • Spillovers to other countries or markets.
IMF: “Shifting expectations for the path of future interest rates can lead to financial flows between markets and countries that could be sudden and potentially disruptive, especially if the timing of tightening differs across central banks”.
Source: IMF, GFSR, April 2013.
4
U.S. Treasury sell-off episodes (In percent)
Asset Holdings of Major Central Banks Related to MP-Plus, 2008-13Dec-08 Dec-11 Dec-12 Abr-13 % of assets
ECB (in billions of euros)Total liquidity 843 864 1109 852 32,6Assets Purchases Covered Bonds (CBPP) 62 69 63 2,4 Goverment Bonds (SMP) 213 208 203 7,8
Memorandum items: Total assets 2043 2736 3011 2611 Total assets % GDP 22 29 32 28FED (in billions of U.S. dollars)Total liquidity 828 110 10 9 0,3Asset Purchases Agency MBS - GSE 837 887 1121 33,4 Agency Debt - GSE 20 104 77 72 2,1 Treasuary Securities 476 1672 1657 1848 55,0Memorandum items: Total assets 2241 2928 2949 3359 Total assets % GDP 16 19 19 21Source: IMF, Global Financial Stability Report April 2013.
… and (ii) unexpected assets sales.
5
MBS: 10% of marketable debt. Treasury: 20% of marketable debt.
Asset sale risks:
• Shifts in market sentiment may lead to sharp increases in yields.
• Policy missteps may disrupt markets. If central banks sell assets before underlying market vulnerabilities are addressed, dysfunction could resurface.
IMF: “This risk is heightened in markets where central banks hold a large share of outstanding securities or played an important market-making role, especially if ongoing market dysfunction is now masked by central bank intervention”.
Foreign and commercial banks would be the most affected by a sell-off.
6
Source: Deutsche Bank
Source: Deutsche Bank
Contents
1. Withdrawal of monetary stimulus: associated risks. 2. Impact on the LAC region and Peru. 3. Policy response to a sudden capital reversal event.
7
Transmission channels of QE withdrawal and rate increases
8
Global recovery and decreasing risks
Withdrawal of monetary stimulus in developed economies
Appreciation pressures
Growth pressures
Capital outflows
Fall in speculative demand for
commodities
Fall in commodity
prices
Contraction of nonbank financing
Fall in bank credit
Fall in asset prices
Depreciation
pressures
Increase in emerging economies’ exports
Recession pressures
Increase in international interest rates
Asset sales
Lower demand for emerging
economy assets
Capital flows to the region have surged due to abundant international liquidity. Higher current account deficits increase the risks of a sudden capital reversal event.
Capital inflows respond to short-term (interest differentials) as well as structural factors (better growth prospects and credit ratings).
Lack of financial depth, which in a context of persistent capital inflows may contribute to: – Generating unsustainable expansion in the non-tradable sector – Accelerating credit expansion. – Formation of asset bubbles. – Increasing household and firm indebtedness.
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Jan-1
0F
eb-1
0M
ar-
10
Apr-
10
May-1
0Jun-1
0Jul-10
Aug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-
10
Nov-1
0D
ec-1
0Jan-1
1F
eb-1
1M
ar-
11
Apr-
11
May-1
1Jun-1
1Jul-11
Aug-1
1S
ep-1
1O
ct-
11
Nov-1
1D
ec-1
1Jan-1
2F
eb-1
2M
ar-
12
Apr-
12
May-1
2Jun-1
2Jul-12
Aug-1
2S
ep-1
2O
ct-
12
Nov-1
2D
ec-1
2Jan-1
3F
eb-1
3M
ar-
13
Apr-
13
Portfolio flows to Latin America*(weekly flows, US$ million)
*Includes dedicated and non-dedicated funds.Source: Barclays.
QE2 LTRO1 LTRO2 QE3
-5,0
-4,0
-3,0
-2,0
-1,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013*
LAC5: Current account balancePercent of GDP
Brazil Chile Colombia
Mexico Peru LAC5
*Forecast.LAC5: Weighted average of listed economies.Source: IMF and BCRP.
9
Contents
1. Withdrawal of monetary stimulus: associated risks. 2. Impact on the LAC region and Peru. 3. Policy response to a sudden capital reversal
event.
10
1. Lower asset prices in emerging markets
Then, depending on how the withdrawal is executed… 2. Lower appreciation pressures (or even a switch to depreciation) 3. Reduction in liquidity both in foreign and domestic currency
(depending on pressures coming from FOREX market) 4. Capital losses if the financial system holds an important position
in these assets 5. Contraction of foreign funding
Withdrawal of monetary stimulus in industrialized economies would imply new equilibrium interest rates and…
In Latin America, these impacts would be cushioned by preventive measures and policy actions.
11
The region’s macroeconomic strengths limit risks, thereby maximizing the benefits from capital inflows. Unlike pre-crisis years, current account deficits are financed mainly by FDI flows.
Several countries’ foreign positions are stronger than in the runup to the global financial crisis.
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012*
Latin America: Current and Capital Acount BalancePercent of GDP
Non-FDI Reserves
FDI CA Def icit
*Forecast.Source: IFM.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico Peru
External Vulnerability Indicator (EVI)
2006
2012*
EVI=(Short-Term External Debt + Currently Maturing Long-Term External Debt + Total Nonresident Deposits Over One Year)/Of f icial Foreign Exchange Reserves.*Forecast.Source: Moody's.
12
Most Latin American economies had implemented precautionary rules even before the current surge of international capital inflows.
Measures\Countries Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Paraguay Peru Uruguay
Spot
Forward
Swap transactions
Reserve requirements
Private Pension Funds
Insurance Companies
Entry
Exit
Central Bank Notes
Fixed Income Notes
Variable Income Notes
FX Forwards
1/ Limit: the lowest of US$ 3 bn or the level of regulated equity in the FX short position.2/ Increase in the net FX position-‐to-‐effective equity ratio.3/ Decrease in the aggregate FX over-‐purchase position and the net FX derivate position relative to the effective equity.Source: central bank websites and other reports.
Foreign
Exchange
Interventio
nsMacroprudentia
l Policies
Non-‐remunerated deposits as percentage of capital inflows
Limits on the permanence of capital flows
Modifications to net FX position limits
Modifications to capital requirements
Taxes and charges ondomestic asset holdings
Taxes, charges, and limits on entry/exitof international capital flows
Foreign exchange market intervention
Increase in the limit on investments abroad
13
Credit easing before cutting policy rates
Ac$ons
• Rapid and drastic cuts in reserve requirement ratios in soles and US$.
• Maturity extensions of REPOS up to a year.
• New instruments such as dollar SWAPS. • Purchase of CDBCRP in the secondary
market
Mone
y ma
rket
Capit
al ma
rket
Objec$ves
• Provide liquidity to markets
• Induce corrections in asset prices.
• Reduce pressures on short-term funding in the banking system.
Avoid steeper yield curve and illiquidity in the credit markets
Recover the effectiveness of the transmission of monetary policy actions through interest rates
The experience of Peru’s Central Bank with external shocks has shaped its policy response.
Bids for BTP in the secondary market 14
Monetary Policy Responses since September 2008
The preventive actions taken by the Central Bank increased its capacity to face capital outflows during the recent financial crisis.
q Sales of foreign currency (US $ 7,128 millions). q Issuance of central bank dollar-indexed CDs (US
$ 4,625 millions).
Ac$ons Avoid transitory large exchange rate depreciations that could damage the ba lance shee ts o f f i rms and households (liability dollarization).
Fore
ign
Exch
ange
Ma
rket
Objec$ve
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
2,60
2,70
2,80
2,90
3,00
3,10
3,20
3,30
3,40
05-D
ec-0
701
-Jan
-08
28-J
an-0
824
-Feb
-08
22-M
ar-0
818
-Apr
-08
15-M
ay-0
811
-Jun
-08
08-J
ul-0
804
-Aug
-08
31-A
ug-0
827
-Sep
-08
24-O
ct-08
20-N
ov-0
817
-Dec
-08
13-J
an-0
909
-Feb
-09
08-M
ar-0
904
-Apr
-09
01-M
ay-0
928
-May
-09
24-J
un-0
921
-Jul
-09
17-A
ug-0
913
-Sep
-09
10-O
ct-09
06-N
ov-0
903
-Dec
-09
30-D
ec-0
926
-Jan
-10
22-F
eb-1
021
-Mar
-10
17-A
pr-1
014
-May
-10
10-J
un-1
007
-Jul
-10
Millio
ns o
f dol
lars
PEN
soles
per
dol
lar
Peru: Exchange rate, Net Forex purchases and Readjustable Central Bank at maturity
(In US$ millions, exchange rate in PEN soles per US$)
Total net purchases CDR BCRP at maturiy Exchange rate
Purchases1/
Accumulated 2007 10 306Accumulated 2008 2 754Accumulated 2009 108Accumulated 2010, at 7 de july 3 568Accumulated 2007 - 2010 16 7351/ Negativ sign indicates sales of US$ dollars.
Source: Central Bank of Peru 15
A quick and effective policy response during the turmoil of 2007-2009 prevented a major impact of the financial crisis on the Peruvian financial system, preserving adequate credit
conditions and a stable business environment.
Number of insolvency applicaAons to INDECOPI
170
344
766 824
1698 1635
926
505 481403
556
376 376268
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*
Source: Central Bank of Peru, Superintendence of Banks and Indecopi
46,4 44.0
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Jan/
08
May
/08
Sep
/08
Jan/
09
May
/09
Sep
/09
Jan/
10
May
/10
Sep
/10
Jan/
11
May
/11
Sep
/11
Jan/
12
May
/12
Sep
/12
Liquidity Ratio (Percentage)
Domestic Currency Foreign Currency
53 58
61 63 64 65
63 63
67 66
62 64
Jan/08
Apr/08
Jul/0
8
Oct/08
Jan/09
Apr/09
Jul/0
9
Oct/09
Jan/10
Apr/10
Jul/1
0
Oct/10
Jan/11
Apr/11
Jul/1
1
Oct/11
Jan/12
Apr/12
Jul/1
2
Oct/12
Lending Access Index
Dec-‐12
1.00
3.00
5.00
7.00
9.00
11.00
13.00
Jan/97
Jul/9
7 Jan/98
Jul/9
8 Jan/99
Jul/9
9 Jan/00
Jul/0
0 Jan/01
Jul/0
1 Jan/02
Jul/0
2 Jan/03
Jul/0
3 Jan/04
Jul/0
4 Jan/05
Jul/0
5 Jan/06
Jul/0
6 Jan/07
Jul/0
7 Jan/08
Jul/0
8 Jan/09
Jul/0
9 Jan/10
Jul/1
0 Jan/11
Jul/1
1 Jan/12
Jul/1
2
EvoluAon of non performing raAo of banks (In percentage)
16
• These measures can be classified in 2 categories: – Prevention: using non conventional monetary policies
such as reserve requirements to prevent the system from taking excessive risk in a context of low international interest rates and high and persistent capital flows.
– Capacity build-up: accumulating international reserves to ensure the Central Bank has the means to contain exchange rate volatility.
In the aftermath of the crisis, Peru’s Central Bank has been taking precautionary measures to confront the possibility of a reversal in capital flows
17
Now, the Central Bank holds its interest rate at 4,25%. Large reserve requirements on foreign currency liabilities are in place to limit the impact of
capital flows on lending and prevent credit booms.
18
20.0
30.0
00
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
Apr-‐07
Jul-‐0
7Oct-‐07
Jan-‐08
Apr-‐08
Jul-‐0
8Oct-‐08
Jan-‐09
Apr-‐09
Jul-‐0
9Oct-‐09
Jan-‐10
Apr-‐10
Jul-‐1
0Oct-‐10
Jan-‐11
Apr-‐11
Jul-‐1
1Oct-‐11
Jan-‐12
Apr-‐12
Jul-‐1
2Oct-‐12
Jan-‐13
Apr-‐13
1/
Domestic currency reserve ratios(As percentage of total obligations subject to legal requeriments)
Average required Marginal
%
1/ Forecast
43.1
55.0
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Apr-‐0
7Jul-‐0
7Oc
t-‐07
Jan-‐08
Apr-‐0
8Jul-‐0
8Oc
t-‐08
Jan-‐09
Apr-‐0
9Jul-‐0
9Oc
t-‐09
Jan-‐10
Apr-‐1
0Jul-‐1
0Oc
t-‐10
Jan-‐11
Apr-‐1
1Jul-‐1
1Oc
t-‐11
Jan-‐12
Apr-‐1
2Jul-‐1
2Oc
t-‐12
Jan-‐13
Apr-‐13
1/Foreign Currency Reserve Ratios
(As percentage of total obligations subject to legal requeriments)
Average required FC Marginal
%
1/ Forecast
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
Jan-
06M
ar-0
6M
ay-0
6Ju
l-06
Sep-
06No
v-06
Jan-
07M
ar-0
7M
ay-0
7Ju
l-07
Sep-
07No
v-07
Jan-
08M
ar-0
8M
ay-0
8Ju
l-08
Sep-
08No
v-08
Jan-
09M
ar-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
l-09
Sep-
09No
v-09
Jan-
10M
ar-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
l-10
Sep-
10No
v-10
Jan-
11M
ar-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
l-11
Sep-
11No
v-11
Jan-
12M
ar-1
2M
ay-1
2Ju
l-12
Sep-
12No
v-12
Jan-
13M
ar-1
3
Central Bank Policy Rate(percentage)
4,25
The Bank’s balance sheet reflects the NIR build-up policy and prudential fiscal savings
19
Simplified Balance Sheet of the Central Bank(as percentage of Net International Reserves)
Net Assets mar-13I. International Reserves 100%
(US$ 67 918 mills.)Net LiabilitiesII. Public sector deposits 35%
In domestic currency 21%In foreign currency 14%
III. Reserves requirements 28%In domestic currency 12%In foreign currency 1/ 15%
IV. Central Bank's instruments 20%CDs 13%Deposits 7%
V. Currency 17%
VI. Other net liabilities 0%1/ Includes banks' overnight deposits with the Central Bank.
Net international reserves (NIR) are around US$ 68 billion. The high NIR stock greatly enhances Peru’s responsiveness to potential financial external shocks.
20
8.6 9.6 10.2 12.6 14.1 17.3
27.7 31.2 33.1
44.1 48.8
64 68,5
Dec-‐01 Dec-‐02 Dec-‐03 Dec-‐04 Dec-‐05 Dec-‐06 Dec-‐07 Dec-‐08 Dec-‐09 Dec-‐10 Dec-‐11 Dec-‐12 Mar-‐13*
Net InternaAonal Reserves (US$ billions)
2011 2012 2013*
NIR (US$ millions) 48 816 63 991 68 450
NIR / GDP (%) 27,6 32,0 33,3
NIR / Short-‐term debt (# $mes) 5,3 5,8 5,2
NIR / Liquidity (%) 84,0 92,7 99,6
* Peru: as of march 08, 2013, other countries: february 2013
%GDP
Chile 14,7
Brazil 15,5
Mexico 14,2
Colombia 10.6
Argen$na 8,8
Venezuela 8,1
The private sector is in better shape as well: dollarization of the private bond stock has decreased significantly and the participation of bond issues with maturities longer than 5
years has increased…
* Data as of September
4.7
25.4
43.7 48.1
19.2 10.1 9.8 9.8
76.1
64.5
46.5 42.1
2001 2006 2011 2012 Nominal Soles Indexed Soles Dollars
Private Bond Stock by currency (%)
19.2 16.5 15.4 13.2
45.6
27.5 32.0 31.1
35.1
56.0 52.6 55.7
2001 2006 2011 2012 Up to 3 years Between 3 and 5 years More than 5 years
Private Bond Stock by original maturity (%)
21
… and interest rates of private bond issues show a downward trend in both currencies.
11.5
7.1 7.0 6.1
8.0 6.2
5.3 5.5
2001 2006 2011 2012*
Interest rates of private bond issues (%)
Domes$c currency Foreign currency * Data as of September
22
Given the size of the BTP market and the limited participation of domestic financial institutions, the negative impact of higher interest rates can be limited with liquidity
injection policies.
23
1.1 1.5 1.4 1.12.8 2.7 3.4
3.9
5.6 5.2 5.56.5 5.9 6.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
BTP Stock(Percentage of GDP)
Non Resident Resident .
Non Residents56,2%
Pension Funds (AFPs)
29,9%
Banks5,1%
Insurance4,3%
Others4,5%
BTP Holdings by Type -‐ 2012(percentage)
The banking sector is solid as well: Peru’s bank indicators are among the best among LAC countries in profitability, portfolio quality, solvency and operating efficiency.
Source: Na$onal supervisors, IMF
1,11,4 1,5
1,7 1,7
2,2 2,2 2,32,5 2,5
2,7 2,7
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Uru Ven Peru Bol. Par Ecu. Nic. Chil. Col. Mex. Pan. Dom. Rep.
Non performing loans ratio
15,7 15,6 14,8 14,6 14,2 13,3 13,0 13,0 12,7 12,3
9,2 8,8
02468
1012141618
Mex. Pan. Nic. Dom. Rep.
Col. Peru Chil. Ecu. Ven Bol. Par Uru
Regulatory capital ratio
47,4 48,0 50,2 53,1 56,4 56,5 59,4 59,8 62,3 62,771,4
88,1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Chil. Peru Pan. Par Mex. Ven Nic. Ecu. Col. Bol. Dom. Rep.
Uru
Operating Efficiencyoperating expenses / (net financial and non
financial income)
24
• Peru’s experience shows that an appropriate mix of fiscal, monetary and regulatory policy can limit the risks associated with a sudden reversal of capital flows.
• Reserve accumulation can improve the central bank’s response capacity in the event of an adverse shock; and reserve requirement management discourages risk-taking during capital inflow surges.
• The policy response to a capital reversal will depend of the nature of the shock: – An orderly reversal can actually be beneficial, as it can alleviate
demand pressures. – In contrast, the central banks would need to respond to a disorderly
capital reversal using all the tool at its disposal.
Concluding Remarks
25