Upload
vanliem
View
221
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STMicroelectronics
« Trends in high speed, low power Analog to Digital converters »
Laurent Dugoujon
Data-Converters Design Mgr.
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Outline
Introduction/Generalities
ADC challenges
ST ADC products
Power Optimisation
Design views
ADC Trends
Conclusion
STMicroelectronics
Introduction/Generalities
DEFINITIONS
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Analog to Digital Converter (ADC)
ANALOG
INPUT
D0
D3
D2
D1
DIGITAL
OUTPUT
Ex:4 bits A/D converter.
t
analog
input
Sampling
Clock signal
TSA04XX
0000
1111
output
binary
codes
reconstructed
signal
t
010010111…
1
1
1
16 possible output codes
ADC
Full scale amplitude
LSB=Full scale/2N
62mV for 1V/4bits
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
ADC MAIN PARAMETERS
ADC functionality parameters:
– Number of output bits
– Sampling frequency noted FS
– Number of channels
ADC performance parameters:
– Static parameters: DNL, INL
– Dynamic parameters: SNR, SINAD, ENOB, Analog
input bandwidth.
– Power consumption, Area, Package
STMicroelectronics
Generalities
ADC Market, Applications
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
ADC Market
Source:WSTS
ADC, DAC, SWITCHES & MUX
Regions US 42%
Europe 22%
Japan 18%
A/P 16%
Year 2000
– 1.8B$ total value
– 646Mu total volume
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
High Energy Physics Electronic chain
Detector
ADC PA Data
Processor DAQ
DCS
Sensor Signal formating Events acquisition Storage
Control
Analysis…
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Hi-volumes & Hi-tech Applications
Consumer
Audio Industrial
Control
Consumer Video
RF/Military
Sampling Frequency
Nbr. bits
HEP
HEP Detectors
requirements
10
10MHz
+ low Power
+ no. channels
AP
Astro-Physics
Telecom
STMicroelectronics
ADC Challenge
ACCURACY and SPEED?
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Speed-Accuracy coupling
Fundamental relation (Heisenberg):
DE . DT m h/2.p
DE = (LSB/2)2 / R
DT = T/2
Applied to A/D Converter:
R=50 Ohms, 2N.LSB = 1Volt, h=6.626 10-34
2N.Fsamp <= 3.44 1015
ex: 12 bits/840Gsamples/s
Or 18bits/10Gsamples/s
T/2
LSB/2
Vin
Time
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Real signals world
How many Gigabit/s on a wire ?
Today commercial 10Gbit/s with ECL levels
Power, EMI, Integrity loss, Package parasitics,..
Are the limiting factors against higher rates !
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Clock accuracy problems
Generation of Clock signal:
Clock signal is usually the fastest signal of the
acquisition system and determines the sampling
instants:
signal
clock
jitter
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Low-jitter Clock generation
Clock jitter:
It characterizes the Quality of the time reference, often expressed in ps pk-to-pk or rms.
Available generator technologies:
RC + Logic Xtal, VCXO Sp. Plls
Jitter 100-1000ps 10-100ps 0.5-10ps
Cost ~0.1$ ~1$ ~10$
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Clock Quality vs ADC specs
Aperture time and Clock jitter for a Nbit ADC sampling an Analog signal of FIN frequency must be less than:
1/(PI x FIN x 2(N+1) )
In order not to add degradation in the achieved Signal/Noise Ratio.
Example: 10 bit conversion of 10MHz input needs less than 16ps jitter. (good quality Xtal oscillator is OK)
12bit of same 10MHz input needs 4ps max jitter !
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Accuracy/speed
2
4
6
8
10
14
12
16
18
20
22
0
10K 100K 1M 10M 100M 1G 10G 100G
Heisenberg
1ps jitter
Effect. bits
Sample
rate S/s
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Sampling rate trend summary
Today best system clock jitter is 1ps
Corresponding to 12bit resolution of 40MHz input signal
Prototypes ADCs reach 0.5ps aperture time (8bit/1.3GHz)
Going beyond 12bit-40MHz will require sub-ps jitter clock generator preferably integrated to the ADC chip for noise, power and cost reductions.
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Resolution of real conversion systems is limited by the « noise floor » resulting from differents noise sources: thermal noise, transistors intrinsic noise, …
Input-referred noise can be expressed as:
<vn2> = 4 kTReqFs/2
This should be less than Quantization noise that is:
Q2/12, Q=Full scale/2N
Then :
N < Log2{Vfs2/(6kTReqFs)}1/2 – 1
Given a 2Volts full scale and 1000ohms Req, it gives
19bit sampling at 100Ksps (or 16bit at 10Msps)
Resolution Problems
Rnoise
Equiv.
Noiseless
ADC
Req
Vin
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Accuracy/speed
2
4
6
8
10
14
12
16
18
20
22
0
10K 100K 1M 10M 100M 1G 10G 100G
Heisenberg
1Kohm thermal
1ps jitter
Effect. bits
Sample
rate S/s
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
High-speed ADCs ST products & services
TSA0801: 8-bit, single-Channel, 40Msps, 40mW
TSA1001: 10-bit, single-Channel, 25Msps, 35mW
TSA1002: 10-bit, single-Channel, 50Msps, 50mW
TSA1201: 12-bit, single-Channel, 50Msps, 130mW
TSA1203: 12-bit, dual-Channel, 40Msps, 230mW
TSA1204: 12-bit, dual-Channel, 20Msps, 120mW
TSA1005: 10-bits, dual Channel, 40 Msps, 200mW
2.5V supply voltage
TQFP48
+ Evaluation boards, Applications notes, support, IP
integration, consulting…
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
ST ADCs Accuracy/speed
2
4
6
8
10
14
12
16
18
20
22
0
10K 100K 1M 10M 100M 1G 10G 100G
Heisenberg
1Kohm thermal
1ps jitter
Effect. bits
Sample
rate S/s
products
prototypes
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Power optimisation
MeritFig.=2ENOB x Fs / Power ( x 10-11 )
TSA1001
9.7b, 25Msps
35mW
MF=5.9
Closest
competitor
MF=3.2
TSA1002
9.7b, 50Msps
50mW
MF=8.3
Closest
competitor
MF=4.2
TSA1201
10.5b, 50Msps
130mW
MF=5.6
Closest
competitor
MF=4.7
TSA1203 (dual)
10.5b, 40Msps
230mW
MF=5
Closest
competitor
MF=2
Closest competitor
MF=1.2
TSA0801
7.9b, 40Msps
40mW
MF=2.4
ADCs Vsupply=2.5V
Competitors Vsupply= 5V or 3.3V…
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Design architectures
1E+4 1E+5 1E+6 1E+7 1E+8 1E+9
Sampling Frequency (Fs) (Hz)
5
10
15
20
25
30
Re
so
luti
on
(n
)
Sigma Delta
Dual
Slope
Audio
Sensors
Instrumentation
Successive Approximation
Pipelined
Folded
High Speed
Basestation Instrumentation
IF sampling
Flash
Radars,
RF
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Very High Speed ADC (8bits/2Gsps)
Interleaved SAR ADCs
SA ADC 1
SA ADC 24
SA ADC 13
SA ADC 12
V IN 8
8
8
8 M
UX
1
2:1
8 M
UX
1
2:1
8
CO
MP
DAC
S/H
Die: 4mm2, IP: 0.45mm2 24 // unitary SAR ADC
0.18mm CMOS
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Pipelined ADCs
S/H
2bit 2bit
x2 Vi-1 Vi
Digital correction
Output bits
1 pipeline stage
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Folded-cascode Amplifier
pol
inp inm
op
om
vcp
vcn
VDD
GND
Vtp=Vtn=0.7V
2.5V / 0.25mm CMOS
G=90dB
THD=-86dB
BW3dB=100MHz
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
CERN Alice-TPC ALTRO chip
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
7.7 mm
8.3
mm
Data Memory
1K x 40
Pedestal
Memory
1K x 10
Processing
Logic
3.8 mm
12 mm
14.1 mm
TQFP 176
24mm
CERN ALTRO chip: Layout and Package
Process STM HCMOS-7 (0.25 µ)
Area 64 mm2
Dimensions 7.70 × 8.35 mm2
Transistors 6 Million
Embedded Memory 800-Kbit
No. ADCs 16
Supply Voltage 2.5V
Power Consumption 260mW @ 10 MSPS
Package TQFP-176
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
CERN ALTRO ADC results
ENOB vs Sampling Frequency
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
fs (MHz)
EN
OB
ENG RUN (internal resistor - 90KW)
MPW (external resistor - 20KW)
ENOB vs Signal Frequency
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
fin (MHz)E
NO
B
ENG RUN (internal resistor - 90KW)
MPW (external resistor - 20KW)
MAX sampling rate in the TPC BW at PASA output
TPC requirement: ENOB > 9
2.5
kW
kW
kW
kW
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Power and ENOB
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 10 100 1000
Rpol (kW)
bits
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
mW
90 kW
12 mW
9.7
ADC Operating Point
Effective Number of Bits
Power Consumption per Channel
ADC Power Consumption
20 kW
30 mW
MPW values
Engineering Run values
Measured Analogue Power Consumption: 80 mA
(st.dev = 1.12 mA)
12.5 mW / channel
Optimised ADC power in ALTRO
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
CERN ALTRO spectrum analysis
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
f (MHz)
dB
c
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
f (MHz)
dB
c
Without Readout Clock With Readout Clock
HD2 HD3
HD2 HD3
RDO
clock
HD4 HD4
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
INPUT SIGNAL AFTER 1st BASELINE CORRECTION
AFTER TAIL CANCELLATION AFTER 2nd BASELINE CORRECTION
ALTRO chip: Digital Processor Performance
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
ADC Trends Resolution-Speed
Paralelism to exploit technology intrinsic speed of successive generations technology (X2 every 2years)
Intensification of integrated Digital Post-processing
Number of channels
Lower core sizes and power will allow higher integration
Associated Functions
Internal Clock re-generation will appear, Built-In-Self-Test,…
Power
New low-voltage cells/architectures for 1V technology on the way…
Packages
Parasitics and size reduction associated to better dissipation
LECC2002 9-13 September 2002, Colmar-France
Conclusions
ADCs are used in many applications
HEP is not so specific in terms of need
Application Environment can degrades ADC perf.
High Merit-figure ADC design needs large efforts
Multi-ADCs integration is a powerfull path
Digital integration is the same natural path
We will use Moore’s law to buy resolution.speed