Upload
lucas-ballard
View
218
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Third Party Ownership of PV for Affordable
Housing DeWitt Jones
Boston Community Capital
Green Homes and Sustainable Communities 2008 August 7, 2008
BCC Energy AdvantageProgram Goals
Materially improve net operating income of financially at-risk affordable housing developments through renewable energy and energy conservation
Create market-based financing system for renewable energy and energy conservation in affordable housing developments
Connect low income communities to emerging green trends
Project Impacts for Affordable Housing Reduce increases and volatility of utility
expenses (fix utility costs) Stabilize properties’ financial structure Improve current financing and re-financing
options Improve building performance and comfort Lower current utility costs ?
Target Benchmarks
Replace 30-40% of current electricity load with RE
Reduce 33% of current electricity load through conservation and efficiency
Reduce 25% of current heat/DHW load through conservation and efficiency
Reduce 33% of current water use through conservation
Challenges for Existing Properties to Make Capital Investments Don’t have sufficient capital Cannot take on additional debt Little confidence that savings will be achieved
Who maintains system? First cost limitations High transaction costs Don’t attract best partners
PV realities
Not Economic Affordable housing cannot pay above market Requires significant subsidies Small systems—little impact Hard to capture tax credits and environmental
attributes revenue Limited aggregation opportunities Better economic alternatives
Third Party Ownership Benefits Simple, inexpensive for hosts Creates opportunity for market not served
Non profit, fragmented market Captures tax benefits Monetizes attributes
Sustainable, scalable business Each party does its own thing Market pricing for all parties Incents long term performance
Third Party Ownership
Selects, designs, installs and owns PV panels on host’s property
Sells solar electricity to host through PPA Services and maintains system Provides all financing Captures tax and attributes benefits Benefits from aggregation and volume
Third Party Ownership Parties PPA Developer—finds projects & partners Solar Contractor—installs system Properties/Hosts-purchases electricity Finance/Lessor—finances system, tax O&M Provider—services & guarantees PV PV or RE incentive—subsidies Attributes markets—additional revenue
Third Party Barriers for Affordable Housing Current PPA providers too busy with better
deals—size, multiple owners, sites, states Solar and energy finance companies don’t
trust affordable housing or PBI Housing owners don’t trust technology Tax and legal structure barriers for non-
profits Complex Better alternatives
Current Mass Affordable Housing PV 100% capital subsidy Approximate $9/watt Small systems—under 50 kW (often 10-20) Marginal impact on operating budget Expensive servicing and DAS Program ended Different results for some new construction
Third Party Ownership for PV
Solar ITC and Bonus depreciation Benefits from aggregation Optimizes property selection Aligns performance and economics Minimizes two-tiered subsidy for affordable
housing Discrete and detachable system Allows unfamiliar parties to work together
BCC Solar Energy Advantage
Design third party financing system for affordable housing
$3.5-4 million PV incentive funds from MTC Signed 5 PPAs with one in process 1 Megawatt of Capacity—20% of Mass Solar Approximate $4 watt incentive 16% to 64% of load Largest (380kW) roof top PV in Mass
BCC SEA Phase I Projects
Property Location Units Size kW % of load
Mishawum Charlestown 337 392.0 15%
Washington Elms Cambridge 145 92.1 30%
North Village Webster 132 156.4 44%
Riverview Pittsfield 120 198.7 34%
Walden Square* Cambridge 244 76.9 64%
Crossway* Lee 38 110.5 50%
TOTAL 1016 1,026.7 26%**
Third Party Ownership—BCC SEA PPA Developer & Provider
Built legal structure Selected projects and partners
Received PV incentive and structured as production incentive
Provide credit support for properties to investor
Eliminated capital & technical risks for hosts Eliminated payment risk for investor
Financing Structure
BCC SEA Capitalize with $3.5-4 million from incentive funds Released as PBI per kWh $2 million in additional credit support for PPA Profitable over 20 years
Revenue PPA—$.16/kWh PBI--$.65/kWh (7 years) REC & FCM--$.05/kWh
Finance Partner
Investment & Structure Sale/leaseback at placed-in-service 7 year lease with buyout in year 7 Market return, tax credit compliant
Risks covered PBI revenue covered by incentive funds PPA revenue covered by BCC SEA credit support Trusts technology and O&M guarantee
Benefits for Host Properties
Pays for electricity at or below today’s cost for 20 years with 1.25% escalator
Only pays for electricity generated Fixes 40% of electric costs No capital or balance sheet impact Minimal transaction and operating costs Option to purchase system at years 8, 14, 20
Impact on PV Incentive Programs Approximately $3.50/ watt or less
Should go down with second round Half of typical cost for housing projects
Serves market otherwise unserved Close to cost for large commercial projects Supports generation, not installation All parties make money—sustainable model
Benefits to other parties
PV Installer volume lower marketing costs
O&M provider Volume and concentration incentive to exceed targets
Others Lawyers Accountants
Estimated Pricing Impacts
Capital Savings Tax advantages-more than 30% savings Aggregation—10% Correct building selection—10%
Revenue increases System performance—better than 10% Correct building and system design—10% Attributes market—7% Monitoring costs—5%
Mishawum Park
Charlestown neighborhood of Boston 337 unit resident-owned facility Rescued and redeveloped by residents No syndication 100% low income Very high utility costs with owner paying all
utility costs 392 kW
Mishawum Park, Boston, MA
Mishawum Park
392 kW system largest rooftop solar installation in MA third largest PV system in all of New York
and New England largest PPA ever signed in New England for
any type of facility. largest PPA signed for an affordable housing
development in country
Impacts for Mishawum
Reduced volatility in electric costs Covers at least 16% of very high load Saves $1 million if electricity prices double
over 20 years (have doubled in last 5 years) Current savings if prices doubled equal to
resident services budget Receives future benefits from time-of-use or
demand pricing Not otherwise available
Challenges
ITC Incentives—not sustainable or reliable Getting owners to say yes Net metering and interconnection Long term operating risks Regulatory rules—offsite, utility companies Best use of subsidies?
Why do solar
Offers hedge for future, reduces volatility Improving economics Shift towards time-of-use pricing Expanding subsidy and environmental
attributes for solar Gateway to other investments/systems Innovation and market participation will leave
low income communities behind
DeWitt JonesBCC Solar Energy Advantage
Boston Community Capital56 Warren Street, Boston, MA 02119
www.bostoncommunitycapital.org