Upload
juniper-fowler
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BSF – a journey not
an eventWhat is your destination ?
BSF Continuum of creativity & innovation
Strategy for
change
Strategy for
change
Change ManagementChange Management
Cu
rren
t ou
tsta
nd
ing
pra
ctic
e C
urre
nt o
uts
tan
din
g p
ractic
e
OBCOBC
Readiness to
deliver
Readiness to
deliver
ProcurementProcurement
LEP Future focussed projects LEP Future focussed projects
Lon
g te
rm v
isio
n – N
ever re
ach
ab
le?
Lon
g te
rm v
isio
n – N
ever re
ach
ab
le?
Collective Partnership Targets and KPIs
Educationally led design : immersive, leading edge technology.
A whole school culture of innovation
Senior team planning for
innovation
Senior team planning for
innovationNational Policy, Social context, history,
research, current capacity
Identify key stakeholders and begin to
prepare representation of these
EnvisioningEnvisioning
Deliverables
‘BEST’ Vision‘BEST’ Vision
Case studiesCase studies Ideas SorterIdeas Sorter
Workshops
DebateDebate
Innovation teamsInnovation teams
ImplementationImplementation
EvaluationEvaluation
Sign off of ideas phase Sign off of ideas phase
Innovation delivery TeamsInnovation delivery Teams
Resources and PrioritiesResources and Priorities
Evaluation of first 6 months Evaluation of first 6 months
‘Lea
rner
Vis
ion
‘Lea
rner
Vis
ion
‘3 Id
eas
post
ers
‘3 Id
eas
post
ers
Context Stakeholders
Plan
Do
Review
Stakeholder landscape
Add and/or subtract stakeholder groups required for consultation in your community.
Parents Community leaders Teachers
Learners Student councils Sponsors
Police Destination schools Feeder schools
Local residents Alumni Web community
Local businesses Local government School advisors
Define subsets of any of the above Local charities Senior Management
Inclusion practices
Inclusion Practice Explanation
DelegatedResponsibility is given to a stakeholder group and their plan is accepted. ( We
would be cautious of such an approach)
Co - developedThe development of ideas is shared
equally. Both parties have equal opportunity to influence the final solution
Consulted and debated
Stakeholders are consulted before a plan is written up then this plan is opened up
for debate in an open meeting
Consulted Stakeholders are consulted
InformedStakeholders are kept informed about the
process with no clear way of them becoming involved
Envisioning
What is your destination ?
Some Possible Routes
T-Route P-Route• Teacher Led• Knowledge ‘delivered’• Learners consume
media• Competitive• Teacher assessed• Distinct from informal• Pace of the class• Single course• Predominant learning
style• Restricted age range• Personalised by
teacher
• Learner Led• Knowledge created• Learners produce
media• Communities of
learning• Peer and Self
Assessment• Formal, informal
continuum• Individualised
challenges• Multiple pathway• Choice of approach• Peer and multi age
working• Personalised by choice
The T-route Model
Teacher
Knowledge
Teacher Training
Delivery model
Teacher
Knowledge
Teacher Training
Delivery m
odel
Resources
Content C
reation
Teacher selected content
Teacher
Knowledge
Teacher Training
Guided
Resources
Content C
reation
User selected content ?
Learning
Environment
Knowledge
The P-route Model
User
generated
content
Knowledge
TeacherInput stimulus,
guidance, direction,
opportunities
Research outcomes,
analysis, conclusion
Continuous improvement
Pulling in the same direction Incremental changes in
the right direction are ‘Transformational’
Time(Years)
Starting point for example school
SRF Measure of e-Confidence
Near-term Visions
5 (lowest)
4
3
2
1 (highest)
T-route P-route
Some school processes or practice may fall anywhere on the
spectrum; however, from operational efficiency
perspective, a school pursues one route or the other
P1 and T1 describe model schools with a standard of ICT equipment matching the PfS output specification
Future Visions (‘moving targets’)
T1 P1
P2
P2 and T2 describe ‘moving targets’ at the end of the the longer-term vision. Schools will be using more advanced ICT.
T2 P2
0
4
5
10
15
Outcome
Learner Outcomes
Teacher Outcomes
Community outcomes
Envisioning Task
1. Decide which of the three categories you would like to work on.
2. Imagine it is the year 2030 and you are giving an international presentation about the
most outstanding practice in your country
3. What would this success look like?
4. You can base it on the outcomes shown here or create your own.
5. Add your ideas to post-its and stick on the flip charts provided.
Whole school / group visionFuture Vision Vote
Learner
Teacher
Community
Size of the Building
How big will your new school be ?
Likely floor areaTaken from BB98 (building bulletin 98)
Typical human space allowances
• Standard teaching space = 1.8 square metres per child
• Practical or lab space = 2.5 square metres per child
• Total teaching space requirement (including timetable redundancy ) = 3.3 square metres per child.
• Circulation space = 25% - 30% of net
Key Decisions
Dictating form and function
Task 2 - Justify from your vision
Key Theory Y/N? Brief descriptions
Human Scale Education research Create houses to ensure groups < 90
Unisex / Universal Toilets Single room toilets with basin for staff and student
Service Learning All services can be run by students
Performance / Praise media All work will be displayed / performed
Cultural and historic identity Impact and community acceptance for belonging
Co-location / Community ZoningSports, Medical, Library, Ideas stores, Care homes, Other phases, SEN, light
mechanical, conference facilities, community theatre, Children’s services
Greater funding may be possible to attract for co-location. Each co-located service offers new learning and collaborative opportunities as well as economies of scale. In smaller communities the school may be the main employer and hub.
Sustainable / Eco School Location of ‘green’ measures
1:1 device ratios – Smart building Infrastructure and convergence towards IP
Micro - society Outside community reflected in the building
Space diversity No two spaces the same to permit diversity
Pupil professionalism (staff areas?) If staff have it then students have it.
Corridor removal and outside spaces The need for corridors should be removed – central street and social hub ideas can be used.
Specialism / Merit structures ? Teaching specialism dictates design.
Room 13 (Scotland)1 /5
4 /5TW, IE, Cr, SM, EP
1 /5
10 Replica projects 5 years after set up
LOW (Costs are for spare room and adult minder plus budget for children to
manage)
Teacher = smaller classLearners = choice and responsibility
Self-directed room for children who finish their work
early
Ingenium (London, UK)
Children decide the rules: Teachers have to follow
them in one high quality classroom. Teachers book
in to the room if they choose. Children review the
rules each 6 weeks.
2 /5Projector, Wireless laptop,
video, sound
4 /5TW, IE, Cr, SM, EP, RL
4 /5 Time allowed for pupil discussion
1 Replica projects 5 years after set up
MEDIUM (Quality venue for status with no essential timetabling)
Teacher = Good working environmentLearners = involvement, valued, working
environment.
Micro-Society (Japan & USA)
Children manage real jobs – running the school,
including radio station
1 /5TV station and Radio station
5 /5TW, IE, Cr, SM, EP, RL
4 /5 Ongoing re-instatement and negotiation
20 Replica projects 5 years after set up
LOW (Quality venue for status with no essential timetabling)
Teacher = None additionalLearners = involvement, valued, genuine experience, responsibility, progression.
Broadclyst (UK)
All work is electronic through teacher presentation
and lecture
4 /5Personal PC 1:1, supporting
peripherals
2 /5IE, SM
3 /5 Initial change in practice
10 Replica projects 5 years after set up
HIGH (3 classes combined so funds can be directed to ICT )
Teacher = Considerable support and control, attractive pay
Learners = personal pace through materials.
Kunskapsskolan (Sweden)
Children agree goals with their tutor at the start of
the week and then negotiate the timetable required
to achieve them
2 /5Not essential but highly useful
5 /5 Outcomes tend to be subject based but could be
competence based also
5 /5 Role of the tutor is essential as is the content providers
53 Replica projects 5 years after set up
MEDIUM – lots of choice of space
Teacher = Less planning and markingLearners = Responsibility, pace, personal
ownership, reflective learning
Eggbuckland (UK)
Children receive teacher training and deliver the
curriculum to each other
5 /5Permanent access to
equipment on request
5 /5 Using PbyP to capture progress
5 /5 Power balance is a critical factor
3 Replica projects 5 years after set up
HIGH (1:1 access, initially effective now actual )
Teacher = Less planning and markingLearners = Responsibility, pace, personal
ownership, reflective learning
Also Washington Project
( International – less ICT)
High Tech High (USA)
Every Learner has a hot-desk facility and office
environment to work in. Most learning by allocated
assignment.
Learner finds resources.
4 /5Permanent access to
equipment via hotdesk
3 /5 Using methods to capture progress
1 /5 Teachers find adapting easy
5 Replica projects 5 years after set up
HIGH (1:1 access, new building design )
Teacher = Efficient resource and project management
Learners = Responsibility, pace, personal ownership.
Hole in the Wall ( India )
ICT is simply made available to learners in their
social and recreation times.
Tasks begin to refer to information found this way
2 /5Computers required at small
ratios
4 /5 Skills are highly praised assessed by outcome
1 /5 Viral
5 Replica projects 5 years after set up
LOW ( budgets for teams to create resources )
Teacher = Less time producing resources and tasks
Learners = Ownership and shared responsibility
Pudsey Grangefield ( UK )
Dynamic timetable, all rooms are different. Students
look at airport-style LCD screens to find out the
location of their next classroom.
Child as professional learner
2 /5Computers are not key to the
project except display
1 /5 Not the subject of the case study
2 /5 Staff must accept that they don’t have their own room
and must be as flexible as the students
? Completed in September with no known copy yet but good
initial indicators
MEDIUM ( Internal display strategy and dynamic input )
Teacher = Greater match of space to activity
Learners = Feeling of being professional and trusted “feels like you are at
university”
Knowledge Park ( Singapore )
Students take up a learning podule, the higher up
the harder the content.
0 /5Computers are not key to the
project except display
1 /5 Not the subject of the case study
1 /5 Staff must accept that they don’t have their own room
and must be as flexible as the students
5 Now copied extensively
LOW ( Cushions ! )
Teacher = NoneLearner = role modelling
Task 2 - Justify from your vision
Key Theory Y/N? Brief descriptions
Human Scale Education research Create houses to ensure groups < 90
Unisex / Universal Toilets Single room toilets with basin for staff and student
Service Learning All services can be run by students
Performance / Praise media All work will be displayed / performed
Cultural and historic identity Impact and community acceptance for belonging
Co-location / Community ZoningSports, Medical, Library, Ideas stores, Care homes, Other phases, SEN, light
mechanical, conference facilities, community theatre, Children’s services
Greater funding may be possible to attract for co-location. Each co-located service offers new learning and collaborative opportunities as well as economies of scale. In smaller communities the school may be the main employer and hub.
Sustainable / Eco School Location of ‘green’ measures
1:1 device ratios – Smart building Infrastructure and convergence towards IP
Micro - society Outside community reflected in the building
Space diversity No two spaces the same to permit diversity
Pupil professionalism (staff areas?) If staff have it then students have it.
Corridor removal and outside spaces The need for corridors should be removed – central street and social hub ideas can be used.
Specialism / Merit structures ? Teaching specialism dictates design.
Innovation Teams
Teachers will drive the changes needed.
Conditions for success
• All P-route systems are based on 21st Century Skills and competencies
• In order to innovate, teachers must be able to measure baselines and improvements in these competencies.
• Teacher action research and reflection provide the conditions for success
Self-Managers
Effective Participators
Creative Thinkers
Reflective Learners
Independent Enquirers
Team Workers
PLTs - Core set 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
St Be Organised E Go for it, finish itC Manage RiskS Manage EmotionsC Take ResponsibilityE Build the teamSt Manage the TeamS Evaluate the TeamE Identify an IssueC Find SolutionsSt Persuade othersS Get InvolvedS Explore a QuestionSt Evaluate EvidenceE Stay ObjectiveC Reach ConclusionsC ImagineSt Make LinksS Question AssumptionsE Take Creative RisksC Set Your ChallengesSt Plan-Do-ReviewE Invite FeedbackS Share learning
The PbyP framework KS3-5
Functional Skills 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Making sense of situationsCalculating / AnalysingInterpreting and ComunicatingDiscussionPresenting to an AudienceComparing / combining sourcesWritingUse ICTFind and select information using ICTPresent, process develop with ICT
networked intelligence
Reliable peer assessmentWhat to use for goals?
Lifelong competencies
Arranged in Skills Ladders
Clear progression up a ladder
Can be understood and evidenced by the
learner
Learning
Environment
Knowledge
The P-route Model
User
generated
content
Knowledge
TeacherInput stimulus,
guidance, direction,
opportunities
Research outcomes,
analysis, conclusion
Continuous improvement
Making the vision happen
‘Learner BEST outcome 1
TRANSFORMATION :
Whole school progression toward the long term vision with the involvement of all its staff, students and other key
stakeholders.
Innovation Team 1
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Innovation Team 2 Innovation Team 3 Innovation Team 4 Innovation Team 5 Innovation Team 6
‘Learner BEST outcome 2 ‘Learner BEST outcome 3
Managing Risk
When you took over the leadership
You crack eggs ! Your initiatives
have yet to bear fruit. People
complain it was better before – and
it was!
Time
People have understood the vision and it is
widely shared – initiatives have kicked in and
are achieving change
Su
ccess
You are reaching the Good phase.
Most things are in place
Results begin to plateau
Wide Support and good will
Identify new project while energy is high
Innovation and Risk Taking referring to the new vision for
direction
Stop doing some things to make space for the new – don’t
be afraid to let go.
Task
• From your vision statements we took key decisions for the structure of the school
• Now we must identify key areas in which we wish to drive innovation today to set up the conditions for change required
• Which innovations currently taking place in your school are in line with your vision and likely to scale. If there are none can you identify one you will start and who would be the innovation team ?
Adjacencies
How will the school operate?
Example adjacency model
Central
Resource Area
House 1
House 2
House 3C
ate
rin
g
Indoor Sports
facilities
EntranceTheatre
Public Zone
Kitchens
Student Swipe card zone
Example adjacency model
Faculty based model is shown
With generic overlay it appears
that the social areas of dining
and peer performance are not at
the heart of the building
Media Arts
Tech
nica
l
Gen
era
l
Teach
ing
Fuelled by inspiration, personal choice and personal needs. Recognising that the value of a community is in the diversity, creativity, relationships and peer respect.
Supported by a range of advisors, mentors and teachers: The learner is at the centre. They are empowered by choices and the advice of many others.
Research led, open, collaborative, safe to fail and experiment : Learning research informs us and is an active human process in which new knowledge occurs through individuals sharing and developing ideas and concepts with others
Success understood by the learner. Evidenced, shared and praised : If learners drive the process, assessment and objectives are owned and If learning is driven by inspiration and developed in communities then sharing is as essential as the recognition of progression.
Fuelled by inspiration, personal
choice and personal needs.
Supported by a range of advisors,
mentors and teachers:
Research led, open,
collaborative, safe to fail and
experiment :
Success understood by the learner.
Evidenced, shared and praised :
Fundamental Principles of learning. Learning should be…
‘It is a fabulous school to be in. A buzzy place but it feels quiet because you can see everywhere. It feels open and has that atmosphere of learning,
‘In Science we have mini break-out suites for students to do extended work, but these are in transparent areas so I can still monitor them through the glass walls. It is really promoting their independent learning skills.
Research led, open,
collaborative, safe to fail and
experiment :
We require spaces where…
Research led, open,
collaborative, safe to fail and
experiment :
Success understood by the learner.
Evidenced, shared and praised :
Sharing Learning
‘We take our laptops out into the flexible spaces to work in groups and come back together to make multi-media presentations of our findings to the rest of the class’
• The street is full of children’s art work and the art classes have walkabout lessons doing critiques of the work on display. The students are responding really positively to the new environment; it’s very refreshing!
Success understood by the learner.
Evidenced, shared and praised :
Sharing Learning
Success understood by the learner.
Evidenced, shared and praised :
Spaces to inspire learning.
Fuelled by inspiration, personal
choice and personal needs.
Fuelled by inspiration, personal
choice and personal needs.
Bremer :‘We are moving out of the
classrooms into both indoor and outdoor
space. The playground, which used to be just
a mucking about zone, is now a learning
space with a work map, timeline, river course
and chessboard. I took a class out there and
we enacted the growth of the British Empire
on the map, checking events against the
timeline.
Forest Hill: in art we have produced huge
canvasses recording the building under
construction, the staircases are analysed in
terms of engineering…
Spaces to inspire learning
Teacher Pupil relationship
Fuelled by inspiration, personal
choice and personal needs.
Supported by a range of advisors,
mentors and teachers:
Supported by a range of advisors,
mentors and teachers: ‘
Bremer: The LRC has a series of breakout rooms, too
where we can teach specific groups or encourage group
work: these spaces are helping us personalize education
for the children.
As a teacher I have become much more of a facilitator
and guide’
Kelmscott: Openness of the building has built trust
between adults and students. Students own the social
spaces and use them unsupervised in a mature way
Teacher Pupil relationship
Community Focus
Kelmscott School
Old EntranceNew Entrance
Kelmscott: ‘Community engagement has improved significantly.
The community is coming in. We are sharing our new Performing Arts facilities
with the community and with other schools.
Bremer: As part of our strategy for improving outcomes for children and families
and workforce reform we have created Student Services which occupies an entire
wing of the school.
Final Task
• Construct your own adjacencies model
• Identify how and where the ‘key messages’ of your project will be expressed
Questions and Answers
Team roles
The Leader
( takes responsibility and volunteers )
The Coach
(builds the team especially talents and
skills)
The Manager
( Manages the team especially
deadlines and roles )
The Motivator
( Praises the team and eventually
evaluates )
A leadership curriculum
Structured activities for primary and secondary classrooms to introduce Belbin style group structures
Levels 1-3: Classroom based team working activities
Level Minimum Description
1 10 Minutes
The team completes a ten minute activity. They help each other, respect each other, praise each other and listen to each other.
2 20 Minutes
All level 1 plus… the team completes a 20 minute activity that requires them to discuss and agree rules, and produce a feeling of team
spirit or shared goals.
3 60 Minutes
All level 2 plus… the team can use a formal meeting to agree roles in the team. Team members are open, co-operative and look after each
other.
Task ideas1 2 3
Take Responsibili
ty
I volunteer for jobs.I can work out rules in games or in teams. I can take turns and share the different jobs
I have put together a team of four and we had our first meeting. We agreed jobs for each of us. We worked out some rules we would all have to follow to make it fair. I have kept to what I agreed.
Build Team Strengths
I understand that people should show respect to each other. They should listen to what they say and look after each other.
I take into account the needs of others. I can tell if someone is sad or happy and I can check they are OK. I know what people are good at and what makes them feel happy.
When I work together in a team I make sure everyone is heard by sticking up for them or inviting them to speak. I help to make sure everyone gets the jobs they want to do OR are best at. My evidence will come from other team members explaining how I supported them.
Manage the Team
I help people who are finding work hard.
I help people in my team so that our whole team does really well
I make sure everyone in our team knows what they need to be doing and if they look like they are running out of time I help them myself or ask others to help them.
Evaluate the
Team
I can say 'well done' to other people when they have done something well.
In my team I can praise each person for something they did really well. They would agree with me.
I can praise each person in my team of 4 using their names and I can tell what I did well that helped the team and what I did badly?
A leadership curriculum
Structured activities for primary and secondary classrooms to introduce Belbin style group structures
Levels 4-6: Learner-led team projects and services
Level Minimum Description
4 2 Weeks All level 3 plus…the team offer a service that requires them to reliably perform a task each day for two weeks without prompting or support.
5 6 WeeksAll level 4 plus…the team comes up with the service themselves and
evaluate their own effectiveness in delivering the service.
6 6 WeeksAll level 5 plus…the team are commissioned to run their project or
service and respond to the tender which will have resources or a budget attached.
Task ideas4 5 6
Take Responsibili
ty
I have led in a team where I have a daily role. I have remembered to do my job every day and sometimes when someone else in the team is away I have done their job without being told to. My team and I decided on the different roles and who should do them. We change roles sometimes..
I lead a team of people who offer a service, run a club or event or do a job together. Everyone has very clear roles and I can explain what they are. We agreed the roles together and I have done mine well and not let people down. As evidence I could explain what our team will be doing, who does what role and how we decided on these. I could share my thoughts and concerns about what could go wrong and how I would deal with it.
I have led a team of 4 people or small company and have been in control of a budget. When I set up the team we negotiated roles and now everyone is clear on their roles and what tasks they personally need to do for the team to succeed. If there is an issue, complaint or if people have an argument in the team I will get involved and take responsibility for making sure it is sorted out fairly. I personally know what all the team members are
working on at the moment.
Build Team Strengths
For level 4 you need evidence that you can put yourself in other people’s position and see THE SAME argument from two different sides. When two people are arguing can you understand both points of view. For evidence you could re-enact or explain when you used this skill to solve an argument in your team.
I have evidence that I can MIRROR. This is about listening to someone and reflecting their feelings back to them. I may use examples of times when I felt the same. I know I have mirrored well if the person recognises themselves in what I say. I can evidence doing this on video or explain when I used it to make people feel more listened to in my team.
I have found examples of the hundreds of tiny things that effect people every day. For negative examples a snigger when someone is sharing how they feel or looking away when they are half way through a sentence. For positive examples a pat on the arm, smiles, questions about how they are, remembering something that they said etc. I have found examples of these and can explain how they have helped to build or
damage my team.
Manage the Team
I make sure that everyone in our team knows what our team targets are. I keep the group on task. For evidence I could let you see a plan I have made that shows who is supposed to do what and by when OR a video/ audio of me getting the team working.
I produce project plans that show what everyone in the team should be doing and what their deadlines are. I organise meetings to discuss the plan and make sure everyone is clear about what they need to do. My evidence needs to include the plan and something about how the meetings have helped.
In a project that lasts for at least six weeks I have negotiated SMART weekly targets for each member of the team. Our meetings review the plan and make sure everyone is on task and meeting deadlines. We provide a good service that is value for money and reliable
because of the team and my management of it.
Evaluate the
Team
When someone in my team has a complaint about me, I listen to what they have to say, make lots of eye contact and see if I can agree with anything. I thank them and don't get cross. I praise each person in my team very specifically (say exactly how and what they did well) and am honest and open about exactly what I have done well and badly.
I can look at the whole team and suggest ways we could all work together better using positive suggestions. If I think there is a problem, I can only raise it if I have a suggestion. Evidence could be an evaluation of how well the team has met its targets and why or how well the team delivers its service.
People who have worked together on a big project need people to appreciate them. At the end of a project I produced a report/presentation/video that shares our successes with people outside our team and also makes the team feel proud of the work they have achieved. It
must also hint at improvements needed for next time?
Level 4 examples
• A team of four, offer a service for just two weeks then they walk away.
• The service requires them to organise themselves as a team to ensure the service is provided daily
• Someone monitors if the service is carried out effectively.
• Eg – A team of four offer Reception duty services – checked by receptionist
• A team of four are responsible for keeping a corridor clean for two weeks – checked by cleaning staff
Level 5 examples• Level 5 requires teams to
devise a project over six weeks that will improve the community for others or offer a service
• Currently used in PbyP schools for…– Student led buddy systems– Student led shops and
library– Student led seminars and
clubs– Student TV– Managing ICT rooms– Developing infant ICT
training programme
Task ideas4
Take Responsibility
I have led in a team where I have a daily role. I have remembered to do my job every day and sometimes when someone else in the team is away I have done their job without being told to. My team and I decided on the different roles and who should do them. We change roles sometimes..
Build Team
Strengths
For level 4 you need evidence that you can put yourself in other people’s position and see THE SAME argument from two different sides. When two people are arguing can you understand both points of view. For evidence you could re-enact or explain when you used this skill to solve an argument in your team.
Manage the
Team
I make sure that everyone in our team knows what our team targets are. I keep the group on task. For evidence I could let you see a plan I have made that shows who is supposed to do what and by when OR a video/ audio of me getting the team working.
Evaluate the Team
When someone in my team has a complaint about me, I listen to what they have to say, make lots of eye contact and see if I can agree with anything. I thank them and don't get cross. I praise each person in my team very specifically (say exactly how and what they did well) and am honest and open about exactly what I have done well and badly.
Some examples of opportunities1. The ‘St Lawrence School’ wrist bands.2. Oswestry homework replacement.3. Radstock news editor4. Carn Gwaval project teams5. Pearl Hyde’s environmental area6. Isles of Scilly extended reception duty teams.7. Bealings Commissioning8. Serlby transition project9. Numerous schools – peer teaching projects10.Numerous schools – extended project linked to a
final presentation.