Upload
duongdien
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine – Danube
Corridor study
Experience from the Corridor
Planning in SEE and
tasks of a planner
Karl Matousek, iC consulenten Vienna, 5th Nov 2015
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau2
Structure of the presentation
(1) What… are the characteristics of the Rhine Danube Corridor
� Conclusions from the evaluation of 1st phase
(2) What…shall be reached until 2030?
� Objectives
(3) Where… is the Rhine-Danube Corridor and where do we stand now?
� Infrastructure alignment of the RD Corridor
� Status quo: infrastructure conditions, bottlenecks and critical issues
(4) How… could the objectives be reached?
� How to solve the critical issues: Assessment of projects
� Need for action to reach the objective of 2030
(5) Experiences as planner in SEE
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
WHAT?
… are the characteristics of the Rhine Danube Corridor
Conclusions from the 1st phase of the study on the R-D Corridor
3
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Situation of the corridor at a glance (general)
� The corridor connects 9 Member States and 4 Third Countries
� The corridor provides the priority transport infrastructure for 90m inhabitants in the EU Member States and for 110m
inhabitants (including Third Countries)
� The regional GDP of EU Member States is 1757.7 bn EUR;
� The regional GDP of all corridor countries is 1825 bn EUR.
� Close cooperation with the EU Strategy for the Danube
Region and the RFC 7 and 9
�Keeping the TEN-T and CEF Guidelines in mind
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TMS demand drivers
� Population on the corridor:
• Centred in urban nodes; DE: large number of urban areas.
� In future socio-demographic pattern will not change.
• Population decline expected for DE, HU,
RO, SK, except strongly urbanised areas.
• Modest population growth expected for AT, the Strasbourg area and CZ.
� GDP forecast for the corridor
• 1 and 2% GDP growth per year in terms of GDP in current prices.
• Existing economic difference/gap between
the eastern and western part of the corridor will not bridged by 2030.
2012 FR (Alsace)
DE (BW)
DE (Ba-
varia)
AT CZ SK HU HR RO BG BK RS MD UA (O-
dessa)
TOTAL
Population
[M people] 1.8 10.8 12,6 8.4 10.5 5.4 10.0 4.4 19.0 7.3 3.9 7.1 3.1 5.9 110.2
GDP [bn
EUR]53.6 389.5 465.5 309.9 156.2 69.1 97.7 43.9 132.6 39.7 14.9 28.7 5.5 18.1 1,824.9
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TMS freight transport baseline
� Current modal split:
58% for road, 28% rail and 14% IWT.
� Growth rates: The traffic of the Eastern part of the corridor has higher growth rates. Yet the existing situation of Western high volumes is expected to maintain.
� International traffic (import, exports and transit) is expected to grow
in all forecasts. This creates a higher opportunity for intermodal operations.
� In baseline scenarios Freight always has to compete with roads current dominant position:
• Most national scenarios assume a continuation of trends and do not assume a specific
modal shift. These assumptions are beneficial for road transport.
• The infrastructure developments are taken into account in different scenarios, but in no study a full implementation of the work plan is assumed.
� Forecasts indicate that implementing rail and IWT projects
do improve modal share.
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
WHAT?… shall be reached until 2030?
Objectives and requirements
7
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T Objectives for European Added Value
•Accessibility
•Infrastructure quality
•Interconnection of flows
•Balanced infrastructure
Cohesion
•Continuity of long distance flows
•Interoperability
•Intermodality
•Economic efficiency
•Innovation
Efficiency
•Long term sustainability
•Clean transport
•Low-carbon transportSustainability
•Meeting users’ needs
•Safety and security
•Risk resilience
•Establishment of requirements
•Accessibility of persons w. red. mobility
Increasing users' benefits
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau9
Corridor requirements by 2030
Rail IWW Road Ports
Maritime and Inland
Waterways
Airport
Core network to be electrified by 2030
Preserved good
navigation status
either an express
road or a motorway
by 2030
Core ports to be connected to rail by 2030
Connection to rail
network (heavy rail or urban rail system) and road network
Certain airports shall be connected to
heavy rail by 2050
Core network to be equipped with ERTMS by 2030
Compliance withECMT class IV (or
higher)
e.g. draught: ≥ 2.50m
Sufficient and safe parking areas at least every 100 km, by 2030
Most important Motorways of the
Sea connections
Core freight lines 22.5 t axle load by 2030
To be equipped with RIS
Interoperability and Use of Tolling systems /Intelligent Traffic
Systems (ITS)
Core freight line speed 100 km/h by 2030
Reduced administrative
barriers and innovative vessels
Core freight lines to allow for 740 m long
trains by 2030
Availability of alternative clean
fuels in inland ports
Availability of alternative clean
fuels by 2030
Availability of alternative clean
fuels by 2030
Availability ofalternative clean
fuels by 2030
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
WHERE?… is the Rhine-Danube Corridor and where do we stand now?
Infrastructure and Status quo
10
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube – Alignment incl. nodes
11
Strasbourg
Mannheim/Ludwigsh.
Frankfurt/M.
Nürnberg
Stuttgart
München Wien
Bratislava
Budapest
Timişoara
Bucuresti
Constanta
Karls-ruhe
Enns
Dobreta-TurnuSeverin
Komarno
Calafat
Cernavoda
Galati
GiurgiuRuse
Vidin
Wels
Zilina
Craiova
Railways
Roads
Inland waterways
Urban nodes
AirportsMaritime ports
Inland ports
Rail-road terminals
belonging to Core Network
Additional
inland ports
Praha
Ostrava
Regensburg
Komarom
Vukovar
Pardubice
Plzen
Prerov
SlavonskiBrod
Novi Sad
Beograd
Giurgiulesti
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube - Critical issues rail – Summary (1)
12
Strasbourg
Mannheim
Frankfurt/M.
Nürnberg
Stuttgart
MünchenWien
Bratislava
Budapest
Timişoara
Bucuresti
Praha
Ostrava
Railway lines Low speed (< 100 km/h) Low axle load Strong incline
Urban nodes Low train length Missing electrification Single track section
All Romanian corridor network: 20-22 t
All Czech corridor network: < 740 m
All Slovakian corridor network: < 740 m
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube - Critical issues per line section rail
(2)
13
Strasbourg
Mannheim
Frankfurt/M.
Nürnberg
Stuttgart
MünchenWien
Bratislava
Budapest
Timişoara
Bucuresti
Praha
Ostrava
Railway lines without critical sections 1 critical issue 3 critical issues
Urban nodes 2 critical issues 4-5 critical issues
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube-bottlenecks/incompliances
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
15
StrasbourgCT NordCT Sud
Mannheim/LudwigshafenMannheim HandelshafenMannheim MCTMannheim MühlauhafenLudwigshafen KTL
Ludwigshafen Kaiserwörthhafen
Frankfurt/M.Frankfurt F.I.TFrankfurt OstFrankfurt Osthafen
NürnbergNürnberg Hafen
StuttgartKornwestheimStuttgart SCTStuttgart Hafen
MünchenMünchen Riem Wien
Wien InzersdorfWien Freudenau Hafen
BratislavaBratislava UNSBratislava Palenisko
BudapestBudapest Soroksár (BILK)Budapest MCC
TimişoaraTimişoara Semenic
BucurestiBucuresti Intermodal TerminalBucuresti NoiBucuresti Sud
KarlsruheKarlsruhe RbfKarlsruhe Hafen
Linz-WelsWels VbfWels RoLaLinz Stadthafen
ZilinaZilina
CraiovaCraiova
Railways
Roads
Inland waterways
Rail-road terminal core
network nodesNode
Rail-Road terminal
Trimodal terminal
PrahaPraha UhrinevesPraha Zizkov
OstravaOstrava PaskovOstrava Senov
PardubicePardubice
PlzenPlzen KoterovPlzen Nyrany
PrerovPrerov
KarlsruheKarlsruhe RbfKarlsruhe Hafen
FR DE AT CZ SK HU RO BG TOTAL
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
modal
Road-
Rail
Tri-
mod.
- 2 7 8 3 2 8 - 2 1 1 1 5 - 1 - 27 14
2 15 5 8 3 2 5 1 41
RuseRuse
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube – Rail/Road terminals
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Situation of the corridor at a glance (Rail)
16
� General corridor characteristics:
Black Sea branch: 2,300 km, 6 countries, 3 power systems, 7 signalling systems
CS branch: 1,150 km, 3 countries, 3 power systems, 3 signalling systemsAll corridor lines allow for passenger & freight traffic
� Achievement level of required TEN-T standards (= corridor objectives)
Electrification: > 90% Axle load >=22.5 tonnes: ~70%
Line speed >= 100 km/h: > 90%Train length >= 740m: ~50%
ERTMS: < 10%
� Achievement level of other relevant parameters
Loading gauge GC: ~60%
Double track: ~80%Max inclination <= 12.5 %: ~70%
� Hot spots
Areas with high capacity utilisation (consider different determination methods)Areas with low technical standards (esp. no electrification, single track)
Areas with missing ERTMS implementationMissing links (esp. related to high speed lines with finalisation date >2020/open)
� Approved project lists coordinated with member states
� most of the identified problems are tackled by dedicated projects
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
High capacity
utilisation
Low technical
standards
Missing link
Frankfurt – Mannheim – Karlsruhe X
Frankfurt – Mannheim Highspeed line
Frankfurt – Nürnberg X
Nürnberg – Cheb – Plzen X
Regensburg node X
Regensburg – Furth i.W. - Plzen X
Praha - Ostrava X
Appenweier - Karlsruhe Highspeed line
Stuttgart – Ulm Highspeed line
München node X
Mühldorf – Freilassing X
Linz – Wien (Sections) X Highspeed line
Bratislava node X X
Budapest node X Southern rail bypass
Gyoma – Lököshaza - Curtici X
Arad – Timisoara - Craiova X
Current hot spots (Rail)
Status: 11/2014
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
HOW?… could the objectives be reached?
Assessment of projects to solve the critical issues and need for action to close all the gaps on cross border issues and bottlenecks
18
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube - Number of all projects
19
17
25
11
46
10
5
4
6
0
21
5
4
8
2
6 6
8
8
6
10
32
6
4 3
2
13
7
9
15
7
16
5
3
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
FR DE AT HU RO CZ SK BG HR EU RS UA
Number of all projects - rail, RRT, IWW, ports, road
(Member States and 3rd countries)
airport
road
ports
IWW
RRT
rail
Member StatesMember StatesMember StatesMember States
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube-CEF pre-identified sections
including projects
20
116
5031
10
216
32 62
122
134
5163
14
72
4
338
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Rail IWW Ports Rail-/roadterminals
Road Airports
No CEF project
CEF pre-identified project
Total
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Rhine – Danube CEF funding per mode
€1,989.1M(7)
€151.2M(12)
€8.1M(1)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
RAIL IWW RIS
( ) = Number of projects
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine-Danube – Planned projects Rail:
Status Rail after project completion* (N° of critical issues)
22
Strasbourg
Mannheim
Frankfurt/M.
Nürnberg
Stuttgart
MünchenWien
Bratislava
Budapest
Timişoara
Bucuresti
Praha
Ostrava
Railway lines without critical sections 1 critical issue remaining 3 critical issues remaining
Urban nodes 2 critical issues remaining 4 critical issues remaining
* Only confirmed projects
Hungary: Preliminary project list
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Corridor work plan: agreed priorities
based on TEN-T Regulation
2nd Phase of the study 9/2015-12/2017; resulting in the
updating of the Work Plan of the Coordinator
1. Investing in cross-border links for rail, inland waterways and road with highest European added-value
2. Eliminating the bottlenecks
3. Fostering the restoration of good navigability
conditions on the Danube
4. Ensuring multimodal approach
5. Supporting the realization of modern and efficient logistics nodes for a real intermodal network
6. Striving for a very high level of standards.
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
HOW?
… could the objectives be reached?
Experiences in planning activities in SEE
24
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Coordination of railway designs in the Bulgaria TEN-T
Network
Consultant:
Joint Venture of Rubicon (BG), iC consulenten (AT)
and Ypsilon (BG)
25
Scope of Work:
� Review of Preliminary Design
� Tender Strategy and Preparation of Tender
Documents for Designers
� Data collection (Interfaces with utility providers,
spatial planning issues etc.)
� Coordination of 6 Railway Designers, 2 Station
Designers, Notified Body (Interoperability),
Archeological Consultant
� Checking of all design
� Coordination of Stakeholders, Authorities and other
Third Parties
� Updating of CBAs and preparation of Application
Forms for CEF funding
Role of the Consultant:
� Coordinator of tendering and
design activities on behalf of the
Project Implementation Unit (NRIC)
� Technical Assistance to the
Employer
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Design Contracts(Modernisation and Rehabilitation of railway lines, station buildings and structures)
26
Comprises Railway Sections:
� Sofia – Dragoman,
� Sofia – Pernik – Radomir,
� Railway junction Sofia and
� Railway junction Burgas
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
Challenges on the Project
� Project is part of the core network (OEMC)
� Requirements of the regulation 1530/2013 to be observed
� Large number of unresolved questions when starting the project
� Technical limitations due to topography and high building density in Sofia area
� Solving the question how to reach the infrastructure requirements for core network of the TEN-T Regulation (Art.39)
� Building capacity to local planners and coordination with international consultants
� Limited capacity of the beneficiary/PIU in project management
� Current low traffic figures hardly provide reasonable financial figures
27
iC consulenten / HaCon / Panteia / University Politehnica of Bucharest / Via donau
TEN-T CNC Rhine – Danube
Corridor study
Thank you for your attention
Karl Matousek
iC consulenten
Phone: +43 1 521 69 276
ÖVG, 5th Nov. 2015