29
Smoothing Variable- Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No.2, April 1999

Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

  • View
    221

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork

Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No.2, April 1999

Page 2: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Introduction To reduce the end-to-end resource

requirements, a stored-video server can smooth the outgoing stream through work-ahead transmission into the client playback buffer.

An efficient algorithm is presented for minimizing both the playback delay and the buffer allocation.

Page 3: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

The Sample Transmission Plan

Page 4: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Smoothing Constraints x: bytes of the playback buffer Lk: the amount of data consumed at the

client by time k Uk = Lk+x L = (L0,…,LN) U = (U0,…,UN) S = (S0,…,SN) R(S) = (S1-S0,…,SN-SN-1)

Page 5: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Change Point Change point:

If Rk+1≠Rk, then k is said to be a change point in the vector S.

Convex change point:If Rk+1>Rk

Concave change point:If Rk+1<Rk

Page 6: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Majorization Schedule Vector Y majorizes X

;intuitively, the elements of vector X are more “evenly distributed” than the elements of Y

K

i

K

i

k

iii

k

i

YiXiandKkfor

YXifYX

11

1][][

1

1,...,1

, ),(

Page 7: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Example: Jurassic Park

Page 8: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

The peak-rate curve p(x)

Page 9: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Single-Link Model Arrival vector A=(A0,…,AN)

Ak: The amount of data which has arrived at the ingress node by time k=0,1,…,N.

Ak ≧ Ak-1, k=1,…,N. Playout vector D=(D0,…,DN)

Dk: The amount of data that must be removed from the x-bit egress buffer by time k=0,1,…,N.

Dk ≧ Dk-1, k=1,…,N.

Page 10: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Single-Link Model D ≦ S ≦ D+vec(x) A-vec(M-x) ≦ S ≦ A S*(A, D, (M-x, x)) denote the

majorization schedule.

Page 11: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Buffer Allocation The smoothing constraints :

L1(x) = A + vec(x-M) U1(x)= D + vec(x) L2(x) = D U2(x)= A

S*(x) is the majorization schedule associated with S(max{L1(x), L2(x)}, min{U1(x), U2(x)}, (M-x,x)).

Page 12: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Buffer Allocation Lemma 3.1: The peak rate p(x, M) of the

single-link system is a piecewise-linear, convex function.

The main consequence of the lemma is that the peak-rate curve has one of the shapes shown in Fig. 4.

A binary search is sufficient to determine a value of x that minimizes p(x, M) for a given value of M.

Page 13: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Simpler case Now consider the simpler case of stored

video, where Ai=AN for k=0,1,…,N and the ingress buffer is large enough to store the entire video(I.e, AN bits).

The peak bandwidth decreases as the egress buffer size x increase.

U rises as x increases, causing a gradual decrease in the slope of the peak rate run.

Page 14: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Example

A

Page 15: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Start Up Delay A video service can minimize the

bandwidth requirements by introducing a start up latency of w at the egress node.

Dk(w) = 0, k=0,…,w-1

Dk-w, k=w,…,N+w Ak(w) = Ak, k=0,…,N

AN, k=N+1,…,N+w wmax ≡ min{w|max{Ak(w)-Dk(w)}≧M}

0≦k≦N+w

Page 16: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Start Up Delay The smoothing constraints:

L1(w)= D(w) U1(w) = D(w) + vec(x) L2(w)= A + vec(x - M) U2(w) = A (should exchange??)

Lemma 3.2: The peak rate, p(w), of the single link system is a piecewise-linear convex function of w.

Page 17: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Practical Constraints To account for a constant propagation

delay of d time units, the playout curve D should be shifted to the left by d units, to ensure that each frame arrives at the egress node by its deadline.

Delay jitter can be handled by making the smoothing constraints more conservative, based on the minimum and maximum number of bits that may arrive at any time.

Page 18: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Joint Minimization of Start Up Delay and Egress/Ingress Buffer Size

For stored video with an ingress buffer of size y≧DN, the smoothing constraints simplify to L(x,w)=D(w) and U(x,w) = D(w)+vec(x)

As late as possible: S = DN, k=N

max{S - r, Dk} k<N x* = max{S - Dk} w* = min{w|Ak – S ≧0}

Late

k

Late

K+1

Late

k

Late

kk

Page 19: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

As Late As Possible

Page 20: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Joint Minimization of Start Up Delay and Egress/Ingress Buffer Size Because x and w are independent, this

process jointly minimizes both x and w. As early as possible:

S = 0, k=0min{S +r, Ak}, k>0

y* = max{Ak-S } w* = min{w|S -Dk-w≧0}

After determining the values for x, y, and w, the majorization algorithm can compute the optimally smooth transmission schedule.

Early

k

Early

K-1Early

kkEarly

k

Page 21: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Joint Minimization of Start Up Delay and Total Buffer Allocation While x* was determined from Slate

subject to L(x,w) = D(x), the ingress buffer size y’ can be found by generating Searly’ subject to U = min{D(w) + vec(x*),A}. Consequently,y’(w) = max{Ak-S }, w≧w*

Similarly, x’ can be determined from Slate’ subject to L = max{D(w), A - vec(y*)}, resulting inx’(w) = max{S -Dk}, w≧w*

early’

k

late’

k

k

k

Page 22: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Theorem 4.1 Given a rate constraint r, an arrival

vector A, a playout vector D, and a startup latency w≧w*, the total buffer size size M(w) is minimized by allocating an egress buffer of size x* and an ingress buffer of size y’(w). Similarly, M(w) is minimized by allocating an egress buffer of size x’(w) and an ingress buffer of size y*. Selecting w=w* results in the minimum total buffer M*(w*)=x*+y’(w*)=x’(w*)+y*.

Page 23: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Theorem 4.2 Given a rate constraint r and A≡D, x* =

y* = x’(w*) = y’(w*) and M*(w*) = 2x* = 2y*.

The theorem shows that when the ingress node receives an unsmoothed version of the video stream, the optimal buffer allocation divides the resources evenly between the ingress and egress nodes.

Page 24: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Tandem Model

It is possible to compute an optimal tandem schedule by applying the majorization algorithm on a collection of independent single-link problems.

Page 25: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Optimization The optimal single-link solutions

{S*}i=1 are also the optimal link transmission schedules for the tandem system.

The optimal buffer allocation problem can be reduced to a single-link system with buffers at the ingress and egress nodes, such as b’ = (M-x,0,…,0,x).

in

Page 26: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Buffer Allocation

From upper left to lower right, the curves correspond to M = W, 1.25W, 1.5W, 2W, 3W.

Page 27: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Start Up Latency

Each peak-rate curve corresponds to a different value of M with an optimal buffer distribution of x = y = M/2.

Page 28: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Optimal Start Up Delay

The solid line corresponds to M = 2W

Page 29: Smoothing Variable-Bit-Rate Video in an Internetwork Jennifer Rexford, Member, IEEE, and Don Towsley, Fellow, IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,

Conclusion A simple binary search can determine

the buffer allocation and start up latency that minimize the peak rate in the transmission schedule.

The smoothing model has been applied to the online smoothing problem, where the ingress node does not have a prior knowledge of frame sizes.