Oyster Bay-East Norwich Central School District

  • Upload
    thuy

  • View
    45

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Oyster Bay-East Norwich Central School District. A Beacon of Light In an Ocean of Educational Possibilities. Dr. Hughes, EDU 5650 St. John’s University-2010 Prepared by: Valerie Vacchio. Purpose of the Study. The purpose of this study was to rank 10 school districts using 4 indicators: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Oyster Bay-East Norwich Central School DistrictDr. Hughes, EDU 5650St. Johns University-2010Prepared by: Valerie VacchioA Beacon of Light In an Ocean of Educational Possibilities

  • Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study was to rank 10 school districts using 4 indicators: finance, instruction, achievement, and census.

    Using these data we will be able to assess where our target district stands amongst the comparison districts in their standardized test scores. Moreover, we can discover what factors contribute directly to their ranking.

  • Purpose of the Study

    In addition, we will be able to identify: Where are we as a district? How far must we still go?Are we better or worse than we think?What will it take for us to improve?

  • Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSDMission Statement:

    To maximize each students personal potential for tomorrows world in a cost effective manner

  • Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSDTarget District ProfileCommunity:Oyster Bay is located on the North Shore of Long Island approximately 35 miles east of New York City. The residents are committed to quality education as evidenced by the expenditures per child, which are among the highest in the New York Metropolitan area. The student-teacher ratio is one of the lowest in Long Island.

  • Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSDAccreditations

    Recognized School of Excellence by the U.S. Department of Education

    Oyster Bay is accredited by the State of New York and the Middle States Association

  • Analysis of Ten Long Island School Districts

    Our Vision/Our Future

  • Districts of ComparisonLocust ValleyCarle PlaceMalverneIsland TreesSeafordNorth ShorePlainedgeBethpageEast WillistonOyster Bay-East Norwich

  • Definition of Terms

    Indicators: The working definition of the term indicator would be that Indicators are statistics which reflect the features and performance of an institution measured or assessed. They provide answers to questions related to how well an education system is functioning within a broad standard or reference point. Indicators make a comparison over time, among jurisdiction, or against some predetermined standard or set of criteria. They provide a snapshot of current conditions by reflecting the characteristics jurisdiction relative to vision and mission and the attainment keeping in view the criteria of quality education. (Education and Development, G. Pankajam, 2005)

  • Definition of TermsAspiration District: a similar district that appears to be outperforming the target district

    Target District: a district that does not appear to be the best in all categories

  • Definition of TermsIntersection: the process of combined multiple data points to gain greater insight into a particular problem (Bernhardt, 2003)

    School District Almanac: a publication containing statistical, tabular, and general informationoften including miscellary information (www.almanac.cc)

  • What does the data tell us?

    What do they not tell us?

    What else do we need to know?

    What good news is there to celebrate?

    What needs for school improvement might arise from the data? Research Questions:

  • Literature Review

    Using Data To Frame the ProblemThe 5 Cs: Dr. Jonathan Hughes

    Content-What do we have?Compare-Who are we?Contrast- Where do we stand?Context-Why are we here?Construct-How do we move?Where are we going?

  • Literature ReviewConceptual Framework: Examining the Data(Based on the framework by Edgar Schein)

    Look for THEMES:Major trends or ideas similar across districts in ALL tables

    Look for PATTERNS:Defining trends in that they are specific to one or more tables, but not necessarily across all tables

    Look for DISCREPANCIES:Differences or aberrations that seemingly counter the themes and patterns

  • Methodology

    Step 1: Choose the target district.

    Step 2: Choose indicators.What makes a good indicator? Would these indicators form a good report card for the district?

    Step 3: Find comparable districts using Almanac Data 2010.

  • MethodologyStep 4: Target these specific districts and mine its data. Are there others you would have liked to add to the two indicators in each area?Are there redundancies among the areas?

    Step 5: An aspiration district was chosen which was similar to the target district, but appears to be outperforming the target district.

    Step 6: Using data from the findings and make recommendations to move the target district forward.

  • Findings

  • Indicators

    Instructional IndicatorsFinancial IndicatorsStudent Performance IndicatorsCensus Data

  • Instructional Indicators Total Enrollment vs. Number of Teachers

    Student/Teacher Ratio

    Curriculum Development Expenditures

  • Total Enrollment vs. Number of Teachers

  • Student/Teacher Ratio

  • Curriculum Development Expenditures

  • Financial Indicators

    School ExpendituresInstructional ExpendituresPer Pupil ExpendituresInstructional Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures

  • School Expenditures

  • Per Pupil Expenditures

  • Student Performance IndicatorsELA Grade 4 Math Grade 4 ELA Grade 8 Math Grade 8 Regents Diploma (2008)

  • Math 4 vs. Math 8

  • Regents Diploma 2008

  • Census DataMedian Home ValueCombined Wealth Ratio Total Population Total Enrollment District Enrollment as a % of Total Population

  • Median Home Value

  • Combined Wealth Ratio

  • Total Enrollment

  • Summative Matrix

    Student PerformanceInstruction IndicatorsFinancial Data Census Overall rankingsOyster Bay-East Norwich64454Locust Valley32721Carle Place521103Malverne97288Island Trees75688Seaford69568North Shore81914Plainedge49637Bethpage25844East Williston18262

  • FindingsGood is the enemy of great.~Jim Collins

  • The 5 Cs:

    Dr. Jonathan Hughes

    Content-What do we have?Compare-Who are we?Contrast- Where do we stand?Context-Why are we here?Construct-How do we move?Where are we going?

  • Content-What do we have?Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD is a financially stable district with controlled spending and efficiencies.

    Demographic data indicates that Oyster Bay has the highest median home value of all districts analyzed.

    The combined wealth ratio is extremely high which equates to the fact that the district receives very little state aid.

  • Compare-Who are we?Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD is a high-performing school district that is committed to excellence in education for ALL students.

    The professional staff are committed members of an accountable learning community focused on improving student achievement.

    The budget process is an annual challenge due to the fact that many students who live in the district attend private schools.

    We strive to maintain the integrity of our vision while simultaneously keeping tax implications in mind.

  • Compare-Who are we?The NYS assessment data indicates that Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD is comparable to similar districts, often times outperforming them.

    The high school graduation rate in 2010 was 98%.

    Approximately 92% of our students graduate with a NYS Regents diploma.

  • Contrast- Where do we stand?After analyzing the data, Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD was ranked 4 out of 10 overall.

    In the area of Instruction and Finance, Oyster Bay-East Norwich CSD is ranked 4th.

    Oyster Bay falls slightly below the aspiration district in regard to student performance, while outperforming several of the comparison districts.

    Student performance is the area where we need to focus our attention.

  • Context-Why are we here?Changes to the NYS ELA Assessments2009-2010Raised cut scores for Level 2 and Level 3 ProficiencyIncluded 25 to 30 percent more tested performance indicators on the Math assessmentsAdded audit items

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • Context-Why are we here?

  • ConstructHow do we move? Where are we going?As the Supervisor of English Language Arts, it is recommended that we analyze, monitor, and modify and the current K-12 English Language Arts Curriculum.

  • Conclusions/Next Steps . . . What are we going to do first?

    What will we do to help students meet the new proficiency standards set by NYS?

  • Recommendations:

    Provide Academic Intervention Services (AIS) for students at Level 2, with a school option to offer AIS to other students falling short of the new Proficiency threshold

    Review English Language Arts Curriculum (K-12) to ensure it is fully aligned with NYS Standards and performance indicators

  • Recommendations:Begin to align the current English Language Arts Curriculum (K-12) to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

    Implement Response to Intervention (RTI) to all students in grades K-3 with support from regional RTI specialists

  • Recommendations:

    Strengthen early childhood education by aligning the Pre-K curriculum to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

    Ongoing data analysis-All teachers in grades 3-8 who teach a class linked to a state exam will have an individual meeting with the Supervisor of ELA, Principal, and Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction to review data

  • RecommendationsImplement differentiated Instruction and Learning

    Share/pool special education resources & funding with general education

  • Thank you!

    What questions do you have?

    *******************************************************