Upload
dinhnhi
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
—— _&, ,.-
m3N CuPY:REIQ’BNm --—-.-~.y:.AR-WC@-woIIJ)
KmrIAmama 3.lKm NAc/4&
a ,
NATIONALADVISORYCOMMI’M’EE13’71a
c. I-—..
FORAERONAUTICS
TECHNICAL NOTE 3712
---- -.
BOUNDARY LAYER BEHIND SHOCK OR THIN EXPANSION
WAVE MOVING INTO STATIONARY FLUID
By HaroldMirels
Lem& FlightPropulsionLaboratoryCleveland,Ohio
Washington
my 1956
.
1---”...- . . . ,----- . ... . .. ..... . .... . .. .._—-.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930084483 2018-03-26T14:28:59+00:00Z
ItGH LIdRARY KAFB,NM
NACATN3712
,,
$
suMMARY. . . . .
JIW!RODUCTION. .
ANALYSIS. . . .
TABLEOFCOI&N17S0=
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .CoordinateSystems. . . .LsminarBoundaryLayer. .Integral.solution. . . .Jhterpolationformulas.W~ surfacetemperature
TurbulentBoundaryLqjer.Boundary-lqwrsolution.Wallsurfacetemperature
CORRECTION@’DAM.....
CONCLUDD!W3ImmIUw . . . . .
APPlmDlmSA-
B-
c-
D-
SYMBOLS. ...*...
WAVEJ3ELATIONS. . . .
.
.
.........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
●
✎
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
●
✎
.
.
.-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
●
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
InlllllllllllllllllllllllUllbb~3jl
.9. 0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
✎
LAMINAR-BomY-IAYERSOUJTIONImmENcm ToTmmmwmm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EVALUATIONOF ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ImFEREmEs.. o........ . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
.
●
.●
●
✎
✎
●
✎
✎
✎
●
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
●
✎
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
AMM3.?. . . .
.0.0
● ✎ ✎ ✎
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
.
.
.
.
.
.●
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
✎
Page
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1
22391215191924
26
29
30
33
36
38
40
..-.- .. . . . ..— ——- ——,
. NATIONALADVDORYCOMMITIZEF(R
TIZCllNICALNOl!lZ3712
,.
*
BOUNRARYLINERBEHINDSHOCKORTHINEXPANSION
WAVE
Theboundary~erintoa stationaryfluid
MOVINGINTOSTATIONARYFLUID
ByHaroldMirels
sUlmmY
behinda shockorthineq%nsionwaveadvancinghasbeendetermined.Lminarandturbulentbound-
aryl~erswere&nsidered.Thewdl surfacetemperaturebeldndthewavewasalsoinvestigated.Theassumptionofa thinqymsionwaveisvalidforweakexpansionsbutbecomesprogressivelylessaccurateforstrong~ion waves. .
Thelam3nar-boundary-lsyerproblemwassolvedbynumericalintegra-tionexcet fortheweakwavecase,whichcanbesolvedanalytically.
7ExtegralK&rm&n—Pohlhausentype)solutionswerealsoobtainedtoprovidea guidefordetemdningeqmessionswhichaccuratelyrepresentthenumer-icaldata.Analyticaleqressionsforvariousboundary-layerparametersarepresentedwhichWee withthenumericalintegrationswithti1 percent.
Theturbulent-boundary-~erproblemwassolvedusinginte~almeth-odssimilartothoseemployedforthesolutionofturbulentcompressibleflowuvera semi-~initeflatplate.Thefluidvelocity,relativetothewall,wasassumedtohavea seventh-powerprofile.TheBlasiusegya-tion,relat~ turbulentskinfrictionandboundary-werthiclmess$wasutilizedina formwhichaccountedforcompressibility.
ConsiderationoftheheattransfertothewallpermittedthewaJJsurfacetemperature,belxlndthewave,tobedetermined.Thewallthick-nesswasassumedtobegreaterthanthewalltkrmal-boundary-lsyerthiclmess.Itwasfoundthatthewalltemperaturewasuniform(asafunctionofdistancebehindthewave)forthelaminar-boundary-~rcasebutvariedwithdistancefortheturbulent-boundary-layercase.
INTROZ?JCTION
Ifa shockoreqansionwaveadvancesintoa stationaryfluidboundedbya wall,aboundary-layerflowisestablishedalongthewallbeklndthewave.Thisboundary-layerflOWtioftm ~ort~t ~ s-es ofPh~~
\
.-—. —.—- .. ——. —
2 NACATN3712
involvingnonstationarywaves{e.g.,shocktribestudies,initiatimofdetonationstudies,etc.).
M references1 to3,thelaminarboundarylayerbehinda shockwaveisstudied.!Chepurposeofthispaperistocuclxmdreference1 toincludethecaseoftlxinexpansionwaves{i.e.,eqymsionwavesofzerothickness)andthecaseofturbulentboundarylayers.Thisextensionwasmotivatedprimarilybya desiretoprovideboundary-layerinform-ationforstudiesofshockattenuationina shocktube(e.g.,ref.4). CNCDulco
Theassumptionofa zero-thicknessexpansionwave{referredtoaaa “negativeshock”inref.4)becomesprogressivelylessaccurateasthestrength[pressureratio)oftheeqansionwaveincreases.Thus,theapplicabilityoftheboundary-layerresultsinshockttieswhereinstrong~im OCCI-Umaybe questioned.Nevertheless,theassumptionofazero-thicknessexpansionwavewillberetainedforrangesoftheparsm-eter~ue {symbolsdefinedinappendixA) correspmdingtostrongex-pansionwaves.Thereasonforre-~ theassumptionistmfold.Ftist2a qualitativeestimateoftheboundary@er intheconstsnt-pressureregionbehindstrongexpansionwavesisobtained.IXmaybe %possibletomoMfytheseresultstogivebetteragreementwithmoreac-curateesthetesoftheboundaryleyer behinda strongexpansionwave. .Second,theresultsaredirectlyapplicabletootherphysicalproblems
.
suchas{1)theboundarylayerona semi-inftiiteflatplatewithtan-gentialblowingand(2)theboundary-r behinda planarflamefrontpropagatmina stationarycmimstiblemixture.
An independentinvestigationoftheboundarylayerbehindanex-pansionwave,tsk3ngintoaccounttheftiitethicknessofthee.qmnsion
urrentl.yinprogressattheNACALangleylaboratory.wave,isc
A shockorqansionwaveisconsideredtomovewithconstautveloc-ity}paralleltoa wall.,titoa stationaryfluid{fig.1). TheboundarylsyeralongtheWSJ3.behindthewaveistobedetermined.Jnthecaseofaneqansionwave,finitethiclmessofthewavew3JJ-be ignored.BothLm5narandturbulentboundarylqpxswill.beconsidered.
CoordinateSystems
IA %,7 be a comdjnatesystemfixedwithrespecttothewallandlet ii,~bevelocitiesparallel.to =,$ asindicatedinfigurel(a).Theflowisunsteadyinthe =j~-coordinatesystem.Let x,y representa coordinatesystemmoi3ngwiththewave(fig.l(b)).Thevelocitiesparalleltothex-andy-coordinatesqredenotedby u and v,respec- titively. b thiscoord=tesyst=,theflowW ste*O
.-. . -—
NACATN3712.
3.
,.
.
_-Assumethat attimet = O thetwocoorMnateIf UA isthevelocityofthewaverelativetothe
ux arerel.atedbyx == -fidt.!J!hesxial.u=;+ Notethatthewallmoveswithx)y-coordimtesystm. Thetransformatimslsobeqyressedas
1
~=x-’%ty.y
systemscoin~ide.wall,thenx and
velocitiesarerelatedbyvelocity~ = -;d illtherelat~ thetwosystemC=
(1)
EquationsdeftiingconditionsacrosstheshockandeqansionwavesaresummarizedinappendixB.
LaminarBoundaryLsyer
ThePrsndtlboundary-layerequationsapplyfortheflowb thevi-cinityofthewall,exceptatthebaseofthewavewherethebuundary-layerassumptionsbreakdown.Byassuminglaminarflowand d@x = 0,theboundary--regpationsfor x >0 are
(2a)
(i?b)
P=@ @d}
Theboundaryconditionsfor x >0 are
U(x,o)= ~ u(x,=)= ue
V(x,o)= o 1T(x,+ = Te
J
[3)
. . ........_—.—. — .— — ——-—. .
4 . NACATN3712*
Theseeqpationscanbetransformedtoa formsuitablefornumericalin-tegration.Tmaccordancewithreference5,itwillbeassumedthatpsnd k areproportionalto T andthat ~ aud a we tidependentof T. Thesestatepropertiesw5Jlbedefinedtohavethecorrectnumer-icalvaluesatthewall.Theuseofa mesnreferenceteqerature,ratherthana wsJJreferencetemperature,isdiscussedinappendixC.
Frcmequation(2a],a streamfunction~ existssothat
p=Pw $
~=-f 1
CAcoUICD
(4). .Pw-
Deftiea s~ity parameter
andassumethat~ canbeexpressedintheform
* = -W f(q)
Thevelocitiesarethen
Assumethat~ snd k areproportionaltoofpropotiionalitysothat p and k have
Tthe
??)}
(5)
(6)
(7)
andchoosetheconstmtscorrectnumericalvalues
w
.
Q
.- . .. - .- —- —.
NACATN3712 5
atthewall;sidlarly,assumethat cP and a areconstantattheir
wallvalues. Thus,
k=
CP=
Una w JThemomentumequationcannowbewritten
1ft?f+ ff”= ()
f(o)= o
JJ
f’(o)= u Ue
f’(=)=1
andtheenergyequationbeccmes
T(x,O)-‘%T= T=
JSinceequations(10)areltiear,T canbeexpressedasthelinearsuper-positionofthesolutionforzeroheattransferplustheeffect”ofheattransfer.Thatis,
(U)
.— — —... —.- —. —..
s
6
where
-2awP’=%r“+ a z(f“)2
‘()}—- 1ue
J!IAC.ATN3712 .,
>
and
Equations(13)and(14)
r(ao)= rt(o) x c)J.
}
‘“+‘W@’=0“[o] = 1
s(a)= o
can also beexpressedtnquadraturefore:
{13)
.
(14)
Wkrest IIW nowbeexpressedaaBoundary-layerparametersof
.W= (Il$)w.uefmq’ (Ma)
%’ ()‘k% r= -S1(O}{TW-Tr) =* ~ (Mb)
w w
.
#,
—. . .-. .—_ -—. . -_—— . . —. .. .-. .______
NACATN3712
(H’)f”sdilo
6*=r‘e ‘e—dxuzp‘e
oe
{16d)
whereq equalstheheattransfe.inthe+y-direction.Equation[16.)resultsfromtheexpressionv&e = db*/dx,whichcm bededucedf.OIUthecentinuityequationsndthedefini.timof 5*.
Equations{9)to{15)canbe titegratedsnalyticaldyfor
l’+.$”e-11<<1 (i.e.,weakwaves).Theintegrationswereconductedinreference1 andtheresultsaresumma.tiedasfol.lows:
. . ... ..— ..-. — .—
“
[“sd,=~+o(+)
NMIATN3712
(17f)
Equations{15)aretitegniblefOr Cw = 1. - 3X3Sd.tSShOW
2
()
%—-f’r = 1- %
%1—-‘.
m
J[()25!-1 (f-q]-1-f“(o)‘erdq=ldm
7-
()
2%1—-‘.
0
..=%1—-‘.
J*sdq’’E(t
{17i)
(Ma)
(18(I)
Equations(9)havebeenintegrat~nmeric~ (~tiganIBMcard-progrsmnedelectroniccalculator)for 1+#~ = 1.5,.2, 3,4,5,and6,andtheresultssrepresentedinreference1. Therange16 u&e&6
.
wco(nco
-. ..—. . ..—- --—— —-- --——-
NACJlTN3712
coverstheentirerangefromveryweaktoverystrongshockwaves.Equations(15)arealsoevaluatedinreference1 for Uw= 0.72 and%/% = 2,4,and6. Jhordertoextendthenumericalcalculatimstothecaseofa thin~ansionwave,equations-(9)have‘beenintegratedfor~/ue=S0,0.25,0.50, and0.75[table1). ThecaseU#Ie = O isthewell-knownBlaaiwproblemforflowpasta semi-infiniteflatplateaudisincludedhereinforthesakeofcompleteness.Equations{15]wereintegratedfor ~~ = O,0.25,0.50,0.75and Uw= 0.72(tableI).135xxuappentiB,thelimitingvalueof u#e forstrongeqymsionwavesis fi=y-l Thesecalculationsweremadeustigtheintegrationtech-
‘e y+l”nigyedescribediuappendtiB ofreference6. Theresultsofreference1for ~~~ = 2,4,and6 arealsoincludedintale I.
titegralsolution.-Thenumericalintegrationsofequations(9)and{15)havetheUnitatimthatonlyspecificvaluesof u#~ and
‘W csnbetreated.Theanalyticdependenceoftheboundary-l~erpa-rmeterson uJ~ and IJwarenut-licitlydefinedbythesespecificSolutions.tiordertoobtainapproxhnateanalyticsolutions,aninte-gral{K&& -PohlhaMen)meth~ofapproachwillnowbeused.There-sultswillbeusedlaterinthissectiontoobtatianalyticexpressionswhichaccuratelythisreport.
titegrating
Let y=~view.The~= q/l&nomialill
gives
representthenumericaldatapresentedintableI of
eqy.ations(9)withrespectto q,intherangetheWegralformofthemomentumequation
J’mf“(o)= f’(1-f’}d~o
betheedgeoftheboundarylayerfromacorrespondingvalueof q isdesignatedThevelocityf~ isnowrepresentedbya~ intherange06 ~< l.l Usingthetwo
{19)
Pohlhausenpointofng” Definefourth-degreepoly-
tiom on f‘ notedineqpatjions(9)plusthebounm
‘f‘“)&O = O,inordertosatisfyequations(9),and
%eferences3 and7 alsousedintegralapproaches
boundaryCOJdi-conditions
f51@o@l$fourth-degreepolynomialsinstudiesofthelsminarboundarylayerbehindmovingshocks. Inreference8,a normalizederrorfunctionwasusediusteadofthefourth-degreepolynomial.Thisresultedinverygoodagreementwiththeexactnumericalintegrationofthecorrespondingboundary-xewtions.
,
. -- .-— —— —.. . -.———--
.
10 NACATN3712 .
(f’’)g=l= (f‘“)g~ = O,inordertogeta smoothjoin= withtheex-=ternalflow,gives
for 0< ~<1,
( )(%%T12Cf’.—-)
- 2C3+ C4‘e ‘e
for 1< ~,
f’=1}
Equation(19)canbewrittenaa
J’1f“(o)= llg f’[1-f’]d~ .0
Stistitutingequations(20)intoequation(21),noting
u-
11315ng=z74+1155
‘e
(20) 04ECD
@l)
(22)
which,
titiestogetherwithequations(20),deftiesf‘. Thefollowingquan-areofinterest:.
(23a)
.
Equations[23)arec7
ared,intableII,withtheexactintegrationofequations(9)for % = (),1,and6. Itisseenthateqpation(23a) .
-..
—. . —.. . . — -.. -—— .— -..
NACATN3712r u
agreeswithin4 percentwiththeexactintegration.Equation[23b)agreeswithin2percentat ~ue = O andwithin10percentat1+.$s= 6. TableIIservestoindicatetheaccuracyoftheintegralmethodofSoluticmofthemomentumequation.
Stistitutionofequations(20)and(22)fitoequaticms(15)gives
.
where
.
@4a)
(24b)
(24C)
@d)
(24e)
(25a)
(25b)
(25c)
(25d)
(25e)
[25f}
.— .—— - ——
12 NACATN3712
Equations(24)definethefunctionaldependence,on Ow)~ ‘d %/”e~ofthev=iousquantitiesnotedtowithintheaccuracyofthetitegralmethod. Equations(25)canbe integratedanalyticallyfor Uw= 1. ForotherPrandtlnumbers,numeric~titegratim~ oramro~te aic~integrationswouldberequired.
Equations[24c)to (Me)indicatethatthefunctionaldependenceof
J“rd’J J“s “) ad “(0’m “w m ‘i&pm*nt ‘f ‘iUeocJ
arimnofequation(24d)withtheexactsolutionfor s‘(0)at‘e= 1 (i.e.,eq.(17h))indicatesthatK(aw)shouldbeproportional.
1’2 Howevercomparisonofequation(24d)withtheexactsolutimto Uw .tionfor u#ue= O‘(ref.5)indicatesthatK(@ shouldbeproportional
●
wcoVlCD
113for Uwto aw intherange0.6< aw<1. ThediscrepancyisduetotoImitationsoftheintegralmethd. Henceeqmtions(24)sad(25)wouldhavetobemodified3fgreateraccuracyisdesired.Possiblemod- .ificationsareindicatedinthenextsection.Comparisonofeqpa%ions(24c)end(24d)withequations(17f)and(17i)indicatesthat,for ~/ue .near1,1(@ isa constattifleJ(cW)variesd~ctlY ~ l/@w.
hterpolationfommilas.-Equations(23)ad (24)canbeusedasaguidetoobtainam.1.yticexpressionswhichaccuratelyrepresentthedataobtainedfromtheexactnumericalintegratimsofequations(9)and[15).Thevariousboundary-layerpammetersareassumedtod~nd on u#eand Uw asfOllows:
(26a)
(26c)
*
.
_. —-. ..—— .- ——————.———-- -. --— .—-. —-———-——
13
J00
s d?
o
s’(o) = C9
C7
r{O)=
Thecaseofanexpansionwave
(26e)
(26f)
anda shckwavearedistinguishedby0< ~j~~ 1 ‘d
3writ separateformulasfortheranges1< Ue< 6. Theresultsare,
(27a)
1.217
%1.326—%
[
w
‘d’=11%’”W:”2[
m
sdq=
Jo
.
1o217
m{””’-0”36”n)
(27c)
(27d)
- ---- —... — .—
%1+ l.665—‘e
=-F=J0““’=F=’”W:”MI0“Sd’=i-(ow
NACATN3712 ,:
.
S1{o)= -0.489
F=’”w:”4m”022(tiue’0.39-0.023(u#e]
do) = bw)
(27a’)
{“b‘)
(27c‘)
.
(“d’) r.
[27e’)
{“f‘)
Equations(27]wereobtainedbym&cMng equations26) attheendpointsoftheintervalsO < (U#Ue)<1 and [1~ ~~~) < 6,withtheexactintegrationsofecyzations{9)and(15)(table1). Equations
[127 agreewithtableI towithin1 percent.Theaccuracyofe ations
r)27 canbeestimatedfromtableIII,whichcomparesequations27withtableI fortheintermediatepointsu#e = 0.25,0.50,0.75,2,and4.
Eqyations[27]me basedm numericalsolutionscorrespondingtoaws 1 ad aws ..72.Theyshouldgivereasomibleesttitesforothervaluesof Uw ofthisorder(i.e.,0.6< crw<1). An exacta~rtisalofequations(27)for Uw other.than1 and0.72requiresfurtherfives-tigationoftheexactintegrationsofequations(9]and(15).Suchautivestigationisconsideredbeyondthescopeofthisreport.
P.
—. -. —. .— .—— .-. .— —
I
.
.
NACATN 3712 15
Wallsurfacetemperatie.-Untilnowithasbeenassumedthatthewallsurfacet~eratureisconstsmtbehindtheshockor~im wave.Thiscanbeshowntobetruefora l.smhaxboundarylayer.Themagni-tudeofthewalltemperaturewillnowbedetermined,assumingthatthewallthicknessisfgeaterthenthewallthermalbouddarylayer.2
Inthesteadyx,y-coordinatesystem,thewallhasa uniformveloc-ity ~. However,thereisa themalboundary@yer inthewallwhichiss~ tothatintheadjacentfluid{fig.2]. Assumethatbeforetheappearanceofthewave,[email protected]~eratureTb.
Whena -tity isdiscontinuousacrossy = 0$thesmscri~s wand O- willbeusedtoindicatequantitiesevaluatedat y = @ endy a 0-, respectively.Neglectthevariationofstateproperties(suchas k,p,etc.) intheWSJJ.ad mite the~fusivitYofthe~ a
()k
so-=x “ Byusingboundary-werassumptions,theenergyequation\ ~/ ()-
forthewallbecomes
a= ao- ii%.X ~$ (28a)
for x >0,
Equation(28a)canbeobtainedfromequation(2c)byassmd.n$thewalltobe equivalenttoa fluidwith p = v = O. Assume(tobeverfiiedlaterh thissection)thatTw isconstmt.Thesolutionofequations(28)iSthen
%he problemofthewallsurfacetemperatureassociatedwiththeladnarboundarylayerbeh~ amov~ shockWM SOIVe%fi@?efi~tW)h reference8. Thedevelopmenth reference8 issomewhatmorede-tailedthanthatgivenherein.Theresultsareessentiallyh agree-mentwiththisreport.
-.. —__ —.. _ _-
16
Theheattransferh the+y-directionat y = 0- is
%-“()‘k?$o-
Frm equation(Mb],theheattransferredintothefluidis
% = -s‘(0)(TW-Tr)~’(g)
NACATN 3712 ,,
.
Equations{30)and(31)~ beeqmted,yield3ng
~ -~ =A [(Tr/~)-1]Tb l+A
where- —-
~= -s’{0) %2 %-%——TL%#o-(–(v2-uYcw
Equatim {32a)issolvedfor’Tw byfunctionsof ~). ThechoiceTw=god firstapproximation.Notethat
iteration{since
(30)
(31)
(32a)
[32b)
A and Tr areiteration,isa
~ isa constant,whichiscon-
.
sistentwithand,therefore,substa.utiatestheoriginalassumptiontothis”effect.
TheratioTr/Tbcanbeexpressedasa flmcticaof ~/~ andr(0)byuseofequatim(12)andequatioxis(B3),(lM),(B7),and(B8)ofappendtiB. Theresultsare(assumingCp,e = Cp,w)
.
. . . ..-— .—. .— —..—. .——-
NACATN3712
for u@e >1,
Tr ()%—-1. ~-1Tb e
u)%to
for 4 Ue< 1,.
1.
Tr—-1.Tb
=
a
2
(>)[-1 y+l%
2uue y-l~-
17.
(338)
1=-3 (~ )-1 forr= 1.4;r(0)= 1
)2 ( )]%21 +~r(0) —-1 -
r %1 (33b)
\
Itshouldbenotedthatfor Tr/!%>1 theheattmmfer isfromthefluidtothewall,whereaafor T~~ < 1 theheattransferisfrmthewalltothefluid.Thus,fortheflowbehinda shockwave(eq.(338))theheattransferisalwaysfrm thefluidtothewall.However,fortheflowbelxlndanexpansionwawe(eq.(33b))theheattransferisfromthewaU tothefluidforrelativelyweakexpansionwavesandfromthefluidtothewallforstrong_sion waves.WhenT = 1.4 and r(0)= 1,thechangeinthedirectionofheattransferoccursat pe/~ = (2/3)7.Thischangeh heat-transferdirectionisa consequenceofthefactthatthestagnationtemperature(relativetothemill)behinda tti cqansion
&y-l
()waveislessthanZ& for p~~ > ~ andisgreaterthanTb
2r
()3- ~ r-lafor P~~C ~+1 Theboundary-layerrecoverytemperatureTr
. .. —--- ___ ——. .
18
egyalsthefree-stresmstaguatimtemperature(relativefor r(0)= 1 andissome-t lessthanthestationr(0)< 1. Ifthefinitethicknessofthewaveistaken
NA.CATM3712
tothewall)temperatureforintoaccount
f&-a verystrong~ansionwave,itis~ected thattheheattransferwillbefrm thewa2J.tothefluidfortheearlystagesofthe~amionandfromthefluidtothewallforthefinalstagesoftheexpansim.
Theorderofma~itudeof(~ -TJ/Tb will. nowbetiteminedo
Equations(17h),(27e),and(27e’) indicatev-r
‘e-s’(0)~ ~= 1“Therefore,A canbeapprciximatedas
EFkisk~~a istobe&intmm.yreference
rao- %‘w-c (34)
proportionalto T and ~ isconstant,thenthevalueofhdependentoftemperaturefora givengas.Assumethefluidandthewalltobecasttim {carbon,approx.4 percent)bothata temperatureTb= 530°R. Us@ thepropertyvaluesof9 evaluatedat530°R givesA ~ 0.0004.Stistitut~equa-
tions(33)intoequation(32a)yields,withA = 0.0004,r(0)= 1,andy = 1.4,
for u#e > 1,
~-Tb $()-1
%z().0004— 3 (35a)
TJfor u Uee 1,
ThewaXlwillremaintitlxlnO.1percentofitsoriginaltemperatureforshocksUp to K ~ 3 md forECU~ion waves.Thewallwillremainwithin1 percentofitsoriginalvalueforshocksw to B$~ 9 andwithin10p~ent ofitsoriginal.valuefor 1%~ 27. Similarresultswouldbeobtainedif&hergasesandwallmet& sreused.Theimpor-tantparameter1$.& issmallbecauseoftherelativelylowheatcon-ductivityofgasesccmparedwithmetals.Thefactthatthewallr~essentiallyatitsoriginaltemperature(exceptpossiblyforextremelystrongshockwaves) justifiesthedisregsrdofthevsriationofwallstatepropertieswithtemperaturesinequation(28a).
.
.
.
.
.
-. .—— — . ..— —.——... .— - .. . . .—— ____
NMA TN3712
Thethicknessofbefound.Definethe
19
thewadlthermal.boundaryQmr ~ canreadilyedgeofthethermalboundarylsYertocorrespond
Itisofinteresttoc~ 4 withthethermal-boq-xer thick-m nessh thefluid~. Forconvenience,considerthe-caseofweakwaves.U)Oam Equations(n) and(17$),togetherwiththepreviouslydefinedcriterion
fortheedgeofa thermalbouudarylayer,give
(37)
whichisoftheorderof1 forsaneatiandmetalwaJlconibinations.
Thesolutionforthewallsurfacetemperaturepresentedhereinisvalidprovidedthewadlthicknessis(atleast)greaterthan~.
TurbulentBoun&myLsyer
Previously,itwasassumedthatthebmmiarylayerbehindthewavema laminar.Nowtheturbulent-boundary-layercasew513.betreatedus3ngintegralmethods.@ solutionswill.beobtainedbyextendingempirical,semi-~fiiteflat-plate,boundary-m datatothecasewherethewa31ismoving.
Boundary-layersolution.-Theintegralformofthemomentumequa-tionis
de=—dx
whereu/ue representstheawerageboundsry-@yerthiCkIleSSby ~ =d
(39]
velocity.Asbefore,denotethedefinea similarityparameter
—.—— ____ .—
20
t+ = y~ii Itisnecesssrytoexpressu/~ asa fuuctionstudiesoftheturbulentboundarylayerona semi-ini?tiite
NACATN3712
of ~. kflatplate,
itiscustomarytoassumeu/ue= #7 for OS~<l. Theuseoftheseventh-powerlawsmearstoagreewithavailabledata,evenforhighMachnmiberflom$andtoresultinreasonablyaccuraterelationsforskinfriction(eg.,refs.10and11). Inordertoextendthisproffietothecaseofamovimwa12,itisassumedthatthefluidvelocitiesrelative tothemillh&e a
for O<~T~l>
~eventh-powerprofile.Thatis,
Itisslsonecess~toexpressT/Te(~P~P) ss a tictim d CT.TheformassumedhereinW
(40)
for O<!T<l)
whereTr
b=%-l
()Tr Tec= q-lq
(A%CD
(41)
Fora Prandtlnumberof1,thedependenceof T/Te on u/ue h eqyations
(41)isthesameasthatindicatedinequation{12).WhenthePrandtlnumberisnottoofarfrcm1,equations(41)shouldgiveatleastareasomibleest-te for T/Te.
.
.
—.. .—— .-——--— -. _..—
.
mInmto
.
.
NACA
ness
TN3712
BYusing equatimz[40]ad (Q.),anddisplacementthicknesscanbe
21
theboundary-@yermomentumthick-Qressedas
where16)%J and 18titegral
withN = 6,7,or8.appendixD. Itshould
(42b)
arefunctionsof b and c def~d bythe
1d’ zNdza (43)
o l+ bz-cz2
A methodforevehating~ isindicatedinbenotedthattheiutegrsls~ end(~ - In)
sretabulatedinreference U for the range -l<b~”lo ad - -o~b;~—<1. TheresultswerecomputedusingSimpson’srule.There-sultsofreference11canbeusedtotabulatevaluesof 18 land16.Thehrtegral16 isfoundfmm therelation16= ~ -b% + C18)whichfo~owsfromequation(43).m reciprocalsof 16)%, ~d 18,b~ed “onthedataofreference11,arepresentedh tableIV. Reciprocalssreusedto ermitMmearinterpolation.Whenb isnem -1 or
Tc/{b+ 1 isnear1,thelinearinterpolationbecomesinaccuratesnduseof
be
b
a~enti D isrecommended.
Stice8/~ isindependentofconstant),equation(39)canbe
x {assumingthewald.temperaturetowritten
(44)
ordertointegrateequation(44)Zitisnecessarytohavea relation..betweenTV and ~. Forinc~ressibleturbulentflowpasta semi-infinitefiatplate,theBlasi&relation(ref.
~e 1~4=W
()— = 0.0225—peu: ue~
12)is
[45)
—.. —
22 NACATN3712
.Thisformulacanbeextendedtoa~oximatethecompressibleflowovera smi-infiniteplatebyevaluat~thefluidprop&rtiesata suitable .meantemperatureTm {refs.10,11,and13)giv@
or
where
1~4=W
()
‘m= 0.0225~pmu: ue~
lp‘w ()‘e— = 0.0225Q .-peu: Ueb
Franreference13,a reasonableestimatefor Tm is
Tm= 0.5{TW+ Te)-I-0.22(Tr-Te)
(46a)
(46b)
(47)
Whenthewallismom!.ng,thelogicalextensionofequation(46b)istousevelocitiesrelative
Tw
pe(ue-Uw)z
to thewall..Thus,
() 1/4‘e= 0.0225Q
Ille-a#
or
Equations(48)are~ressed,asindicatedtoensurethat%W hasthesameSigrlas Ue -~, whichistobeexpectedfromphysicalconsidera-tions. Substitutionofequation[4Sb) intoequation(44)permitsthelattertobe integrated,for Tw ‘constant,giving - --
(49)
-.-.—-. . . .______ ____ --
.
10)‘U-Jto
.
.
NACATN3712
Otherboundary-layerparametersofinterestare
23
+=o.w60:~l-,&y,l-uJue,3/5(&j’5(50.,peue
*‘e_ db‘e F
* ()1 TJ-Uu 4f5= 0.0460~ Q e
5 e[~
TheheattransferatthewallcanbeestimatedusingaReynoldsanalogy. Forcompressibleflowovera semi-infiniteflatplate,theReynoldsanalogymsybeexpressedas (ref.13)
Whenthewallmoves,anestimateoftheheattransferfrom
c M(TW-Tr)o-m-2~3%“p’ue-~ ‘w
[!IL)
mightbe obtained
(52)
ItispointedoutintheCORRELATIONOFlZ!lTAsectionthattheexponentof am shouldprobablydecreaseh maguitudewithticreasing#ue.
TherecuverytemperatureTr isyettobedetermined.~ snalogywiththeturbulentflowovera semi-infiniteflatplate,Tr msybeestimatedas(ref.13)
where
(53b)
Equation(53a)issolvedbyiterationsincec and r{O)arefunc-tionsof Tr. FortheMminsr-boun@-layer~~e, r(0)increasedwith
.— ---- —. . .. —
24
snincreaseh U.#Ie.Thisestinater(0)atthehigher
W TN3712
suggeststhatequation(53b)mightunder-valuesof U&e. However,equation{53b)
isprobablywell.withintheaccuracyoftheotherassumptionsreq@?edtosolvetheturbulent-boundary-layerequations.
Wallsurfacetemperature.-Forconvenience,itwasassumedduringthecourseoftheturbulent-boundary-hyersolutionthatthewallsur-facetemperaturewasconstsntwith x.-The
be i&estigatedbysolvingforthewsdllsminarboun&my@er .
validityofthisassumptiontemperatureaswasdonefor uwula
Eqyatingequations(52)and{30),plus
~ -Tb B[(T~~)
equation(46b),gives
-1]..%-= 1 +-B
()‘B & ‘0(B2)(54) .
where
IhJ3iethe laminar-boundary-l.s#ercase,B varieswithx. Therefore,T#~ varieswithx,whichcontradictstheoriginalassumptionsunderwhichequations(54)werederived.However,equatioqs(54)cambeusedtoestablishtheconditionsumderwhich~ isnearlyequalto Tb. Theproceduretofollowisto evaluatetherightsideofequations(54)assuming~ = ~. (Eqs.(33)areapplicable.) Iftheresultingvaluefor(~ -Tb)/~ M _ (e”g*>less~ 0=1‘orW ‘iWs ‘f xunderconsideration),thentheass-ion ofa constantwalltemperatureisreasonablyaccurateandthesolutionindicatedbyequations(54)isvalid.
Theconditionsunderwhichthewalltemperaturebehinda strongshockwave(~ >>1, ~ue ~ 6)remainsessentiallyatitsoriginalvaluewZllnowbedetermined.Assumep isproportimalto T,Tw
~ isconstant,a = 1,y = 1.4,=Tb, ti ~=1/[(1 +b-c) (N-t-1)].
Thelatteristheleadingterminthe~ansionfor ~ whenequations.
(D3]and{D4)ofa~endixD areused.ThefolhwingrehtionsCanthenbeobtained: .
—. .— —— . . . . .. — —
NACATN3712 25
.
-fEic)
.
.
~ 351~2()
-—23 for (u#e) = 6
EvaluatingB for ~ue = 6 andsubstitutingintoequations(54)yield,for $>> 1,
Assumethef&idtobeairandthewalltobecastiron,bothinitiallyat ~=5w13* Itisconsistentwiththeassumptionsof pa
usingthepropertyvaluesofreference7 for ~ = ~ = 530°R.tion(56)becomes
Kc,cr=l,
OOOU04,
Eqw-
(57)
Thus,when~ islarge,thewdl surfacetemperaturewillremainwithin10percentofitsoriginalvaluefor (xu&e)3~10#<0(104).
‘!l?heprecedingsolutimrequiresthatthewallthicknessbeatleastgreaterthanthewallthermal-boundary-layerthiclmess(eq.(36)).
..—.--— .—.— — —
26 .
- CORRELATION(X?lM!M
Ih ordertocorrelatethebehinda wave,itisnecessaryacterizesthefluw. -
Considerthe t,~-dia@m
Wave
NACATN3712
.
data pertainingtotheboundarylayertodefjneaReynoldsnudberwhichchar-
fortheflowbehinda wave(sketch(a)).particlepath
: (externalflow)
=xSketch(a) ,
Anexpsnsimwaveisindicatedh sketch(a)forconvenience.Whenaparticleoftheexkrnalstreamhasmoved‘arelativetothewall,itisa distancex =behindthewave. Thus,5= X(l-u#le)isspendingtoa givenx)whichcharacterizesment. similarly,(~ -Ue)theveloci@oftothewdl isthecharacteristicvelocity.thenbedefjnedas Re= ~(ue-u#w or
a physicaldimension(corre-theboundary-layerdevelop-theexternalflowrelativeTheReynoldsnunibermsy
Re= (UeX/Vw)(l-U#Ue)2 (58)
wherev isarbitrarilyreferencedtothewalltemperature.Eqyation(58)reducesto Re= {uex/vw)for ~ = O. Eqmtion(58)differsby
J%thefactoru fromtheReynoldsnmiberdefinedby equations(32)ofreference1. For ~ue = 1,theReynoldsnumberofreference1 agreeswithequation(58),butforothervaluesof ~ue, thetwoReynoldsm.mibersdiffer.M particular,theReynoldsnuuiberofreference1be-comeshftiiteas ~ + O. Hence,equatian(58)appearstobeamoreusefulfo?ml. I
Thecorrelationofthelaminar-boundary-~erskin-frictionandheat-transferdataWJ1.nowbe indicated.Thelocalskin-frictioncoef-ficientmsybedeftiedu
‘wCf=
[2+Pw~- Ue)(59)
~mco
.
.,
.—— —________ ____ ____ _____ ....-. .. ___ _____ .- ___ -_ -.
NACATN3712
Therefore,usingequations(16a),(58),md (59),
f.@ . amw-Id‘e-1 I
27
wherecf-@ ispositiveifthewallshearisinthe-f-x-direction.Equation(60)ispositivefor O< ~~< 1 andnegativeforu#e> 1. Themagnitudeof cf-@””at u#e = O to1.128at ~ue = 1equations{16)and{27),theReynolds
for 0< 4 Ue< 1>
&creasesmonotonicdd.yfrom0.664and2.291at ~ Ue = 6. Ustiganalogyc= bewrittenas,
- Ue (Uw)0.65-0.15{U#Ie)q~\.
‘r%,wF~— = 1Ww
for 1< 4 Ue< 6,
%%-ue~Tw-Tr cp,w
{61a)
{61b)
Theexponentof uw isseentodecreasefroma valueof0.65at
4 u =0 toavslueofO.39at U#e= 6.eByusingequticm(50a),togetherwiththedefinitionsof Re end
cf asgiv~byeq@i~ (58)~d (59)>theturbtie.ntskinfrictioncanbeexpressedas
TheReynoldsanalogypraposedfortheturbulentcaseisgivenbyequa-tion(52),whichmqfberewrittenas
#
[63)
... .— . —__ ______
28 NACATN3712
Comparisonofequations(61)and(63)suggests(exceptfortheuseofameanreferencetemperatureineq.(63))thatthe~cment of rJmshould .
decreaaewithincreashg~ue. However,theuseoftheexponent2/3isprobablywithintheaccuracyoftheotherassumptionsinvolvedh theturbulent-boundary-layerSIl&&SiS.
Inreference4,theboundarylayerbehindawavewasestimatedbyusingtheconceptof“auequivalentsemi-infiniteflatplate.” Thatis,reference4 assumed“...thepropertiesofa lsminaoffluidb theshocktubewhichhaabeeninmotionwitha velocity(ue-~) fora timetareequivalenttothoseofa laminaoffluidwhichhasprogressedresr-wardfora periodoftime t fromthelead5ngedgeofa semi-tnfiniteflatplateina steadyflowwithfree-streamvelocity{u=-~) ....”For thelaminarcase,thisis equivalentto replacingeq&bim (60)by
%J1- UeCf+ = 0.664
}1-%/”el ‘
whi’chisaccuratefor due << 1,butunderestimtestheshearbyafactorof1.7at UJue = 1 am bya factorof3.4at u#ue = 6. Fortheturbulentcase,thisisequivalenttousingequation(62),butwith
/( )e /%J5
evaluatedfor ~ue = O. Ifthevarbtionoffluidstate‘e
prop-irties-is
whichhastherespectively.
neglected,equation
p+lfs (= 0.05771
(62)canbeexpressedas
1/5 1- (u#le)
)2%
‘7= 11- (~”e)l(65)
values0.0577,0.0607,and0.0705at u#ze= 0,1,snd6,1/5 for ~f”eThefactthatthevaluesof cpe =0 and
1 &er relativelylittlesuggeststhattheequivalentflat-plateap-proachmsygivereasonableestimatesfortheturbulentboundarylsyerbe-hinda weakwave.Anotherinterpretatimisthat(bycomparisonwiththebminarsolution)thepresentmethodunderestimatesthewallshearforvsluesof ~/~ &herthanthosesatisf@ng~ue << 1. Notethattheseventh-powerveloci~profileandtheBlasiusrelationbetweenshesrandboundsry-~rthiclmess(eq.(45))applytofullydevelopedturbulentpipeflowaswellastotheturbulentflowovera semi-infiniteflatplate.Itishopedthattheseqressionsaresufficientlyuniver-salsothattheycsnbeusedherefiwithoutmodtiication,excepttousevelocitiesrelativetothewall.Thevalidityofthisapproachmustultimatelybeverifiedbyexperiment. ,.
NACATN3712 29
CONCLUDINGREMARKS
mInmto
Theboundarylayerbehinda shockorthinexpansionwavemovingintoa stationaryfluidhasbeenstudied.Bothlamharandturbulentboundarylayerswereconsidered.Thewallt~eraturebehindthewaveswasalsoinvestigated.
Forstrongshockwaves,theboundarylsyerbehindtheshockwillgeneraldyhaveverylargetemperaturegradientsnormaltothewall.Theassumptionsuponwhichthelaminar-boundary-layersoluticmswereobtained(eqs.(8))maythenhavetobereevaluated.ItmaybepossibletoobtainmoreaccurateestimatesofthelsminarboundarylayerbyusingsomemesareferencetemperaturesasdiscussedinappendixC. Thechoiceoftheappropriateemeantemperaturemightbeobtainedfromeither~erimentaldataorbycomparisonwithmoreaccurateintegrationsofthelaminar-boundary-~erequations.
Theturbulent-boundary-layersolutionspresentedhereinrepresentanextensionofempirical,semi-infiniteflat-plate,boundary-layerdatatothecasewherethewa13.ismoving.Thebasicassumptions(especiallythoseincorporatedineqs.(40),(41),and(48))mustultimatelybever-ifiedby~eriment,particularlyforthecaseofstrongshocks.
Itshouldalsobenotedthatthefluidbehinda verystrcmgshockmaybedissociated.Suchdissociationintroducescmplexitiesofthebuundary-layerproblemthatarebeyondthescopeofthisreport.Exper-imentalstudiesoftheboundarylayerbehindverystrongshockswouldyieldfundamentalinformationrelatingtoboundary-layerdevelopmentina dissociatedfluid.
LewisFlightPropulsionLaboratoryNationalAdvisoryCommitteeforAeronautics
Cleveland,Ohio,February16,1956
. . . . ..— . ..-—___ ._ . —.-—
30
A
a
B
b
c
‘f
CPerfc
f
%k
M
P
q
R
Re
r
s
T
Tm
Tr
t
Al?l?lmmxA
SYMBOLS
functiondefinedbyeq.(32b)
localspeedofsound
NACATM3712
functiondeftiedby eqs.(54)
functiondefinedbyeqs.(41)
functiondeftiedbyeqs.(41)
local.skh-frictioncoefficient,‘c4 ; Pw(~ -ue)2
spectiicheatatconstsntpressure
complimentaryerrorfunction
functionof q definedbyeq.(~)
integraldefinedbyeq.(43)whereN=6,7,or8
thermalconauctivi~
kh nuniberinx,y-coordhatesystem,MeS (ue/ae),etc.
~essure
rate ofheattrsnsferin+y-direction
gasconstxmt
.
—
Reynolds
function
function
absolute
absolute
absoluteOR
lxhlle
definedbyeqs.(15)
definedby eqs.(I-5)
statictemperature,%
meanstatictemperature(e.g.,eq.(47)),%
wallsurfacestatictemperatureforzeroheattransfer,
●
,.
\—
NACATN3712 31
velocitiesparallel
velocityof&ll in
velocitiesparallel.
velocityofwaveh
tox,y-sxes
x,y-coordinatesystem
8yT3tem
coordhatesstationarywithrespecttowave(fig.l(b))
coordinatesstationarywithrespecttowall(fig.l(a))
d~fusivity,k/pep
ratioofspecificheats
wallthermal-boundary-layerthicknesscorrespondingtoT-%=099~-Tw “
fluidvelocity-boundary-layerthicknesscorrespontigU-%=099ue-~”
to
fluidthermal-boun~-layerthicknesscorrespondingtoT -TwTe -Tw=O*gg
fluidvelocity-boundary-layerthicknessfromPohlhausenviewpoint
fluidboundary-layerdisplacementthickness,J=(l-&).
similarityparameterforintegralsolutionof
s-ity parameterforintegralsolutionofyp5
sindl.arityparameter,eq.(5)
valueof q correspondingto
fluidboun~-layermomentum
Y= 6
Jw
thickness,o ()pu ~-uw
peue ‘e
. . — .- ___ _
32 NACATN3712 .
v coefficientofviscosity
v kinematicviscosity
P massdensi~
a Prandtlnuniber,pep/k
TV localshearstressexertedbyfluidonwall
9 functiondeftiedbyeq.(46b)
w stresmfunction(eqs.(4))
Stiscripts:
b undisturbedflowaheadofwave
e flowexternaltofluidboundarylqer
m quantityevaluatedat ~
w quantityevaluatedjust
o- quantityevaluatedjust
Superscripts:
f denotesdifferentiation
Specialnotation:
0( ) orderofma@ituae
abovewallsurface,y = 0+
belowwallsurface,y = O-
withrespectto q
.
.
.
-.. —. —.. .— .. .. .. ———— .——. —----- -——-
NACATN3712 33
APPENDIXB
Forconvenience,useful
WAVE-IONS
equatims relatingconditionsacrossa wavearenotedherein.%ockwaves‘andexpansia~ves areconsideredseparately.
Shockwave(~/~ > 1).-Cmsidertheflowinthex,y-coordinatesystem(i.e.,coordinatesystemmovingwiththeshock).Letsubscriptb designatetheundistu??bedflowupstreamoftheshockwaveand
%=% ‘e
%T% Te>ae)Pe———
/’/
/////[//////////// /// -x, u
subscripte theflowdownstreamoftheshockwaveandexternaltotheboundarylqyer.Notethat~ = ~ sothat~ = ~~ = #~ ● ~=>fromordinaryshock-wavetheory,
% (r+ I)@—=ue (T-1)%+2
&=—,
$ }for y = 1.4
+5
(Bl)
4 w‘e=(r +u - (r - W#J5u#ue
=6- (~”e) }
for y = 1.4
(B2)
-——_ . .._ —— —.—
34 NACATN3712
.
$e= (Y +1)(%/:,)-(Y -u
5 1for y = 1.4= 6(u&e) -1
(Y+ l)(~”e)- (Y-1,
(uJuel[(Y+ 1)- (r-W+,/%)]
6(~/~) -1
}for y = 1.4
(%#e)~ - (#ueJ
(B3)
(.JCnco
(B4)
-Sire wave(uJw) c 1). - Theexpansionwaveisassumedtohavenegligiblethickness.Inthe ~)~-coordinatesystem(i.e.,fixedwithrespecttowaU),theactuslaudassumedformoftheexpansionwaveisasfollow8: .
BQansionwave
Actualexpansionweve
The &Lscontinul.tymoveswith
fluid.Conditionsoneithersameaashownfortheactualfollo~ figureapplies:
.-
Assumedqansionwave
veloci@ ;d = -y intotheundisturbedsideoftheassumedacpsnsionwavearethewave.h thex,y-coordinatesystemthe
%> % %T ae~Pee}/-—————
OH x,u(///~///////~////”/’ “’”~
.
--——— .- .. — ..—. .
.I?ACATN3712
ThestatepropertiesacrossthewavearedefhedbytheisentropicT-1 y -1
relationsa~~ = (Te/~)1/2= (Pe/~)~ = (p~~)~. Otherequa-tionsoftiterestare
Pe—=
‘[ 176(u#e) -1=
5u#ue ifor T = 1.4
%—=‘e
[ 11- (U#e} */(r-l)l-y+ =7z-
Me=
((r +1) -k-e;%)Td &
11/7
-)(’/ 1
for T = 1.46 -5(Pe/1#
\2 I
(r +MJ#e) - (r - u\
5
Jfor y = 1.4
6(u#e) -1
\Te
[
1-=1
1- (u#le)2—=
2~
‘[ 16(%J%)-12‘=TW7 1for y = 1.4
35
(B6)
(B8)
- --—..—— .-. -—.- —— _. -—
36 NACATN3712
AePENmXc
LMINAR-BOUNDARY-LAYERSOLUTION
TOAMEANTEM5RATURE
InthebodyofthisY?eJ)Ort,thelaminar-boundary-layersolutionwasobtainedbyassmingthat p and k areproportionalto T andthat C and C areconstant,allreferencedtowa12conditions(eqs.(8)).~p questiannaturallyarisesastowhethertheuseofameanreferencetemperature~ wouldleadtomoreaccuratecorrela-tionswithexact(inregtitofluidproperties)integrationsofthelaminar-boun&ry-@erequations.
If a man reference temperatm isusedinbecome
where
equations(16),they
(cl)
%=-S’(0)(TW- Tr}fsf!q,)
H‘e ‘m ‘m—=—Ue
lim(q-f)+(~-)~$,mf”rd,+Pe he ~+.
o
Tr ()%?“12 Ugr(o)
~=1+~- 2TCe p,m
(C2)
(C3)
(C4)
andthesolutionsfor r and s areconsideredfunctionsof am. Xnreference13,itisfoundthatthechoice
Tm= 0.5(TW-tTe)+ 0.22(Tr-Te) (C5)
.
“
-. -. .— .- ——.—. ..-— ———.
,.
.-
Cn%’to
.
.
NACATN3712 37
correlatedequations(Cl)and(C2)withaccurateintegrationsoftheboundary-layereoyations.Flowpasta semi-infiniteflatplateisconsideredtherein.Equation(C5)shouldalsoprovideimprovedestimatesfor %W and ~ for U#e +.O. X ve/ueistobecorrelatedwithaccurateintegrationsoftheboundary-layerequationsanotherestimatefor Tm mightbecalledfor.Notethatequation(C5\definesthemeantemperaturewhichwasusedintheturtmlent-boundary-l.ayeranalysis.
38 NACATN3712
APPENDIXD
*7
.
Thetu@bulent-boun&&-layeranalysisrequiresevaluationofthetitegral
J’1%=Z%z
o l+ bz-cz2(43)
whereN=6,7,0r8, andQ b=:-l
Thedenoyinatorofequatiau(43)maybefactoredsothat(-C)(X - X)(X - ~) = l+bx - CX2 where
‘ ‘*(b+Fc)
‘=+F-F)
fromphyzic.a,l~ztsb> -1,c%), md 0<
beshownthat f3<0 and X>l. Egpation(43)— < 1. It canthenl~bcannowbewrittenas
where
J1Z%Z%,p= —z-$o
J1
%,xz +Oz
i
(Dl)
,
.
— -. .—. ..— .._ . .-—.- ____ --———- . ..
WA TN3712 39
.
mk!?to
Thejntegrm ~, ~ and ~,~ canbe integratedasfollows:
(D2a)
(DZb)
Thelogarithmtermisveryhesrlyequalendo~ositetothesummationte?nn,inequations(D2a)and(D2b),forvaluesof j3notclosetozeroandvaluesof X notcloseto1,respectively.Hence,eachofthesetermsmustbeevaluatedveryaccuratelyinordertogetaccurateesti-matesof %,B ~d ~,~. Forvaluesof ~ notclosetozeroandval-uesof k notcloseto”1,slternateexpressionsfor lN,$ ad- IN,kareQesirable.Since~ <0,
m
1 L N !m!()
lm‘1-p N+m+ l)! l-B-
1
~[ (1+ 1! ‘
= [N+ 1)(1- j3 + ● -1-N+ 2)(1- ~~ 1(N+ 3)(N212)(1- j3)2 ““”
{D3)
., ..“.”. ,
●
✎� ✎✎✿✿✿✿✿ ✿✿✿ ✿✿✿��
�����
40 NACATN3712
SinceA >1,
‘ T~-(N+l)~(N+m)&+m+lj(~~]‘(N+l)(l-A
1
J[ (1- (N+ 1) (N+ 1)
‘IN+l)(l-A N + 1)(N+2)X- 1(N+2)(N+3)A2 - ““”
(D4)
Eqyations(D3)and(D4)convergerapidlyfor f3<c O ad X >>1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
ImmREmcm
Mireh, Harold.:knhar Boun~ @er wind Shock”AdVSZICillgintoStationaryFluid.NACATN3401,1955.
Donaldson,ColemanM?., andSull.ivsa,RogerD.: TheEffectofWallll%ictionontheStrengthofShockWavesinT@es sndHydraulicJ-s inChannels.NACATN1942,1949.
Hollyer,RobertN.,Jr.:A StudyofAttenuationh theShock‘Mibe.Eng.Res.Jhst.,Uhiv.ofMichigan,J@ 1,1953.(U.S.Navympt.$OfficeNatiRes.Contra&No.N6-ONR-232-TOIV,Proj.M720-4.)
Trimpi,RobertL.,sndCohen,NathanielB.: A TheoryforPredictingtheFlowofRealGasesinShock‘[email protected],1955.
chap, DeanR.,andIbibesin,MorrisW.: TemperatureandVelocityProfilesintheCompressibleLsminarBmndaryIqerwithArbitraryDistributionofSurfaceTemperature.Jour.Aero.Sci.,vol..16,no.9,Sept.1949,pp.547-565.
Luw,GeorgeM.: - Cmressfil-e~ BoundaryLsyerwithHeatTransferandSmallPressureGradient.NACATN3028,1953.-
IWamian,RichardA.: SomeViscousEffectsh Shock-TubeFlow.M.s.Thesis,Cornw WT.> Jbne1954.
..
. . ..- —. —__ _.. . . . ... . . . ___ ..__ _______ ____ . . . .-
NACATN3712 41
. 8.
9.
10.
yB
12.c)
. 13,
Rott,N., andHartunianJR.: OntheHeatTransfertotheWallsofaShockTiibe.GraduateSchoolofAero.Eng.,CornellUniv.,Nw.1955. (ContractAI?33(038)-21406.)
Eckert,E.R.G.: lhtroductiontotheTrsnsferofHeatandMass.McGraw-Hill.BookCo.,bc.,1950,pp.266-275.
Tucker,Maurice:ApproximateCalculationofTurbulentBoundsry-LqyerDevelopmentinCompmssibleFlow.NACATN2337,1951.
B*z, D.R.: AnApproximateSolutionofCompressibleTurbulentBoundsry-LqwrDevelopmentandConvectiveHeatTransferinConvergent-DivergentNozzles.Trans.A.S.M.E.,vol.77,no.8,NOV.1955,~. 1235-1245.
Schlichttig,H.: LectureSeries“BoundaryLsyerTheory.” Pt.II-TurbulentFlows. NACATM1218,1949.
Eckert,ErnstR.G.: SurveyonHeatTransferatHighSpeeds.Tech.Rep.54-70,Aero.Res.Lab.,WrightAirDev.Center,Wright-PatterscmAirForceBase,Apr.1954.
..— —— — —.
‘42.
lW2ATN 3712
Ww.iE1.- LAMINARBOUNDARYLAYERBEHINDWAVE(EQS.9AND15)
(a)solutionfor #ue = oSrmWltl0mb6r *. 0.72
n f f~ r“Jv”a ‘
-r1 msn a -s~
0.0 0.0.0:; Oaooo Oj:;: O&m: 0.8477 mm: Goooo I.tltl;:; .0470
::;:;
.0094.e461 .0979
.09s9.0211
.46Q3 ~691 a414 .063S .2916 ,9164 .4179.140s A6n6 2529 a334 .09s1 .aola a746 .4i7a
z .0375 .1!376 A673 .3357 .a2a4 za64 .3666 .6329 .4166
s .0506 .X4::%6
A650.0R44
.4173 .2082 367a .4470 .7915 .4isaA617 .497a
3.7009
.1147 .3a65a87a .aa4a .7499 .4130
B .1497.457a .ss:; .77 a
~ s16a .a97a .7na7 .4 01.3720 .4s12 .76 a a437 S666 .S679 i
9 aa91 .4167 A&36 .7248.4 6a
.7aal .S694 .7314 .6a75 .4013
M .2.330 .4606 A344 .7956 .6.239 .aga9 .79az3.% .aasa .603s .4aT4 ae~s .6636 .3z3a
.6877 .3953a4R9 .s4as .3nao
I& .3 37z
s4sa.3 oa ii:t
9aa3.58S.6 sa97
.3317 9018 5+;+.379s
$%:IA .4s07 .6a44 3797 L0477
,3463 .9a10.36R1 .3s73
.3698S964 436a .3688
in ..~lso .561S .3618 i~oaz1.6 .s030 .6967 .34a5
.aa60ti5a9
.3646 U13n3 .4009.4894 >680
.346a
kz 52$3
L0766 3669~~:;; 38:2
.33311s2;1 3:2Z 3s:: ;ii$z ;?$$ 3iJf
19 .H064 .7900 .?783 iaa32 .3*OO .3sss 2a7a4 273a an6s?.0 .aOsa .S167 9ss7 K$1Q4
.969734s0 3444
.0411 2330 xfsaa1.19R4 34s9 a699
>112 .330s .zaaasz
a19a
p:
asa4
?a %833 ia 06 13ai7a 87
379z
196?4IA081 a4n p:! la60a
A9S4S789 9;::
2.4 .9011 a676 1431s .2199 1s!770 SS21 A991
i,3a24“ .916a a47s IAsal;2 3.4148
AQ33 . a5so L29a3 a330 la16.9306 aan6
gjji470a a6h9 .s337 13037 als7
M8;3 :$fE$ i!lbll.i64s
Me$t 9122 Sbiz 13338 :W- 3481?9 143990 .9616 DE06 1s1$4 .30R3 .i7n9 13317 .t176
30 1.79S6 .9691 &677m
laa14la9Pe .97sa
m~aa .2s14 133ns a6asDS63 1s899
.I037.0780 a3Yl 13443
;31S906
~sas,9a04
.090s
a.oHHe .9.9L6 $:$: 122:: :;t:z 2;: i 3z 401I s3a g:% W z
3A MR7S .9bC0 030s 1s45,0 S4S4 .oa63 13S66 D307 .0ss4
3.s aaFlf.4 .!!907 .oa4d3Se56
lp:: .0375 .0736 13s94 .0*S3
g
.9929 .0193 .0307 msaa 1.3617.0497
.oao7Yst?!? %;: f:gg
lssn3A4ao
=606 y;:AS2n43 z ;~;~; g]g; j~;~a.6n41 L5624 .0360
4a 2.7839 .997!3 ~069 1.s639&a
.ola9WII%:7
xia96 13s73 .00s7g9G4 moaa
mlao
;:
1.S6PI0 .0103 Da42 13680 D069 .0163~v;~: ;X; %jlg lyi~3aF134
3823 :::: 13::1 +’::: g;:j-0904 .noal .00.4Q 1369S48 X3533 .0996 .001s46 3.3833
1.66769?97
.003s.0011
ao99L3680
13690 4oa3 aos?.00?0 ao7s 13700 fioao nos3
% %:;s $a 9F.! 90
soonmoos ~::~ 38:? 3::4 3
1 70a1 703 1
DO SN:g
4.9 3.6n3aDO 1
.!!599 .0004 1.5686 .001s n036 13704 0009.S.n 3.7oia .0999 400s L5687 .0000 ~oaa 1>70s5a 3.S032 laooo .0002
DO06l.asae
J)019.0009 ooal 1>706
33S.U a
3 $$8:8 f%i000s
ZS68P0014
4.00a 35689 ::882 3:;; $3%: 0003 $tii
5.4 4-lS32 10000 aool 1.s6f19DOO
.0003 aoo9 23706 DOOa DO065.6 4.zo3a6.6
lnooo .0000 3s6894.383a lnooo
.000aaooo
00071.a6e9
13707 DOO1 0004.0001
5.7aoos 13707
4.4n3a 100CO aooo0001 0003
J& 4.6U32 lLIOUO .0000 z:::.0001 DO03.0001 .3003
:;;:;g:::
Dons39 4.A033
pooalnooo aooo 1.S690 .0001 nooa 13707 DOOO nool
&o 4.7a3a6.I
10000 aooo4an3a lDOOO
L36?00000 1.5690
.0000 0001
.0000 Dool ;;%7J30no nool
6aJlooo 0001
63 :2!3: lnoo8 4100laoo .0008 H%: aeon nooaeon 0008 K/;z; $::: 88:8
w
.
v
CAg
.
,—.—. .—. —___ ____ ___ ___ —— ----- — . .. . . ___
.
.
NACATN373.2
Tl&E1.-Continued.IAMIWARBOUNDARY
n f
aoooo:8Ui.0943
. .is4a.17n4
W;
.39s2
.4s90
:Es$i!.6707.7475.aa71.9093.993a1.oao41.16901.a893L36121.4444L531371.6S41L7303
H3Z3anaaea.la13
aaaol:m~
9.6175a7i7aaa170%91603.0167X11663.a165
23;%!~;::
3.716.s3.81643.9164401644.11644.a16431::4.51644.61644.7164%12:ao1646.1164
aa500:938s.37e3.4a05.46al
“8.50 9.54 9.6617.6193.6554
z.68 9.7a 6.7535.78a3ao90.6337.e56a.8765.6948.9111.9as4.9379.9468.9s61
.989s:i?333.9953.9965.99’?4.9961.9986.9990.9993.999s.999.999$.9998.9999.9999.9999>00001.000o3.0000%0000*8888Loooo1.000o
(b)Solutionfor
rg
o.4a9538?8.4a39.4191.41a6.40443943.38a4.3687.35s3
::W;
.?780
.a570a3s6.a14aa951.i7a6.xaaa.1341.I166.lOos.ons7.07a5
-%:8:.0413.0336
.oa70
.oazs
.0170
.0133
.0103
.0079
.0060
.0045
.0033
.ooa4
.0018
.0 138.0 09
.0006
.0005
.0003
.000a
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0000
$8::.0000.0000.0000%::$DOOO.0000
LAYERBEHINDWAVE(EQS.
‘%/Ue = 0.25
77=aoooo:f~fg.a567.3401
.7884
:8?33.965a1.o1591.06a5L1OSO1.1435i.i7aai,a09a1.s3671.a609tiaa21%30061.31661.3303
%34?:L360a1.367a
L3730k3zl+ma49L3a75i.3a96~39iaL39as;;;::
>39s0
l#2Efi3.396a%3964L3966L39671.396a%39691.39691.3969Ii/g?:L3970L3970Z3970
g$%:
L3970
r
. .m6trmmta
*1
.50s0
.64aaf%2.saai.4a66.44a4.4049.36s6.3a78a9ao.SSF13.aa70.lQald7za.14no
.osa6z
44 3.03 4.oaa7aa3a.ola6n14aal17~09ano7aDOS6
$:;3.ooaa.0019.0014DO1l.000a.0006.00040003$8:;.0001noolDOO18n 00
a 00nooo0000
aooooa$n.1396da3aaasaa649.3oo6.33a3.3s93.3a13.3 798.4 90
.4t4a
.4146
.4o96
.399a
.3as9
.36a3
.3479
.3as2
5%?asnaSasaao16a7R4~;:;
at7a
4010%%:.06074s0s.0417,034a.oa7a.oaas.olao.0143
::aii$.0069.00s4.0041.0031.ooa4aola.0013DO1O.0 078.0 05.0004.0003.000ano 1
8.00 1nool.0000
43
9 AND15)
7-,0.72 i
86n
Onooo2$88a776L$601
9646S9S4lDa30%047slD69a
ti971ti97ati97aU973la973
a
1.000o3383aS06.5013.7sa4.704a.6s6a.6103.56S0sao93381.397a.3603.3a4a.s913.66oos30aao3aa7a9AS63..13s7a171.1006.oas6
Sz:f43s14.04aa
.03s4:Uzi.0193.01S6.olas.0099.0079.oo6a.oo4a.0037.ooa9.ooaa.0017.0013.0010.0007.0005.0004.0003.000a.0001.0001.0001.0001.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000
U99698+3.4949.4909Aaa4.44;:.4s9s
.34s1
.3a4a
.30a8
.aaloa.s9i
.06aa$3::.0409.0340
.oaao
.oaso
.ola7
.01s1
.olal
.00961
$8Zi.0047.0036.ooaa.ooal~016mola.0009DO07Boos4003~ooaJlool.0001
$8:$pooo.0000
. . —.-—..— . .--t
——. . - .—
—.
44 NACATN 3’712
TABLE1.-Continued.LAMINARBOUNDARYLAYERBEHINDWAVE(EQS.9AND15)(c)Solutionfor u ue= 0.50d
3ru6u ~ 8“, 0.76
n r rt“ r“ xran r -rF 860 s. -6*
aoooo 0.s000 03ae7 0.0000 oa7a7
~
lwooo:Ii:f Z?Zzt
Omooo 3.0000 aa66s::;: ?
JI 7a a696Z 46 .S640 z
.06 1.1647
4::? .94s4.s979
La o .8870 A::f.3590 .s451 .iaz7 .a746 .a310
.4.5!36a
,aa61 .6a97 “-’.3147 .34a5 .aa4i .8s70 .3s49 .77s7 .a490.a906 .6607 soa7 4a37
$.797a .aa?a .4a9a .7a13
m: ::;8; :~:g :j;:.53a9
:~gg; 34:!? .49R.563i :g;g; W:: .5783
.403a .6aa5.774s .asaa .7%53 .5509 .4aaa .6766 .517a .476o
.6!371 .7996 .3.4a7 .77aa .607ag m; 22:8
.4449 .7a60m: 5?8?
.4706m! ti~:g
.4s’s3g:: :48$8 AM!I
.S649 .19al .9401 .4soa1A
.3443 .3047.9945 .8a33 .1746 sa49 Az67 .4397 .aaoa .3071 .3s9arma37 .8999
z.1s74 ma54 .3ass .4a33 .909a .a7as
Mziz .9147 .34 6.3333
.92ao !.za 4 l%~iz 3:;? s~i! 5Z4Z Mg 38::La 1.3600 .9397 .109119
Liaa4 .s666L454S .9499
.35Z6 9771.094s
.aa62L1474 .a3aa .3a34 .9943 .1s90
aD 3.s499 .9sa7.a3i4
,0816 Lls91 .s019 .s94s . 1.0091 .z37aU M:;: f
.9 62 .069? B!z% :!;: .g!j$;
.ao77.9 26 .osa m:; :18:8 :Iiii
a> sa407 .97ao ,0491 I.*I77a~ L93a7
aloz *oas4 4440.9aa5 .0406 Laa93 .1o67 .ia45 Losoo L0719
as.ias7
ao371 .9a61:$
.033s33:3
La39z.9a92
-oa95 .1606 1.0S66 .060a.9916 :::;4 %%!13 2ZI+ A3a7
.zoa9.ilaa E:zi :g:!a :8M1
BS a.334aB9 S4336
.993s .0173 LSS97.9951 .0136 4));: .LOloLS643
L0704 .0340.oasa 1.073S .oa77
.;O;:
a.a3sa .9963 .0106
;La6ao 4336
a-aa9.0713
z.997a .ooa
5L0760 .oaas
p#{;.0479
27 a6 .9979 ;006 2;;+ as93.04a9 %z;~ :81fl $38:u aa3as .99as .004s i.a7s4 0173 .0400 i.oao9 .01165.4 ~93a3 .99a9
.oa6a.003s La770 a137 .03as Loeao .0091 .oaia
s sosaa .999a3.z3aa
.00~6 la7aa .0107 .oa6a.9994 .0019 LS791
i.08aa .oo7a ,0176.ooa4 .oato
g
1.os34 .00S6 .0141xa al
353 al %:$0014 L679molo Laaoi
.0065 .0167 soa39
.00s0 .oz3a Loa43 :8843 :::~ga43al S99a .0007 Laao9 .oo3a .0104 %0646 .ooas ,0069
Lo x53ax .9999 aooa raala .ooa9 .ooal6.1 3.63ao .9999
i.084a .0019.0004
.00s4uaaz5
s.ooaa .ootia L0850
MI~8 %.001s .004s
c: :s $8$? k%i: 3:%8 :88:2 HH4 :88ii :88~2L.4 x93ao LooOO .0001 raa29 .0009 .ooan zoa53 .000s ~ooza
M 403ao LOOOO .0001 iaaao6$
.0007 .ooai6i3ao %0000 Alooi
soa53 .0004i.aaai .0005
6.7.001s
;0014
4a3ao LooOO .0000 i,aaaisoas3 .0003 .0010
La 433ao 1.000o nooo Laaal.0004 .0011 Loa54.0003 .000a %oa54 :8::2
u 443ao Loooo .0000 tiaaa:::82
.nooa .0006
3s
i.oas44s3ao
.0001LoOOO .0000
ilLaaaa
.0004
463ao LOOOO aooo Laaaa.0001 .0004 Loa54 .0001 .0003
!:
.0001 .0003 Loas4473ao p::
.0001 .000a43000
4fi3ao Laaaa.0000 Laaaa
.0001 .000a i.oas4 8.0 00493ao
.000a.0001
LOOOO .0000 iaaaa.000a Loa54 .0 00 .0001
.0000 .0001 Loa54 .0000 .0001M so3ao LOOOO .0000 Laaaa .00005s a13ao
.0001 Loas4 .0000 .00011.000o .0000 Laaaa .0000
pj
.0001 Loa54 .0000 .0000
X%8 $wl .000.0008 gwg m! y:: ml :gu~lj 3888s43ao .0000 ,0000
m s53ao LOOOO .0000 Laaaam &6320 LOOOO
.0000.0000 haaaa
.0001 Loa54 .0000 .0000.0000 .0000 fioas4 .0000 .0000
.
——— .. ___ ____ _______ ..__ -_
NACAm 3712 45
.TABILE1. - Continued.LAMINARBOUNDARYLAYERBEHINDWAVE(EQ13.9 AND15)
(d)Solutionfor U#ue = 0.75
-.— .. —- ____ .= —
46 N/WATN 3~2.
TABLE1.- Continued.
(e)
BOUNDARYLAYERBEHINDWAVE(EQS.9 AND15)
Solutionfor u#ue = 2 (ref.1)
Pr8n6tlnumber~, 0.72n r fw f“
0.0 0.0.0:: 2.0000 -3..0191 0.0000.l
aa997 o~::g 0.00001.8964
1.000o 0.ss18-lao91 .oe97 .s922 .095e .9151
.3798 1.798a.a45a
5-.9804 .1780 .s704 .2S61 .1831 .0313
.5!348 1.7oa9 -.9356 .a634.aa79
.8356.4
.4o60 .a6at .7490 .8004.7a05 L61al -.a777 .3447 .7896 .5043 .3331 .671S .7645
.5 .s-774 1.5276 -a203 .4alo .7356 .5758 .3965 .697a
.6 1.oa63.7ai7
1.4503 -.7367 .4916 .6755 .6a09 .45a7 .5a74 .6739.7 i.1677 U804 -.6601 .5560 .62aa.s 1.3oa6 1.3163 -.s834
.:6;: .50aa .46a5 .6aa7.6141
.9S480
1.4316 1.a637 -,5088.5454
.6657 .4049.40a9 .5697
.6a06 .5aa9 .3466 .516a
Lo 1..55S6 La164U
.7111 .4a4i:$:::
.587a .6153 .a996 .4636L6751 1.li’59 .7507 .3676 .s455 .6430L791O
.aasoU4L6 -s135
.4ia7
z.7648 .3155 .4974 .6666 .ai70 .3643
1..9O36IA
&;;2.0137
-a606-ai4a
.0139 J3683 .4465 .6866
.8366 2a6a .3953.i6a9
.7034 .1531 ::%2;
La aza16 LO699 -d74a2aa78
.8594 .i89am54a
3456 .7174 .la74 .a386
z-z 40a .6766 .1570 .2900 .7290
as3a6 1.0417 ‘1116.1063 .ao40
l.a a436a 1.0317 -s879.8909 .la93 .2556.soa6 .1067
.7305.88::
.0064.7463
w as390 i.oa39 -s686 .9iaa.070,s :;:::
.08s8 .75a7 .057a .iai9
a.o 2.6411 1.0179 -.05a9 SW:; .069a as’14 .7570 .0460U a.74a6 1.0133 -.0404 .0554
.ioia~aso .76ao
a.a 2.a438 1.0097 ‘.0306 .9310.0366 .0833
.0441 .ioa4 .76S3 .oa93ag446 1.0071
.0602
z xo45a-.oaa9
Loos%.93s0
-.0170.0348 .oe3a .7679.oa73
.oa3i .05s3.9381 .0671 .7699 .oiel .0446
a.s 3s4S6 1.0036a.6
-.ola4 .9405 .oa23 .os3e .771s .01413s4s9 1.ooa6 -.0090 .94a4 .016S .04a7
.03s7.77aa
2’7 3346a 1.0010 ‘.006S .9438 .oia7.0109
.0337.oa04
.7737 .0004 .oaa43.4463 ;::;:
?9 3.5464‘.0046 .9449 .0097 .oa64 .774s-.0033 .94S8 .0073
.0064.oaos
.017s.77s0 .0049 .0136
3D 3.646S 1.0006 -.ooa3 .9464 .00ss .01S8 .77s53.1 3.7465 1.0004 ‘.0016 .9469
.0037.0041 .oial
.010s.77S8
3JI 3S466 laoo3 -.0011 .9473.ooa6 .0081
.0031 .oo9a .776o .ooao33 3S 466 zaooa -.0007 .947s
.0061.ooa3 .0070
3.4 4.0466 lnool -.0005 .9477.776a
.0017 .oosa.001s
.7763.0046
.0011 .003s
3s 4.1466 1.0001 -.0003 .9479 .ooza .0039 .7764 .0008345 4.2466
.ooa6lJJOOO
4.3466-moos .s480 .0009 .ooa9 .776s
1.0000.0006 .0019
M-J3001 .9480 .0006 .ooal .776S
4.4466.0004 .0014
1.000039
-,oooi .94014S466
.000s .001s .7766 .0003 .00101.0000 -.0001 .94s1 .0003 .0011 .7766 .000a .0007
4.0 4.6466 1.0000 .0000 .94aa .000a .Oooe .7766 .00014> .94t3a .000a
.000s.0006 .7766 .0001
4.2 .940a .0001 .0004.0004
.7766 .000143 .94aa
.0003.0001 .0003 .7766 .0001
4A .946a .0001.000a
.000a .7766 .0000 .0001
4s .94sa .0000 .0001 .7767 .00004$ .94sa .0000
.0001.0001 .7767 .0000
4.7 .94ea .0000.0001
.0001 .7767 .00004.2 .94.5a .0000
.0000.0000 .7767 .0000
49.0000
.
..— .. -.
.,
—.—. .-—..
.
.
NACATN3~2
TABLE1.- Continued.LAMINAR
47
LAYERBEHINDSHOCKWAVE(EQS.9 AND15)
(f)Solutionfor u#ue =4 (ref.1)
Pmndtlnumber~, 0.72
n r fn r’r
rdn r -rIo J
awl s -s10
0.0 0.0000 4.0000 -443623 0.0000 O::;;; 0.0000 O::;:;.1 .3’790 3.6964 -3s84s .0909
1.000o.2582
U1S6.889s
.8 .7198 X3077 +7;:: .1791 .8683 .4847Zloos
.1779 .7811lo8a8 2-8457
LOO;:
::.a6a6 .ao47 .6579 .2509 .67a4
1.a901 aaiae -3D766 .3s9 6 .73ae .769o .3139 .5830 S136
.6 i,5a73 aa3131.7377
-a67i7 .::;:: .6sa9 .8aoa .367%’ .496oiSa44 -W3688
a253
::.570s .8a09 .4134 .4180 .7:3:
asass 1.7768 .s231 .4900:l&:: .7838 .4.517 .349a.a g.;::: 1.6055 .5683 .414s .7a18 .4835 .a893.9 . 1.4664 -La430 .606a
.5S63.3461 .6458 .5o98 .a37a .47s7
a.3a8s 13554 -.9a58i? a,6i95
.6378 .a8s5 .5646 .5313 .1939 .40a6la679 -.771a .6636 .a33i .4a44 .5486
%a a,64a7 11998 -.5957 .6846 .la85.ls70
.4o89 .s6a9L3 a.7600 1~476 -AS47 .7016
:::;.1511 .34o6 .574a
1.4
5ZZ:
aa7a7 1.1079 -.3431 .71s1B306
.iaoi .a804. .5a3a .0798 3a83
l.s as8i9 1.0781 -.2560 .7a58 .094a .aa83 .59033.oa85 ;.oo:g
.06aa-.1890 .734a
.lSas
k:.074a .184a .5959 .0491
3.1933 -s3ao .7407 .0677 .1473zaa6
.6003 .038aL8 3a967 lha80
.097a-J3998
L9 33990.’?458 .0445 .l16a .6o36
1.0195 -D7L4 .7497 .0341.oa94
.0919 .6068.D774
.oaa6 43608
ao 35oO6 1.0135 ..0506 .78a7 .oa60 .0717 .608a .o17aa.i 3J50i8 i.oo9a -.0355
a474.7$50 .0196 .0556 .6097
aa 3.7oa5 1.oo6a -.oa46 m::.0130
.0147 .04a7~367
.6108 .0097a3 3s030 1.oo4a -.0169 .0110 .0326
oa8a.6116
8.4 3s034 1.ooa8 -.0115 .7589.0073
.oo8a .oa47aa16
.61a3 .0054 ~i63
a.s 4.0036 1.0018 -JI077 .7596 .0060 .0186 .61a78.6 4a03a l~ola +:;: .760a
.0040.0044 .0139 .6131
z?.0029
g;;:
4a039 lDooa .7605 .oo3a .0103 .6133 Deal43039 Moos
Do6a
:! 44040-.ooaa :;::: .ooa3 .0076 .6135
1.0003 -.0014 .0016.0015
.0055 .6136 .0011.0050-ao37
3.0 43040 lfiooa -aoo9 .7611 .oola .0040 .61373.1 4.6040
0008 Doa7lAOO1 -.0006 .761a .0008 .ooa9 .6138
Sa 4.7040 1.0001 -.0004 .7613 .0006 .ooaiDO05
.6138 .00049019
53 48040 1.0001 -.000a .7613 .0004 .0015 .6139D014
3A 4s040 1.0000 -.0001 .7614 .0003.0003
.0010 .6139nolo
aooa DO07
3.5 5.0040 10000 -.0001 .7614 .000a .0007 .6139 Dool .000556 8.1o40 1410003.7
-.0001 %;: .00016.8040
.0005 .6139 JJool .00031.0000
X8.0000 .0001
.7614.0003 .6139 J3001 .000a
.00013.9 .7614
.000a .6139 43000 .000a.0000 .000a .6139 J3000 .0001
40 .7614 .0000 .0001 .61394A
4)000 .0001.7615 .0000 .0001 .6139
4a.0000 .0000
.7615 .0000 .0000 .613943
Dooo .0000
4.4
48
TABLEI.-Concluded.LAMINARBOUNDARY
NACATN3712
LAYERBEHINDSHOCKWAVE(EQS.9 AND15)
(g)Solutionfor %/Ue = 6 (ref.1)
Pmndtl-* *8 o.l~n r *1 f“ r +.I Slln s +1
y 0::;: 6.0000 -8~009 ox):;;s.1977
0.9195 CK$o:g (Ml;;: 1.000o i.3a6a
.a-7a7al
lD410.9009 .2603 La99z
4.4383.3 i.4499
-7a6ao .17913.7534 -64078
.2406.2602
.6668 .1738 .7417 i.aa5e.7710 .6671
.4.a4ao
1.7947 =603 -s4454 .33aa .67a7.6a4a Li20a
.9619 .a99i .6183 9963
.s amasa 2.6643 4::;+ .3958 .5616 .9682 .3461
.6 a3307 2.2613 .449a.4a5a .2662
.4871.7
.9118 .3845:3::: xs4ia -2.8161
.3450 ,73a7.49s5 .4004 .8187 .4155
.8 1.6938 -z164a .s29e.2771 .6197
.9 akao9 1.5048.3a39 .7 94
8.4403
-1.6353 .5s86 .a5a6.aao6
.5 83.5ia7
.4600 a74a .4190
343a40k:
1.3631 -~:$;; .6a17 .ao40 .4941 .47553&.1::
.i364 .33Beu35a3
La.5998 .1s94 .4012 “ .4875 ..Y.060 .a71a
laa18 -.64781.3
.6238 .la34 .3ala .496933918
.0818 .alsll~Z66 -.4641
ld.6a47 .0947 .254a .5040
350a4 1.0873 -.3a8a.06Z6
.633o .07ai .1991 .5095.i69a
.0476 A3ao
L6 3.6097 1.0597 -.a304 .6393L6
.0545 .1545 .51373.7146 1s403 -.1597 .6440 .0409
.0360.i2e9 .s168
.ioaa
1.7 3a180.oa70 .0786
La1.oa70 -.1096 .6476 .0305 .090a .si9a .oaoi .0899
39aoaL9
M179 -.0744 .650a .oaa6 .0687 .5a094.0s17 LOi18 -.0500
.0149 .0453.65al .0166 .0517 .saaa .0109 .0340
2.0 4.iaa6 lno77 -.0333 .6536 .olai .0385 .sa3i2.1 4.aa3a
.ooao .oas41.0049 -.oa19 Aim: .0088 .oa8s .sa38
aa 4.3a36.oosa .01s8
1.0031 -.0143 .0063 .oalo .sa432.3 4.4239
,oo4a .0i38l.ooao -.oo9a .6s59 .004s .01s3 .sa46
24 4.6a40.0030 .0101
i.ooza -.0059 .6563 .oo3a .0111 .sa49 .ooal .0073
u 4.6Z41 2.0008 -.0037 .656S .ooa3 .0080 .Sasl4.7a4a 1s00s
.001s .00s3-.ooa3 .6567 .0016 .0057 .sasa
2.7.0010
h8a4a 1.0003.oo3a
-.001s .6s69 .0011 .0040 .sas32.8 4.9a43 1.0002
.0007 .ooa7-.0009 .6S70 .0008 .ooa8 .sas3
2.9 &oa43.0005 .0019
1.0001 -.000s .657o .000s .ooao .sas4 .0003 .0013
3.0 6aa43 1.0001 -.0003 .6571 .0004 .00143.1 6.aa43
.sas4 ~ooa .00093“0000 ~oooa .6571
La &3a43.000a .0010 .sas4 .000a .0006
Loooo -.0001X3
.6571 .000a .0007 .sa54 .0001 .0004s4a43 1.000o -.0001 .6571 .0001 .0004 -sass
3.4 6s243 1.000o.0001 .0003
.0000 .6571 .0001 .0003 sass .0000 .000a
X53.6
.657a .0000 .000a sass .0000 .0001
X7.6s7a .0000 .0001.6s7a
sass .0000 .0001
M.0000 .0001 sass .0000 .0001
.657a .0000 .0001 sass .0000 .00003.9 .6s7a .0000 .0000 .sas5 .0000 .0000
“
.
.4
.
-. - —— - —.—. ._ __ __ —. —— _._. ____ .-_. -_
NACAm 3’712
. TABLEIr. -
,,
.
ImmGEwmmoF EQIJNI!IO19(9’)
uw/+.
o 1 6
,Eq.(9)14. [23)::EQ.(9)’Eq.(23);;Eq-~9)‘Eq.(23)
* ~0.4696:O.&, !0..7W!3:0.7746 ;l!.6m2 L!xm
I I Im-f ; I
\1.2168i1.2379!Q&7979: 0,774s;0-4249 ‘w+l - W%J ,0.38!53
I
. .
———
I
TABLEIII . - CCMPAR1201iOF INTERPOLATIONFORMJLMWITHEXACTINl!=TIOl?S
OF EQUATION8(9)ANo (15)(PRAMDTLlKIMBER~, 0.72)
U’(&
0.25 0.50 0.75 2.0 4.0
(9fy~15) (%j (9pi15) (%j (97h5) (% (9y&l) (%j (9?%) (%j
f“(o)i - (u#le] 0.5727 0.570 0.6574 0.655 0.7312 0.730 1.0191 1.017 1.3541 1.353
g* ‘“M48 ‘“w ‘“SW ‘“w ‘“ffim 0“862 0“6466 ‘“w 0’5013 0“503
J
-r dq 1.3970 1.396 1.2822 1.279 1.1964 1.194 0.8482 0.940 0.7615 0.754
0
J
wE dq 1.1974 1.201 1.0854 1.087 1.C038 1.004 0.7767 0.774 0.6X59 0.610
0
-s1(o) 0.4996 0.502 0.5665 0.569 0.6247 0.627 0.8512 0.856 1.1156 1.122
r(o) 0.8628 0.858 0.8727 0.867 0.8799 0.876 0.8997 0.893 0.9129 0.907
I
.
I?ACATN371.2 51
TABLEIv.-R2r.IPRomLaOFImmRAIaWcuRRlmm ToR8uLmr-Bouml!IRr-LAYElAmLY818
(8) ReclprocslOf ~ (bsse6on~c61 reSUltSOf ref.n)
+1= -. 6 I -.4 -. 2
5.7705.3284.8834.4273.967s.4853.01.12.5072.2441.9701.6821.386.9960.7559
0
bo 2
19.0717.4915.8214.3112.70IL.069.3807.6~6.7885.8694.921.3.8872.7382.0270
4
31.oo28.4325.8323.1820.3417.841.5.11.1.2.2910.869.3637.831.6.I.504.2883.I.51.o
6
42.9639.3435.7432.0628.3924.6320.7916.9114.891.2.841.O.708.4105.8854.2700
8 10
54.88 66.8450.IS 61.0545.62 55.4640.90 49.7036.17 43.8431.43 38.0226.52 32.2821.52 26.0618.91 23.0216Al 1.8.m13.58 16.4410.63 12.867.391 8.8455.397 6.5270 0
0 (.100.200.300.400.500 “.6m.700.750.m.850.8(M.95a.975
1.000L1.8581.8301.7001.5671.4301.2881.I.39.9814.8869.8071.7097.5985.4575.3469
0
3.270 4.5313.036 4.1832.799 3.8512.557 3.5052.310 3.1492.056 2.7841.782 2.4101.516 2.0191.370 1.8141.21.71.5991.054 1.372.87261.123.6418 .8285.3m3 .631.7
0 0
6.9986.4525.9LM5.3424.7764.I.863.6042.9882.7162.3341.9851.6031.161.8764
0
-. 8
2.1752.0271.8791.7261.5701.4081.2403..062.9672.8668.7584.6360.4m5.36080
-. 6
3.6833.4JJ.3.I.352.m52.5702.2781.9761.6201.4851.3221.138.8350.6824.5247
0
-. 4
5.1424.7464.345S.9403.5283.I.072.6752.2261.9921.7481.4911.211.8826.6657
0
-. 2
6kl6.0615.5365.0064.4683.9203.3592.7782.4762.I.631.8341.4781.064.79870
bo I 2 4
36.1633.0629.8426.81.23.6520.4617.2213.9112.2210.488.6856.7834.662s.381o
6
50.1845.8541.5037.1332.7328.2823.7818.1716.8214.41U..919.2826.3544.5830
8 10
64.2078.2158.8471.4353.06 64.6247.4557.7741.&350.88,36.1043.9230.3236.8724.4329.6821.4126.0118.3322.251.5.141.8.3711.7814.278.0449.7335.804 7.0140 01
0 aloo.200.300Au).!WO.600.700.750.800.850.800.850.975
1.000 1
8.W9 22.127.366 20.256.n7 18.366.062 16.475.398 14.564.724 32.624.034 10.663.322 8.6432.852 7.6092.sn 6.5482.170 5.4471.739 4.2781.243 2.965.8279 2.165
0 0
(c)Reciprocalof 18(bsse6onnumerlcslresultsofref.11)
+=1=1=- b6
57.1852.1647.I.O42.0736.9831.8526.6721.3818.681.5.8313.091o.126.8404.-0
8 I 10-. 4
5.7445.2844.8364.3733.8053.4252.8362.43a2.1661.8831.6061.285.83371.6974
0-
-. 2
7.3&36.7846.1845.5744.9634.3383.7013.0432.703I2.3511.9831.5861.I.29.8388
Jo
09.0018.2647.51.86.7706.0105.2414.456S.6503.231.2.8012.3521.8n1.322.9766
0
2
25.1122.8520.7618.5816.3814.15IJ..8O9.5978.4187.2105.9654.6453.1792.2860
4
41.1737.5735.9630.3326.6923.0018.281.5.481.3.561.1.579.5427.386Solo3.5920
0.lal.200.500.400.500.800.700.750.Wo.850.800.850.975
1.000
2.388 4.0922.221 3.7812.054 3.4671.882 3.1491.707 2.8271.527 2.4961.338 2.1561.140 1.8011.035 1.6a.7.82421.424.80451.21.8.6711 .9950.54)23.7284.3734 .5473
0 0 173.2188.2166.7681.3764).2873.4253.8265.5347.2657.5740.6849.5034.0341.4127.2633.I.323.8028.8420.2824.6416.6620.2212.8615.588.66610.496.1777.4680 0
.
.- —-... .—— — —.—
52 l!rAcAmT3’p2.
.
—
ii a ue
*
ii a
f
,y, v
ue
+
--x, u
(a)Withrespecttowall.
Expansionwave
.
y, v
-iue
,,U
shockwave EkpSIISfonWave -
,(h)Withrespecttowave.
Figure1.- Coordinatesystemsusedtostudyboundary_ behindawavetivandngitioa 6tatiouarymid.
--.,- .’
.“
—. -- — .— -.. .— — .—..-— .
, ,
.
t
y, vEdgeof thermalboundarylayer
3959 ‘
. Mge of velocity boundary layer
u*
e
2’
%
Figure2. - Temperatureandvelocitydistributionsbehinda shock wave.
x, u
I1
I