MS Defence Presentation Elham

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    1/51

    Eastern Mediterranean UniversityMechanical Engineering Department

    Jan 19, 2010

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    2/51

    IntroductionIn most natural convection studies, the base fluid in the

    enclosure has a low thermal conductivity, which limits the

    heat transfer enhancement.An innovative technique, which uses a mixture of

    nanoparticles and the base fluid, was first introduced byChoi.

    The resulting mixture of the base fluid and nanoparticleshaving unique physical and chemical properties isreferred to as a nanofluid.

    The presence of the nanoparticles in the nanofluidincreases the thermal conductivity and thereforesubstantially enhances the heat transfer characteristics ofthe nanofluid.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    3/51

    Solids have Thermal Conductivities that are orderof magnitude larger than those of conventional

    heat transfer fluids.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    4/51

    Increased thermal conductivity will result in higher heattransfer than that of the base (pure) fluid withoutdispersed nanoparticles. Measurements of the heattransfer coefficients of fluids have show that the heattrasfer capability of water increased by 15% with adispersion of less than 1 vol% copper oxide nanoparticles

    Natural convection heat transfer is affected by nanofluid

    properties such as viscosity and thermal conductivity.These parameters are affected by both liquid and solidphases in nanofluid, also volume fraction of nanoparticlesaffect these thermophysical properties. Some ideal

    assumptions about properties of nanofluid were made insimulation of natural convection of nanofluid by someresearchers. Because of these assumptions there is aparadox in results of numerical and experimental studies.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    5/51

    Types of Nanofluids

    The base fluids which are used in nanofluids are common

    heat transfer fluids such as water, engine oil, Ethylene

    glycol and ethanol.

    Some nanoparticle materials that have been used in

    nanofluids are oxide ceramics (Al2O3, CuO, Cu2O), nitride

    ceramics (AIN, SiN), carbide ceramics (Sic, TiC), metals(Ag, Au, Cu, Fe), semiconductors (TiO2), single, double or

    multi-walled carbon (SWCNT, DWCNT, NWCNT), and

    composite materials such as nanoparticle core-polymer

    shell composites.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    6/51

    Thermopysical Properties of Nanofluids

    Some important thermophysical properties ofnanofluids are density, viscosity, thermal conductivity

    and thermal diffusivity. These properties cause that a

    nanofluid act very different from its base fluid in

    cooling applications.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    7/51

    Density of nanofluids (nf)

    The effective density of a fluid containing

    suspended particles at a reference temperatureis given by

    sfnf )1(

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    8/51

    Viscosity of nanofluids(eff )

    It is believed that viscosity is as critical as thermalconductivity in engineering systems that employ fluid

    flow. Pumping power is proportional to the pressure

    drop, which in turn is related to fluid viscosity.

    In laminar flow, the pressure drop is directly

    proportional to the viscosity. All reported results show

    that the viscosity of nanofluids is increased

    anomalously and cannot be predicted by classicalmodels .

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    9/51

    In the most experimental studies of nanofluid,Brinkman formula were used. The effective viscosityof a fluid of viscosity f containing a dilute

    suspension of small rigid spherical particles is givenby Brinkman as:

    )1( 5.2

    f

    eff

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    10/51

    ThermalconductivityofnanofluidsIn the most experimental studies of nanofluid, when

    the samples are dilute (< 5%) and the shape ofnanoparticles are spherical , the effective thermal

    conductivity of the solidliquid mixture is calculated

    using Maxwell equitation which depends on thethermal conductivities of both phases and volume

    fraction of solid as:

    keff

    )(2

    )(22

    kkkk

    kkkk

    k

    k

    sffs

    sffs

    f

    eff

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    11/51

    Thermal diffusivity of nanofluidsnf

    very little work has been performed on the effectivethermal diffusivity of nanofluids, which is especially

    important in convective heat transfer applications.

    Generally nf

    can calculated as follow:

    nf=(keff)stagnant/(cp)nf

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    12/51

    Applications of Nanofluids(1) Improved heat transfer and stability: Because

    heat transfer takes place at the surface of the

    particles, it is desirable to use particles with largersurface area.

    (2) Microchannel cooling without clogging: The

    combination of microchannels and nanofluids willprovide both highly conducting fluids and a largeheat transfer area.

    (3) Miniaturized systems: Miniaturized systems will

    reduce the inventory of heat transfer fluid and willresult in cost savings.

    (4) Reduction in pumping power

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    13/51

    Engineering Applications of Nanofluids

    (a) Nanofluids in transportation: Nanofluids would

    allow for smaller, lighter engines, pumps, radiators,and other components.

    (b) In micromechanics and instrumentation:Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) generate alot of heat during operation. Since nanofluids canflow in microchannels without clogging, they wouldbe suitable coolants.

    (c) In heating, ventilating and air-conditioning(HVAC) systems: Nanofluids could improve heattransfer capabilities of current industrial HVAC andrefrigeration systems.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    14/51

    Natural Convection of Nanofluids

    There are two general categories for study the

    natural convection of fluid: Experimental studies,Numerical studies.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    15/51

    ExperimentalStudiesIn natural convection processes, the thermal and the

    hydrodynamic are coupled and both are stronglyinfluenced by the fluid thermophysical characteristics, thetemperature differences and the system geometry.

    Differentially heated enclosures are extensively used tosimulate natural convection heat transfer within systems

    using nanofluids. Experimental results have beenreported in the literature that dispersion of nanoparticlesin the base fluid may result in considerable decrease inheat transfer. Putra et al and Wen and Ding found a

    systematic and definite decline in the heat transfer for aparticular range of Rayleigh numbers and density andconcentration of nanoparticles. Similar results were alsoobtained by Santra et al. who modeled the nanofluid as a

    non-Newtonian fluid.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    16/51

    In figure the experimentalresults of Wen and

    Ding can be seen. The

    Nusselt number decreases

    with the Rayleigh number

    during the transient heating

    period. Similar phenomena

    were also observed by Tsoet al. and Bhowmik and

    Tou for cooling of electronic

    chips through natural

    convection in a verticalrectangular channel.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    17/51

    NumericalStudiesResearch studies consider a two-dimensional

    enclosure of height H and width L filled with a

    nanofluid as shown in Figure.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    18/51

    According to Khanafer et al.numerical results theaverage Nusselt number along the hot vertical wall is

    correlated in terms of the Grashof number and the

    particles volume fraction.The correlation of Khanaferet al. can be expressed as :

    For 103Gr 105 and 0 0.25

    GrNu 3123.00809.1 )4436.0(5163.0

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    19/51

    Santra et al. (2007) presented the numerical resultsof the simulation of natural convection in a

    differentially heated square cavity using copper

    water nanofluid for 10

    4

    Ra 10

    7

    and 0.05 5according to figure as:

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    20/51

    Ho et al. (2008) also did a simulation of naturalconvection in the enclosure filled with alumina

    water Nanofluid and found another correlation as:

    For 104Ra 106 and 0 0.04

    And they found parameters C, m and n in different

    four models of simulation according to Table as:

    RaCNu nm)1(

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    21/51

    Values of coefficient C and exponents m,n for different models according to

    numerical results of Ho et al.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    22/51

    DESIGNINGTHEEXPERIMENTThe experiments have been done in an enclosure

    having the dimensions of 11 cm (length) and 11 cm(height) and 8 cm (width) which has the aspect ratio

    (H/L) of 1. The cavity was full of nanofluid.

    The front, back, bottom and top sides of the

    enclosure are made of Plexiglas which has 1 cm

    thickness. Left and right sides of the enclosureconsist of brass plates (Heat Exchanger) in which

    water passages are engraved.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    23/51

    A top view of cavity: [A] Plexiglas Plates, [B] Heat exchangers(right

    side is hot wall and left side is cold wall), [C] Insulation Material, [E]

    Output Pipes,[D]Input Pipes, [T10 to T13] Pipe Thermocouples

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    24/51

    A photo of cavity

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    25/51

    Brass plates of heat exchangers

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    26/51

    Picture(a)and(b)showtubesandpicture(c)showscavityafterinsulation.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    27/51

    Schematic diagram of the experimentalapparatus

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    28/51

    Nanofluid Used in Experiment

    The candidate for this project is a dispersion of Cu2O

    nanospheres in ethanol as base fluid.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    29/51

    Making Nanofluid Ready to Use

    Pure ethanol is added to 10, 15 and 25 ml of main

    nanofluid till the total volume of solution reached 968

    ml (volume of cavity: 11118) after that we have 3

    different solution of main nanofluid S1, S2and S3.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    30/51

    Experimental Measurement Method

    The unsteady experiments were performed for 3

    different samples of nanofluid and for each of them

    in 5 different (T) bath = 10C, 15 C, 20 C, 25 C

    and 30 C.

    Temperature data were collected ten seconds by ten

    seconds by data acquisition system in one Microsoft

    Excel file during each test.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    31/51

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

    First of all we need some thermo physical properties

    of both solid and fluid at the base temperature.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    32/51

    Step 1: Calculate Nu number

    = (Cp)w[T(13)- T(10)]

    TH= Temperature on the hot wall: T (6)TC=Temperature on the cold wall: T (5)

    L = Length of cavity

    H =Height of cavity W =Width of cavity

    =Mass flow rate of hot water

    )()( kTT

    HW

    LQNu

    effstagnant

    CH

    m

    m

    Q

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    33/51

    Step 2:

    A) calculate volume fraction of samples (%)

    OCu

    sample

    lesnanopartic

    mv

    2

    v

    v

    cavity

    lesnanopartic

    sample (%)

    OCu

    sample

    lesnanopartic

    mv

    2

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    34/51

    B) Calculate the effective stagnant thermal conductivity ofSamples: As our samples are dilute ( < 5%) and theshape of nanoparticles are spherical , the effectivestagnant thermal conductivity of the solidliquid mixture

    is calculated using Maxwell equitation which depends onthe thermal conductivities of both phases and volumefraction of solid as:

    )(2

    )(22)(

    kkkk

    kkkk

    k

    k

    sffs

    sffs

    f

    eff stagnant

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    35/51

    Step 3:

    According to Raleigh number formula:

    We have to calculate some parameters such as nf,

    nfand nf.

    nfnf

    CHnfnf HTTgRa

    3

    )(

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    36/51

    Transienttemperatureandheattransfercoefficient

    At t=0 the temperature at the right side of the cavity

    is suddenly raised by applying a temperature

    difference (T) bath.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    37/51

    TransientNusseltnumberasafunctionoftimeforthethreesamplesat( T)bath=10 C.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    38/51

    TransientRaleighnumberasafunctionoftimeforthethreesamplesat( T) bath=10 C.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    39/51

    TransientNusselt number

    versus

    Rayleigh

    number

    for

    thesampleS3at( T)bath=10 C.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    40/51

    Using results from

    Figures, we are able tofind constants c and n in

    correlation Nu= c Rafor

    3 samples atT = 10C

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    41/51

    ConstantscandnincorrelationNu=cRa

    ncsample

    -1.548E+15S1

    -1.978E+19S2

    -1.848E+18S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    42/51

    Temperature Distribution in Cavity atVarious Times

    Numerical studies were performed by krane and Jesse (1983),

    Khanafer et al. (2003) and Abu-Nada and Oztop (2009) to analyzeTemperature distribution of nanofluid in cavity for various mesh sizes:

    31x31, 41x41, 61x61 and 81x81.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    43/51

    Temperature distribution in cavity at t =3000 s for

    the three Samples at (T) bath= 10C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    X

    S1

    S2

    S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    44/51

    Temperature distribution in cavity at t = 3000 s for thethree Samples at (T) bath= 15C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    X

    S1

    S2

    S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    45/51

    Temperature distribution in cavity at t = 3000 s for

    the three Samples at(T) bath= 20C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    X

    S1

    S2

    S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    46/51

    Temperature distribution in cavity at t = 3000s for thethree Samples at (T) bath= 25C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    X

    S1

    S2S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    47/51

    Temperature distribution in cavity at t = 3000 s for thethree Samples at (T) bath= 30C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    X

    S1

    S2

    S3

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    48/51

    CONCLUSION In the case of temperature distribution of nanofluid in

    cavity, both numerical and experimental analyzing areagreeing each other.

    The present results and also other experimental resultsare opposing numerical results in the case of thetransient Ra and Nu numbers. Present experimentalresults show that using nanofluid in cavity cause

    decreasing heat transfer coefficients because Nu numberdecreased during the time.

    Nu = hL/k

    According to the all expermental results and also presentresults the parameter n in the correlation Nu= c Raisnegative.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    49/51

    The numerical results are not accurate to find acorrelation like Nu= c Rabecause the simulations

    were based on some ideal assumptions of (a)

    nanofluid was Newtonian, incompressible and theflow was in the laminar regime; (b) nanoparticles

    were uniform in shape and size; (c) there was no slip

    between liquid and particle phases in terms of bothvelocity and temperature; and (d) nanofluids had

    constant thermophysical properties except for

    density variation that gave rise to the buoyancy.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    50/51

    The assumption of (c) and (d) are very difficult to be

    satisfied for real nanofluids. Although nanofluids

    behave more like pure fluids than suspensions of

    large particles and also some thermophysicalproperties like viscosity , thermal conductivity and

    density of nanofluid cannot be constant in various

    times.

  • 8/12/2019 MS Defence Presentation Elham

    51/51