Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Global Energy Outlook & Intersection with the Forest Products Industry
Rick Zalesky
Vice President, Biofuels and Hydrogen Business
May 10, 2007
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Biofuels and the Energy Industry
Global Perspectives
Biofuel Drivers
Biofuel Success Factors
Chevron’s Actions
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Global Energy Perspectives
Grow energy demand globally, especially in China, India and Latin AmericaIncrease competition and investments for resourcesDevelop cleaner fuels and technologies
Improve energy efficiencyDiversifying supply & integrating sustainable resourcesIncreasing expectationssurrounding climate change
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Millionbarrelsper day
Extra-Heavy Oil and Bitumen
Gas to LiquidsCoal to Liquids
Bio-Fuels
Source Data: Chevron & Consultant Consensus
Shale Oil
Diversification of Feedstock and FuelHow big will it be? What will it be and by when?
0 -
20
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Hydrogen
International Regulation Pushes Biofuels Penetration Further
Regulation also in place/under discussion in many other countries
Japan• Target of 10%
renewable fuels by 2008
Australia• Subsidies for
local ethanol producers of $0.92/gal
Source: IEA; DOE; USDA; National Biodiesel Board; CHR; McKinsey; Deutsche Bank
Europe• 5.75% biofuel content mandate for 2010• Germany $3.10/gal ethanol blend tax
exemption; $2.30/gal biodiesel tax exemption• Spain $1.90/gal ethanol exemption• France $1.60/gal ethanol tax subsidy• Tax subsidies in Italy, UK
Thailand• Requires E10 to
be sold at all Bangkok gas stations
United States• MTBE ban – replacement with ethanol• 7.5 billion renewable fuel mandated by 2012• $0.51/gallon subsidies for ethanol; $1.00/gal blend subsidy
for biodiesel• AB 32: Establishes the goal of reducing the state's
greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent below levels projected for 2020
• Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS): Requires a 10 percent reduction in the carbon content of all passenger vehicle fuels sold in California by 2020; Expected to replace 20 percent of California’s on-road gasoline consumption with lower-carbon fuels and place more than 7 million alternative fuel or hybrid vehicles on California's roads
South America• Brazil requires 20%
ethanol blends• Colombia requires 10%
ethanol in large cities• Argentina requires move
to 5% ethanol by 2011
Canada• 2 provinces require 7.5 to 10%
ethanol
China• E10 blends in six
provinces required• Possible 10%
ethanol mandate after 2010
Korea• Mandate of 20%
renewable fuels by 2008 under consideration
New Zealand• Biofuels sales
obligation commences in 2008
• Sales obligation at 3.4% by 2012
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Customer Acceptance
Energy companies will provide whatever fuels customers demand
For a customer to demand an alternative fuel, they want to see three criteria fulfilled:1. Equal or improved driving performance, safety,
reliability and comfort2. Equal or lower vehicle and fuel costs 3. Improved fuel economy and environmental benefits
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Btu Spent for One Btu of Diesel Available at Fuel Pump
Total Fossil Energy Added
Fossil Energy Added
(NG + Coal + Petroleum)
Petroleum EnergyAdded
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Btu Spent for One Btu of Gasoline Available at Fuel Pump
Total Fossil Energy Added
Fossil Energy Added
(NG + Coal + Petroleum)
Petroleum EnergyAdded
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Gaso
lin
e
Die
sel S
oy F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l
Die
sel
So
y F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l
Gaso
lin
e
Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
ol
Gaso
lin
e
Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
olD
iese
l
Source Data: Consultant Consensus
Biofuels Energy Balance
So
y F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
ol
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Btu Spent for One Btu of Diesel Available at Fuel Pump
Total Energy(Fossil +
Renewable, includes Energy in Feedstock)
Fossil Energy Added
(NG + Coal + Petroleum)
Petroleum EnergyAdded
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Btu Spent for One Btu of Gasoline Available at Fuel Pump
Total Energy(Fossil +
Renewable, includes Energy in Feedstock)
Fossil Energy Added
(NG + Coal + Petroleum)
Petroleum EnergyAdded
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Renewable BTU
Fossil BTU
So
y F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l
Gaso
lin
e
Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
ol
Die
sel S
oy F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l
Die
sel
So
y F
AM
E B
iod
iese
l
Bio
mass
FT D
iese
l
Gaso
lin
e
Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
ol
Gaso
lin
e
Co
rn E
than
ol
Cell
ulo
sic
Eth
an
ol
Renewable BTU
Fossil BTU
Die
sel
Source Data: Consultant Consensus
Biofuels Energy Balance
CO2 Benefits from Biofuels
Wells to Wheels Greenhouse Gas Emissions
0 -
5 -
10 -
15 -
20 -
25 -
30 -
Gasoline Corn Ethanol
Cellulosic Ethanol
Diesel Soy FAME Biodiesel
Biomass FT Biodiesel
Per GallonGasoline Equivalent
Per GallonDiesel Equivalent
LB CO2 Equivalent Per Gallon
Source Data: Consultant Consensus
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Biofuels Success Factors
2nd generation production technology
Industrial-scale infrastructure
Large, concentrated supplies of feedstock
..plus, sustainable business models
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Chevron’s Biofuel Objectives
Build a focused biofuels organization that coordinates enterprise efforts while actively shaping and managing the emerging biofuels market segmentImprove the performance of first-generation product quality assuranceDevelop next-generation processing technology to open up the choice of feedstocks, including cellulosic materials Improve small-scale distributed manufacturing
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Biofuels – E85 project
Demonstration program to learn more about E85 and how it works in practical applications
Collaborative project with the state of California, General Motors and Pacific Ethanol Inc.
Evaluate E85 performance, efficiency and environmental issues from October 2006 thru December 2007, using California-formulated fuelTwo locations – Oakland and Marysville, California
Provide dispensing and storage capabilities
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Biodiesel – U.S.
Chevron invested in Galveston Bay Biodiesel
Texas-based biodiesel production facility
Potential production of 110 million gallons
One of 1st large-scale biodiesel facilities in North America
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Biodiesel is Dependant on Incentives Due to High Feedstock Costs
Current Economics:
Biodiesel’s low projected penetration is driven by poor economics
Current technologies are not economically viable without generous subsidies
Feedstock costs, which account for ~80% of production costs, are the limiting factor
Biodiesel Incentive Programs:
Biodiesel demand has grown due to mandates and environmental benefits
Significant incentives are currently in place for biodiesel globally
However, many programs are ending or up for renewal
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
3.0
2.21.7
1.31.0
0.70.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Gen 2 Technology:Political issues will limit subsidized production on land that is (or could be) used to produce food
Feedstocks such as jatropha and algae could be desirable if proven sustainable and economic:
− Jatropha, and other species that can thrive on marginal lands, could provide a large supply without displacing food crops
− Algae, which require no arable land at all, potentially can produce much more oil per acre than any terrestrial crop
− These crops are still some years from being commercially viable feedstock sources
Feedstock availability w/ current land
Global Biodiesel Market Penetration*
Percent of 2006 Diesel Volumes
* Source: Mckinsey Analysis
Traditional Biodiesel Feedstock Availability & Gen 2 Technology
Traditional Feedstock Availability:World feedstock availability for traditional crops is a limiting factor without additional land
Food-for-fuel competition could put significant pressure on prices if world market penetration grows above current levels
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
Georgia Tech - Advanced distributed manufacturing technologiesChemical characterization of feedstocks; impact of pretreatment technologies on chemical structure and reactivity of biomass resourcesAnalysis of chemical constituents impacting fermentation of enzyme hydrolyzed biomass to bio-ethanolIntegration of chemical analysis into a systems model for biomass to bio-ethanol production.
UC Davis – Agricultural sciences, biotech, transportation policyCalifornia-based; biomass identification and development of technologies togrow, harvest and process into transportation fuelsPotentially includes a demonstration facility
NREL – Only U.S. National Lab devoted to renewable energyIdentification, evaluation and development of second-generation biofuels production from biologic pathways (e.g., algae)Identification, analysis and characterization of biomass and feedstock
Colorado Center for Biorefining and BiofuelsThe research focus of the center is on the identification and characterization of biomass energy crops and the development of advanced biofuel production technologies.Participating research institutions in C2B2 include the University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado State University and NREL.
Lincoln University – New Zealand’s Leading Agricultural UniversityResearch into developing viable biodiesel crops of commercial value to NZ farmers.
Several other strategic relationships being developedFocused on feedstock, conversion technology and logistics.
Current Research Alliances
© Chevron 2007
Role of Feedstock and Technology
Key Messages - Cost
Gen 1 (corn and sugar cane) technologies will be the primary source of ethanol for at least the next decade
Corn and cane ethanol producers are likely to be locationally advantaged in a cellulosic world as well, since cheap cellulosic biomass will also be concentrated in the same regions (e.g., Brazil, USMW)
As cellulosic technologies gain scale over the 5-15 year horizon production costs are expected to fall, however Gen 1 capacity in cost-advantaged regions (e.g., USMW and Brazil) should remain viable
Key Messages - AvailabilityWith expected improvements in yield and expansions in acreage planted, corn and cane ethanol producers can address the likely needs through 2015 globally
If cellulosic technology does not gain scale, there would be sufficient feedstock from starch technologies to drive a E10-20 global volume penetrationImprovement in cellulosic technologies to the extent of 35% cost reduction or more could help increase the availability of economic biomass by a factor of 2Brazil is expected to be the largest source of biomass in both the Gen 1 and Gen 2 worlds
© 2007 Chevron Corporation
A Chevron-Weyerhaeuser Collaboration will Create Value for both Parties
Crop/Seeds Feedstock Supply Pretreatment Conversion Trading/Distribution /Marketing
A collaboration between Chevron and Weyerhaeuser maximizes cellulosic ethanol opportunities by integrating the value chain and enhancing conversion and commercial capabilities through
synergistic skill sets and core competencies
Process engineering, including pretreatment and thermo-chemical conversion technology
Operational excellence: safety and reliability
Process control expertise
Flammable liquid handling
Blending
Co-generation
Distribution logistics
Fuel hedging
Market understanding and customer access
Product engineering
Energy industry perspective
Process design
Conversion technology
Value engineering
Distillation design
Various pre-treatment technologies
IP position on these technologies
Aqueous processes: washing, environmental treatment
Recovered fiber supply contracts
Procurement logistics
Quality evaluation
Processing slurries/ wet solids
Transaction structuring
Logistics
Trading
Culture of upstream partnership
Yield improvement through pollination
Intercropping
Third party learnings from partnerships and alliances, e.g. UC Davis, Georgia Tech, NREL, etc.
Chevron and Weyerhaeuser Synergies in the Value Chain (cellulose to ethanol)
Key:
Chevron Synergy
WY Synergy
© 2007 Chevron Corporation