A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE EVIEW OF BIOFUEL …liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:306437/FULLTEXT02.pdf · A Systematic Literature Review of Biofuel Synergies ... Often biofuels are

A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF BIOFUEL SYNERGIES

ISRN: LIU-IEI-R--10/0092--SE

Version 2.0, Revised since 2009

Written by: Michael Martin and Jorge E. Fonseca A.

Linköping University

Environmental Technology and Management, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

1

A Systematic Literature Review of Biofuel Synergies

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 2 AIM ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3 IDENTIFICATION OF RELEVANT ARTICLES ........................................................................... 3

3.1 Searching for Keywords and Combinations of Keywords ............................................... 3 3.1.1 Step 1 – Gauging the number of relevant articles ............................................... 3 3.1.2 Step 2- Selecting Articles for further Analysis ..................................................... 5 3.1.3 Step 3 – Categorization of articles ....................................................................... 6 3.1.4 Step 4 – Obtaining selected articles/synergies .................................................... 7

4 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 7 5 UNIQUE SYNERGIES FROM LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................. 14

5.1 Ethanol Synergies ........................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Biogas Synergies ............................................................................................................ 15 5.3 Biodiesel Synergies from Literature Review ................................................................. 16 5.4 General Synergies in the Biofuel Industry ..................................................................... 16

6 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION ............................................................................................ 16 7 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 17

TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Report Methodology and Steps for finding Articles ................................................... 3

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Combination Word Search Results .............................................................................. 5 Table 2: Articles saved in each folder in Refworks ................................................................... 6 Table 3: Recurring themes of exchanges ................................................................................... 7 Table 4: Biofuel to Biofuel Industry Synergies ......................................................................... 8 Table 5: Biofuel to External Industry Synergies ...................................................................... 10 Table 6: External to Biofuel Industry Synergies ...................................................................... 13

2

1 INTRODUCTION

Often biofuels are criticized in the media for their low production energy efficiency, environmental impacts and by using food for fuel production. An answer most critics rely on is stating how 2nd generation biofuels will solve all the problems the first generation biofuels possess(Moore 2008a). However, 1st generation biofuels must “pave the way” for 2nd generation biofuels. They can do this by providing the infrastructure, technology and knowledge provided by the fuels. In order to increase the efficiency of 1st generation biofuels, the theories of industrial symbiosis can be applied. Industrial symbiosis theories are designed to integrate production systems and other industries to improve energy efficiency and environmental performance(Miao and Wu 2006,Moore 2008b). By integrating biofuel production systems, the by-products of biofuels can be used in subsequent processes. By making use of by-products, excess heat, etc. the energy efficiency can be improved and allow for more benefits including economic and environmental performance(Mueller 2007b). Industrial symbiosis literature includes many examples of how industries can benefit from one another but does not include much literature on the integration of biofuels. Synergies do however exist as there are many by-products which are highly prized in other industries, e.g. glycerol and DDGS. The biofuels themselves can even be used in subsequent processes.

2 AIM

The aim of producing this literature study is to find relevant biofuel synergies1 within various fields from scientific literature. By searching for keywords and combining these with keywords related to biofuel synergies we can review the extent and knowledge of synergies between external industries with biofuels, between biofuel industries and the use of their by-products throughout various research fields. The main research questions to be answered are:

What do other research fields use biofuel by-products for? What are the current trends for the use of biofuels and their by-products? What substrates/by-products/wastes from other industries can be used for biofuel

production? Which synergies exist in the literature beyond those presented in other phases of the

research project? What are some potential uses for biofuels, their by-products and industrial wastes and

utilities to integrate in symbiosis?

1 Synergy is defined in this report as the relationship and cooperation between industrial activities by the shared consumption, disposal and reuse of products and utilities.

3

3 IDENTIFICATION OF RELEVANT ARTICLES

This report is based on an extensive systematic literature review of relevant literature for biofuel synergies, i.e. the handling of by-products between biofuel industries and external industries. The systematic literature review process was used due to its applicability in this context to allow for possible exclusion and inclusion of relevant articles based upon a clinical question, in this case finding biofuel synergies(Green et al 2006). The literature review was carried out in a step-by-step manner in order to exclude non-relevant literature from the abundance literature on the subjects.

3.1 Searching for Keywords and Combinations of Keywords

Figure 1: Report Methodology and Steps for finding Articles

3.1.1 Step 1 – Gauging the number of relevant articles

The first step of the literature review was to review how many articles were available for the topics of biogas, bioethanol, biodiesel and thereafter biofuel and to provide a “pool” of articles for later analysis. The literature review was carried out using the Science Direct scientific database search engine (reference to science direct). No other search engines were used to find articles due to the time limits of the research project and extent of literature available from the Science Direct database. The searching criteria was limited to the following constraints:

Step 4: Final Review

Step 3: Categorized Themes

Step 2: Exclusion of 2nd Generation Biofuels

Step 1-B: Keyword + Combination words

Step 1-A: Keyword

4

Dates: From: 2000 To: present 2012 Include: Journals and all books Source: All sources Subject: All sciences Term within: Abstract, title and keywords

A search was conduced for articles concerning biogas, ethanol(bioethanol), biodiesel and biofuel articles. This led to a total of 1150, 20050(471), 1553 and 1699 number of articles for each topic respectively. A total of 24,452 articles were therefore available in the field. Based on the methodology of a systematic literature review, exclusion categories were thereafter applied, which are described in the following sections. It was apparent that combination words were necessary to narrow the focus of the literature. Combination words were then used, to find relevant articles under each topic for biofuel synergies, i.e. relevant articles for all topics; biogas, bioethanol, biodiesel and biofuel. Combination words to include with each topic keyword included:

Allocate; Allocation; by-product; byproduct; cooperation; co-product; coproduct; exchange; incorporate; incorporation; integrate;

integration; symbiosis; synergy; synergies; share; sharing; substitute; substitution; substrate; residue; and utility.

These combination words were chosen as they represent interaction between biofuels and external industries and could provide necessary literature for this study. Table 1 below shows a review of the number of articles found for each combination of search words.

5

Table 1: Combination Word Search Results

Compiled (2000-Present) Main Keywords

Combination Words Biofuel Biodiesel Ethanol (26,412) Biogas

3,211 3,148 Bioethanol (1,007) 1,864

symbiosis 2 1 6 7synergy 15 8 35 5

cooperation 14 7 21 5by-product 651 684 3368 245byproduct 127 112 415 78co-product 156 119 684 57exchange 63 94 599 17

Share 80 27 96 27sharing 0 0 31 2

substitute 100 132 158 44substitution 66 42 311 35allocation 48 15 39 10integrate 17 5 31 6

integration 111 45 187 33incorporate 14 4 41 5

incorporation 25 24 302 6substrate 202 158 1782 305residue 258 120 647 158utility 24 11 135 80

Total Number: 1973 1608 8888 1125 Upon finding the number of articles for each topic and combination word, further exclusion criteria were applied to produce relevant literature and narrow the number of articles for this study. As can be seen in Table 1, there are many articles provided for each topic; especially for ethanol. However, for some keyword+combination word searches, only a limited number of articles were returned. To finalize Step 1, some of the combination + keyword searches were disregarded from the previous listing of combination words. Those include the combination words, synergies, coproduct and allocate; which are not present in Table 1.

3.1.2 Step 2- Selecting Articles for further Analysis

Step 2 of the literature search was conducted in order to limit the number of articles and provide relevant articles for further in depth analysis in Steps 3 and 4. Following a review of the articles in each of these combination topic + keyword searches, many themes emerged for each respective biofuel topic. Many articles contained information about chemical experiments, second generation biofuels and hydrogen production which are beyond the scope of this study. The following exclusion criteria were thus applied in order to confine the literature to first generation biofuel production and interaction between biofuels and external industries for each respective biofuel topic.

6

Biodiesel Exclude 2nd Generation Biofuels i.e. Fischer-Tropsch and other synthetic diesel

Biogas

Exclude 2nd Generation Biofuels i.e. steam reforming and gasification of biomass Ethanol

Exclude 2nd Generation Biofuels i.e. cellulosic ethanol Exclude articles about ethanol used for hydrogen fuel cells

Biofuel

Exclude 2nd Generation Biofuels i.e. all second generation biofuel articles

In some of the cases as shown above, there were over 1,000 articles for each topic and combined keyword respectively. After excluding the topics as aforementioned, the first 150 articles from the total listing in those cases where there were over 150 were reviewed and saved if relevant. Articles that were considered relevant after the exclusion categories were saved in a referencing database, Refworks. Refworks was used due the ease of exporting citations and providing links back to the articles for subsequent steps. All articles were saved in a respective folder under that theme, i.e. there were 4 folders created which were labeled biofuel, biogas, ethanol and biodiesel. The number of articles contained in each folder are shown below in Table 2.

Table 2: Articles saved in each folder in Refworks Biodiesel Biogas Bioethanol Biofuel

Number of Articles

91 196 66 138

3.1.3 Step 3 – Categorization of articles

The next step for limiting the number of articles and finding relevant articles was to categorize the articles in order to find if there were recurring themes. An in depth review of all abstracts was conduced from the articles reviewed in Step 2. These abstracts and articles were categorized based on their themes. During the process it was found that some of the articles were redundant or doubled in several folders and were therefore deleted before proceeding to the categorizing them. The categories for each folder can be seen in Table 3.

7

Table 3: Recurring themes of exchanges Categories Food/Feed

Biogas Energy/Fuel Municipal Biodiesel

Algae Chemical/Cosmetics

Agriculture Ethanol

Greenhouse Environmental Services

Materials/Building Biofuel General Forestry/Paper

The list of all references and articles contained in Table 3 are listed in Appendix A-D

3.1.4 Step 4 – Obtaining selected articles/synergies

A final listing of relevant articles was produced for Step 4 of the literature review. Once the articles were divided into categories the abstracts were reviewed for further relevance. Articles which contained information about integration of biofuel processes, making use of by-products and using residues and by-products of other industries for biofuel production were included in the final list. Many articles were found to contain similar contents, i.e. from the categorized themes from Step 3. For example, many articles describe the use of biomass for biofuel production. Consequently, only a selected few in the case where many similar articles are present were selected for the final list. Thereafter, articles found under the biofuel heading have been split into their relevant categories. They contain synergies for the bioethanol, biogas and biodiesel categories and have therefore been added to each respective folder and list. The results of the final listing can be seen in Table 4 in the subsequent text.

4 RESULTS

Shown below in Tables 4-6are the final listings for the synergy articles obtained from the said literature review. Table 4 consists of all synergies regarding biofuel synergies between biofuel industries, while Table 5 contains synergies originating with products/utilities from biofuel industry shared with external industries and finally Table 6 provides synergies originating from External Industries used for biofuel production.

8

Table 4: Biofuel to Biofuel Industry Synergies Biofuel Biofuel Synergy

From Literature Review (Martin and Fonseca 2012)

By‐Product/ Utility

Interaction

Corn Oil for biodiesel production (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Biodiesel

Ethanol DDGS and syrup for biogas production (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Biogas

Ethanol stillage as biogas source (Doušková et al 2010,Wilkie et al 2000)


Ethanol production heat used for biogas process (Odhiambo et al 2009,Pfeffer et al 2007)


Oil cake as biogas source (Ramachandran et al 2007)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Biogas

Glycerol to biogas production (Siles López et al 2009,Yazdani and Gonzalez 2007a)


Glycerol used to produce ethanol (Liu et al 2012)


Anaerobic digestion of microalgae residues from biodiesel production (Ehimen et al 2011)


Ethanol production from biodiesel by‐products (Visser et al 2011)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Ethanol

Biogas production of ethanol by‐products (De Paoli et al 2011)


Integrated ethanol, cattle production and biogas to close material loops (DeVuyst et al 2011)


Industrial CO2 used for methanol production (Pontzen et al 2011)

by‐Product Biofuel General‐Biofuel General

Ethanol used as alcohol for biodiesel production (Quintella et al 2012)


Integrating biofuel production to produce ethanol, biogas and biodiesel (Martin and Eklund 2011)

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Biofuel General

CO2 from ethanol production used for algae for biodiesel production (Powell and Hill 2010)


Ethanol Stillage used for Biogas Production and CO2 used for algae (Doušková et al 2010)


From Brainstorming Workshop (Martin et al 2009)


Interaction

Exhaust emissions from Biogas Producer sent to Ethanol Producer for combustion/Odor Control

Utility Biogas‐Ethanol

Sulfur is a bad input for biogas production. Need a better way to control pH at Ethanol Producer. Biogas Producer prefers Nitrogen instead of Sulphur


9

Biogas used for electricity production for biodiesel production

By‐Product Biogas‐Biodiesel

Refine the digestate to extract fatty acids and phosphor


Gas produced at Ethanol Producer ‐ Sent to Biogas Producer for upgrading

Utility Ethanol‐Biogas

Gas produced at Ethanol Producer ‐ Used for odor control/combustion process

Utility Ethanol‐Ethanol

Exhaust emissions from Ethanol Producer used to dry biogas digestate


Fusil/Other Alcohols from Ethanol Still used for biodiesel production


Ethanol used for Biodiesel Production By‐Product Ethanol‐Biodiesel

Oil from Wheat/Corn/Other starch crops for ethanol, pressed, oil expelled and used for biodiesel before crops sent for fermentation to ethanol


Pelletizer at Ethanol Producer employed with Digestate from Biogas Producer to make biomass pellets for fuel or feed


Biomass from ethanol production (other than stillage) used for biogas production


Use stillage for biogas production only By‐Product Ethanol‐Biogas

Glycerol produced from biodiesel production for biogas production


Glycerol (Biodiesel by‐product) + Fatty Acids (Biogas by‐product) used for creation of monoglycerides for production of Biodiesel Feedstock


Seed cake and shells from biodiesel processing could contain starch and thus make ethanol

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Ethanol

C02 from biofuel production used for algae for Biofuel Production

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Biofuel General

Waste heat from ethanol and biogas facilities used in biodiesel production

Utility Ethanol‐Biodiesel

Pinch Analysis for possible excess heat & cooling between biofuel industries (Biorefinery/Cooperation)

Utility Biofuel General‐Biofuel General

Waste heat from ethanol production used for pre‐heating of materials

Utility Ethanol‐Ethanol

10

Table 5: Biofuel to External Industry Synergies

Biofuel External Synergies



Interaction

Ethanol DDGS for human food applications (Champagne 2007,Robinson et al 2008)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Food/Feed

DDGS for animal feed (Robinson et al 2008,Klopfenstein et al 2007)


Integration with Extrusion technology for food/fodder production (Klopfenstein et al 2007)

Utility Ethanol‐Food/Feed

DDGS used as filler for bioplastics (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009,Klopfenstein et al 2007)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Materials/Building

Ethanol By‐Products for Fertilizer Production (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Agriculture

Ethanol By‐Products for Construction materials (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009)


Biogas digestate used as solid fuel (Kratzeisen et al 2010)

By‐Product Biogas‐Energy/Fuel

Digestate used as particle board fibers (Zheng et al 2009,Zheng et al 2009)

By‐Product Biogas‐Materials/Building

Digestate used as fertilizer (Sager 2007) By‐Product Biogas‐Agriculture

Biogas digestate used as feed (Sehgal and Sehgal 2002)

By‐Product Biogas‐Food/Feed

Biodiesel by‐products used as carbon filters(Nunes et al 2009,Foo and Hameed 2009)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Env. Services

Biodiesel used as remediation agent for treatment of oil spills (Fernández‐Álvarez et al 2007)


Glycerol used as animal feed (Donkin et al 2009a)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Food/Feed

Glycerol used to produce hydrogen (Slinn et al 2008,Sánchez et al)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Energy/Fuel

Glycerol used as gasoline additive (Kiatkittipong et al 2010)


Glycerine used as a fuel (McNeil et al) By‐Product Biodiesel‐Energy/Fuel

Glycerol used for combustion (Bohon et al 2011)


Biofuel by‐products (DDGS; rapeseed cake and digestate) for combustion (Piotrowska et al 2011)

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Energy/Fuel

Conversion of glycerol to glycolipids (Liu et al 2011)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Chemical/Cosmetics

Chitin‐glucan complex production from biodiesel by‐products (Chagas et al 2010)


Biofuel production residues used as soil amendments (Gell et al 2011)

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Env. Services

Glycerol used as dust suppressant (Medeiros et al 2012)


11

Glycerol used as carbon source to produce biosurfactant (de Sousa et al 2011)


Glycerol and spent earth from biodiesel production used to produce clay bricks (Eliche‐Quesada et al)

By‐Product Biodiesel‐Materials/Building

Biogas digestate used as solid fuel (Kratzeisen et al 2010)

By‐Product Biogas‐Energy/Fuel

Sugarcane ethanol by‐products used as cattle feed (Egeskog et al 2011)


Distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) used in cornbread production (Liu et al 2011)


Ethanol used as dyeing agent for textiles (Ferrero et al 2011)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Chemical/Cosmetics

Sweet corn tassels from ethanol production used as replacement to peat moss in greenhouses (Vaughn et al 2011)

By‐Product Ethanol‐Agriculture

Wheat protein, in aqueous ethanol, used for production of particle‐bonding composites (Sanghoon 2011)


By‐products from ethanol and biodiesel production used for biocomposites (Diebel et al 2012)

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Materials/Building

Combustion of DDGS as a fuel source (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009,Doušková et al 2010)

By‐Product

Carbon dioxide from biogas upgrading for greenhouses/plant source (Jaffrin et al 2003)

By‐Product Biogas‐Greenhouse

Biogas digestate used for vermitechnology (Surindra 2010)

By‐Product Biogas‐Agriculture



Interaction

Digestate and CO2 used as fertilizer/nutrients in greenhouses

By‐Product Biogas‐Greenhouse

Dry digestate and use it as fodder By‐Product Biogas‐Food/Feed

Digestate used as bio‐fertilizer By‐Product Biogas‐Agriculture

Separate nutrients in digestate for chemical processing

By‐Product Biogas‐Chemical/Cosmetics

Gases other than methane and CO2 captured and stored (e.g. H2)

By‐Product Biofuel General‐

Chemical/Cosmetics C02/Water from Ethanol production for Algae Production

Utility Ethanol‐Algae

Wet Stillage used for Animal Feed Direct (no drying)

Utility Ethanol‐Food/Feed

Dry stillage for biofertilizer By‐Product Biogas‐Agriculture

Waste water used for algae cultivation Utility Biofuel General‐Algae

Glycerol used as binding agent for wood pellets By‐Product Biodiesel‐Energy/Fuel

Use stillage for pellet production (energy) By‐Product Ethanol‐Energy/Fuel

Glycerol for healthcare and cosmetics industry By‐Product Biodiesel‐Chemical/Cosmetics

Glycerol combusted at other industries for energy


Glycerol from Swedish biodiesel used for By‐Product Biodiesel‐Chemical/Cosmetics

12

"Swedish Eco‐Soap"

Glycerol used as a carbon source in biological cleaning steps


C02 trapped from Ethanol, Biogas production for Greenhouses

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Greenhouse

C02 trapped from Ethanol, Biogas production used for synthetic fuel production

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Energy/Fuel

C02 capture at Ethanol and Biogas Plants By‐Product Biofuel General‐

Chemical/Cosmetics Waste water from biodiesel or ethanol production used for Salix production

By‐Product Biofuel General‐Agriculture

Waste heat from ethanol, biodiesel and biogas production used in swimming pools/swim halls

Utility Biofuel General‐Municipal

Waste heat from ethanol, biodiesel and biogas used in nearby greenhouses

Utility Biofuel General‐Greenhouse

13

Table 6: External to Biofuel Industry Synergies External ‐‐> Biofuel Synergies



Interaction

Bioethanol from food residues (bread, kitchen wastes, etc.) (Marques et al 2008,Ebrahimi et al 2008,Tang et al 2008)

By‐Product Food/Feed‐Ethanol

Paper sludge for ethanol production (Martin et al 2009)

By‐Product Forestry/Paper‐Ethanol

Cheese whey lactose for ethanol production (Guimarães et al 2010,Zafar and Owais 2006,Kargi and Ozmıhcı 2006)


Biomass Wastes as biogas source (Kryvoruchko et al 2009)

By‐Product Forestry/Paper‐Biogas

Food industry wastes as biogas source (Rani and Nand 2004,Nieves et al 2011)

By‐Product Food/Feed‐Biogas

Fruit industry wastes as biogas source (Llaneza Coalla et al 2009)


Animal by‐products as biogas source (Hejnfelt and Angelidaki 2009,Mueller 2007a)


Dairy wastes as biogas source (Göblös et al 2008)


Processing waste water for biogas production (Stoica et al 2009)

By‐Product Municipal‐Biogas

Algae for biodiesel production (Bastianoni et al 2008,Brennan and Owende 2010)

By‐Product Algae‐Biodiesel

Biodiesel from waste oils (Chung et al 2009,Haas 2005a,Lin and Li 2009)

By‐Product Food/Feed‐Biodiesel

Biodiesel from sewage sludge (Angerbauer et al 2008,Pokoo‐Aikins et al 2010)

By‐Product Municipal‐Biodiesel

Biodiesel production from tall oil fatty acids (White et al 2011)

By‐Product Forestry/Paper‐Biodiesel

Meat industry residues for biodiesel production (Toscano et al 2011,Jørgensen et al 2012,Andersen and Weinbach 2010)


Municipal Sewage Sludge for Biogas Production (Tezel et al 2011)

By‐Product Muncipal‐Biogas

Ley crops used for biogas production (Blokhina et al 2011)

By‐Product Agriculture‐Biogas

Anaerobic digestion of household food waste (Bernstad and la Cour Jansen 2011,Krzystek et al 2001)


Integration of ethanol production into a combined heat and power plant (Starfelt et al 2010)

Utility Energy/Fuel‐Ethanol

Wastewater algae used to produce acetone, butanol and ethanol (Ellis et al)

By‐Product Algae‐Ethanol



Interaction

Other fatty acids for biodiesel production, By‐Product Chemical/Cosmetics‐Biodiesel

14

MeOH, Prop‐OH, etc.

Potato Chip/Snack Food waste vegetable oil (WVO) used for biodiesel production


Potato Chip/Snack Food by‐products (organic) used for biogas production


Potato Chip/Snack Food by‐products (Potato Skins) used for ethanol production


Animal fats from slaughtering at nearby farm used for biodiesel


Animal Wastes from farm used for biogas production


Algae used for oil press, oil extracted for biodiesel production

By‐Product Algae‐Biodiesel

Algae used for oil press, oil extracted for biodiesel production, algae then used for later ethanol fermentation and subsequent biogas processes

By‐Product Algae‐Biogas

Synthetic diesel Production produces alcohol as a by‐product, this can be used for biodiesel production or biogas production

By‐Product Energy/Fuel‐Biodiesel

Collaboration with municipal fat collector for biodiesel production


Use fat separators from car washes, restaurants, etc. for biodiesel production (if quality is low, for biogas production)


Flour production must separate all oil in flour to increase shelf‐life. Used for biodiesel.


Algae from Baltic Sea used for biogas production (Basically a free raw material)

By‐Product Algae‐Biogas

Household wastes for biogas production (organic material ‐‐> Biogas)


Household wastes for ethanol production (fruits, shells, etc. ‐‐‐> ethanol production)

By‐Product Municipal‐Ethanol

Other industries with WVO used for Biodiesel production


5 UNIQUE SYNERGIES FROM LITERATURE REVIEW

From the aforementioned synergies/articles the following lists have been produced to provide a summary of all unique synergies. When several synergies are of a similar theme, they have been summed into one type of unique synergy, although the feedstocks may be very different. For example, food industry synergies can be of many different types including fruits, vegetables, fats, dairy, etc.

15

5.1 Ethanol Synergies

Ethanol DDGS for human food applications (Champagne 2007,Robinson et al 2008) DDGS for animal feed(Llaneza Coalla et al 2009,Mueller 2007a) Integration with Extrusion technology for food/fodder production(Llaneza Coalla et al

2009) DDGS used as filler for bioplastics(Saunders and Rosentrater 2009,Llaneza Coalla et al

2009,Kale et al 2007,Karinen and Krause 2006) Combustion of DDGS as a fuel source (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009,Doušková et al

2010) Corn Oil for biodiesel production(Saunders and Rosentrater 2009) Fertilizer Production (Saunders and Rosentrater 2009) Construction materials(Saunders and Rosentrater 2009,Kale et al 2007,Karinen and

Krause 2006) Bioethanol from food residues (bread, kitchen wastes, etc.(Marques et al 2008,Ebrahimi

et al 2008,Palmarola-Adrados et al 2005)) Paper sludge for ethanol production(Tang et al 2008) Cheese whey lactose for ethanol production(Guimarães et al 2010,Zafar and Owais

2006,Kargi and Ozmıhcı 2006) Ethanol DDGS and syrup for biogas production(Saunders and Rosentrater 2009)

5.2 Biogas Synergies

Biomass Wastes as biogas source(Kryvoruchko et al 2009) Biogas digestate used as solid fuel(Kratzeisen et al 2010) Digestate used as particle board fibers (Zheng et al 2009) Household wastes as biogas source(Krzystek et al 2001) Food industry wastes as biogas source(Hou and Zheng 2009)

o Fruit industry wastes as biogas source(Llaneza Coalla et al 2009) o Animal by-products as biogas source(Hejnfelt and Angelidaki 2009,Mueller

2007a) o Dairy wastes as biogas source (Donkin et al 2009b)

Carbon dioxide from biogas upgrading for greenhouses/plant source(Jaffrin et al 2003) Ethanol stillage as biogas source(Doušková et al 2010,Wilkie et al 2000) Digestate used as fertilizer (Sager 2007) Ethanol production heat used for biogas process(Odhiambo et al 2009,Pfeffer et al 2007) Municipal solid wastes as biogas residue(Haas 2005b) Processing waste water for biogas production(Stoica et al 2009) Oil cake as biogas source(Ramachandran et al 2007) Biogas digestate used as feed (Sehgal and Sehgal 2002) Ley Crops for biogas production (Blokhina et al 2011) Biogas digestate used to worm farming (Surindra 2010)

16

5.3 Biodiesel Synergies from Literature Review

Biodiesel by-products used as carbon filters(Fernández-Álvarez et al 2007,Encinar et al 2007,Fernando et al 2007)

Glycerol to biogas production(Siles López et al 2009,Yazdani and Gonzalez 2007b,Shams Yazdani and Gonzalez 2008)

Biodiesel used as remediation agent for treatment of oil spills(Burström and Korhonen 2001)

Algae for biodiesel production(Chertow 1999,Wan Ngah and Hanafiah 2008) Glycerol added to gasoline as fuel extender (Kiatkittipong et al 2011) Biodiesel from waste oils (WVO, fish oil, animal tallow, etc.)(Chung et al 2009,Haas

2005a) Glycerol used to produce hydrogen (Slinn et al 2008,Fountoulakis and Manios 2009) Glycerol used to produce ethanol, formate and hydrogen(Swedish Biogas International

2009) Biodiesel from sewage sludge(Demirbas 2000,Börjesson 2006) Glycerol as automotive fuel (Fernando et al 2007,Kiatkittipong et al 2011) Glycerol used as animal feed(Donkin et al 2009a) Meat industry by-products for biodiesel production (Toscano et al 2011,Jørgensen et al

2012,Andersen and Weinbach 2010)

5.4 General Synergies in the Biofuel Industry

Integration with CHP Plant (Starfelt et al 2010)

6 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

The literature review produced a large number of possible synergies to handle external and biofuel by-products. Among the 123 final synergy articles produced, biogas synergies seem to be a very popular option for the handling of industrial wastes and biomass. Algal biofuels were not as apparent as originally thought though some applications have been provided for the production of oil for biodiesel. Biodiesel synergies consisted primarily of the handling of waste oils for biodiesel production and the use of glycerol for a wide array of applications from vehicle fuel to filters. In the production of ethanol, the use of DDGS for various applications is very common and many possible synergies were produced. However, not many further applications for ethanol by-products have been uncovered though several articles deal with the use of different raw materials (which are industrial by-products) for the production of ethanol. Furthermore, there seems to be a large number of articles concerned with the production of hydrogen from the biofuels themselves, especially for the production of ethanol in various forms and thereafter utilizing the ethanol to produce hydrogen. Only one of these articles was highlighted for this literature review. Beyond hydrogen production, 2nd generation ethanol production was plentiful in the literature.

17

7 REFERENCES

Andersen, O. and J. Weinbach. 2010. Residual animal fat and fish for biodiesel production. Potentials in Norway. Biomass and Bioenergy 34(8: 1183-1188.

Angerbauer, C., M. Siebenhofer, M. Mittelbach, and G. M. Guebitz. 2008. Conversion of sewage sludge into lipids by Lipomyces starkeyi for biodiesel production. Bioresource technology 99(8: 3051-3056.

Bastianoni, S., F. Coppola, E. Tiezzi, A. Colacevich, F. Borghini, and S. Focardi. 2008. Biofuel potential production from the Orbetello lagoon macroalgae: A comparison with sunflower feedstock. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(7: 619-628.

Bernstad, A. and J. la Cour Jansen. 2011. A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste – A Swedish full-scale case study. Waste Management 31(8: 1879-1896.

Blokhina, Y. N., A. Prochnow, M. Plöchl, C. Luckhaus, and M. Heiermann. 2011. Concepts and profitability of biogas production from landscape management grass. Bioresource technology 102(2: 2086-2092.

Bohon, M. D., B. A. Metzger, W. P. Linak, C. J. King, and W. L. Roberts. 2011. Glycerol combustion and emissions. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33(2: 2717-2724.

Börjesson, P. 2006. Energibalans för bioetanol-En kunskapsöversikt (Energy Balance of Bioethanol- A Review). IMES/EESS Report No. 59.

Brennan, L. and P. Owende. 2010. Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(2: 557-577.

Burström, F. and J. Korhonen. 2001. Municipalities and Industrial Ecology: Reconsidering Municipal Environmental Management. Sustainable Development 936-46.

Chagas, B., F. Freitas, L. Mafra, J. Cortez, R. Oliveira, and M. A. M. Reis. 2010. Production of chitin-glucan complex (CGC) from biodiesel industry byproduct. Journal of Biotechnology 150, Supplement(0: 381-382.

Champagne, P. 2007. Feasibility of producing bio-ethanol from waste residues: A Canadian perspective: Feasibility of producing bio-ethanol from waste residues in Canada. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50(3: 211-230.

Chertow, M. R.1999. Industrial Symbiosis: a multi-firm approach to sustainability. Proceedings of the 1999 Greening of Industry Network Conference.

Chung, K., J. Kim, and K. Lee. 2009. Biodiesel production by transesterification of duck tallow with methanol on alkali catalysts. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(1: 155-158.

18

De Paoli, F., A. Bauer, C. Leonhartsberger, B. Amon, and T. Amon. 2011. Utilization of by-products from ethanol production as substrate for biogas production. Bioresource technology 102(11: 6621-6624.

de Sousa, J. R., J. A. da Costa Correia, J. G. L. de Almeida, S. Rodrigues, O. D. L. Pessoa, V. M. M. Melo, and L. R. B. Gonçalves. 2011. Evaluation of a co-product of biodiesel production as carbon source in the production of biosurfactant by P. aeruginosa MSIC02. Process Biochemistry 46(9: 1831-1839.

Demirbas, A. 2000. Conversion of biomass using glycerin to liquid fuel for blending gasoline as alternative engine fuel. Energy Conversion and Management 41(16: 1741-1748.

DeVuyst, E. A., S. W. Pryor, G. Lardy, W. Eide, and R. Wiederholt. 2011. Cattle, ethanol, and biogas: Does closing the loop make economic sense? Agricultural Systems 104(8: 609-614.

Diebel, W., M. M. Reddy, M. Misra, and A. Mohanty. 2012. Material property characterization of co-products from biofuel industries: Potential uses in value-added biocomposites. Biomass and Bioenergy 37(0: 88-96.

Donkin, S. S., S. L. Koser, H. M. White, P. H. Doane, and M. J. Cecava. 2009a. Feeding value of glycerol as a replacement for corn grain in rations fed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of dairy science 92(10: 5111-5119.

Donkin, S. S., S. L. Koser, H. M. White, P. H. Doane, and M. J. Cecava. 2009b. Feeding value of glycerol as a replacement for corn grain in rations fed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of dairy science 92(10: 5111-5119.

Doušková, I., F. Kaštánek, Y. Maléterová, P. Kaštánek, J. Doucha, and V. Zachleder. 2010. Utilization of distillery stillage for energy generation and concurrent production of valuable microalgal biomass in the sequence: Biogas-cogeneration-microalgae-products. Energy Conversion and Management 51(3: 606-611.

Ebrahimi, F., M. Khanahmadi, S. Roodpeyma, and M. J. Taherzadeh. 2008. Ethanol production from bread residues. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(4: 333-337.

Egeskog, A., G. Berndes, F. Freitas, S. Gustafsson, and G. Sparovek. 2011. Integrating bioenergy and food production—A case study of combined ethanol and dairy production in Pontal, Brazil. Energy for Sustainable Development 15(1: 8-16.

Ehimen, E. A., Z. F. Sun, C. G. Carrington, E. J. Birch, and J. J. Eaton-Rye. 2011. Anaerobic digestion of microalgae residues resulting from the biodiesel production process. Applied Energy 88(10: 3454-3463.

Eliche-Quesada, D., S. Martínez-Martínez, L. Pérez-Villarejo, F. J. Iglesias-Godino, C. Martínez-García, and F. A. Corpas-Iglesias. Valorization of biodiesel production residues in making porous clay brick. Fuel Processing Technology(0: .

Ellis, J. T., N. N. Hengge, R. C. Sims, and C. D. Miller. Acetone, Butanol, and Ethanol Production from Wastewater Algae. Bioresource technology(In Press, Corrected Proof: .

19

Encinar, J. M., J. F. González, and A. Rodríguez-Reinares. 2007. Ethanolysis of used frying oil. Biodiesel preparation and characterization. Fuel Processing Technology 88(5: 513-522.

Fernández-Álvarez, P., J. Vila, J. M. Garrido, M. Grifoll, G. Feijoo, and J. M. Lema. 2007. Evaluation of biodiesel as bioremediation agent for the treatment of the shore affected by the heavy oil spill of the Prestige. Journal of hazardous materials 147(3: 914-922.

Fernando, S., S. Adhikari, K. Kota, and R. Bandi. 2007. Glycerol based automotive fuels from future biorefineries. Fuel 86(17-18: 2806-2809.

Ferrero, F., M. Periolatto, G. Rovero, and M. Giansetti. 2011. Alcohol-assisted dyeing processes: a chemical substitution study. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(12: 1377-1384.

Foo, K. Y. and B. H. Hameed. 2009. Utilization of biodiesel waste as a renewable resource for activated carbon: Application to environmental problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(9: 2495-2504.

Fountoulakis, M. S. and T. Manios. 2009. Enhanced methane and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste and agro-industrial by-products co-digested with crude glycerol. Bioresource technology 100(12: 3043-3047.

Gell, K., J. van Groenigen, and M. L. Cayuela. 2011. Residues of bioenergy production chains as soil amendments: Immediate and temporal phytotoxicity. Journal of hazardous materials 186(2–3: 2017-2025.

Göblös, S., P. Portörő, D. Bordás, M. Kálmán, and I. Kiss. 2008. Comparison of the effectivities of two-phase and single-phase anaerobic sequencing batch reactors during dairy wastewater treatment. Renewable Energy 33(5: 960-965.

Green, B. N., C. D. Johnson, and A. Adams. 2006. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 5(3: 101-117.

Guimarães, P. M. R., J. A. Teixeira, and L. Domingues. 2010. Fermentation of lactose to bio-ethanol by yeasts as part of integrated solutions for the valorisation of cheese whey. Biotechnology Advances 28(3: 375-384.

Haas, M. J. 2005a. Improving the economics of biodiesel production through the use of low value lipids as feedstocks: vegetable oil soapstock. Fuel Processing Technology 86(10: 1087-1096.

Haas, M. J. 2005b. Improving the economics of biodiesel production through the use of low value lipids as feedstocks: vegetable oil soapstock. Fuel Processing Technology 86(10: 1087-1096.

Hejnfelt, A. and I. Angelidaki. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(8: 1046-1054.

20

Hou, Z. and D. Zheng. 2009. Solar utility and renewability evaluation for biodiesel production process. Applied Thermal Engineering 29(14-15: 3169-3174.

Jaffrin, A., N. Bentounes, A. M. Joan, and S. Makhlouf. 2003. Landfill Biogas for heating Greenhouses and providing Carbon Dioxide Supplement for Plant Growth. Biosystems Engineering 86(1: 113-123.

Jørgensen, A., P. Bikker, and I. T. Herrmann. 2012. Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions from poultry fat biodiesel. Journal of Cleaner Production 24(0: 85-91.

Kale, A., F. Zhu, and M. Cheryan. 2007. Separation of high-value products from ethanol extracts of corn by chromatography. Industrial Crops and Products 26(1: 44-53.

Kargi, F. and S. Ozmıhcı. 2006. Utilization of cheese whey powder (CWP) for ethanol fermentations: Effects of operating parameters. Enzyme and microbial technology 38(5: 711-718.

Karinen, R. S. and A. O. I. Krause. 2006. New biocomponents from glycerol. Applied Catalysis A: General 306128-133.

Kiatkittipong, W., S. Suwanmanee, N. Laosiripojana, P. Praserthdam, and S. Assabumrungrat. 2010. Cleaner gasoline production by using glycerol as fuel extender. Fuel Processing Technology 91(5: 456-460.

Kiatkittipong, W., S. Wongsakulphasatch, N. Tintan, N. Laosiripojana, P. Praserthdam, and S. Assabumrungrat. 2011. Gasoline upgrading by self-etherification with ethanol on modified beta-zeolite. Fuel Processing Technology 92(10: 1999-2004.

Klopfenstein, T. J., G. E. Erickson, and V. R. Bremer. 2007. Feeding Corn Milling Byproducts to Feedlot Cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 23(2: 223-245.

Kratzeisen, M., N. Starcevic, M. Martinov, C. Maurer, and J. Müller. 2010. Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel. Fuel 89(9: 2544-2548.

Kryvoruchko, V., A. Machmüller, V. Bodiroza, B. Amon, and T. Amon. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of by-products of sugar beet and starch potato processing. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(4: 620-627.

Krzystek, L., S. Ledakowicz, H. Kahle, and K. Kaczorek. 2001. Degradation of household biowaste in reactors. Journal of Biotechnology 92(2: 103-112.

Lin, C. and R. Li. 2009. Fuel properties of biodiesel produced from the crude fish oil from the soapstock of marine fish. Fuel Processing Technology 90(1: 130-136.

Liu, S. X., M. Singh, and G. Inglett. 2011. Effect of incorporation of distillers’ dried grain with solubles (DDGS) on quality of cornbread. LWT - Food Science and Technology 44(3: 713-718.

21

Liu, X., P. R. Jensen, and M. Workman. 2012. Bioconversion of crude glycerol feedstocks into ethanol by Pachysolen tannophilus. Bioresource technology 104(0: 579-586.

Liu, Y., C. M. J. Koh, and L. Ji. 2011. Bioconversion of crude glycerol to glycolipids in Ustilago maydis. Bioresource technology 102(4: 3927-3933.

Llaneza Coalla, H., J. M. Blanco Fernández, M. A. Morís Morán, and M. R. López Bobo. 2009. Biogas generation apple pulp. Bioresource technology 100(17: 3843-3847.

Marques, S., L. Alves, J. C. Roseiro, and F. M. Gírio. 2008. Conversion of recycled paper sludge to ethanol by SHF and SSF using Pichia stipitis. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(5: 400-406.

Martin, M. and J. Fonseca. 2012. A Systematic Literature Review of Biofuel Synergies . LIU-IEI-R--10/0092--SE.

Martin, M., J. Ivner, N. Svensson, and M. Eklund. 2009. Biofuel Synergy Development: Classification and Identification of Synergies using Industrial Symbiosis. Linköping University-IEI Report Number- LIU-IEI-R--09/0063--SE.

Martin, M. and M. Eklund. 2011. Improving the environmental performance of biofuels with industrial symbiosis. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(5: 1747-1755.

McNeil, J., P. Day, and F. Sirovski. Glycerine from biodiesel: The perfect diesel fuel. Process Safety and Environmental Protection(0: .

Medeiros, M. A., C. M. M. Leite, and R. M. Lago. 2012. Use of glycerol by-product of biodiesel to produce an efficient dust suppressant. Chemical Engineering Journal 180(0: 364-369.

Miao, X. and Q. Wu. 2006. Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil. Bioresource technology 97(6: 841-846.

Moore, A. 2008a. Biofuels are dead: long live biofuels(?) – part two. New Biotechnology 25(2-3: 96-100.

Moore, A. 2008b. Biofuels are dead: long live biofuels(?) – part two. New Biotechnology 25(2-3: 96-100.

Mueller, S. 2007a. Manure's allure: Variation of the financial, environmental, and economic benefits from combined heat and power systems integrated with anaerobic digesters at hog farms across geographic and economic regions. Renewable Energy 32(2: 248-256.

Mueller, S. 2007b. Manure's allure: Variation of the financial, environmental, and economic benefits from combined heat and power systems integrated with anaerobic digesters at hog farms across geographic and economic regions. Renewable Energy 32(2: 248-256.

Nieves, D. C., K. Karimi, and I. S. Horváth. 2011. Improvement of biogas production from oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB). Industrial Crops and Products 34(1: 1097-1101.

22

Nunes, A. A., A. S. Franca, and L. S. Oliveira. 2009. Activated carbons from waste biomass: An alternative use for biodiesel production solid residues. Bioresource technology 100(5: 1786-1792.

Odhiambo, J. O., E. Martinsson, S. Soren, P. Mboya, and J. Onyango. 2009. Integration water, energy and sanitation solution for stand-alone settlements. Desalination 248(1-3: 570-577.

Palmarola-Adrados, B., P. Chotěborská, M. Galbe, and G. Zacchi. 2005. Ethanol production from non-starch carbohydrates of wheat bran. Bioresource technology 96(7: 843-850.

Pfeffer, M., W. Wukovits, G. Beckmann, and A. Friedl. 2007. Analysis and decrease of the energy demand of bioethanol-production by process integration. Applied Thermal Engineering 27(16: 2657-2664.

Piotrowska, P., M. Zevenhoven, M. Hupa, J. Giuntoli, and W. de Jong. 2011. Residues from the production of biofuels for transportation: Characterization and ash sintering tendency. Fuel Processing Technology(In Press: .

Pokoo-Aikins, G., A. Heath, R. A. Mentzer, M. S. Mannan, W. J. Rogers, and M. M. El-Halwagi. 2010. A Multi-Criteria Approach to Screening Alternatives for Converting Sewage Sludge to Biodiesel. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries In Press, Accepted Manuscript.

Pontzen, F., W. Liebner, V. Gronemann, M. Rothaemel, and B. Ahlers. 2011. CO2-based methanol and DME – Efficient technologies for industrial scale production. Catalysis Today 171(1: 242-250.

Powell, E. E. and G. A. Hill. 2010. Carbon dioxide neutral, integrated biofuel facility. Energy 35(12: 4582-4586.

Quintella, S. A., R. M. A. Saboya, D. C. Salmin, D. S. Novaes, A. S. Araújo, M. C. G. Albuquerque, and C. L. Cavalcante Jr. 2012. Transesterificarion of soybean oil using ethanol and mesoporous silica catalyst. Renewable Energy 38(1: 136-140.

Ramachandran, S., S. K. Singh, C. Larroche, C. R. Soccol, and A. Pandey. 2007. Oil cakes and their biotechnological applications – A review. Bioresource technology 98(10: 2000-2009.

Rani, D. S. and K. Nand. 2004. Ensilage of pineapple processing waste for methane generation. Waste Management 24(5: 523-528.

Robinson, P. H., K. Karges, and M. L. Gibson. 2008. Nutritional evaluation of four co-product feedstuffs from the motor fuel ethanol distillation industry in the Midwestern USA. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146(3-4: 345-352.

Sager, M. 2007. Trace and nutrient elements in manure, dung and compost samples in Austria. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39(6: 1383-1390.

23

Sánchez, E. A., M. A. D'Angelo, and R. A. Comelli. Hydrogen production from glycerol on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy In Press, Corrected Proof.

Sanghoon, K. 2011. Production of composites by using gliadin as a bonding material. Journal of cereal science 54(1: 168-172.

Saunders, J. A. and K. A. Rosentrater. 2009. Survey of US fuel ethanol plants. Bioresource technology 100(13: 3277-3284.

Sehgal, H. S. and G. K. Sehgal. 2002. Aquacultural and socio-economic aspects of processing carps into some value-added products. Bioresource technology 82(3: 291-293.

Shams Yazdani, S. and R. Gonzalez. 2008. Engineering Escherichia coli for the efficient conversion of glycerol to ethanol and co-products. Metabolic engineering 10(6: 340-351.

Siles López, J. Á., Martín Santos,María de los Ángeles, A. F. Chica Pérez, and A. Martín Martín. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacturing. Bioresource technology 100(23: 5609-5615.

Slinn, M., K. Kendall, C. Mallon, and J. Andrews. 2008. Steam reforming of biodiesel by-product to make renewable hydrogen. Bioresource technology 99(13: 5851-5858.

Starfelt, F., E. Thorin, E. Dotzauer, and J. Yan. 2010. Performance evaluation of adding ethanol production into an existing combined heat and power plant. Bioresource technology 101(2: 613-618.

Stoica, A., M. Sandberg, and O. Holby. 2009. Energy use and recovery strategies within wastewater treatment and sludge handling at pulp and paper mills. Bioresource technology 100(14: 3497-3505.

Surindra, S. 2010. Potential of domestic biogas digester slurry in vermitechnology. Bioresource technology 101(14: 5419-5425.

Swedish Biogas International.2009. Spendrups BSG handling options and figures provided by Spendrups to SBI. Spendrups BSG handling options and figures provided by Spendrups to SBI.

Tang, Y., Y. Koike, K. Liu, M. An, S. Morimura, X. Wu, and K. Kida. 2008. Ethanol production from kitchen waste using the flocculating yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain KF-7. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(11: 1037-1045.

Tezel, U., M. Tandukar, and S. G. Pavlostathis. 2011. 6.35 - Anaerobic Biotreatment of Municipal Sewage Sludge. In Comprehensive Biotechnology (Second Edition) , edited by Editor-in-Chief: Murray Moo-Young . Burlington: Academic Press.

Toscano, L., G. Montero, M. Stoytcheva, H. Campbell, and A. Lambert. 2011. Preliminary assessment of biodiesel generation from meat industry residues in Baja California, Mexico. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(1: 26-31.

24

Vaughn, S. F., N. A. Deppe, D. E. Palmquist, and M. A. Berhow. 2011. Extracted sweet corn tassels as a renewable alternative to peat in greenhouse substrates. Industrial Crops and Products 33(2: 514-517.

Visser, E. M., D. O. Filho, M. A. Martins, and B. L. Steward. 2011. Bioethanol production potential from Brazilian biodiesel co-products. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(1: 489-494.

Wan Ngah, W. S. and M. A. K. M. Hanafiah. 2008. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review. Bioresource technology 99(10: 3935-3948.

White, K., N. Lorenz, T. Potts, W. Roy Penney, R. Babcock, A. Hardison, E. A. Canuel, and J. A. Hestekin. 2011. Production of biodiesel fuel from tall oil fatty acids via high temperature methanol reaction. Fuel 90(11: 3193-3199.

Wilkie, A. C., K. J. Riedesel, and J. M. Owens. 2000. Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 19(2: 63-102.

Yazdani, S. S. and R. Gonzalez. 2007a. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Current opinion in biotechnology 18(3: 213-219.

Yazdani, S. S. and R. Gonzalez. 2007b. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Current opinion in biotechnology 18(3: 213-219.

Zafar, S. and M. Owais. 2006. Ethanol production from crude whey by Kluyveromyces marxianus. Biochemical engineering journal 27(3: 295-298.

Zheng, Y., Z. Pan, R. Zhang, H. M. El-Mashad, J. Pan, and B. M. Jenkins. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of saline creeping wild ryegrass for biogas production and pretreatment of particleboard material. Bioresource technology 100(4: 1582-1588.

Documents

A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE EVIEW OF BIOFUEL …liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:306437/FULLTEXT02.pdf · A Systematic Literature Review of Biofuel Synergies ... Often biofuels are