Upload
others
View
2
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
multiconsult.no
1
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
Program • 14.00 – 14.20 Introduction – relevant geophysical investigations in geotechnical field
surveys, by Rolf Sandven, Multiconsult, Norway
• 14.20 – 14.50 Use of shallow seismic measurements – what information can analyses of surface waves (MASW) provide? by Mike Long, University College Dublin, Ireland
• 14.50 – 15.10 Break with refreshments
• 15.10 – 15.30 Experiences with 2D resistivity measurements (Electrical Resistivity Tomography) at the surface, by Inger Lise Solberg, National Geological Survey, Norway
• 15.30 – 16.10 CPTU with resistivity measurements (R-CPTU) – a combination of geophysical and geotechnical measurements
- Short introduction of the method
- Swedish experiences from R-CPTU and ERT investigations in the Gøta elv valley,
by Hjørdis Løfroth, SGI, Sweden
• 16.10 – 16.30 News and experiences in geotechnical geophysics in Finland, by Pauli Saksa, Geosto OY, Finland
• 16.30 – 16.50 Will future soil investigations be carried out by airborne devices? Information about Airborne Electromagnetic Measurements (AEM), by Andreas Pfaffhuber, NGI, Norway
• 16.50 - 17.00 Final remarks, short discussion
multiconsult.no
Nordic field committee meeting 2013 – NGF meeting October 15th 2013
Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations– short introduction
Senior geotechnical advisor Rolf Sandven, Multiconsult
multiconsult.no
3
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
Content – Introduction - background
–Geotechnical use of geophysical data
– Determination of shear wave velocity vs and shear modulus Gmax
• Seismic CPTU (S-CPTU)
• Seismic analysis of shallow waves (MASW), (S-)CPTU)
• Bender element measurements (Lab)
– Determination of resistivity/electric conductivity
– Surface resistivity measurements (2D ERT)
– CPTU Down-the-hole resistivity (R-CPTU)
– Airborne Electromagnetic Measurements (AEM)
–Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
– Possibilities and limitations in practical use
multiconsult.no
4
Use of geophysical data
• Some remarks from S. Foti & T. Butcher (ISC 2004):
• «Capabilities and limitations of geophysical tests are not always well understood. This is not helped by lack of relationships between geophysically measured properties and the geotechnical characteristics of the ground needed for design»
• «Ground investigations should be problem driven. Geophysical measurements should focus on problems that they can help to solve»
• This was ten years ago, where are we now?
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
5
Use of geophysical data – present trends
• Geophysical investigation methods have been quite common in geological surveys for many years
• More recently, geophysical investigation methods are also increasingly used in geotechnical investigations, due to e.g.: - More rational processing of test data due to growth of
computational power - Increasing needs to detect special geological phenomena, such as
e.g. mapping of quick clay areas - New requirements in present codes, e.g. better knowledge of shear
wave velocity for earthquake design (Eurocode 8) • More interaction between geophysicists and geotechnical engineers
in an increasing number of projects may stimulate further use?
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
6
Geophysical principles – shear wave velocity
multiconsult.no
7
• Seismic methods Geotechnical field methods, e.g. S-CPTU (seismic CPTU)
Deep seismic investigations, e.g. refraction-/reflection seismic
Analyses of surface waves – shallow seismic, e.g. MASW
• Time-distance diagrams give seismic velocities
• Used for determination of stratification and depth to bedrock
• Processing of measured data gives a shear velocity profile vs
• The shear wave velocity gives Gmax = rvs
2, which can be used in e.g. earthquake analyses
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
8
Seismic CPTU (S-CPTU) Sonic wave triggered by blow on a percussive
plate on the surface
One (or preferably more) receiving unit(s) on the probe
Provides the average velocity of vs in an approximately vertical direction
Presently based on cable transfer of recorded data
Detail of percussive plate
Test principle Equipment for S-CPTU
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
9
MASW: Multi-channel analysis of surface waves • Similar principles as used in conventional seismic investigations
Generation of waves in the soil layers, extension ~ 10-15 m Focus: Detection and measurement of surface waves (R- and S-waves)
• A large number of geophones on the surface allows elimination of background
noise
• One energy release sufficient, e.g. use of a sledgehammer or similar
• The method can be used to detect velocity inversions (dense layer
over soft layer)
• The processing of results provide a profile of shear wave velocity/shear
modulus versus depth
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
Low frequency geophones (4.5Hz)
(1) Generation of surface wave
multiconsult.no
11
MASW – Multi-channel analyses of surface waves
Apex Geoservices for Multiconsult, Seut, Fredikstad 2012
multiconsult.no
12
Determination of shear wave velocity using bender elements
Used for determination of initial shear modulus Gmax in the
laboratory
Important parameter for e.g. earthquake analyses
In a triaxial test, the shear wave velocity is determined:
before consolidation of the sample
after consolidation, at start of shearing (Gmax)
at selected strain levels in the shearing phase (G)
Test time per measurement : 1-3 milliseconds
Somewhat more cumbersome preparation of test sample compared to an ordinary triaxial test
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
Bender element receiver in pedestal
Bender element transmitter in top cap
Vs,G
Bender element: Shear wave velocity measurements in conventional triaxial test
Screen display during measurements
multiconsult.no
14
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
15
Geophysical principles – resistivity measurements
multiconsult.no
16
Resistivity measurements • Test principle
Utilize variations in the specific resistivity in the soil layers (electric resistance)
An electric current (I) is applied to the soil between two electrodes, the electric voltage (V) is measured between two or more neighbouring electrodes. Different electrode configurations may be applied.
Both airborne (AEM), surface (2D, ERT) and down-the-hole measurements (1D, R-CPTU) can be carried out made, but does not necessarily yield the same resistivity at the same point in the ground
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
17
• Classification of specific resistivity Based on previous studies and experiences in Norway, Sweden and
Canada
Gradual transition and overlap between some soil types
Specific resistivity influenced by local variations in mineralogy, salinity, density, pore water chemistry, degree of saturation etc.
Influence on soil resistivity from various soil properties, soil constituents and geochemical properties not properly known?
Salt, marine clay has the lowest resistivity: 1-10 Ωm
Leached clay/possible quick clay: 10-100 Ωm
Silt: 80 – 200 Ωm
Dry crusted clay, coarse materials: over 100 Ωm
Rock: several thousands Ωm
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
18
• Airborne electromagnetic measurements (AEM) AEM systems transmits an electromagnetic
signal from an airborne platform («bird»)
The signals induces secondary currents that are picked up by receiver coils units on the «bird»
The signals are sensitive to the subsurface electrical resistivity
The method may be used for various purposes, including mapping of quick clay areas
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
Geo-elektriske målinger – utstyr, gjennomføring og muligheter
Electrode
Electrode-configuration
2D resistivity measurements from the surface (Electrical Resistivity Tomography)
multiconsult.no
20
Example of interpretation of an ERT resistivity profile– E6 Haga-Skjerdingstad
Quick clay from soundings/lab
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
21
• Use of R-CPTU (1D resistivity) Special module mounted behind a
conventional CPTU-probe
Continuous resistivity measurements in one boring (down-the-hole)
Small influence volume and more local measurement compared to 2D ERT
1D and 2D resistivity measurements may be combined, but: Relatively good agreement for homogenous ground
conditions
Larger discrepancies when 3D-effects and inhomogenous conditions occur
Input from R-CPTU may improve interpretation of ERT results
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
22
Example of R-CPTU profile in quick clay
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
quick clay
multiconsult.no
23
Use of geophysical data - Possibilities
• Geophysical investigations may provide important information in the early investigation stages
• Quick mobilisation and cost-effective mapping of large areas (e.g. road projects, area mapping)
• Results from geophysical investigations provides continuous information between boreholes
• Geophysical methods are mostly non-intrusive, i.e. no disturbance of the soil during measurements
• Results may be used for optimal planning of traditional geotechnical investigations, particularly attractive in larger projects
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
24
Use of geophysical data – Limitations
• Limited knowledge of geophysical methods among most geotechnical engineers
• Limited availability of test facilities, few companies perform geophysical measurements
• Some methods are sensitive to infrastructure in the ground, e.g. pipelines, cables etc.
• Interpretation and processing of results usually require special software and know-how
• Quality of interpretation may be somewhat influenced by boundary effects and topography of soil and rock strata
• Results need to be «calibrated» and compared to results from ordinary geotechnical methods
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations
multiconsult.no
25
Use of geophysical data – other features
• Important with good planning and interaction between geophysical and geotechnical expertise
• The quality of the interpretations is influenced by the basic knowledge of the investigated area
• At present, long waiting time for geotechnical investigations, probably less on geophysical. Information can be obtained earlier and may be used in temporary evaluations
• Geophysical investigations may be carried out at locations with limited access for drillrigs
Nordic field committee meeting - NGF meeting 2013 Geophysical methods in geotechnical investigations