22
International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), © IAEME  289 FLEXURAL SAFETY COST OF OPTIMIZED REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS Mohammed S. Al-Ansari Civil Engineering Department Qatar University P.O. Box 2713 Doha Qatar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents an analytical model to estimate the cost of an optimized design of reinforced concrete slab sections base on structural safety. Flexural and optimized slab formulas for four types of reinforced concrete slabs simple one way slab, continuous one way slab, two - way solid slab on stiff beams, and flat plate that is a flat slab without drop panels and capital heads are derived base on ACI building code of design, material cost and optimization. The optimization constraints consist of upper and lower limits of depth and area of steel. Slab depth and area of reinforcing steel to be minimized to yield the optimal section. Optimized slab materials cost of concrete, reinforcing steel and formwork of all sections are computed and compared. Total cost factor TCF and other cost factors are developed to generalize and simplify the calculations of slab material cost. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the model capability of estimating the material cost of the slab for a desired level of structural safety. Keywords: Margin of Safety, Depth, Concrete, Steel, F ormwork, Optimization, Material cost, Cost Factors. INTRODUCTION Safety and reliability were used in the flexural design of reinforced concrete slabs of different sections using ultimate-strength design method USD under the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET) ISSN 0976 - 6480 (Print)  ISSN 0976 - 6499 (Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, July-December (2012), pp. 289-310  © IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijaret.asp Journal Impact Factor (2012): 2.7078 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com IJARET © I A E M E

flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    1/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    289

    FLEXURAL SAFETY COST OF OPTIMIZED REINFORCEDCONCRETE SLABS

    Mohammed S. Al-AnsariCivil Engineering Department

    Qatar UniversityP.O. Box 2713

    Doha QatarEmail: [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    This paper presents an analytical model to estimate the cost of an optimized design ofreinforced concrete slab sections base on structural safety. Flexural and optimized slab

    formulas for four types of reinforced concrete slabs simple one way slab, continuousone way slab, two - way solid slab on stiff beams, and flat plate that is a flat slabwithout drop panels and capital heads are derived base on ACI building code ofdesign, material cost and optimization. The optimization constraints consist of upperand lower limits of depth and area of steel. Slab depth and area of reinforcing steel tobe minimized to yield the optimal section. Optimized slab materials cost of concrete,reinforcing steel and formwork of all sections are computed and compared. Total costfactor TCF and other cost factors are developed to generalize and simplify thecalculations of slab material cost. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate themodel capability of estimating the material cost of the slab for a desired level ofstructural safety.

    Keywords: Margin of Safety, Depth, Concrete, Steel, Formwork, Optimization,Material cost, Cost Factors.

    INTRODUCTION

    Safety and reliability were used in the flexural design of reinforced concreteslabs of different sections using ultimate-strength design method USD under the

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH INENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)

    ISSN 0976 - 6480 (Print)ISSN 0976 - 6499 (Online)Volume 3, Issue 2, July-December (2012), pp. 289-310 IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijaret.aspJournal Impact Factor (2012): 2.7078 (Calculated by GISI)www.jifactor.com

    IJARET

    I A E M E

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    2/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    290

    provisions of ACI building code of design (1, 2, 3 and 4). Slabs are very importantstructure members and the most common shape of reinforced concrete slabs isrectangular cross section. Slabs with single reinforcement are the preliminary types ofslabs and the reinforcement is provided near the tension face of the slab. Slab sizes aremostly governed by the ultimate external bending moment Me, and the optimized

    section of reinforced concrete slabs could be achieved by minimizing the optimizationfunction of slab depth and reinforcing steel area (5, 6 and 7).This paper presents an analytical model to estimate the cost of an optimized design ofreinforced concrete slab sections with yield strength of nonprestressed reinforcing 420MPA and compression strength of concrete 30 MPA base on flexural capacity of theslab section that is the design moment strength and the sum of the load effects at thesection that is the external bending moment Me. Slab Flexural and optimized formulasfor four types of reinforced concrete slabs, simple one way slab, continuous one wayslab, two - way solid slabs on stiff beams, and flat plate that is a flat slab without droppanels and capital heads are derived base on ACI building code of design, materialcost and optimization. The optimization of slabs is formulated to achieve the best slab

    dimension that will give the most economical section to resist the external bendingmoment Me for a specified value of the design moment strength Mc base on desiredlevel of safety. The optimization is subjected to the design constraints of the buildingcode of design ACI such as maximum and minimum reinforcing steel area and upperand lower boundaries of slab dimensions (8, 9 and 10).The total cost of the slab materials is equal to the summation of the cost of theconcrete, steel and the formwork. Total cost factor TCF, cost factor of concrete CFC,Cost Factor of steel CFS, and cost factor of timber CFT are developed to generalizeand simplify the estimation of beam material cost. The slab is said to fail when theresistance of the slab is less than the action caused by the applied load. The slabresistance is measured by the design moment strength Mc and the slab action is

    measured by the external bending moment Me.The slab margin of safety is given by:

    = (1)Where

    = DesignMomentStrength= xternalbendingmoment= Marginofsafety

    Setting the margin of safety M in percentages will yield the factor of safety (F.S.)

    . . = 1 + (2)And = . . (2-a) = (1+ ) (2-b)

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    3/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    291

    FLEXURAL SLAB FORMULAS

    Four types of reinforced concrete slabs, simple one way slab, continuous one way slab,

    two way solid slab on stiff beams, and flat plate that is a flat slab without drop panels

    and capital heads with yield strength of nonprestressed reinforcing fy and compression

    strength of concrete f`c. The design moment strength Mc results from internal

    compressive force C and an internal force T separated by a lever arm. For the slabs

    with single reinforcement, Fig. 1

    Fig. 1 Rectangular slab cross section with reinforcement

    = 3

    = 0.85 ` 3-a= 3-b

    Having T = C from equilibrium, the compression area

    = . 3-c

    And the depth of the compression block

    = . 3-dThus, the design moment strength

    = 3-e

    T = As fy

    C = 0.85 f`c Ac

    a/2

    h d N.A.

    0.85 f`c

    b N.A. = Neutral Axis

    Ac

    As

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    4/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    292

    From flexural point of view a simple one way slab has a single moment, the

    continuous one way slab has two moments, two way solid slabs and flat slabs have six

    moments, four edge moments and two middle moments, Figs. 2,3,and 4.

    Where

    = Bending reduction factor= Specified yield strength of nonprestressed reinforcing` = Specified compression strength of concrete

    = Area of tension steel= Compression area

    = Effective depth

    =Depth of the compression block=Width of the slab cross section

    =Total depth of the slab cross sectionAg = Gross cross-sectional area of a concrete member

    Fig. 2 Simple one way slab moment per running meter

    M

    M

    L

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    5/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    293

    Fig.3 Continuous one way slab moments per running meter

    Fig.4 Two way slab moments of internal panel

    M1

    M M

    M1

    L L

    M 1

    M 2

    M 4

    M 3M 5M 6

    M 3

    M 6

    M 1

    M 4

    M 5

    L 1

    L 2

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    6/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    294

    SLAB OPTIMIZATION

    The optimization of slabs is formulated to achieve the best slab dimension that will

    give the most economical section to resist the external bending moment (Me) for a

    specified value of the design moment strength (Mc) base on selected margin of safety.

    The optimization is subjected to the constraints of the building code of design ACI for

    reinforcement and slab size dimensions. The optimization function of slab

    Minimize ( , , ) = - Mc (4)

    Must satisfy the following constraints:

    (4-a)

    (4-b) = 0.75 1 `

    (4-c)

    = . (4-d)

    1 = 0.85 ` 30 (4-e)1 = 0.85 0.008( ` 30) 0.65 ` > 30 (4-f)

    Where and are slab depth lower and upper bounds the upper bound is equal to300mm, one meter is constant slab width, and and are slab steelreinforcement area lower and upper bounds.

    SLAB FORMWORK MATERIALS

    The form work material is limited to slab bottom of 50 mm thickness and two sides of

    20 mm thickness each, Fig.5 .The formwork area AF of the slab

    = 2(20 ) + 50 (5)

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    7/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    295

    Fig. 5 Rectangular slab formwork material for sides and bottom

    SLAB COST ANALYSIS

    The total cost of the beam materials is equal to the summation of the cost of the

    concrete, steel and the formwork per square meter:

    =

    ( ) + ()

    + () (6)

    For simple one way slab

    =

    ( ) + ( + )()

    + () (7)

    For continuous one way slab

    =

    ( ) + ( + )()

    + ()

    + ( 1 )( ) (8)

    Where

    Cc = Cost of 1 m3

    of ready mix reinforced concrete in dollars

    20mm sheathing Slab side

    50mm Slab bottom (soffit)

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    8/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    296

    Cs = Cost of 1 Ton of steel in dollars

    Cf = Cost of 1 m3timber in dollars

    = Steeldensity=

    7.843

    Ast = Temperature and shrinkage area of steel

    = 1 for external panel and 2 for internal panel base on top reinforcement in the panel

    = Coefficient required to determine top reinforcement length and is equal to 0.3 for

    ACI code

    Total Cost Factor TCF and other cost factors are developed to generalize and simplify

    the calculations of slab material cost.

    = ( ) =( ) (9)

    = = ( ) (10)

    1 =

    =

    ( + )( )

    (10 1)

    = =( ) (11)

    And

    = + + = (12)

    1 = + 1 + =

    (12-1)

    Where

    CFC = Cost Factor of Concrete

    CFS = Cost Factor of Steel

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    9/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    297

    CFS1 = Cost Factor of Steel - One Way Slab

    CFT = Cost Factor of Timber

    TCF = Total Cost Factor

    TCF1 = Total Cost Factor One Way Slab

    Fig. 6 The process of estimating Slab cost for a selected M

    Me

    Safety and Reliability:1- Margin of safety M2- Mc (equation 2-b)

    Optimization:1- Flexural formulas2- Constraints3- Slab dimensions and area of steel

    Material quantities per square meter:1- Concrete2- Steel3- Timber

    Cost Analysis:

    1- Concrete cost2- Steel cost3- Formwork cost4- Total cost

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    10/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    298

    RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    Base on the selected margin of safety M for externalbendingmoment Me, the slabswere analyzed and designed optimally to ACI code of design in order to minimize the

    total cost of slabs that includes cost of concrete, cost of steel, and cost of formwork,

    Fig. 6. To relate the safety margins to analysis, design, and cost of reinforced concrete

    slabs, the slabs were subjected to different externalbendingmoment Me withselected range of margins of safety. In order to optimize the slab section, a list of

    constraints (equations 4-4f) that contain the flexural formulas (equations 3-3e) have to

    be satisfied to come up with the most economical slab dimensions. The

    designmomentstrength Mc (equation 2-b) that is selected base on margin of safetyis an input in the optimization function of the slab (equation 4). Once the optimum

    slab thickness and reinforcing steel area are determined, the optimized section design

    moment strength Mo is computed base on ACI flexural equation (equation 3-e) and

    compared with the design moment strength Mc selected base on the margin of safety,

    Table 1.

    Table 1. Safety and optimization of reinforced concrete slabsMe

    kN.mM%

    MckN.m

    Optimized SectionDimensions

    MokN.m

    bmm

    Asmm2

    dmm

    FlexuralACI - Equation

    10 100 20 1000 450 125 20.66720 50 30 540 155 30.78150 20 60 750 225 62.134

    100 40 140 1280 *300 140.335150 33 200 1855 *300 200.24

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    11/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    299

    Fig. 7 The Process of Computing Cost Factors

    START

    i = 1 .. 680 Me Range

    j = 0.01 .. 1.00 M Range

    = External Moment

    = Safety Margin

    = + Design Moment Strength

    Initial Design Parameters (As, d)

    Optimization

    ConstraintsNo

    New As,d

    Material Quantities Steel As, Concrete Ag, Timber AF

    Beam Cost Factors Equations 9-12

    > No

    >

    yes

    yes

    No

    yes

    Next j

    Next i

    END

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    12/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    300

    Areas of Concrete, reinforcing steel and area of timber of the form work AF (equation

    5) are computed based on optimum slab dimensions. The formwork area AF of the

    slab cross section is made of two vertical sides of 20mm thickness and height of slab

    total depth, slab bottom of 50 mm thickness and width equals slab width.

    The total cost of slab material is calculated using equations 6,7 and 8, base on Qatar

    and USA prices respectively of $100,$131 for 1 m3 of ready mix concrete,

    $1070,$1100 for 1 ton of reinforcing steel bars, and $531.$565 for 1 m3

    of timber,

    (11). Total Cost Factor TCF, Cost Factor of concrete CFC, Cost Factor of steel CFS,

    and Cost Factor of Timber CFT, are developed in equations 9 - 12 to generalize and

    simplify the calculation of slab material cost. To determine the cost factors that are to

    be used for estimating the slab material cost, an iterative cost safety procedure of

    estimating the slab material cost base on safety and optimal criteria is applied to

    external bending moment range of 5 kN.m to 680 kN.m as the maximum moment for

    an upper bound of depth equals 300mm and a maximum area of steel base on f`c

    equals 30MPa and fy equals 420Mpa.The margin of safety range of 1% to 100% for

    each moment, Fig. 7. Once the TCF is determined, then the total cost is equal to the

    product of the TCF value that corresponds to the moment Mc and the slab panel area,

    Figs. 8 and 9. The following examples will illustrate the use of the proposed method.

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    13/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    301

    0 200 400 600 800

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    Qatar

    USA

    Design moment strength Mc (kN. m)

    Fig. 8 Total Material Cost of One Way Slab $

    0 200 400 600 800

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    USA

    Qatar

    Design moment strength Mc (kN.m)

    Fig. 9 Total Material Cost of Two Way Slab $

    TCF($/m2

    )

    TCF($/m

    )

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    14/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    302

    Example 1: Simple one way reinforced concrete slab panel of 2 m by 6 meter with

    external bending moment Me magnitude of.

    and margin of safety of 25%,

    Fig. 10. To determine the slab cost, first the safety margin of 25% will require a design

    strength moment Mc equal to.

    (equation 2-b). Second the total cost factor

    TCF is determined base on the Mc magnitude (Fig. 8) and it is equal to 81 and 85 base

    on Qatar and USA prices respectively. Finally, the slab cost is equal to the product of

    TCF and panel area yielding $972 in Qatar and $1020 in USA. The cost of simple one

    way slab with different safety margins is shown in Table 2.

    Simple One way Slab Panel Reinforcement Detailing

    Fig. 10 Simple One Way Slab

    Table 2. Material Cost of Simple One Way Slab

    MekN.m M% MckN.m TotalCostFactorTCF1

    PanelAream2

    Total Cost$

    Qatar USA Qatar USA80 25 100 81 85 12 972 1020

    50 120 85 89 1020 106875 140 87 91 1044 1092

    L 2

    L 1 L 1

    Ast

    As

    h

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    15/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    303

    Example 2: Internal flat plate panel 6m by 8m with 4 external bending moments Me

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    and margin of safety of 20%, Fig.

    11. To determine the slab cost, first the safety margin of 20% requires design moments

    Mc equal to 36 , 27 ,23 , (equation 2-b)respectively. Second the total cost factor TCF is determined base on maximum

    design moment Mc magnitude of

    , and TCF is equal to58 and 60 base on

    Qatar and USA prices respectively, Fig.9. Third the cost factor of steel CFS is

    determined base on the remaining moments magnitudes, Fig.12. Finally, the flat plate

    cost is equal to the product of cost factors and panel area yielding $ 3358.2 and

    $3459.84 in Qatar and USA prices respectively, Table 3.

    Floor Plan Reinforcement Detailing of Internal Panel

    Fig. 11 Flat Plate

    L 1

    L

    InternalPanel

    L 1

    L

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    16/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    304

    0 200 400 600 800

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    USA

    Qatar

    Design moment strength Mc (kN. m)

    Fig. 12 Two way Slab Reinforcing Steel Cost $

    Table 3. Material Cost of Flat PlateMe M% Mc Cost Factor Panel

    Aream2

    CostQatar

    $USA

    SQatar USA30 20 36 *58 60 48 2784 2880

    22.5 20 27 **4.3 4.4 206.4 211.219 20 23 **3.97 4.08 190.56 195.8415 20 18 **3.6 3.7 172.8 178.08

    Total Cost 3353.76 3465.12*TCF**SCF

    CFS($/m2

    )

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    17/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    305

    Example 3: Internal continuous one way slab panel 3m by 7m with 2 external

    bending moments Me

    ,

    and margin of safety of 30%, Fig. 13.To determine the slab cost, first the safety margin of 30% requires design moments Mc

    equal to 39 , 49.4 (equation 2-b) respectively. Second the cost factorsCFC and CFT are determined base on maximum design moment Mc magnitude of

    . , Fig.14. Third the cost factor of steel CFS is determined base on the

    moments magnitudes, Fig.15. Finally, the Internal continuous one way slab cost is

    equal to the product of cost factors and panel area yielding $ 1293.7 and $1363 in

    Qatar and USA prices respectively, Table 4.

    Continuous One way Slab Panels Reinforcement Detailing

    Fig. 13 Continuous One Way Slab

    L 2

    L 1 L 1

    Ast

    As

    h

    L 1 L 1

    0.3 L1 typical

    L 1 L 1

    InternalPanel

    External

    Panel

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    18/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    306

    0 200 400 600 800

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Qatar - CFC

    Qatar - CFTUSA - CFCUSA - CFT

    Design moment strength Mc (kN.m)

    Fig. 14 Cost Factors CFC and CFT

    Table 4. Material Cost of Continuous One Way SlabMe M% Mc Cost Factor Panel

    Aream2

    CostQatar

    $USA

    SQatar USA38 30 49.4 *24.5 25.4 21 514.5 533.4

    **30.4 32.6 638.4 684.6***9.5 9.7 (0.3)21=12.6 119.7 122.2

    30 30 39 ***8.6 8.8 21 180.6 184.8Total Cost 1453.2 1525

    *CFC , **CFT, ***CFS1, = 2

    ($/m2

    )

    Maximum Depth of 300mm

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    19/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    307

    0 200 400 600 800

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Q

    USA

    Design moment strength Mc (kN. m)

    Fig. 15 One Way Slab Reinforcing Steel Cost $

    Example 4: Two-way solid slab internal panel 6m by 8m with 4 external bending

    moments Me

    ,.

    ,

    ,

    and margin of

    safety of 20%, Fig. 16. To determine the slab cost, first the safety margin of 20%

    requires design moments Mc equal to 36 , 27 ,23 ,

    (equation 2-b) respectively. Second the cost factors CFC and CFT are

    determined based on maximum design moment Mc magnitude of

    , Fig.13.

    Third the cost factor of steel CFS is determined based on the moments magnitudes,

    CFS($/m

    )

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    20/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    308

    Fig.12. Finally, the two way solid slab cost is equal to the product of cost factors and

    panel area yielding $3085and $3435in Qatar and USA prices respectively, Table 5.

    It is worth noting that in examples 3 and 4 CFC and CFT in step 2 were computed

    instead of TCF base on maximum moment magnitude, because the maximum moment

    reinforcement is top reinforcement and it had to be computed separately since it does

    not extend over the panel length. Another point of interest is the comparison of the

    cost of flat plate with two-way solid slab on stiff beam that were determined based on

    the same external moments, yielding higher cost for the flat plate than two-way solid

    slab on beams. Even though the calculation showed that the flat plate cost is higher,

    the fact is flat plate is more economical because the cost of two-way solid slab on stiff

    beam exclude the beams cost.

    Floor Plan Reinforcement Detailing of Internal Panel

    Fig. 16 Two Way Solid Slab on Stiff Beams

    L 1

    0.3 L 1

    L

    0.3 LInternalPanel

    L 1

    L

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    21/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    309

    Table 5. Material Cost of Two way Solid SlabMe M% Mc Cost Factor Panel

    Aream2

    CostQatar

    $USA

    SQatar USA30 20 36 *21.2 21.9 48 1017.6 1051.2

    **30.01 32.23 1440 1547.04***5 5.1 (0.3)48=28.8 144 146.88

    22.5 27 ***4.3 4.4 (0.3)48=28.8 123.84 126.7219 23 ***3.9 4.1 48 187.2 196.815 18 ***3.6 3.71 48 172.8 178.08

    Total Cost 3085.44 3246.72*CFC , **CFT, ***CFS, = 2

    CONCLUSIONS

    Flexural analytical model is developed to estimate the cost of slab materials base onselected margin of safety under various design constraints. Margin of safety have adirect impact on the slab optimum design for a desired safety level and consequently ithas a big effect on beam material cost. Total cost factor TCF, cost factor of concreteCFC, Cost Factor of steel CFS, and cost factor of timber CFT are developed andpresented as formulas to approximate material cost estimation of optimized reinforcedconcrete slab sections base on ACI code of design. Cost factors were used to produceslab cost charts that relate design moment strength Mc to the slab material cost for thedesired level of safety. The model could be used base on selected safety margin forother codes of design by modifying equations of flexural and optimization, andchecking the material cost estimates for different types of slabs.

    REFERENCES

    1. Madsen, Krenk, and Lind. (1986). Methods of Structural Safety,Dover Publication, INC., New York.

    2. Park, and Gamble. (2000). Reinforced Concrete Slabs, WileyPublication, INC., New York.

    3. Brown, R. H., (1975). Minimum Cost Selection of One-way SlabThickness Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. 12, pp.2586-2590

    4. American Concrete Institute (ACI).(2008). Building Code andCommentary. ACI-318M-08, Detroit.

    5. Ahmad, F., and Adeli, H. (2005). Optimum cost design ofreinforced concrete slab using neural dynamics model Artificialintelligence, Elsevier, Vol. 18, pp.65-72.

  • 7/28/2019 flexuralsafetycostofoptimizedreinforcedconcreteslabs-121225094124-phpapp01

    22/22

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 3, Number 2, July-December (2012), IAEME

    310

    6. McCormac, and Brown. (2009). Design of Reinforced Concrete,Wiley, 8thedition. New Jersey.

    7. Hassoun, and Al-Manaseer. (2005). Structural Concrete Theory andDesign, Wiley, 3

    rdedition, New Jersey.

    8. MATHCAD (2007).MathSoft Inc., 101 Main Street, Cambridge,Massachusetts, 02142, USA.

    9. Merta, I. T., and Kravanja, S. (2010). Cost Optimum Design ofReinforced Concrete Simply Supported One-Way Slabs , Earth andSpace Conference , ASCE, pp.2670-2678.

    10. Singh, M. S., (1990). Cost Model For Reinforced concrete BeamAnd Slab Structures in Building Journal of ConstructionEnginnering and Management, Vol. 116, pp.54-67.

    11. Waier, P.R., (2010). RSMEANS-Building Construction Cost Data,68

    THAnnual Edition,RSMeans, MA 02364-3008, USA.