February 11, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein 7013 1090 0002 4435 ... · Athens OH CSPMC (Athens) and Dayton OH P&DC (Dayton) Operations were also transferred into Columbus OH P&DC operations

February 11, 2014

Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Mark:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7013 1090 0002 4435 7215

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Chillicothe, Ohio Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR.

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosures

(CA2014-119)

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Facility Name & Type: Chillicothe CSMPC

Street Address: 40 S Walnut St City: Chillicothe

State: OH 50 Facility ZIP Code: 45601

District: Cincinnati Area: Eastern

Finance Number: 381575 Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 456

Miles to Gaining Facility: 54.9 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: David Huelsbeck Senior Plant Manager: Chris H Smith

District Manager: Charles P McCreadie

Facility Name & Type: Columbus OH P&DC Street Address: 2323 Citygate Dr

City: Columbus State: OH

50 Facility ZIP Code: 43218 District: Cincinnati

Area: Eastern Finance Number: 381793

Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 430-433, 437, 438 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Chris H Smith Senior Plant Manager: Chris H Smith

District Manager: Charles P McCreadie

Approval Date: February 23, 2013 Implementation Date: Apr-01-2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR

REDACTED

Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2013: Sep-30-2013 Processing Days per Year: 310

Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,745 EAS Hours per Year: 1,822

Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/

New Facility Start-up Costs Update June 16, 2011

Date & Time this workbook was last saved: I 01-16-2014 12:03

Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations:

Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact:

Joshua D. Colin David E. Williams Bob Roseberry Gary T. Curran I Todd Katkow

PIR Data Entry Page

2

Executive Summary Last Saved January 16, 2014 Date Range of Data:

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City: State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

Savings/Costs

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Staffing Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

Service FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 0/N)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 2 Day)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

Chillicothe CSMPC 40 S Walnut St

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved

4

$0

4

Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

9422% 95.98%

96.19% 97.10%

96.06% 96.59%

90.82%

84.26%

PIR Type: 1st PIR Apr-01-2013 - Sep-30-2013

from Workhour Costs - Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Staffing-Craft

from Service Performance & CSM





PIR Executive Summary

Cal~ulatioo Befenm~es Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $68,708,162 $68,611 ,978 $66,563,817 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs $6,710,504 $6,710,504 $6,756,882 (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $9,504,005 $9,504,005 $8,999,238 Transportation Costs $1,061,574 $1,099,586 $1,157,318

Maintenance Costs $27,120,177 $27,051,966 $27,991,954 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $113,104,423 $112,978,040 $111,469,209

Total One-Time Costs $0 $16,120 $0

Total First Year Costs $113,104,423 $112,994,160 $111,469,209

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,322 1,321 1,346 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 84 88 81

1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP (A~~roved} AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings $2,144,345 $2,048,161 $96,184 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings ($46,379) ($46,379) $0 (less MainUTrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $504,768 $504,768 $0 Transportation Savings ($95,743) ($57,732) ($38,012)

Maintenance Savings ($871 ,778) ($939,988) $68,210 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings $1,635,214 $1,508,831 $126,383

Total One-Time Costs $0 $16,120 ($16,120)

Total First Year Savings $1,635,214 $1,524,951 $110,263

Staffing Craft Position Loss (24) (25) 1

PCES/EAS Position Loss 3 7 (4)

PIR Executive Summary

Summary Narrative Last Saved: January 16, 2014

Losing Facility Name and Type: Chillicothe CSMPC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 456

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Columbus OH P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 430- 433, 437, 438

The Eastern Area, with the assistance of the Cincinnati District, has completed the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Area Mail Processing (AMP) that consolidated destinating mail from the Chillicothe Ohio CSMPC into the Columbus Ohio P&DC. The transfer of destinating mail from the Chillicothe Ohio CSMPC to the Columbus Ohio P&DC began on January 16, 2013 and the implementation was completed on January 23, 2013. The data for the pre-AMP period was July 2010 though June 2011 and included all operations for the Chillicothe Ohio CSMPC and the Columbus Ohio P&DC. The data for the 6-month PIR is April 01, 2013 thru September 30, 2013.

Athens OH CSPMC (Athens) and Dayton OH P&DC (Dayton) Operations were also transferred into Columbus OH P&DC operations. These concurrent activities added workload to Columbus and had a direct impact on the workhours and costs reported in this PIR. The implementation of the Athens AMP was completed by January 09, 2013. Columbus began cancelling Dayton's originating mail on February 02, 2013. The Dayton originating AMP was finalized on February 08, 2013.

Financial Summary:

Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:

Function 1 Workhour Costs

PCESJEAS Workhour Costs

Transportation Costs

Maintenance Costs

Space Savings

Total Annual Cost

Total One-nme Costs

Total First Year Costs

Pre AMP $68,708,162

$6,710,504 $9,504,005 $1,061,574

$27,120,177

$0

$113,104,423

First PIR Vs Pre-AMP

Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Cost Total First Year Savings

$1,635,214 $0 $1,635,214

Proposed 1st PIR $68,611,978 $66,563,817

$6,710,504 $6,756,882 $9,504,005 $8,999,238 $1,099,586 $1 '157,318

$27,051,966 $27,991 ,954 $0

$111,469,209

$16,120 $0

$112,994,160 $111,469,209

First PIR Vs Approved

$1,508,831 $ 16,120 $1,524,951

The first PIR savings is above the proposed first-year savings of $110,263. The consolidation transferred an average daily volume of 180,000 pieces FHP from the Chillicothe CSMPC to the Columbus P&DC. Transportation was realigned to maintain the overnight service commitments between 456 Chillicothe and 430-433, 437-438, 457 Columbus. The PIR includes impacts that can be attributed to the following concurrent activities that occurred after the completion of the AMP package and whose impacts were not reflected in the Pre-AMP base periods for either Athens or Columbus.

• AMP of Athens OH CSMPC implemented on January 16, 2013 with a proposed F1 work hour, Transportation and Maintenance costs in Columbus totaling $148,389.

• AMP of Dayton OH P&DC originating Mail implemented on February 02, 2013 with a proposed F1 work hour, , Transportation and Maintenance costs in Columbus totaling $4,006,158.

Customer Service Considerations:

The EXFC overnight, 2-day and 3-day mail service performance is shown below for the Chillicothe Ohio CSMPC and the Columbus Ohio P&DC.

PIR Summary Narrative

Chillicothe Ohio

95.42% 96.60% 96.40% 96.60% 96.77% 97.41% 96.79% 96.54% 96.65% 95.86% 94.22% 96.19% 9606%

Columbus Ohio

The EXFC overnight, 2-day, and 3-day mail service performance has degraded slightly for Chillicothe since the AMP had taken effect. Columbus EXFC Overnight and 2-day service degraded slightly in 04 Fy 2013. Columbus has put measures in place to improve Overnight and 2-day and 3-day service and will continue to monitor progress.

No change to Retail or BMEU operations.

Transportation Changes:

The approved AMP projected an annual Transportation cost of $38,012. The first PIR projects a cost of $95,743. Highway routes had to be adjusted to deliver the DPS Mail to the units on time. Trips were split to accommodate the additional volume from Columbus.


Staffing Impacts:

The approved AMP proposal identified a reduction of 1 craft employees and an increase of 4 EAS employees. Complement data at the end of the final PIR period shows that complement in Chillicothe has decreased by 1 craft employee over the Pre-Amp number. The Total increase over the proposed craft staffing is 25 employees. This number is addition of craft employees in Columbus to accommodate the increased workload. EAS Staffing in Chillicothe has been reduced by 1 employee. EAS Staffing in Columbus has been reduced by 6 positions vs. the Proposed-Amp number. Columbus has reduced EAS Staffing by 2 positions vs. pre-AMP staffing levels.

Craft 1 33 32

Ma ent 4 3 (1) 84 78

1 Craft= FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals

1 : 17 1 1 : 16 1 : 11

1 8 1 : 36 1 : 31

1 Craft= FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals 2 Craft= F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

25


Maintenance Impacts:

The approved AMP projected an annual Maintenance savings of $68,210 with the consolidation of the destinating operations into the Columbus Ohio P&DC. The CSBCS Machines were removed from the Chillicothe office, and the mail was moved to the Columbus P&DC for processing. The first PIR is projecting an annual cost of$ 939,988. This is due to additional work performed at Twin Rivers drive to facilitate future Mail Consolidation projects, and to remove the CSBCS Machines from Chillicothe. This is due to increased staffing in Maintenance, and in-house work performed at Twin Rivers Drive to accommodate the future mail consolidations (Dayton OH P&DC destinating operations). The work performed was to prepare the building to move the AFSM 100 Machines to Twin Rivers drive to make room for additional DBCS Machines at Citygate.

Space Impacts and One-Time Facility Costs:

The approved AMP projected $16,120 for one-time costs associated with the AMP. The total one-time cost associated with this AMP is $0. This is a savings of $16,120.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: January 16, 2014

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC District: Cincinnati

Gaining Facility: Columbus OH P&DC District: Cincinnati

PIR Type: Implementation Date:

1st PIR 04/01/13

(15) Notes: _____________________ _

Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement 2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM.

Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience) Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)

............... , ............ ;;;;::.:..:. .... :.:.: ........... ; ............. ~ .. : .. :.:.: .. :.: ......... JSatisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending) : ........... + ........... : .. :...:.: .. : .. ::. ....... +········=.::.:.:..:: .......... 1satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO)

I 67.82% 43.45% Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact witt ·~·r~ .... e29oo/:··~r··· s4~6ao/o ......... Likely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

Workhour Costs -Combined Facilities

I Combined Facilities I Last Saved January 16,2014

PIR Type*: ~·:~.: ,~..:.:;,o.:;::;:::;"-;..-;::::-:::::::::::J7.~61f.:>

Type of Distribution Consolidated: ---·--... Q.~~n,a,tin-"'gc_ __ _ Date Range of Data: -~ ...... ~~~~.~~~- to _S!E::~~~-·- .. ·-·-

PIR Workhour Costs Combined Facilities

PI R Workhour Costs ~ Combined Facilities

P!R Workhour Costs ~Combined Facilities

(27)NOTES: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _

~~)!Nm-·,

PI R Workhour Costs - Combined F aci!ities

Workhour Costs -Losing Facility last Saved: January 16, 2014

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC PIR Type·: .~ . .F'.1.~~···::cc::;;;:·;;~~;;ac,z·.;aroirieii

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Apr.01-2013 to Sep...J0--2013

PIR Workhour Costs ¥ Losing

PIR WorKhour Costs- Losing

PIR WorKhour Costs ¥ Losing

P\R WorKhour Costs ~ Losing

PIR Workhour Costs Losing

Workhour Costs ·Gaining Facility Last Saved- January 16, 2014

Gaining Facility: Columbus OH P&DC PIR Type*: ~'::.: :.~ ~ID ~"'"~~· •r ~~~"~"~"'" f"' C,d DID

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: _ .... - ... ~..!:~ .. :201~- to ~.e~g_:?~.~- .... ·~~"""~

PlR Work.hour Costs - Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Gaining

P\R WorKhour Costs Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

(1)

Operation Numbers

PIR Workhour Costs Ga\ning

(27)NOTES: ________________ ·--------·--------------··------------------------··----------------·---------------·--------··-----------------------------------------------------------

PlR Workhour Costs - Ga·!n-mg

[ -- ~--- -<:5ther Workhour Move Analysis -~

PIR Other Workhour Costs


PIR Other Work hour Costs


[ - ----------- --- -~- -~- ----oistribUtionto0t-llerPIRvvork8heetrat>S ---- --- 1



Staffing - Craft Last Saved: January 16, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 09/24/13

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC Finance#: 381575

Craft Positions

Craft Positions

~-----------~------------~ I (23) I (24) I ! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Proposed ! Total Craft Position Loss:L ____ !~~----j _____ (2_:!,_ ____ j

(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing -Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC Data Extraction Date: 9/24/2013

PCES/EAS Positions

Position Title

Last Saved: January 16, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Finance# .;3:.:8..:.15:::;7:..:5~----

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Columbus OH P&DC Finance # .::3.:::8.:.17:..:9:.:3:.._ ___ _ Data Extraction Date: 9124/2013

PCES/EAS Positions On-Rolls

r, .. , .. ,_., .. , ........... ,-r, .. , ........ ,_., .. , __ ~--·--·--·--·--·--·--~ I Total PCES/EAS' <37

> ' <38

) '

I Position Lossl 3 I 7 j ~·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~·-·-·-·-·-·---J-·-----·-----~ (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Transportation - PVS Last Saved: January 16, 2014

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC Finance Number: -=3-=8...:.1.:..57'-'5=--------

(4) l (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st

1st PIR I PIR vs Pre PIR vs

(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: ___ "-'-'--'-'----' (This number added to the Executive Summary

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2013 --to Sep-30-2013

Gaining Facility: Columbus OH P&DC Finance Number: 381793 ------------

(8) l (9) l (10) Variance 1st Variance 1st

PIR PIR vs Pre PIR vs

(12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings=-------'-'----'----"-(This number added to the Executive Summary)

(13)Nooos: __________________________________________________________ _

PIR Transportation PVS

(1)

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Data of HCR Data File:

(3) (4)

1st PIR Route#

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: January 16, 2014

(6) (7)

1st PIR Annual Cost

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

(9) (10)

1st PIR

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Notes:

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

Gaining Facility: Columbus OH P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date of HCR Data File:

(1)

Route#

(3)

Proposed Annual

(4)

1st PIR Annual

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: January 16, 2014

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

(6)

Proposed Annual Cost

(7)

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CETforOGP:

CT for Outbound Dock:

(9)

Proposed Annual

------

(10)

1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile

PIR Transportation HCR -Gaining

Notes:

(11) (12) Change Analysis

1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

Losing Gaining

(13) 1 (14) 1st PIR vs Pre

AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed

$0 $114.449

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

$152,461

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

Total Transportation

HCR PVS

(15)

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): $95,743 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16)

1st PIR vs Proposed

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

Data Extraction Date: -----Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC

(10) Notes:

MPE Inventory Last Saved: January 16, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2013 --to-- Sep-30-2013


(5) (6)

1st PIR

(7) Proposed Relocation

Costs

(8 1st PIR

Relocation Costs

$0 I $0

Space Evaluation and Other Costs

(9)

Variance in Costs

PIR MPE Inventory

I LDC 36

Maintenance Last Saved January 16, 2014


Mail Processing $

Egui(!ment

Building Equipment $

Building Services $ (Custodial CleanmgJ_

·~

Maintenance Stockroom $ and Supplies

Grand Total

$

$

$

$

$

(2) (3) (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st

Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre PIRto Costs Costs AMP Proposed

0 $ 0 0 $ 0

0 $ 70,231 1,369 $ 70,231

141,573 $ 147,462 5.889 $ 5,889

0 $ 0 0 $ 0

0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

141,573 $ 217,692 'II>•' 7,258 $ 76,119

25,630

0

167,203

(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

LDC 36

LDC 37

LDC 38

LDC 39

I LDC 93

PIR Type*:_:1..:.st:..:P_:I:_:R _____ _

Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2013 : Sep-30-2013


(7) (8) (9) Variance 1st

Workhour Activity Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre Costs Costs AMP

$ 12,254,802 $ 13,285,213 1,030,411 $

Buildina Eauioment $ $ 3,144,241 $ 3,121,723

t)UIIUIII!:J ..;:)~IV 1\;.t;:::J $ (Custodial Cleaning)

5,515,420 $ 5,558,467 $ 43,047 $

Maintenance Operations - $ 1,242,269 $ 1,140,158

---···-···_::-··:-·:-- $ ':SS$J1,11!"' $ 355,118 $ 798,763 443,645 $

$ 22,511,850 $ 23,904,324 1,392,474 $

PartS and Supplies

Maintenance Stockroom $ 4,369,956 $ 4,372,913

0

Grand Total $ 26,884,763

$871,778 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(10) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre Proposed

1,030,411

43,047

443,645

1,392,474

(13)Nores: ______________________________________________________________________ ~===========================================

"'Data in PIR columns is annualized for First P!R

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: January 16, 2014

Losing Facility : Chillicothe CSMPC PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2013 --to Sep-30-2013

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

DMM L001

X DMM L002

DMM L003

DMM L004

X DMM L005

DMM L006

DMM L007

DMM L008

DMM L009

DMM L010

DMM L011

DMM L201

DMM L601

DMM L602

DMM L603

DMM L604

DMM L605

DMM L606

DMM L607

DMM L801

(2)

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

<3> Yes

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS

Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival 0 en Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count %

Aug '13 Losing Facility 456 Chillicothe

Sept '13 Losing Facility 456 Chillicothe

Aug '13 Gaining Facility 430 Columbus 813 214 26.32% 228 28.04% 0 0.00%

Sept '13 Gaining Facility 430 Columbus 842 260 30.88% 242 28.74% 0 0.00%

Count

598

582

Closed %

73.55%

69.12%

(5lNotes: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------================

Unschd 1 Count

52

85

PIR Distribution Changes

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC 5-Digit ZIP Code: 45601

Data Extraction Date: -=o~9/"=275t""'173 _____ _

1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m. Number picked up after 5 p.m.

Total Number of Collection Points

Customer Service Issues Last Saved January 16, 2014

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"?

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP?

4. Delivery Performance Report

% Carriers returning after 1700

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes

8. Notes:


9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? I --- --]

PIR Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved January 16, 2014

Losing Facility: Chillicothe CSMPC Date: ________ _

1. Affected Facility

2. One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs: __ ...:::;$0::,_ __ $0 $0

3. Savings Information

Space Savings ($): __ ..;$;;.;0;.._ __

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.

5. Notes:

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs (from above)

Total One-Time Costs

$16,120

$16,120

(These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)

$0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

($16, 120)

$0

$0 ($16, 120) PlR costs carried fo!Ward to Executive Summary)


Pre-AMP: FY 2011 Range of Report


PIR: FY 2013

1st PIR Cost per 1 ,000 Images

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

Documents

February 11, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein 7013 1090 0002 4435 ... · Athens OH CSPMC (Athens) and Dayton OH P&DC (Dayton) Operations were also transferred into Columbus OH P&DC operations