36
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski, Elise Larsen, Matthew Walker Miller, Breanne Robertson, Karl Schmitt, Artesha Taylor Sharma Co-Investigators: Spencer Benson, Sabrina Kramer, Alexis Williams Presenter: Karl Schmitt – University of Maryland, College Park STUDENT EXPECTATIONS FROM CS AND OTHER STEM COURSE

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM

Lilly Graduate Fellows:Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski, Elise Larsen, Matthew Walker Miller, Breanne Robertson, Karl Schmitt, Artesha Taylor Sharma

Co-Investigators: Spencer Benson, Sabrina Kramer, Alexis Williams

Presenter: Karl Schmitt – University of Maryland, College Park

STUDENT EXPECTATIONS FROM CS AND OTHER STEM COURSE

Page 2: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

How To Vote via Texting

1. Standard texting rates only (worst case US $0.20)2. We have no access to your phone number3. Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling do

TIPS

EXAMPLE

Page 4: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Motivation

• Student expectations for a course?• Teaching techniques?• Technologies and tools?• Different Assessments?

• Student expectations for instructors?• Types of Communication?

Page 5: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Motivation II

• Do these student expectations match faculty’s impressions?

• How can we identify similarities and discrepancies?

• How do we address these?

Page 6: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Outline• Motivation

• Related Work• Tool Description• Survey Results- For CS• (Some more general results)

• Conclusions• Q&A

Page 7: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

What Others Say…

• Sanders, et al.• Planning for 4-year curriculum/course of study• Did not compare with faculty perceptions of student

expectations (gap analysis)

• Trudeau & Barnes• Focused on instructor traits

• Umbach & Wawrzynski• Showed positive correlation with many of the techniques

our survey addressed and student engagement

Page 8: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

A Simple, Deployable ToolTool Requirements:

• Components of interest• Learning activities• Learning assessments• Technology• Instructor communication

• Broad applicability• Appropriate length• Sufficiently informative• Flexibility

Page 9: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Survey Summary

•Two Primary Questions:• Which of these components do you expect to be used in this course?

• Rank the three most important components for your learning in this course

These were asked about over 20 different components

Page 10: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Survey Summary (details)Categories Questions Selections Available

1) Technology Which of the following do you expect in this course?

Clickers PowerPoint  E-Textbooks Social Media  Rank the three most important

components in this course for your learning.

Learning Management Systems

2) Learning Activities Which of the following do you expect in this course?

Demonstrations Chalkboard/WhiteboardIn-Class Discussion Non-Textbook readings

  Rank the three most important components in this course for your

learning.

Textbooks Small Discussion Groups  Study Guides

3) Learning Assessments

Which of the following do you expect in this course?

Group Projects Individual ProjectsEssay-Based Exams Multiple Choice Exams

  Rank the three most important components in this course for your

learning.

Written Papers Homework  Class Participation Points

4)Instructor Interaction Which of the following do you expect from the instructor of this course? Interact with Students

Be Accessible outside office hours

Know students' names Hold office hours    Other None of the above

5) Timeliness of Actions by the Instructor

How soon do you expect your instructor to:Respond to emails or phone-calls, post grades, return assignments, be available to meet

Immediately Within 24 horusWithin 2 Days Within a week

Never N/AOne free response question:

What misconceptions do you think faculty have about students?

Page 11: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Survey Results

Page 12: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

29%

20%28%

23%Class Distri-

bution

Freshman Sophmore

Junior Senior

Participation Summary

27 Instructors; 25 courses 816 undergraduate

students enrolled in STEM courses

73%

27%Major Dis-tribution

STEM Non-STEM

Computer Science Breakdown:o Total: 57 Studentso 200-Level : 42o 400-Level : 15

Page 13: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Think, Pair, Share, Predict - Results• Learning Activities

• Classroom Discussion, Readings, Chalk-/White-Boards, Study Guides, Demonstrations

• Learning Assessments• Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation

• Technology• PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media

• Instructor• Office Hours, Classroom, Non-Office Hours, Naming,

Answering Emails and Phone-calls, Assignment return, Grade posting

Pick the three with the most difference

Page 15: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Comparison of CS to Aggregate STEM

Page 16: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

A deeper look:

200- Level Courses

• Computer Science – 42• Chemistry (2 courses) – 154• Biology – 167

400- Level Courses

• Computer Science – 15• Biology – 106• Bio-Chemistry – 69

Computer Science vs. Biology & (Bio-)Chemistry

28%

8%56%

8%

400-Level Course Breakdown

BCHM463 (Bio-Chemistry)

BCHM464 (Bio-Chemistry)

BSCI 440 (Biology)

CMSC 433 (Computer Science)

46%

42%

12%

200- Level Course Breakdown

BSCI 223 (Biology)

CHEM 232/27* (Chemistry)

CMSC 216 (Computer Science)

Page 18: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

200- Level Courses

46%

42%

12%

200- Level Course Breakdown

BSCI 223 (Biology)CHEM 232/27* (Chemistry)CMSC 216 (Computer Science)

Page 20: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

400- Level Courses

28%

8%56%

8%400-Level Course Breakdown

BCHM463 (Bio-Chemistry)

BCHM464 (Bio-Chemistry)

BSCI 440 (Biology)

CMSC 433 (Computer Science)

Page 21: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Open Response Question:

What misconceptions do you think faculty have about students?

Page 22: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions

• What themes do you think were voiced in their responses?

Page 23: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions

• We identified the following themes in student responses:

•Dominate Themes (>100):-Student time commitments-Student effort, attitude

• Secondary Themes (~40):- Effectiveness of pedagogy- Pace and student

comprehension• Tertiary Themes (<30):

- Students goals and grades - Teaching tools- Prerequisites - Student-instructor

communication- Major or class specific comments - Other- Cheating - No Misconceptions

Page 24: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions

Student time commitments (130 responses)

“I think professors frequently underestimate the average workload of a full-time student”

“[Some faculty believe] That we are only in THEIR class and don't take any other time-consuming courses or have jobs “

“They forget not all the students are traditional college students some work a lot and have responsibilities beyond school”

Page 25: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsStudent effort & attitude (145 responses)

“[Faculty believe] That students are lazy and try to take the easy way out whenever possible”

“[Faculty believe] That our grades on exams directly correlate to how we feel about the course material..i.e. a bad exam grade means the student does not care”

“[Faculty believe] That if they don't show up to office hours/review sessions then they do not care about their grades”

“[Faculty believe] That we only want to get a good grade and typically aren't very interested in learning. Or that we should know everything we are told to learn, even when that includes minor details that aren't emphasized in lecture”

Page 26: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty MisconceptionsPedagogy (49 responses)

Faculty believe “That students prefer an excessive amount of "easy" questions on exams in comparison to a shorter amount of more difficult questions. “

“When teaching a large class, it is easy to overlook the fact that there are individuals in your class with individual needs. Also, I feel that chemistry professors in particular have trouble explaining concepts to students. They assume that it makes sense to the students because it makes sense to them.”

Faculty believe “That PowerPoints are an effective teaching method. They are good for presentation of material, not retention. A presenter is not synonymous with a teacher.”

Page 27: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Student Opinions of Faculty Misconceptions

Many students touched on several themes:

“[Faculty believe] That we don't want to learn -- if we show up to class, we are there to learn -- it is not hard to "skip" a class. In that vein, if we are in class, please -- do not baby us, do not mock us for asking questions, and do not waste your time or ours going into information that is irrelevant. Good lectures are key to a good class, whether or not the course material is interesting.”

“I think they think that if we are using our lap tops we are on facebook but that is not always true. I also think they think we don't do the reading but in reality many people do, its just that there is so much reading that it might take a few reminders of which reading we are talking about before the faculty should jump to the conclusion that no body did the reading.”

Page 28: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Faculty Feedback

“I thought this survey was great at getting a cross section of what my students expected from the class. Plus, we are trying some new formats for the course, and we want to see how the student body changes. I was surprised at some the expectations, but the complaint of the majority: this class is too much work is wrong, in my opinion.”

Page 29: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Conclusions• Students and instructors do not always agree on expectations in the classroom.

• Many students feel that instructors adopt a condescending attitude and underestimate their abilities.

• This tool provides an early opportunity for instructors and students to communicate and to improve learning.Tool Can be found at:

http://www.cte.umd.edu/Resource/Surveys/

Page 30: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Reflection

• Which student expectations do not match your current teaching style?

• What curriculum changes might you make based on this information?

• Are there questions specific to your course or to your discipline that you would want to add?

Page 31: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Thank You

• UMCP Center for Teaching Excellence• Spencer Benson, Sabrina Kramer, Alexis Williams

• Instructors and students who participated in the surveys

• Faculty who distributed the student survey

Page 32: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Some additional Results

Page 33: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

•Learning Assessment• Exam types, Projects, Papers, Homework, Class Participation

Additional Comparisons:

Page 34: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Learning Assessment (by Class)

Multiple Choice Exams

Essay-Based Exams

Individual Projects

Group Projects

Written Papers

Homework Class Par-ticipation

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior

Spring 2012

Seniors expect more sophisticated learning assessment components, such as essay-based exams, group projects, and written papers

Page 35: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

•Technology• PowerPoint, ELMS, e-Texts, Clickers, Social Media

Additional Comparisons:

Page 36: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT EXPECTATIONS IN THE CLASSROOM Lilly Graduate Fellows: Andrea Andrew, Abdel-Hameed Badawy, Mara Dougherty, Katie Marie Hrapczynski,

Technology (by Class)

Powerpoint Learning Management

System

e-Textbooks Social Media Clickers0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior

Spring 2012

Fewer freshmen expect PowerPoint compared to other students

Students tend not to expect e-textbooks and social media in STEM courses