14
1 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis August 26, 2008 Susan Lee & Carl Linvill Aspen Environmental Group

33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis. August 26, 2008 Susan Lee & Carl Linvill Aspen Environmental Group. Purpose: 33% RPS Implementation Challenges Will Be Examined And Solutions Proposed. Resource planning in the regulatory arena often fails to assess implementation challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

1

33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

August 26, 2008

Susan Lee & Carl Linvill

Aspen Environmental Group

Page 2: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

2

Purpose: 33% RPS ImplementationChallenges Will Be Examined And Solutions Proposed Resource planning in the regulatory arena often fails to

assess implementation challenges

Environmental Review, Supply Chain Adequacy, and Contracting and Regulatory Issues each have implementation consequences

The 33% RPS examples are an opportunity to present the Commission with the challenges and propose potential solutions

Page 3: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

3

Environmental Issues That Drive Timelines – Some Examples Examples of Environmental or Permitting Concerns

DPV2 Transmission Line West of Devers segment (tribal land) Arizona segment (another state’s approval required)

Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Line Legal and permitting risk of routing options through

Anza-Borrego Desert State Park vs. National Forest land

Ivanpah BrightSource Solar Thermal CEC and BLM coordination required to meet both

agencies’ requirements takes additional time

Page 4: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

4

Environmental Issues Considered at Three Points – Initial Buildout

Page 5: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

5

Environmental Screen Will Affect Initial Buildout RETI metrics by CREZ offer values that can

influence initial buildout choices RETI metrics include:

Footprint within CREZ and transmission ROW Category 1 and Category 2 lands Significant species & wildlife corridors

Page 6: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

6

Environmental Issues Considered at Three Points – Final Buildout

Page 7: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

7

Implementation Screen Will Support Final Buildout Use RETI as a foundation

Support RETI with supplemental qualitative information, e.g. –

Cumulative impacts (agricultural land, specific habitat types, cultural resources)

Land uses adjacent to transmission corridors requiring expansion

Page 8: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

8

Environmental Issues Considered at Three Points – Implementation Analysis

Page 9: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

9

Environmental Issues Drive Implementation Timelines Use team experience to identify potential significant

implementation challenges in the environmental process

Approval timelines by key agencies: CPUC (transmission), BLM and CEC (solar)

Effects of multiple concurrent proceedings on agency timing and workload

Availability of mitigation lands for specific habitat types

Solar PEIS scoping comments offer insight into major concerns and permitting challenges

Challenges arising in ongoing CEC and CEC/BLM proceedings (Ivanpah BrightSource, Carrizo Ausra, Stirling Solar Two)

Page 10: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

10

Implementation Challenges Arise From Other Sources As Well Supply Chain Challenges

Contracting and Regulatory Challenges

Others?

Page 11: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

11

Supply Chain Issues Introduce Implementation Challenges

Manufacturing capacity of renewable technologies will require expansion

Manufacturing capacity for major transmission construction may be limited

Some transmission system equipment needs to be specifically ordered with long lead time

Delays in delivery of capital in rapid expansion phases is common

Page 12: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

12

Contracting and Regulatory Issues Introduce Challenges

The chicken and egg problem of T and G contracting, financing and construction

High contract failure rate creates planning difficulties

LTPP determination of need and other regulatory changes may increase long term contracting certainty

Page 13: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

13

Other Implementation Issues?

Page 14: 33% RPS Implementation and Barrier Analysis

14

Contact Information:

Susan Lee [email protected]

415.955.4775

Carl Linvill [email protected]

916.379.0350