1 Gannett Fleming · 2019-12-03 · 7 ' 1 Gannett Fleming I ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Suite 200 • East Quadrangle Village of Cross Keys Baltimore, MD 21210

7' 1 Gannett Fleming

I ENGINEERS AND PLANNERSLETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Suite 200 •East QuadrangleVillage of Cross KeysBaltimore, MD 21210Tel: (410) 433-8832FAX: (410)433-6520

RE

TO

ATTN:

DATE 96

WE ARE SENDING YOUZ Shop drawingsG Copy of letter

COPIES

/

DATE

Ah/ftNO,

—— —

[Âttached G Under separate cover via the fnllnuuinrj items-G Prints G Plans Q Samples G SpecificationsG Change order d

DESCRIPTION

/ o i ^ i c**. ?*&, L> ££* -&.fJ2y c oJyt fJ ^ -* *j vt"%iYS&i*.j LP O 6- -J £«J- T tr.ju**- #-/£•££ '9 6 / ~>ffy.(V) Sl+t*st>(j*jfaS >C<J-t£&L- C&lsptX )/-

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:

Z For approval Z Approved as submitted G Resubmit _______'._____ copies for approvalZ For your use G Approved as noted . Q Submit ____________ copies for distributionG As requested G Returned for corrections G Return ________________ corrected printsZ For review and comment G ____________________________________________________Z FOR BIDS DUE ______;_____ 19 ____ G PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US

REMARKS ___________________:___________________________________________

COPY TO ^L^6_______________ GANNETT FLEMING, INC.

FILE: Y-ff SIGNED _

If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

A R 3 2 I O U R

U.S. ERA Region IIIOffice of Analytical Services

and Quality AssuranceAnnapolis, Maryland

ANALYTICAL REPORT *• J2 •*

KEYSTONE SANITATION LF OU-2SUPERFUND REMOVAL/REMEDIAL

Account # 96 T 03 N TFA 03L9CO02Lab Request # REQ96170

August 7, 1996

U.S. EPA Region IIIOffice of Analytical Services

and Quality Assurance- Annapolis, Maryland

• , • . •' . ; ; ' -•• " ' ' ';; '. . August 1, 1996

ANALYTICAL RESULTS: KEYSTONE SANITATION LP OU-2 [REQ96170]

Dear Christopher Corbett, .'

Enclosed is our analytical report for the above case. It is organized intoseveral sections: Analytical Request and Sample Descriptions, Organic,Inorganic, and Microbiological Results. All data were reviewed,by a peer- and alaboratory manager.- . - " ' ' . . . ' * 1 ' , •

Analytical Request and Sample Descriptions: (General). Each laboratory assigned,number, station, description, matrix, sample dateand locational data is reported. A table summarizes the tests assigned to

. each sample. A glossary and qualifier code definition is provided.Inorganic Results: .

For requests assigned inorganic tests, results are grouped by servicegroup, e.g.. Metals. Sample results ara reported; non-detects are providedwith the actual quantitation limit. Method description and quality controlprotocols are described in analyst narratives.

Organic Results: ~ ,. . .For the requested organic tests, results are grouped by service group,'e.g.. Volatile Organic Compounds. Only detected analytes are reported. 'Nominal Quantitation Limit (NQL) tables.are provided for each servicegroup. Specific information, for the calculation of Actual QuantitationLimits (AQL) achieved for a given sample is included. Quality controlvalues are provided in summary tables with acceptance criteria. Methoddescription and quality dbntrol protocols are described in analyst ..narratives. • , / • '

Microbiological Results: .For requests assigned microbiological tests, sample results and qualitycontrol values are incorporated into a single table. Method descriptionand quality control protocols are described in analyst narratives.

. ' ' - . • \ 'If you have any questions we may be reached at 410-573-2SOO.

Approval for Release: '

cc: Sydney Curran (NUS (HALLIBURTON))

AR32I050

otn

cs NITREM

TO

O

1 < zST > 2 O ^^•••' k . • * ^ ^

z£ ^c- 5£- ZA

> r-Y

£ 9 H. ^ ••— a i.._.. ^ ^Q , y f"" ^ ^-A H m -n I .J

SQm ;£DC

§ ?* O!

.SOffice of

andAnn Ulyttys, Regtica

Suryl

§3 =8'zr"

AR32 I 05 I

I.- w- -^.^.ohflfciflbfltnbnfcakntMfc3 r* 3 3

3333333333333333.33^33333233?3?233223232232

a a 5 3 * a s a s s s

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!I£

*!•13

I

AR32I052

d OH-

B4en 5j" 08

c z»s

1a aatr tt

Ii?. " ' ' ''°R w* s

3o

5,, .?',o.10 Htw ti

»tI» . -• n

no

a0 H>(fl O9 3

MO•J W U0^ H

SISfff-f

iililll!

^ i•• M M »• M !•*• M*ssssssli s

HOs? oM a.

3

If I-•-•••-•. I'D M . J^JQ

oI

. H6.. *1o RHoon

IB )ft ff

t«too10

W

u> itfrt* 51",H OHO«J U) (0OS5 H>

AR32I053

3•5r»

I

AR32I05U

SLF

ru

12*S

0 :rorr wH-W

«:«:

W (O

A B 32 I 0.5 5

MlHIM-

??Ss2f&3S3 MH_ 5 d> H

H-O9n

»>oo•9c

•Sgrr tt09a•o tt

9 M-(Q

HO«J U> rt02 U

Ow58o(O 1

AR32 I 056

ittun -I"'**!! rljjj [;|i»ti|. ,t

t"!'tiRi[ ;:|.|1| fitirfffiiiHf«-"•<• -iaf r ||i[r

Jllll rrfir?|: ;,;:•: /{i . [HrS jl

" »«• -!it|f i tf ;f|f'[ [fB±&?! El- IE*5 f- .Ms * - • -B 19 i

o'f

i

AR321057

i! in•»*

:*s

_ _Li »

n* 0 «* a*» •• —• • m-iifi-Hif iii!1

* * - i«•» 9 ". . rt« •

S B

I

p| n ^

£ j-

£' f .

P . P ' ^-* F l-"M X> SI C Kl

PPPP? P PP- Mf :'Effl- PM i w i w ^ ^ a i MM |^ ^1 •' — ••.•» t. a* «. a • ,t fc • • • • m- • m N

£H-

£ 8H-84'RI wi

CO

Ii gs

M 2JHIH-OIS?

01 0 -»^ ' to* 1*^ f wc* fl»seg?nk _ • •- ^ , »-

°4f-

£°i?s 5.S&gg^H0-0 »1 Hflia

(Da

.o a•92COCT ft

COfl>

m rtt» H-(Q

(ftHO-4 U

sO

AR32I058

n =n; ri•EH!'-'

M *• M W

p «

\)' ' r ' V6jfEii-

3COV

oHiHiI*Sa"»

&i*»-« : • (L

O

CO•* •• 0

QM 10 itf ftn c* • P M-D (Q OU>H O KCi •• ••MO*J u> to o055 KM

O

to9o

AR32I059

I W*

HfffH'lIll iffs?ia 5? ata/

M Wt. • CB

fea

ap-"SS^Ko.gSH

eo

M .

=*=»

AR32I060

\J

1K

ff ? ff•• •• ••

£ £ isP—

E E |||-

E E |p-

E E H- •

« ? • .. 5 ' ' B "i S W HH

(^ • - - m m . g's -; . v" fci,

E E

B R

sE £

F ».

£ £

e• * • ' • • •— : M *-o o• •M *-c. ' a

w

E P

£ P E

E P

£ >'••;:,- £ P ' £• • " • ' . • B

11*•

L

to 3 ft

s ° I."£ E ''81-" 'H- 152'S E ; P E . MB- K S ' o SS . £ §

nj.*a3S= 4sa€3co

«§5

?? oHiMl

|gc&0Jo£§»•

0 g >K•Fsfs-"45 r«"•IT

" I ar« eg KMs IJss|B?-h H

I I;rsIIit rr

H-OOCD

tooi u> »d ftI Oi p> H-

CQ "

Out«(08

AR32I06I

y C| ;

*rf

5*4 «f ••» - « « » n — -*OQQQi t • on-9 IS'T^'^X'iii

iilvHlflSSIf?f3? i' * : s. 3S3 < Z < J »:

r» -<

» =>1I

*fa I_...!.'

s

p p «•M Ul «.n c_

? ? P PMM > Oi

SO O O -»• • •-» •* Mb

AR32 I 062

E £

&&8a1*0*He"4'O 5 f>MHJLEj »dH-PS >° ft H- •?•< »« «*&g-ts-j.45 H 8IU t? rn MI s H

H

O

A.R32I063

939332ii i§* ' * * * * 1H5 * *H 4* •* •* •* ttli~ VM Ul

r? P .-*? P j> Iggji p p

2 a * ss s

a:

01 Ul » Ok > CK >H • Oi *•M » 5 JQ -S Ql :"§ -3 S

ui o ui (x 01 'M —. .*• 5 ui

vn yi ui wi ui uiui wi ui ui :14* <a y> :•M M C» - i:S?I J3 3

JK Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul0* O Ô O *O Ul

S3

v ?3 .wsgi . | ;2 H «» —— ^ KW9K • w- w \ wr « iv XWMf - V M0»« H C! ' I «jJ D ..—. U| i

ast . *- r..N a a a V

|^ .3 si*:. --*•»» *i

i « t • i •»js -+ Zt Z*S o *» o Ob^ w **

33

So <q :341 «» ui » ui « o. | ' 0» -O-« S x"^ . Ul S» 5 O S M «$5 S * :

!«**.« 8

ui m Ok 0 o> uig» o 5 S ui >o

9 •O iil Ul Ul O> Ul 0> Q>3 0* "« IM *4 » O> M 5 :

a a a 2

33

3 3.H S33 Si3 all 335

si

B

So

M HIHiH-

a » M^•£fs

Hp waH 9 Ho,

g

H0ft

COsto »d tt»03 OOP

HO•J W WOOS! H »

if S4 J3: 1wto8oM

A ft 32 I 06 «*

Bftf 1 .»&&& vV!Ji i' i H f" $• 3. 4. •" *" ;Iviil v?f?ris8 s-

O *• Wl

S £

11

ggIRK &&'&&« 85

2 g 8 s g a a » g @ fc g

sssi! gggsssll g§

BKKBVK.B 85

SSI

ft5 p.fi LjM K .

OB

Z M

s- o^r

O *• U«

S SS

825!

£

S*

£ g

ino

•^ . —- **O HiK-OO .1

S 2 I r s»M*M 1C K "~*

S£

CO

aB»

I=io

o wO Hi •

tJ Wefip

»

0)» p&80 -88

w to "d rrW e» (OH-IO (0 Ov>H , ft pCl •• .«•MO*J w tfl O

' ' . ' - «o oa o

oKI

AR32I065

a fe*5 -» §

= h a

9*

33il BSS2

o * v» oi ui yj 01 yiJK S S«S oi — * w o» M

a

AR32I066

ri

ID .H

Iim

se as si e 5i^jsasi-

a

O

u< ca r- — -•

2*2 se b'fr s.

2 asi s s s s § ? g e

s SII § B s § 1111 s s §1 s i•"•§ S S191w K S CD CD CD ca CD

"* •* * ••* * 8Mt:S HJ Irt » Ul Iji Ut bf 'IU JS- 4 > -i* <jj <*- w *. w - ip bo S ft S G 5S B K B.S K 2 ;

Si<••

OS M

to

n p?

H0 SS'

o10 Hs

Hi

H

-

O

W Jd {>Q(J Q-.00

Ct ft

£ * <fc to«d ft

J'i- ?°w noH O

owt*tooOo10

o

AR32I067

((

• at4?

I.I9

. , .iti~ I' 1*

/f

3oHiHi

tn

Sw a«• FJ•" HS3 W H_ 5 » HO* 7v H Hi

m H.oM • °

8-ooo

4ts 4ts CO '••• '• »t (0

» «> m rrM 01 p H*O (Q Ou> HI op01 •• ••HO-4 W MO

O

t*u>so iAR32I068

OL ft V Si •#• & & a^v.1 ••CS*iff.* ? r sr

/' • I -" I I "I I "I IX^ - I V I I I |

ass sss

••

s •*

£ £i

*• Ul O.

C6

AR32I069

D»

QH»

to

g?l§

O ~ M I*W Hi

nw

" S»8ft".T n &> R

P g Ho n Mo 5aIQ

QD

Mr *«

•§8§Prr ct

ca•••(•• • • Q

Q» vo >d rrL_4 -_. > jJT JW O» (B JJ»to to o\o 1-3 0 pH O-j w o o0« MS

O

10

o•oto

•*' . • '.>»». ' " '••? .- •• '**£ . . . . _ . . - - * » • «•' '':s . ' ' ' - . . ' . A 8 ' ' .».

O. CO

w

H Hffl

o

H-O

Q

AR32I070

4c

1

WM MlHi

Q

Iat*

2

a1 °H <D

CQ "&

O O•§8o 2n 5rt rt

COotr

,81?

«**HO

SI <o *d crn <n o H-°- $8

0wt«80

I * flflP **

o s * 1 •? * 9 * I %

^ I 1 ' - 'I -11 "*•^ . B^ • • •

H

O

e §

*

AR32I07I

to

oH»

O Hh H

a °H fD^ o

on

II .o- CT*«= CO••-.•• A

^ ' Oa «> w «•n c» p> H-O (00«>H o tJO) •• ••HO•J LJ O O

OO)t<toOOOto

S 5 2si 3-~ 3- 9

si1!1 i;• ;

••-•.T'.JK'K/."-.-.

. i»s-

5i« - .M 01O

ra

£S£ oK> Hi

Hi

0O

ss0.8 j| H

H«. OO

" Ia o•9 o§8Q PCT ft

01ffl

S0 , ^ 2*o H at)ot •• ••HO^4W OO.

0U>t«

8

AR32I072

Central Regional Laboratory • Region HIVolatile Organlcs Analysis

Nominal Quantitatton Limits (NQL) .Wafer "Og/L NPTC ••Non-I'riorky PoUntH* Target Cumiuuul

Actual Quandtation Limit = (NQLFactor) X NQL

75-7147447-375-01-47443-975-00-3750-475-35-475-15467-64-175-09-2156-60-575-34-3108-05-4590-20-7156-59-478-93-374-97-565-66-371-55-656-23-5563-58-671-43-2107-06-279-01-678-87-57445-375-27-4110-754

10061-01-6108-10-110843-3

10061-01-579-00-5127-18-4

DichlorodifluoromethaneChloromemaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethineChloroethane •Tiichlorofluoromeffaane1,1-DichloroemeneCubon Disulfide NPTCAcetone • . NPTCMetbylene Chloridetnns-l,2-I>ichloroemene1,1-DichloroemaneVinylAcetue NPTC2,2-Dichloropropane'cis-l,2-Dichloroeihene NPTC2-Butanone NPTCBromochloromeinane ' NPTCChloiofonn1,1,1-TtfchloroeihaneCtitwn Tetnchloridel.l-Dichloro-l-propeneBenzene1 -DichloroethaneTrichloiDcthenc1,2-Diddoropiopine

Bromodichloiomefhine2-CUon>esiyIvi&yletner

Toluenecb-l,3-Dichloropiopene1,1.2-TrichloroetnaneTenachJoroeihene

NPTC

trans-l -Dictloropropene NPTC44tIetbyI-2-penOnone NPTC

1

142-28-9591-78-6124-48-1106-93-4108-90-7£30-204100-41-4108-38-3106-42-395-47-6100-42-575-25-29842410846-179-34-596-18-410345-195-494106-43-4108-67498-06-693-63-6135-984541-73-1106-46-79947-695-50-1104-51496-12412042-191-20-387-68-387-61-6

14-Pichloiupi opine NPTC2-Hexaujone 'NPTC

1.24>ibromoetliane(EDB) NPTCChlonbenzeael.l.l -Tetnchlonetbane NPTC

m-Xyfene NPTCp-Xykne .NPTCo-Xykne NPTCSiyicne NPTCBroniofonnIsopropylbenreng NPTCBromobenzrae NPTC1.1.2 -TeaacIiloiDeniane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene NPTC2-Ctlorotoluene NPTC4-Cblortrtohiene ' NPTC144-TiimeAyIbeniene NPTCfcn-BuQrlbenzene NPTC1,2,4-TrimethyIbenzeae NPTCKc-ButylbeBzene • . • NPTC1,3-Dichlorobenzene1.4C>ichlonAcnienep-bopTopyltolnene NPTC1,2-DichloiDbenzeneihButylbenzene NPTC

1 (2v4*Tiicliloi6oenzeneNiphfliileaeHeuchlorobtttadienel -Tiidaloiobenzene NPTC

the 'Nominal Quantitaiion Umit'tactor is an overall correction &ctor applied to the method's NQLs for analytical adjustments madeduring me analysis (Le., for analyses of less man me ideal 25 ml for aqueous camples, and for sample dilutions prior to analysis),

• For example, if me NQL factor fcr a CRL water simple is 2. the estimated Actual Quantitation Limitfor vinyl chloride would be 2 ug/L(i.e.,2x 1 ug/L). •..-."

Rev. July 14. 1995

AR32I073 ,

Central Regional Labontory • Region HIExtractable Organic? Analysis /

Nominal Quandtadon Limits (NQL) )Unite Water -ng/L NPTC »Non-Prioxir/ MbtBt Target Compound1 . . .

Actual Quandtadon Limit =(NQLFactor) XNQL

62-75-9108-95-262-53-3111-44-495-57-9541-73-1106-46.7100-51-695-50-195-48-7108-60-1106-44-562144-767-72-198-95-378-59-188-75-5105-67-965-85-0111-91-112043-212042-191-20-3106-47-587-68-359-50-791-57-677-47-488-06-295-95-»91-58-788-74-4131-11-3208-964

N-NitosodimemylaminePhenolAnOmt ' NPTCbis(2-ChloroethyI)Emer2-Cnlorophenol •1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobemeneBenzyl Alcohol NPTC1,2-Dichtorbbenzene2-MemyIphenol NPTCbisO-chlorbSsopropylJElher4-Methylphenol NPTC

HexscbloroemaneNitrobenzene

Isophorons2-Nitrophenol2,4-DimemylphenolBenzole Add NPTCbis(2-Gdoroemoxy)Memane2,4-Dfchlorophenol1 ,4-TricnlorobenzeneNiphthilene4-Chlorotnflin* NPTC

4-Chloro-3-Metny >benol2-Metnylniphthilene ' • NPTCHexichlorocydopenadieno2,4.6-Trichlorophenol2.4>Trichlorophenol . NPTC2-Chloronaphth2lene2-Nitroinfline .' NPTC

Acenaphthylen*

10101010101010101010101010101010101050101010101010101010105010501010

99-09-283-32-951-28-5100-02-7132-64-9606-20-2121-14-284-66-2

7005-72-386-73-7100-01-686-304534-52-1101-55-3118-74-187-86-585414120-12-786-744

' 84-744206444)9247-5129-00485-68-791-94-156-55-311741-721841-9117444205-99-220748-950-324193-39-553-70-3191-24-2

3-Nltroinfline • NPTC

2.4-Diniirophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzoftmn NPTC2,6-DinittotDtaene2,4-DinitrotoluensDietbylphthiltte4-CnloropbenylphenyletherFtuorene4-NitrosnfliDB NPTCN-Nitrosodq3henylimine<l)4,6-Dinitro-2-Meitylphenol4-BromophenylphenyleaierHtMchlorobenzenePcfltichloipphdiolphenanihico*Andmceoe,Cutuzole ' NPTCDJ-n-ButylphilultteFluoranjheneBemidinePyitneBniylbenzylpailiilitB33-DicUorobenzidineBenzo(»)Aiiflinccne

ChiyseneDi-nOctylpMiilittBenzo(b)FhioiudienBBenzo(k)FhwraniJieneBenzo(»)Pyitne

Diben20(i(h)AnthraceneBeozo (jJi,i)Peiylene

50105050101010101010501050101050101010101050

•10 !102010101010101010101010

The "Nominal Quintftition Limifftctor is ta overafl collection factor applied to the method's NQLs for analytical adjustments madeduring me anatyds (Le.. for extraction* of more or less than the idea) 1000 ml for aqueous samples, for sample extracts notconcentrated to 1.00 ml due to excessive foaming/darkness of the extract, and for sample extract dilutions prior to analysis).

Rev. July 14. 1995

AR32I07U

Vp*;*'- *;*;•$»*;» •••!

Central Regional Laboratory • Region piPesticide and PCB Analysis

Nominal QuantKation Limits (NQL)Units: Water* u$- NPTC "Non-Priority Ponutant Target Compound

Actual Quantttaflon Limit • (NQL Factor) X NQL

319-84-631945-731046-85849-876-444309-00-21024-57-3959-984 .6047-17245-972-204

3321345472444

1031-07460-29-3

7421-93-463494-704

72-43-56103-71-96103-74-267-74-9

8001-35-2

AIpha-BHCBeta-BHCDeRa-BHCGamma-BHCHeptachlorAJdrin .Heptachlor EpoxUeEndosutfan 1 ,DteWrin4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosutfan II4(4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate4j4'-DDTEndrin AldehydeEndrin Ketone NPTCMethoxychlor NPTCAlpha-Chlordane .Oamma-ChtordaneCntordaneToxaphene

0.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.5004)50.051J>.5.0

12674-11-21104-2S-211141-16463469-21412672-29-61109749-111096424

Aredor-1016.Arodor-1221Arodor-1232Arodor-1242Arodor-1248Arodor-1254Arodor-1260

mom1.01.01.0

1.01.0

The "Nominal Quanttation tkntt" feted for each target compound Is based on the Superfund CLP Protocol The Actual QuanttationLimits are related to the NQLc by the NQL Factor. Thb NQL Factor reflects procedural steps, e.. extract dilution, which InfluencequanttaBon fimlts. , ~ , " ,

Section: ORGANICNarrative Page: 1

QC/H8 KXTRACTABtB ANALYSIS '* j

Analyst! ...'•• ' • -. ' . ' • • ' ' . . . '

Hoang Nguyen • .. • i , •LBSAT Chemist - . - •

WAD* 039S002

TDP: 0702 . . ' -

Method t , ' . - • > • .

The thirty-eight (39) aqueous samples from the Keystone Sanitation LP OU-2 sitewere analyzed for the presence of organic compounds listed as extract ablePriority Pollutants and CLP Hazardous Substances List Compounds. The sampleswere collected on June 24, 26, July 01 and 02, 1995. . These samples wereextracted by the continuous liquid/liquid extraction method on June 27, July 01and 08, 1996, These samples were analyzed on July 01, 02, 08, 09, 10 and 12,1996 following SOP* R3-QA211.0. ' This SOP is a consolidated method derived fromthe Superfund Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work and from RCRAmethodology (SW-846). Instrumentation utilized consisted of. a Hewlett Packard(HP) 5970 USD coupled to a HP 5890 Series II gas chromatograph equipped with anHP-7673A autosampler and SPB-5 30 meter capillary column. Concentrations of 'compounds were determined using the relative response of authentic standards tothe closest internal standard. These values have/been reported in the- RLIMSFinal Report. Only those compounds for which results are reported were detected.Sample'target compound values outside the calibration range were labeled with a»J". This indicates that the mass spectrum obtained for. the compound met theidentification criteria, yet the quantity present was outside the range for whichthe instrument accurately quantitates. All results qualified with a "J" are •' ' , jestimated quantities. The NQLs (nominal quantitation limits) are the \jquantitation limits that have been determined for each parameter analyzed by this ""method. The actual quantitation limit for a sample reflects the NQL as well asany dilution/concentration factor specific for each sample. .The NQL factor forall samples is equal, to 1.

The samples were also examined for the presence of compounds in addition to those ,on the Target Compound list. Authentic standards were not available to verify -these tentatively identified -compounds (TIC) results. Tentative identificationof these compounds .was made by the comparison of sample spectra to the EPA/NIST

. Mass Spectral Library. Concentrations for these compounds were estimated basedon the response of the closest internal standard and the assumption that the "instrument response for a given tentative compound was the same as the instrumentresponse for the Internal standards. These identifications have been reportedas tentative identifications with the associated quantitation values reported asestimated concentrations and qualified with a "T". The TICs in all sampleextracts have been corrected for any blank contamination. There were no TICsfound in the samples.

Quality Control; . >

Before acquisition of any sample data, the mass spectrometer is calibrated usingFC43. The calibration is verified by obtaining the spectrum .ofdecafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP). All mass assignments and relativeabundances are found to be in acceptable ranges or the instrument is adjusteduntil an acceptable spectrum of the known is obtained.

Immediately before analysis, each sample is spiked with an internal standard mixobtained commercially containing D4-l,4-dichlorobenzene, 08-naphthalene,DIO-acenaphthene, DlO-phenanthrene, Dl2-chrysene and D12-perylena. Allquantitations or estimates of concentration are made in comparison to theinternal standard nearest to the compound of interest. • V_X

9R32.I.0.76.

Section: ORGANIC' •..;'.- Narrative Page: 2

Quantitation was based on the' SO ng/ul standard. The initial calibration on July01 and 08, 1996 consisted of a five <5) point calibration (10, 20, 50, 80 and 100ng/ul} except for benzole acid which consisted of a four (4) point calibration(20, 50, 80 and 100 ng/ul). The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) forall confounds in.the initial calibration of the instrument on July 01, 1996 wasbelow thirty (30) percent. The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) forall compounds except for 4-chlorophenyl-phenylether tin the initial calibrationof the instrument on July 08, 1996 was below thirty (30) percent. The percentdifference (ID) for all compounds except for benzyl alcohol in the continuingcalibration check standards on July 02, 1996 was below twentyrf ive (25) percentwhen comparing the daily calibration standards to the initial calibration curve.The percent difference (%X» for all compounds in the continuing calibration checkstandards on July 09, 1996 was below twenty-five (25) percent when comparing thedaily calibration standards to the initial calibration curve. The percentdifference (%D) for all compounds except for 2,4-dinitrophenol in the continuingcalibration check standards on July 10 and 12, 1996 was below twenty-five (25)percent when comparing the daily calibration standards to the initial calibrationcurve. These compounds are qualified "J", estimated, for the positive resultsand "UJ", undetected estimated, for non-detected results in the affected samples.

For each group of samples extracted; a method blank is prepared and examined forlaboratory introduced contamination. Only target compounds in the samples withvalues less than or equal to ten times (<10X) the method blank, field blank,rinsate blank and/or equipment blank are reported with a "B" qualifier.

The samples were spiked with a mixture of six (6) surrogate compounds prior to'extraction. Recovery for each was determined to check.for matrix effect. Twohundred twenty-seven (227) out of two hundred twenty-eight (228) surrogaterecoveries were within Q.C. limits. The target limits are those established forthe CLP. The outlier was qualified "A*.

Two (2) aliquote from aqueous samples 960626-02 and 960703-02 were spiked witha priority pollutant cocktail mix containing twelve compounds at 100 ng/uL foracids and 50 ng/uL for base/neutrals (in the extract) and carried through theextraction and GC/KS. Forty-one , (41) out .of forty-eight (48) matrix spikerecoveries and twenty-three (23) out of twenty-four (24) %RPDs were withinacceptable limits. The outliers were qualified "A*.

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS: • • ' • " . ' ' • * • .

Site: Keystone Sanitation LF OU-2 . . •Program: Superfund Removal/Remedial '.UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.960626-01

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.960626-02




UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO.

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

TIC NAMENone Detected '

TIC NAMENone Detected


TIC NAME •None Detected'-'--.


TIC NAME

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

. • , • ... Section: ORGANICNarrative Page: 3

960626-06 None Detected . /

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLB NO. CAS ft960626-07




UNITSj ug/LSAMPLB NO. CAS ft960626-11

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLB NO. • CAS ft960626-12

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS ft960628-01




UNITS : ug/LSAMPLB NO CAS ft960623-05


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLB NO. CAS ft

TIC NAMBNone Detected

TIC NAMBLNone Detected


TIC NAMBNone Detected-

\ '' ' • > '







TIC NAMENone Detected •

TIC NAMBNone, Detected

TIC NAMB

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT <

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC960623-07 None Detected

v ' . • ' - . ' . * • ' . ' • •

UNITS: ug/L •SAMPLB NO. CAS ft TIC NAME_____' ______ RT_____CONC960628-03 None Detected

UNITS: ug/L 'SAMPLB NO. CAS ft_____TIC NAMB_____ • ' _______RT CONC960623-09 None Detected

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLB NO. CAS ft______TIC NAME •______..••-. RT_______CONC960623-10 None Detected .

AR32I078


UNITS: ug/L (

960628-11 ,

UNITS: ug/LSAMPLEJKX, CAS if960628-12


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO. CAS ft960703-02 .


UNITS: ug/LSAMPLE NO . CAS ft960703-04









TIC NAMENone Detected;

TIC NAMENone Detected •


TIC NAMENone Detected ,

TIC NAME :None Detected



TIC NAME 'None Detected

TIC NAME ^ •"'.'-None Detected

TIC NAMENone Detected ;


TIC NAMENone Detected. • •-•-•


TIC NAME vNone Detected :

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

RT

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

CONC

UNITS: ug/L . lSAMPLE NO. CAS ft______TIC NAME ________________£S_____ CONC960703-14 None Detected . •

AR32I079

. . . Section: ORGANIC • .; Narrative Page: 5

UNITS: ug/L i3AMPLB NO. CA3 ft TIC NAMB ______RJ_____ COVC V J950703-15 None Detected N—S

-.- AR32I080at**.'- •••,.


PCB/PESTICIDE ANALYSIS BY CC

Analyst: •'•' • •. ' •- : ' •,,•;;• • ' ' ••_..' • . .

Timothy M. Casey \LESAT Chemist

WAD: 0396002

TDF* 0703 . .

Method: • ' - '. ' •/ .".•• - '- . -1

The samples from Keystone Sanitation were analyzed by capillary column gaschromatography for polychlorinated biphenyle and organochlorine pesticides listedon the priority pollutants compound list. The samples were collected on June 24,26, July 1 and 2, 1996, The extractions of the aqueous samples were performedon June 27, July 2 and 8, 1996. Approximately one liter of each aqueous samplewas extracted between eighteen and twenty-four hours with methylene chloride bycontinuous liquid*liquid extraction.; Each extract was subsequently reduced to10 mil in hexane using Kuderna-Danish flasks. , The extractions and analyses wereperformed according to SOP R3-QA207.0. This SOP is a consolidated method derivedfrom the Superfund CLP Statement of Work. ,

Analysis of all sample extracts began on July 9, 1996 and continued until July12, 1996. All sample extracts were analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas-chromatograph (GO equipped with an automatic injector and dual electron capturedetectors (ECDs). All samples/'standards, and laboratory control solutions wererun on dual columns connected by an injector port tee. The fused silicacapillary column connected to the front BCD was a Restek Rtx-50 {30 m., 0.53 mmID). The fused silica capillary column connected to the rear BCD was a RestekRtx-1701 {30 m., 0.53 mm ID). Data were obtained from these analyses using theMillennium data acquisition and processing,software. Since both the front andrear columns were fully calibrated during analyses, the lower of the results fromthe two columns was used for reporting.Identification of organochlorine pesticides was accomplished by comparingretention times of known pesticides with the peaks observed in the sample extractchromatograms. A retention time window of 1% of the retention • time of thestandard chromatogram was used for identification of target compounds.Identification of PCBs was accomplished by matching the profile of known PCBswith patterns exhibited in the target sample chromatograms. Quantitation ofmulti-responding compounds was based on the average of several calibrated peaks.The quantitation of all surrogate compounds and target analytes-was based on afive-point linear regression where the correlation coefficient is greater than0.995 for pesticides, and on a three-point linear regression where thecorrelation coefficient is greater than 0.995 for PCBs.The KQLs (nominal quantitation limits) are the quantitation limits that have beendetermined for each compound analyzed by this method. The actual quantitationlimit is the NQL*multiplied by an SQLfactor specific for each sample. Unlessotherwise noted NQL factors for each sample are l. , '

AR32I08I


Quality Controlt

The two fused silica capillary, columns of the HP5890 Gas Chromatograph warecalibrated with five levels of the certified pesticide standards. A breakdowncheck standard and a mid-level check standard were analyzed concurrent withsample analyses. To monitor instrument stability, each sample sequence wasinterspersed with raid-level check standards and ended with a mid-level checkstandard. If initial and/or continuing calibration check criteria are notsatisfied for a particular analyte on one column, quantitation of that analytewill be performed using the other column (assuming valid linearity) .Iflinearity cannot be achieved on either column, the problem will be addressed, anda new curve will be generated.A representative standard or a three-point calibration for toxaphene and each PCSwas analyzed at the beginning of the analytical sequence for pattern recognitionor quantitation. The injection volume was 5 uL for the standards, samples, andquality control solutions. . An automatic sampler (HP 7673A) was used forinjection. 'Continuing calibration criteria were monitored for target pesticides. , Allcontinuing calibration check standards met acceptance criteria for all compounds.Surrogates tetrachloro-meta-xylene (TMX) and decachlorobiphenyl (DCBP) were addedto all target samples and quality control samples. With each sample set, alaboratory blank and matrix spikes (in duplicate) are analyzed. An in-houseperformance audit is analyzed at least quarterly to assure satisfactory methodperformance. Recoveries and duplicate results ~are monitored to demonstrateacceptable system performance.

Five (5) of the seventy-six (76) sample surrogate recoveries were outside the 60%- 150% advisory window. These values have been flagged with an "A".

All remaining quality control results were within the advisory limits. •. i J

AR32J082


VOA ANALYSIS BY PC/MS

Analyst; ; ' • " - - ' : .

Frederick PetraitisLESAT Chemist - '

KAbt 0396002 - .' '

0701 . . . ' - • . ;

Method; • .. . . " • • - • • ' . .-' ;:: . •-"" ' . • • ' • . ' '* . ,

A total of forty (40) aqueous sauries from Keystone Sanitation LF OU-2 wereanalyzed for the presence of volatile organic compounds amenable to purge and.trap and identifiable by mass spectrometry. Samples were collected on June 24,26, July 01 and 02, 1996 and analyzed on June 27, 26, July 01, 03 and 08, 1996following Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) #R3-QA210.1. ibis SOP is derivedfrom the Superfund Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work and from RCRAmethodology (SW 646). Instrumentation consisted of a purge and trap apparatus(Tekroar ALS 2016/LSC 2000) interfaced to a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer(HP 5690/KP 5970) equipped with a fused silica capillary column (VOCOL 105m x0.53mm ID x 3.0um film thickness) .Concentrations of compounds were determinedusing the relative response of authentic standards to the closest internalstandard. Only detected results are reported. 'Sample target compound valuesoutside the calibration range were lab'eled with a "J". This indicates that themass spectrum obtained for the compound met the identification criteria, yet thequantity present was outside the level for which the instrument accuratelyquantitates. ,A11 results qualified with a "J" are estimated quantities. TheNQ.LB (nominal quantitation limits) are the quantitation limits that have beendetermined for each parameter analyzed by this method. The actual quantitationlimit is the NQL multiplied by a factor specific for each sample. -The NQL factoris equal to 1 for'all samples. The NQL factor for all parameters analyzed wasequal to 1. ' . -.. ' • ' • ; . . : ';',..; .• • . . •

The samples were also examined for the presence of compounds in addition to thoseon the Target Compound list. Authentic standards were not available to verifythese tentatively identified compounds (TICs). Tentative identification of thesecompounds was made on the comparison of sample spectra to the EPA/KIST MassSpectral Library. Concentrations for these compounds were estimated based on theresponse of the closest internal standard and tie assumption that the instrumentresponse for. a given tentative compound was the same as the instrument responsefor the internal standards. These identifications have been reported astentative identifications with the associated quantitation values reported asestimated concentrations and were' qualified with a "T".

Quality Control;

Before acquisition of any .sample data, the mass spectrometer is calibrated usingFC43. The calibration is verified by obtaining the spectrum of a known compound'.Bromof luorobenzene (BFB).. All mass assignments and relative abundances are foundto be in acceptable ranges or the instrument is adjusted until an acceptablespectrum of the known is obtained. All' samples for this site were analyzedwithin the twelve hour BFB time criteria.

Immediately before analysis, each sample is spiked with internal standardsobtained commercially. All quantitatioris or estimates of concentrations are madein comparison to the internal standard nearest to the compound of interest.

AR32I083

' . Section: ORGANIC '. . '*•'.'. ; Narrative Page: 9.

• > . \ ' 'A lower detection limit (1.0 ug/L) waa requested for the low concentration method . / ~~"analysis of these samples., In order to achieve this detection limit, the •' • \ Jfollowing modifications to the above method were implemented: 1) twenty-five X-X(25) milliliters of sample were purged, 2) the initial calibration curve wasanalyzed at 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0 and 40.0 ug/L and 3} the daily calibrationcheck standard was analyzed at a concentration of 10.0 ug/L. The NQLs for allketones and 2-chloroethylvinylether for the initial calibration curve on June 25,1996 were 5.0 ug/L because a four (4) point calibration curve (5.0, 10.0, 20.0and 40.0 ug/L) was utilized; the lower detection limit waa achieved for all othercompounds. , . .For each day of sample analysis, a method blank (lab reagent blank - LRB) wasprepared and examined for laboratory introduced contamination. All compoundswhich were found in both a LRB, trip, rinsate or field blank and a sample werequalified "B" if.the-concentration of. the compound in the sample was less thanten times (<10X) the compound's concentration in the blank. -

The percent Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) for all compounds in the initialcalibration of the instrument on June 26, 1996 except vinyl acetate, was belowthe maximum %RSD limits listed in the SOP. The percent difference (%D) for allcompounds in the continuing calibration standard on June 27 and 28, 1996 wasbelow the maximum %D limits except vinyl acetate, when comparing the daily

1 calibration standard to the initial calibration curve. The percent differences(%Ds) for several compounds in the continuing calibration standards on July 01,03 and 03, 1996 were above the maximum %D limits, when comparing the dailycalibration standard to the initial calibration curve. These compounds werequalified "J", estimated, for the positive results and "UJ", undetectedestimated, for non-detected results in the affected samples.The samples and related QC were spiked with a mixture of surrogate compoundsprior to analysis. Recovery for each was determined to check for matrixinterferences. The target limits are those established by the CLP. Allsurrogate recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits. ' ,Two (2) aliquots each from samples 960626-02 and 960703-02 were spiked with 5 ulof the matrix spike target mix containing all spike compounds at a concentrationof 10 ug/L. The recovery for each compound was determined to check for matrixeffect. Recoveries have been corrected for target compounds present in thesample. The target limits are those established by the CLP. All MS/MSDrecoveries and nine (9) out of ten (10) RPDa were within CLP target limits. .Theoutlier was qualified,"A". • .

TffiTTATTVKI»Y IDKNTIglgD COMPOUNDS •

Site: Keystone Sanitation L? OU-2Program: Superfund Removal/Remedial . ,

SAMPLB NO. CA3 < TIC NAMB____________ R.T COWC. (ucr/Ll960626-01 1066-40-6 Silanol, trimethyl- , 15.96 3 T

SAMPLE NO. CA3 »______TIC NAMB___________' ' ._____R.T_____CONC.Jucr/L)960626-02 1066-40-6 Silanol, trimethyl- 15.95 1 T

0556-67-0 Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethy1- 29.74 1 T :

5AMPLB NO. GAS ft TIC NAMB _________ R.T_____CONC. (uq/L)960626-03

SAMPLB NO.960626-04

SAMPLB NO.960626-05

SAMPLB NO.

1066-40-6

CAS #

CAS

CAS

#

ff

Silanol, trimethyl-

TIC NAMBNone detected

TIC NAMBNone detected

TIC NAMB

15

R

R

R

.96

.T

.T

.T

1

CONCL

CONC.

CONC.

T

luor/L)

(uq/L)

(ucr/L)

AR.32I08-I*'


960626-06

SAMPLEJXO960626-07

SAMPLE NO.960626-08

SAMPLE NO.960626-09

SAMPLE NO.960626-10

SAMPLE NO.960626-11

SAMPLE NO.960626-12

SAMPLE NO.960626-13

SAMPLE NO.960628-01

SAMPLE NO.960628-02

SAMPLE NO.960628-03

SAMPLE NO.960628-04

SAMPLE NO.960628-05

SAMPLE NO.960628-06

SAMPLE NO.960628-07

SAMPLE NO.960628-08

SAMPLE NO.960628-09

SAMPLE NO.960628-10

SAMPLE NO.960628-11

SAMPLE NO.960628-12

SAMPLE NO.960628-13

SAMPLE NO.960703-01

CAS ft

CAS ft

' CAS'.'*0556-67-0

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft1066-40-6

CAS ft

None detectedTIC NAME

None detected

TIC NAME •None detected

. • "-"' : V. -TIC NAME

Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethyl-TIC NAME V

None , detectedTIC NAME

None detected•'•' TIC NAME '•None detected

TIC' NAME.None detected

TIC NAMESilanol, trimethyl-

TIC NAME •". .None detected :

TIC NAMENone detected


TIC NAME ' 'Silanol, trimethyl-



TIC NAMENone detected ,

TIC NAME-None detected

TIC NAME *None detected




TIC NAMENone , detected

R.T

R.T

R.T29.74

.R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T.15.99

R.T

R.T

R.T

•R.T16.02

R.T15.99

R.T16.01

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T16 .02

R.T16.00

R.T ;

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.' 1

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.1

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.1

CONC.3

CONC.1

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.2

CONC.2

CONC.

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)T

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)T

Jua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

Jua/L)T

(ua/L)T ..

(ua/L)T

(ua/L)

iua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)

(ua/L)T

(ua/L)T

(ua/L)

flR32!085

. . , • • • . • • • . • • Section: ORGANICNarrative Page: 11 •

'SAMPLB NO. CAS ft TIC N A M B _ _ _ _ _ _ _ R.T CONC. (ua/Ll960703-02 1066-40-6

SAMPLE NO. CAS 4960703-03

SAMPLB NO. CAS ft960703-04

SAMPLB NO. CAS #960703-05


SAMPLB NO CAS 8960703-07

SAMPLB NO. CAS *960703-03



SAMPLB NO. CAS #960703-11

SAMPLB NO. CAS ft •960703-12


SAMPLB NO . CAS *

Silanol, trimetnyl-TIC NAMB

None detectedTIC NAMB

None detected VTIC NAMB


None detected' TIC NAMB

None detectedTIC NAMB •

' None detected • .TIC NAMB


' None detectedTIC NAMB



None detected- TIC NAMB

16.03

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

R.T

1

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

CONC.

T .

(uer/L)

(ua/L)

(U«T/L)

lucr/L)

Jw/L)

(ua/L)

(uor/L)

iucr/L)

(w/L)

iucr/L)

lucr/L>

iuet/L)960703-14 None detected•' ' •

ftR32 I 086

3

6th

Walnut

Sts.

ennsylvania

19106

EtrtON

.. 6th &

P

R

Curtis Bl

dg.

Philadelohia.

T, -•

t\ .&$ \<o\~\Q

ODY RECORD

V _

• 'CHAIN OF CU

UN.Ati

men

MUItC

nforce

r EI/M

.Office o

(—

in

tel ?.o<

°

IIevaodWOO

u*

I

crCi

«o|COC50%

od

e;;

COCO

A

-OCl

r:

1fr-l

a

5

Ci

coto

§< I §1 41 Tl ilTI .''I n >\ n •

«5D?• c

fr-«

«d

3S

CMCP

CO

a tin

C"CO

cojCO

r

's

cicr-cy.co

c s»

t

CO

*>•->

>A"

Ol

O3CO1

co=%cs

sr*

OQ(

C'.

CO

CO

.s

"S_£

aI£C

OC

s

1I/I1

rsrt.o

08

S.

AR32I087

• '.".•••'*8SSf~:. "HM-asdi27ar"QUESTIONS? CALL 800-238-5355TOLLFREE. mCXIHSHUUSBt * . «

MMQ5Q3i57&SfRECIPIENT'S COPY

fHOLafMPKK-Uf.PitatFfDBlAMmHut

City State* [ZpRequired

COMMAND SKOAL HANDLING

D ThrtPjny D On T»P«I D

Totel Total Total

Mb Employe. NurW, R|V,$ION OAT£ OT2' I

__ FORMAT

AR32I088

IONS

th

Walnut St

s.nl

vani 9106

REG

g., 6t

a. Pe

RCurtis Bldg.

PhiladelDhia.

r '>— 'CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

. AGENCY

P-NTA

Office

R\

"• Z'ZO O Z'«

o e ,5 >*, * , BVUO

SI lz l?l .' I -woo

oIo

1,

PIUi

c-

COCO

2J

«»

et00C-2CO

COcs

U

eroCO

COCd

•54*44

Lt

GOCO

COo

cr«|c*00

COcdcd

IS*

COCd

eg- Id su. I :.. u .1 J>l I :l :l. II l.M J I L L I. II2.1

ed

4

o?.Jx:

^Vt

fS.to

rf-v

CO

Cn

ocCO

CO

1(A

I

O

•o.2

* ifu ' ! ua.- u1= |CC

I* LS ' §V

'0

'5o-c3cr"SC

•ei•s1

x

2' 7

1^

I

o

a- Q *r' - AR32I-089

Region III, Central Regional Laboratory .Annapolis, -Maryland

HAZA2D AHD RISt ZTPOSimZ DATA. SHZET • -fLE7ZLS 0? PZRSOHAL PJLOTZCTIOS OU3J3G SAHnJBC ' V J

BACKGROUND'

. Under the authority of Section 104 of the' Comprehensive Environmental Response. ,Compensation, and Liability Act (CE3.CLA, or Superfund) of 1980, Section 311 of the CleanWater Act, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) , E?A hasbeen delegated the responsibility to undertake response actions with respect to therelease or potential release of oil. petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose a •substantial threat to human uealth. or welfare, or the environment.

'

This fora is 'to be used when, collecting Environmental .Saareles (i.e. streams, farmponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous S&arales (i.e. drums, storage tanks,lagoons, leachates; hazardous waste sites). This information is intended for use. as aguide for the safe handling of these, laboratory samples in accordance wich E?A and OSKA.regulations.' The sample classification(s) and levels. of personal protection used bythe -sampler, in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of potentialexposure to* subs-ar.ces in air, splashes of liquids, or other direct contact wirhaarerial due co work being done. . ; .

. .__ __ Level A: Highest level of. respiratory, skin, and eye protection needed. •

^ - '. Fully encaps'tlaced suit, respirator self-ccntaiaed (Tazx type)'II _ ___ Level 5: Highest level of respiracory prsception brr lesser level of , I J*~'- skin protection needed. ,/ • . . •• . ^-^

Cheaical suit, respirator self- coo' ained (Tank rype) . '_ ___ Level C: ' Lesser level of respiratory proteczion than Level 3. Skin

protection criteria are similar to Level 5. . ,Chemical suit, caaaister , respirator/carrricge •

/V Level D: Work uniform without any respirator or ski=. hazards.Lab coat-, gloves etc. .

• ' CLASSIFIED FIELD SAftFLES. ~ . /

___ Environmental ; __ Hazardous X Comb. (Zzrv. at,Haz.) _'_ Radioactive

Site Sane: &£<T $7 <?*£ t-P _______ Sampling Date:

Sta No.Field pH:

(must be taken prior to submission of aqueous samples)

Sampler: S &0 Ci,tlJLi4' . _______ Work Phcr.e N-caber

PersdnaL observations ac time of sampling (surroundings) :

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors e tc . } fcc ?+££*d&G&<cii' ^ —

.v.i (Your Name) Please Print Your Phone Number (Very (mporttrt) b (Racipienf* Name) Please Print ! ftoowKi Pnont Ngiw rvt-y mow:

w . . - . . • . • - • • . < , ) . • / : ......Company Department/Floor No.

Street Address

City . State ZIP Required.

CopnPa'V . Department Floor No

Exact Street Address (Wi dmaOtlnn U fO. Ions tr f.O. /* Ctea.)

Wy • State (BP Required

rowHCKAGIMG -.11 D........

'6D«n£mnBr12 P/ZDOfWAT-13 Q«Bflf«|)r

uQfmerrnBf>•»*-. iftrrvK^wuMr*

SOrifJOrVWK

"O&HS56Q«nertfrTW» Draff «<•53£]flB>Er*0rMQHBBmiK

- **HJxiKlfrii*w«wi s-.

«D$&<iDâSf

3 jwiQAUftKagftMOS

5Q«Qmr«f • u»7 Q] omgtsfccuiscwicc*DD .

10 QD

Total 'Total Total

. If HOLD KK HCK-UP. frint fCDfKUOats Hfft.Street^ Address

O HMumSnonwntD Tf»rBP.ity DCngToO»' DCngToHQMStreet Address

City Stale Zv

Received By:

XDateTime Received FedEx Employee Number

REV.S,0\0*TEZ92

i k

15b].ReleaseI Signelure

HR32I09I

AR32I092

OFRegion III, Central Regional Laboratory. Annapolis, Maryland ..

•pATATTI USS *Tgr irrPQgTTBT PAT* yUKR-f

LEVELS OF PEESOHAL PBDTECTItiH DC2IHG SAKTLXBG

ACKCROUTO

Dnder-the authority of Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, Section 311 of the CleanWater Act, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCBA) , EPA hasbeen delegated the. responsibility sto undertake response actions with respect to therelease or potential release of oil, petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose asubstantial threat to human health or Velf are, or the environment.

• CENTRAL _ . ' . - . - " . • . ' . • " . - • " ' • • ' " • ' , , ' - • • ' ' - . - • . . .

This form is to be .-used when. collecting ErTviror.gent£l Samples (i.e.. streams, farm'- ponds, wells, soils etc.) and for • Hazardous Sam-pies (i.e. drums, storage tanks,

lagoons, leachates, hazardous vaste sites). This' information is intended for use as aguide for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with EPA and OSKAregulations. The sample class if ication(s) and levels. of personal protection used by .the sampler in all situations will enable the analyst to be better aware of -potential

- exposure to .substances in • air* splashes'- of liquids, cr other direct ccr.tact with ' ' • - . .nate rial due to work being done. • •

DECUZZ OF PROTECTTON , '- . ' " '// ' . ; .' . ' - . ' ' , J, • - ' - I : " ' . * ' • ' • • _ • • • ' '

Level A: Highest level of. respifatary,, skin, and eye protection needed. .'/ , • F ly encaps-clared s-ait, respirator self -contained (Tank type)•\ j Level S: Highest level of respiratery pzotecticn 'V-t lessfei" levai of" r' , skin protection 'needed. ' - ..,' • -

' Chemical suit, respirator self-ccnsaiaee ("aaJc type) ''• Level C: Lesser level of respiratory protection than Level E. Skin • • .

• protection criteria are siailar -to Level B.. , . • Chenical suit, "cazaiscer, respirator/ cartridge •/< Level D: Work uniform without any -respirator or sicia. hazards.

Lab coat,, 'gloves etc.- - - ; • ' ' .' ' ' * : • . - . . ' • . ' ' •

ClASSTrTED FIELD SAMPLES '• ' '. ' ' '

'_ Environmental • '.'., Hazardous X Coab . (Ecv. &Eaz.) rUcioaetivet - . ' . ' " " . . . . " . • * • ' . . ' "

Site Name : Lff SrC t t- Qf-'Jt L ______ Sampling Date : 7/ *

Sta No.Jield pH:

(must be taker, prior to subsissibn of aqueous samples)

Sampler;, >'.r/p- (I t* f.W,i , . . , ; ' -. work Phone Number : -V ' (. C

Personal observations' at tiae .'c'f "saacling. (surrouadings) : i>^< i- -.

.Sample collection .observations .(physical .sample, odors e te .

.

^ t wvOr —— *j\ R 3 2 | 0 9 3

Region III, General Regional LaboratoryAnnapolis, -Maryland :

pA-ntB' AHD HISX ZXPOSUBZ DAZA SHEET1E7ZLS 0? PE-SOHAL PaOTZCTIOH DU2I5G

BACKGROUND '> ' ' • , ' .

.Under the authority of Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfuad) of 1980, Section'311 'of the CleanWater Act, and Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) , EPA hasbeen delegated the responsibility to undertake response, actions' with respect to therelease or potential release of oil, petroleum, or hazardous substances that pose asubstantial threat to human health or welfare, or the environment. •

GENERAL • ' , - - ; • • • - . ' • • • ' " . • , • ' , . ' • .

This fora is to be used when, collecting Enviroragental Samples. (i.e. streams, farm .ponds, wells, soils etc.) and for Hazardous Saaroles ( i '.«. drums , storage tanks,lagoons, leachares, hazardous waste sites). ' This information is intended for use as aguide' for the safe handling of these laboratory samples in accordance with: EPA.aad OSKA.regulations. The sample classification(s) and levels • of personal protection used bythe sampler ir. all situations will enable the analyst to be. better aware of potentialexposure to substances in air,, splashes of liquids, cr 'other direct contact with •material cue'ra work being done. , • ,

aSI OF r '-

Level A: ' Highest level of. respiratory, skin, and eye protection needed.Fully encapsulated suit, respirator self-contained (Tank type)

Level 3: Highest level of respiratory prott'ctios but lesser level of - ^ Jskin protection needed. ^ • -Chemical suit, .respirator self -contained (Tank type) . ,

Level C: Lesser level of respiratory protection than Level. 3. Skin ' ' •protection criteria -are similar to Level 3. . , •Chemical suit, cannister respirator/carrricge . .

Level D: Vork uniform without any respirator or skis, hazards . -.Lab coat, gloves etc. , ' : . .

i ' * ' * 'CLASSinZD FIELD SAMPLES '.

' ___ Environmental ; __ Hazardous X Comb . (Env. &Haz.) Radioaetivs

Site Name: L £jf T<>'P£ ^ QfJ' . ______ Samoliag Date: 7 A <

Sta No. A «- • 76 . Ail, -77 .Field pa: 6.7C .6. (,-i . i.Jlt .' ____ _ __ .

(must be taken prior to submission of aqueous samples)

Sampler: .faTTO C t'AAjf' . _______ __J7ork Phone Number •&£. •/£< J3'

ParsonaL observations at tiae of sampling (surroundings): ____ . •

Sample collection observations (physical sample, odors etc.)_

AR32 I 091+

Gannett Fleming, : Baltimore, MD 21210

Fax: (410)433-6520Office: (410) 433-6832

JulyS, 1996

Mr. Doug BuffingtonUSEPA Centra! Regional Laboratory. . . . .839 Bestgate Road \ ^ ;Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Re: ERA Contract No.; 68-W8-0037 IERA Work Assignment: 37-34-3JZZKeystone Sanitation Landfill Site -ERA Region III DAS Case Number R3279:Shipping Date: Direct Delivered by Gannett Fleming, July 3, 1996 •Federal Express Airbill No.: Not Applicable

Dear Mr. Buffington:

The purpose of this letter is to correct errors on the Sample Tags for Station Number RW-75 (ERASample Number 2790702R75) in the above referenced shipment. The time of sampling wascorrectly reported as 1650 on the ERA Chain of Custody Form 3-16601 for ERA sample Number2790702R75. However, the sample tags for ERA Sample Number 2790702R75 contained a time of1640, which was actually the time the sampler arrived at the sampling location, not the time thesample was collected. Therefore, all tags for ERA Sample Number 2790702R75 should have had atime o f 1650. . , . - ' / ' .

We apologize for any inconvenience these discrepancies may have caused.

Sincerely,, • vGANNETT FLEMING, INC.

Sidney J. Curren

cc: Annette Lage (CRL). Christopher Corbett (ERA Region ill)

Rayo Bhumgara (GF)William Wentworth (HNUS)

File: 29529.001/4.0

A Tradition" of Excellence Since 1915AR32I095

Documents

1 Gannett Fleming · 2019-12-03 · 7 ' 1 Gannett Fleming I ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Suite 200 • East Quadrangle Village of Cross Keys Baltimore, MD 21210