22

8.conference leuven study

  • View
    415

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: 8.conference leuven study
Page 2: 8.conference leuven study

Commuting by motorcycleimpact analysis

a study of Transport & Mobility Leuven for FEBIAC

Page 3: 8.conference leuven study

Commuting by motorcycle

1.Impact modal shift on traffic congestion• Case study Leuven-Brussels• Global impact on Belgian highway network

2.Impact modal shift on traffic emissions• Emissions motorcycles vs. passenger cars• Case study Leuven-Brussels

Page 4: 8.conference leuven study

Impact on traffic congestion

Case study Leuven-Brussels

1) Reference scenario: current morning peak (2011)2) Scenario 10% modal shift from car to motorcycle

Page 5: 8.conference leuven study

Reference scenario (morning peak 2011)

•Dynamic simulation of traffic flows by LTM

•Realistic representationin line with traffic counts

42 detectors on 7 locations

May 2011, every 5 minutes:volumes, speeds, composition

Capacity network sections

Page 6: 8.conference leuven study

Brussel Leuven

Reference scenario - simulation results (6.30 – 9.30)

Free-Flow

Capacity

Congestion

Referentiescenario 6u40

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 6u50 Referentiescenario 7u00

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 7u10

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 7u20

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 7u30

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 7u40

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 7u50

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u00

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u10

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u20

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u30

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u40

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 8u50

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 9u00

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 9u10

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 9u20

Brussel Leuven

Referentiescenario 9u30

Brussel Leuven

Page 7: 8.conference leuven study

Reference scenario (morning peak 2011)Travel Times

Page 8: 8.conference leuven study

Reference scenario (morning peak 2011)Travel Times

Total time loss(all vehicles Leuven-Brussels 6.30 – 9.30)

= 1925 hours

Page 9: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Assumptions:

•10% passenger cars replaced by motorcycles•Occupancy passenger car (commute) = 1.1•Occupancy motorcycle (commute) = 1.0

Page 10: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Assumptions:

•Passenger-Car-Equivalent (PCE) motorcycle(How many cars would have same effect on traffic flows?)

• PCE = 1 for min. density• PCE = 0.5 at capacity• PCE = 0 for max. density

Page 11: 8.conference leuven study

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 6u30

Referentiescenario 6u40

Scenario 10% modal shift 6u40

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 6u40

Referentiescenario 6u50

Scenario 10% modal shift 6u50

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 6u50

Referentiescenario 7u00

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u00

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u00

Referentiescenario 7u10

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u10

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u10

Referentiescenario 7u20

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u20

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u20

Referentiescenario 7u30

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u30

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u30

Referentiescenario 7u40

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u40

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u40

Referentiescenario 7u50

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u50

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 7u50

Referentiescenario 8u00

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u00

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u00

Referentiescenario 8u10

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u10

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u10

Referentiescenario 8u20

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u20

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u20

Referentiescenario 8u30

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u30

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u30

Referentiescenario 8u40

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u40

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u40

Referentiescenario 8u50

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u50

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 8u50

Referentiescenario 9u00

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u00

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u00

Referentiescenario 9u10

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u10

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u10

Referentiescenario 9u20

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u20

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u20

Referentiescenario 9u30

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u30

Brussel Leuven

Brussel Leuven

Scenario 10% modal shift 9u30

Page 12: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Travel Times

Page 13: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Travel Times

Total time loss(all vehicles Leuven-Brussels 6.30 – 9.30)

= 706 hours

(- 60% to reference)

Page 14: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Total time loss (all vehicles Leuven-Brussels 6.30 – 9.30)

taking into account newly attracted traffic on highway due to improved traffic conditions

= 1158 hours

(- 40% to reference)

Page 15: 8.conference leuven study

Modal shift scenario (morning peak 2011)Travel Times

25% modal shift needed to avoid congestion

Page 16: 8.conference leuven study

Global impact on traffic congestionExtrapolate impact to Belgian highway networkReference: 37.000 hours lost per day

Time savings: 15.000 hours per day

Time benefits: 210.000 € per day 50 Million € per year (indicative figure)

- 40% time lost in modal shift scenario

Value of time commuter 13.96 €/h

Page 17: 8.conference leuven study

Global impact on traffic congestionImpact on underlying road network:

- less (rat-run) traffic, shift to highway network

- if also modal shift on underlying road network:similar time benefits

Page 18: 8.conference leuven study

Impact on emissionsEmission factor ‘mean’ car (mean Belgian vehicle fleet)

Emission factor ‘recent’ motorcycle (250cc, Euro 3)(source: COPERT IV emission functions 2010)

Emissions CO2 , NOX , PM2.5 lower for recent motorcycles

CO2 NOx PM2.5 HC

Page 19: 8.conference leuven study

Impact on emissionsTotal Emission costs (€/100 km)

(monetization based on environmental damage: NOX : 0.58 €/kgPM2.5 : 135.5 €/kg

HC: 7.5 €/kgCO2 : 20 €/ton

‘mean’ car

‘recent’ motorcycle

Emission costs 20% lower for recent motorcycles

Page 20: 8.conference leuven study

Impact on emissionsTotal Emission costs in case study Leuven-Brussels:

(all vehicles Leuven-Brussels 6.30 – 9.30)

6% lower in modal shift scenario c.t. reference

1% due to shift in traffic composition5% due to avoided traffic congestion

Page 21: 8.conference leuven study

ConclusionsImpact modal shift (10%) on traffic congestion: • Queues are shorter and disappear more quickly• Travel times are shorter• Total time losses reduced by 40% • Time benefits on Belgian highway network: 50 M€/year

Impact modal shift (10%) on traffic emissions: • Recent motorcycles emit less CO2 , NOX , PM2.5 , but more HC• Total emission costs 20% lower for recent motorcycles• Total case study emission costs 6% lower, 5% due to avoided congestion

Page 22: 8.conference leuven study

Additional information Isaak YpermanTransport & Mobility [email protected]

Stijn [email protected]