View
217
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 1/291
GULF OF MEXICO RESEARCH PLANComprehensive Supporting Documents
SEPTEMBER 2009
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 2/291
MASGP-09-024
Tis project was partially unded by the National Sea Grant College Programo the U.S. Department o Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the FloridaSea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program,
Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, and exas Sea Grant College Program. Te views expressed herein do not necessarily refect the views o those organizations.
Texas • Louisiana • Florida
Mississippi-Alabama
Suggested citation: Sempier, S.H., K. Havens, R. Stickney, C. Wilson, and D.L. Swann. 2009. Gul o MexicoResearch Plan. MASGP-09-024.
Document design adapted rom a template provided by Patricia Andersson, Oregon Sea GrantDocument designed by Melissa Schneider, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant ConsortiumMap graphic on cover designed by Tanya Baker, Texas Sea Grant College ProgramCover photos:
Top let: Melissa Schneider/Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant ConsortiumBottom let: Collier County Sheri ’s Ofce Aviation Bureau
Top right: Texas Sea GrantBottom right: Marisol Amador/University o Florida/Institute o Food and Agricultural Sciences
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 3/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 2
Gulf of Mexico Research Priorities Arranged by ORPP‐defined Societal Themes and Research Priorities
Gulf of Mexico research priorities are arranged by “Top Tier,” which are the research priorities that support
the Gulf of Mexico high‐priority topic areas included in the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan, and “Second
Tier” priorities, which are the remaining Top 10 workshop priorities, supporting Top 11‐20 workshop
priorities, and survey comments that were not captured within a high‐priority topic area. The priorities are
arranged by ORPP theme and research priority.
ORPP Theme: Improving Ecosystem Health
Understand and predict the impact of natural and anthropogenic processes on ecosystems
Ocean Research Priorities Plan Research Priority 14 (ORPP RP14)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Predict the impacts of current building and permitting practices on freshwater inflow and examine
the effects of human manipulation (e.g. upstream impoundments, causeways, placing processed
water into confined areas) on the amount, timing, and type of freshwater inflows and their impacts
on natural resources and the environment
• Analyze the
role
of
freshwater
input
on
coastal
wetlands
and
habitat
change
over
time
to
determine
the hydrologic requirements of healthy marsh systems and quantify effects of sediment discharge
reduction on erosion rates and habitat loss
• Examine the impacts of higher saline water and temperature change on water stratification,
biodiversity, species composition and production, benthic communities, trophic interactions,
fisheries, the range of native and non‐native species, emergent coastal habitats, and sediment
transport and shoreline erosion
• Evaluate the relationship of coastal development, land use, land cover, storm water and wastewater
management on eutrophication, nutrient loading, water quality, and the environment
• Identify the relationships between nutrient loading, eutrophication, hypoxia, and harmful algal
blooms;
examine
their
impacts
on
ecosystem
health,
seagrasses,
and
higher
trophic
organisms;
and
determine the effects of freshwater diversion on hypoxia
• Model the impacts of non‐point source pollution on coastal resources
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Examine impacts of global climate change on local ecosystems, and design flexible ecosystem
models to predict local impacts
• Determine the response of organisms and the emergence or prevalence of pathogens in response to
changing levels of temperature, salinity, carbon dioxide, wind, and other climate‐linked factors
• Examine Gulf of Mexico watershed systems in terms of evaluating current sediment, freshwater
volume, and nutrient loads in these systems to better assess the potential for restoring critical areas
and habitats
• Evaluate the total potential of Mississippi River restoration considering sediment, freshwater
volume, nutrients, and optimal distribution of the Achafalaya and Mississippi Rivers.
Apply understanding of natural and anthropogenic processes to develop socioeconomic assessments and
models to evaluate the impact of multiple human uses on ecosystems (ORPP RP15)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Identify social and economic drivers that influence how communities use their resources; examine
why communities make different conservation decisions; and determine and catalog the
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 4/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 3
socioeconomic impacts and value of changing the level of protection (increasing or decreasing
protection) and restoration of ecosystems at various scales and determine how this impacts resource
users, communities, and the environment (including if habitat functions as expected)
• Identify the true costs and true benefits of future coastal development and include the economic
impacts of climate change on maritime activities, oil and gas, fisheries, infrastructure, and tax base
• Predict the socioeconomic and ecological impacts of future coastal development and population
growth in the coastal zone based on projections of future development and including an
examination of
the
historic
and
prehistoric
human
densities
in
the
coastal
zone
• Examine the balance between optimizing future coastal development while minimizing
environmental impacts, maximizing quality of life, and maintaining public access
• Examine the economic, cultural, and intrinsic value of working waterfronts including economic,
social, and environmental cost‐ benefit analyses of working waterfronts to compare with other
waterfront uses
• Characterize Gulf of Mexico fishing communities using socioeconomic methods, and determine the
economic feasibility of alternatives to wild harvest fisheries such as aquaculture
• Model economic impacts to fisheries production, recreational uses of the resources, and community
resiliency
• Determine the
benefits
and
costs
of
restoration
and
include
the
development
of
models
to
understand these costs and benefits
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the educational programs related to our natural resources and improve
the methodologies of sharing information with the public so that communities can make more
informed decisions
Apply understanding of marine ecosystems to develop appropriate indicators and metrics for
sustainable use and effective management (ORPP RP16)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Determine the correct variables to use as indicators of ecosystem health, identify the optimal
methods
to
measure
the
indicators,
and
design
better‐
defined
indices
with
more
indicators
to
evaluate the status of ecosystems
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Design rapid field‐ based standardized tests for the detection of specific variables that will identify
the presence of bacteria, contaminants, toxins, and pathogenic organisms at harmful levels
ORPP Theme: Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Resources
Understand interspecies and habitat/species relationships to support forecasting resource stability and
sustainability (ORPP RP2)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Identify connections among habitats and connections between habitats and living marine resources
• Model resource stability and sustainability and include interactions between fisheries, habitat,
threatened and endangered species, ecosystem processes, and stressors to assist with making
ecosystem‐ based management decisions
• Examine changes in habitat quality and quantity over time and identify the effects of changes on
marine organisms including the threshold level of habitat quality and quantity required to support
sustainable populations of living resources
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 5/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 4
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Analyze the trophic relationships of commercially valuable species, endangered species, and
invasive species and predict ecosystem changes influencing the removal of commercially valuable
species
• Determine how resource diversity and abundance responds to changes in ecosystem structure and
function; identify what changes are caused by natural versus anthropogenic causes; and analyze the
relationship between
living
resource
sustainability
and
water
quality,
invasive
species,
tourism,
coastal development, urban development, land use, and marine aquaculture
• Examine the impact of climate change on fish ecology, mortality, fecundity, recruitment,
distribution, migration, and predator‐prey interaction
• Evaluate the relative importance of different sites in the Gulf of Mexico that support resource
abundance and diversity by examining water circulation, gene flow, larval transport and
connectivity of habitats and populations in the region
• Formulate a method to measure the effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas
Understand human‐use patterns that may influence resource stability and sustainability (ORPP RP3)
Second Tier
Gulf
of
Mexico
Priorities
• Establish the value of Gulf of Mexico ecosystem services, including depleted and renewable
resources
• Model the value of various habitats and ecosystems to allow for informed decisions on the
placement, construction, development, and expansion of marine facilities and operation
Apply advanced understanding and technologies to enhance benefits of various natural resources from
the open ocean and coasts (ORPP RP4)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Identify methods for improving aquaculture grow‐out technology for stock enhancement and other
purposes
and
examine
the
environmental
and
economic
impacts
of
marine
and
estuarine
aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico including the impacts of mariculture in shallow, warm waters
• Evaluate innovative uses of oil platforms such as generating alternative energy, collecting weather
data, developing ecotourism options, and rearing marine organisms
Understand the status and trends of resource abundance and distribution through more accurate, timely,
and synoptic assessments (ORPP RP1)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Develop more accurate assessments of biodiversity on a micro (genetic and molecular ecology) and
macro (population) level
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 6/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 5
ORPP Theme: Increase Resilience to Natural Hazards
Apply understanding to develop multi‐hazard risk assessments and support development of models,
policies, and strategies for hazard mitigation (ORPP RP7)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Determine and predict the physical impacts of climate change on coastal and upland areas in terms
of sea level change, rate of elevation change, shoreline change, loss of barrier islands, role of coastal
development in
preventing
migration
of
marshes
and
other
habitats,
and
change
in
inland,
coastal,
and ocean hydrology and apply this knowledge in habitat restoration efforts
• Examine the public’s perception of sea level change; evaluate hazard‐related communications and
people’s change in behavior in relation to hazard mitigation; and identify approaches that local
governments are employing to adapt to sea level change
• Predict socioeconomic impacts of climate and sea level change on population dynamics, community
infrastructure, short‐ and long‐term community demographic shifts, social capital, and commerce
and shipping centers
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Characterize and
model
community
and
ecological
resilience
to
natural
hazards
considering
the
ecological footprint and level of vulnerability of the built environment and identify methods to
reduce losses; and model the attributes, factors, and strategies that contribute to making a
community successfully resilient
Understand response of coastal and marine systems to natural hazards and apply that understanding to
assessments of future vulnerability to natural hazards (ORPP RP6)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Determine how storm surge, subsidence and sea level change affects ecosystems, native coastal
habitat, wetland composition, saltwater intrusion, coastal flooding, cultures, agriculture, and human
health
• Identify the optimal use and allocation of sediment and evaluate the rates of shoreline change from
anthropogenic and natural impacts including sediment mobilization, transport, and deposition from
major storm events
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Analyze how coastal and nearshore morphology, vegetation, beaches, dunes, coastal forests, and
wetlands protect inland areas from hurricane impacts by absorbing wind and storm surge energy;
and determine the economic value (e.g. costs and benefits) of natural protective features
Understand how hazard events initiate and evolve, and apply that understanding to improve forecasts of
future hazard events (ORPP RP5)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Design updated real‐time storm surge models and products that include meteorological, land use
and land cover, and improved boundary data to better predict impacts from storms
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 7/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 6
ORPP Theme: Enhancing Human Health
Understand sources and processes contributing to ocean‐related risks to human health (ORPP RP17)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Determine how environmental factors (e.g. sea temperature, salinity, industrial discharge,
agricultural inputs, freshwater inflow, and water quality) and large‐scale events (e.g. climate change
and tropical storms) influence the occurrence, intensity, and duration of harmful algal blooms,
toxins, and
pathogens
and
develop
harmful
algal
bloom
transport
models
for
near
shore
waters
• Incorporate integrated studies to examine the affects and transport of wastewater on human health,
drinking water, and water quality including improving the ability to identify contaminant sources
such as raw and partially treated sewage
Understand human health risks associated with the ocean and potential benefits of ocean resources to
human health (ORPP RP18)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Examine and predict how changes in water quality, temperature, runoff, and mercury levels impact
seafood safety and quality and determine the effects of bioaccumulation, harmful algal blooms and
other harmful
substances
on
the
safety
of
seafood
products
• Identify the relationship between temperature change and Vibrio species and improve prediction
capabilities related to the occurrence and duration of this pathogen in a given body of water
Apply understanding of ocean ecosystems and biodiversity to develop products and biological models
to enhance human well‐being (ORPP RP20)
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Analyze marine and coastal derived products to determine their potential for pharmaceuticals and
other biological‐ based products
ORPP Theme: The Oceanʹs Role in Climate
Understand the impact of climate variability and change on the biogeochemistry of the ocean and
implication for its ecosystems (ORPP RP12)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priorities
• Determine changes in freshwater, nutrient, pollution, groundwater and sediment input due to
changes in pattern and quantity of precipitation and predict the subsequent impact of these inputs
on geochemical and physical coastal processes and biological (including benthic and epibenthic)
communities
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Develop and
validate
numerical
circulation
models
and
techniques
for
data
assimilation
• Evaluate the best locations for sensors to record climatological, wind, atmospheric, and ocean
circulation data and use Observation System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) to determine optimal
placement of sensors
Note: Other climate‐related research priorities are captured elsewhere in this document.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 8/291
Supplemental Document: GMRP First and Second Tier Priorities 7
ORPP Theme: Enabling Marine Operations
Understand the interactions between marine operations and the environment (ORPP RP8)
Top Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Examine how river diversions and the placement of sediment impact water quality, sediment
processes, shoaling, coastal processes, fisheries, habitat utilization by organisms, and marshes and
other habitats
Second Tier Gulf of Mexico Priority
• Determine impacts of past and present navigation practices, shipping including shallow‐draft
PANAMAX super‐containers, port facilities, shallow‐water dredging and non‐dredging sediment
management on water and air quality, sediment transport, land loss and erosion, circulation,
ecosystem health, and human health
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 9/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix A:
Planning and Review Council Membership
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 10/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan Planning and Review Council Membership
(as of June 28, 2008)
Name Affiliation Becky
Allee
NOAA
Coastal
Services
Center
Gloria Car EPA Gulf of Mexico Program
Jean Cowan National Marine Fisheries Service Restoration Center
Deborah Epperson Minerals Management Service
Jorge Euan‐Avila Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados Unidad Mérida (CINVESTAV)
Doug Frugé US Fish and Wildlife Service
Kola Garber National Sea Grant Office
Callie Hall NASA Engineering and Science Directorate
Phillip Hinesley
Alabama
Department
of
Conservation
and
Natural
Resources
Jack Kindinger USGS Center for Coastal and Watershed Studies
Richard Leard Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
Larry Massey MEXUS‐Gulf Program
Bruce Moulton Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Worth Nowlin Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System/Texas A&M University
Mark Peters USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Susan Rees US Army Corps of Engineers
David Ruple Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve
David Shaw Northern Gulf Cooperative Institute/Mississippi State University
Larry Simpson Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission
Gary Springer Gulf of Mexico States Accord
Kerry St. Pé Barataria‐Terrebonne National Estuary Program
Buck Sutter NOAA Gulf of Mexico Regional Team
Wes Tunnell Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies/ Texas A&M University/
Southern Association of Marine Labs
Bill Walker
Mississippi
Department
of
Marine
Resources
Steven Wolfe Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Alejandro Yáñez‐
Arancibia Instituto de Ecología A.C. (INECOL)
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 11/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix B:
Results from the Gulf of Mexico Strategic Plan Analysis
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 12/291
Gulf of Mexico Strategic Plans with Links
to the Ocean Research Priorities Plan Themes and Priorities(117 strategic plans reviewed as of August 2007)
;
Theme Research Priority (RP)
Number of
mentions
Percent of
all mentions
in RP
Rank of RP
based on
mentions
Percent of
mentions
in theme
Improving
Ecosystem
Health
Understand and predict the impact of natural and
anthropogenic processes on the ecosystem316 20.8% 1
34.8%
Apply understanding of marine ecosystems to develop
appropriate indicators and metrics for sustainable use and
effective management
168 11.1% 3
Apply understanding of natural and anthropogenic pro-
cesses to develop socioeconomic assessments and models
to evaluate the impact of human uses on ecosystems
44 2.9% 11
Stewardship
of Natural
and Cultural
Resources
Understand interspecies and habitat/species relationships
to support forecasting resource stability and sustainability270 17.8% 2
32.9%
Understand status and trends of resource abundance and
distribution through assessments133 8.8% 4
Understand human-use patterns that influence
resource stability54 3.6% 9
Apply understanding and technology to enhance benefitsof various natural resources
42 2.8% 12
Increase
Resilience to
Natural
Hazards
Understand response of coastal and marine systems to
natural hazards and apply understanding to assessments
of future vulnerability to natural hazards
56 3.7% 7
8.7%Apply understanding to develop multi-hazard risk assess-
ments and support development of models, policies, and
strategies for hazard mitigation
55 3.6% 8
Understand how hazard events initiate, evolve, and apply
that understanding to improve forecasts of hazard events21 1.4% 18
Enhancing
Human Health
Understand sources and processes contributing to ocean-
related risks to human health84 5.5% 5
8.7%
Understand human health risks associated with the oceanand potential benefits of ocean resources to human health
26 1.7% 14
Understand how human use and valuation of ocean
resources can be affected by ocean-borne human
health threats and how human activities can influence
these threats
16 1.1% 19
Apply understanding of ocean ecosystems and biodiver-
sity to develop products and biological models to enhance
human well-being
6 0.4% 20
Enabling
Marine
Operations
Understand interactions between marine operations and
the environment83 5.5% 6
8.4%
Apply understanding of environmental factors affecting
marine operations to characterize and predict conditions
in the maritime domain
23 1.5% 16
Apply understanding of environmental impacts and
marine operations to enhance the marine transportation
system
22 1.4% 17
The Ocean’s
Role in
Climate
Understand the impact of climate variability and change
on the biogeochemistry of the ocean and implication for
its ecosystems
45 3.0% 10
6.6%Understand ocean-climate interactions within and
across regions30 2.0% 13
Apply understanding of the ocean to help project future
climate changes and their impacts25 1.6% 15
Totals 1,519 100% 100%
GMRP Appendix B 1
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 13/291
Description of columns
ThemeThe theme described in the Ocean Research Priorities Plan (ORPP).
According to the ORPP each theme has equal importance.
Research priority (RP)The research priority described in the ORPP that relates to the
given theme.
Number of mentions
Number of goals/priorities/focus areas described in Gulf of Mexico
strategic plans that mention a research priority similar to the one
described in the ORPP.Percent of all mentions in RP Percent of total mentions that link to the research priority.
Rank of RP based on mentionsRank of the total mentions between strategic plans and ORPP research
priority (1 = most mentions to 20 = least mentions).
Percent of mentions in theme Percent of total mentions to all research priorities that were in the theme.
Background The Ocean Research Priorities Plan (ORPP) was released on Jan. 26,
2007, by the NSTC Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technol-
ogy. The plan “presents national research priorities that focus on the most
compelling issues in key areas of interaction between society and the
ocean.” The ORPP is the result of the first national-level, multi-agencyeffort to identify research priorities and develop an implementation
strategy to address these priorities. It provides a framework for national-
level ocean research and presents six equally weighted themes and 20
research priorities supporting the six themes.
This August 2007 version of the matrix attempts to identity the areas of
emphasis of Gulf of Mexico (GOM) research in relation to the research
priorities and themes described in the ORPP. Strategic plans from groups
that conduct, sponsor or directly use GOM research were collected and
analyzed. Because only the text of the strategic plans was available and
the amounts of effort and funding for each priority or goal in the strate-
gic plans were not provided, this analysis required that equal weight be placed on each priority or goal within and between strategic plans regard-
less of scope, level of effort or funding level of the strategic plan.
More information For more information about the Gulf of Mexico research planning
process and to download all plans used in this analysis, access the
project’s Web site at: http://masgc.org/gmrp or contact Steve Sempier
at stephen.sempier@usm.edu.
MASGC-08-006
This publication was supported by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the Florida Sea Grant Program, Louisiana Sea Grant
Program, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflec
the views of those organizations.
GMRP Appendix B 2
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 14/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix C:
Gulf of Mexico Research Information Needs Survey
The online survey was created in SurveyMonkey and is included in the following pages. Note that skip
logic was incorporated into the survey so not all respondents were presented with every question
included in the survey.
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 15/291Page 1
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Survey to Prioritize Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs
Introduction
This survey is being conducted by the Gulf of Mexico Regional Research and Information Needs Project (GMRP) through the Gulf of
Mexico Sea Grant College Programs and numerous partners. The results of this survey and other forms of constituent input will be
used to develop a regional priorities plan for Gulf of Mexico research. The survey is designed to identify regional research needs and
is structured around the Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy, which was recently developed to shape the
future direction of ocean research on a national level.
Your participation is essential. This survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete, but you may take as much time as
necessary to provide comments.
If you would like to receive emai ls about the progress of the project you may do so by adding your contact information at the end of
the survey. We will only use this contact information to communicate GMRP-related work and your contact information will not be
shared with others.
Thank you for your help with this survey.
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 16/291Page 2
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
To sort responses into subregions we would like to collect some background information from you.
In w hat state do you primarily reside?
Residence
*Alabama
nmlk j
Florida
nmlk j
Louisiana
nmlk j
Mississippi
nmlk j
Texas
nmlk j
Campeche
nmlk j
Quintana Roo
nmlk j
Tabasco
nmlk j
Tamaulipas nmlk j
Veracruz
nmlk j
Yucatan
nmlk j
Other state (please specify)
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 17/291Page 3
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
In w hat Alabama county do you primarily reside?
Alabama Counties
Autauga
nmlk j
Baldwin
nmlk j
Barbour nmlk j
Bibb
nmlk j
Blount
nmlk j
Bullock
nmlk j
Butler
nmlk j
Calhoun
nmlk j
Chambers
nmlk j
Cherokee
nmlk j
Chilton
nmlk j
Choctaw
nmlk j
Clarke
nmlk j
Clay
nmlk j
Cleburne
nmlk j
Coffee
nmlk j
Colbert
nmlk j
Conecuh
nmlk j
Coosa
nmlk j
Covington
nmlk j
Crenshaw
nmlk j
Cullman
nmlk j
Dale
nmlk j
Dallas
nmlk j
De Kalb
nmlk j
Elmore nmlk j
Escambia
nmlk j
Etowah
nmlk j
Fayette
nmlk j
Franklin
nmlk j
Geneva
nmlk j
Greene
nmlk j
Hale
nmlk j
Henry
nmlk j
Houston
nmlk j
Jackson
nmlk j
Jefferson
nmlk j
Lamar
nmlk j
Lauderdale
nmlk j
Lawrence
nmlk j
Lee
nmlk j
Limestone
nmlk j
Lowndes
nmlk j
Macon
nmlk j
Madison
nmlk j
Marengo
nmlk j
Marion
nmlk j
Marshall
nmlk j
Mobile nmlk j
Monroe
nmlk j
Montgomery
nmlk j
Morgan
nmlk j
Perry
nmlk j
Pickens
nmlk j
Pike
nmlk j
Randolph
nmlk j
Russell
nmlk j
St. Clair
nmlk j
Shelby
nmlk j
Sumter
nmlk j
Talladega
nmlk j
Tallapoosa
nmlk j
Tuscaloosa
nmlk j
Walker
nmlk j
Washington
nmlk j
Wilcox
nmlk j
Winston
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 18/291Page 4
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
In what Florida county do you primarily reside?
Florida Counties
Alachua
nmlk j
Baker
nmlk j
Bay nmlk j
Bradford
nmlk j
Brevard
nmlk j
Broward
nmlk j
Calhoun
nmlk j
Charlotte
nmlk j
Citrus
nmlk j
Clay
nmlk j
Collier
nmlk j
Columbia
nmlk j
Dade
nmlk j
De Soto
nmlk j
Dixie
nmlk j
Duval
nmlk j
Escambia
nmlk j
Flagler
nmlk j
Franklin
nmlk j
Gadsden
nmlk j
Gilchrist
nmlk j
Glades
nmlk j
Gulf
nmlk j
Hamilton
nmlk j
Hardee
nmlk j
Hendry nmlk j
Hernando
nmlk j
Highlands
nmlk j
Hillsborough
nmlk j
Holmes
nmlk j
Indian River
nmlk j
Jackson
nmlk j
Jefferson
nmlk j
Lafayette
nmlk j
Lake
nmlk j
Lee
nmlk j
Leon
nmlk j
Levy
nmlk j
Liberty
nmlk j
Madison
nmlk j
Manatee
nmlk j
Marion
nmlk j
Martin
nmlk j
Monroe
nmlk j
Nassau
nmlk j
Okaloosa
nmlk j
Okeechobee
nmlk j
Orange
nmlk j
Osceola nmlk j
Palm Beach
nmlk j
Pasco
nmlk j
Pinellas
nmlk j
Polk
nmlk j
Putnam
nmlk j
St. Johns
nmlk j
St. Lucie
nmlk j
Santa Rosa
nmlk j
Sarasota
nmlk j
Seminole
nmlk j
Sumter
nmlk j
Suwannee
nmlk j
Taylor
nmlk j
Union
nmlk j
Volusia
nmlk j
Wakulla
nmlk j
Walton
nmlk j
Washington
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 19/291Page 5
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
In w hat Louisiana parish do you primarily reside?
Louisiana Parishes
Acadia
nmlk j
Allen
nmlk j
Ascension nmlk j
Assumption
nmlk j
Avoyelles
nmlk j
Beauregard
nmlk j
Bienville
nmlk j
Bossier
nmlk j
Caddo
nmlk j
Calcasieu
nmlk j
Caldwell
nmlk j
Cameron
nmlk j
Catahoula
nmlk j
Claiborne
nmlk j
Concordia
nmlk j
De Soto
nmlk j
East Baton Rouge
nmlk j
East Carroll
nmlk j
East Feliciana
nmlk j
Evangeline
nmlk j
Franklin
nmlk j
Grant
nmlk j
Iberia
nmlk j
Iberville
nmlk j
Jackson nmlk j
Jefferson
nmlk j
Jefferson Davis
nmlk j
Lafayette
nmlk j
Lafourche
nmlk j
La Salle
nmlk j
Lincoln
nmlk j
Livingston
nmlk j
Madison
nmlk j
Morehouse
nmlk j
Natchitoches
nmlk j
Orleans
nmlk j
Ouachita
nmlk j
Plaquemines
nmlk j
Pointe Coupee
nmlk j
Rapides
nmlk j
Red River
nmlk j
Richland
nmlk j
Sabine
nmlk j
St. Bernard
nmlk j
St. Charles
nmlk j
St. Helena
nmlk j
St. James nmlk j
St. John the Baptist
nmlk j
St. Landry
nmlk j
St. Martin
nmlk j
St. Mary
nmlk j
St. Tammany
nmlk j
Tangipahoa
nmlk j
Tensas
nmlk j
Terrebonne
nmlk j
Union
nmlk j
Vermilion
nmlk j
Vernon
nmlk j
Washington
nmlk j
Webster
nmlk j
West Baton Rouge
nmlk j
West Carroll
nmlk j
West Feliciana
nmlk j
Winn
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 20/291Page 6
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
In w hat Mississippi county do you primarily reside?
Mississippi Counties
Adams
nmlk j
Alcorn
nmlk j
Amite nmlk j
Attala
nmlk j
Benton
nmlk j
Bolivar
nmlk j
Calhoun
nmlk j
Carroll
nmlk j
Chickasaw
nmlk j
Choctaw
nmlk j
Claiborne
nmlk j
Clarke
nmlk j
Clay
nmlk j
Coahoma
nmlk j
Copiah
nmlk j
Covington
nmlk j
DeSoto
nmlk j
Forrest
nmlk j
Franklin
nmlk j
George
nmlk j
Greene
nmlk j
Grenada
nmlk j
Hancock
nmlk j
Harrison
nmlk j
Hinds
nmlk j
Holmes
nmlk j
Humphreys
nmlk j
Issaquena
nmlk j
Itawamba
nmlk j
Jackson
nmlk j
Jasper nmlk j
Jefferson
nmlk j
Jefferson Davis
nmlk j
Jones
nmlk j
Kemper
nmlk j
Lafayette
nmlk j
Lamar
nmlk j
Lauderdale
nmlk j
Lawrence
nmlk j
Leake
nmlk j
Lee
nmlk j
Leflore
nmlk j
Lincoln
nmlk j
Lowndes
nmlk j
Madison
nmlk j
Marion
nmlk j
Marshall
nmlk j
Monroe
nmlk j
Montgomery
nmlk j
Neshoba
nmlk j
Newton
nmlk j
Noxubee
nmlk j
Oktibbeha
nmlk j
Panola
nmlk j
Pearl River
nmlk j
Perry
nmlk j
Pike
nmlk j
Pontotoc
nmlk j
Prentiss nmlk j
Quitman
nmlk j
Rankin
nmlk j
Scott
nmlk j
Sharkey
nmlk j
Simpson
nmlk j
Smith
nmlk j
Stone
nmlk j
Sunflower
nmlk j
Tallahatchie
nmlk j
Tate
nmlk j
Tippah
nmlk j
Tishomingo
nmlk j
Tunica
nmlk j
Union
nmlk j
Walthall
nmlk j
Warren
nmlk j
Washington
nmlk j
Wayne
nmlk j
Webster
nmlk j
Wilkinson
nmlk j
Winston
nmlk j
Yalobusha
nmlk j
Yazoo
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 21/291Page 7
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
In w hat Texas county do you primarily reside?
Texas Counties
Anderson
nmlk j
Andrews
nmlk j
Angelina nmlk j
Aransas
nmlk j
Archer
nmlk j
Armstrong
nmlk j
Atascosa
nmlk j
Austin
nmlk j
Bailey
nmlk j
Bandera
nmlk j
Bastrop
nmlk j
Baylor
nmlk j
Bee
nmlk j
Bell
nmlk j
Bexar
nmlk j
Blanco
nmlk j
Borden
nmlk j
Bosque
nmlk j
Bowie
nmlk j
Brazoria
nmlk j
Brazos
nmlk j
Brewster
nmlk j
Briscoe
nmlk j
Brooks
nmlk j
Brown
nmlk j
Burleson
nmlk j
Burnet
nmlk j
Caldwell
nmlk j
Calhoun
nmlk j
Gillespie
nmlk j
Glasscock
nmlk j
Goliad nmlk j
Gonzales
nmlk j
Gray
nmlk j
Grayson
nmlk j
Gregg
nmlk j
Grimes
nmlk j
Guadalupe
nmlk j
Hale
nmlk j
Hall
nmlk j
Hamilton
nmlk j
Hansford
nmlk j
Hardeman
nmlk j
Hardin
nmlk j
Harris
nmlk j
Harrison
nmlk j
Hartley
nmlk j
Haskell
nmlk j
Hays
nmlk j
Hemphill
nmlk j
Henderson
nmlk j
Hidalgo
nmlk j
Hill
nmlk j
Hockley
nmlk j
Hood
nmlk j
Hopkins
nmlk j
Houston
nmlk j
Howard
nmlk j
Moore
nmlk j
Morris
nmlk j
Motley nmlk j
Nacogdoches
nmlk j
Navarro
nmlk j
Newton
nmlk j
Nolan
nmlk j
Nueces
nmlk j
Ochiltree
nmlk j
Oldham
nmlk j
Orange
nmlk j
Palo Pinto
nmlk j
Panola
nmlk j
Parker
nmlk j
Parmer
nmlk j
Pecos
nmlk j
Polk
nmlk j
Potter
nmlk j
Presidio
nmlk j
Rains
nmlk j
Randall
nmlk j
Reagan
nmlk j
Real
nmlk j
Red River
nmlk j
Reeves
nmlk j
Refugio
nmlk j
Roberts
nmlk j
Robertson
nmlk j
Rockwall
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 22/291Page 8
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Callahan
nmlk j
Cameron
nmlk j
Camp
nmlk j
Carson
nmlk j
Cass
nmlk j
Castro
nmlk j
Chambers
nmlk j
Cherokee
nmlk j
Childress
nmlk j
Clay
nmlk j
Cochran
nmlk j
Coke
nmlk j
Coleman
nmlk j
Collin
nmlk j
Collingsworth
nmlk j
Colorado
nmlk j
Comal
nmlk j
Comanche
nmlk j
Concho
nmlk j
Cooke
nmlk j
Coryell
nmlk j
Cottle
nmlk j
Crane
nmlk j
Crockett
nmlk j
Crosby
nmlk j
Culberson
nmlk j
Dallam
nmlk j
Dallas
nmlk j
Dawson
nmlk j
Deaf Smith
nmlk j
Delta
nmlk j
Hudspeth
nmlk j
Hunt
nmlk j
Hutchinson
nmlk j
Irion
nmlk j
Jack
nmlk j
Jackson
nmlk j
Jasper
nmlk j
Jeff Davis
nmlk j
Jefferson
nmlk j
Jim Hogg
nmlk j
Jim Wells
nmlk j
Johnson
nmlk j
Jones
nmlk j
Karnes
nmlk j
Kaufman
nmlk j
Kendall
nmlk j
Kenedy
nmlk j
Kent
nmlk j
Kerr
nmlk j
Kimble
nmlk j
King
nmlk j
Kinney
nmlk j
Kleberg
nmlk j
Knox
nmlk j
Lamar
nmlk j
Lamb
nmlk j
Lampasas
nmlk j
La Salle
nmlk j
Lavaca
nmlk j
Lee
nmlk j
Leon
nmlk j
Runnels
nmlk j
Rusk
nmlk j
Sabine
nmlk j
San Augustine
nmlk j
San Jacinto
nmlk j
San Patricio
nmlk j
San Saba
nmlk j
Schleicher
nmlk j
Scurry
nmlk j
Shackelford
nmlk j
Shelby
nmlk j
Sherman
nmlk j
Smith
nmlk j
Somervell
nmlk j
Starr
nmlk j
Stephens
nmlk j
Sterling
nmlk j
Stonewall
nmlk j
Sutton
nmlk j
Swisher
nmlk j
Tarrant
nmlk j
Taylor
nmlk j
Terrell
nmlk j
Terry
nmlk j
Throckmorton
nmlk j
Titus
nmlk j
Tom Green
nmlk j
Travis
nmlk j
Trinity
nmlk j
Tyler
nmlk j
Upshur
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 23/291Page 9
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Denton
nmlk j
De Witt
nmlk j
Dickens
nmlk j
Dimmit
nmlk j
Donley
nmlk j
Duval
nmlk j
Eastland
nmlk j
Ector
nmlk j
Edwards
nmlk j
Ellis
nmlk j
El Paso
nmlk j
Erath
nmlk j
Falls
nmlk j
Fannin
nmlk j
Fayette
nmlk j
Fisher
nmlk j
Floyd
nmlk j
Foard
nmlk j
Fort Bend
nmlk j
Franklin
nmlk j
Freestone
nmlk j
Frio
nmlk j
Gaines
nmlk j
Galveston
nmlk j
Garza
nmlk j
Liberty
nmlk j
Limestone
nmlk j
Lipscomb
nmlk j
Live Oak
nmlk j
Llano
nmlk j
Loving
nmlk j
Lubbock
nmlk j
Lynn
nmlk j
McCulloch
nmlk j
McLennan
nmlk j
McMullen
nmlk j
Madison
nmlk j
Marion
nmlk j
Martin
nmlk j
Mason
nmlk j
Matagorda
nmlk j
Maverick
nmlk j
Medina
nmlk j
Menard
nmlk j
Midland
nmlk j
Milam
nmlk j
Mills
nmlk j
Mitchell
nmlk j
Montague
nmlk j
Montgomery
nmlk j
Upton
nmlk j
Uvalde
nmlk j
Val Verde
nmlk j
Van Zandt
nmlk j
Victoria
nmlk j
Walker
nmlk j
Waller
nmlk j
Ward
nmlk j
Washington
nmlk j
Webb
nmlk j
Wharton
nmlk j
Wheeler
nmlk j
Wichita
nmlk j
Wilbarger
nmlk j
Willacy
nmlk j
Williamson
nmlk j
Wilson
nmlk j
Winkler
nmlk j
Wise
nmlk j
Wood
nmlk j
Yoakum
nmlk j
Young
nmlk j
Zapata
nmlk j
Zavala
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 24/291Page 10
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
What is the total number of years you have lived in a state bordering the Gulf of
Mexico?
Please select one of the follow ing that best describes your affi l iation.
Background Information
Never lived in a state bordering the Gulf of Mexico
nmlk j
<1-10
nmlk j
11-20
nmlk j
21-30
nmlk j
31-40
nmlk j
41-50
nmlk j
51 or more
nmlk j
Business/Industry nmlk j
Education, K-12
nmlk j
Education, University/College
nmlk j
Government, City
nmlk j
Government, County/Parish
nmlk j
Government, State
nmlk j
Government, Federal
nmlk j
Non-Governmental Organization
nmlk j
Other (please specify)
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 25/291Page 11
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
This section of the survey provides insight about your personal perspectives of Gulf of Mexico research and how yo
use research findings.
Select the theme(s) that best describes your occupational interest (select up to
three that best apply).These themes were identified in the January 2007 Ocean Research
Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy.
Indicate (in the boxes to the right) the number of years you have primarily:
Which best describes your primary relationship with Gulf of Mexico research?
Relationship to Gulf of Mexico Research
*
Conducted research in the Gulf of Mexico
Sponsored/Administered Gulf of Mexico research
programs
Used research findings as part of your profession
(but not as a researcher or research
sponsor/administrator)
*
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources (e.g. examine resource dynamics, value resources, discover new uses
for coastal resources)
gfedc
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards (e.g. forecast hazard events, predict impact of hazards)
gfedc
Enabling Marine Operations, Business and Commerce (e.g. predict maritime conditions, enhance marine transportation,
understand interactions between the environment and marine operations such as ports, shipping, aquaculture, and energy
extraction)
gfedc
The Ocean's Role in Climate (e.g. study and model ocean-climate interactions, examine impact of climate on biogeochemistry
and ecosystems, project future climate change)
gfedc
Improving Ecosystem Health (e.g. understand and predict natural and anthropogenic impacts to ecosystems, produce
socioeconomic assessments to evaluate human impacts, develop metrics for management)
gfedc
Enhancing Human Health (e.g. examine and model positive and negative impacts of marine based natural resources, value
ocean-borne human health threats, develop ocean based products to enhance human health)
gfedc
None of the Above
gfedc
Conduct research in the Gulf of Mexico
nmlk j
Sponsor/Administer research in the Gulf of Mexico
nmlk j
Use Gulf of Mexico research findings as part of your profession
nmlk j
Use Gulf of Mexico research fi ndings for recreational purposes
nmlk j
Do not use Gulf of Mexico research findings nmlk j
Other (please specify)
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 26/291Page 12
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Please select only one of the following disciplines that best describes your Gulf of
Mexico research?
Follow up Question for Researchers
Anthropology
nmlk j
Atmospheric sciences
nmlk j
Biological sciences
nmlk j
Chemical sciences
nmlk j
Computer and Information sciences
nmlk j
Economics
nmlk j
Education
nmlk j
Engineering
nmlk j
Geological sciences
nmlk j
Physical sciences
nmlk j
Political science/Law/Policy
nmlk j
Other (please specify)
nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 27/291Page 13
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Rate the follow ing in terms of their value in enhancing collaboration between Gulf of
Mexico research programs.
Follow up Question for Administrators
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Developing new
partnerships in existing
regional initiatives
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Increasing funding to
existing regional
initiatives
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Developing new funding
initiatives that have multi-
state requirements
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Developing new funding
initiatives that do not
have multi-state
requirements
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Aligning state and
regional programs with
national plans such as the
Ocean Research Priorities
Plan and Implementation
Strategy
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Addressing mandates for
regional coordination from
your agency/organization
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Serving on regional work
groupsnmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Reviewing a synthesis of
regional research activitiesnmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Reading documents about
the results of other
research
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 28/291Page 14
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Please rate the value of the follow ing as a user of Gulf of Mexico research results.
Follow up Question for Research Users
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Direct one-on-one contact
with researchersnmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Raw research data
provided directly from a
researcher
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Access to databases that
contain raw research datanmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Summarized data that
has been interpreted by
the researcher that
collected the data
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Research results
interpreted by individuals
within your organization or
another third party
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Inventory of current
research conducted
throughout the Gulf of
Mexico including the
names of the individuals
conducting the research
and project descriptions
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Regional meetings where
researchers are
presenting results of their
work
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
National meetings where
researchers are
presenting results of their
work
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Research results
published in peer
reviewed journals
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 29/291Page 15
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
The six societal themes and subsequent research areas quoted in this section were identified in the January 2007
release of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy. Please rate the priority level of each
research area considering its relevance to the Gulf of Mexico over the next fifteen years.
1) Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
“The ocean is a source of food, minerals, and energy and is used for transpor tation, recreation, and
tourism. The ocean preserves a record of the nation ’ s cultural past. The ocean remains a vast,
unexplored realm w ith the capacity to provide new pharmaceuticals , industrial products, and energy
sources. At the same time, its resources are subject to many pressures, such as overfishing, habitat
destruction, and competition w ith invasive species.”
Prioritization of Research Areas (page 1 of 3)
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand the status
and trends of resource
abundance and
distribution through more
accurate, timely and largescale assessments
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand interspecies
and habitat/species
relationships to support
forecasting resource
stability and sustainability
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand human-use
patterns considering
economic, sociological,
and cultural factors that
may influence resource
stability and sustainability
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply advanced
understanding and
technologies to enhance
the benefits of various
natural resources from the
open ocean and coasts
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 30/291Page 16
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
2) In creasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
“Communiti es, maritime operations, cultural resources , social services, and ecosystems are
vulnerable to coastal and marine physical hazards. Although society cannot eliminate natural hazards
their impacts can be reduced. Sustained and coordinated investment in research and technology w ill
provide the know ledge and information base to assess and reduce risk, save lives and property,
ensure more rapid recovery and effective mitigation, and develop informed and effective responses tofuture hazard events.”
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand how hazard
events initiate and evolve
and apply that
understanding to improve
forecasts of future hazard
events
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand the response
of coastal and marine
systems to natural
hazards and apply that
understanding toassessments of future
vulnerability to natural
hazards
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding to
develop multi-hazard risk
assessments and support
development of models,
policies, and strategies for
hazard mitigation
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
This question continues onto the next page.
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 31/291Page 17
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Rate the priority level of each research area considering its relevance to the Gulf of Mexico over the next fifteen
years.
3) Enabling Marine Operations
“Marine operations require freedom of navigation in the global ocean and the ability to conduct
mapping and char ting activities, gather tide and current information, and use U.S. ports, harbors,
estuaries, and the Great Lakes. Marine operations also deal w ith issues such as bridge clearance,
dredging, navigation aids, and ice coverage. Forward-thinking, innovative research, coupled w ith
technological advances, will permit marine operations to meet challenging requirements for increased
levels of transportation and commerce in the maritime domain and to address security concerns,
while balancing sustainable use and protection of the environment.”
4) The Ocean ’ s Role in Climate
“The ocean plays a fundamental role in governing climate through its capacity to store and distribute
heat and carbon. The challenge is to accurately assess the ocean’ s past and present state, processes
and phenomena influencing climate, and society’ s influence on them, and to improve predictions and
projections of climate change. These predictions and projections w ill improve society’ s ability to
respond to and reduce, where feasible, climate related hazards; to adapt to climate change and
variations (e.g., sea-level rise, changing weather patterns); and to inform management and policy
decisions addressing human and environmental impacts.”
Prioritization of Research Areas (page 2 of 3)
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand the
interactions between
marine operations and
the environment
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
environmental factors
affecting marine
operations to characterize
and predict conditions in
the maritime domain
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
environmental impacts
and marine operations to
enhance the marine
transportation system
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand ocean-climate
interactions within andacross regions
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand the impact of
climate variability and
change on the
biogeochemistry of the
ocean and implications for
its ecosystems
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
the ocean to help project
future climate changes
and their impacts
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 32/291Page 18
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
This question concludes on the next page.
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 33/291Page 19
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
Rate the priority level of each research area considering its relevance to the Gulf of Mexico over the next fifteen
years.
5) Improving Ecosystem Health
“Comprehensive, wel l-focused, interdisciplinary research can provide the information needed to
balance competing uses of the marine environment, to better predict the impacts of such use, to
manage those impacts in a manner that ensures the long-term health and sustainability of marine
ecosystems, and to help restore ecosystems damaged from past and current activities or events.”
Prioritization of Research Areas (page 3 of 3)
Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand and predict
the impact of natural and
anthropogenic processes
on ecosystems
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
natural and human
caused processes to
develop socioeconomic
assessments and models
to evaluate the impact of
multiple human uses on
ecosystems
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
marine ecosystems to
develop appropriate
indicators and metrics for
sustainable use and
effective management
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 34/291Page 20
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
6) Enhancing Human Health
“The ocean can be a source of health hazards. Understanding the causes of health hazards and how
they can be mitigated or managed w ill lead to fewer illnesses from contaminated seafood, polluted
waters, known and emerging disease-causing microbes, and harmful algal blooms (HABs). In the next
decade, efforts to enhance human health w ill focus on the cause, prevention, and treatment of
disease. The ocean also holds abundant resources that convey a variety of health benefits to humansExploration of new hab itats, combined w ith emerging biochemical and biotechnical techniques, w ill
promote discovery and development of bioproducts that promote human health.” Very Low Low Medium High Very High No Opinion
Understand sources and
processes contributing to
ocean-related risks to
human health
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand human health
risks associated with the
ocean and the potential
benefits of ocean
resources to human
health
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Understand how human
use and valuation of
ocean resources can be
affected by ocean-borne
human health threats and
how human activities can
influence these threats
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
Apply understanding of
ocean ecosystems and
biodiversity to develop
products and biological
models to enhance
human well-being
nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j nmlk j
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 35/291Page 21
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs SurveyGulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey
List very high research priorities for the Gulf of Mexico over the n ext fifteen years
that have not been addressed in previous questions.
Are there any additional comments regarding this survey, the regional planning
effort, or the use of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan as a framework to identify
regional needs?
Please provide your contact information if you wish to be included in future
correspondences related to this project.
Open comments
First Name
Last Name
Organization or
Affil iation
Email Address
Upon clicking “done” you will be sent to the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan (GMRP) website. You will be able to access preliminary
survey results from this webpage. You can bookmark this page to access updated survey results at any time. Connection to the GMR
website will indicate that your survey response was received and recorded.
Thank you for your time and input. Click done to submit your response to this survey.
GMRP Appendix C
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 36/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix D:
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs
Survey Results
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 37/291
Table of Contents 1. Summary Results ........................................................................................................................ 1
2. County Level GIS Maps of Results ............................................................................................. 3
Results by ORPP‐defined Theme.......................................................................................... 5
Results by ORPP‐defined Research Priority ..................................................................... 12
3. Survey Respondent Comments Overview................................................................................ 32
Comments Organized by ORPP Themes and Research Priorities
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Resources.................................................. 33
Increase Resilience to Natural Hazards................................................................ 41
Enabling Marine Operations................................................................................. 45
The
Oceanʹ
s
Role
in
Climate ................................................................................. 47
Improving Ecosystem Health ............................................................................... 50
Enhancing Human Health .................................................................................... 61
Comments Organized by Other Categories...................................................................... 63
Education and Communication Needs........................................................... 63
Information Needs ............................................................................................. 64
Coordination, Policy, and Management Needs............................................. 67
Habitat / Restoration Topics ............................................................................. 72
General Responses to Open‐Ended Question .................................................................. 74
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 38/291
Theme(RP number identifies research priorities that are affiliated with each theme.)
Average
rating*
Improving Ecosystem Health (RP 14-16) 4.21
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources (RP 1-4) 4.14
The Ocean’s Role in Climate (RP 11-13) 4.07
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards (RP 5-7) 4.00
Enhancing Human Health (RP 17-20) 3.75
Enabling Marine Operations (RP 8-10) 3.73
Research Priority
Average
rating*
Understand and predict the impact of natural and anthropogenic processes on ecosystems (RP 14) 4.30
Understand human-use patterns considering economic, sociological, and cultural factors that may influence resource
stability and sustainability (RP 3) 4.26
Apply understanding of marine ecosystems to develop appropriate indicators and metrics for sustainable use and
effective management (RP 16) 4.23
Understand interspecies and habitat/species relationships to support forecasting resource stability and sustainability (RP 2) 4.23
Understand the status and trends of resource abundance and distribution through more accurate, timely and large-scale
assessments (RP 1) 4.20
Understand the response of coastal and marine systems to natural hazards and apply that understanding to assessments
of future vulnerability to natural hazards (RP 6) 4.13
Understand the impact of climate variability and change on the biogeochemistry of the ocean and implications for its
ecosystems (RP 12) 4.10
Apply understanding of natural and human caused processes to develop socioeconomic assessments and models to
evaluate the impact of multiple human uses on ecosystems (RP 15) 4.09
Understand ocean-climate interactions within and across regions (RP 11) 4.08
Apply understanding of the ocean to help project future climate changes and their impacts (RP 13) 4.04
Understand the interactions between marine operations and the environment (RP 8) 3.95
Understand how hazard events initiate and evolve and apply that understanding to improve forecasts of future hazard
events (RP 5) 3.95
Apply understanding to develop multi-hazard risk assessments and support development of models, policies, and
strategies for hazard mitigation (RP 7) 3.93
Apply advanced understanding and technologies to enhance the benefits of various natural resources from the open
ocean and coasts (RP 4) 3.88
Understand sources and processes contributing to ocean-related risks to human health (RP 17) 3.78
Understand human health risks associated with the ocean and the potential benefits of ocean resources to
human health (RP 18) 3.77
Understand how human use and valuation of ocean resources can be affected by ocean-borne human health threats and
how human activities can influence these threats (RP 19) 3.75
Apply understanding of environmental factors affecting marine operations to characterize and predict conditions in the
maritime domain (RP 9) 3.70
Apply understanding of ocean ecosystems and biodiversity to develop products and biological models to enhance
human well-being (RP 20) 3.68
Apply understanding of environmental impacts and marine operations to enhance the marine transportation system (RP 10) 3.55
* Average rating of importance according to survey respondents (1 = Very Low to 5 = Very High). Average rating for each theme is the computed
average rating of all research priorities within the given theme.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Survey Results
Average Rating of Ocean Research Priorities Plan Themes and Priorities
The following table describes each research priority from the Ocean Research Priorities Plan:
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 39/291
Survey Responses by State(Total Responses = 1,582)
Louisiana
30%
Florida
18%Texas
17%
Mississippi
15%
Alabama
11%
Other
6%
Mexico
3%
MASGC-08-007
This publication was supported by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the Florida Sea Grant Program, Louisiana Sea Grant
Program, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect
the views of those organizations.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Survey Results
Demographics and Occupational Interest
Occupational Interest (N = 1,358)
(Respondent could select up to three interest areas.) Number with Interest Percent with Interest
Improving Ecosystem Health 761 56%
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources 669 49%
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards 271 20%
Enabling Marine Operations, Business, and Commerce 267 20%
The Ocean’s Role in Climate 246 18%
Enhancing Human Health 198 15%
None of the Above 195 14%
For more information about the survey results, contact Steve Sempier at stephen.sempier@usm.edu
or visit http://masgc.org/gmrp.
Years of Experience (N = 1,207)
Average
Years
Total
Years
Use research as part of profession 10.60 9,994Conduct research 8.55 5,591
Administrate research 4.48 2,991
Total years reported 20,576
Survey Respondent Affiliation
to Research(Total Responses = 1,380)
Use as Part
of Profession
39%
Conduct Research
28%
Use for
Recreational
Purposes
13%
Do Not Use
Research
8%
Administrate
Research7%
Other
5%
Survey Responses by Affiliation(Total Responses = 1,486)
Education,
Higher Ed
34%
Government
State/County
18%
Business
and Industry
17%
Other
13%
Government
Federal12%
NGO
6%
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 40/291
County Level Results The Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs Survey results were examined on a county level. The average rating of each of the twenty Ocean Research Priority Plan (ORPP)
research
priorities
was
calculated
and
then
the
research
priorities
were
ranked
from highest to lowest priority according to each county. The average rating of the six ORPP societal themes were calculated based on the average rating of all research priorities that supported the societal theme. The societal themes were also ranked from highest to lowest for each county. The following figures provide the results of this analysis. Counties that had an N less than 3 were not included in the figures.
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 41/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
N
u m b e r o f R e s p o n s e s
1 0 1
‐ 1 2 0
8 1
‐ 1 0 0
4 1
‐ 8 0
2 1
‐ 4 0
1 1
‐ 2 0
3 ‐ 1 0
L e s s t h a n 3
G u l f o f M
e x i c o R e s e a r c h a n d I n f o r m a t i o n N
e e d s S u r v e y R e s
u l t s
N u m b e r o f
R e s p o n s e s b y C o
u n t y
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 42/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n k
i n g o
f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
S t e w a r d s
h i p o
f N a t u
r a l a n
d C u
l t u r a l
O c e a n
R e s o u r c e s
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 43/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n k
i n g o
f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
I n c r e a s
i n g
R e
s i l i e n c e t o N a t u r
a l H a z a r d s
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 44/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
E n a b l i n
g M a r i n e O p e r a t i o n s
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o
t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 45/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n k
i n g o
f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
T h e
O c e a n
ʹ
s R o
l e i n C l i m a t e
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 46/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n k
i n g o
f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
I m p r o v
i n g
E c o s y s t e m
H e a
l t h
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 47/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n k
i n g o
f O R P P S o c i
e t a l T h e m e :
E n
h a n
c i n g
H u m a n
H e a
l t h
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ( L o w
)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 48/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
T o p R a n k e d O R
P P S o c i e t a l T h e m
e b y C o u n t y
* I
n s o m e c a s e s a n i n v i d i d u a l c o u n t y
h a d m u l t i p l e t h e m e s t h a t w e r e t h e
t o p r a n k e d t h e m e d u e t o t i e s i n r a
n k i n g .
T h i s m a y h a v e i n c l u d e d
ʺ E c o s y s t e m
H e a l t h
ʺ ,
ʺ S t e w a r d s h i p o f R e s o u r c e
s ʺ , a n d / o r
ʺ O c e a n
ʹ s R o l e i n C l i m a t e
. ʺ
* *
C o u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s
w e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
T o p R a n k e d T h e m e
E c o s y s t e m
H e a l t h
O c e a n
ʹ
s R o l e i n C l i m a t e
S t e w a r d s h i p o f R e s o u r c e s
O t h e r o r S e v e r a l T h e m e ( s ) *
N o t r e p o r t e d * *
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 49/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k i n
g o
f O R P P R e s e a r c
h P r i o r i t y
1 :
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R e
l a t i v e R a n
k
N o t r e p o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w
)
U n
d e r s t a n
d t h e s
t a t u s a n d
t r e n
d s o
f r e s o u r c e a
b u n
d a n c e a n
d
d i s t r i b u
t i o n
t h r o u g
h m o r e a c c
u r a
t e ,
t i m e
l y a n d
s y n o p
t i c a s s e s s m
e n
t s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 50/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e
l a t i v e
R a n
k i n
g o
f O R P P R e s
e a r c
h P
r i o r i t y
2 :
* C o
u n t i e s w i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o t r e p o r t e d .
R
e l a t i v e
R a n
k
N o t r e p
o r t e
d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w
)
U n
d e r s
t a n
d i n t e r s p
e c i e s
a n
d h a
b i t a t / s p e c
i e s r e
l a t i o n s
h i p
s
t o s
u p
p o r t
f o r e c
a s
t i n g r e s
o u r c
e s
t a b i l i t y
a n
d s
u s
t a i n a
b i l i
t y
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 51/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 52/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P R e s e a r c h P r i o r i t y 4 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
A
p p l y a d v a n c e d u n d e r s t a n d i n g a n d t e c h n o l o g i e s
t o e n h a n c e t h e b e n e
f i t s o f v a r i o u s n a
t u r a l r e s o u r c e s
f r o m
t h e
o p e n o c e a n a n d c
o a s t s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 53/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P R e s e a r c h P r i o r i t y 5 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n
d e r s t a n d h o w h a
z a r d e v e n t s i n i t i
a t e a n d e v o l v e ,
a n d a p p l y t h a t
u n d e r s t a n d i n g t o i m p r o v e
f o r e c a s t s o f h a z a r d e v e n t s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 54/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P R e s e a r c h P r i o r i t y 6 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n d e r s t a n d t h e r e s p o n
s e o f c o a s t a l a n d
m a r i n e s y s t e m s t o
n
a t u r a l h a z a r d s a n
d a p p l y t h a t u n d
e r s t a n d i n g t o
a s s e
s s m e n t s o f f u t u r
e v u l n e r a b i l i t y t o
n a t u r a l h a z a r d s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 55/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P R e s e a r c h P r i o r i t y 7 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
A p
p l y u n d e r s t a n d i n g t o d e v e l o p m u
l t i ‐ h a z a r d r i s k
a s s e s s m e n t s a n d s u
p p o r t d e v e l o p m e n t o f m o d e l s ,
p o l i c i e s , a n d s t r
a t e g i e s f o r h a z a r d m i t i g a t i o n
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 56/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g o f O R P P R e s e a r c h P r i o r i t y 8 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n d e r s t a n d t h e
i n t e r a c t i o n s b e t w
e e n m a r i n e
o p e r a t i o n
s a n d t h e e n v i r o n
m e n t
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 57/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 58/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 0 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
A p p l y
u n d e r s t a n d i n g o
f e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t s a n d m a r i n e
o p e r
a t i o n s t o e n h a n c e t h e m a r i n e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 59/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 1 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n d e r s t a n d o
c e a n
‐ c l i m a t e i n t e r a c t i o n s
w i t h i n
a n d a c r o s s r e g i o
n s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 60/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 2 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n d e r s t a n d t h e
i m p a c t o f c l i m a t e v a r i a b i l i t y
a n d c h a n g e o
n t h e b i o g e o c h e m
i s t r y o f
t h e o c e a n a n d i m
p l i c a t i o n s f o r i t s e c o s y s t e m s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 61/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 3 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
A
p p l y u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e o c e a n t o h e l p p r o j e c t
f u t u r e c l i m a t e
c h a n g e s a n d t h e
i r i m p a c t s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 62/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 4 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U n d e r s t a n d a n d p r e d i c t t h e i m p a c t
o f n a t u r a l a n d
a n t h r o p o g e n i c p r o c e s s e s o n e c
o s y s t e m s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 63/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 5 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
A p p l y u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f
n a t u r a l a n d a n t h
r o p o g e n i c p r o c e s s e s
t o d
e v e l o p s o c i o e c o n
o m i c a s s e s s m e n t s a n d m o d e l s t o
e v a l u a
t e t h e i m p a c t o f m u l t i p l e h u m a n u s e s o n e c o s y s t e m
s
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 64/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 65/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 7 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U
n d e r s t a n d s o u r c
e s a n d p r o c e s s e s
c o n t r i b u t i n g
t o o c e a n
‐ r e l a
t e d r i s k s t o h u m a n h e a l t h
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 66/291
−
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0
M i l e s
R e l a t i v e R a n k i n g
o f O R P P R e s e a r
c h P r i o r i t y 1 8 :
* C o
u n
t i e s w
i t h < 3 s u r v e y r e s p o n s e s w
e r e n o
t r e p o r t e
d .
R e l a t i v e R a n k
N o t r e p o r t e d *
1 ( H i g h )
2 3 4 5 6 ‐
1 0
1 1
‐ 1 5
1 6
‐ 2 0 ( L o w )
U
n d e r s t a n d h u m a
n h e a l t h r i s k s a s
s o c i a t e d w i t h
t h e o c e a n a n d t h e p o t e n t i a l b e
n e f i t s o f
o c e a n r e s o
u r c e s t o h u m a n h e a l t h
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 67/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 68/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 69/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 70/291
Comments Organized by ORPP Themes and Research Priorities
ORPP Theme: Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Resources
General Comments for Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Resources
Fisheries
resources
Though covered under more general priorities, fisheries‐specific priorities will be important and
remain at the forefront, both the eyes of the general public (i.e., consumers) and commercial and
recreational interests (i.e., economic interests)
RP1: Understand status and trends of resource abundance and distribution through assessments
Stock assessments and fish ecology/biology
Understand the dynamics between fisheries trophic levels and fisheries and the environment
Fisheries biology and management (i.e. shark conservation) especially in trophic level research
Fisheries ecology, population structure and change, stock abundance, distribution of fish
resources and resource use, fish movements, predator prey interactions, interactions among
species
The impact of human pressures and global warming on parasite and diseases of commercial
resources and its impact on their sustainability
Effects of loop current on recruitment of offshore spawning juvenile fish species into estuaries
Long term trends in abundance/recruitment and relation to physical variables
Complete and aggressive biodiversity inventories in the open Gulf, deep Gulf, and marginal
estuaries and lagoons. This is critical if the rate of change in the Gulf reflects the rate of
anthropogenic change on the Gulf coast
Natural biomass variability within the region (similar to short term climate variability) ‐‐ can you
separate naturally occurring variability from anthropogenic influences Develop a long term strategy of monitoring of biodiversity (along with environmental change)
Improvements to fishery assessments
We need better, more reliable, information of marine life populations and methods to
protect/manage pressured species. When I hear position papers I feel that it is all ʺspinʺwritten
by advocates of that particular ʺsideʺ of the issue. I wonder if anyone knows the real truth of the
issues
Particular attention should be paid to ecosystem‐ based approaches to fisheries research and
management
Ecosystem based management of fisheries
Effects of
coastal
erosion
on
future
Gulf
of
Mexico
marine
fisheries
species
Fisheries impacts from ecosystem collapse in Louisiana
Better understand the life history info needed for more effective fisheries management in the long
term. For example, the lack of knowledge for some of our more important species ... red snapper
... is pathetic
Bluefin tuna spawning aggregations
Enhanced research on fisheries (primarily snappers/groupers) that fall within both state and
federal management jurisdictions
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 71/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 72/291
Sustainability and socioeconomic topics
Sustainable use of resources and respective commercial readjustments relative to predicted
supplies and demands
Conservation of marine resources, and regulation of fishing industry to allow a sustainable
fishery. Conservation, not exploitation
Ascertaining that stocks of wild fish for human consumption are self‐sustaining
Enhancing
and
promoting
sustainable
fisheries
Overfishing
Overfishing of certain gamefish, specifically Yellowfin Tuna. Red snapper
research on sustainable fisheries
We need to continue our research in the areas of fisheries sustainability and improved water
quality which may be interwoven within Improving Ecosystem Health and Enhancing Human
Health issues
Economically and biologically sustainable Gulf fisheries
The highest priority should be sustainable fisheries in a changing global climate
sustainable fishing practices
Assessment of fishing pressure
ECOSYSTEM analysis The use of MPAs (Marine protected areas) sustainable fishing practices
Understand the connectiveness at different time and space scales to understand processes that
define life on Earth. Evaluate the role of the marginal seas in the human scale, describing
gradients that can lead to understand how to achieve sustainability in resources of interest to
humankind
We need to continue our research in the areas of fisheries sustainability
Create sustainable fish stocks
Sustainable sportsfishing species, spotted seatrout hatcheries
Factors impacting resource abundance and distribution
Investigation of hypoxic area that can cause fish and invertebrate kills harmful to commercial and
recreational fishing and to overall ecosystem health
Impacts of harmful algal blooms
Pollution affecting commercial fisheries
RP2: Understand interspecies and habitat/species relationships to support forecasting resource stability
and sustainability
Habitat and relationship to resources
Marsh and Estuary Production (fish, shrimp, crabs, ducks, alligators, birds...)
Fringe
habitat
‐‐character
and
importance
to
overall
ecosystem
health
Defining Essential Habitats
Mostly has been addressed...but we need a comprehensive vulnerability assessment (esp. in
relation to sea level rise) conducted that incorporates conservation strategies of declining habitat
types and species
Improved understanding of the ecological importance of freshwater inflow to Texas estuaries.
Scientific documentation of the ecological importance of non‐tidal coastal wetlands in Texas,
especially those whose hydrologic connections are not obvious Improved understanding of
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 73/291
seagrasses in Texas‐ trends, human impacts, management (role of water quality protection‐ TSS,
nutrients)
Comprehensive analysis the relationship between estuarine systems and the ocean resources that
depend on them
How has increased human population density and habitat modification in the coastal zone
affected estuarine habitats and estuarine‐dependent species?
The
importance
of
the
health
and
overfishing
of
the
estuaries,
inland
bays
and
waterways
that
feed the Gulf of Mexico, and how they in turn impact the entire Gulf system
Wetlands preservation
Deep‐sea habitats and exploration
The land‐sea margin and especially the role of tidal rivers in maintaining estuarine and marine
productivity should be a very high research priority
Fringe habitat ‐‐ character and importance to overall ecosystem health
Research on the Enhancement of Alabamaʹs Gulf Coast Fisheries by Development of Artificial
Reefs should be evaluated
Establishing and evaluating the benefits of Marine Protected Areas, especially no‐take Marine
Reserves, with respect to protecting ecosystems, improving fisheries, and increasing our
knowledge and understanding of marine systems. Improving design of MPAs and Marine
Reserves and networks of both
What are the natural production mechanisms in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Mexico
Understanding Biological processes on the Ecosystem level
ECOSYSTEM analysis
Energy production infrastructures that enhance marine harvesting potential
Developing strategies for enhanced seafood production through ecosystem enhancement and
aquaculture
Interspecies relationships
Research on ecosystem resilience and the effects of removal of single, targeted commercially popular species from ecosystem. For instance, what is predicted effect of removal of top
predators (sharks)? What is predicted effect of removal of large quantities of forage fish, which
are also filter feeders (menhaden)?
Microbiological symbiotic interactions
Investigate chemolithotrophic bacterial activity in the Gulf as it serves as a nutritional resource
for higher trophic levels
Better understand trophic transfer in coastal marine systems
Develop an understanding on factors that affect methane cycling in the hydrocarbon seep zone as
bacterial methane consumption essentially serves as a bottom‐up food resource and removes
methane from
seawater
Connection between ecosystems and regions (i.e. circulation, gene flow)
Stressors and relationship to species population/behavior
Evaluate interactions between natural and anthropogenic stressors at the individual and
population levels
Natural biomass variability within the region (similar to short term climate variability) ‐‐ can you
separate naturally occurring variability from anthropogenic influences
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 74/291
The number one priority for effective ecosystem‐ based management would be estimating food
web structure and human impacts on it and communities in general. Understanding the physics
of the system, as well as characterizing Gulf‐wide benthic habitats (via sonar applications
followed by ground truthing of sediments) is critical to that goal
Interaction between Gulf of Mexico and estuaries through physical forcing, nutrients and trophic
exchange
Anoxia
in
the
gulf
and
impact
on
marine
animals
How do harmful algal blooms affect fisheries and entire food webs?
The two main priorities should be eutrophication and habitat loss
Monitoring the changes in water temperature of the gulf and its impact on the impact on the
ecosystem biodiversity
Fish migration route changes due to ocean and Gulf of Mexico temperature changes. How do
short‐term (episodic) forcings of the ocean influence the transport of nutrients, species, and
pollutants
Deep water investigations of methane hydrate bearing geologic structures particularly ecosystem
health and diversity, and potential large scale disassociation of hydrates that could impact
continental shelf integrity (e.g. slumps and slides dangerous to deep‐water oil exploration) or
trigger massive methane releases to the atmosphere
Global warming effects on whales migrations routes
Invasive species
Aquatic Invasive Species ‐ Biofouling ‐ Ballast water ‐Mariculture
Marine transportation of aquatic invasives. Better understanding of the connections between
Gulf Ecosystem with that of the coastal zone and the impact continued population growth with
have and the potential solutions
General biosurveys ‐who is there INVASIVE SPECIES!! ‐ (including introduction and monitoring
and prevention) organismal interactions ‐ on individual scale and ecological scale
Are invasive (non resident) species increasing in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and is this the result of anthropogenic activities? Have the >4000 oil/gas platforms contributed to this increase? What
will the effect of these species be on GOM marine/estuarine communities?
estuarine invasive species
Need to evaluate the risk of invasive species affecting aquatic animal populations
effects of invasives on native ecosystems
invasive species
Marine bioinvasions
Prevention, management, and impact of invasive species
RP3: Understand
human
‐use
patterns
that
influence
resource
stability
Economics
research about the economic impacts of recreational and commercial fishing and management
plans based on the benefits for the greatest number of people
More focus should be paid to the social and economic impacts
socio‐economic studies & forecasts of the energy industry in the western Gulf of Mexico 4) socio‐
economic studies of the marine transportation industry in the western Gulf of Mexico 5) socio‐
economic studies of the fishing industry in the western Gulf of Mexico
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 75/291
An understanding of the ecosystem services that the GOM provides and then valuation of those
services
Estimate the value and sustainable use of commercial and recreational fishery resources
Value the benefit received by ecosystems of the Gulf of Mexico so we can communicate its value
to citizens (users). Also this estimates can be used in decision‐making processes
Establishing and evaluating the benefits of Marine Protected Areas, especially no‐take Marine
Reserves, with
respect
to
enhancing
non
‐consumptive
activities
Develop a catalog of options for mitigating human development, including costs and anticipated
benefits
Economically and biologically sustainable Gulf fisheries
Need ways to translate data into information, i.e., connect the dots. Need more integrated
studies where natural and social science are connected
Recreational uses
Research showing effects of small charter boat operators and other recreational consumers efforts
like reef building
Sustainable and low impact recreation activities
Favoritism of the commercial fishing sector over recreational fishing when setting catch quota
and size limits. Unbiased research on economic valuation of commercial vs. recreation fishing
impacts.
Determine the number of private boat recreational fishers. Determine the frequency, number,
and date of private boat recreational trips. Determine the species targeted, the species caught, the
pounds per species harvested, gear type, and the location of harvest of private boat recreational
fishers
Understanding the balance between recreational and commercial uses of marine resources
Stakeholders and Cultural resources
Research finding a way that the resource is not given to a select few people/entities for exploitation while other users are banned from the resource
In depth studies on the human environments and stake holders who use the Gulf of Mexico
resources
Preservation of Cultural Groups who are indigent to the Gulf and engage in Commercial Fishing
and rely on the Gulf waters for subsistence
livelihoods of coastal people
Public use and access issues related to the Gulf
While cultural resources were mentioned, it might be more explicitly stated that prehistoric and
historic sites are threatened by rising sea levels and by the destruction of marshlands that
previously protected
the
sites
from
hurricanes
and
other
destructive
weather
events.
This
damage should be mitigated
conflicts between marine conservation and marine resource dependent communities
Social vulnerability of populations living along the coast
We need to focus on water access and how changing coastal demographics are affecting marine‐
related industries in the near term
I feel that often the understanding of biological systems takes precedent over the understanding
of human systems. More funding needs to be put in to understanding the human systems
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 76/291
RP4: Apply understanding and technology to enhance benefits of various natural resources
Aquaculture
Once the National Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2007 passes Congress, offshore aquaculture will
become a high research priority. The NMFS Southeast Regional Office is already gearing up to
submit their plan for the Gulf and implement regulations in 2008
Mariculture
aquaculture
Offshore aquaculture
alternatives to natural fisheries (i.e. aquaculture)
Lacks inclusion of key attributes for seafood production, commerce and utilization, and related
aquaculture development
Increasing productivity via aquaculture
Develop husbandry technologies for declining marine species
Develop sustainable aquaculture to minimize negative impact on receiving streams from
aquaculture operations and to reduce fishing process
Development of stock enhancement program
Developing strategies for enhanced seafood production through ecosystem enhancement and
aquaculture
Open ocean aquaculture and the political economy and ecology of development in the EEZ in
light of above comments
Development of ecologically sustainable fish farming in the Gulf of Mexico
Stock enhancement
Offshore Aquaculture Development of a marine aquaculture industry to relieve
pressure/overfishing on the wild fishery
NOAA is looking at the potential of offshore aquaculture both in context with oil structures and
away from such structures. There is a potential for significant research in siting, operating and
production of seafood at offshore aquaculture sites and it is important that Sea Grant continue to fund the development of new species and technologies for production and environmental
protection in this area. Having a regional planning project for aquaculture and identification of
optimum offshore aquaculture sites is a critical component of this work
The impacts of mariculture in shallow warm waters
Different species used in sea farming‐helpful or harmful to the area?
Open ocean aquaculture and the political economy and ecology of development in the EEZ in
light of above comments
Evaluate the potential for fisheries enhancement to restore depleted fisheries
Traditional energy
sources
offshore oil and gas resources
forecasts of the energy industry in the western Gulf of Mexico
Find ways to safely and cleanly increase energy raw materials form the seas
Need to conduct a comprehensive assessment or risk analysis to determine how society, physical
environment and organisms will be affected by climate change along the Gulf Coast (winners,
neutrals and losers??) Factor in change in energy use, supply and human demographics
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 77/291
We need better information about the effects of an LNG facility in the Gulf of Mexico. When I
hear position papers I feel that it is all ʺspinʺwritten by advocates of that particular ʺsideʺ of the
issue. I wonder if anyone knows the real truth of the issues
Impact of off‐shore drilling and development
The DEAD ZONE. This situation is not being addressed, yet ʺenvironmental concernsʺwhich
have limited if any negative effects are being employed to modify and control the development
of needed
industrial
complexes.
The
possible
use
of
wide
spread
aeration
of
much
of
the
DEAD
ZONE, as a byproduct of the use of energy generation, has not been effectively evaluated or
presented for consideration
implications of global petroleum production peaking (Hubbertʹs Peak)
Unbiased research on impacts of other commercial marine enterprises on marine resources. i.e.
LNG plants, petro exploration and transport, dredging activities, etc
offshore oil and gas resources
Uses for off‐shore drilling rigs once they are not in commercial use
implications of global petroleum production peaking (Hubbertʹs Peak)
Not including FL in oil industry reparation contracts shows gross lack of understanding of Gulf
circulation;
Alternative Energy
Understanding the potential to use the Gulf for sustainable production of energy, i.e.: wind, wave
energy, et al. (other than gas/oil production)
Potential to use currents in deep‐water ship channels and ports to generate renewable electricity
Deep water investigations of methane hydrate bearing geologic structures particularly potential
as an energy resource, and potential large scale disassociation of hydrates that could impact
continental shelf integrity (e.g. slumps and slides dangerous to deep‐water oil exploration) or
trigger massive methane releases to the atmosphere
Opportunities for alternate forms of energy ‐ e.g. wind resources
Effects (cost/benefit) of wind farms in the Gulf The use of the continental shelf as a platform for wind generated electricity is a very viable option
for the Gulf coast states as there is a readily available work force and technology capable of off
shore construction on a large scale. There should be significant effort put into: 1) selection of
locations for wind farms that are most effective for the wind patterns of the area. 2) Couple this
information with the existing electrical distribution and use. 3) Study the environmental effects
on migrating birds and aquatic life. This is an important opportunity for the scientific
community to get in front of the industrial applications. It would be pro‐active to be a partner in
this process and actually help drive it, as an advocate rather than waiting for industrial users to
feel the wrath of making choices that may not be what the scientific community feels are correct.
Further, what
ever
decision
the
industrial
community
makes,
should
be
based
on
sound
basic
research
Explore the potential for sustainable low impact energy production (wave or wind) from the
GOM
Biotechnology and Value‐added
other biotech resources besides medically related
There should also be greater emphasis placed on seeking out alternative methods of waste
treatment that is more eco‐friendly. I would like to see major effort placed on research to convert
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 78/291
algae and other seafood by‐product into bio‐diesel fuels, omega‐3 fatty acids and organic
fertilizers
Increased utilization of potential human food resources from marine environments.
Development and application of current and novel technologies to increase value of seafoods,
including underutilized species and by‐catch from current fisheries
Coastal Engineering for Sustainability: Apply knowledge and tools to coastal issues to enhance
productivity and
sustainability
while
providing
for
human
needs
Seafood Technology should be a high priority when developing ocean research priorities ‐ not
only environmental biology and other such disciplines, just because resource managers and
administrators want to support their own disciplines
ORPP Theme: Increase Resilience to Natural Hazards
RP5: Understand how hazard events initiate and evolve and apply that understanding to improve
forecasts of future hazard events
Characterization of the Gulf Loop Current and its impacts/effects on tropical and sub‐tropical
events, including hurricanes
Improve forecasts of storm surge and wind associated with tropical storms
Oceanographic anomalies relation with hurricane trajectories and frequency
Increased hurricane activity due to changes caused by global warming
Role in Hurricane generation and intensification, particularly the Loop Current Improved
hurricane modeling using ocean feedback. Ocean data collection needs to go up by a factor of at
least ten...for starters
Better monitoring of the Gulfʹs temperature variations and circulations to help predict storm
movement patterns with more in‐place buoy’s for temperature measurements and wave velocities and heights
Forecast the landfall intensity of hurricanes
Needed are major improvements in hurricane intensity forecasts
The basics of water molecular movement in the waves and the effects of the wind forces on the
development of wave dynamics particularly as it develops in storm surges
Hurricanes
Storm surge
Erosion
weather events
earthquakes
RP6: Understand response of coastal and marine systems to natural hazards and apply
understanding to assessments of future vulnerability to natural hazards
General comments
forecasting storm impacts
The impact of the development of Barrier Islands and their impact on Gulf Currents and tidal
flow and itʹs nutrients
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 79/291
BARRIER ISLANDS AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION????
Restoration of wetlands to absorb energy from storms and protect water quality
Development of seamless bathymetric‐topographic datasets for use with coastal
inundation/storm surge modeling and prediction
Coast profile alteration by hurricanes
Sediment mobilization, transport and deposition in major storm events
The
fate/movement
of
sediment
in
near
‐shore
environments.
How
does
sediment
transport
effect
the near shore environment along the Gulf Coast (and not just within state lines)
Improved methods of evaluating cross‐shelf and along‐shelf sediment transport under both
storm and non‐storm conditions so as to better predict sediment impacts on benthic habitats
Bottom sediment mapping and coastal wetland accretion/erosion trends
Freshwater resources to bays and estuaries Loss of sediment transport from river
impoundments which results in increased erosion and habitat loss
Coastal Wetland Loss or Shoreline Retreat Hurricane Protection
Land Loss Risk Analysis ‐ Assess and identify potential risk of land loss across the Gulf coastal
region. This is important for both coastal residents and coastal restoration programs
No mention of periodic over flow of Mississippi river to build up wetlands. Similar to controlling
Niagara River for tourism by controlled out flow. This will help navigation & wetlands in place
of either or approach. We need both navigation for commerce and wetlands for storm protection
Affects of estuaries on GOM stability and recovery from natural disasters
Establishment of barriers to buffet storm impacts
Research on natural protective features of coastal resources (beaches, dunes, wetlands) to
enhance resilience
Most have been well‐addressed. However, I think the role of coastal forests in storm
amelioration and as habitat for coastal and migratory wildlife is an important part of the Gulf
ecosystem
Resilience and role of coastal salt and freshwater wetlands in ecology and biochemical cycling.
Healthy, abundant coastal wetland complexes most likely play a crucial role in mitigating effects of climate change and disturbance. Yet these resources (especially isolated freshwater wetlands)
are being destroyed for development at an alarming rate since the Cook County supreme court
ruling
Research needs to not be so focused on just the environmental impacts such as climate changes.
These changes are so long term they do not relate to existing dangers from pollution and hazard
mitigation after storm events and these are more immediate needs
Interaction between Gulf of Mexico and estuaries through physical forcing, nutrients and trophic
exchange. Influence of freshwater inflow on GOM estuaries and carbon transport onto the
continental shelf
Positive
and
Negative
impacts
(e.g.,
biological,
ecological,
flooding,
droughts,
and
geophysical)
of Tropical Cyclones that enter the Gulf of Mexico
Erosion/Subsidence
Coastal erosion to our coast line reduces our storm surge protection
Effects of land subsidence (especially in Louisiana
Coastal Erosion, Marsh Loss
Beach erosion
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 80/291
Understanding the causes of coastal erosion and development of strategies and programs to
respond to erosional events
Coastal erosion and freshwater diversion inter‐relationship
Effects of coastal erosion on future Gulf of Mexico marine fisheries species
subsidence, wetland loss, beach erosion
Stop Louisiana coastal erosion, and rebuild barrier islands. If they can build islands with dredges
in the
Middle
East
and
build
cities
on
them
I believe
we
can
start
building
barrier
islands
with
dredges. Letʹs quit putting money into studies with a bunch of words for PhD’s, buy a couple of
dredges, probably save money and dictionaries and start working up and down the coast making
land. Hurricanes are going to take while we make so it will be a permanent process
Specific erosion studies and action. All I see is talk, talk, talk. I have used the Bayou Lafourche
resource for years and I see no conservation efforts, much less their results
Subsidence and loss of critical wetland habitats
Coastal erosion and hurricane vulnerability in Louisiana
subsidence rates
Understanding the causes of coastal erosion and development of strategies and programs to
respond to erosional events
Coastal land loss, sediment availability, estuarine invasive species,
subsidence, wetland loss, beach erosion
Coastal land loss, sediment availability, large‐scale coastal restoration
shrinking coast line, what can be done to minimize the damage
coastal subsidence
Land Loss Risk Analysis ‐ Assess and identify potential risk of land loss across the Gulf coastal
region. This is important for both coastal residents and coastal restoration programs
Marsh Loss
Arresting continuing land loss in TX, LA, MS
Address the Louisiana coastal land loss problem through restoration projects
coastal erosion and accretion Erosion of the coast lines
Understanding the causes of coastal erosion and development of strategies and programs to
respond to erosional events
accretion/erosion trends
Bottom sediment mapping and coastal wetland accretion/erosion trends
Remediation of coastal erosion by means other than bulkheads or seawalls
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 81/291
RP7: Apply understanding to develop multi‐hazard risk assessments and support development of
models, policies, and strategies for hazard mitigation
General comments
More focus should be paid to the social and economic impacts as well
storm surge dynamics
Understand
short
and
long
‐term
demographic
changes
resulting
from
hurricanes,
oil
spills,
harmful algal blooms, etc
Protection of communities & infrastructure from storm surges
Coastal hazard assessment and mitigation
Impacts of marine debris on navigational safety and fishing grounds. This could be rolled up
into one of the larger theme areas presented already
Developing combined physical, ecological and socioeconomic modeling capabilities to assess the
overall effects of coastal restoration and hurricane protection projects
While cultural resources were mentioned, it might be more explicitly stated that prehistoric and
historic sites are threatened by rising sea levels and by the destruction of marshlands that
previously protected the sites from hurricanes and other destructive weather events. This
damage should be mitigated
Social vulnerability of populations living along the coast. Development of social capital in
conjunction with coastal resilience to natural hazards
Communications and behavior change research, especially related to hazard mitigation and
development activities
tidal and storm surge modeling updated elevation data (heights/depths) for intertidal coastal
areas shoreline maps referenced to multiple vertical datums
Another piece that is not mentioned is research regarding innovations in financial markets and
financial products and the environment. (Iʹm going out on a limb here, but something to think
about). There are innovations in financial products, such as catastrophe bonds, weather
derivatives, futures etc ‐ that create money flows and investments in areas that relate to Gulf of Mexico issues. This is not something that is never discussed in meetings of academics and policy
people ‐ is this something worth exploring?
Understanding the factors that impact community resiliency against natural hazards, developing
measurable indicators of resiliency
Development of high resolution coastal physical and ecosystem models that can address natural
variability, extreme events and climatic changes and support long term observational monitoring
networks for model validation
Removal of high priced real estate further inland to avoid direct hurricane impact
HURRICANE PROTECTION for the COASTLINE!!!
continued
study
of
environmental
impacts
from
Katrina
Development of social capital in conjunction with coastal resilience to natural hazards
Communications and behavior change research, especially related to hazard mitigation and
development activities
Need ways to translate data into information, i.e., connect the dots. Need more integrated
studies where natural and social science are connected
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 82/291
Fish industry
Continue to collect data on hurricane impacts to Gulf fishing communities
Effects of hurricanes to the gulf coast region to our seafood industryʹ
Marine debris
Ecosystem and societal impacts of marine debris from coastal storms
Impacts
of
marine
debris
to
fisheries,
habitat,
and
navigation
ORPP Theme: Enabling Marine Operations
RP8: Understand interactions between marine operations and the environment
Marine Operations and Ecosystem Health
Further research to assess the potential impacts of oil exploration on eastern Gulf of Mexico
communities
influence of petroleum industry on GoM ecosystems
The effects of removing non operational oil platforms on fish and invertebrate population
densities
Mitigate environmental pollution both from ships and oil rigs
Specifically, Evaluate potential threats to ecosystem health from oil drilling
Impact of oil production facilities and processes
Impact of off‐shore drilling and development
Sea Floor subsidence due to the extraction of oil and gas from the Gulf of Mexico
Effects of ʺonce through coolingʺ and ʺopen systemʺ cooling systems associated with active (and
proposed) power plants and LNG plants along coastal estuaries and shallow near‐shore gulf
environments
Open Loop Liquefied Natural Gas Plants and their effect on the fish, water quality, and other living organisms (coral, crustaceans, etc.)
LNG processing terminals. Issues with oil and gas infrastructure (aging pipelines, etc.) and oil
and gas spill PREVENTION
Research should be addressed to the cumulative affects of numerous off shore problems, pitfalls,
and advantages of desalination plants
Clean Vessel and Barge Operations; Clean Marine Terminal Operations;
Energy production infrastructures that enhance marine harvesting potential
Ocean noise impacts to marine mammals and other fauna and flora
Invasive Species
Biofouling ‐ Ballast water
Are invasive (non resident) species increasing in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and is this the result
of anthropogenic activities? Have the >4000 oil/gas platforms contributed to this increase? What
will the effect of these species be on GOM marine/estuarine communities?
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 83/291
Navigation
Louisiana has paid the highest environmental price of any state to support the national interest in
navigation. Navigation from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico is possible via Louisiana. The
tremendous erosion rate of the bird foot delta is directly attributable to dredging at the Head of
Passes. However, there seems to be very little research into the responsibility of the navigation
industry for these problems, and in fact, the navigation industry resists virtually any effort to
minimize impacts
or
use
dredged
material
beneficially.
Research
into
the
cause
and
effect
relationship between past and present navigation practices and current land loss/erosion
problems as well as research into methods to minimize impacts and use spoil beneficially would
be helpful
Aquaculture Siting
NOAA is looking at the potential of offshore aquaculture both in context with oil structures and
away from such structures. There is a potential for significant research in siting, operating and
production of seafood at offshore aquaculture sites and it is important that Sea Grant continue to
fund the development of new species and technologies for production and environmental
protection in this area. Having a regional planning project for aquaculture and identification of
optimum offshore aquaculture sites is a critical component of this work
RP9: Apply understanding of environmental factors affecting marine operations to characterize and
predict conditions in the maritime domain
Impacts of marine debris on navigational safety and fishing grounds. This could be rolled up
into one of the larger theme areas presented already
Impacts of marine debris to fisheries, habitat, and navigation
Researching better ways to transport high‐value resources to market that will withstand natural
storm related damages to existing structures
Need improved wind field measurements and expansion of HF radar technologies to drive numerical models for ocean circulation and improve weather forecasts
RP10: Apply understanding of environmental impacts and marine operations to enhance the marine
transportation system
socio‐economic studies of the marine transportation industry in the western Gulf of Mexico
No mention of periodic over flow of Mississippi river to build up wetlands. Similar to controlling
Niagara River for tourism by controlled out flow. This will help navigation & wetlands in place
of either or approach. We need both navigation for commerce and wetlands for storm protection
We
need
to
focus
on
water
access
and
how
changing
coastal
demographics
are
affecting
marine
‐
related industries in the near term
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 84/291
ORPP Theme: The Oceanʹs Role in Climate
RP11: Understand ocean‐climate interactions within and across regions
Sea level change
Sea level change, both worldwide (eustatic) and local
The
effects
of
sea
level
rise
due
to
climate
change
The
effects
of
the
reduction
of
artic
ice
and
the
reduction of glaciers
Impact of global warming and rising sea level on both natural and man‐made coastal systems
Efforts involving climate change studies and particularly, regional research that models coastal
subsidence and sea level rise
Global water‐ balance (sea‐level rise), change in water currents or temperature and the global
impact. See the Gulf of Mexico as part of the big system
(1) Probable effects of climate‐change induced changes in the rate of sea level rise on coastal
development in general and public infrastructure in particular. (2) Cost‐effective adaptive
strategies for contending with (1). (3) Vulnerability data needed to accomplish #1, especially
topographic elevation data at intervals of no more than 1 ft.
Air‐sea‐land interface/interactions and ocean circulation
Incorporate the air‐sea‐land interaction when studying effects of climate change
Understanding marine and coastal meteorology in the Gulf of Mexico and the Houston‐
Galveston metropolitan area. Atmospheric and coastal and marine surface exchange of moisture,
heat, momentum, and pollutants are of great interest to understand the natural processes
involving the ecosystem subject to climate change
Climate change and potential impacts on ocean currents
Physics of air‐sea‐land interaction
Thermohaline circulation
Study Ocean oscillations effects on the Gulf coast and Eastern sea‐ board
To get ocean circulation and overturning correct, we need better research models of ocean‐
atmosphere interaction than NOAA can run operationally. Without better atmospheric forcing
models than NOAA runs operationally, we will not get the Gulf of Mexico circulation right
Need for detailed bottom mapping to include bottom lithology & geochemistry, sediment type,
and associated habitats. This baseline would then be used to assess the responses to upland
watershed change dynamics, near‐shore and estuary trends, and coastal response to sea‐level
change
Large‐scale high‐quality multidisciplinary hydrographic surveys (WOCE‐style) to better
understand the role of GOM in forming of Gulf Stream waters and its response to climate change
RP12: Understand the impact of climate variability and change on the biogeochemistry of the ocean and
implication for its ecosystems
The impact global warming on parasite and diseases of commercial resources and its impact on
their sustainability
Understanding in the impact of global climate change of coral reefs in the Gulf of Mexico
Studies on invasive species that may appear as the result of warming water of Gulf
Fish migration route changes due to ocean and Gulf of Mexico temperature changes
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 85/291
The role of climate change on the structure and function of marine communities, including
predator‐prey interactions
Sea level rise effects on coastal ecosystems
Effects of Gulf warming on pelagic food webs
The relationship between factors considered to contribute to global warming and the effects they
have on GOM pH. This is very important!!!
The
highest
priority
should
be
sustainable
fisheries
in
a changing
global
climate
We need to carbon‐ balance the GOM region: how much carbon is entering through rivers and
leaving through air‐sea exchange and ocean circulation. This would allow us to answer basic
questions like: Is the GOM a regional sink or source of C? What processes control the
magnitude of C fluxes within the GOM region?
Climate studies also should have a lower priority unless it involves carbon sequestration, because
climate studies ultimately are just scientific speculation and not applied science
Development of high resolution coastal physical and ecosystem models that can address natural
variability, extreme events and climatic changes and support long term observational monitoring
networks for model validation
Understanding how land use change within river basins associated with the Gulf affect the
biological integrity and climatic roles of the Gulf
All sounded important. The most important is to assess climate change and how it will affect the
life in the Gulf of Mexico. Also, when is development of the coastal zone unsustainable?
How the reduction of fresh water will effect Ocean environments
Resilience and role of coastal salt and freshwater wetlands in ecology and biochemical cycling.
Healthy, abundant coastal wetland complexes most likely play a crucial role in mitigating effects
of climate change and disturbance. Yet these resources (especially isolated freshwater wetlands)
are being destroyed for development at an alarming rate since the Cook County supreme court
ruling
Development of high resolution coastal physical and ecosystem models that can address natural
variability, extreme events and climatic changes and support long term observational monitoring networks for model validation
How do short‐term (episodic) forcings of the ocean influence the transport of nutrients, species,
and pollutants? How does this repositioning of materials contribute to the climate of the Gulf of
Mexico, and how important are the variations in this climate
Future fate of coastal ecosystems in lieu of sea level rise and other related climate change
elements (focus on coastal and not marine)
RP13: Apply understanding of the ocean to help project future climate changes and their impacts
Impacts to
Humans
Biological community changes resulting from climate change and its effects on coastal landscapes
Mississippi River discharge and sedimentation rates affecting the hypoxic zone and what
climatological affects are potentially spawned by such events
The effects of climate change on coastal and marine ecosystems‐‐with an eye to effects on natural
and human communities
effects of Climate change on coastal ecosystems and the development of mitigation strategies for
the Gulf of Mexico
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 86/291
Impact of predicted climate change on coastal communities and ecosystems (maybe included in
previous in different words)
Need to evaluate how wetlands will change with climate change and appropriate restoration
strategies for now and into the future
Humans within the coastal ecosystem as a factor of change and response to alterations resulting
from climate change
Probable
effects
of
climate
‐change
induced
changes
in
the
rate
of
sea
level
rise
on
coastal
development in general and public infrastructure in particular. (2) Cost‐effective adaptive
strategies for contending with #1. (3) Vulnerability data needed to accomplish #1, especially
topographic elevation data at intervals of no more than 1 ft
If during the next 15 years there a more immediate sea level rise caused by sooner than
anticipated by shifts and sloughing of the ice sheet in western Antarctica, there would be very
serious impacts on the barrier islands (e.g., Horn Island, MS would cease to exist), tidal marshes
(diking would curtail reestablishment of tidal marshes into the lower flood plains adjacent to the
mouths of rivers, etc
Most scientists understand the risks associated with the melting of our polar regions. Increases in
sea level is going to have a profound affect on our coastal areas, cities and communities,
transportation and shipping infrastructure, and on our natural resources such as our drinking
water aquifers that lie along coastal regions. Fresh water is a natural resource that is already
shrinking in volume as new stressors are placed upon in by increasing needs by rural, urban,
industrial, and agricultural users. Influxes of users migrating into the interior regions of the
country caused by displacement along our coastlines due to rising sea levels will have a profound
and long term affect on our countryʹs ability to cope and assimilate the masses. This issue needs
to be addressed while we have the flexibility of time to examine alternative methodologies to
prepare for this eventuality. This is a short‐ , and long‐term planning need that is currently
receiving very little attention
Need to conduct a comprehensive assessment or risk analysis to determine how society, physical
environment and organisms will be affected by climate change along the Gulf Coast (winners, neutrals and losers??) Factor in change in energy use, supply and human demographics. Need
to develop ecosystem models to support climate change scenarios and current scenarios.
Development of Integrated Ocean Observing Systems and their related technologies for long
range and long term monitoring of the ocean environment as well as quantitatively measuring
the impacts of climate change and human interaction
Research needs to not be so focused on just the environmental impacts such as climate changes.
These changes are so long term they do not relate to existing dangers from pollution and hazard
mitigation after storm events and these are more immediate needs
While cultural resources were mentioned, it might be more explicitly stated that prehistoric and
historic sites
are
threatened
by
rising
sea
levels
and
by
the
destruction
of
marshlands
that
previously protected the sites from hurricanes and other destructive weather events. This
damage should be mitigated
Additional work in the area of mitigating climate change
Impact of predicted climate change on coastal communities and ecosystems (maybe included in
previous in different words)
Need ways to translate data into information, i.e., connect the dots. Need more integrated
studies where natural and social science are connected
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 87/291
Impact of climate change (natural and humans/built environment)
Storm risk and its relation to climate change
I think that increase water temperature and changes in rainfall coupled land use and human
population growth will put more stress on the benthic and epibenthic inshore and near shore
faunal communities. The resulting BODs and CODs may precipitate a decrease in standing crop
of both bionomically (e.g., the zooplankton, mysids, amphipods that serve as major food sources
for juvenile
fishes)
and
economically
(e.g.,
oysters,
penaeid
shrimps,
blue
crabs)
important
organisms resulting in significant negative ecological and economic effects
ʺEsquemas de adaptacion a los cambios climaticos globales como son el incremento del nivel
medio del mar (Translation: Plans of adaptacion to the changes climaticos global as are the
increment of the medium level of the sea.) ʺ
The impact of the Gulf of Mexico to both short, medium and long term Regional, National, and
Global climate
Sea Level Rise
Better understanding of expected future rates of relative sea level rise and impacts to natural and
cultural resources of the western Gulf of Mexico
Understanding past, present, and future sea‐level trends Understanding the effects of future sea‐
level rise on landscape and ecosystems
Mostly has been addressed...but we need a comprehensive vulnerability assessment (esp. in
relation to sea level rise) conducted that incorporates conservation strategies of declining habitat
types and species
Also, allowing fringing marsh retreat with increasing sea levels
Storms
Increased hurricane activity due to changes caused by global warming
What are the vulnerability of the Gulf coast because of global climate change
ORPP Theme: Improving Ecosystem Health
RP14: Understand and predict the impact of natural and anthropogenic processes on the ecosystem
Fishing industry
Address effects of the shrimping industry destroying the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico and the
effects of the commercial shrimping industry has as far as by catch is concerned
Research on the Enhancement of Alabamaʹs Gulf Coast Fisheries by Development of Artificial
Reefs should
be
evaluated
Will commercial fishing harm the ecosystem in the coming years?
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 88/291
Coastal development and human population growth in coastal areas
How has increased human population density and habitat modification in the coastal zone
affected estuarine habitats and estuarine‐dependent species?
Impact of increasing land development on barrier islands and coastlines
Anthropogenic impacts on the coastal zone, especially due to the expected spike in human
inhabitants within 100 miles of the water
How
has
increased
human
population
density
and
habitat
modification
in
the
coastal
zone
affected estuarine habitats and estuarine‐dependent species?
Better understanding of the connections between Gulf Ecosystem with that of the coastal zone
and the impact continued population growth with have and the potential solutions
Impact of increasing land development on barrier islands and coastlines
Many of the questions touch upon the connection between patterns of land development and
coastal ecological health, but none focus in on quantifying the nexus between land development,
land use, and ocean/water impacts
projections along the northern gulf coast projections of population change along the northern
gulf coast implications of global petroleum production peaking (Hubbertʹs Peak)
Though covered indirectly, I think that increase water temperature and changes in rainfall
coupled land use and human population growth will put more stress on the benthic and
epibenthic inshore and near shore faunal communities. The resulting BODs and CODs may
precipitate a decrease in standing crop of both bionomically (e.g., the zooplankton, mysids,
amphipods that serve as major food sources for juvenile fishes) and economically (e.g., oysters,
penaeid shrimps, blue crabs)important organisms resulting in significant negative ecological and
economic effects. If during the next 15 years there a more immediate sea level rise caused by
sooner than anticipated by shifts and sloughing of the ice sheet in western Antarctica, there
would be very serious impacts on the barrier islands (e.g., Horn Island, MS would cease to exist),
tidal marshes (diking would curtail reestablishment of tidal marshes into the lower flood plains
adjacent to the mouths of rivers, etc
Impacts of different land use patterns on coastal resource health
Coastal Population growth trend
Understand the impact of continued and increasing human overpopulation and
overdevelopment on the Gulfʹs physical and biotic environment, and communicate this
understanding effectively to the public and to lawmakers
Research concerning future land use development and ecosystem protection
Habitat loss and development pressure
ʺOver‐populationʺ of stressed coastal ecosystems
Coastal Development
Impacts of coastal development from increased population growth Develop smart coastal
development at
the
local
and
state
levels
SMART growth
Impact of land use patterns on ecology of the Gulf and the development of mitigation techniques
How to improve quality of life for human coastal residences first and the nation second
Coastal zone development and impacts on the marine environment
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 89/291
Anthropogenic Impacts
Ecosystem and societal impacts of marine debris from coastal storms
Hydrologic and biological effects of mangrove modification and deforestation
Detrimental loss of wetlands habitat to human development
I would give highest priority to research that focuses on habitat destruction and eutrophication
Loss of coastal wetlands
Ocean
noise
impacts
to
marine
mammals
and
other
fauna
and
flora
The effect of bridges built over marine estuaries
The impact of human pressures and global warming on parasite and diseases of commercial
resources and its impact on their sustainability
Inter‐relationships between increased coastal development, eutrophication, HABs, and higher
trophic levels (e.g. charismatic megafauna, sea and shore birds, marine reptiles) since all carry
high economic benefits to coastal states
Ecotoxicological modeling of stressed populations due to anthropogenic impacts
Coastal erosion and freshwater diversion inter‐relationship and impacts/effects such as dead‐
zones
Studies involved in determining the ecosystem and economic impacts of diverting the main flow
of the Mississippi River
Altering human behaviors that are currently known threats to ecosystem health
The effect of continued anthropogenic changes in the marine environment on the sustainability of
marine ecosystems
Improved predictions of wetland loss, especially in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain, and
especially estimates of loss due to sea level rise/climate change Improve wetland restoration
techniques, especially in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain‐Miss. R diversions, marsh creation,
barrier island restoration Improved understanding of hypoxia on the Inner Continental Shelf of
Louisiana and Texas Advancements in science that can help facilitate restoration of water quality
on the Inner Continental Shelf of Louisiana and Texas (D.O.) Improved understanding of
seagrasses in Texas‐ trends, human impacts, management (role of water quality protection‐ TSS, nutrients) Research on contaminant effects at hotspots (Patrick Bayou, Greens Bayou, San Jacinto
River, Lavaca Bay, hotspots in Coastal Bend Bays, etc)and potential restoration techniques
Effects of human induced changes (overfishing, shoreline hardening, dredging, etc.) on
environmental resilience
To better understand anthropogenic impacts to the Gulf in order to prioritize management
activities to ameliorate those impacts
Human environmental impact reversal
Mitigation plans for oil spills, wastewater and anthropogenic and natural hazards need to be
updated/incorporate real‐time COOS information
Understanding
and
mitigating
human
‐induced
impacts
on
ecosystems
Oceanography (all disciplines) of interactions between the continental shelves and continental
slopes. Processes involved (all disciplines) in deep benthic boundary layers around the GOM.
Identifying threatened coastal landscapes and habitats, including terrestrial Protecting
threatened landscapes
We need to continue our research in the areas of fisheries sustainability and improved water
quality which may be interwoven within Improving Ecosystem Health and Enhancing Human
Health issues
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 90/291
Develop a better understanding of how coastal systems and the open Gulf may respond to
changes (increases or decreases)of various anthropogenic stressors, including nutrient or toxic
inputs, fishing pressure, changes in freshwater inflow, etc
Understanding how ecological processes and human impacts propagate across spatial and
temporal scales, and incorporating that into predictive spatially explicit models
Feasibility studies on the use of clean cement debris waste for coastal erosion and barriers?
Effects of
seasonal
diversion
techniques
on
the
marine
and
vegetational
species?
The impact of the ecosystem health of the Gulf of Mexico on groundwater and other freshwater
resources
Assessment of salt water intrusion and mitigation alternatives
General Water Quality
We need improved water quality which may be interwoven within Improving Ecosystem Health
and Enhancing Human Health issues
Anthropogenic impacts Water quality
Historic trends in water quality
Energy industry
Impact of off‐shore drilling and development on barrier islands and coastlines
gas hydrates and oil / gas seeps and their impact on ecosystems and atmosphere
oil spills
Effects of ʺonce through coolingʺ and ʺopen systemʺ cooling systems associated with active (and
proposed)power plants and LNG plants along coastal estuaries and shallow near‐shore gulf
environments
Specifically, Evaluate potential threats to ecosystem health from oil drilling
Pollution and Contaminants
Research needs to not be so focused on just the environmental impacts such as climate changes. These changes are so long term they do not relate to existing dangers from pollution and hazard
mitigation after storm events and these are more immediate needs
More research is needed on pollution and contamination of near shore areas, such as bays and
estuaries, and how to prevent these man‐made pollution problems from happening, either
through better enforcement or more regulations. Too many people take for granted that the
larger ocean can sustain waste discharges when much of this waste never leaves the near shore
areas
scenic quality protection, non‐point source pollution
Effects of endocrine disrupters and human/livestock pathogens (contained in runoff and waste
water discharge)
on
estuaries
and
near
shore
environments
assess long term trends of pollutant concentrations, e.g. Hg. Assess the impact of coastal
development on nutrient budgets, assess the impact of sewage inflow
Need to better understand the chemistry and impacts of pollutants at the land‐sea interface
use of onsite wastewater treatment systems and their impact on the environment, food chain
Develop effective strategies for treating or precluding anthropogenic pollution sources (land and
airborne) from entering the Gulf, coastal waters and its tributaries
Effects of pharmaceuticals to non‐target species
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 91/291
Additional research on mercury levels and how to reduce the level of mercury in the Gulf of
Mexico. mercury in fish and the coastal environment
emerging contaminants,
Reducing the impact of plastics on ocean life, especially very tiny ʺmicrobeadʺ plastics now in use
in many cosmetics
Hypoxia
and
Eutrophication
Mutually address increased nutrient enrichment nationally
Excess nutrient loading in the Gulf region
Anoxic or ʺdeadʺ zone off the coast of Louisiana and other states
Hypoxia
eutrophication
How Gulf of Mexico dead zone affects ecosystem
GOM Dead Zone and change in its size, location, duration due to climate change, and inputs
from inland sources via rivers
Understanding hypoxia on the LA and TX coast
Effects of eutrophication and hypoxia on biological resources
development of the sedimentary environment with respect to organic matter accumulation and
oxygen consumption
Nutrient runoff/precision farming to prevent hypoxia
Dead Zone and anoxic conditions of the Gulf
establishing a better understanding of and means of reversing the dead zone(s)
What effects other than the ʹdead zoneʹmight there be to increased nutrient loading in the GOM?
Hypoxia and the Dead zone ‐ need to have a national perspective to deal with this growing
problem ‐ one that serious impacts your regional priorities concerning ecosystem health, human
health and sustainable resource use as well as a host of socio‐economic issues
Investigation of hypoxic area that can cause fish and invertebrate kills harmful to commercial and
recreational fishing and to overall ecosystem health
Long‐term elimination of hypoxia problems‐Root causes and mitigations as a national priority
with time lines
Mitigation of causes of hypoxic zone
Coastal erosion and freshwater diversion inter‐relationship and impacts/effects such as dead‐
zones
Finding out why we have the dead zones in parts of the Gulf of Mexico
dead zone
Eutrophication and ecosystem health, and correlation with increases in coastal populations along
the Gulf Coast
Mississippi
River
discharge
and
sedimentation
rates
affecting
the
hypoxic
zone
and
what
climatological affects are potentially spawned by such events
The DEAD ZONE. This situation is not being addressed, yet ʺenvironmental concernsʺwhich
have limited if any negative effects are being employed to modify and control the development
of needed industrial complexes. The possible use of wide spread aeration of much of the DEAD
ZONE, as a byproduct of the use of energy generation, has not been effectively evaluated or
presented for consideration
continue to address the cause and elimination of dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico
Elimination of dead zone(s)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 92/291
Evaluate the causes and effect of the ʺdead zoneʺ on various levels of marine life in the Gulf
Need Federal legislation and monitoring to reduce the Dead Zone. More research into how to
accomplish should be done immediately
Study of the Dead Zone off LA
Factors contributing to hypoxic zones Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia
Nutrient Influences on Hypoxia and Harmful Algal Blooms
Ideas
for
the
mitigation
or
reversal
of
dead
zones
off
the
mouth
of
the
Mississippi
River...
Understanding and reducing the annual Dead Zone
Expansion of hypoxic zones
Dead Zone decrease: Use of riparian buffers, decrease in fertilizer use, and ʺFrench Drainsʺwith
denitrifying bacteria to decrease nitrate
Need to identify causes of severe anoxic events‐evaluate timing of wastewater/other discharge to
coastal waters;
The two main priorities should be eutrophication and habitat loss
gulf hypoxia and its impacts
The dead‐zone in our gulf is a stark reminder of the negative impact of ʹstatus‐quoʹ agricultural
practices. Thatʹs enough for now
Hypoxic effects on marine fauna and human health
did you cover the influence of 38 states and the impact to Hypoxia ‐maybe that question is too
specific
Solving the growing problem of artificial eutrophication and the ʺdead zoneʺ in the Gulf of
Mexico
Mitigation activities for the hypoxia zone
The two main priorities should be eutrophication and habitat loss
The DEAD ZONE. This situation is not being addressed, yet ʺenvironmental concernsʺwhich
have limited if any negative effects are being employed to modify and control the development
of needed industrial complexes. The possible use of wide spread aeration of much of the DEAD
ZONE, as a byproduct of the use of energy generation, has not been effectively evaluated or presented for consideration
To determine the major sources of contaminants contributing to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico
and seeks solutions to the control and elimination of these sources of contaminants before it
progressively and negatively impacts more of the coastal ecosystem
Understanding the hypoxic dead zone
GOM Dead Zone and change in its size, location, duration due to climate change, and inputs
from inland sources via rivers
Natural Processes
Meteorology
of
the
GOM,
including
air
‐sea
‐coastal
interactions
and
pollutant
transport
Oceanographic anomalies impact on terrestrial and marine ecosystems
nutrient cycling, especially in the terrestrial‐coastal interphase
understanding the effects of Gulf ecosystem processes on coastal estuarine systems
Basic research on ecosystem structure and function has lagged in the Gulf for decades. More
needs to be done to stimulate basic research
The fate/movement of sediment in near‐shore environments. How does sediment transport effect
the near shore environment along the Gulf Coast (and not just within state lines)
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 93/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 94/291
Anthropogenic versus Natural Processes
Specifically, support research to define and distinguish natural from anthropogenic variation in
ecosystem change. This type of research will best guide management efforts across many
disciplines and themes
Evaluate interactions between natural and anthropogenic stressors at the individual and
population levels
Affects
of
estuaries
on
GOM
stability
and
recovery
from
natural
disasters
and
responses
to
anthropogenic pressures on those estuaries
How do short‐term (episodic) forcings of the ocean influence the transport of nutrients, species,
and pollutants? How does this repositioning of materials contribute to the climate of the Gulf of
Mexico, and how important are the variations in this climate
Natural biomass variability within the region (similar to short term climate variability) ‐‐ can you
separate naturally occurring variability from anthropogenic influences
Complete and aggressive biodiversity inventories in the open Gulf, deep Gulf, and marginal
estuaries and lagoons. This is critical if the rate of change in the Gulf reflects the rate of
anthropogenic change on the Gulf coast
Studies on the fragile ecosystems of costal zones
2) Research in the various priority areas conducted at multiple spatial scales to improve our
understanding of how issues such as ecosystem health are linked locally and regionally. Increase
and encourage collaborative projects between Sea Grant programs
Upstream and Watershed issues
Influence of freshwater inflow on GOM estuaries and carbon transport onto the continental shelf
Freshwater resources to bays and estuaries Loss of sediment transport from river
impoundments which results in increased erosion and habitat loss
More Mississippi river siphons to replenish the Delta
Analysis of freshwater flows. Analysis of the impacts of decreased and restored freshwater flows
to tributaries to the GOM to the health of estuarine systems mitigating/eliminating human impact to ocean resources arising from inland waters
I think you have pretty well covered it all unless you want to list some specific priorities such as
storm water runoff. The world has a serious problem with over use of natural resources, over
population and the environment and they are all inter connected
Water quality degradation (eutrophication) resulting from watershed runoff
Nutrient loading from North American rivers and impacts on the Gulf
Status and trends related to storm water runoff and its impacts on the living resources and
habitats of the Gulf under current rates of development and current building practices
Determine the effects of watershed use and water diversions on interactions in the GOM
None
of
the
priorities
listed
deal
with
what
is
actually
happening
up
in
the
mountains
in
the
Mexican portion of the Gulf, v.gr. excessive nutrients, rich soils and sediments runoff from
accelerated desertification of ʺSierra Madre Orientalʺmountain range due to deforestation. Lost
of mangrove forest in Mexico is accelerated for tourist developments and ever justified by jobs
creation and foreign investment. Campeche State government just recently got approval from
SEMARNAT (? why) to throw down hundreds of hectares of mangroves for a tourist
development (golf club and hotels greenlands!). Quintana Roo State...another lost case
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 95/291
Many problems in the ocean (Gulf of Mexico), in the Mexican side stem from problems on land.
For example, depending on the Phisiography of the hydrological basin. Would not be important
to consider the study of the connection between land and ocean?
Most have been well‐addressed. In addition to reducing the loss of coastal marshes (and their
associated biota, such as GOM marsh‐dependent fishes), the role of coastal watersheds in causing
or reducing (e.g., denitrification in the Atchafalaya Basin) pollution is also an area that could be
of significant
importance
in
the
coming
decades
Effects of non‐point source discharge, storm water run‐off, nutrient loading and fertilizer
use/misuse from the Mississippi river and other rivers on estuaries and the Gulf
Impact of increased corn‐ based ethanol production on Gulf Hypoxia
Mitigate environmental pollution both from ships and oil rigs and from terrestrial (e.g., river
outflow) sources
Need more information about the estuary‐ocean interface as far as human impacts on coastal
areas, mercury contamination, reduced freshwater inflow (due to upstream diversions), etc
International and Inter‐state water pollution carried by Gulf currents to affect down flow systems
Affects of levee systems on floodplains and how to correct past mistakes
Relationship of land borne environmental elements (sediment, freshwater, nutrients) on coastal
and ocean processes;
Understanding how land use change within river basins associated with the Gulf affect the
biological integrity and climatic roles of the Gulf
Upstream/headwater impacts on downstream/coastal water quality was included in a round‐
about way, but this should be given more direct attention
understand the link between highlands, lowlands and the ocean by producing hard data
regarding their link and the effect of land use change, erosion, water diversion and pesticide
input
Diverting silt deposit away from continental shelf and redirecting this silt to the Mississippi
Delta
Potential implications of a catastrophic diversion of the Mississippi River to the Atchafalaya River
Interaction between Gulf of Mexico and estuaries through physical forcing, nutrients and trophic
exchange. Influence of freshwater inflow on GOM estuaries and carbon transport onto the
continental shelf
Quality and quantity of freshwater inflow
Fully understanding the link between watersheds and estuarine systems
Salt water intrusion in the B‐T estuary region due to continued coastal erosion
Possible redirection/redeposition of sediment at/from the mouth of the river
Needed are studies to better assess the impacts of rivers on the Gulf so that management
decisions can
be
made
Freshwater inflows
More Mississippi river siphons to replenish the Delta
Freshwater resources to bays and estuaries Loss of sediment transport from river
impoundments which results in increased erosion and habitat loss
Land‐Ocean Interaction ‐ Assessment of total freshwater and nutrient inflows to the Gulf of
Mexico from all surrounding states (US and Mexico)
change in drought/flood incidents re the Mississippi R causes and
Interaction with groundwater from coastal states
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 96/291
Fully understanding the link between watersheds and estuarine systems ‐
Inland responsibility to the functionality of Gulf Coast habitat
in a more direct form, the influence of all watershed on the gulf the desertification of some areas
far away from the coast but that have an important influence through the rivers to the gulf
understand the link between highlands, lowlands and the ocean by producing hard data
regarding their link and the effect of land use change, erosion, water diversion and pesticide
input
mitigating/eliminating human impact to ocean resources arising from inland waters
None of the priorities listed deal with what is actually happening up in the mountains in the
Mexican portion of the Gulf, v.gr. excessive nutrients, rich soils and sediments runoff from
accelerated desertification of ʺSierra Madre Orientalʺmountain range due to deforestation. Lost
of mangrove forest in Mexico is accelerated for tourist developments and ever justified by jobs
creation and foreign investment. Campeche State government just recently got approval from
SEMARNAT (? why) to throw down hundreds of hectares of mangroves for a tourist
development (golf club and hotels greenlands!). Quintana Roo State...another lost case
Your survey focuses almost exclusively on the marine environment, and I think it would be a
mistake to disassociate the GOM from coastal watersheds (even at the Mississippi River scale)
regarding ecosystem health and the associated impacts on human populations and marine life
did you cover the influence of 38 states and the impact to Hypoxia ‐maybe that question is too
specific
Harmful Algal Blooms
harmful algal blooms
The cause of the harmful algal blooms must be determined. The blooms have a significant
negative economic impact when the blooms occur
Hazardous algal blooms relation to anthropogenic activities such as agriculture
red tide events
Relationship of large scale upland runoff to Harmful Algae Blooms Better understanding of karenia brevis red tide events in the West Florida Coast…
Red tide effects on marine fauna and human health
Hazardous algal blooms relation to anthropogenic activities such as agriculture
Establish Gulf Oyster beds as a mechanism to control HABʹs and the associated toxins
Invasive Species
Are invasive (non resident) species increasing in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and is this the result
of anthropogenic activities? Have the >4000 oil/gas platforms contributed to this increase? What
will the effect of these species be on GOM marine/estuarine communities?
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 97/291
RP15: Apply understanding of natural and anthropogenic processes to develop socioeconomic
assessments and models to evaluate the impact of multiple human uses on ecosystems
Addressing coastal population growth with land use scenarios and the natural processes and
habitats those scenarios affect
More focus should be paid to the social and economic impacts as well
understanding
functional
values
of
ecosystems
Identify and catalog socioeconomic impacts associated with natural and man‐made events
Understand the relationship between natural events and communities. Understand short and
long‐term demographic changes resulting from hurricanes, oil spills, harmful algal blooms, etc
Inter‐relationships between increased coastal development, eutrophication, HABs, and higher
trophic levels (e.g. charismatic megafauna, sea and shore birds, marine reptiles) since all carry
high economic benefits to coastal states
Studies involved in determining the ecosystem and economic impacts of diverting the main flow
of the Mississippi River
Growth of use markets on the bio system of the Gulf of Mexico e.g. recreational impact and
subsequent impact on users
Expanding fuel use and subsequent impact by more users
identify major factors affecting energy transport from estuaries into Gulf
Coastal development is proceeding rapidly, and the influences of changing human geographical
distribution on coastal processes, as well as the ability of the coast to continue to function
ecologically, will be critical
Economic indicators of impacts to ocean resources
Future development, city planning and their impacts on the coastal ecosystems. We must deal
with future issues of human inputs, management etc
Communications and behavior change research, especially related to hazard mitigation and
development activities
Understand how human population growth will affect our near shore and aquatic environments. Develop tools for planning and develop investment resources for management of above effects.
Develop tools and resources for local communities to deal with above issues
Another piece that is not mentioned is research regarding innovations in financial markets and
financial products and the environment. (Iʹm going out on a limb here, but something to think
about). There are innovations in financial products, such as catastrophe bonds, weather
derivatives, futures etc ‐ that create money flows and investments in areas that relate to Gulf of
Mexico issues. This is not something that is never discussed in meetings of academics and policy
people ‐ is this something worth exploring?
Value of coastal rivers and their discharge of fresh water to estuaries and near shore waters.
Study alterations
already
in
place
(dams)
and
project
what
proposed
dams
and
alterations
can
do
to tailwater sections of river including the coastal reaches of rivers. Look at cumulative impacts
where dams exist and more dams are proposed esp. for economic development and flood control.
Mississippiʹs Pearl River drainage is one such stream
Socioeconomics of coastal resource restoration and management
Identify how wetland banks operate and assess if they are efficient
Lacks inclusion of key attributes for ...renewable and sustainable resources, and relations to
coastal water qualities and community well being
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 98/291
I feel that often the understanding of biological systems takes precedent over the understanding
of human systems. More funding needs to be put in to understanding the human systems
Need ways to translate data into information, i.e., connect the dots. Need more integrated studies
where natural and social science are connected
RP16: Apply understanding of marine ecosystems to develop appropriate indicators and metrics for
sustainable use
and
effective
management
Development of environmental impact indicators
Development of nutrient criteria in the Gulf of Mexico and the inclusion of Mexico in these
criteria
Establish sustainable loading for nutrients to the Gulf of Mexico and recommend policies that
could achieve that loading. Identify freshwater needs for Gulf estuaries and recommend
policies for maintaining those flows
development of biotic indicator status
Develop a series of indicators, including biomarkers, of ecosystem structure, function and
resilience
use of indicator species and/systems as indicators of ecosystem health
Development of nutrient criteria in the Gulf of Mexico and the inclusion of Mexico in these
criteria
ORPP Theme: Enhancing Human Health
RP17: Understand sources and processes contributing to ocean‐related risks to human health
Harmful Algal Blooms
Identification and characterization of harmful algal bloom species and their impacts on coastal
tourism and public health
Better understanding of the relationships between indigenous microorganisms and human health
needs to be promoted. This includes HABs, pathogenic bacteria and viruses, fungi, and parasites
Understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the initiation of harmful algal blooms
HABs‐ links with human activities (e.g. nutrient loading)‐red tide, brown tide, cyanobacteria
The cause of the harmful algal blooms must be determined. The blooms have a significant
negative economic impact when the blooms occur
Hazardous algal blooms relation to anthropogenic activities such as agriculture
Nutrient Influences on Harmful Algal Blooms
Better understanding of karenia brevis red tide events in the West Florida Coast...
Hypoxic/Red
tide
effects
on
marine
fauna
and
human
health
Mercury Bioaccumulation
Need more information about the estuary‐ocean interface as far as mercury contamination
Additional research on mercury levels and how to reduce the level of mercury in the Gulf Of
Mexico
mercury in fish and the coastal environment
Human pathogens and wastewater
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 99/291
Human pathogens and harmful substances associated with GOM seafood
Onsite wastewater treatment systems and their impact on drinking water
The idea that the ocean ʺis a source of human health hazardsʺ is untrue when speaking of human
pathogens. Humans and inadequate wastewater treatment are the sources of these hazards, not
the oceans
Others
Understand the effects of human activity and climate change on shellfish safety
Oil refinery effects on human health
Learning more about the oceans and their inhabitants, both as a point of scientific curiosity and
from the benefit of human health and nutrition.
RP18: Understand human health risks associated with the ocean and potential benefits of ocean
resources to human health
Improved characterization of risks to human health from different bacteria sources (human vs.
livestock/wildlife) in coastal recreational water environments
Human pathogens and harmful substances associated with GOM seafood
Key attributes for seafood production (e.g., oyster resources per safety issues)
There are increasing food allergies in the population, and seafood allergies are increasing
dramatically. Increasing our ability to test (in forensic ways) fresh seafood should be a priority
Mercury levels and other chemical levels in our seafood that could be a hazard to our health
Mercury bioaccumulation in commercial fisheries
Seafood contamination & seafood safety
RP19: Understand how human use and valuation of ocean resources can be affected by ocean‐ borne
human health threats and how human activities can influence these threats
Identification and characterization of harmful algal bloom species and their impacts on coastal
tourism and public health
Understand short and long‐term demographic changes resulting from hurricanes, oil spills,
harmful algal blooms, etc.
More focus should be paid to the social and economic impacts
RP20: Apply understanding of ocean ecosystems and biodiversity to develop products and biological
models to enhance human well‐ being
Development of ʺplug‐and‐playʺ sensor technologies to assist with beach health initiatives and
shellfish bed management
Increasing our ability to test (in forensic ways) fresh seafood should be a priority
Research on sources of coastal indicator bacteria loadings
Improved bacterial indicators whose occurrence correlates with the risks identified above
Comments Organized by Other Categories
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 100/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 101/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 102/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 103/291
The GoM falls within the EEZ of three nations. Over the mid‐term, there should be a cooperative
international effort to map critical habitat and human use patterns to develop comprehensive
spatial governance schemes
Complete inventories of existing resources to understand what the extent of the impacts will be.
Develop consistent and complete long‐term monitoring programs for natural resources of the
coastal and marine areas of the Gulf
Coordinated
effort
to
determine
the
distribution
of
ocean
habitats,
fauna
and
flora
that
use
them,
and associated productivity levels
General biosurveys ‐who is there INVASIVE SPECIES!! ‐ (including introduction and monitoring
and prevention)
Mapping deep‐sea/cold water coral
Modeling Topics
Strong support for the development of ecosystem‐ based modeling tools for management
Integration of ocean biological and physical models with ocean observations
Ensure that any ʺmodelsʺ or other data generated is user friendly and highly assessable to
environmental consultants. These professionals need high quality, easy to find data to give their
clients (whether private of government) the very latest and best in ocean resource research
findings
A complete, high resolution bathymetry set, a marine data type that can handle the
multidimensional characteristics of the marine/biogeochemical environment, use of a marine data
model that can help integrate data and information in differing formats, measurements, scales,
and languages, across the many different disciplines, and a portal for ALL that information
Need for improved coastal mapping and detailed bathymetry Need for adaptive management
and monitoring of coastal restoration Need for comprehensive monitoring of ecosystem health
through sustained observations, including harmful algal blooms, coastal eutrophication and
hypoxia
mapping inventory (Mississippi) Assessment, mapping, surveying deepwater resources (e.g., Pulleyʹs Ridge)
real‐time environmental data collection, analysis, model building
Development of high resolution coastal physical and ecosystem models that can address natural
variability, extreme events and climatic changes and support long term observational monitoring
networks for model validation
Getting known research results, models, programs, and tools to the hands of people that need it.
Spend more efforts translating this information to those that need it
Capability to use interactive modeling to assess impacts (natural and man‐made) on coastal
system behavior/conditions
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 104/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 105/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 106/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 107/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 108/291
There are some institutional blocks to investigating some environmental impacts. Examination of
agricultural effects and oil exploration on water quality are avoided in response to exemptions
from regulation. The facts need to be obtained regardless of political public policy
NMFS marine mammal stock assessments for the Gulf of Mexico are woefully out of date. They
should be brought up to date, and the threats to these stocks should be more clearly identified
and quantified as possible, including threats beyond commercial fishing operations (such as
environmental contaminants,
recreational
fishing
gear
entanglement
and
ingestion,
boat
collisions and disturbance, etc.). Current and emerging threats need to be considered in
management plans for these animals, along with changes to their ecosystems. We should work
more closely with the other 2 countries that share responsibility for the Gulf (Mexico, Cuba) to
assess resources and threats
resource governance
Coastal ʺprotectionʺ efforts and their role in further isolating valuable wetlands and taking them
out of ʺfisheries productionʺ
Mitigation is a highly volatile word that needs redefining and lawful implementation
Importance of Ecosystem Management‐‐showing the importance of the land to the ocean as well
as the ocean to the land
Coastal Public Access
Although we wish to believe in the concept of sustainable use of all coastal resources‐this is a
myth that could have catastrophic consequences for the future. Actions should be taken to
identify, label, prioritize and develop improved regulatory contingencies for these limited and
threatened Coastal Resources
I fear that giving authority to make laws and regulations or to allow research to be used by the
Government is unwise unless the research is verified and proven scientific by mutually agreed
upon scientists is unwise. Case in point: The National Marine Fisheries stock assessment
ecosystem based management of natural resources combine with human intervention and
disruption
Establishment of construction codes and practices that can withstand future hurricanes and
storms
Develop standards and practices for low CO2 emission to slow the progress of climate change
The linking of scientific and technological information and discoveries to the decisions of policy
makers and the public related to economic and social behaviors, policy choices, planning and
resource allocation
Marine protected areas, conflicts between marine conservation and marine resource dependent
communities
Importance of marine protected areas to long‐term conservation of the Gulf and establishment of
a network of such reserves
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 109/291
Habitat / Restoration Topics
Habitat loss
Habitat restoration and degradation
The two main priorities should be eutrophication and habitat loss
large‐scale coastal restoration
Identification of marine resources needed to aid in coastal restoration
Subsidence
and
loss
of
critical
wetland
habitats
Habitat and water quality improvements
Remediation of wetland loss
Develop effective restoration methods and strategies for improving coastal and near shore
habitats
large‐scale coastal restoration
Coastal wetland restoration
Address the Louisiana coastal land loss problem through restoration projects
Develop all information and data for use in coastal restoration and to maximize restoration rate
while minimizing to the extent potential adverse effects
Development of a Gulf‐wide coastal sediment database to better identify sediment sources for
beach and wetland restoration projects
barrier island restoration, migration, land use
evidence of subsidence
Restoration of wetlands to absorb energy from storms and protect water quality
protection, restoration and expansion of sea grass beds barrier island restoration and protection
coastal marsh/wetlands and maritime forest protection, restoration and expansion areas
Restoration of sea grasses and sea life in bays along the Gulf needs to be a focus of more research.
Human degradation of those areas must be addressed and policies formulated, enacted, and
enforced to improve quality of life in those waters
Most effective and efficient methods for use in coastal restoration or preservation. It falls under
the general topics included, but is not specifically stated
Restoration strategies, techniques and impacts. Investigations of the options for restoring marine
systems such as coral reefs, oyster reefs, sea grass beds, salt and brackish marshes and the success
rates of those techniques
Habitat restoration
Identifying threatened coastal landscapes and habitats, including terrestrial Protecting
threatened landscapes Research concerning future land use development and ecosystem
protection
Rebuilding wetlands and barrier Islands lost due to human intervention, such as levees built on
the Mississippi River which have over the YEARS forced the sediment off the continental shelf vs.
being used
to
rebuild
the
wetlands
and
Barrier
Islands
Cost‐effective coastal restoration technologies. Triage methods to determine which areas can be
saved and which will have to be let go
large‐scale coastal restoration
Coastal wetland restoration
Need for adaptive management and monitoring of coastal restoration
Habitat restoration and degradation
Need to evaluate how wetlands will change with climate change and appropriate restoration
strategies for now and into the future
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 110/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 111/291
General Responses to Open‐Ended Question
I based my priority rankings on what I think is the level of priority currently in the area and not
what the priority should be. I believe that these are all important themes and research areas in
the GOM. Thus, I think that the priority level should be higher
The language used in phrasing the questions was wordy and confusing
I would
like
to
see
the
Plan
made
available
to
all
citizens
of
the
Gulf
Coast
area
What regional planning effort? If there is one, it is not being made obvious to researchers. There
are too many such groups all working in isolation (e.g., GOMA, NGI, etc)
More information is needed on the Ocean Research Priorities Plan
See note about the disproportionate representation of Louisiana individuals on the panel
More research done in the western gulf states, specifically Texas
It’s clear that much of the data collected to support research in any of these priority areas can also
be used for others. They arenʹt mutually exclusive. It would be nice to see a regional or inter‐
regional plan acknowledge and address this so that data collection and data integration can
serve as many of these priorities in the Gulf as possible
As of this date, most everything has been addressed. But life changes as the world changes
within the next fifteen years
It is unclear whether this survey is limited to the Gulf of Mexico (i.e. that water area beyond the
shoreline) or includes the coastal and estuarine areas and the upland, all of which affect the Gulf
proper
Not much thinking outside the box. Priorities have already been established, and we are merely
asked to respond to them. This questionnaire seems designed to authorize an existing agenda,
not create a new one. Therefore it was a waste of time
After years of working in the Gulf fishery I have seen amazing research and understanding bring
about some great ideas. Unfortunately special interests have seen ways into the process at key
times and have skewed the results of the effort. Combined with a general lack of results from
law enforcement, be it due to under‐funding or courts not being willing to effectively penalize
violators, all this research and all of these rules generally offer little benefit to our fishery. The
management of the Gulf fishery has been well intended and is important but without
enforcement of the rules now in place how can we say our research indicates different rules are
needed. Quite simply, the most important and only useful research relating to the outcome of a
policy is research that occurs when the policy is completely enforced. I have seen a lot of
research findings and policy based on the failure of previous policy to effect change when the
failure is with enforcement not the previous policy. When we spend as much effort enforcing
policies in effect at this time then and only then can we conduct more research and tune the
policies we have
Good questions, good questions focus the abstraction of the thoughts into good research, good research provides best answer. God speed in your efforts Clay Rushing, Port Aransas, Texas
This survey seems tilted towards anthropogenic‐GOM interactions at the expense of basic
research, assuming potential funding is a zero sum process
There are several planning organizations as well as data management systems. There should be
more effort put into synchronizing data collection efforts, reporting, and funding between these
organizations
I work in coastal areas influenced by and associated with GOM, but not in the Gulf directly
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 112/291
It appears that navigation districts and the General Land Office often favor unfettered
development at the expense of the quality of coastal waters. These offices, which have a
responsibility to protect those waters (as well as enhance navigation) need to understand that the
balance has shifted in the past several years. Responsible management along with responsible
conservation and restoration needs to be every oneʹs focus
More involvement and input from locals who live in communities most affected by the Ocean
Research Priorities
Plan
‐These
individuals,
their
needs
and
knowledge
are
often
excluded
in
the planning process
I wish that some of the questions had an option to write or comment since from my point of view
some questions require other options to be answered. I hope you can allow me to send some
comments to some of those if that option is open
I would appreciate some dedicated effort to promote and sustain recreational boating, along with
its shore‐ based infrastructure, along the Gulf Coast
The Air Resources Laboratory is involved in two major issues: 1. Understanding the role of
atmospheric mercury in the GOM ecosystem. Primary goal is to collect supporting data to drive
models that address atmosphere‐surface exchange, transport through air and water, and
accumulation in fish. The ultimate goal is to address the threat to human health. 2.
Understanding turbulence in a variety of conditions. Under low wind conditions, to assess dry
deposition of mercury and oxidized & reduced nitrogen species. Under high wind conditions to
address effects of turbulence on building structures
ARL realizes that the ecosystem issues are driven by water processes. However for mercury and
other substances where the atmosphere is an important source or is an important part of the
chemical cycle, we wish to participate in joint studies as appropriate.ʺ
Make sure objectives are quantifiable
Has been covered well
In the last year, two research vessels based at Texas universities, the R/V Longhorn and the R/V
Gyre, have been retired. At one time Texas universities boasted five ocean‐capable research
vessels (three at UT, two at TAMU), now Texas has none. Lack of research vessels is impairing research and ocean observing initiatives in Texas waters. It should be a priority to establish a
mechanism to fund a research vessel that can be used by Texas Universities and government
agencies
publish the results of the survey
Many needs of importance have been successfully identified in this survey ‐‐ Prioritizing them
will be a bigger challenge given limited funding sources for addressing them
Survey seemed to go beyond the gulf as a region, and many items appear to address global
questions
We must have a comprehensive planning process Gulf wide that is implemented for it to be
effective. Anything
short
of
that
will
not
solve
the
problems
facing
us
in
the
Gulf
What scale should research be performed at? How long does it need to be studied?
Quit blaming the recreational fishermen for all of the marine life problems
The general themes were clearly written to try to be broad, but they had the effect of restricting
the scope of topics. It should have been more open ended. For example, what are the biggest
threats to marine systems, global warming, invasive species, development, pollution? The
wording was such that I feel that the survey was directing answers a little. Also with this type of
survey I am tempted to put all are highly important‐‐‐ but that does not provide information on
how to prioritize
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 113/291
Thank you. Iʹm glad this research is being conducted
Balancing Environmental and Economic Sustainability
The plan needs to identify long‐term source of funding
I would like to see an integrated approach to the fundamental problems related to coastal loss.
With the recent funding availability, itʹs time to have a unified approach that will better the Gulf
coast and Louisiana instead of seeing the same repetitive inter‐ and intra department and agency
turf battles
for
funding
The scope of the survey needs to be more exhaustive and less dichotomous
The regional planning and research needs to be focused on slowing and reversing the corruption
of the integrity of the Gulf
As a scientist with the State of Florida, I have come to appreciate the necessity to establish a clear
link between research and regulations. The ability of our research to facilitate change in
managing our ocean and coastal resources only goes as far as our ability to guide regulatory
policy. We as a research community must establish that link between research and regulations
because we can only implement a change to the extent that the rules will allow. Without that
statutory authority, our research will only take us so far. For this reason I think direct impacts of
Ocean Research to Ocean Policy should continue to be of the highest priority
Researchers should have their research interpretations (reports, and journal papers, etc.) archived
at central repositories to facilitate regional and state‐wide use. This is important for regional
corporate / topical memory and to provide efficient research needs critique. Too much is lost as
thesis and dissertation authors leave the area, subsequently their major professors leave the
region and said data is no longer in the realm of current researchers’ knowledge. For the
Geoscience Community the ʺState Geological Surveysʺ provide this function
Efforts need to focus not necessarily on how we can maximize our use of oceanic resources but on
how to conserve what resources we have found to date to maximize their utility. Eliminating
waste and excess is the key
National programs should be focused on GOM similar to other ocean basins, e.g. NSF. Gulf has
been treated as backyard pond with no significant importance for too long yes, the ocean research priorities plan as well as recommendations from the U.S. Commission on
Ocean Policy Report and the Pew Ocean Commission Report should all be used as a framework
to identify regional needs and state‐wide implementation
Regional planning takes us no where if there is not an specific funding for any action proposed
The ORPP is a good foundation on which to base a comprehensive approach. It is critical that
various groups such as NGI, GCOOS, Gulf Alliance coordinate their efforts and work towards a
common and mutually supportive vision for regional research issues
Having lived on the Gulf Coast for 50+ years, it is my opinion that while various impact studies
have been done through the years, the results are generally watered down and disregarded in the
name of
economic
growth.
The
time
has
come
for
these
studies
to
be
more
strongly
emphasized
and yielded to for future preservation of our natural habitat
The front end of the survey gives the impression that researchers should be taking the survey, not
the general public. The first research priority ʺStewardshipʺ did not address conservation of
marine resources and developing new uses for marine resources gives the impression of
exploitation. Any use of marine resources must be balanced against sustainability through
conservation
We to address the Other states on how much damage to human an marine life that the dead zone
hurts us now and the future for food an lost of marine life
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 114/291
How to preserve wetlands as a resource without destruction due to human habitation as a win‐
win situation. No mention of periodic over flow of Mississippi river to build up wetlands.
Similar to controlling Niagara River for tourism by controlled out flow. This will help navigation
& wetlands in place of either or approach. We need both navigation for commerce and wetlands
for storm protection
Thanks!
Iʹm
an
employee
of
a coastal
county.
I would
like
to
know
what
role
local
governments
could
play in management of the Gulf in an ecologically friendly way. I think our board of
commissioners and staff would like to know more about how to participate in regional efforts.
Should we be mapping habitat in our part of the gulf? Should we be sampling water quality ‐ if
so, how exactly? Should we be involved in a regional conversation about marine preserves (these
seem inevitable to me)? Can we write letters of support ‐ signed by our BCC? In this era of belt
tightening we probably cannot spend a lot of money, but we could muster professional staff and
volunteers (as appropriate) to be better stewards of our piece of the gulf. In the best scenario it
would be done in cooperation with our neighbors and be coordinated and analyzed by a regional
agency
Interesting questions. No particularly scientific questions
Boy, do you guys speak academese!
Woefully lacking avenues of estuary research
Recapture of funding from sources of past destructive effects which are now coming to light as a
result of human actions
As a member of a task force advising SIMOR, I am very familiar with the ORRP, and believe that
it provides a good national framework for identifying national needs. However, each region and
smaller geographic area will need to refine the needs to meet the regional priorities. I hope that
you will be using the results of this survey and other methods to refine the needs for the Gulf,
and that smaller geographic areas (i.e., individual estuary or coastal stretch) will not be restricted
in defining their own unique priorities. Effective management most often happens at the local
level, addressing locally‐identified priorities Thanks!!!
I would hope that interagency cooperation can transcend throughout this work so as maximum
use of available dollars is obtained.........
The survey is excellent for the long range planning but the basic information on the marine
environment must be re‐emphasized as the foundation of any and all of the subject addressed
I like the research surveyʹs and would like to know the results
If we lose the Louisiana wet lands, and they are going fast, we wonʹt need PhD’s to study them.
So I suggest we do something other than study and watch them disappear
This survey uses too many generalities and should address specific Gulf problems or processes
that are
now
all
too
familiar
to
Gulf
residents
Place the highest priority on updated information of all types for Louisiana. This should also
include the entire estuarine ecosystem, both wetlands and upland habitats
Would like to see these results and planning strategies of this survey soon. Thanks for the survey
The questions seem rather general/vague
Need more definition on current cooperative efforts in the northern Gulf of Mexico
I have no idea what ʺconsensusʺ has to do with science. Consensus‐seeking is just being
politically correct. This ʺsurveyʺ seems a waste of time
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 115/291
As a businessman I thought the Ocean Research Priorities we very broad and generally non‐
descriptive leaving a lot room for interpretation with no defined goals
Information derived from research efforts should be distributed widely, including inland
geographical areas which affect, as well as impact, oceanic biosystems and are affected by the
same
Pretty much the above
Need
to
better
coordinate
existing
programmatic
funding
to
avoid/minimize
duplication
of
effort
between agencies and intraagency programs. This could be supplemented by a new dedicated
funding source
Appreciate the opportunity for input
It would be helpful if this planning effort was more coordinated with the Gulf of Mexico Alliance
so that it could address the priorities identified by all Gulf States. A Sea Grant regional research
plan could be the research arm of the Alliance. This does not mean the Sea Grant plan should be
limited to only those topics identified by the Alliance, but extra weight should be given to those
topics that would advance these identified regional priorities
The priority areas are so broad it is difficult to give them anything other than a very high rating.
We need to get down to more specific action items to have a really meaningful input, i.e. given
limited funding, what should we do first, second, etc
We know so comparatively little about the oceans that cover 70% of the Earthʹs surface. I think
that we need to take strides in learning more about the oceans and their inhabitants, both as a
point of scientific curiosity and from the benefit of human health and nutrition. As population
increases, the amount of land available for use is decreasing rapidly, and we must seek new
frontiers or face imminent extinction
glad you are doing it and hope some real action comes out of it rather than becoming a study that
is nice, has a report and is shelved
The survey is to broad
Look at the various state priorities to gain an understanding of what would be realistically
fundable with state dollars and compatible with adjacent or other GOM state interests so that elements might be sanctioned as regional in interest and perceived need. This would provide a
slate of potential collaborations at the regional level.
The ORPP priorities are not a good fit to Gulf regional needs
Application of research is an intrical linking step between science and society... however the
research is the first step and application can not be completed until the knowledge is obtained, so
developing an understanding of marine system ecology and biology is the first stepping stone to
protecting our resources
I think this survey was too broadly‐worded for a regional survey. I feel that many of the choices
we had to choose from were too similar
...these
need
to
be
funded
adequately
so
competition
does
not
handicap
the
effort
but
rather
enhances and promotes synergy
I based my priority rankings on what I think is the level of priority currently in the area and not
what the priority should be. I believe that these are all important themes and research areas in
the GOM. Thus, I think that the priority level should be
Many Federal Agencies funding GoMEX research. Need to drive collaboration between these
agencies to ensure research dollars are optimized
Ensuring adequate cross‐pollination of research communities within the NGI and Gulf of Mexico
study groups, including GOMA, OOSʹs, etc
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 116/291
Open loop LNG processing terminals should not be permitted
I thought it was a little slack on biological sciences. Applied sciences are great, but we need to
know about the Gulf biological resources, and that means spending money on unsexy research
like taxonomy. We will pay the price if we fail to recognize this issue
I am concerned about ongoing research/planning efforts that are not coordinated ‐ Gulf of Mexico
Program (EPA), Gulf of Mexico Alliance, NOAA hypoxia monitoring, Gulf of Mexico Research
Plan, etc
Most regional planning are jokes
I hail the intent of this survey to provide planners and managers the vital information needed to
establish long‐term sustainable protective policy for the enhancement of our limited coastal
resources and the over‐all health of our communities
I understand that I am only peripherally involved in Gulf issues, but I believe hazard‐related
marine debris as well as fisheries‐generated debris are an important issue whose impacts should
be quantified through research efforts
The use of visualization technology as an end user tool
Please distribute to underserved audiences
Nothing specific, except that near‐term research questions should be prioritized in the context of
Gulf of Mexico Alliance priorities and implementation objectives
Have a method to test and evaluate new and innovative products produced as a result of
independent research and development by private companies
I felt that the wording of this survey was unnecessarily vague and confusing
Nice survey ‐‐my guess is most will rate all categories high or very high. So, how do you
prioritize? There are a number of important issues, but not enough funding. If you have only
enough money to take on 1 or 2 tasks, which ones would they be?
Basic research and prediction of the ocean, atmospheric, and marine sciences is important. In my
opinion, social science and economic studies are a waste of time.
Excellent and easy to use survey
See above Much of what was asked requires much basic knowledge of local and regional biodiversity and
functionality of various estuarine/marine systems in order to model future impacts. Much of this
basic data and not in the literature and are needed
When information is prepared for the general public, write in common English (with appropriate
second languages where appropriate), do not use acronyms, avoid government‐talk, bureaucratic
babble, and mind boggling flow charts and diagrams which the public will never read or
understand
General lack of focused research. More interest in individual research support for projects by the
PIʹs and institutions. Lack of focused funding and support for large, integrated projects that
might be
useful
in
state/federal
management
efforts
I assumed in taking this survey that when you said ʺGulf of Mexicoʺ you included the entire
coastal zone (i.e. the estuaries up to the 10 foot elevation). That wasnʹt clear in the initial
description
Include large and small stockholders. Include historical studies of areas
Individual stewardship responsibility of people
Regarding a couple of survey questions; back to back questions related to my profession and how
I used GOM research findings. One indicated if I used research findings in my profession
GMRP Appendix D
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 117/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 118/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix E: Affiliation of Gulf of Mexico Research Plan Workshop Participants and Facilitators
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 119/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 120/291
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
Louisiana State University
Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices
Coastal Restoration and Enhancement through Science and Technology
College of Agriculture
College of Education
Department
of
Environmental
Studies
Department of Food Sciences
Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences
Louisiana Geological Survey
Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Louisiana Sea Grant Marine Extension Program
LSU Agricultural Center
Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium
Mississippi Department of Marine Resources
Comprehensive Resource Management Plan
General Council
Grand Bay
National
Estuarine
Research
Reserve
Office of Fisheries Division
Mississippi Development Authority
Mississippi State University
Coastal Research and Extension Center
College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics
College of Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Extension Service
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium Extension Program
Northern Gulf
Institute
Mobile Bay National Estuary Program
Mote Marine Laboratory
MRAG Americas, Inc.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Applied Sciences Program
The Nature Conservancy
New College of Florida, Pritzker Marine Lab
Nicholls State University
Partners for Environmental Progress
PBS&J
Pinellas
County
Department
of
Environmental
Management
Prairie View A&M University, Texas Gulf Coast Environmental Data Center
Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Shaw Group
South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council
Southeast Louisiana University
Southwest Florida Water Management District
SRI International
St. Louis King of France School
GMRP Appendix E 2
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 121/291
Tanks‐A‐Lot Dive Charters
Tesla Offshore, LLC
Texas A&M University at College Station
Department of Geography
Department of Oceanography
Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System
Texas
Sea
Grant
Texas A&M University at Corpus Christi, Harte Research Institute
Texas A&M University at Galveston, Department of Marine Sciences
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries Division
Coastal Studies Program
University of Alabama
Department of Biological Sciences
Department of Geography
University of Alabama at Huntsville
University of Florida
Department of
Fisheries
and
Aquatic
Sciences
Florida Sea Grant
Florida Sea Grant Extension
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension, Escambia County
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
College of Engineering
Research and Graduate Studies
University of Mississippi
National Institute for Undersea Science and Technology
National Sea Grant Law Center
University of
South
Alabama,
Smart
Coast
University of South Florida
College of Marine Science
Florida Institute of Oceanography
University of Southern Mississippi
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Office of Research and Economic Development
University of Texas
US Environmental Protection Agency
EPA
Gulf
of
Mexico
Program
Gulf Ecology Division
US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
GMRP Appendix E 3
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 122/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 123/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix F:
Gulf of Mexico Research and Information Needs
State Workshop Reports
This document contains raw data from workshop participants. They remain in this raw form so that meanings are not unintentionally changed. Please keep this in mind when reading this document.
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 124/291
Table of Contents Texas Workshop Report............................................................................................................................ 1
Louisiana Workshop
Report......................................................................................................... 30
Mississippi Workshop Report ...................................................................................................... 63
Alabama Workshop Report .......................................................................................................... 91
Florida Workshop Report ........................................................................................................... 116
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 125/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning
Workshop Report
For the workshop held in
Galveston, Texas on
February 28, 2008
Workshops were partially funded through a grant provided by the
National Sea Grant College Program to:
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Florida Sea Grant College Program
Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Texas Sea Grant College Program
1
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 126/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 127/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Breakout Group Results
Participants in each themed breakout group identified research needs and voted for the research topics they
believed were most important. Each participant was provided eight votes and they could place up to two
votes on an individual research topic.
Prior to the voting session some breakout groups combined multiple ideas that were mentioned during the
brainstorming session, and therefore crossed out similar ideas so that they would not be available during the
voting session. The tables below include all comments written on the flip chart paper, and those topics that
were crossed out on the flip chart paper are indicated with a strike through in the ta ble.
Information needs and policy, management, and education related topics were also captured in the breakout
group sessions but were not voted on for the prioritization process. The results of these discussions are also
included under each themed heading.
3
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 128/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Research Needs
Table 1. Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” breakout
group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Human use trends
‐What is the level, what is the effect on the resource?
‐Need to increase, decrease protection of resource (regs)
‐What is socio‐economic impact of increase/decrease on
users?
15
Research on targeted trophic relationships to support
ecosystem based approach (ex: fisheries (menhaden
snapper), endangered spp., non‐indigenous spp.)
15
Bottom up. Impact of freshwater inflow on lower trophic
levels of food chain and the water quality / nutrients / sediment
11
Connectivity of populations species and habitats 11
ID changes in diversity and abundance over time and habitat
to ID causes (anthro/climate) time series over w/years 10
Develop new maps physical and biological habitats to
determine what resources exist 9
Socio‐economic value of restoration and conservation
programs and variable scales and examine if the is habitat
functioning as expected (or as replacement)
9
Analyze and predict ecosystem health through visualization
of anthropogenic stressors for GOM
6
Continuous non‐indigenous fowling community monitoring
in GOM waters 6
Research into communication and behavior change related to
conservation projects 5
Geo/technology advances and impacts to resources /
geopolitical (example: Panama Canal super panamex ships) 3
How to share and collaborate data collection in real time to
capitalize on othersʹ collections (i.e. I can use their bycatch) 2
4
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 129/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 130/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 131/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Information Needs
Add gauging stations in tidal plains to monitor water quality and quantity
High‐resolution comprehensive geophysical, habitat, bathy mapping continental shelf
Long‐term data modeling
Measure interaction between SST and ecology
More LIDAR, more often
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Better beach and dune protection policies
Info GIS‐ based geodatabase of various discipline data
Need a better understanding of data (available/accessible) and how to get it
7
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 132/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Research Needs
Table 3. Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Effect of morphological changes due on society relative to
(e.g., coastal photogrammetry); long‐term study of
(intracoastal waterway, etc.)
‐Shoreline changes
‐Development
‐Habitat identification
Sea‐level rise and its impact on industrial operations
‐Assessment
‐How
do
we
cope
7
Enhance ports
‐Develop, validate, and assimilate data models and
numerical forecast models
‐Observing system experiments (OSEs) modeling allows
you to determine optimal observations
‐Validation (comparing and improving models)
6
Enhancing coastal and real‐time systems
‐Developing and validating numerical forecast models 5
Ship traffic and port facilities marine operations Shipping,
dredging, and port facilities impacts on ecosystems, such as:
‐Air
pollution
‐Human/animal health
‐Sediment
‐Water quality
‐Dredging expansions
5
Developing better models for valuation of habitats to allow
for policy‐makers to make more informed decisions about
placement of development, etc. (cost benefit analysis)
4
Improve forecasts of hurricane intensity 4
Research and development techniques for rapid assessment
of bathymetry of ports and harbors following (i.e.,
autonomous
underwater
vehicles,
SS
sonar)
4
Determine what the mean shoreline is and making common
references (datum) for sea level measurements 2
Understanding impacts of offloading open loop LNG
terminals to ecosystems 2
Understanding loop current ring shedding, how they work
so we can increase our ability to predict 1
8
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 133/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Table 3 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Integrating differing HF radar systems 0
Develop new techniques for data assimilation into numerical
models (e.g., of circulation) 0
Dredging impacts on ecosystems 0
Information Need
Process of educating public on recreational and commercial use of the port/waterways for
successful/non‐successful use of ports (how do varying uses affect various user groups)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
(none provided)
9
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 134/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Due to group size limitations one breakout group that was comprised of individuals with interest in
“Enhancing Human Health” and/or “The Ocean’s Role in Climate” identified and prioritized research topics
and related needs for both theme areas. The top ranked research priorities from these two theme areas were
presented to the large group for the large voting session.
Research Needs
Table 4. Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting results from
the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Sea‐level rise (SLR) and climate change
‐Rate of change of SLR and subsidence
‐Effect of SLR on coastal shorelines and environment
‐Effect of SLR on ecosystems
‐Measure
public
attitude
on
SLR
‐Research on approaches to restore habitat
‐Research on local government approaches to SLR
‐Role of development in inhibiting vertical migration
15
Precipitation
‐Change in patterns and quantity (gradient shift)
‐Freshwater influx/inflow
‐Inflow of freshwater, nutrients, sediments and effect it has
on biological, biogeochemical, and physical coastal
processes
‐Frequency and intensity of droughts
13
Loop current
‐Relationship with storm frequency and intensity
‐Change in current regime
‐Temperature
‐Links to global scale climate patterns
12
Relationship of climate change to fisheries
‐Recruitment
‐Distribution
‐Link between fish ecology and climate change
12
Change climate related to temperature
‐Distribution of species
‐Invasive species change susceptibility
‐Stratification of water column
‐Link between fish ecology and climate change
9
Research best locations and types of in situ sensors needed
and temperature and spatial distribution of measurements 6
Change in CO2 levels on aquatic biology (ocean acidification) 4
10
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 135/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 136/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Information Needs
Increase monitoring and data collection (sea‐level rise, surface elevation tables) long term
monitoring
Need 3‐D patterns of currents in GOM
Standardize data measurements (establish standards)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Educate public on value of data collection and uses
Federal flood insurance policies need updated
Risk assessment
Sound policy of local community with climate change
12
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 137/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Research Needs
Table 5. Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Connectivity across the Gulf of Mexico (offshore banks roll,
connections to estuaries); connectivity around Gulf—system
wide model for the Gulf of Mexico (lay groundwork, not
just conceptual—include data on forcing functions)
‐Need data to back up connectivity claims (we think
connections are there)
8
Impacts of multiple anthropogenic stressors on estuarine
populations (water quality degradation, fresh water inflow,
alternates, loss of habitat)
7
Freshwater inflow
‐Effects of changing habitat characteristics on user species
and production characteristics of the system
‐Researching putting processed water in confined areas
‐Use oysters as indicator species (health/disease and
abundance)
‐Hydrodynamics‐‐impacts to aquifers/understanding
underground water movement
6
Development of ecosystem model; (Ecopath—parks and
wildlife (TPWD) working on University of Houston)
‐Lay out relationships in food web
‐Lay out connections to abiotic factors
5
Impacts of fisheries on the bottom habitat in the Gulf of
Mexico, commercial and recreational
‐On bottom habitat
‐Impacts of structures
‐Removal of top predators (impacts of)
‐Impacts on habitat
‐Economic impacts of regulation and marine reserves
‐Impacts on Gulf and estuarine populations
5
Invasive marine and estuarine species
‐Survey whatʹs in there
‐Investigation
impacts,
interactions
‐Research socioeconomic impacts
5
13
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 138/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Changes in coastal demographics; changes in population
density and changes in types of user groups—research how
changes can influence decision/policy making
‐Changing makeup of communities (transitioning from
resource‐dependent, rural)
4
Impacts of tourism and urban development, specifically on
water quality
‐Impacts of dune loss
‐Relationship to harmful algal blooms
‐Relationship to mangroves and submerged aquatic
vegetation (increased vulnerability to sea‐level rise and
humans)
4
Species composition of primary producers and how changing
over time impacts consumers (e.g., relate to oyster health);
hope to
do
in
Swan
Lake
project
‐Phytoplankton species
‐Changes in harmful algal blooms
3
Understanding larval movement and the importance of
specific areas
‐Relative importance different sites
‐Would inform fisheries management
‐Would inform marine reserve placement
‐Would inform industrial activities (e.g. LNG)
‐Aquacultural siting
3
Climate induced changes in ecosystems, coupled with
anthropogenic impacts
‐Movement of organisms; changes in where recruitment
occurs; changes in species composition
2
Global economy’s impacts on Gulf of Mexico tourism >
impacts development in at risk areas, changes in
demographics; impacts who’s fishing
2
Global economy’s impacts of Gulf of Mexico fisheries;
understand changes, impacts to economics of local fisheries 1
Impacts of artificial reefs/role of artificial reefs in distribution
of marine benthic species and other fish species
‐Impacts on fishing in surrounding areas
‐Role in spread of invasives?
1
Monitor seasonal abundances of different kinds of larvae—to
inform oyster restoration work
‐Use genetic bar‐coding to identify larvae
‐Eventually want to use genetic markers to quantify how
much of each kind
1
14
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 139/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Impacts (biotic and abiotic) of offshore oil and gas (liquid
natural gas and seismic activity) on benthic populations,
water quality, and socioeconomic impacts that then result
(e.g., impacts of mercury)
0
Impacts of low dissolved oxygen, trend of declining
dissolved oxygen 0
Impacts of nutrients from offshore aquaculture sites
‐Impacts of nutrients
‐Impacts on fisheries/human use
‐Information placement
‐Research different species
0
More bathymetry (e.g., multi‐ beam) applied to identify
habitats and associated communities 0
Need more information about how to restore mangroves,
how can help natural regeneration after storms 0
Research efficacy of restoration sites over time
‐Site of sites
‐Function, condition/quality
0
Socioeconomic impacts of development in storm/flood‐prone
areas 0
Economic impacts of exotic species and social impacts
(quality of life impacts) 0
Economic impacts of fisheries regulations going on now;
economic impacts of marine reserves 0
Impacts of commercial and recreational fishing on Gulf
populations 0
Impacts of liquid natural gas impacts of seismic activity—
impacts on biotic and abiotic 0
Monitoring over oyster diseases and predator, re.: freshwater
inflows (can inform restoration efforts) 0
Re: freshwater inflow—research delivery of used (processed)
water to confined areas to increase freshwater flow
‐Sammy has work underway—Swan Lake
0
Research how vulnerability to sea‐level rise and hurricanes
changes when lose dunes to development 0
15
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 140/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Information Needs
Animal movement patterns
Compiling historic information on areas impacted by development and areas where did
mitigation/restoration (ID before lose institutional knowledge) o Determine if really no net loss
o Also will help ID priority areas to preserve/conserve
Habitat characterization
Information on species diversity to inform an ecosystem approach especially the non‐charismatic
species (phytoplankton worms)
Lots of basic information needs in Mexico (e.g., oceanographer, fish assessment, habitats)
o Apply new technologies (i.e. sidescan sonar)
On the ground data collection/monitoring needs to be increased; also need to coordinate
Temporal/spatial gaps in data > hard to fill in gaps—need to coordinate monitoring and data
management across diverse topics to get ecosystem approach (e.g., expand SEAMAP surveys)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Education (re: Gulf of Mexico as large system, connections)
Establish offshore aquaculture where will have least impact
Management needs biological, oceanographic, and socioeconomic assessment of Gulf of Mexico as
system applied to improve management/address management issues
Preserve/conserve priority areas (based on analysis of historical data or impacts and mitigation
restoration)
Prevention of invasives and remediation
Select species for offshore aquaculture that will minimize impacts
16
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 141/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Due to group size limitations one breakout group that was comprised of individuals with interest in
“Enhancing Human Health” and/or “The Ocean’s Role in Climate” identified and prioritized research topics
and related needs for both theme areas. The top ranked research priorities from these two theme areas were
presented to the large group for the large voting session.
Research Needs
Table 6. Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Pathogens
‐Reducing E.coli bacteria in coastal waters
‐Correlation between human health and water quality
‐Change in temperature and effects on human water‐ borne
diseases
‐Impacts on ability of coastal wetlands to improve water
quality
‐Impacts on temperature change and vibrio, etc.
‐Change water quality on seafood contaminants and
infectious agents
16
Seafood safety
‐Change in water temperature, runoff, marshes
‐Mercury
‐Affects of water quality inflows on seafood
‐Bioaccumulation
‐Change water quality on seafood contaminants and
infectious agents
‐Impacts on temperature change and vibrio, etc.
15
Disruption of fisheries
‐Endocrine disruptors (pharmaceuticals)
‐Mercury
‐Change water quality on seafood contaminants and
infectious agents
13
Insect borne diseases
‐Betters ways to control mosquitoes without environmental
blowback
‐What is relationship between mosquitoes, wetlands and
malaria?
‐Impacts of spraying
‐Change insect‐ borne diseases?
‐Change water quality on seafood contaminants and
infectious agents
‐Change in temperature and effects on human water‐ borne
diseases
11
17
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 142/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 143/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 144/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 145/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Change in climate related to temperature:
‐Distribution of species
‐Invasive species – how they are changing
‐Stratification of water column
‐Link between fish ecology & climate change
13 Climate
Identify changes in diversity & abundance over time (time
series over & within years) to identify causes
(anthropogenic / climate)
13 Stewardship
Understanding the impact of the Gulf of Mexico Loop
current on
1) Tropical systems
2) Ecosystem resiliency
13 Resilience
Characterize & model community resilience and
sustainability against natural hazards
‐Ecological footprint ‐Built environment
12 Resilience
Develop new physical & biological habitat maps to
determine what resources exist 12 Stewardship
Impacts of tourism & urban development
‐Impacts on water quality
‐Relationship to harmful algal blooms
‐Impacts to mangroves and submerged aquatic vegetation
‐Impacts of dune loss on vulnerability to sea‐level rise &
hurricanes
11 Ecosystem
Interactions between coastal / nearshore morphology &
vegetation and
hurricane
impacts
11 Resilience
Understand larval movement & the importance of specific
areas:
‐Relative importance, different sites
‐Inform fisheries management, marine reserve placement,
industrial activity siting (LNG, aquaculture)
11 Ecosystem
Assess the vulnerability of natural & human communities to
global & local sea‐level rise & the underlying source of
vulnerability
10 Resilience
Pollutants:
‐Pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, metals, etc.; effect
on
fisheries
‐Change in water quality & inflows on pollutants & result
on seafood
10
Human
21
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 146/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 147/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Research & develop techniques for rapid assessment of
bathymetry of ports & harbors (i.e. AUV, side‐scan sonar,
satellite)
6 Operations
What are long‐term changes to coastal sediment budgets? 6 Resilience How will humans respond?
‐Impact of communities
‐Impact of industry
‐Infrastructure breakdown
‐Change in energy usage
5 Climate
Impact of freshwater inflow on lower trophic levels of food
chain & the water quality (nutrients / sediments) 5 Stewardship
Improve forecasts of hurricane intensity 4 Operations
Pharming the sea
‐Pharming the ocean for pharmaceuticals
‐How water quality changes & inflows affect the “pharm”
4 Human
Determine the mean shoreline and common references
(datums) for various sea level measurements 3 Operations
Effects of morphological changes on society relative to:
‐Sea‐level rise
‐Coastline / shoreline changes
‐Development
‐Habitat identification
3 Operations
How often do tsunamis impact the Gulf of Mexico –
magnitude & frequency 3 Resilience
Understand impacts of open loop LNG terminals to
ecosystems 3 Operations
Quantifying climate change – determine / research best
locations & types of in situ sensors needed and temporal
and spatial distributions of measurements
2 Climate
Species composition primary producers & how changing
over time:
‐Phytoplankton species
‐Changes in HAB’s – try to identify triggers / causes
‐Impacts on consumers (e.g. oysters)
2 Ecosystem
Understand / quantify impacts of winter / spring storms 2 Resilience
23
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 148/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 149/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Acknowledgements
This
workshop
would
not
have
been
possible
without
the
support
of
numerous
individuals.
Thank
you
to
all
of the following:
Host:
NOAA Fisheries Service, Galveston Lab (Roger Zimmerman and Ronnie O’Toole)
Sponsors and workshop support:
NOAA National Sea Grant College Program
Texas Sea Grant (Bob Stickney and Ralph Rayburn)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (LaDon Swann, Kay Bruening, and John Grigsby)
Facilitation support:
Gulf Coast Services Center (Heidi Recksiek, Tina Sanchez, and Ann Weaver)
NOAA Sea Grant (Kola Garber)
Texas Sea Grant (John Jacob and Logan Respess)
Workshop participants:
See appendix C.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Principal Investigators:
LaDon Swann, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Charles Wilson, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Bob Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program
Karl Havens, Florida Sea Grant College Program
Transcription support:
Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (Kelly Knowlton)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (Kay Bruening, John Grigsby, Devaney Cheramie,
Loretta Leist, Melissa Schneider, and Valerie Winn)
25
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 150/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Appendix A:
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Workshop Agenda
NOAA Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory
Galveston, Texas
February 28,
2008
10:00 a.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Workshop Agenda
10:00‐10:15 Check‐in, coffee
10:15‐10:40 Welcome and Purpose of the GMRP workshop (all participants)
10:40‐10:45 Small Group Session Goals and Objectives (all participants)
10:45‐11:45 Identify Research Topics within Themes (breakout group)
11:45‐12:10 Break and Pick‐up Lunches
12:10‐1:30 Refine and Prioritize Research Topics—includes breakout group
voting session (breakout group)
1:30‐2:00 Groups Present Top Research Topics for each Theme (all participants)
2:00‐
2:30
Voting
Session
of
all
Research
Topics
(all
participants)
2:30‐2:45 Wrap up (all participants)
26
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 151/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Appendix B:
Process diagram to identify and prioritize research topics at the GMRP workshop
27
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 152/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Appendix C:
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
First Name
Last
Name
Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Jaime
Alvarado
Bremer Texas A&M at Galveston alvaradj@tamug.edu
Kristopher Benson NOAA Restoration Center kristopher.benson@noaa.gov
Douglas Biggs Texas A&M University main campus dbiggs@ocean.tamu.edu
Alan Bunn NOAA/NOS alan.bunn@noaa.gov
Edward Buskey University of Texas ed.buskey@mail.utexas.edu
Piers Chapman Texas A&M University piers.chapman@tamu.edu
Jennifer DeBose NOAA/FGBNMS jennifer.debose@noaa.gov
Winston Denton TPWD Winston.Denton@tpwd.state.tx.us
Rohini Drake Texas A&M University Galveston
Jean Ellis NASA Stennis Space Center jean.t.ellis@nasa.gov
Jorge I.
Euan
‐Avila
CINVESTAV
‐IPN
euan@mda.cinvestav.mx
Kola Garber* NOAA Sea Grant Nikola.Garber@noaa.gov
Gregg Gitschlag NMFS Galveston gregg.gitschlag@noaa.gov
Lisa Gonzalez Houston Advanced Research Center
(HARC) lgonzalez@harc.edu
Gary Graham Texas Sea Grant glgshrimp@embarqmail.com
Joseph Grant NASA Stennis Space Center joseph.grant@nasa.gov
Norman Guinasso Texas A&M University guinasso@tamu.edu
Rebecca Hensley Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept rebecca.hensley@tpwd.state.tx.us
Emma Hickerson NOAA/FGBNMS emma.hickerson@noaa.gov
John Jacob* Texas Sea Grant jjacob@tamu.edu
Steven Johnston Galveston Bay Estuary Program sjohnsto@tceq.state.tx.us Robert L. Joseph U.S. Geological Survey rljoseph@usgs.gov
Bill Kiene NOAA National Marine Sanctuary
Program william.kiene@noaa.gov
Kelly Knowlton Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Kelly.Knowlton‐1@nasa.gov
Jae‐Young Ko Texas A&M at Galveston koj@tamug.edu
Montra Lockwood National Weather Service montra.lockwood@noaa.gov
Heather Miller Texas A&M University hmiller@geo.tamu.edu
Thomas Minello NOAA Fisheries SEFSC tom.minello@noaa.gov
Worth Nowlin GCOOS wnowlin@tamu.edu
Craig Peterson NASA SSC Craig .A. Peterson@NASA.GOV
Antonietta Quigg Texas A&M University at Galveston quigga@tamug.edu
Sammy Ray Texas A&M University‐Galveston rays@tamug.edu
Heidi Recksiek* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center heidi.recksiek@noaa.gov
Logan Respess* Texas Sea Grant l‐respess@tamu.edu
Lance Robinson Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept. Coastal
Fisheries Division lance.robinson@tpwd.state.tx.us
28
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 153/291
GMRP Appendix F
Texas Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name
Last
Name
Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
William Sager Texas A&M University wsager@tamu.edu
Tina Sanchez* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center tina.sanchez@noaa.gov
Anja Schulze TAMUG schulzea@tamug.edu
Elizabeth Scott‐Denton NOAA Fisheries elizabeth.scott‐denton@noaa.gov
Steve Sempier* MASGC stephen.sempier@usm.edu
Safwat Shakir TX GC Env Data Center (TEXGED),
Prairie View A&M University shshakir@pvamu.edu
Elizabeth Shelton Galveston Bay Information Center sheltone@tamug.edu
Douglas Sherman TAMU Geography sherman@geog.tamu.edu
James Simons TPWD james.simons@tpwd.state.tx.us
Sharron Stewart Galveston Bay Foundation sharron@netyeti.com
Bob
Stickney*
Texas Sea
Grant
stickney@tamu.edu
LaDon Swann* MASGC swanndl@auburn.edu
James Tolan Texas Parks and Wildlife Department james.tolan@tpwd.state.tx.us
Michael Turco U S Geological Survey mjturco@usgs.gov
W.M. von Zharen Texas A&M University dr_vonzharen@msn.com
Ann Weaver* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center ann.weaver@noaa.gov
John Wormuth Texas A&M University jwormuth@ocean.tamu.edu
Roger Zimmerman NOAA Fisheries Service roger.zimmerman@noaa.gov
*Workshop facilitator or floater.
29
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 154/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 155/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Background
The purpose of the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan (GMRP) is to identify regional research and information
needs and develop a strategy to address these needs through collaboration with agencies and organizations
that conduct and use Gulf of Mexico‐related research. The project is sponsored by the National Sea Grant
College Program and Gulf of Mexico Sea Grant College Programs. The GMRP is rooted in stakeholder input,
and workshops were one of the primary methods used to collect this input. Workshops were held in each
Gulf of Mexico state and supported by numerous individuals (see acknowledgements section). This report
provides the results from the workshop at the Louisiana State University Energy, Coast and Environment
Building, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
The workshop agenda (appendix A) was designed to identify high‐priority research topics related to the six
societal themes described in the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology’s 2007 document
“Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States for the Next Decade—An Ocean Research
Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy.” The themes included:
stewardship of natural and cultural ocean resources,
increasing resilience to natural hazards,
enabling marine operations, the ocean’s role in climate,
improving ecosystem health, and
enhancing human health.
A process (appendix B) was developed to allow workshop participants (appendix C) to efficiently develop a
list of research priorities in a limited amount of time. Participants were divided into breakout groups by
theme area to discuss specific research topics, information needs, and other topics that related to their theme
area. Individuals in the breakout group then voted for the research topics discussed in their session that they
believed were most important. The eight to ten topics with the highest votes were then presented to all
workshop participants. All workshop participants then voted for these top research topics across all theme
areas.
This report presents 1) the results of the breakout group voting for each theme area, 2) the non‐research
topics discussed in each breakout group, and 3) the results of the large group voting session across all theme
areas.
If you will be using the information provided in this report for planning or other purposes we would like to
hear from you. For more information about the Gulf of Mexico Research Planning effort or to share how you
will be using the results of the GMRP workshop(s) please contact Steve Sempier, Gulf of Mexico Research
Planning Coordinator, at stephen.sempier@usm.edu.
You can also learn more about the GMRP at the project’s web site at: masgc.org/gmrp.
31
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 156/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Breakout Group Results
Participants in each themed breakout group identified research needs and voted for the research topics they
believed were most important. Each participant was provided eight votes and they could place up to two
votes on an individual research topic.
Prior to the voting session some breakout groups combined multiple ideas that were mentioned during the
brainstorming session, and therefore crossed out similar ideas so that they would not be available during the
voting session. The tables below include all comments written on the flip chart paper, and those topics that
were crossed out on the flip chart paper are indicated with a strike through in the ta ble.
Information needs and policy, management, and education related topics were also captured in the breakout
group sessions but were not voted on for the prioritization process. The results of these discussions are also
included under each themed heading.
32
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 157/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Due to the large number of participants in the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” there
were two separate breakout groups that performed a brainstorming session. After the brainstorming session
the two groups merged and combined topics. Members of both breakout groups voted for the combined
topics. The table below is the combined topics that were discussed and voting results.
Research Needs
Table 1. Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” breakout
groups and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Long term restoration and ecosystem trajectories from
different perspectives 12
Valuation of key aquatic indicator species and non‐market
resources in coastal areas. Economic incentives for
landowners and public
10
Effects of river diversions (site specific) 9
Freshwater quantity and quality around Gulf of Mexico (ex:
TX vs. MS) and relationship to health of estuary and ripple
to cultural/coastal community
8
Benefits and costs of restoration (including modeling) 8
Impact of trawling on cultural resources and where they are 7
Borrow areas—effect on:
‐Water quality
‐Fisheries
‐Sediment processes
6
Placement of fine sediment ‐Water quality
‐Marshes
‐Processes/habitat utilization
6
Understand adaptation to habitat loss and archiving and
understanding lost cultural resources (socio/cultural) 6
Research historic and prehistoric past human densities in
coastal zones 6
Local social understanding of benefits/burdens of restoration
efforts 6
Human use patterns
Relationship of
oyster
reef
structure,
biomass,
and
health
to
water quality as it relates to oyster fisheries industry
throughout Gulf (at a regional scale)
5
Impacts of hypoxia to fisheries and non‐consumptive species 5
How large structures (leaky levees) affect coastal processes in
restoration 5
Re‐assess mass‐wasting of sediments‐fluidized mud 5
Response of Lake Pontchartrain and Mississippi Sound to
closure of MRGO (Mississippi River Gulf Outlet) 4
33
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 158/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 1 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean
Resources” breakout groups and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Fisheries: access, ownership, allocation
‐How do we allocate: cultural, social, or economic 3
Corrosion/leaking rate and effect of depth of ships sunk
during World War II 3
Determine legacy of organic loading in hypoxia 3
Long and short term responses of coastal processes to large
storms 3
Update understanding of land/water linkages in Mississippi
Basin and Gulf—local policies to reflect this 3
Research maritime history/inventory cultural sites 3
Flux of freshwater/saltwater in geological materials 3
Feasibility of revitalizing low salinity estuaries 2
Effect on water quality from industrial processes (oil and gas)
(strategic reserve) 1
Natural history of Gulf of Mexico benthic habitats (are they
still viable) 0
Identify the genomes within a species that are salt tolerant as
we move inland 0
Results of human use of resources extraction or change and
the influence on future job markets 0
Downline affects of restoration efforts, etc. 0
Quantify/qualify migratory bird habitat in relation to
recovery efforts 0
Best avenues for determining behavioral and economic
impacts of environmental practices 0
Implications of hardening shorelines 0
Alternative energy sources 0
Diversion and hurricane impact on invasive species 0
Valuation of human use activities in coastal zones 0
Non market valuation innovation research 0
Sediment‐what happens to marshes and other estuarine
habitats with movement of sediment 0
What happens to the borrow areas extraction/dump sites to
water quality 0
Effect of cave (salt brine water) clearing on Pascagoula and
Gulf of Mexico salinity 0
How to model (help manage) “living” ecology and the
resulting economics 0
Models that predict what animals need and the resulting
restoration economics 0
34
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 159/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 1 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean
Resources” breakout groups and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
System changes due to finer particulate movement by
dredging and placement 0
How does the extraction site fill up and how does it move
(quality of the material) 0
What is the impact of pulling water from Gulf to cool natural
gas plans and LNG 0
Response of community freshwater resources to coastal
changes 0
Impacts to water quality and fisheries of deep borrow areas
produced by sediment mining 0
Impacts of leveling oyster reef on mitigating storm effects 0
Research on Pleistocene spread of humans 0
Long term eutrophication impacts and restoration trajectories 0
35
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 160/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 161/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Research Needs
Table 2. Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Real Time ‐ Predicting Systems
‐Predict response of built environment to hazards modeling
‐Improve boundary effects, forcing bottom vs. surface,
consider predicting surface waves, compare responses
from different topographic/ landscape vegetated features,
vegetated cover (modeling)
17
How do preservation, restoration actions impact
communities and economic activities?
What is 30 year impact of constructing a levee?
How do levees alter natural flow patters of storm surge? (modeling)
14
Measure peopleʹs (citizens and decision makers)
understanding of vulnerability & what they can do to
reduce impact
‐Explore behavioral science
‐Partnership to translate & communicate technical data
for improved risk based decisions
‐How to measure a communityʹs resiliency
11
Protection of critical infrastructure ‐ highways, bridges,
utilities, hospitals, shelters ‐ research on reducing
vulnerability
10
Understand, quantify, predict impacts to first line of natural
defense ‐ barrier island, shoreline 10
Effects of natural hazards on water quality & living resources
‐ Field work & remote sensing techniques & modeling 9
What makes habitat more resilient?
Are restored habitats more or less resilient? 8
What is relationship/impacts to community leaders careers
RE: land use decisions in hazard areas and to past case
study decisions where good decisions were made
5
Research toward ̋believableʺ scientific projections of future
coastal conditions
4
Predictive models for marine debris
‐Industrial
‐What goes where & what are best methods to secure ‐
(under development by NOAA)
‐Improved mapping of debris fields
1
What are best ways to mitigate damage to natural systems? 1
37
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 162/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 2 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Are certain coastal forests more resilient than others?
(fresh vs. salt habitats)
‐What improved species can be used?
‐What are critical aspects of these habitats?
0
Development of coastal flooding or tidal real time predicting
system ‐ more meteorology data…not limited to surge or
seasons or extreme events (modeling)
0
How does altered hydrology affect future impacts of storms ‐
look at interaction of different development types 0
Social modeling of impacts 0
What is level of vulnerability of (built environment) critical
infrastructure? Assessment of baseline conditions compared
to different level events
0
Information Needs
Compile recovery knowledge ‐ lessons learned
Get post Katrina baseline data then follow with regular data collection
Policy, Management or Education Topics
(none provided)
38
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 163/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Research Needs
Table 3. Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Research into alternative (to reefs) sustainable ʺuseʺ of de‐
commissioned platforms (alternate energy; aquaculture;
eco‐tourism; weather meteorological stations)
‐Assumes ʺleft in placeʺ
10
Documentation of significant verses perceived impacts of off‐
shore aquaculture (biological and ecological);
‐Structure type
‐Mariculture on Gulf of Mexico
‐Must precede permitting (e.g. permitting issues) onsite analyses; small demonstration
‐Learning curve here
9
Strategic planning on regional transport linkages
(port barge‐rail‐track)
‐ʺIntermodal̋
‐Maximum economic and environmental efficiencies
(transport mileage‐include metrics = carbon footprint)
8
Socio‐economic characterization of the coast fishing
communities
research and economic alternatives
(transitioning aquaculture)
7
Potential impacts of oil‐gas activities in deepwater (>1000
meter) habitats 7
Research into aquaculture ʺgrow‐outʺ technologies (net pens;
recirculation systems (land))
Goal: stock enhancement and food security
6
Identify ʺcandidateʺ species
‐Species selection for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture
(land‐ based or offshore)
‐Economic/marketing/production/genetics
5
39
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 164/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 165/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Information Needs
Gulf of Mexico (GMFMC) does not have good info on socio economic (fishing community)
Identify and define legal pathways for reliable emergency marine services center use
Lack of species selection information for land‐ based and offshore aquaculture
Need a better understanding about stake holders in marine operations (IOOS; GCOOS; etc.)
Need better ʺregimeʺ on ocean ʺuseʺ
o Re: aquaculture, shellfish
Quality of ʺsafe harborsʺ (harbors of refuge) for foul weather protection
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Awareness RE: ʺcarbon footprint̋ or transport miles of environmental benefit of shipping (decrease
carbon costs)
Increase
education
and
outreach
for
the
general
public
o RE: aquaculture (offshore)
Increase outreach into incorporating existing communication of fishermen into aquaculture
Policy
o RE: permitting for offshore aquaculture
o need a way to permit this…
o ʺoffbottomʺ aquaculture too
41
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 166/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Research Needs
Table 4. Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting results from
the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Sea‐level rise & storm surge interaction: areas of concern:
As a result in seal level rise:
‐Salt water intrusion
‐Cultural
‐Improve understanding of storm surge
‐Change ecosystems
‐Change in coastal flooding: improve elevation
‐Infrastructure
‐Tax base
‐Agriculture
‐Human health
‐Changing wetland composition
9
As climate change is occurring (i.e. rainfall
patterns/distribution, river flows) improve understanding
of freshwater inflows, distribution, and use (past, present
and future) including river flows and rainfall in the coast ‐‐‐
physical and biological changes.
‐Historic geologic history of river flow patterns in past.
How did it bring us to today and where will this
take us?
8
Improve understanding
of
carbon
flux
and
implications;
properties of Gulf of Mexico change and impact
methane/carbon dioxide
7
Interaction of loop current with weather: how does it change
with changes in the ocean (salinity, upwellings, coastal
interactions, ocean temperatures)?
How is the loop current affected by ENSO: Northern
Atlantic Oscillation?
7
Hypoxia: Improve understanding of hypoxia: How will
climate change interact (more or less?) in conjunction with
temperature, nitrogen, phosphorus, endocrine disruptions,
algal blooms?
6
Improving knowledge of the effects of storms due to climate
change (i.e. number, frequency strength) path 6
42
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 167/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 4 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting
results from the breakout group voting session.
Economic impacts of climate change, i.e.:
‐Maritime commerce
‐Oil / gas activities
‐Fisheries ‐Levees / barrier islands
‐Infrastructure tax base
5
Improve understanding of how organisms and plants will
change with climate change (physical, geographic regions) 4
Quantify the rate of change or melt (glacier and snow)
and where (Antarctic and Arctic) 2
Climate, ocean, coastal interaction; coastal surface and water
interactions 0
Quantify the impacts of radiation effects on biota due to
global climate change 0
As a result in seal level rise need research on change: salt water intrusion, change in sediment deposition; coastal
flooding (temp; permanent)
0
Better models for elevations improved methods 0
Change of storm surge / wetland interaction 0
Improving knowledge of hurricane frequency and strength
and path ocean / atmosphere interaction enter into Gulf and
play
0
Interaction of storm system with the coast
Effects of storms due to climate change (i.e. #, frequency,
strength)
0
Under ocean temperatures as relates to climate change
Improve understanding of ocean temperatures 0
43
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 168/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Information Needs
Continuous data
Expand elevation data knowledge ‐ more frequent surveys and more density
Higher and higher resolution bathymetry / LIDAR (better data) More sensors in Gulf of Mexico
Need more coastal and subsurface geological data
Pool evaluation data
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Data consistencies from ocean to land
Effects of climate change on coastal restoration and coastal development
Engage other agencies
Engagement
of
local,
state,
regional
governance
(on
climate
change
(multi
‐disciplinary)
o How use this information to mitigate?
Heavy participation by Army Corps of Engineers
Hypoxia prediction
National policies on flood insurance
o Should we rebuild here?
o Draft policy on climate change & how to mitigate
What to do with private property?
44
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 169/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Due to the large number of participants in the “Improving Ecosystem Health” there were two separate
breakout groups that performed a brainstorming session. After the brainstorming session the two groups
merged and combined topics. Members of both breakout groups voted for the combined topics. The table
below is the combined topics that were discussed and voting results.
Research Needs
Table 5. Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout groups and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
What is ecosystem health
‐Need to figure out how to measure
‐Need larger suite of indicators and better understanding of
how it relates
‐Indicators
of
ecosystem
health
‐Have many metrics, but not ecosystem functions
‐Further define metrics for evaluation ‐ broad ecosystems
(e.g. fish communities)
17
River diversions/ sediment management
‐Shoaling impacts
‐Sediment impacts on habitats & species
‐ID optimal use & allocation of sediment
‐Diversion effects on water quality, marshland populations
13
Ecosystem significance of shifts in habitat types (especially
vegetative changes) that are occurring in Louisiana
‐Define
factors
causing
these
shifts
11
Evaluate total potential of Mississippi River for restoration:
including management/inputs basin, especially sediment,
freshwater volume, nutrients ‐ Atchafalaya/Miss optimal
distribution
11
Understanding hydrologic requirements of healthy marsh
ecosystems
‐Freshwater influence flotant (floating marsh)
‐Hydrology other coastal wetlands
11
Non‐native species
‐Impacts on coastal systems
‐Modeling effects, potential pathways of introduction
‐Risk analysis & control potential
‐Inventory threats
‐ID sources/ vectors, pathways
10
Impacts of global climate change on local ecosystems
‐Range extensions of ecosystem
‐Develop flexible ecosystem models to predict local impacts 9
Research on forested wetlands/coastal forests to understand
ecosystem function & resilience ( e.g. to hurricanes) 8
45
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 170/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout groups and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Economics research
‐Economics of habitat loss and restoration
‐Economics important for identifying trade‐offs, can also be
part of incentives for behavior change
‐Model economics of ecosystem shifts
‐Look at benefit, costs, distribution across interests
‐“Atlantis” model from Australia good (e.g. of one that
includes economics)
7
Understanding human/public attitudes and perceptions
‐Incorporate into models
‐Important for identifying trade‐offs
‐Research what incentives/motivations will work, e.g.:
‐Get landowners to participate in eco‐friendly
development)
‐Social
science
research
into
what
people
think
about
restoration, their understanding
7
Define outer boundaries anthropogenic input to Gulf &
assess cultural impacts for example as they relate to:
‐Oil platforms
‐Impacts of ecosystem health & production
‐Fishing
5
Hypoxia effects distribution, abundance, recruitment &
mortality in fish and invertebrates – North Gulf – especially
impacts in the Gulf east of Mississippi River
5
Impacts/connections re:
‐Discharges
&
run
‐off
(impacts
to
freshwater
&
coastal
waters) & research into ways to control metals
‐Impacts on sediment, bacteria
‐Ultimate fate & transport of pollutants (nutrients) inland to
the Gulf
‐Efficacy of different run‐off management
strategies/structures
‐Effectiveness of Best Management Practices
5
Natural variability – still don’t know how much variability is
natural in a healthy system (e.g. brown marsh) 5
46
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 171/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout groups and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Coastal plains land use/ land cover
‐Understand impacts to estuarine and Gulf (conveyance
from riparian to other two systems)
‐Systems approach to 3 systems ‐Look at riverine as well
4
Need to create an analysis framework based on existing and
future quantitative and predictive models
‐Weave models together to look at large scale and
evaluate scenarios
‐Combine individual models of marsh states and use by
species (use to inform)
‐ Hydrodynamic modeling
‐“Ecospace” model (will be able to evaluate restoration
alternatives on basin scale)
‐Check
applicability
of
existing
models
to
Louisiana
(may
need to tweak a bit)
‐“LACES” model might be one to look at (discussed in
Louisiana during CPRA process)
4
Offshore aquaculture
‐Impacts of releases, nutrients, metals from structures,
other toxics
‐Look at new user conflicts
4
Research potential beneficial use of discharge (e.g.
wastewater to wetlands work and New Orleans sewage
board)
‐
Look
at
ecological,
economic,
technological
(e.g.
active
project in Hammond)
4
Characterize structure & function of offshore (deepwater)
biology
‐Define “health”
‐Status
‐Regional baseline
‐Soft sediment
‐Hard sediment
‐Water column
‐Estimate indicators
3
47
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 172/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Barrier Islands
‐Separating natural dynamics from anthropogenic
influences to better manage anthropogenic inputs
‐Analysis of previous & current restoration
2
Develop methods to address disturbances to bottom
community structure from fisheries activities
‐Mitigate active fishing gear impacts
2
Develop real‐time 3‐D model of Gulf circulation 2
Flows between systems
‐Offshore to freshwater (across coastal system)
‐Movement of species, carbon flows (e.g. Atchafalaya good
place to do this study)
2
New measures of coastal wetland productivity
‐Especially anthropogenic effects 2
Impacts of wind power (e.g. on flyways) ‐Wind patterns
‐Feasibility (should we pursue)
‐Look at new user conflicts (trade‐offs, socioeconomic
issues)
0
Integration of coastal observing systems & technologies to
facilitate ecosystem approach ‐ there is some going on, but
need more information
0
Need to define historical baselines for ecosystems
‐Use historical information to define targets
‐Identify trade‐offs in management alternatives (affect
different users
in
different
ways)
0
Role of Mississippi River flow in isolating populations 0
Understand function of habitats
‐Highlighting production, fish condition
‐Impacts of habitat loss plus impacts of restoration (e.g.
marshland , oyster, natural ridges)
0
48
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 173/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
The information needs described below came from both breakout groups that discussed issues related to
“Improving Ecosystem Health.”
Information Needs
Better bathymetric data for region
Centralized database for existing data & models
o Inventory of existing data (e.g. fishing licenses, alligator catch data, to bldg permits)
Expand collection baseline data ‐ OOS
Forested wetlands
Information on availability of sediments ‐ where & when
Monitoring data
o Gulf wide database
Need standards, metadata process to help organize & manage data (e.g. NASA working on
ʺCOASTʺ (coastal online assessment & synthesis tool) intended to facilitate harmonization of data,
synthesis)
Role of oyster/shell reefs on water quality & how it affects whole system
Policy, Management or Education Topics
(none provided)
49
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 174/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Research Needs
Table 6. Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Discovery of drugs and natural products from marine and
coastal environments
‐Can you synthesize these compounds?
‐Phytoplankton waste processing turn into value added
products
11
Warming Changing temperature, effect on seafood/ marine
resources and content, seafood distribution (microbial,
safety)
8
Consumption of fish and shellfish
‐Chronic health/hazard or benefits ‐ Is it creating
inclusion of known at risk groups?
5
Determining Enhancing, incorporating the health impacts of
omega‐3 fatty acid in seafood that is normally low 5
Research to devise antibody based assay for biotoxins for
fish/shellfish
‐ Cheap, quick for restaurants
5
Stimulate coastal development to maximize “health /
lifestyleʺ benefits and minimize risk/hazard (e.g. bike path,
vegetable path)
‐Resilience (designing infrastructure to withstand hazards)
‐ʺHealthy
sustainable
coastal
growth
ʺ
5
Determine amount of mercury pollutants (biological /
chemical) contaminant of seafood
‐Is it a problem in the Gulf of Mexico?
4
Determining / quantify human benefits of coastal living
‐Mental health benefits of recreational activities: sailing,
swimming
‐ When does overuse become detrimental?
4
Identify alternative resources for energy (e.g. wind, wave,
current).
‐Identify potential impacts
‐Green
versus
oil
industry
and
human
impacts?
4
Improve our understanding of the spatial aspects of health
resource locations and delivery in coastal areas (hospitals,
clinics, community‐ based schools, etc.)
during post storm conditions
4
Verification of vibrio risk assessment
(risk assessment has not been completed yet) 4
Educating inland residents about coastal health hazards 3
Health services infrastructure during storms 3
50
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 175/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 6 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Impact of coastal development on coastal heritage /
communities / culture 2
Understand and identify problems
‐Coastal process, wetland processes (and how Louisiana is
loosing theirs), land loss and how it impacts human
health
2
Understand consumer demand analysis changes for ocean
products in the face of adverse events 2
Clearer understanding of blue‐green algae (versus HAB)
other diatoms 1
Does length of tenure living in coast impact your
stewardship? 0
How do we prioritize what we look for regarding
pharmaceutical products? 0
Think more than products we get from ocean: tourism 0
Where do we look for pharmaceutical products in the ocean? 0
Information Needs
(none provided)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Avoid consumer misconception‐conception
Educating inland resident about health hazard at coast Effective education on HAB’s
Improve education regarding individual responsibility for water quality
Improve federal matching funding for rural and urban sewage treatment and non‐point source
pollution
51
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 176/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Overall Results—Research Priorities Determined in Large Group Voting
Session
The research topics presented in Table 7 were derived from the highest rated topics from each of the themed
breakout groups. The column titled, “Theme,” in Table 7 corresponds to the breakout group from which the
research topic originated. The following codes were used: stewardship of natural and cultural ocean
resources (Stewardship), increasing resilience to natural hazards (Resilience), improving ecosystem health
(Ecosystem), enabling marine operations (Operations), enhancing human health (Human), and the ocean’s
role in climate (Climate).
Each participant had 12 votes for the large group voting session and could place up to two votes for any one
research topic.
Note that in some cases research topics presented by different breakout groups were very similar. An in‐
depth analysis of similar topics identified within and between workshops will be discussed in a later report.
Table 7. Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme areas.
Research Topic Votes Theme
Sea‐level rise & storm surge interactions
Areas of concern:
‐Salt water intrusion
‐Cultural change
‐Change in ecosystems
‐Change in coastal flooding; improve elevation
‐Agriculture
‐Human health
‐Wetland composition
40 Climate
Benefits & costs of restoration (including modeling) 36 Stewardship
River diversion / sediment management
‐Shoaling impacts
‐Sediment impacts on habitats & species
‐Identify optimal use & allocation of sediment
‐Diversion effects on water quality & marshland populations
36 Ecosystem
Discovery of pharmaceuticals & natural (bio) products from
marine and coastal environments 31 Human
Evaluate total potential of Mississippi River for restoration:
management & inputs from Mississippi basin
‐Sediment, freshwater volume, nutrients
‐Optimal
distribution
of
Atchafalaya
/ Mississippi
rivers
31 Ecosystem
Understanding hydrologic requirements of healthy marsh
ecosystems
‐Freshwater influence on flow time
‐Hydrology of other coastal wetlands
29 Ecosystem
52
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 177/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Research into alternative (to reefs) sustainable ʺuseʺ of
de‐commissioned platforms
‐e.g. Alternative energy
‐Aquaculture
‐Eco‐tourism
‐Weather stations
28
Operations
Development of real time predictive model that includes
meteorological data, appropriate land use / land cover and
improved boundary data (not just hurricanes)
26 Resilience
Ecosystem health indicators
‐Need to figure out how to measure
‐More indicators needed
‐Better define metrics for ecosystem evaluations
26 Ecosystem
Placement of fine sediment
‐Water quality ‐Marshes
‐Habitat utilization
‐Processes
22 Stewardship
Research into aquaculture ʺgrow‐outʺ technologies… net pens,
re‐circulation systems, etc.
‐Goal = stock enhancement, food security
22 Operations
Borrow areas effect on
‐Water quality
‐Fisheries
‐Sediment processes
21 Stewardship
Measure citizens
ʹand
decision
makers
ʹunderstanding
of
vulnerability and how to translate / communicate technical
data to improve decisions
21 Resilience
Economic impacts of climate change
i.e. maritime / commerce
‐Oil / gas activities
‐Fisheries
‐Levees / barrier islands
‐Infrastructure
‐Tax base
20 Climate
Research historic sites & prehistoric human densities in
coastal
zones
19 Stewardship
Socio‐economic characterization of Gulf coast fishing
communities
‐Research into economic alternatives, e.g. transitioning or
aquaculture
19 Operations
53
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 178/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Non‐native species
‐Impacts on coastal systems
‐Modeling pathways of introduction
‐Risk analysis & control potential ‐Inventory & prioritize threats
‐Identify source, vectors
18
Ecosystem
Long term restoration & ecosystem trajectories from different
perspectives 17 Stewardship
Documentation of biological/ecological impacts of offshore
aquaculture on Gulf of Mexico
‐Significant / perceived
‐Precedes individual permitting issues
‐Small demonstration project (on‐site analyses)
16 Operations
Assess level of vulnerability of built environment, baseline
condition, and research how to reduce losses 15 Resilience
Impacts of global climate change on local ecosystems
‐Range extensions
‐Develop flexible ecosystem models to predict local impacts
15 Ecosystem
Ecosystem significance of shifts in habitat type (especially
vegetative) that are occurring in Louisiana
‐Define factors causing these shifts and impacts on
ecosystem function
14 Ecosystem
Strategic planning on regional transportation linkages
‐Port ‐ barge ‐ rail ‐ truck
‐Increase maximum economic & environmental efficiencies
‐Including
metrics
(e.g.
carbon
footprint)
14 Operations
Impacts of trawling & location of cultural resources 13 Stewardship
Effects of river diversions 12 Stewardship
Pollutant / nutrient dynamics & efficacy of pollutant
management strategies
‐Fate & transport of pollutants, nutrients ‐ inland to the Gulf
‐Impacts / connections of freshwater discharge
‐Efficacy of BMPs / management techniques (including
controlling structures)
12 Ecosystem
Understand adaptation to habitat loss & archive lost cultural
resources (social & cultural) 12 Stewardship
Understand, quantify,
predict
impacts
to
first
line
of
natural
defense (e.g. islands) 12 Resilience
Valuation of key non‐market aquatic resources & indicator
species 12 Stewardship
Potential impact of oil & gas activities in deepwater habitats
(>1000 m) 11 Operations
54
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 179/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Freshwater quantity & quality around Gulf of Mexico &
relationship to health of estuary & ripple to cultural &
coastal community
10 Stewardship
Identify species selection for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture
‐Land‐ based & offshore
‐Economics / production / genetics / etc.
10 Operations
As climate change is occurring (i.e. rainfall patterns,
distribution, frequency, river flows) improve understanding
of freshwater movement, distribution, & use ‐ past / present /
future
9 Climate
Hypoxia ‐ improve understanding
‐How will climate change interact in conjunction with
temperature, nitrogen, phosphate, & endocrine disruptors
8 Climate
Interaction of Loop Current with weather
‐How does it change with changes in the ocean (i.e. salinity, upwelling, coastal interaction, and ocean temperature)
8 Climate
Research looking at hypoxic effects on ecosystems 8 Stewardship
Improve knowledge of the effects of storms (i.e. number,
frequency, strength, path) due to climate change 7 Climate
Determine what makes different habitats more resilient 6 Resilience
Improve understanding of how organisms / plants will change
with climate change (physical & geographic regions);
including quantify impacts of radiation effects on biota
6 Climate
Increase consumption / utilization of alternative energy
resources that reduce environmental impact, thus increase
human health benefits
6 Human
Local social understanding of benefits / burdens on restoration 6 Stewardship
Study impacts of natural hazards on water quality and living
resources 6 Resilience
Develop a simple and rapid method to measure contaminants
in seafood 5 Human
Improve understanding of carbon flux & implications (i.e. CO2
and methane) 5 Climate
Effect of climate change on seafood quality and safety 4 Human
Determine amount of pollutants (biological & chemical) in
seafood within the Gulf of Mexico 3 Human
How do preservation, restoration actions impact (intended and
unintended) communities? 3 Resilience
How do previous land use decisions affect careers of
community leaders, e.g. lack of regulations enforcement or
positions re: limiting development
3 Resilience
55
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 180/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Improve our understanding of the spatial aspects of our health
service resources locations / delivery in coastal areas 3 Human
Research on ̋believableʺ scientific projections of future coastal
conditions 3
Resilience
Stimulate coastal development to maximize health &
minimize risk 3 Human
Verification of FDA Vibrio risk assessments 2 Human
Determine potential chronic health hazards / benefits due to
the consumption of seafood, including known at‐risk groups1 Human
Quantify the rate of change of glacier & snow melt (i.e. Arctic
& Antarctic) & where 1 Climate
Enhance seafood quality with omega‐3 fatty acids 0 Human
56
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 181/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Acknowledgements
This workshop would not have been possible without the support of numerous individuals. Thank you to all
of the following:
Host:
Louisiana State University‐‐Energy, Coast and Environment Building (Versa Stickle)
Sponsors and workshop support:
NOAA National Sea Grant College Program
Louisiana Sea Grant (Chuck Wilson and Dave Nieland)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (LaDon Swann, Kay Bruening, and John Grigsby)
Facilitation support:
Gulf Coast Services Center (Heidi Recksiek, Tina Sanchez, and Ann Weaver)
Louisiana Sea
Grant
(Dave
Nieland,
Justin
Farrell,
Glen
Thomas)
NASA Stennis Space Center (Jean Ellis)
NOAA Sea Grant (Kola Garber)
Workshop participants:
See appendix C.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Principal Investigators:
LaDon Swann, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Charles Wilson, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Bob Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program
Karl
Havens,
Florida
Sea
Grant
College
Program
Transcription support:
Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (Kelly Knowlton)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (Kay Bruening, John Grigsby, Devaney Cheramie,
Loretta Leist, Melissa Schneider, and Valerie Winn)
57
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 182/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Appendix A:
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Workshop Agenda
Louisiana State University Energy, Coast and Environment Building
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
February 26,
2008
10:00 a.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Workshop Agenda
10:00‐10:15 Check‐in, coffee
10:15‐10:40 Welcome and Purpose of the GMRP workshop (all participants)
10:40‐10:45 Small Group Session Goals and Objectives (all participants)
10:45‐11:45 Identify Research Topics within Themes (breakout group)
11:45‐12:10 Break and Pick‐up Lunches
12:10‐1:30 Refine and Prioritize Research Topics—includes breakout group
voting session (breakout group)
1:30‐2:00 Groups Present Top Research Topics for each Theme (all participants)
2:00‐
2:30
Voting
Session
of
all
Research
Topics
(all
participants)
2:30‐2:45 Wrap up (all participants)
58
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 183/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Appendix B:
Process diagram to identify and prioritize research topics at the GMRP workshop
59
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 184/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Appendix C:
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
First
Name
Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Dave
Ball
Minerals Management
Service
david.ball@mms.gov
Don Baltz LSU dbaltz@lsu.edu
Ronald Becker LA Sea Grant rbecker@lsu.edu
Mark Benfield LSU Oceanography & Coastal Sciences mbenfie@lsu.edu
Pam Blanchard LSU Educational Theory, Policy, and
Practice PamB@LSU.EDU
Harry Blanchet La. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries hblanchet@wlf.louisiana.gov
Kevin Boswell LSU‐ DOCS kboswe1@lsu.edu
David Bourgeois LA Sea Grant Marine Extension Program dbourgeois@agctr.lsu.edu
Rex Caffey LSU Sea Grant rcaffey@agctr.lsu.edu
Rafael Calderon The Nature Conservancy rafael_calderon@tnc.org
Q. Jim Chen LSU qchen@lsu.edu
Jim Cowan LSU jhcowan@lsu.edu
Doug Daigle CREST Program dougdaigle@gmail.com
Todd Davison NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center todd.davison@noaa.gov
Michele Deshotels Louisiana CPRA Implementation Team michele.deshotels@la.gov
Douglas Drennan Aquaculture Systems Tech, LLC douglas@beadfilters.com
Eurico D’Sa Louisiana State University ejdsa@lsu.edu
James Ebeling Aquaculture Systems Technology, LLC James@Beadfilters.com
Jean Ellis* NASA Stennis Space Center jean.t.ellis@nasa.gov
Brooks Ellwood Louisiana State University ellwood@lsu.edu
Deborah Epperson Minerals Management Service deborah.epperson@mms.gov
Roger Erickson National Weather Service roger.erickson@noaa.gov
Amanda Evans Tesla Offshore, LLC evansa@teslaoffshore.com
Garen Evans Mississippi State University Extension
Service gevans@ext.msstate.edu
Justin Farrell* Louisiana Sea Grant jfarrell@lsu.edu
John Finley Louisiana State University jfinley@agcenter.lsu.edu
John Foret NOAA Fisheries Service john.foret@noaa.gov
Carol Franze LSU Ag Center/Sea Grant Program cfranze@agcenter.lsu.edu
Kola Garber* NOAA Sea Grant nikola.garber@noaa.gov
M. E. Betsy Garrison LSU College of Agriculture hcgarr@lsu.edu
Rusty Gaude LSU Sea Grant agaude@agcenter.lsu.edu
Linda Gauthier St. Louis King of France School lgauth1@lsu.edu
Tre Glenn MMS tre.glenn@mms.gov
Bill Graham NASA william.d.graham@nasa.gov
60
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 185/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Bren Haase
Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources bren.haase@la.gov
Don Hayes University of Louisiana at Lafayette hayes@louisiana.edu
Haosheng Huang LSU, Department of Oceanography and
Coastal Sciences hhuang7@lsu.edu
Thomas Hymel LA Sea Grant thymel@agctr.lsu.edu
Jack Irion MMS jack.irion@mms.gov
Kelly Knowlton SSAI Kelly.Knowlton‐1@nasa.gov
Roy Kron Louisiana Sea Grant rkron@lsu.edu
Jerome La Peyre LSU Ag Center jlapeyre@agctr.lsu.edu
Megan La Peyre USGS mlapey@lsu.edu
Paul
LaRock
Louisiana State
University
oclaro@lsu.edu
Dawn Lavoie USGS dlavoie@usgs.gov
Edward Laws Louisiana State University edlaws@lsu.edu
Brian LeBlanc LSU AgCenter/Sea Grant bleblanc@agctr.lsu.edu
Jack Losso Department of Food Science jlosso@lsu.edu
C. Greg Lutz LSU AgCenter / Sea Grant glutz@agcenter.lsu.edu
Hassan Mashriqui Louisiana State University & Sea Grant cemash@lsu.edu
Nelson May NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Nelson.May@noaa.gov
Terry McPherson NASA Applied Sciences terry.r.mcpherson@nasa.gov
Riley Milner Louisiana Geological Survey lmilne1@lsu.edu
Robert Moreau SLU‐Turtle Cove ERS rmoreau@selu.edu
Mike Murphy The Nature Conservancy mike_murphy@tnc.org
Richard Neill USDA‐NRCS richard.neill@la.usda.gov
Dave Nieland* Louisiana Sea Grant dniela@lsu.edu
Ebenezer Ogunyinka LA Department of Wildlife and Fisheries eogunyinka@wlf.louisiana.gov
Paula Ouder Louisiana Sea Grant pouder@lsu.edu
James Pahl Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources james.pahl@la.gov
Andy Patrick NOAA National Weather Service Andy.Patrick@noaa.gov
Craig Peterson NASA SSC Craig.A.Peterson@NASA.GOV
Aaron Pierce Nicholls State University aaron.pierce@nicholls.edu
Rick Raynie LDNR Coastal Restoration Richard.Raynie@LA.gov
Heidi Recksiek* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center heidi.recksiek@noaa.gov
David Reed NWS Lower Mississippi River Forecast
Center dave.reed@noaa.gov
Amitava Roy CAMD, Louisiana State University reroy@lsu.edu
Lawrence Rozas NOAA Fisheries Service SEFSC lawrence.rozas@noaa.gov
61
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 186/291
GMRP Appendix F
Louisiana Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Paul W. Sammarco
Louisiana Universities Marine
Consortium (LUMCON) psammarco@lumcon.edu
Tina Sanchez* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center tina.sanchez@noaa.gov
Kevin A. Savoie LSU AgCenter/Sea Grant ksavoie@agcenter.lsu.edu
Mark Schexnayder LA Sea Grant mschexnayder@agcenter.lsu.edu
Warren Schulingkamp Louisiana Geological Survey warrenii@lsu.edu
Martha Segura NPS Gulf Coast Network martha_segura@nps.gov
Steve Sempier* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium stephen.sempier@usm.edu
Richard Shaw LSU rshaw@lsu.edu
Mark Shirley LA Sea Grant mshirley@agcenter.lsu.edu
Patricia
Skinner
LSU AgCenter
and
Sea
Grant
Extension
pskinner@agcenter.lsu.edu
Bob Stewart UL Lafayette bob_stewart@louisiana.edu
John Supan LA Sea Grant College Program jsupan@lsu.edu
Glenn Thomas* Louisiana State University gthomas@lsu.edu
R. Eugene Turner Louisiana State University euturne@lsu.edu
Thomas Van Biersle LGS‐LSU tvanbier@lsu.edu
Jenneke Visser Louisiana State University comvss@lsu.edu
Michael Wascom, JD Dept. of Env. Studies, LSU coewas@lsu.edu
Ann Weaver* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center ann.weaver@noaa.gov
Chuck Wilson* LA Sea Grant cwilson@lsu.edu
Maurice Wolcott LA Sea Grant mwolcott@agctr.lsu.edu
Jun Xu LSU yjxu@lsu.edu
*Workshop facilitator or floater.
62
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 187/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 188/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 189/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Breakout Group Results
Participants in each themed breakout group identified research needs and voted for the research topics they
believed were most important. Each participant was provided eight votes and they could place up to two
votes on an individual research topic.
Prior to the voting session some breakout groups combined multiple ideas that were mentioned during the
brainstorming session, and therefore crossed out similar ideas so that they would not be available during the
voting session. The tables below include all comments written on the flip chart paper, and those topics that
were crossed out on the flip chart paper are indicated with a strike through in the ta ble.
Information needs and policy, management, and education related topics were also captured in the breakout
group sessions but were not voted on for the prioritization process. The results of these discussions are also
included under each themed heading.
65
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 190/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Research Needs
Table 1. Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” breakout
group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Measure of valuation of depletable/renewable resources
(ecosystem services) 8
Impact of reduced freshwater/sediment discharge on
northern Gulf estuaries 7
Model impact of sea‐level rise on coastal habitat/fauna/flora
and humans 7
Threshold of quantity and quality of habitat for sustainable
populations 7
Comparative analysis
of
freshwater
and
marine
influence
systems (abiotic and biotics) as they respond to natural
and anthropogenic effects 6
Examine tradeoff between cultural gains and losses vs.
economic/ecological gains 6
New dynamic modeling that addresses non‐equilibrium
ecosystems resiliency 6
Synergistic impact of multiple stressors on ecosystems
(Investigate natural + anthropogenic) 6
Interaction of habitat degradation modification upon
behavior and distribution of biota 4
Large scale ecosystem thresholds/regime change‐
replacement (ecosystem change) 4
Impact of invasive species and associated management
strategies on ecosystem services 3
66
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 191/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 192/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Research Needs
Table 2. Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Develop model of what a successful resilient community is
‐Are there three or four elements in reconstruction plan
that are essential?
‐Transportation vs. schools
‐What needs to be in place before so that it comes back
quickly (design of community)
‐Hazards
‐Hurricanes—wind and surge
‐Drought
‐Flood
‐Sea‐level rise
‐Saltwater intrusion/canals
‐Fire
‐Urban/rural interface
‐Research into rebound from natural or man‐induced
hazards
17
Economic research into whether it costs more to harden
utilities (bury power lines) than to bring crews in after
the storm
‐How to make structures survive?
‐How
much
will
it
cost
in
30
years
if
community
is
still
using existing infrastructure?
9
What are the cultural and demographic broad differences in
how people view place and resiliency?
‐How do these differences affect community resiliency?
‐Traditions?
‐How does age/gender/economic affect resiliency?
‐How much do these affect decisions to stay?
‐Why evacuate or donʹt?
9
Do formal or informal communications work better in certain
situations?
‐Church response vs. Red Cross 7
In communities which are more resilient
‐Is there a connection to education?
‐How much does community invest?
‐What subjects?
6
68
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 193/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 2 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Insurance – makes it harder to come back
‐What are the business aspects
‐Commercial vs. government products
‐What is the water dependency of those?
6
Which is the best wetland habitat remediation strategy?
‐Buffers, reduction of existing problem
‐How successful projects will be
5
Have tidal datums reflected sea‐level rise? If so, what is the
cause?
‐Subsidence? 4
What are the regional differences in response, and why? 4
What could we replace abandoned areas with to make things
work better next time? 3
How demographics or religious or value systems of community affect ability of community to respond?
2
How do community dynamics play into the response to
hazards? 2
If put more water into wetlands, will it cause more algal
blooms?
‐Can wetlands even absorb additional water?
2
What approach do we take—education, regulation,
incentives? 2
How do people learn about their homes and flood/hazard
risk?
1
How high comfort level affects response? 1
Hypoxia could affect how economically viable community is 1
Are communities at risk from earthquakes and tsunamis? 0
Are there differences in first responders? Do some things
work better?
‐E.g., Coast Guard vs. Red Cross 0
Determine develop evaluation technique for individual sites
to determine best strategy 0
Freshwater resources 0
How do
you
determine
what
is
the
best
look
(historical/natural) for the location? 0
How do you get nutrients out of river? 0
How solid is the communications system? 0
How do fisheries systems rebound? 0
If we changed government policies, would more people stay?
Should they? 0
69
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 194/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 2 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Other hazards
‐Drought
‐Hypoxia
‐Fisheries
0
Should first responders invest in connections to churches? 0
What impact will sea‐level rise have on local communities?
‐How do you communicate that? 0
What is in place that works well?
‐Combined with demographics 0
What procedures need to be in place? 0
What was the response of the bulkheads? 0
Why would Salvation Army or Red Cross have different
levels of success in different areas? 0
Information Needs
Develop model of what a successful resilient community is
Economic research into costs of hardening infrastructure versus continuing with existing and
rebuilding after
Have tidal datums in Gulf detected a rise in sea levels? If so, why?
How do demographics of a community affect how the community responds?
How does the insurance situation (commercial vs. government policies) affect resilience of
community?
Is there a link between investment in education and community resilience?
Research into
how
formal
and
informal
communication
come
into
play
and
which
works
better
and
when
Which approach—education, regulation, incentives—is more effective in increasing resiliency?
Which is the best habitat remediation technique to increase resiliency?
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Education
Insurance
o Government policies
o Enabling risk
Resiliency index
State and local incentives to developers to build better mandates
Tie tidal datums together across Gulf
70
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 195/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Research Needs
Table 3. Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Impact of next (e.g., super Panama) shallow draft vessels on
coastal land and waterborne environments and transport 6
Study impact of shallow water dredging for small marinas
on water quality, SED, transport, and circulation
Research on non‐dredging and sediment management in
ports and channels
6
Research on environmental/economic impacts of marine
aquaculture in Gulf of Mexico region 4
What are attributes of a resilient port? 4
Air/water quality advantages of marine transportation 3
Baseline study of aquatic species in major ports/waterways
‐Need to study and define boundaries between marine and
inland waters and the various environmental prediction
systems that apply to them
‐Regional impacts of land/water use on the marine
environment
‐Research needed in improved dredging and construction
(illegible) and management practices
3
Economic/cultural impacts of a working waterfront
community to regional economics 3
How much waterfront is required for necessary marine
operations (how much, what type, and where) and
impacts?
3
Assessment of unmanned vehicles (air/surface/underwater),
machine operations, and research on homeland security 2
Impact of shoreline changes on marine operations 2
Quantitative relationships of the biotic effects of sediments 2
Beneficial uses and other issues concerned with dredged
material management 1
Baseline
acoustic
survey
of
marine
mammals
in
Gulf
of
Mexico 0
Inventory economic/environmental impacts of all Gulf of
Mexico marine industries 0
71
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 196/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Information Needs
Inventory of marine establishments/services/operations in the Gulf of Mexico (GIS)
o Aquaculture/seafood/fisheries
o Transport/shipping
o Recreational
o Government operations
o Economic impact
o Water/non‐water dependent
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Need for marine information systems in inland waters (AIS)
Regional (Gulf of Mexico) strategic maritime business plan
72
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 197/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Research Needs
Table 4. Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting results from
the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
‐Changes in demographics building in coastal areas ‐ lack of
insurance, etc.
‐Affects of changing insurance rates on population
demographics ‐ upstate as well
‐Predict long‐term changes in commerce/industrial
centers/shipping changes due to SL change and
potential locations
‐Watershed development, coastal metabolism, acidification
and climate, AL and barriers to marsh migration
‐Social
economic
impacts
of
climate
change
and
sea
‐level
change
‐Population dynamics
‐Infrastructure (large vs. individual home)
‐Demographic shifts
‐Coastal resilience
‐Commerce changes
Did not
vote
‐Possible change in species distribution with climate change
in currents/temp change/freshwater influx
‐Effects on fisheries stocks/populations/habitats
‐Measures of actual sea‐level change air and water temps in
local
areas
over
time
and
applications
to
better
predict
‐Investigate pedagogical techniques to better educate public
and principal officials to be concerned with long‐term
changes as opposed to anomalous events about climate
change and coastal ocean ecosystems
‐Rates of elevation changes in marshes & reasons for change
(subsidence, plate tectonics)
‐Basic background ‐ is climate change human induced?
‐Measure changes in ocean surface temps
Did not
vote
73
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 198/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 199/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Information Needs
Habitat maps for the region‐terrestrial/aquatic/marine
Hydrodynamic models ‐ sub‐regional levels
Local subsidence rates across region
Enhance information networks
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Education/outreach on sea level change
Incorporate science/models into local building codes
Communicate science as changes to changing municipal officials
Incorporate Implement smart growth policies
75
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 200/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Research Needs
Table 5. Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Determining impacts of near coastal development 8
Eutrophication/nutrients/hypoxia 8
Habitat loss and effects on major fish species (coastal marsh
loss), changes in amount/quality of habitat—impacts
on fish, etc. 7
Better ecosystem‐scale models (habitat‐species connections
(e.g., seabirds and sea turtle nesting habitats) 6
Develop appropriate indicators of ecosystem health for
coastal/marine systems
‐Indicator species need to be ones that can be studied in
large numbers (rare/endangered not good candidates)
6
Human manipulation including changing timing of
freshwater inflows—impacts (e.g., oysters) 6
Marine debris 6
Research what variables need to be monitored and mapped
to support ecosystem/scale work 6
Invasive species—pathways, prevention, and control
‐Invasive jellyfish in Gulf
‐Lionfish may be headed here
‐Understanding changes in plant communities and how
Impacts ecosystem functions/services
‐Changing community structure of benthos too
‐Changes in particle size/inorganics
5
Impacts of commercial trawling and recreational fisheries on
‐The fisheries
‐The larger ecosystem (e.g., bottom)
4
Research on restoration techniques
‐What works for stability of projects?
‐What leads to greatest function?
‐Effective for mitigation
4
Harmful algal blooms—subsurface
‐Formation and inshore/offshore transport
‐Human health concerns
‐Shellfish
‐Sea grass
‐Marine mammal die‐offʹs
3
76
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 201/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Human perceptions
‐Nutrients 3
Boating (commercial and recreational) increasing wave
energy/wakes, causing erosion/need for armoring
(understudied)
Impacts of boat traffic (e.g., on marine mammals, birds, sea
grass)
2
Economic valuation of habitats (e.g., marsh) and economic
impacts of habitat losses 2
Effects of armored shorelines vs. natural 2
Offshore mariculture—how impacts ecosystem 2
Research into why existing laws to protect marine/coastal
resources aren’t being effective (e.g., loopholes, lack of
enforcement)
2
Organismic health and disease (e.g., coral or sea urchin die‐
off’s—learn a lot from these processes) 1
Remote sensing research (understanding the signal) 1
Study bottlenose dolphins in Gulf bays, sounds, and
estuaries (unique groups with unique behaviors/cultures) 1
Connections between nearshore and offshore areas, and
between watersheds (need for interdisciplinary research) 0
Eutrophication/nutrient inputs—how effects ecosystem
health 0
How are
human
pathogens
in
seafood
modified
by
ecosystem conditions, habitat/species interactions, etc. 0
Research origin of marine debris 0
Role of seabirds and sea turtles in the ecosystem (e.g., habitat
needs, impacts on other species) 0
Coastal hypoxia—effects on biogeochemistry of estuaries 0
Effects of marine debris on ecosystems (habitats and species) 0
Essential fish habitat, connections to water quality 0
Freshwater inflow and timing 0
Human perceptions and understanding of ecosystem health
and change
‐Research into how to effectively change behavior
‐How to interest folks who don’t live on the coast
0
Human perceptions of and understanding of nutrient input
(why need to follow fertilizer instructions) 0
Research why messages about/enforcement of marine debris
laws haven’t been effective 0
77
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 202/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Information Needs
Begin with inventory of existing research (before can truly know what research priorities are)
Monitoring of coastal hypoxia—need regional assessment to understand magnitude of problem
Regional coordination of sea grass mapping/EFH mapping
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Cash reward for recycling (instead of throwing overboard)
Hard to enforce marine litter/debris laws
Include Cuba and Mexico in Gulf of Mexico ecosystem work
Marine mammals a good way to involve and interest the public
More conservation of natural systems vs. mitigation restoration
Need education about ecosystem health and change and the role of people
Teacher workshops for inland teachers to share coastal/marine info
Trash
in
Gulf
of
Mexico
indicates
connection
with
inland
78
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 203/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Research Needs
Table 6. Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Vibrio – in seafood
‐Understand transport sources, process of contamination
‐Understand natural history, role, how humans facilitate
roles to risk
‐Is it emerging threat?
‐How do humans facilitate risk?
5
New products?
‐Drugs
‐Bio‐sensors/source tracking
‐Micro‐arrays
‐Bio‐remediation
‐Bio‐materials
‐Sustainable as products
‐Various molecular probes
‐Bio
4
What are the best/new methods to process public seafood to
decontaminate for consumption? 4
How to educate citizens as to good stewardship related to
water quality and potential human health risks? 3
Industrial discharge impacts on human health and
proliferation of harmful organisms 3
Understand biodiversity of the Gulf of Mexico to identify
new products 2
What are economic impacts to human health from pathogen
contamination? 2
What environmental conditions mediate biochemistry?
Production of natural products? 2
What is natural history of potentially harmful organisms
environmental attributes, risks, and impacts (Harmful
Algal Blooms (HAB’s), virus, bacteria)?
‐Modeling
‐Bloom dynamics
2
How do large‐scale climate change and hurricanes affect:
‐Genetics?
‐Epidemiology? 1
How do oil spills impact health of environment and humans? 1
79
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 204/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 6 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Bird migration path and risk from avian flu, what diseases
are transported by migratory birds and how climate
change and human development impacts routes 0
Develop micro array for detection of beneficial and harmful
organisms 0
Drugs from sea, biosensors 0
Effluent release practices affect pathogen concentration and
spatial distribution 0
Epidemiological studies on impacts of bloom, virus
pathogens, quantify risk 0
Gain a better understanding of genetic controls and
gene expression 0
How do different levels of wastewater treatment affect
pathogen concentrations? 0
How do large‐scale events, such as climate change and
hurricanes affect human exposure to pathogens?
‐Pathogen concentrations/prevalence
‐Bloom dynamics
‐Bird migration (avian flu)
‐Tropical disease
0
How to educate/awareness of risks of eating contaminated
seafood
‐Public and health care providers 0
Increase seafood
consumption
education
0
Model harmful algal blooms and Vibrio ‐ creation of bloom
dynamics 0
Quantify/investigate risk of tropical disease migrating due to
climate change 0
Understand environmental factors that cause harmful algal
blooms and Vibrio virulence 0
What are new sources of bio‐remediation bacteria material? 0
What are best/alternate indicators for virus pathogens and
how can pathogens be linked to sources? 0
What are
human
health
impacts
from
hurricanes
‐large
‐scale
events? 0
What are the roles of different sources? 0
80
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 205/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Information Needs
Deep sea harvesting technology
Generate baseline for many microorganisms
Identify contaminant sources associated with large‐scale events
Need observing systems ‐ presence, abundance, location & environmental conditions, and
baseline oceanographic info
Vibrio baseline data
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Encourage application of source tracking technology in Gulf of Mexico
Encourage multi‐disciplinary research & approaches
Need a better‐informed public related to pathogens
81
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 206/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Overall Results—Research Priorities Determined in Large Group Voting Session
The research topics presented in Table 7 were derived from the highest rated topics from each of the themed
breakout groups. The column titled, “Theme,” in Table 7 corresponds to the breakout group from which the
research topic originated. The following codes were used: stewardship of natural and cultural ocean
resources (Stewardship), increasing resilience to natural hazards (Resilience), improving ecosystem health
(Ecosystem), enabling marine operations (Operations), enhancing human health (Human), and the ocean’s role in climate (Climate).
Each participant had 12 votes for the large group voting session and could place up to two votes for any one
research topic.
Note that in some cases research topics presented by different breakout groups were very similar. An in‐
depth analysis of similar topics identified within and between workshops will be discussed in a later report.
Table 7. Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme areas.
Research Topic
Votes
Theme
Socioeconomic impacts of climate change and sea level change on:
‐Population dynamics
‐Infrastructure (large scale versus individual homes)
‐Demographic shifts
‐Coastal resilience
‐Commerce/shipping centers and needs‐changes
32 Climate
Changes in habitat quantity and quality‐‐impacts on fish species,
etc. (all marine organisms) 28 Ecosystem
Understand processes, effects, and trade‐offs of climate change on
coastal and upland areas over time, including
‐Barrier islands ‐Elevations
‐Sea level change
‐Barriers to marsh migration
‐Rates of elevation change
‐Hydrology
28 Climate
Develop model of what a successful resilient community is 27 Resilience
Eutrophication/Nutrients
‐Impacts on ecosystem health
‐Coastal hypoxia and its impacts 22 Ecosystem
Research into shallow‐water dredging and non‐dredging sediment
management and impacts on water quality, sediment transport,
and circulation
21 Operations
Economic/cultural/intrinsic impacts of working waterfront
communities (value‐added perspective) 20 Operations
82
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 207/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Human manipulation of freshwater inflows (amount and timing)
impacts on resources (e.g. oysters) 19 Ecosystem
Measure of valuation of depleted/renewable resources
(ecosystem services) 19
Stewardship
Research on environmental/economic impacts of marine
aquaculture in Gulf of Mexico 19 Operations
Better ecosystem‐scale models showing habitat‐species connections
(e.g. sea birds’ and sea turtles’ nesting habitat) 17 Ecosystem
Examine tradeoff between cultural gains and losses versus
economic/ecological gains and losses 17 Stewardship
Impacts of next‐generation, shallow‐draft PANAMAX (post) super‐
containers on land/water transport and environments
(inland too)
17 Operations
Impact of
reduced
freshwater/sediment
discharge
on
northern
Gulf
estuaries 16 Stewardship
What new products can be discovered/developed to serve as:
drugs, bio‐sensors/source tracking, micro‐arrays, bio
remediation, bio‐materials, molecular probes?
16 Human
How do large scale events, such as climate change and hurricanes
affect exposure to pathogens, pathogen concentrations
(prevalence, bloom dynamics, bird migration (avian flu), and
tropical disease?
14 Human
What are the affects of industrial discharge on human health and
proliferation of harmful organisms? 14 Human
Economic research
into
cost
of
hardening
infrastructure
versus
maintaining existing and rebuilding after 12 Resilience
Study thresholds of quantity and quality of habitats for sustainable
populations 12 Stewardship
Baseline study of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in major
ports/waterways 11 Operations
Marine Debris
‐Research on origins
‐Research on why education and enforcement of laws haven’t
been effective
‐Effects on ecosystems (habitats, species)
11 Ecosystem
New dynamic models that address non‐equilibrium systems
(models that don’t assume some “natural”/steady state) 11 Stewardship
83
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 208/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Changes in species distribution with climate change, changes in
currents, temperature change, and freshwater influx, and their
effects on fisheries stocks, populations, and habitats
10 Climate
How do demographics of community affect how the community
responds? 10 Resilience
Potentially harmful organisms‐What is natural history,
environmental attributes, risks, impacts, bloom dynamics,
genetics, epidemiology, modeling
10 Human
Develop appropriate indicators of ecosystem health for
coastal/marine systems 9 Ecosystem
Research which variables need to be monitored and mapped to
support ecosystem‐scale work 8 Ecosystem
Study synergistic impact of multiple stressors on ecosystems 8 Stewardship
Determining impacts of near coastal development 7 Ecosystem
Invasive species (e.g. jellyfish in Gulf, lionfish may enter Gulf)
‐Research pathways, prevention and control techniques
‐Research changes in communities (plant communities, benthos)
and how these changes impact the ecosystem
7 Ecosystem
What attributes comprise a resilient port? Green port? 7 Operations
Comparative analysis of freshwater and marine influenced systems
(abiotic and biotic) as they respond to natural and
anthropogenic effects 6 Stewardship
Investigate techniques to better educate the public and municipal
officials about climate change and coastal ocean ecosystems 6 Climate
Which approach—education, regulation, incentives—is more
effective in increasing resiliency? 6 Resilience
What are anthropogenic forcing on pathogen concentrations,
bloom dynamics and factors that affect them? 5 Human
How does the insurance make‐up of community (self‐insured,
commercial, fed.) affect resiliency? 4 Resilience
How much/where/what type of ‘water front’ is necessary/required
for marine operations? (10, 25, 50, 100 years) 4 Operations
Impacts of marine energy development (air, nuclear) on marine
environment 4 Operations
Measures of actual sea level change and changes in air and water surface temperatures in local areas over time. Determine
applications to better predict these factors 4 Climate
Model impacts of sea‐level rise on coastal habitat, flora/fauna,
and humans 4 Stewardship
84
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 209/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Conduct research into formal and informal communications
network to determine which works better and in what
situations
3 Resilience
Is there a link between education and resiliency? 3 Resilience
What are best/new methods to ensure seafood safety? 3 Human
Air/water quality advantage of marine transportation (e.g. short‐
sea shipping, or container on‐ barge) 2 Operations
How do we educate stakeholders regarding health risks from
contaminated seafood and water quality; good stewardship? 2 Human
Watershed development, coastal metabolism/acidification,
and climate 2 Climate
Have tidal datums in Gulf detected rise in sea level? If so, what is
the reason? 1 Resilience
What is
the
biodiversity
and
environmental
conditions
of
the
Gulf
that relate to production of natural products? 1 Human
What are the economic impacts to human health from pathogen
contamination? 0 Human
What is the best habitat remediation strategy to increase resiliency? 0 Resilience
85
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 210/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Acknowledgements
This workshop would not have been possible without the support of numerous individuals. Thank you to all
of the following:
Host:
Mississippi State University Coastal Research and Extension Center (Mary Dikes and Dave Burrage)
Sponsors and workshop support:
NOAA National Sea Grant College Program
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (LaDon Swann, Kay Bruening, John Grigsby, Melissa Schneider,
and Loretta Leist)
Facilitation support:
Gulf Coast Services Center (Heidi Recksiek and Tina Sanchez)
Mississippi‐Alabama
Sea
Grant
Consortium
(Lou
D’Abramo,
Stephanie
Showalter,
and
Jody
Thompson)
Northern Gulf Institute (Michael Carron)
Workshop participants:
See appendix C.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Principal Investigators:
LaDon Swann, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Charles Wilson, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Bob Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program
Karl Havens, Florida Sea Grant College Program
86
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 211/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Appendix A:
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Workshop Agenda
Mississippi State University Coastal Research and Extension Center
Biloxi, Mississippi
January 17,
2008
10:00 a.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Workshop Agenda
10:00‐10:15 Check‐in, coffee
10:15‐10:50 Welcome and Purpose of the GMRP workshop (all participants)
10:50‐11:00 Small Group Session Goals and Objectives (all participants)
11:00‐Noon Identify Research Topics within Themes (breakout group)
Noon‐12:15 Break and Pick‐up Lunches
12:15‐1:30 Refine and Prioritize Research Topics—working lunch (breakout group)
1:30‐2:00 Groups Present Top Research Topics for each Theme (all participants)
2:00‐2:30 Voting Session of all Research Topics (all participants)
2:30‐2:45 Wrap up (all participants)
87
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 212/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Appendix B:
Process diagram to identify and prioritize research topics at the GMRP workshop
88
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 213/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 214/291
GMRP Appendix F
Mississippi Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Keith Mullin NOAA NMFS Keith.D.Mullin@noaa.gov
Dave Nieland Louisiana Sea Grant dniela@lsu.edu
Corky Perret Mississippi Dept. of Marine Resources corky.perret@dmr.ms.gov
Craig Peterson NASA SSC Craig.A.Peterson@NASA.GOV
Daniel Petrolia Mississippi State University petrolia@agecon.msstate.edu
Ben Posadas MSU‐CREC benp@ext.msstate.edu
Drew Puffer EPA/Gulf of Mexico Program puffer.drew@epa.gov
Heidi Recksiek* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center Heidi.Recksiek@noaa.gov
Jay Ritchie Northern Gulf Institute jritchie@ngi.msstate.edu
Joseph Runnels MS DMR joseph.runnels@dmr.ms.gov
David Ruple Grand bay National Estuarine Research Reserve david.ruple@dmr.ms.gov
Tina
Sanchez*
NOAA
Gulf
Coast
Services
Center
Tina.Sanchez@noaa.gov
Steve Sempier* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium Stephen.sempier@usm.edu
Stephanie Showalter* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Legal Program sshowalt@olemiss.edu
Tina Shumate MS DMR tina.shumate@dmr.ms.gov
Marc Slattery University of Mississippi/NIUST OBCR slattery@olemiss.edu
LaDon Swann* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium swanndl@auburn.edu
Jody Thompson* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Extension
Program thomp13@auburn.edu
Mark Woodrey Mississippi State University msw103@ra.msstate.edu
Jennifer Wozencraft Joint Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Technical
Center of Expertise
Jennifer.M.Wozencraft@usace.a
rmy.mil
Lee
Yokel
GOMA‐
DISL
Lyokel@disl.org
*Workshop facilitator or floater.
90
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 215/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning
Workshop Report
For the workshop held in
Spanish Fort, Alabama on
January 15, 2008
Workshops were partially funded through a grant provided by the
National Sea Grant College Program to:
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Florida Sea Grant College Program
Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Texas Sea Grant College Program
91
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 216/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Background
The purpose of the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan (GMRP) is to identify regional research and information
needs and develop a strategy to address these needs through collaboration with agencies and organizations
that conduct and use Gulf of Mexico‐related research. The project is sponsored by the National Sea Grant
College Program and Gulf of Mexico Sea Grant College Programs. The GMRP is rooted in stakeholder input,
and workshops were one of the primary methods used to collect this input. Workshops were held in each
Gulf of Mexico state and supported by numerous individuals (see acknowledgements section). This report
provides the results from the workshop at the 5 Rivers Delta Resource Center in Spanish Fort, Alabama.
The workshop agenda (appendix A) was designed to identify high‐priority research topics related to the six
societal themes described in the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology’s 2007 document
“Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States for the Next Decade—An Ocean Research
Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy.” The themes included:
stewardship of natural and cultural ocean resources,
increasing resilience to natural hazards,
enabling marine operations,
the ocean’s
role
in
climate,
improving ecosystem health, and
enhancing human health.
A process (appendix B) was developed to allow workshop participants (appendix C) to efficiently develop a
list of research priorities in a limited amount of time. Participants were divided into breakout groups by
theme area to discuss specific research topics, information needs, and other topics that related to their theme
area. Individuals in the breakout group then voted for the research topics discussed in their session that they
believed were most important. The eight to ten topics with the highest votes were then presented to all
workshop participants. All workshop participants then voted for these top research topics across all theme
areas.
This report presents 1) the results of the breakout group voting for each theme area, 2) the non‐research
topics discussed in each breakout group, and 3) the results of the large group voting session across all theme
areas.
If you will be using the information provided in this report for planning or other purposes we would like to
hear from you. For more information about the Gulf of Mexico Research Planning effort or to share how you
will be using the results of the GMRP workshop(s) please contact Steve Sempier, Gulf of Mexico Research
Planning Coordinator, at stephen.sempier@usm.edu.
You can also learn more about the GMRP at the project’s web site at: masgc.org/gmrp.
92
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 217/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Breakout Group Results
Participants in each themed breakout group identified research needs and voted for the research topics they
believed were most important. Each participant was provided eight votes and they could place up to two
votes on an individual research topic.
Prior to the voting session some breakout groups combined multiple ideas that were mentioned during the
brainstorming session, and therefore crossed out similar ideas so that they would not be available during the
voting session. The tables below include all comments written on the flip chart paper, and those topics that
were crossed out on the flip chart paper are indicated with a strike through in the ta ble.
Information needs and policy, management, and education related topics were also captured in the breakout
group sessions but were not voted on for the prioritization process. The results of these discussions are also
included under each themed heading.
93
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 218/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Research Needs
Table 1. Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” breakout
group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Understanding of interspecies relationships
‐Accurate assessment of biodiversity (ADCNE is doing?) 8
Economic evaluation of (hunting and fishing) outdoor
activities
‐(Gulf of Mexico/Coastal) Comprehensive economic
analysis of maritime related activities
6
Research of delivery methods and messages to get people
to change behavior related to stewardship ‐ evaluation of
existing programs
6
Assessment of which biological/environmental factors
impact status and trends
‐Pristine environment
‐Fisheries
‐Water quality
‐Tourism
‐Land use/development impacts
5
How do current cultural practices impact the
environment?
‐Identification of cultural practices that exist now that are
sustainable
5
Identification of changing land use patterns and creating
models to predict areas most heavily impacted 4
Status and trends of biological species 4
Analysis of changing patterns of resource use (fishing,
hunting, commercial) 2
Valuation of natural resources (biological, social,
economic, ecosystem) 2
Identification of tourist expectations, knowledge of
environment (human dimension surveys) 1
Analysis of human use patterns related to the resources
and development 0
Confirmative evaluation of outreach activities/programs
‐Effectiveness
‐Research of how to conduct effective outreach/
education programsʺ
0
94
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 219/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 220/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Research Needs
Table 2. Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Identify offshore sand resources for use in beach
nourishment/delineation 7
Ecosystem, living and habitat, beaches rate/ability to recover
from natural and man‐made hazards (comprehensive
profile and vegetative)
6
Rates of shoreline change due to human impact (combined
with ʺDo long‐term shoreline change rates vary between
natural and engineered beachesʺ for large group ranking
session)
6
Explore geology/topography of shoreline vulnerability/
potential to breach 5
Update surge modeling and products 5
Assess economic and social vulnerability of coastal
community 4
Improve capability and coordinate evacuation procedures for
emergencies 4
Quantify impacts of winter storm events on coastal regions 4
Develop understanding of wetland process and change along
Mississippi Sound 2
Catalog resilience best practices, evaluate what factors make
a city/town resilient 1
Determine best method (including natural alternatives) of
shoreline stabilization 1
Hurricane probability, frequency, and growth modeling,
looking at future development 1
Collect shallow water bathy data and lidar to assess
dunes/beaches 0
Detect long‐term shoreline/beach morphodynamics 0
Develop sand prioritization 0
Do long‐term shoreline change rates vary between natural
and engineered beaches 0
Investigate historical topography bathy vulnerability to
shoreline breach 0
Societal perception of hurricane impacts – people
understanding Saffir‐Simpson scale, surge predictions,
and perception of uniform damage
0
What are subsidence rates 0
96
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 221/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Information Needs
See Steve Junes for bathy data
Accurate near‐shore wave data
Expand bi‐annual shoreline data orthophotography collection to include Mississippi Sound and
wetlands shoreline
High accuracy reference network
Centralized shoreline/topography data location to facilitate research
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Improve land use planning, floodplain management, development of high risk areas
Have sand resources pre‐identified
Investigate access to Florida sand
Educating
citizens
on
reducing
vulnerability/understanding
of
barrier
island
Evaluate evacuation policies and emergency operating plans
Educate media on responsible storm/hazard reporting
97
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 222/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Research Needs
Table 3. Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Define establish value of working waterfront businesses
competing waterfront development on a
regional/national scale (e.g., three boat repair facilities
nationally for Coast Guard) to assist waterfront
development decision‐making
9
Economic, social, environmental/cost‐ benefit analysis of
working waterfront versus residential/tourism other
types of development ‐ how much waterfront needed
to sustain?
6
Understand systems involved and develop better
management practices in maintaining navigation
channels
6
Develop data to assist waterfront business decisions
(locations, business expansion, etc.) 5
Open ocean aquaculture impacts 5
Water quality impacts on Gulf of Mexico systems,
including estuaries 5
Economic and environmental impacts of short‐water
commodity trips vs. land‐ based transport (i.e., from
state docks
to
Hyundai
plant)
4
Evaluate economic impact of dredging on
ʺnontraditional̋ (smaller) channel and of innovative
methods of dredging
4
Impact of human development on water quality ‐
understanding water quality change based on land
use/land cover ‐ utilize observation systems to
determine preventative strategies
4
Impacts and better prediction of global warming/sea‐level
rise change on commerce and inland businesses and
coastal communities
4
Impacts
of
super
Panamex
vessels
on
ports,
transportation, and environmental quality 4
Develop detection methods for new non‐native species 3
Predictions on hurricanes, strength, location of strike,
storm surge ‐ accuracy and lead time 3
White paper definitions of ʺworking waterfrontsʺ across
US 3
Understanding of capacity of Gulf to meet commercial
and recreational fishing needs 2
98
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 223/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 3 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Understanding of Gulf based on impacts of new
technologies related to fishing, homeland security, and
energy production (waves, nuclear)
2
Evaluate comparative impacts of shipbuilding and port
operations on water quality, especially stormwater 1
Research the translation of research data/technology to
applied uses (business/commerce community) 1
Air quality/air impact space impacts of maritime
operations 0
Analyze definition of safe harbor info, how many exist,
and how many are needed 0
Identify characteristics to determine where production
centers (fishing, boat‐ building) should exist/expand 0
Identify emerging technologies for future
commerce/impacts 0
Impact of ocean/sea breezes on ozone levels over land 0
Incoming vessels and their impacts of on aquatic nuisance
non‐invasive species 0
Long term coastal change detection 0
Meteorological impact of ocean on near‐shore lands 0
Qualify study culturally diverse groups in Gulf of Mexico
area 0
Research techniques to decrease response time to
hazards/spills 0
Better prediction
of
sea
level
change
and
impacts
on
coastal communities 0
Economic studies (ecotourism) 0
Environmental impacts of competing waterfront land uses 0
How to mitigate impacts of sand movement on shipping
channels ‐ better management 0
Impacts/benefits of energy production methods 0
Social impacts of competing waterfront land uses 0
Study less‐impact industry 0
99
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 224/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Information Needs
Modeling shipping channels
Better tonnage reporting mechanism
Map available safe harbors Low cost, real‐time observation systems
Predictive models of hurricane strike & surge
Model (not pure economic) to assist business decisions
Identify safe harbors, how many exist, and how many are needed
White paper definitions of ʺworking waterfrontsʺ across US
Long term coastal change detection
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Regional dredging plan
Utilize
information
in
policy
making
Translate research into actions
100
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 225/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Research Needs
Table 4. Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting results from
the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
How climate variability affects pollution sediment and
nutrient/organic composites delivery 8
Impacts of climate change/precipitation/salt wedge
hydrology on ocean/estuarine circulation 6
Historical reconstruction of ecosystem indicators 5
Impact of sea‐level rise on native coastal habitat 5
Impact of temperature/salinity on expanding species
range/invasive species/productivity (fisheries, etc.) 5
Research into generation of climate change scenarios 5
Has built environment effected rainfall and water
penetration/seawater penetration
into
aquifer
4
Impact of sea temperature/salinity on harmful algal blooms,
toxins, and pathogens 4
Impact of sea‐level rise on coastal development
(built environment) 3
Sea‐level rise and nutrient release from eroding marshes 3
Socio‐economic impact of climate change on coastal
communities (insurance, codes, etc.) 3
Impact of built environment on atmospheric circulation
(mesoclimate) 2
Positive impact of oceans on mitigating man‐made climate
changing factors
2
Predicted shifts in storm intensity/frequency and effects 2
How has/does development of coastal lands and associated
waterways (?) impact relative sea‐level rise, etc. 1
Impact of algal productivity or geochemistry on climate 1
Incorporate climate change into existing or new
hydrological models 1
Human perceptions of “status” of coastal environment,
land/sea interface, and change 0
Information Needs
Historical baselines for comparison to climate change
o Identify, enhance, and support
o Current baseline data
o Gathering for comparisons
Accurate topography
Accurate subsidence
Policy, Management or Education Topics
(none provided)
101
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 226/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Research Needs
Table 5. Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Hydrological issues (bullets from detailed items) 8
Identify appropriate variables needed to develop good
indicators of ecosystem health (variables for indices)
‐Canʹt measure everything, so what pick?
‐E.g., salinity? Indicator species?
7
Research most effective methods for encouraging public
participation in protecting fisheries and other natural
resources [water quality (ground and surface), habitat,
fisheries, oil, also natural resources and recreation
areas] (e.g. of methods = education, workshops, volunteer opportunities, public outreach, political
lobbying, scholarships); also research types of
info/methods for communicating with decision‐
makers/officials
7
Nutrient loading/non‐point source 6
Better understand of success of different restoration
techniques (comparative analysis) (e.g., planting sea
oats)
‐How many variables play into success (which type
plants, type sediment, type slope)
‐Research
technologies
to
improve
function
5
Fisheries natural science (non‐economic) 5
Research into connectivity between different habitats
(e.g., upstream/downstream, wildlife corridors,
impacts of barriers, lateral connection between streams
and adjacent woodland habitat)
5
Influence of invasive species on ecosystem health 4
Stormwater management (GIS and methods) 4
Compare effectiveness of different types of artificial reef
material being deployed in the Gulf of Mexico (barges,
chicken transfer cages, concrete mixing drums,
concrete
pyramids,
bridge
rubble)
3
Impact of human development on coastal systems,
specifically habitat change 3
Research on methods of changing human behavior; re.,
environment 3
Better predictive models to show impacts of continued
population growth on coastal ecosystems (where is the
tipping point for different
resources/systems/functions)
2
102
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 227/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research alternative institutional frameworks and
management actions (e.g., incentives/disincentives) for
influencing human behaviors that affect the
environment 2
Research mechanisms that aid in organizing, recording,
and analyzing measurements/field results – how
connect measurements from different states
2
Alternative to shoreline armoring
‐Research efficacy, economics, habitat impacts, sediment
‐Types: Bulk heading, breakwaters, living shorelines
alternatives
‐Use of living shoreline alternatives to armoring
(marsh, oyster)
1
Effects of
human
behavior
on
the
coastal
environment
(ecological impacts) 1
Identify metrics that can be used on a regional basis 1
Alternative costs of stormwater management—what are
right methods for doing county‐wide stormwater
management
0
Better understanding of mercury loading and
bioaccumulation 0
Determining the non‐use value of ecosystems (e.g.,
aesthetics) (wilderness value) 0
Develop models to predict impacts of nutrient non‐point
source pollution
on
coastal
resources
0
Economic impacts resulting from changes in fish/shellfish
populations 0
Economic value of coastal habitat/delta, e.g., ecotour
value 0
Economic value of restored habitats 0
Ecosystem function of restored habitats, and research on
techniques to improve function 0
Effect of stormwater management on the coastal
environment 0
Efficacy of/cost‐ benefit of different types of marine
protected
areas
0
How does filling one wetland impact adjacent
ecosystems? 0
103
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 228/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Impact of altered sediment circulation
‐Impacts of causeways/other structures on sediment
transport
‐How does restoration/engineering impact sediment circulation
‐How does that impact oysters
0
Impacts of sea‐level rise on ecosystem health 0
Implications of sea‐level rise for restoration decisions 0
Lack of understanding of relationship between estuary
and bay 0
Cumulative impacts of human activities on fisheries
‐Investigating whether top‐down of bottom‐up has
greater impacts on fish populations
0
Develop predictive models of fish populations that
incorporate physical environment 0
Identify key ʺunderpinningʺ issues that are priorities for
communicating to public officials — e.g., survey
scientists to identify top issues
0
Impacts of drought on biota
‐Impacts reduced freshwater to estuaries 0
Reduced inflows due to upstream impoundments
(impacts)
‐Changes in amount and timing of flows
‐Changes in type of flow (surface vs. groundwater)
0
Role of causeways to ecological, hydrological 0
Saltwater intrusion
effects
on
biota
and
resulting
shift
in
ecosystem 0
Understanding impacts nutrient loading on:
‐harmful algal blooms
‐loss of seagrass communities
0
What GIS information/layers do you need for stormwater
management ‐ is there an optimal way? Evaluate/study
different methods so can choose cost‐effective one
0
Information Needs
Key
underpinning
issues
that
need
to
communicate
to
decision‐
makers
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Awareness of how human waste management impacts the environment
Government awareness/acknowledgement of importance of freshwater inflow (need for
freshwater inflow to coastal area) —issue even when isnʹt a drought
104
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 229/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Research Needs
Table 6. Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Nutrient criteria development; identify threshold levels
impact health 8
Rapid, field‐deployable standardized
tests/technology/hardware for detection of
contaminants/toxins and organisms
7
Cultivating/extract beneficial drug treatments from ocean
resources 5
Develop epidemiological tests screen pointing to trigger
public health response syndrome surveillance 5
Atmospheric deposits of contaminants like pathogens ‐Ballast water; people; recreational equipment
4
Contaminant (mercury, metals, organics/pathogens)
sources fate transport 4
Habitat alteration/nutrient transport and harmful algal
bloom impacts/occurrence at Gulf/estuary interface 4
Human‐made structures, contributions, and alterations 4
Identify sentinel species below human toxicity levels for
harmful agents 4
Impacts of iron fertilization of microalgae 4
Predictive modeling on of near‐shore waters on
movement of
harmful
algal
blooms/pathogens
4
Surface water temperatures/salinity/pH on pathogenicity 4
Indicators for post‐harvest effects on seafood safety 2
Long‐term exposure studies on ion‐level biotoxins (below
management levels) 2
Growth conditions for maximum toxicity 0
Socioeconomic and cultural influences on risk
communication 0
Agricultural/human runoff impacts on human health 0
Develop field deployable tests for under‐processing of
cooked/prepared local/imported ocean products 0
Habitat alteration/nutrient
transport
at
human
‐made
structures: Canals, dead‐end canals, and reefs 0
105
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 230/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 6 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Identify other contaminants natural/anthropological (non‐
mercury)
‐Identify likely sources
0
Identify potentially toxic microalgae and toxicity tests: Field deployable
0
Identify rapid tests for contaminants/toxins 0
Mercury introduction/impacts
‐Pathogen microorganism mediated mercury processing 0
Mercury sources and transport 0
Stormwater management and alteration of fresh‐water
entry amount/frequency change on harmful algal
blooms/pathology/contaminants
0
Toxins/chemical/pathogen impacts inputs from
active/inactive oil/gas rigs 0
Information Needs
(none provided)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Design educational materials programs for cross‐cultural groups
Developing education for post‐marketing processors/shipper/retailers
Incorporation of newly developed field deployable testing into management
Standards and protocols for data management
Identify
manuals
on
toxic
microalgae
and
digital
library
106
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 231/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Overall Results—Research Priorities Determined in Large Group Voting Session
The research topics presented in Table 7 were derived from the highest rated topics from each of the themed
breakout groups. The column titled, “Theme,” in Table 7 corresponds to the breakout group from which the
research topic originated. The following codes were used: stewardship of natural and cultural ocean
resources (Stewardship), increasing resilience to natural hazards (Resilience), improving ecosystem health
(Ecosystem), enabling marine operations (Operations), enhancing human health (Human), and the ocean’s role in climate (Climate).
Each participant had 12 votes for the large group voting session and could place up to two votes for any one
research topic.
Note that in some cases research topics presented by different breakout groups were very similar. An in‐
depth analysis of similar topics identified within and between workshops will be discussed in a later report.
Table 7. Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme areas.
Research Topic
Votes
Theme
Nutrient Loading/Non‐Point Source Research
‐Effects of storm water & waste water management on
environment
‐Developing models to predict impacts non‐point source
pollution on coastal resources
‐Understand nutrient loading impacts on harmful algal
blooms and on sea grass
23 Ecosystem
Identify appropriate variables needed to develop good
indicators of ecosystem health (variables for indices) 22 Ecosystem
Impact of human development on water quality,
understanding water quality change based on land‐
use/land cover – utilize observation systems to determine
preventative strategies
22 Operations
Predictive modeling of near‐shore waters for transport of
harmful algal blooms/pathogens 22 Human
Assessment of which biological and environmental factors
impact status and trends of resources
‐Fisheries, water quality, tourism, development/land use
impacts
21 Stewardship
Develop rapid field‐ based standardized tests for detection of
contaminants, toxin, and organisms 19 Human
107
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 232/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Hydrological Issues
‐Reduced inflows due to upstream impoundments
‐Drought impacts
‐Impacts & changes in timing, amount, and type of water (ground water vs. surface)
‐Salt‐water intrusion effects on biota & resulting shifts in
ecosystems
‐Role of causeways in changing hydrology
18 Ecosystem
Accurate assessment of biodiversity
‐Population, genetics, molecular ecology 17 Stewardship
Rates of shoreline change from human and natural impacts 16 Resilience
Impacts of temperature/salinity on expanding species
range/invasive species/productivity (fisheries) 15 Climate
Update storm surge modeling and products 15 Resilience
Impact of sea‐level rise on native coastal habitat 14 Climate Ecosystem resiliency to natural and man‐made hazards 13 Resilience
Research of delivery methods and messages that promote
stewardship behavior change
‐Evaluation of existing programs
13 Stewardship
Cultivating/extracting beneficial drugs/treatments from ocean
resources 11 Human
Historical reconstruction of ecosystem health indicators 11 Climate
Impact of sea temperature/salinity on harmful algal blooms,
toxins, and pathogens 11 Climate
Research connectivity between different habitats (e.g.
upstream and
downstream;
wildlife
corridors;
impacts
of
barriers, streams, and adjacent habitat) 11
Ecosystem
Economic, social, and environmental/cost benefit analysis of
working waterfronts vs. other types of development (how
much waterfront needed to sustain business)
10 Operations
Fisheries Research
‐Cumulative impacts of human activities on fisheries
‐Develop predictive models of fish populations that
incorporate physical environment information (i.e., not just
information on fishing effort, population data and harvest)
10 Ecosystem
Research into (generation of) climate change scenarios 10 Climate
Research most
effective
methods
for
encouraging
public
participation in protecting fisheries and other natural
resources – informing decision‐makers/officials (e.g.,
education, outreach workshops, volunteer opportunities,
scholarships, lobbying)
10 Ecosystem
Impacts of climate change on precipitation and
ocean/estuarine circulation 9 Climate
108
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 233/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Quantify impacts of winter storm events on coastal regions 9 Resilience
Understand capacity of Gulf to meet commercial (including
open ocean aquaculture) and recreational fishing needs and
requirements
9 Operations
Establish value of competing waterfront development on a
regional/national scale to assist waterfront development
decision‐making
8 Operations
Identify characteristics and develop data to assist waterfront
business decisions, including determination of production
centers and needs to expand
8 Operations
Influence of invasive species on ecosystem health 8 Ecosystem
Contaminant sources, fate, and transport 7 Human
Storm water management – investigate different methods for
county‐wide storm water management, and identify GIS
information/layers needed to support storm water management
7 Ecosystem
Economic evaluation of maritime and recreational activities 6 Stewardship
Evaluate economic impact of dredging on “non‐traditional”
(smaller) channels and innovative methods of dredging 6 Operations
How does climate variability affect pollution, sediments,
organic compounds, and nutrient delivery 6 Climate
How has built environment affected rainfall, water
penetration, and seawater penetration into aquifer 6 Climate
Deposition from atmospheric, ballast water, people and
equipment 5 Human
Identification of
changing
land
‐use
patterns
and
creating
predictive models 5 Stewardship
Identification of how current cultural practices impact the
environment
‐Sustainability of existing cultural practices
5 Stewardship
Impacts of super panamex vessels on ports, transport, and
environmental quality 5 Operations
Syndromic surveillance to trigger public health response 5 Human
Economic and environmental impacts of short‐water
commodity trips vs. land‐ based transport (i.e. state
docks Hyundai)
4 Operations
Impacts of
human
‐made
structures
(on
harmful
algae
blooms,
pathogens, and other human health concerns) 4 Human
Improve capability and coordination of emergency evacuation
procedures for emergency management 4 Resilience
109
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 234/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Better Understanding of Different Restoration Techniques
(Comparative Analysis)
‐Investigate variables that impact success (sediment type,
plant type, slope, etc.) ‐Research techniques to improve function
3 Ecosystem
Identify nutrient threshold levels that impact health 3 Human
Identify offshore sand resources for use in beach nourishment 3 Resilience
Status and trends of biological species 3 Stewardship
Water quality and quantity impacts on Gulf of Mexico systems
(including estuaries) 3 Operations
Assess economic and social vulnerabilities of coastal
communities 2 Resilience
Impact of sea‐level rise on coastal development
(built environment) 2 Climate
Impacts and better prediction of sea level change on commerce
and inland businesses and coastal communities 2 Operations
Understand systems involved and develop best management
practices in maintaining navigational channels 2 Operations
Identify sentinel species for harmful agents 1 Human
Investigate historical, topographical, and bathymetric
vulnerability to shoreline breach 1 Resilience
Socioeconomic impacts of climate change on
coastal communities 1 Climate
Understanding ecosystem coupling of inland and coastal/
near‐shore environments 1 Stewardship
Effects of
water
temperature,
salinity
and
pH
on
pathogenicity/virulence 0 Human
110
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 235/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Acknowledgements
This workshop would not have been possible without the support of numerous individuals. Thank you to all
of the following:
Host:
Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (Philip Hinesley, Shonda Borden, Hank Burch,
and Carl Ferraro)
Sponsors and workshop support:
NOAA National Sea Grant College Program
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (LaDon Swann, Kay Bruening, and John Grigsby)
Facilitation support:
Gulf Coast Services Center (Heidi Recksiek and Tina Sanchez)
Mississippi‐Alabama
Sea
Grant
Consortium
(Jody
Thompson
and
Rick
Wallace)
Mobile Bay National Estuary Program (Roberta Swann)
Weeks Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (Michael Shelton)
Workshop participants:
See appendix C.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Principal Investigators:
LaDon Swann, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Charles Wilson, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Bob Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program
Karl
Havens,
Florida
Sea
Grant
College
Program
111
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 236/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Appendix A:
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Workshop Agenda
5 Rivers—Alabama’s Delta Resource Center
Spanish Fort, Alabama
January 15,
2008
10:00 a.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Workshop Agenda
10:00‐10:15 Check‐in, coffee
10:15‐10:50 Welcome and Purpose of the GMRP workshop (all participants)
10:50‐11:00 Small Group Session Goals and Objectives (all participants)
11:00‐Noon Identify Research Topics within Themes (breakout group)
Noon‐12:15 Break and Pick‐up Lunches
12:15‐1:30 Refine and Prioritize Research Topics—working lunch (breakout group)
1:30‐2:00 Groups Present Top Research Topics for each Theme (all participants)
2:00‐2:30 Voting Session of all Research Topics (all participants)
2:30‐2:45 Wrap up (all participants)
112
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 237/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Appendix B:
Process diagram to identify and prioritize research topics at the GMRP workshop
113
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 238/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Appendix C:
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
First Name Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Becky
Allee
NOAA Gulf
Coast
Services
Center
becky.allee@noaa.gov
Yolanda Brady Auburn University bradyyj@auburn.edu
Kelly Brinkman ALDCNR State Lands, Coastal Section kelly.brinkman@dcnr.alabama.gov
David Brommer University of Alabama dmbrommer@ua.edu
Michael Carron Northern Gulf Institute MCarron@NGI.MSState.edu
Jennifer Denson Partners for Environmental Progress jdenson@pepmobile.org
Dennis DeVries Auburn University devridr@auburn.edu
Andrew Diller University of Florida IFAS Extension ‐
Escambia County apdiller@ufl.edu
Carol Dorsey AL Dept of Public Health caroldorsey@adph.state.al.us
Brett Dungan Alabama Working Waterfront Coalition B.Dungan@MasterMarineInc.com
Jean
Ellis
NASA Stennis
Space
Center
jean.t.ellis@nasa.gov
Carl Ferraro ADCNR‐SLD‐Coastal Section carl.ferraro@dcnr.alabama.gov
Douglas Fruge US Fish & Wildlife Service doug_fruge@fws.gov
Joseph Grant NASA Stennis Space Center joseph.grant@nasa.gov
Ken Halanych Auburn University ken@auburn.edu
Candy Hansard Emerald Coast Reef Association candy@valp.net
Danny Hardin The University of Alabama‐Huntsville dhardin@itsc.uah.edu
Ronald Heveran Fairhope Environmental Board rheveran@bellsouth.net
Bob Higgins Baldwin County Economic
Development Alliance bhiggins@baldwineda.com
Phillip Hinesley Alabama State Lands Phillip.Hinesley@dcnr.alabama.gov
Joie Horn Alabama Dept.
of
Environmental
Management MJHorn@adem.state.al.us
Harvey Joanning Smart Coast; U of South Alabama joanning@iastate.edu
Stephen Jones Geological Survey of Alabama sjones@gsa.state.al.us
Kelly Knowlton Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Kelly.Knowlton‐1@nasa.gov
Bethany Kraft Alabama Coastal Foundation bkraft@joinacf.org
Russell Ladd Mobile Bay NEP deltarliii@aol.com
Hugh MacIntyre Dauphin Island Sea Lab hmacintyre@disl.org
Herb Malone AL Gulf Coast CVB hmalone@gulfshores.com
Joanne McDonough Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Extension jmcdonough@gulfshores.com
Behzad
Mortazavi
Dauphin Island
Sea
Lab
bmortazavi@ua.edu
Jim Nienow Valdosta State University jnienow@valdosta.edu
Kenneth Odom USGS krodom@usgs.gov
Julie Olson University of Alabama jolson@bama.ua.edu
Steve Perry The FORUM sperry@hdaissues.com
Craig Peterson NASA Stennis Space Center Craig.A.Peterson@NASA.GOV
Scott Phipps Weeks Bay NERR scott.phipps@dcnr.alabama.gov
Hal Pierce NEP CAPTHAL1@aol.com
Akshinthala Prasad Florida State University Prasad@bio.fsu.edu
114
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 239/291
GMRP Appendix F
Alabama Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name Last
Name Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Heidi Recksiek* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center Heidi.Recksiek@noaa.gov
Tina Sanchez* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center Tina.Sanchez@noaa.gov
Elizabeth Sanders Downtown Mobile Alliance esanders@downtownmobile.org
Neil Sass Alabama Dept of Public Health nsass@adph.state.al.us
Steve Sempier* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium Stephen.sempier@usm.edu
Jason Senkbeil University of Alabama jcsenkbeil@bama.ua.edu
Michael Shelton* Weeks Bay NERR/ADCNR/SLD michael.shelton@dcnr.alabama.gov
Homer Singleton Wolf Bay Watershed Watch
Roberta Swann* Mobile Bay National Estuary Program rswann@mobilebaynep.com
LaDon Swann* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium swanndl@auburn.edu
Jody Thompson* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Extension Program thomp13@auburn.edu
John Valentine Dauphin Island Sea Lab jvalentine@disl.org
Mark Van Hoose ADCNR/MRD mark.vanhoose@dcnr.alabama.gov
Chris Verlinde FL Sea Grant Extension chrismv@ufl.edu
Rick Wallace* Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Extension Program wallark@auburn.edu
PJ Waters Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Extension Program waterph@acesag.auburn.edu
*Workshop facilitator or floater.
115
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 240/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning
Workshop Report
For the workshop held in
St. Petersburg, Florida on
February 19, 2008
Workshops were partially funded through a grant provided by the
National Sea Grant College Program to:
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Florida Sea Grant College Program
Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Texas Sea Grant College Program
116
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 241/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Background
The purpose of the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan (GMRP) is to identify regional research and information
needs and develop a strategy to address these needs through collaboration with agencies and organizations
that conduct and use Gulf of Mexico‐related research. The project is sponsored by the National Sea Grant
College Program and Gulf of Mexico Sea Grant College Programs. The GMRP is rooted in stakeholder input,
and workshops were one of the primary methods used to collect this input. Workshops were held in each
Gulf of Mexico state and supported by numerous individuals (see acknowledgements section). This report
provides the results from the workshop at the USGS Florida Integrated Science Center, St. Petersburg,
Florida.
The workshop agenda (appendix A) was designed to identify high‐priority research topics related to the six
societal themes described in the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology’s 2007 document
“Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States for the Next Decade—An Ocean Research
Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy.” The themes included:
stewardship of natural and cultural ocean resources,
increasing resilience to natural hazards,
enabling marine operations, the ocean’s role in climate,
improving ecosystem health, and
enhancing human health.
A process (appendix B) was developed to allow workshop participants (appendix C) to efficiently develop a
list of research priorities in a limited amount of time. Participants were divided into breakout groups by
theme area to discuss specific research topics, information needs, and other topics that related to their theme
area. Individuals in the breakout group then voted for the research topics discussed in their session that they
believed were most important. The eight to ten topics with the highest votes were then presented to all
workshop participants. All workshop participants then voted for these top research topics across all theme
areas.
This report presents 1) the results of the breakout group voting for each theme area, 2) the non‐research
topics discussed in each breakout group, and 3) the results of the large group voting session across all theme
areas.
If you will be using the information provided in this report for planning or other purposes we would like to
hear from you. For more information about the Gulf of Mexico Research Planning effort or to share how you
will be using the results of the GMRP workshop(s) please contact Steve Sempier, Gulf of Mexico Research
Planning Coordinator, at stephen.sempier@usm.edu.
You can also learn more about the GMRP at the project’s web site at: masgc.org/gmrp.
117
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 242/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Breakout Group Results
Participants in each themed breakout group identified research needs and voted for the research topics they
believed were most important. Each participant was provided eight votes and they could place up to two
votes on an individual research topic.
Prior to the voting session some breakout groups combined multiple ideas that were mentioned during the
brainstorming session, and therefore crossed out similar ideas so that they would not be available during the
voting session. The tables below include all comments written on the flip chart paper, and those topics that
were crossed out on the flip chart paper are indicated with a strike through in the table.
Information needs and policy, management, and education related topics were also captured in the breakout
group sessions but were not voted on for the prioritization process. The results of these discussions are also
included under each themed heading.
118
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 243/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Research Needs
Table 1. Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources” breakout
group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Effectiveness of education about these resources and examine
our methodology 9
Understand connectivity of related fisheries species from
coastal habitats across shelf to shelf edge habitat 8
Economic value / costs of restoration, habitat, ecological
benefits 6
Understand habitat change over time ‐ what is and isnʹt
sustainable 6
Understand resource / fisheries abundance ‐ historic
sustainability and current abundance ‐ what is
sustainable?
6
What are the options from (snapper / grouper) labor
dynamics and alternatives for fishing communities,
socioeconomic impact of managing fisheries?
6
Connectivity of offshore hard bottom areas throughout the
Gulf of Mexico “Islands in the Stream” concept (species
specific)
5
Determine nourishment effects/timing and recovery on
effective affected habitats/benthic and physical ocean
acoustic
5
Look at historical, current, and future impacts of oil and gas
industry on biodiversity; effect of oil and gas pipeline
structure, both active and not
5
Understand habitat connectivity to help manage fisheries;
how fisheries use connecting habitats 5
Physical and ecological comparisons of shoreline
stabilization > natural versus hard armor 4
Devise efficient and effective methods to map oyster reefs;
intertidal and subtidal, preferably in 3‐D 3
Understand fisheries potential, sustainability, and potential
impacts on
deep
water
reefs
and
shelf
edge
reefs
‐What are the impacts of fishing it/harvesting?
‐What is there, what is the fishing potential?
3
119
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 244/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 1 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean
Resources” breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Biotic and abiotic effects of fire suppression of coastal scrub
(bird nesting > invertebrates) versus watershed 2
Ecosystem services and value to guide management;
evaluate habitat restoration benefit over time given sea‐
level rise
2
Marine debris eradication and what is safe to leave or not 2
Study of sound in water and impacts to species (human
sounds) 2
Understand and assess status of deepwater and mesopelagic
zones and shelf beds/reefs 2
Biochemical impacts on species (i.e., toxicology) 1
Impact of fisheries on communities (reduce gear impacts) 1
Impacts to species biodiversity from anthropological and
natural impacts ‐ shifting baselines 1
Methods to fill assess the status of data limited fisheries 1
Near shore current patterns as conduits for connectivity 1
Retreat patterns of inter and subtidal habitats with SLR and
how people are using coastal resources 1
Cost of switching gear versus value to ecosystem 0
Determine vulnerable species to manage ecosystem 0
How effective are gear modifications? 0
Look at values of socio‐economic classes positions and look
how that translates to action 0
Relationship between location, abundance, and human use of
the resource 0
Water column on west Florida shelf interaction between
surface, pelagic, and benthic/trophic zones 0
Cedar Key interaction between near shore, open ocean, and
watershed 0
Effect of leaving platforms as artificial reefs ‐ habitats,
function, biodiversity, etc. (before and after it has been
abandoned)
0
Historic habitat and determine what is sustainable > do we
determine sustainability based on now or then shifting
baselines
0
Interactions between trophic zones 0
120
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 245/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources
Information Needs
Big Bend of Florida ‐ need to know more
Cost versus benefit of fishing gear modifications
Economic information about ecosystem services Economic value / cost
Effectiveness of education and outreach
Impact of managing fisheries
Map oyster reefs throughout Gulf of Mexico
Values of socio‐economic positions
Depth/water column
From watershed across shelf to edge habitat & species ‐ snapper/grouper
Long shore around Gulf of Mexico
Policy,
Management
or
Education
Topics
Educate human reference points
Large scale mapping efforts
121
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 246/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards
Research Needs
Table 2. Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Several topics combined for voting:
‐Economic study of tourism on community resiliency
relative vulnerability of various classes of tourism‐‐
interdependency
‐Economic study of coastal development. True cost versus
benefits. Who pays? Cross‐subsidies, health costs, social
costs.
‐Economic study of fisheries and recreational/commercial
fisheries‐‐an economic model of recovery/resiliency of
fisheries‐‐
health/marine debris
‐Improve storm surge modeling‐‐finer scale topo / bathy
‐The impacts of sea‐level rise on surge modeling and
decisions based on modeling
9
Storm surge and wind force/speed
‐Energy dissipation associated with various tree types
‐Ecosystems, built environment, land use (how the loss of
these systems impact) and its mitigation benefits
‐Study the true value of ecosystems on storm mitigation‐‐
the economics of ecosystem services
5
Critical Infrastructure
‐Bridge
design
‐‐Performance
in
hydrodynamic
conditions.
(e.g. Ivan‐damage. How transportation system would
perform)
‐Port facilities‐‐Engineering design research. Ports as critical
facilities. (e.g. Tampa petroleum services)
4
Behavioral science hurricane evacuation. Why people behave
given various risks confronting them. 3
Marine debris modeling
‐Where, what will end up offshore and how that may
impact pick‐up and damage to fisheries sand other
services
3
Coupled surge flood models
‐River floods/surge‐‐understand the combined impacts 2
Phosphate mining standards
‐Effluent in surface waters
‐Economic impacts of spills
‐Modeling of potential for spills
2
Research on the resiliency of data collection. Wind/water‐‐
design standards. These data collection systems must
perform in storms to be of full value
2
122
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 247/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 2 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards”
breakout group and voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Modeling droughts, climate change, and how lack of water
impacts ecosystem resiliency 1
Potable surface water supply
‐Study land use effluents‐runoff categories as to how they
would recover after storms (e.g. HAB’s )
‐Modeling to predict how the reservoirs would be impacted
1
HAB’s
‐Events‐predict the impacts allow communities to adapt
‐Community pilots to I.D. HAB’s risk and adaptation
0
Studies of communities that have been impacted by storms
versus those that have not‐‐ behavior related to experience 0
Information Needs
FL Bathy
FL‐ DEM‐ Redelineate SLOSH
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Education of the public‐‐understanding difference between flooding (flood insurance)/storm
surge (evacuation)
Mandates for following the plans that exist. Requirements for following the plan
Phosphate mining policy/standards potential for cathosplumes
Ports facilities‐‐standards for design
123
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 248/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Research Needs
Table 3. Research topics identified by the “Enabling Marine Operations” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Develop GIS databases (layers) that characterize the marine
& coastal environment as well as human uses
‐Need to develop missing layers and/or extension of
onshore databases
‐Automate mechanism to incorporate existing and new
data (real time) (clearing house)
10
Impact of larger ports for larger vessels, and conflict of
multiple uses 7
Creating new predictive tools (models) to test the impact of specific activities (remodeling of coastal power plants)
beach renourishment
6
Establish baseline conditions to better understand the impact
of maritime operations on human and environmental health 6
Run sensors using GIS to prioritize water way maintenance
and navigation. Linked to value 5
What is the value ($) (up and down sides) of maritime
activities (looking at economic or environmental impacts of
different alternatives)
5
Impact of short sea shipping 2
Need to identify invasive species that are transported in ballast discharged fluids/other mechanical methods
(trailers)
‐Look at controlling
2
New navigational aids to better inform and direct traffic to
enhance habitat protection and human safety 2
124
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 249/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Enabling Marine Operations
Information Needs
Environmental inventory (species & habitat)
GIS navigational layer identifying navigational rules, distribution and changes (10 speed zone)
Human uses (maritime environmental) Mapping & benthic habitat needed
Need comprehensive (adaptable/consistent/comparable) study plans to respond to a variety of
commercial activities in various environments
Results of predictive models and level of success
Standardization of economic value of a specific object or animal (value of barrier island or
manatee)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Are
marine
discharge
policies
being
enforced
and
are
they
helping
or
improving
environmental
conditions?
Maps & education for tourists and out‐of‐area visitors
Need to get the US Coast Guard engaged with research and navigation and water safety
information
Partnerships with policy makers to provide information, communication to user groups
(funding to develop products)
Preservation of working waterfronts and commercial and recreational destination
125
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 250/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
The Ocean’s Role in Climate
Research Needs
Table 4. Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting results from
the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Model/temperature effects on hydrology and temperature in
the Gulf of Mexico; better regional land view
Research and modeling how pollution (i.e., Mississippi
River) and flow water influxes will respond to circulation
changes resulting from climate change
‐Groundwater
‐Nutrients
15
Where are the best locations for sensors
‐Gap analysis
‐Redundancy ‐Money
Consider wind, climatological hotspots, atmospheric, ocean
circulation, Gulf of Mexico circulation
14
Physical, chemical, and environmental tolerances for (larvae)
all species within Gulf of Mexico
‐Temperature/salinity
‐Light
‐Winds
‐CO2
Effects of climate change on population dynamics and
community dynamics
‐Pathogens/disease
‐Distribution and range
‐Fisheries and invasive species
13
Examine important components of carbon sink/source for
baseline Gulf of Mexico
Address impacts of CO2/acidification
‐Calcification rates
‐Trace metal chemistry
‐Biological systems/corals
11
Need to develop coastal algorithms for satellite data analysis
(dissolved organic matter, gas exchange, transmittance; how
these factors change with climate change)
11
Extreme weather events on Gulf of Mexico scale
Generation of…
‐Impacts ‐ environmental/economic
‐Frequency
‐Intensity
10
126
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 251/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 4 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Ocean’s Role in Climate” breakout group and voting
results from the breakout group voting session.
Development of models to predict sea‐level rise throughout
Gulf of Mexico (new or tweak existing models) 5
Social science/human dimension relative to decision makers
(how they process, understand, and apply climate change
science ‐ assessment/metrics) 1
Look at terrestrial/ocean/atmospheric (climate) variability on
a more refined scale
‐Historical ‐ to improve forecasting/mitigation
0
Information Needs
Grad student mandate ‐ social sciences
Support: o Radar, bathymetry ‐ fill gaps
Increase range ‐ landward; develop means to measure seaward
Satellites going offline ‐ more gaps in ability to monitor on large scale (e.g.,
location of loop current)
o More refined scale ‐ spatial and temporal to make cross‐connections
DM (Database management) protocol/central distribution DMAC (Database
Management Analysis Center)
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Analysis of:
o Users/stakeholders / MPA public forums
o ID data sources ‐ archived, real‐time, and other
o ID research funding sources
o Forecasts required ‐ drives, instrument demands
Briefing materials for communicators & environmental journalists
Develop educational materials/workshops for formal and informal educators
Policy scenarios for decision‐makers and coastal stake‐holders
127
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 252/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Research Needs
Table 5. Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Freshwater inputs ‐‐ effects on ecosystem. Need to examine
what really happens in the field under current
permitting/development practices. Also need research
linkages between reductions in freshwater inputs and
benthic communities, tropic interactions, fisheries, shifts
in emergent coastal habitats, and sediment
transport/erosion.
14
New models for ecosystem‐ based management
‐Need models for fisheries, and other key components to
model include habitat, threatened/endangered/protected species, cumulative impacts, and systematic ecosystem
overview
‐Need to define ecosystem based management components
in order to allow comparisons across the GOM. (NOAA
Regional Coordination Team is discussing an integrated
ecosystem assessment in the Gulf)
14
Research on how to present information most effectively, in a
user‐friendly way. How to disseminate and present to
public.
13
Need socioeconomic research
‐Research
on
the
social
aspects
/ anthropologic
characteristics of coastal communities
‐Need to look at impacts of environmental changes on social
communities
‐Also need to determine the social and economic drivers in
communities that do or do not lead to caring about the
resource / conservation action. For example, could do an
analysis of how different GOM communities have
decided to develop and explore why different
‐Socioeconomic research should be used to help figure out
how to optimize future coastal development to minimize
environmental impacts, maximize quality of life, and
maintain public access
12
Marine Protected Areas (MPAʹs) research
‐Role of MPA’s in ecosystem management, how to measure
effectiveness
‐More research to support the ʺIslands in the Streamʺ
concept (system of MPA’s around the GOM) ‐‐ specifically
looking at larval transport, how different proposed sites
are connected
7
128
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 253/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Need greater understanding of factors that affect
productivity based on the habitat needs of species.
Including the benthic link to fisheries ‐When benthic habitats are destroyed what are the impacts?
‐Need to examine the cumulative impacts of habitat loss
‐Also need to look at connections between wetland
characteristics and productivity (e.g. edge.)
7
How can genuine change in ecosystem structure and
function be discerned with greater certainty?
‐Lots of talk about there being more HAB’s, more variability
in system, but hard to be certain – difficult to know for
sure when it isn’t just natural variability. (e.g. on HAB’s
don’t have the data resolution to know whether natural
variability)
‐Other example issues are coral bleaching, rising sea
temperatures.
‐How do we know when ecosystem changes from one state
(dynamic equilibrium) to another? And can we attribute
the change to natural or anthropogenic sources?
6
How are anthropogenic stressors to Gulf ecosystems like
natural stressors and how do they differ? (perturbation
theory) For example, wetland loss in Louisiana is due to
both natural and anthropogenic causes – how are
responses similar and how are they different?
5
Do
some
open
ocean
aquaculture
to
understand
the
impacts,
both positive and negative. Should do carefully, take an
adaptive management approach.
3
Impacts of oil and gas drilling on plankton 2
Quantify differential effects of different fisheries
management techniques (artificial reefs, marine managed
areas, effort limitations, total allowable catch (TAC), stock
enhancement)
2
Research impacts on benthic infauna from beach
renourishment. Need to know whether we should worry
about it.
2
Research iron “seeding” concept (adding iron to stimulate
phytoplankton growth to suck up carbon) 2
129
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 254/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 5 (continued). Research topics identified by the “Improving Ecosystem Health” breakout group and
voting results from the breakout group voting session.
Economic value of natural resources (e.g. value of keeping
some lands) 1
Exploring the efficacy of mitigation of coastal habitats.
Looking at both the efficacy of different methods, and also
among/between different habitats 1
Liquid natural gas (LNG) facilities
‐Impacts of cycling water through
‐Need baseline information on the presence/abundance/life
history characteristics of icthyoplankton so can then
measure impacts
1
Cumulative impacts (on fisheries) of icthyoplankton losses
due to different causes. 0
Efficacy of carbon offsets 0
Impacts of wind farms on migratory birds
‐Impacts of all types of alternative energy (e.g. tide energy) 0
Research impacts of hypoxia, GOM dead zone
‐How does the dead zone impact other areas via the loop
current?
‐Other hypoxia areas emerging
0
Synthesize water quality monitoring information in order to
understand impacts on biodiversity 0
130
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 255/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Improving Ecosystem Health
Information Needs
Basic information on Florida west shelf benthic communities, whatʹs out there ‐‐ natural ledge
communities
Better coordination across all things going on in the GOM; coordination of research and
management efforts
Biodiversity of phytoplankton / microalgae (too much emphasis on harmful algal blooms ‐‐ need to
look at all.) Need repository collections
Estuary, coast, offshore linkages; modeling the linkages
Gather and synthesize existing data from state/federal/university sources
o Lots of existing research
o Need clearinghouse (GOMA Habitat Identification team is working on this for habitat)
High resolution
maps
of
shelf
and
slope
exist
for
TX
and
LA,
and
these
need
to
be
extended
around
the Gulf. Requires multibeam. Good educational tools as well
Information needs re: open ocean aquaculture
Synthesize and translate information for use by management community
Water quality and nutrient run‐off ‐‐ need synthesis of monitoring information
Policy, Management or Education Topics
Incentives for leaving open land
Need to provide context for why people need to care about the ecosystem (this is an a priori need to
get
the
political
will.)
Need
education
about
how
impacts
people
directly
Open ocean aquaculture ‐‐ need policies (GOM Fisheries Management Council working on an
amendment about this currently; National policy is currently stalled.)
Smart growth
131
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 256/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Research Needs
Table 6. Research topics identified by the “Enhancing Human Health” breakout group and voting results
from the breakout group voting session.
Research Topic Votes
Integrated study to determine the effects of wastewater to
water quality / human health (source of contaminant,
especially as it relates to sewage treatment)
8
Research new and better technologies for addressing sewage
treatment / pharmaceuticals and costs 6
Evaluate the long‐ and short‐term human exposure risk to
marine aerosolized Brevetoxins and other HABʹs 5
Better / improved method to eliminate pathogens /
pharmaceuticals during harvesting and processing of
seafood
4
Research link between climate change / sea‐level change and
how that will affect human health 4
Evaluate the geographic extent of contaminants in
commercially harvested fish and shellfish 3
Research rapid assessment for mitigating human health
impact from coastal hazards 3
Research the effect of pharmaceuticals on ecosystems and
human health including best disposal methods for
pharmaceuticals
3
Research to predict conditions favorable to HABʹs and
forecast health risk
3
Continue to do research in marine biotechnology to develop
pharmaceuticals and products that enhance human health 2
Evaluate impact of cruise ship or other large vessel waste
disposal 2
What are the cumulative impacts associated with increased
human activities to human health along the coast? 2
What is the ecosystem impacts of the harvest of marine life
that have human health benefits? 0
Evaluate localized disposal of treated waste water versus
off‐shore disposal 0
132
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 257/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Enhancing Human Health
Information Needs
Are there bioproducts to enhance human health that are being lost due to ecosystem
degradation?
Develop list of pharmaceuticals that have been identified in fish / others
Develop list of seafood processing methods and imports
Evaluate what are the best, most‐current technologies for addressing sewage treatment and costs
ID source of human health contaminants
Identify different types / species of airborne health risks
Develop comprehensive database in real time (IOOS) and integrate existing HAB information
What is current situation? What would change with sea‐level change and higher temperatures?
Policy, Management or Education Topics
BMP’s
for
cruise
ships
or
other
large
vessels
for
the
disposal
of
waste
Consistent management of septic systems
Increase in education regarding human health implications related to disposal of
pharmaceuticals
Policy on imported seafood quality
What is the acceptable balance between harvest of marine life for human health and protection
of the resource?
What regulation changes will have to be made as coastal communities shift to seawater for
drinking water?
133
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 258/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Overall Results—Research Priorities Determined in Large Group Voting Session
The research topics presented in Table 7 were derived from the highest rated topics from each of the themed
breakout groups. The column titled, “Theme,” in Table 7 corresponds to the breakout group from which the
research topic originated. The following codes were used: stewardship of natural and cultural ocean
resources (Stewardship), increasing resilience to natural hazards (Resilience), improving ecosystem health
(Ecosystem), enabling marine operations (Operations), enhancing human health (Human), and the ocean’s role in climate (Climate).
Each participant had 12 votes for the large group voting session and could place up to two votes for any one
research topic.
Note that in some cases research topics presented by different breakout groups were very similar. An in‐
depth analysis of similar topics identified within and between workshops will be discussed in a later report.
Table 7. Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme areas.
Research Topic
Votes
Theme
Understand connectivity among populations and habitats
‐Watershed to shelf edge
‐Fisheries management
‐Shelf edge deep water hard bottom habitat
30 Stewardship
Fresh‐water inputs ‐ effects on ecosystem
‐Examine what really happens in the field under current
building and permitting practices (i.e. current impacts)
‐Examine/project impacts of reductions on benthic
communities, trophic interactions, fisheries, emergent
coastal habitats, sediment transport / erosion
28 Ecosystem
Marine Protected
Areas
(MPA’s)
research
‐How to measure effectiveness
‐Role in ecosystem management
‐Research to support the ʺIslands in the Streamʺ proposal in
the GOMEX (e.g. larval transport, connectivity between
sites)
27 Ecosystem
Develop GIS databases (layers) that characterize the marine
and coastal environment
‐Develop additional layers or create extensions of onshore
data layers
‐Develop automated mechanism to incorporate existing and
new data (real time)
‐Identify a clearing house for data and layers
25 Operations
Economics research of coastal development. True costs, true
benefits, including economic modeling of damage to
fisheries production, various classes of recreation, and many
other aspects of community resiliency
25 Resilience
134
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 259/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
What are the effects of climate change on population and
community dynamics?
‐Emergence / prevalence of pathogens
‐Distribution and range changes ‐Effects on biology of invasive species
‐Response of organisms to changing levels of: temperature,
salinity, light, winds, CO2 , etc.
22 Climate
Understand habitat change over time ‐ what is / is not
sustainable? 20 Stewardship
Integrated study to determine effects of wastewater to water
quality / human health (source of contaminant ‐ especially as
it relates to sewage treatment)
19 Human
Where are the best locations for sensors? (data collection)
‐Wind
‐Climatological hot spots ‐Gulf of Mexico
‐Atmospheric / ocean circulation
‐GAP analysis
‐Redundancy
‐$
19 Climate
Need new models for ecosystem‐ based management
‐Considering fisheries, habitat, threatened / endangered
species, ecosystem processes
‐Need to define ecosystem based management components
to allow comparisons across different areas in the Gulf
18 Ecosystem
Socio‐economic
research;
social
aspects
of
coastal
communities
and impacts of environmental change on communities
‐Includes looking at social and economic drivers that
influence whether communities do / donʹt care about
resources; look at why communities make different
conservation decisions
‐Research how to optimize future coastal development to
minimize environmental impacts, maximize quality of life,
and maintain public access
18 Ecosystem
Understand the effectiveness of education about resources and
examine our methodology 18 Stewardship
How can
genuine
change
in
ecosystem
structure
and
function
be discerned with more certainty
‐Hard to know when itʹs more than natural variability
‐e.g. changes in HAB’s, coral bleaching
‐How to know when real change from one system state to
another?
16 Ecosystem
135
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 260/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
How will climate change affect hydrology on land, in coastal
regions and open oceans ‐ with a focus on interactive
processes (pollution, freshwater influx, nutrients,
groundwater)
16 Climate
Understand resource / fisheries abundance ‐ historic
sustainability and current abundance: what is sustainable? 12 Stewardship
Evaluate long and short term human exposure risk to marine
aerosolized Brevetoxins and other HAB’s 10 Human
Research on how to present information most effectively, and
in a user‐friendly way (how to disseminate and present to
public)
‐e.g. GIS layers, web‐ based products (efficacy of different
delivery mechanisms)
‐e.g. use of the media
10 Ecosystem
What are the important components for a baseline carbon sink
/ source for GOM and what are the impacts of changing CO2
on ocean acidification and biogeochemistry and the
subsequent biological consequences
10 Climate
The resiliency of data collection platforms ‐ engineering
designs of data collection systems in severe events 9 Resilience
Storm surge modeling
‐Improvements in DEMs (topo / bathy) and how it influences
results
‐Sea‐level rise component of surge modeling
8 Resilience
Wind speed / storm surge energy dissipation as it interfaces
with wetlands
and
uplands
vegetation.
Understanding
the
mitigation benefits of vegetation and the economic value of
these buffers.
8 Resilience
Research to predict conditions favorable to HAB’s and forecast
health risk 7 Human
What is the value ($) (up and down sides) of maritime
activities (looking at economic or environmental impacts of
different alternatives)
7 Operations
Determine re‐nourishment effects / timing and recovery on
affected habitats / physical oceanography 6 Stewardship
Marine debris ‐ modeling, predicting‐‐type, location, impacts /
economics of
withdrawal
6 Resilience
Need greater understanding or factors that affect productivity
based on habitat needs of species. Includes research on
benthic link to fisheries, understanding cumulative impacts
of habitat losses
6 Ecosystem
Research link between climate change / sea level change and
how that will affect human health 6 Human
136
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 261/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Research the effects of pharmaceuticals on ecosystem and
human health including best disposal methods for
pharmaceuticals
6 Human
What is the impact of larger ports (to accommodate larger deep
draft vessels) and conflicts with multiple use areas
(recreational fishing, environmentally sensitive areas)
6 Operations
Development of models to predict sea‐level rise throughout
the GOM (new or enhance existing models) 5 Climate
Economic / engineering studies of phosphate mining and its
risk to coastal resources 5 Resilience
Study extreme weather events in the GOM including
‐Generation of events
‐Impacts ‐ environmental and economic
‐Frequency and intensity
5 Climate
Coupled modeling for storm surge / river flooding 4 Resilience
Creating new predictive tools (models) to test the impact of
specific activities (remodeling of coastal power plants) beach
renourishment
4 Operations
Economic value / costs on restoration, habitat, ecological
benefits 4 Stewardship
Establish baseline conditions to better understanding of the
impact of maritime operations on human and environmental
health
4 Operations
Evaluate the human dimension ‐ e.g. relative to decision
makers. Develop metrics to assess how they process,
understand and apply climate change science
4 Climate
Look at historical, current, and future impacts of oil and gas
industry on biodiversity 4 Stewardship
Research on protection of critical infrastructure
‐Engineering design research. Bridges (e.g. Ivan and Katrina
examples)
‐Port facilities: dependant functionality; e.g., gasoline in
Tampa Bay
4 Resilience
Run scenarios using GIS to prioritize water way maintenance
and navigation (linked to value) 4 Operations
Better / improved method to eliminate pathogens /
pharmaceuticals during
harvesting
and
processing
of
seafood 2
Human
Research new and better technologies for addressing sewage
treatment and costs 2 Human
Water column on west Florida shelf: interaction between
surface, pelagic, and benthic / trophic zones 2 Stewardship
137
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 262/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Table 7 (continued). Results of the large voting session for high‐priority research topics across all theme
areas.
Develop algorithms for coastal satellite data (dissolved organic
materials, gas exchange, etc. ‐ how these change with climate
change)
1 Climate
Evaluate geographic extent of contaminants in commercially
harvested fish and shellfish 1 Human
What are the options for labor dynamics and alternatives for
fishing communities / socio‐economic impact 1 Stewardship
Behavioral science; e.g. hurricane evacuation ‐ why people
make risk based decisions or not 0 Resilience
Evaluate localized disposal of treated wastewater versus
offshore disposal 0 Human
138
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 263/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Acknowledgements
This workshop would not have been possible without the support of numerous individuals. Thank you to all
of the following:
Host:
USGS Florida Integrated Science Center (Jack Kindinger and Sandy Coffman)
Sponsors and workshop support:
NOAA National Sea Grant College Program
Florida Sea Grant (Karl Havens and Chris Simoniello)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (LaDon Swann, Kay Bruening, and John Grigsby)
Facilitation support:
Gulf Coast Services Center (Heidi Recksiek, Todd Davison, and Ann Weaver)
Florida Sea
Grant
(Chris
Simoniello
and
Betty
Staugler)
USGS (Jack Kindinger)
Workshop participants:
See appendix C.
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Principal Investigators:
LaDon Swann, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Charles Wilson, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program
Bob Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program
Karl Havens, Florida Sea Grant College Program
Transcription support:
Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (Kelly Knowlton)
Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant Consortium (Kay Bruening, John Grigsby, Devaney Cheramie,
Loretta Leist, Melissa Schneider, and Valerie Winn)
139
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 264/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Appendix A:
Gulf of Mexico Research Planning Workshop Agenda
U.S. Geological Survey Florida Integrated Science Center
St. Petersburg, Florida
February 19,
2008
10:00 a.m. – 2:45 p.m.
Workshop Agenda
10:00‐10:15 Check‐in, coffee
10:15‐10:40 Welcome and Purpose of the GMRP workshop (all participants)
10:40‐10:45 Small Group Session Goals and Objectives (all participants)
10:45‐11:45 Identify Research Topics within Themes (breakout group)
11:45‐12:10 Break and Pick‐up Lunches
12:10‐1:30 Refine and Prioritize Research Topics—includes breakout group
voting session (breakout group)
1:30‐2:00 Groups Present Top Research Topics for each Theme (all participants)
2:00‐
2:30
Voting
Session
of
all
Research
Topics
(all
participants)
2:30‐2:45 Wrap up (all participants)
2:45‐ Optional tour of USGS facilities
140
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 265/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 266/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Appendix C:
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
First Name
Last
Name
Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Lori
Adornato
SRI International
lori.adornato@sri.com
Bill Arnold Florida FWCC/FWRI bill.arnold@myfwc.com
Michael Bailey NOAA michael.bailey@noaa.gov
Kyle Baker National Marine Fisheries Service kyle.baker@noaa.gov
Don Behringer University of Florida behringer@ufl.edu
Seth Blitch Apalachicola National Estuarine
Research Reserve seth.blitch@dep.state.fl.us
Robert Bourke Tanks‐A‐Lot Dive Charters scuba@tanksalotdivecharter.com
Cristina Carollo FL Institute of Oceanography/FL Fish
and Wildlife Research Institute Cristina.Carollo@MyFWC.com
Leslie Craig NOAA Restoration Center Leslie.Craig@noaa.gov
Veronica Craw Southwest Florida
Water
Management
District veronica.craw@swfwmd.state.fl.us
Miles Croom NMFS miles.croom@noaa.gov
Todd Davison* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center todd.davison@noaa.gov
Jennifer Dupont University of South Florida College of
Marine Science jdupont@marine.usf.edu
Lee Edmiston Apalachicola National Estuarine
Research Reserve lee.edmiston@dep.state.fl.us
Ernie Estevez Mote Marine Lab & FOCC estevez@mote.org
Eric Fehrmann Pinellas County Dept. of Env. Mgmt. efehrman@pinellascounty.org
Sandra Gilchrist New College of Florida, Pritzker
Marine Lab
gilchrist@ncf.edu
Joseph Grant NASA/SSC joseph.grant@nasa.gov
Christina Gwaltney Rookery Bay NERR christina.gwaltney@dep.state.fl.us
Karl Havens Florida Sea Grant College Program khavens@ufl.edu
James Hendee NOAA/AOML (Miami) jim.hendee@noaa.gov
Steve Kearl Florida Sea Grant skearl@ufl.edu
Brian Keller NOAA Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries brian.keller@noaa.gov
Jack Kindinger* USGS jkindinger@usgs.gov
Kevin Kirsch NOAA Office of Response &
Restoration kevin.kirsch@noaa.gov
Kelly Knowlton Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Kelly.Knowlton‐1@nasa.gov
Ron Mezich FL Fish & Wildlife Conservation
Commission ron.mezich@myfwc.com
Joe Murphy Gulf Restoration Network joe@healthygulf.org
Julie Neer SAFMC julie.neer@safmc.net
Charles Paxton National Weather Service charlie.paxton@noaa.gov
Akshinthala Prasad Florida State University Prasad@bio.fsu.edu
142
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 267/291
GMRP Appendix F
Florida Workshop Report
Workshop Participants and Facilitators
(continued)
First Name
Last
Name
Affiliation
E‐mail
Address
Heidi Recksiek* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center heidi.recksiek@noaa.gov
John Reed HBOI jreed12@hboi.fau.edu
Dave Reed Florida Institute of Oceanography /
FWC ‐ FWRI Dave.Reed@MyFWC.com
Lisa Robbins USGS lrobbins@usgs.gov
Nicole Robinson FDEP/CAMA/Florida Oceans and
Coastal Council nicole.robinson@dep.state.fl.us
Steve Sempier* MASGC stephen.sempier@usm.edu
Jamie Serino Shaw Group jserino111@bellsouth.net
Charles Sidman Florida Sea Grant csidman@ufl.edu
Chris Simoniello* Florida Sea Grant simo@marine.usf.edu
Kent
Smith
Florida Wildlife
Commission
kent.smith@myfwc.com
Mike Spranger Florida Sea Grant spranger@ufl.edu
Betty Staugler* Florida Sea Grant staugler@ifas.ufl.edu
Bob Stickney Texas Sea Grant stickney@tamu.edu
Beau Suthard Coastal Planning & Engineering bsuthard@coastalplanning.net
Frederick
ʺBuckʺSutter NOAA Fisheries buck.sutter@noaa.gov
LaDon Swann* MASGC swanndl@auburn.edu
Don Sweat FL Sea Grant dsweat@marine.usf.edu
Laura Thorne EPC Hillsborough County Thornel@epchc.org
Bob Trumble MRAG Americas bob.trumble@mragamericas.com
Wes Tunnell TAMU‐CC, Harte Research Institute wes.tunnell@tamucc.edu
Elke Ursin FL Dept of Health elke_ursin@doh.state.fl.us
Yyotika Virmani FL Coos Cons‐FL Institute of
Oceanography jyotika@marine.usf.edu
Robert Wakeford MRAG Americas, Inc. robert.wakeford@mragamericas.com
Ann Weaver* NOAA Gulf Coast Services Center ann.weaver@noaa.gov
Allan Willis PBS&J adwillis@pbsj.com
*Workshop facilitator or floater.
143
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 268/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix G:
Synthesis of
Non
‐Research
Topics
Discussed at Regional Workshops
This document
contains
raw
data
from
workshop
participants.
They
remain
in
this
raw
form
so that meanings are not unintentionally changed. Please keep this in mind when reading
this document.
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 269/291
Table of Contents
Background ................................................................................................................................... 1
Summary Tables........................................................................................................................... 2
Education and Communication Needs..................................................................................... 4
Information Needs ....................................................................................................................... 7
Coordination, Policy, and Management Needs..................................................................... 13
Socioeconomic Needs ................................................................................................................ 16
Other
Needs ................................................................................................................................ 17
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 270/291
Background
The purpose of the Gulf of Mexico Research Plan (GMRP) is to identify regional research and information
needs and develop a strategy to address these needs through collaboration with agencies and organizations
that conduct and use Gulf of Mexico‐related research. The project is sponsored by the National Sea Grant
College Program and Gulf of Mexico Sea Grant College Programs. The GMRP is rooted in stakeholder input,
and workshops were one of the primary methods used to collect this input. Workshops were held in each
Gulf of Mexico state and supported by numerous individuals (see acknowledgements section). This report
provides a synthesis of the non‐research topics that were discussed at the five workshops in January and
February 2008. Workshops were held in:
Galveston, Texas;
Baton Rouge, Louisiana;
Biloxi, Mississippi;
Spanish Fort, Alabama; and
St. Petersburg, Florida.
The workshops were designed to primarily identify high‐priority research topics related to the six societal themes described in the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology’s 2007 document “Charting
the Course for Ocean Science in the United States for the Next Decade—An Ocean Research Priorities Plan
and Implementation Strategy.” The themes included:
stewardship of natural and cultural ocean resources,
increasing resilience to natural hazards,
enabling marine operations,
the ocean’s role in climate,
improving ecosystem health, and
enhancing human health.
Participants were
divided
into
breakout
groups
by
theme
area
to
discuss
specific
research
topics,
information needs, and other topics that related to their theme area. This report presents the 251
non‐research topics that were identified in the breakout sessions held at the five workshop locations. Topics
could be organized into numerous categories. This report presents one option. Summary information and
the categorized comments are presented in this report.
If you will be using the information provided in this report for planning or other purposes we would like to
hear from you. For more information about the Gulf of Mexico Research Planning effort or to share how you
will be using the results of the GMRP workshop(s) please contact Steve Sempier, Gulf of Mexico Research
Planning Coordinator, at stephen.sempier@usm.edu.
You can also learn more about the GMRP at the project’s web site at: masgc.org/gmrp.
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 271/291
Summary Tables
Although the primary focus of the GMRP workshops was to identify and prioritize research needs numerous
non‐research topics were also discussed. The tables below present the number of non‐research topics that
were identify by workshop, breakout group, and category. Topics discussed in each breakout session were
placed into one of three categories. The categories were “research needs,” “information needs,” or “policy /
management / education needs.” This report provides the topics that fell within the latter two categories.
Table 1. Number of non‐research topics mentioned at each state workshop.
State
Number of
Non‐Research
Topics
Florida 64
Louisiana 57
Texas 44
Mississippi
43
Alabama 43
Total 251
Table 2. Number of non‐research topics mentioned by themed breakout group.
Theme Area
Number of
Non‐Research
Topics
Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources 53
Improving Ecosystem Health 48
Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards 41
Enabling Marine Operations 38
Enhancing Human Health 36
The Ocean’s Role in Climate 35
Total 251
Table 3. Number of non‐research topics mentioned by category.
Category
Number of
Non‐Research
Topics
Information Needs 133
Policy / Education / Management Needs 118
Total 251
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 272/291
Non‐Research Topics by Specific Category
The tables below identify the topics that were discussed (topic) and themed breakout group (theme) and
state workshop (state) from which the topics originated. The wording of topics was mostly unedited and was
copied from the workshop records. The following codes identify the theme from which the topic originated:
stewardship of natural and cultural ocean resources (Stewardship), increasing resilience to natural hazards
(Resilience), improving ecosystem health (Ecosystem), enabling marine operations (Operations), enhancing
human health (Human), and the ocean’s role in climate (Climate).
The table headings were developed after all non‐research topics were collected at the workshops. These
headings were used to organize the topics into more specific categories. Tables are organized with similar
comments grouped together within the table.
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 273/291
Education and Communication Needs
Education and Communication Issues
Topic Theme State
Awareness of how human waste management impacts the
environment Ecosystem
Alabama
Need to provide context for why people need to care about the
ecosystem (this is an a priori need to get the political will)
‐Need education about how impacts people directly
Ecosystem Florida
Need education about ecosystem health and change and the role
of people Ecosystem Mississippi
Improve education regarding individual responsibility for water
quality Human Louisiana
Awareness
Re: ʺcarbon footprintʺ or transport miles of environmental
benefit of shipping (decrease carbon costs)
Operations Louisiana
Education/outreach on sea‐level change
‐Incorporate science / models into local building codes
‐Communicate science as changes to changing municipal
officials
‐Implement smart growth policies
Climate Mississippi
Increase in education regarding human health implications related
to disposal of pharmaceuticals Human Florida
Need a better‐informed public related to pathogens Human Mississippi
Effective education on HABʹs Human Louisiana
Human health education on seafood safety Human Texas
Public understands how these changes to fisheries and habitats
impact / benefit Stewardship
Louisiana
Increase outreach into incorporating existing communication of
fishermen into aquaculture Operations Louisiana
Increase education and outreach for the general public
Re: aquaculture (offshore) Operations Louisiana
Process of educating public on recreational and commercial use of
the port / waterways for successful / non‐successful use of ports
(How do varying uses affect various user groups?)
Operations Texas
Educating citizens on reducing vulnerability / understanding of
barrier island Resilience Alabama
Educate media on responsible storm / hazard reporting Resilience Alabama
Education of the public‐‐understanding difference between
flooding (flood insurance) / storm surge (evacuation) Resilience Florida
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 274/291
Education and Communication Issues (continued)
Topic Theme State
Public needs to understand ramifications to land use violations for
rebuilding Stewardship Louisiana
Protection
of
shipwrecks
and
relic
sites
that
are
not
protected
‐Educate that these are non‐renewable Stewardship Louisiana
Educate public on our own resources and their importance to the
economy Stewardship Mississippi
Educate public on value of data collection and uses Climate Texas
Educate public on value of monitoring programs Human Texas
Education and Communication Target Groups
Topic Theme State
Education of scientists about technology available Stewardship Alabama
Partnerships with policy makers to provide information,
communication to user groups (funding to develop products) Operations Florida
Key underpinning issues that need to communicate to decision‐
makers Ecosystem Alabama
Government awareness/acknowledgement of importance of
freshwater inflow (need for freshwater inflow to coastal area)
‐Issue even when isnʹt a drought
Ecosystem Alabama
Teacher workshops for inland teachers to share coastal/marine
information Ecosystem Mississippi
Develop educational materials/workshops for formal and informal
educators Climate
Florida
Briefing materials for communicators & environmental journalists Climate Florida
Design educational materials programs for cross‐cultural groups Human Alabama
Developing education for post‐marketing processors / shipper /
retailers Human Alabama
Development of a naturalist program Stewardship Alabama
Develop awareness about technology available
‐Specific interface to direct Stewardship Alabama
University presidentʹs forums (land use and zoning) Stewardship Louisiana
Maps & education for tourists and out‐of‐area visitors Operations Florida
Educating inland resident about health hazard at coast Human Louisiana
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 275/291
Additional Education and Communication Topics and Educational Research
Topic Theme State
Science interpretation to close gap between education and science Stewardship Texas
Communicating results of research Stewardship Alabama
Branding of ʺStewardshipʺ message Stewardship Alabama
Marine mammals are a good way to involve and interest the
public Ecosystem Mississippi
Avoid consumer misconception‐conception Human Louisiana
Is there a link between investment in education and community
resilience? Resilience Mississippi
Research into how formal and informal communication come into
play and which works better and when Resilience Mississippi
Effectiveness of education and outreach Stewardship Florida
Educate human reference points Stewardship Florida
Education Resilience Mississippi
Education
(re:
Gulf
of
Mexico
as
large
system,
connections)
Ecosystem
Texas
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 276/291
Information Needs
Data Topics
Topic Theme State
Temporal/spatial
gaps
in
data
>
hard
to
fill
in
gaps—need
to
coordinate monitoring and data management across diverse
topics to get ecosystem approach (e.g., expand SEAMAP
surveys)
Ecosystem Texas
Identify data sources ‐ archived, real‐time, and other Climate Florida
Need a better understanding of data (available / accessible) and
how to get it Resilience Texas
Expand collection baseline data ‐ OOS Ecosystem Louisiana
Pool evaluation data Climate Louisiana
Access to existing data ‐‐ ex: fisheries, all sorts of data Stewardship Texas
Data mining from individual researchers Stewardship Texas
Continuous data Climate Louisiana
Centralized database for existing data & models
‐Inventory of existing data (e.g. fishing licenses, alligator catch
data, to bldg permits)
Ecosystem Louisiana
Gather and synthesize existing data from state / federal /
university sources
‐Lots of existing research
‐Need clearinghouse (GOMA Habitat Identification team is
working on this for habitat)
Ecosystem Florida
Centralized shoreline / topography data location to facilitate
research Resilience Alabama
Website portal for available technology Stewardship Alabama
Need standards, metadata process to help organize & manage
data (e.g. NASA working on ʺCOASTʺ (coastal online
assessment & synthesis tool) intended to facilitate
harmonization of data, synthesis)
Ecosystem Louisiana
Standardize data measurements (establish standards) Climate Texas
Standards and protocols for data management Human Alabama
Data consistencies from ocean to land Climate Louisiana
Develop comprehensive database in real time (IOOS) and
integrate existing HAB information Human Florida
Vibrio baseline data Human Mississippi Database of technical and human resources available to support
field research Stewardship Texas
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 277/291
Data Topics (continued)
Topic Theme State
Get post Katrina baseline data then follow with regular data
collection Resilience Louisiana
Tie tidal datums together across Gulf Resilience Mississippi
Need more coastal and subsurface geological data Climate Louisiana
Historical baselines for comparison to climate change
‐Identify, enhance, and support
‐Current baseline data
‐Gathering for comparisons
Climate Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 278/291
Monitoring Topics
Topic Theme State
Need monitoring information so that we can educate
communities on the effect of management changes Stewardship Louisiana
Experiments set up but we are not monitoring ‐ right people and
right parameters Stewardship Louisiana
On the ground data collection / monitoring needs to be increased;
also need to coordinate Ecosystem Texas
Increased instrumentation and coordination of oceanographic
data and real time access Stewardship Texas
Low cost, real‐time observation systems Operations Alabama
Monitoring data ‐ Gulf wide database Ecosystem Louisiana
More sensors in Gulf of Mexico Climate Louisiana
High accuracy reference network Resilience Alabama
Accurate near‐shore wave data Resilience Alabama
Need observing systems ‐ presence, abundance, location &
environmental conditions, and baseline oceanographic info Human Mississippi
Need for marine information systems in inland waters (AIS) Operations Mississippi
Add gauging stations in tidal plains to monitor water quality and
quantity Resilience Texas
Water quality and nutrient run‐off
‐Need synthesis of monitoring information Ecosystem Florida
Encourage application of source tracking technology in Gulf of
Mexico Human Mississippi
Monitoring of coastal hypoxia—need regional assessment to
understand magnitude
of
problem
Ecosystem Mississippi
Need to monitor parameters (i.e. oyster monitoring only 2
parameters) Stewardship Louisiana
More monitoring programs
‐Health issues
‐Elevation
Human Texas
Increase monitoring and data collection (sea‐level rise, surface
elevation tables) long term monitoring Climate Texas
Long term coastal change detection Operations Alabama
Have tidal datums in Gulf detected a rise in sea levels? If so,
why? Resilience Mississippi
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 279/291
Mapping Topics
Topic Theme State
Large scale mapping efforts Stewardship Florida
Accurate topography Climate Alabama
Expand elevation data knowledge ‐ more frequent surveys and
more density Climate Louisiana
Florida‐ DEM‐ Redelineate SLOSH Resilience Florida
More LIDAR, more often Resilience Texas
Higher and higher resolution bathymetry / LIDAR (better data) Climate Louisiana
Support:
1) Radar, bathymetry ‐ fill gaps
‐Increase range ‐ landward; develop means to measure
seaward
‐Satellites going offline ‐ more gaps in ability to monitor
on large scale (e.g., location of loop current)
2) More refined scale ‐ spatial and temporal to make cross‐
connections
‐DM (Database management) protocol/central distribution
DMAC (Database Management Analysis Center)
Climate Florida
High‐resolution comprehensive geophysical, habitat, bathy
mapping continental shelf Resilience Texas
Better bathymetric data for region Ecosystem Louisiana
See Steve Junes for bathy data Resilience Alabama
Florida Bathy Resilience Florida
High resolution maps of shelf and slope exist for TX and LA, and
these need to be extended around the Gulf. Requires
multibeam.
Good educational
tools
as
well.
Ecosystem Florida
Expand bi‐annual shoreline data orthophotography collection to
include Mississippi Sound and wetlands shoreline Resilience Alabama
Info GIS‐ based geodatabase of various discipline data Resilience Texas
GIS navigational layer identifying navigational rules, distribution
and changes (10 speed zone) Operations Florida
Inventory of marine establishments/services/operations in the
Gulf of Mexico (GIS)
‐Aquaculture/seafood/fisheries
‐Transport/shipping
‐Recreational
‐Government operations ‐Economic impact
‐Water/non‐water dependent
Operations Mississippi
Inventory of coastal infrastructure Stewardship Louisiana
Map available safe harbors Operations Alabama
Identify safe harbors, how many exist, and how many are needed Operations Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 280/291
Mapping Topics (continued)
Topic Theme State
Mapping of physical and biological habitats with 21st century
technology Stewardship Texas
Inventory of natural resources Stewardship Alabama
Environmental inventory (species & habitat) Operations Florida
Habitat maps for the region‐terrestrial / aquatic / marine
‐Hydrodynamic models ‐ sub‐regional levels
‐Local subsidence rates across region
‐Enhance information networks
Climate Mississippi
Mapping & benthic habitat needed Operations Florida
Map oyster reefs throughout Gulf of Mexico Stewardship Florida
Regional coordination of sea grass mapping / EFH mapping Ecosystem Mississippi
Basic information on Florida west shelf benthic communities,
whatʹs out there ‐‐ natural ledge communities Ecosystem
Florida
Information on availability of sediments ‐ where & when Ecosystem Louisiana
Have sand resources pre‐identified Resilience Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 281/291
Modeling Topics
Topic Theme State
Forecasts required ‐ drives, instrument demands Climate Florida
Results of predictive models and level of success Operations Florida
Long‐term data modeling Resilience Texas
Modeling the environment Stewardship Louisiana
Need 3‐D patterns of currents in GOM Climate Texas
Estuary, coast, offshore linkages; modeling the linkages Ecosystem Florida
Accurate subsidence Climate Alabama
Effects of climate change on coastal restoration and coastal
development Climate Louisiana
What is current situation?
‐What would change with sea‐level change and higher
temperatures?
Human Florida
Measure interaction between sea surface temperature (SST) and
ecology Resilience
Texas
Predictive models of hurricane strike & surge Operations Alabama
Develop model of what a successful resilient community is Resilience Mississippi
Risk assessment Climate Texas
Hypoxia prediction Climate Louisiana
Models to look at human‐use trends and effects on ecosystems
data gap analysis to couple existing models Stewardship Texas
Forecast and develop solutions to environmental impacts of
increasing human population density along the Gulf Coast Stewardship Texas
Model (not pure economic) to assist business decisions Operations Alabama
Modeling shipping
channels
Operations
Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 282/291
Coordination, Policy, Regulation, and Management Needs
Coordination and Cooperation Topics
Topic Theme State
Identify research funding sources Climate Florida
Begin with inventory of existing research (before can truly know
what research priorities are) Ecosystem Mississippi
Better coordination across all things going on in the GOM;
coordination of research and management efforts Ecosystem Florida
Encourage multi‐disciplinary research & approaches Human Mississippi
Engage other agencies Climate Louisiana
Heavy participation by Army Corps of Engineers Climate Louisiana
Need to get the US Coast Guard engaged with research and
navigation and water safety information Operations Florida
Engagement of local, state, regional governance (on climate
change (multi‐disciplinary) ‐How to use this information to mitigate?
Climate Louisiana
Increase interaction among governments at all levels and include
landowners Stewardship Louisiana
Need better coordination of management operations Stewardship Mississippi
Include Cuba and Mexico in Gulf of Mexico ecosystem work Ecosystem Mississippi
Lots of basic information needs in Mexico (e.g., oceanographer,
fish assessment, habitats)
‐Apply new technologies (i.e. sidescan sonar) Ecosystem Texas
Regional (Gulf of Mexico) strategic maritime business plan Operations Mississippi
Information directory
Stewardship Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 283/291
Policy, Regulation and Legislation Topics
Topic Theme State
Utilize information in policy making Operations Alabama
Policy scenarios for decision‐makers and coastal stake‐holders Climate Florida
National policies on flood insurance
‐Should we rebuild here?
‐Draft policy on climate change & how to mitigate
Climate Louisiana
Federal flood insurance policies need updated Climate Texas
Insurance ‐government policies
‐Enabling risk Resilience Mississippi
Sound policy of local community with climate change Climate Texas
Identify and define legal pathways for reliable emergency
marine services center use Operations Louisiana
Evaluate evacuation policies and emergency operating plans Resilience Alabama
Improve land use planning, floodplain management,
development of high risk areas Resilience Alabama
Mandates for following the plans that exist
‐Requirements for following the plan Resilience Florida
Which approach—education, regulation, incentives—is more
effective in increasing resiliency? Resilience Mississippi
Smart growth Ecosystem Florida
State and local incentives to developers to build better mandates Resilience Mississippi
Incentives for leaving open land Ecosystem Florida
What to do with private property? Climate Louisiana
Better beach and dune protection policies Resilience Texas
Open ocean aquaculture ‐‐ need policies (GOM Fisheries
Management Council working on an amendment about this
currently; National policy is currently stalled.)
Ecosystem Florida
Need better ʺregimeʺ on ocean ʺuseʺ
Re: aquaculture, shellfish Operations Louisiana
Policy
Re: permitting for offshore aquaculture
‐need a way to permit this…
‐ʺoffbottomʺ aquaculture too
Operations Louisiana
Ports Facilities‐‐standards for design Resilience Florida
Create more marine reserves and long‐term research sites Stewardship Louisiana
Impact of managing fisheries Stewardship Florida
Policy on imported seafood quality Human Florida
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 284/291
Regulation, Policy, and Legislation Topics (continued)
Topic Theme State
Conflict resolution between research vs. policy, i.e. MS River
management Stewardship Mississippi
Phosphate mining policy / standards potential for cathosplumes Resilience Florida
Investigate access to Florida sand Resilience Alabama
Legal protection for cultural sites beyond state waters Stewardship Louisiana
What regulation changes will have to be made as coastal
communities shift to seawater for drinking water? Human Florida
Improve federal matching funding for rural and urban sewage
treatment and non‐point source pollution Human Louisiana
Consistent management of septic systems Human Florida
Are marine discharge policies being enforced and are they
helping or improving environmental conditions? Operations Florida
Cash reward for recycling (instead of throwing overboard) Ecosystem Mississippi
Hard to enforce marine litter/debris laws Ecosystem Mississippi
Management Topics
Topic Theme State
Synthesize and translate information for use by management
community Ecosystem Florida
Translate research into actions Operations Alabama
Management needs biological, oceanographic, and
socioeconomic assessment
of
Gulf
of
Mexico
as
system
applied
to improve management/address management issues Ecosystem
Texas
Need comprehensive (adaptable / consistent / comparable) study
plans to respond to a variety of commercial activities in various
environments Operations Florida
Regional dredging plan Operations Alabama
Incorporation of newly developed field deployable testing into
management Human Alabama
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 285/291
Socioeconomic Needs
Socioeconomic Topics
Please see additional GMRP reports that highlight research topics identified at the five workshops since
there were many socioeconomic topics presented as research topics. Only the topics that were classified as
“non‐research” by the breakout groups are presented below.
Topic Theme State
Grad student mandate ‐ social sciences Climate Florida
Analysis of:
‐Users / stakeholders / MPA public forums Climate Florida
Need a better understanding about stakeholders in marine
operations (IOOS: GCOOS; etc.) Operations Louisiana
Large group behaviors/interactions‐‐social trap of large groups in
response to various issues Stewardship Louisiana
Human uses
(maritime
environmental)
Operations
Florida
Preservation of working waterfronts and commercial and
recreational destination Operations Florida
How do demographics of community affect how the community
responds? Resilience Mississippi
Assess populations to assess sustainability Stewardship Louisiana
Additional survey/testing of cultural resources Stewardship Louisiana
Economic research into costs of hardening infrastructure versus
continuing with existing and rebuilding after Resilience Mississippi
How does the insurance situation (commercial vs. government
policies) affect resilience of community? Resilience Mississippi
Resiliency index Resilience Mississippi
Description of the linkage between the value of functional
ecosystems and human‐use value Stewardship Texas
Standardization of economic value of a specific object or animal
(value of barrier island or manatee) Operations Florida
Economic information about ecosystem services Stewardship Florida
How to address loss of revenue related to outdoor license
activities? Stewardship Alabama
Economic value cost Stewardship Florida
Values of socioeconomic positions Stewardship Florida
Gulf of Mexico (GMFMC) does not have good info on
socioeconomic (fishing community) Operations Louisiana
Cost versus benefit of fishing gear modifications Stewardship Florida
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 286/291
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 287/291
Ecological and Biological Topics
Topic Theme State
Biodiversity of phytoplankton / microalgae (too much emphasis
on harmful algal blooms ‐‐ need to look at all species)
Need repository collections
Ecosystem Florida
Identify manuals on toxic microalgae and digital library Human Alabama
Generate baseline for many microorganisms Human Mississippi
Animal movement patterns Ecosystem Texas
Better data on marine species migration patterns
‐How to better utilize riverine discharge
‐Approach all research with a long‐term appreciation
‐ what is the underlying natural foundation
‐Research needs to account for major changes in the future
rather than assume present
Stewardship Mississippi
Where are we catching fish
‐How are they moving to respond to hypoxia Stewardship Louisiana
Information on species diversity to inform an ecosystem
approach especially the non‐charismatic species (phytoplankton
worms) Ecosystem Texas
Ecosystem based management of endangered species Stewardship Texas
Re‐introduce lost species: bear, wolves, manatees, birds Stewardship Louisiana
Prevention of invasives and remediation Ecosystem Texas
Are there bioproducts to enhance human health that are being
lost due to ecosystem degradation? Human Florida
Develop list of pharmaceuticals that have been identified in fish /
others Human Florida
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 288/291
Other Topics
Topic Theme State
Establish offshore aquaculture where it will have least impact Ecosystem Texas
Information needs re: open ocean aquaculture Ecosystem Florida
Select species for offshore aquaculture that will minimize impacts Ecosystem Texas
Lack of species selection info for land‐ based and offshore
aquaculture Operations Louisiana
What is the acceptable balance between harvest of marine life for
human health and protection of the resource? Human Florida
Develop list of seafood processing methods and imports Human Florida
Deep sea harvesting technology Human Mississippi
Better tonnage reporting mechanism Operations Alabama
White paper definitions of ʺworking waterfrontsʺ across US Operations Alabama
Quality of ʺsafe harborsʺ (harbors of refuge) for foul weather
protection Operations Louisiana
Compile recovery knowledge ‐ lessons learned Resilience Louisiana
Understand that coastal systems are dynamic Stewardship Mississippi
How do freshwater inflows meet needs of users and ecosystems Stewardship Texas
Big Bend of Florida ‐ need to know more Stewardship Florida
GMRP Appendix G
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 289/291
Gulf of Mexico Research Plan
Appendix H:
Constituent Comments
Submitted
via
E
This project was partially funded by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant NA06OAR4170078 and the
Florida Sea Grant College Program, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program, Mississippi‐Alabama Sea Grant
Consortium, and Texas Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views
of those organizations.
8/8/2019 GMRP Supplemental and Appendices
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gmrp-supplemental-and-appendices 290/291
There were several cases where individuals expressed interest in participating in one of the Gulf of
Mexico Research Planning workshops but were unable to attend. Some of these individuals provided
their research priorities via email. Their input is presented below however information that revealed
their identity was removed. This document contains the raw comments from Gulf of Mexico
constituents. They remain in this raw form so that meanings are not unintentionally changed. Please
keep this in mind when reading this document.
Commenter 1:
Hi Steve:
I do not believe I will be able to attend the Sea Grant Gulf of Mexico Regional Research Plan workshop;
however, I would like suggest that funding opportunities be made available for targeted research on the
prevention of marine and marine estuary macrofouling utilizing strategies aimed at minimizing
environmental impact. Macrofouling is not only an issue affecting marine riggings, platforms and vessel
hulls, but also impacts the condition of oyster crops as some species of mussels, for example, also foul
oyster beds. Current effective strategies utilizing organometallics, such as tributyl tin, will be banned in
the USA in 2008, because they are toxic to both target and non‐target organisms and they bioaccumulate.
Similar issues
are
being
raised
with
copper
and
other
heavy
metals
and
few
stand alone alternatives are in
the pipeline. Thus, there is a timely and important need for research opportunities to develop cleaner
technology antifouling strategies. Thank you for your consideration.
Commenter 2:
Thank you Steve:
I really appreciate your information and encouragement. This is something we need to work together
on. I am particularly interested in the applications aspects (e.g. RP4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 20) and could add
some specifics in several of these areas.
Coastal engineering,
in
particular,
applying
engineering
principles
to
enhance
availability
of
natural
resources, reduce the effects of major storms or other environmental changes; minimize the impact of
industrial/shipping activities; and enhance or restore/rehabilitate native ecosystems would be major
focus areas. We are currently involved in a $2M CWWPRA demonstration project, slated to begin in the
spring, deploying novel artificial reefs primarily for oyster and related species in S. Louisiana, but
applicable across much of the gulf coast.
I am also currently on sabbatical in Mexico and am investigating the role of mangroves in reducing or
mitigating storm effects, runoff impacts and other issues, and in particular contemplating the use of
mangroves as parts of near‐shore and coastal/barrier island/peninsular erosion reduction mechanisms.
A third area of interest is use of plants (coastal or interior) to minimize nitrogen impacts in coastal waters
(just finished an EPA 319 project on water quality runoff from sugarcane, and am interested in water
quality in interior waters that feed into coastal and estuarine areas).
Recommended