25
All Aboard the All Aboard the Standards Express! Standards Express! Marion Brady Marion Brady Note: Frame animation is complete when the blue arrow appears. Left- click the mouse (point anywhere) to advance to the next frame. Education Reform

Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is a critique of education standards by Prof. Marion Brady. I have his permission to share his presentation of why current ways and means of standardizing education actually diminish educational achievement.

Citation preview

Page 1: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

All Aboard the Standards All Aboard the Standards Express!Express!

Marion BradyMarion Brady

Note: Frame animation is complete when the blue arrow appears. Left-click the mouse (point anywhere) to advance to the next frame.

Education Reform

Page 2: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

22

Most people assume that content should be standardized.

Long before there were state standards for school subjects, content was so standardized the same textbooks and corporately-produced tests could be sold nationwide.

“Content” is education-speak for “what’s taught.”

Page 3: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

33

For reasons not clear, the business leaders, politicians, and wealthy philanthropists now running the education show aren’t satisfied with the old level of standardization. They want every kid in America to study exactly the same content.

Page 4: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

44

That extreme degree of standardization creates serious problems.

To that end, they’re pressuring states to adopt “national standards.”

Page 5: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

55

First problem:First problem:

We’re in an information explosion.

There’s only time to teach, maybe, about 0.00000001% of all there is to know.

Who’s qualified to say what that 0.00000001% should be?

Page 6: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

66

Second Problem:Second Problem:

Every kid is different—…has different interests, abilities, potential, experience, assets, liabilities, needs.

Forcing standard content on un-standardized, un-standardizable kids wastes intellectual potential and learner enthusiasm. Can America afford this loss?

Page 7: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

77

201120122015202020302060 …a future unlike the present and the past.

Third Problem:Third Problem:

The young will do their living in the future,…

Who knows which content they’ll need in order to survive in that future?

2013

Page 8: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

88

These three problems are being ignored. Standards and tests are being cranked out for the content of school subjects as if—

•Knowledge is static,

•Kids identical,

•The future predictable.2060

Page 9: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

99

Because today’s solutions won’t solve tomorrow’s problems, the young will need content that’s not in any textbook (or anywhere else).

They’ll have to generate it themselves.

Big mistake. Very big mistake.

Page 10: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1010

create,

innovate,

imagine alternatives.

Your children’s and grandchildren’s survival will depend on their ability to

Page 11: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1111

Creating new knowledge (content) is a basic skill, and traditional schooling isn’t developing it.

Inescapable, hard conclusion: The young aren’t being equipped to survive.

Page 12: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1212

To create new content, learners must examine, explore, inspect, investigate…

…real-world experience.

Page 13: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1313

…real world experience, e.g.:

What waste does this school generate?

Where does it go?

Where will it be when you’re 60 years old?

Page 14: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1414

…real world experience, e.g.:

Make a map that shows (or describe in words) the main ways your neighbor-hood has changed in the last 50 years.

What changes are likely in the next 20 years? Will your neighborhood be better or worse? Why? (Defend your conclusion.)

Explain why the changes happened.

Page 15: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1515

…real world experience, e.g.:

Figure out how much it costs to get everyone to your school on an average day.

Page 16: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1616

To deal with content-creating tasks, kids have to do more that just remember something taught.

They have to THINK FOR THEMSELVES – infer, hypothesize, generalize, relate, synthesize, make value judgments, and so on.

Page 17: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1717

Think for themselves? That creates a problem.

The present “standards and accountability” education reform effort is “data-driven.” The data comes from standardized test scores.

But nobody knows how to write standardized, machine-scored test questions that measure the quality of original content!

Page 18: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1818

Think about that.

To keep their jobs, teachers have to teach to tests of EXISTING content.

How likely, then, are they to assign work that requires learners to create NEW content?

Page 19: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

1919

Given the money and power of the fans of the “standards and accountability” fad, the reform train they’ve set in motion is too big, has gone too far, and is moving too fast, to derail.

Page 20: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2020

But if America is to reach the 22nd century in anything like recognizable form, that train isn’t going where America must go.

Page 21: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2121

We ignore those problems…

Exploding information

Individual differences

Unknown future

…at our peril.

Page 22: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2222

For those curious about tools to stimulate original, content-creating thought, we have an instructional program: Connections: Investigating Reality.

It’s designed primarily for adolescents and older learners.

Its free.

Page 23: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2323

Because Connections’ main instructional resource is the first-hand experience of those who use it,…

• conceptual concreteness,

• relevance,

• intrinsic motivation, and

• complex thought

…are inherent.

Page 24: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2424

Connections: Investigating Reality is just a start – a rough draft of a “comprehensive scope and sequence” (education-speak for what to teach, in what order). For this reason, it’s accompanied by a tool allowing users to communicate and collaborate to improve it continuously.

Page 25: Standards Express: A Critique of National Education Standards

2525

Below is a link to the course. It’s ready to use, and, if necessary, can be worked into present schooling without making bureaucratic waves.

Again: It’s free.*www.marionbrady.com

(See link to Connections: Investigating Reality on the homepage.)

*To individual educators and teaching teams for use with their classes. Publication rights limited. Copyright © 2007, 2009 by Howard Brady and Marion Brady.