Upload
ian-miles
View
1.244
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
a 2002 look at use of scenarios in Foresight programmes
Citation preview
Scenarios, Scenarios, Foresight, Foresight, Knowledge Knowledge PlatformsPlatforms
[email protected]@man.ac.uk
Scenarios, Foresight, Scenarios, Foresight, Knowledge PlatformsKnowledge Platforms
[email protected]@man.ac.uk
Based on two projects, mainly and Based on two projects, mainly and on three presentations:on three presentations:
1 process and results of genomics 1 process and results of genomics exerciseexercise
2 some lessons from this (as 2 some lessons from this (as cnveyed to sponsor)cnveyed to sponsor)
3 Success scenario approach 3 Success scenario approach applied to nanotechnologyapplied to nanotechnology
Part 1 “Genomics”Part 1 “Genomics” Workshop and preparatory material Workshop and preparatory material
commissioned by Research Council to commissioned by Research Council to aid selection decisions (funding aid selection decisions (funding decisions already taken - but see later)decisions already taken - but see later)
Client wanted “traditional” scenario Client wanted “traditional” scenario workshop - focusing on change in S&T workshop - focusing on change in S&T impacting on Soc sci - not on impacting on Soc sci - not on alternatives for soc sci as suchalternatives for soc sci as such
ESRC Genomics ScenariosESRC Genomics Scenarios- material from evaluation - material from evaluation
session with sponsor session with sponsor Clem BezoldClem Bezold
Institute for Alternative FuturesInstitute for Alternative Futures
Ian MilesIan MilesCentre for Research and InnovationCentre for Research and Innovation
Project OverviewProject Overview Input for Forecasts and Scenarios:Input for Forecasts and Scenarios:
• Dec. Design Meeting Dec. Design Meeting • IAF/CRIC Research (-> series of documents)IAF/CRIC Research (-> series of documents)• Interviews with 22 Experts (activists, social scientists, Interviews with 22 Experts (activists, social scientists,
scientific researchers, business professionals)scientific researchers, business professionals)
Convened January 2002 Workshop.Convened January 2002 Workshop.• Used three different “lenses” to help clarify the role of Used three different “lenses” to help clarify the role of
Social Science Research for Genomics Social Science Research for Genomics • COUNCIL group collaboration software COUNCIL group collaboration software • 24 Participants24 Participants
Key Drivers
for Genomics
Thematic
Priorities
Genomics
Applications
ScenariosPriorities for
Social
Science
4 reports prepared - fed into workshop - 4 reports prepared - fed into workshop - result was new reports and workshop report plus result was new reports and workshop report plus
LEARNING, NETWORKINGLEARNING, NETWORKING
Multiple Approaches for Multiple Approaches for Determining Priorities Determining Priorities
Design workshop -> report -> Design workshop -> report -> scenario workshop: scenario workshop:
Key Drivers of Genomics Key Drivers of Genomics1. Functionality of Genomics2. Regulation of Genomics
3. Business Forces and Beyond4. Genomics Itself
5. Politics and Geopolitics6. Demand
7. Social Attitudes8. Social Mobilization
9. Governance of Knowledge10.Events
11.Risk12.Environment
Thematic Priorities -> Themes forThematic Priorities -> Themes forSocial ScienceSocial Science
Specificities of Genomics • nature and impact of scientific activity
Science and Technology Knowledge• relationship between public and private science
Regulatory Issues• privacy and data protection
Social and Health Policy Challenges• insurability and health impacts
Interfaces Between Disciplines• effects on social and economic structures
Cultural Implications and Institutional Resources• social science in relation to natural sciences
Using Archetypal IAF Using Archetypal IAF ScenariosScenarios
4 Scenarios constructed out of variations of the Drivers:
• Genomics, Inc.
• Broken Promises
• Out of Our Control
• Genomics for All
First shot prepared before workshop, break-out groups elaborated
Social Science Research Social Science Research Priorities – How as well as WhatPriorities – How as well as What
Priorities related to Research Organizations and Process:1. Interdisciplinarity – outreach to natural
scientists2. Engaged Research – provide context for
innovation3. International Research – role of
developing world4. Conflict and Inequality – social division
and equity 5. Communication of Results – enhance
dialogue
What Social Science What Social Science Research Priorities – Research Priorities –
Priorities related to Genomics Research Issues for Social Science:1. Social Perceptions and Ethical Structures
2. Critical Analysis of Key Social Constucts
3. Business and Economics
4. International Politics and Institutions
5. Cultural Reception and Consumption Practices
6. Co-Evolution of Laws and Legal Structures
7. Food and Agricultural Applications
8. Mobilization of Groups
9. Inter-relations Between Technologies
10. Corporations, Innovation, Technology Transfer
11. Genomics Innovation and the State
Foresight and Foresight and Social Research Social Research
Priorities:Priorities:
Lessons from the Lessons from the
Genomics Scenarios ExerciseGenomics Scenarios Exercise
Types of LessonTypes of Lesson Results of the Exercise: publications and other Results of the Exercise: publications and other
outputs, specific recommendations and areas outputs, specific recommendations and areas of uncertainty or controversyof uncertainty or controversy
Lessons concerning prioritisation in genomics-Lessons concerning prioritisation in genomics-related research - related to the specific related research - related to the specific exercise, and to Foresight more generallyexercise, and to Foresight more generally
Lessons that might be applied to prioritisation Lessons that might be applied to prioritisation in (social) research more widelyin (social) research more widely
Some lessons related to the Some lessons related to the design and implementationdesign and implementation
Timing problems in terms of fit with Timing problems in terms of fit with ESRC genomics prioritisation and ESRC genomics prioritisation and selection processesselection processes
Evolution of client demands and Evolution of client demands and motivationsmotivations
Scope for closer client involvement Scope for closer client involvement in process design (design workshop in process design (design workshop issues)issues)
Some lessons related to Some lessons related to the workshop processthe workshop process
Problematic involvement of Problematic involvement of competing would-be centrescompeting would-be centres
Too few natural scientists and Too few natural scientists and industry representatives (conflict of industry representatives (conflict of dates, etc)dates, etc)
Scope for more scripted sessions?Scope for more scripted sessions?
Some lessons related to Some lessons related to the methodsthe methods
Valuable use of technological aids - Valuable use of technological aids - need for UK capabilities here?need for UK capabilities here?
Scenario methodology - need for Scenario methodology - need for development of social science development of social science analysis and exploitation of various analysis and exploitation of various methods (what linkage to existing methods (what linkage to existing professionals?)professionals?)
Impacts (just some…)Impacts (just some…)
Changed structural ideas for funding as well Changed structural ideas for funding as well as election inputsas election inputs
generated internal unease about soc sci generated internal unease about soc sci capabilities, (staff learning)capabilities, (staff learning)
led then to decision to spread funding, to add led then to decision to spread funding, to add plans for new interdisciplinary facilities, to plans for new interdisciplinary facilities, to support use of scenario methods for support use of scenario methods for communicationcommunication
Internal communication about issue, thus Internal communication about issue, thus ongoing supportongoing support
Part 2 Success Part 2 Success Scenarios:Scenarios:The example of a The example of a
nanotechnology nanotechnology scenario workshop - scenario workshop -
material used in material used in workshop (excerpts)workshop (excerpts)
Success for the UKSuccess for the UK in Nanotechnology in Nanotechnology
Applications by 2006Applications by 2006
CRICSuccess in Nanotechnologies
Why this Workshop?Why this Workshop? The Wave of Interest in NanotechnologyThe Wave of Interest in Nanotechnology Where does the UK stand?Where does the UK stand? What should the UK do?What should the UK do? What would constitute ‘Success’?What would constitute ‘Success’? What are the Drivers and Shapers of, - What are the Drivers and Shapers of, -
and Barriers to - Change?and Barriers to - Change? How could we get to Success? What How could we get to Success? What
would it look like?would it look like?
Success ScenariosSuccess Scenarios WHAT?WHAT?
Credible, optimisticCredible, optimistic Expert consensus if possibleExpert consensus if possible Informed by benchmarking and other inputsInformed by benchmarking and other inputs
WHY?WHY? ““Stretch target”Stretch target”
Shared visions, improved understandingShared visions, improved understanding Better indicators of progressBetter indicators of progress
Action pointsAction points
Previous Previous WorkshopsWorkshops
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
IN THE UK
A SCENARIO FOR SUCCESS IN 2005
Commissioned by: Dr. John Taylor, Director-General of the Research
CouncilsOffice of Science and Technology
Department of Trade and Industry
Funded by: The Economic and Social Research Council
Conducted by: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC),
University of Manchester and UMIST
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
IN THE UK
A SCENARIO FOR SUCCESS IN 2005
Commissioned by: Dr. John Taylor, Director-General of the Research
CouncilsOffice of Science and Technology
Department of Trade and Industry
Funded by: The Economic and Social Research Council
Conducted by: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC),
University of Manchester and UMIST
Contents Executive Summary
1. Introduction 1.1 What would ‘success’ look like by 2005?
1.2 Developing the Scenario 1.3 The Workshop Participants
2. The 2005 Scenario and its Rationale
2.1 Technological Change by 2005 2.2 Entrepreneurship, New Business Models and Venture Capital
2.3 Content 2.4 Innovative Business Use of ICTs ...
2.5 Skilled Workers and Innovative Consumers 2.6 Importance of the Science Base
2.7 Government Action 2.7.1 Government as an Innovative... and User of ICTs
2.7.2 Government Providing the Framework for Competition 2.7.3 Government Encouraging Entrepreneurship
2.8 Indicators of Success for the UK in ICTs by 2005
3. The Economic Dimensions of the Scenario
3.1 The Distinction between Production and Diffusion 3.2 How the Contribution of ICT Production to the Economy is Measured
3.3 Estimates of the Contribution Made to the Economy by ICT Production
3.3.1 Value Added 3.3.2 Employment
3.3.3 Trade and the Balance of Payments 3.4 How the Contribution of ICT Diffusion to the Economy is Measured
3.5 Estimates of the Contribution Made to the Economy by ICT Diffusion 3.5.1 Improvements to Industry Performance
3.5.2 Lower Prices and Higher Quality Goods and Services for UK Households
4. Conclusions
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE UK
A SCENARIO FOR SUCCESS IN 2005
Commissioned by: Dr. John Taylor, Director-General of the Research
CouncilsOffice of Science and Technology
Department of Trade and Industry
Funded by: The Economic and Social Research Council
Conducted by: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC),
University of Manchester and UMIST
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE UK
A SCENARIO FOR SUCCESS IN 2005
Commissioned by: Dr. John Taylor, Director-General of the Research
CouncilsOffice of Science and Technology
Department of Trade and Industry
Funded by: The Economic and Social Research Council
Conducted by: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC),
University of Manchester and UMIST
6 Application Areas6 Application AreasInformaticsInformatics Drug Delivery
SystemsDrug Delivery
Systems
Tissue Engineering,
medical implants &
devices
Tissue Engineering,
medical implants &
devices
Novel Materials
Novel Materials
Sensors and actuators
Sensors and actuators
Instrumentation, tooling and metrology
Instrumentation, tooling and metrology
NN
AreaKey applications /products benchmarked
2002 2004 2008 2010
Informatics
Continued improve-ments to CMOS ccts.
Single ElectronTransistors
Quantum Computing Ccts. & Algorithms
High frequency switching
Higher bandwidth, error-free comms
weakstrong
Key enabling technologies …developing
Bottom-up, self assembly, nano 3D structures
Entangled qubitsNanowires
Nanofabrication
Novel materials, gates and
interconnects
Informatics- Nano Benchmarking and Scenario Development Map
New and developing materials
Replacing Si Molecular electronics
high performance ASICsfor consumer
products, comms.,healthcare
Many apps enabled by•smaller size•faster processing•lower power
2006
Nanofabrication
Molecular scale
electronics
Novel embedded processor design
QuantumInformation
Processing apps.
Scenario development route described
““Snapshot” Example -Snapshot” Example - InformaticsInformatics
Confidential
The Workshop will:The Workshop will: Build on these starting points Build on these starting points
to develop improved success to develop improved success scenarios to tell us:scenarios to tell us:
What will drive change?What will drive change?
What will success look like?What will success look like?
What will enable us to get there?What will enable us to get there?
How will we know we are on track?How will we know we are on track?
What do we need to do to make it happen?What do we need to do to make it happen?
Success ScenariosSuccess Scenarios Starting from the benchmarking studies and Starting from the benchmarking studies and
“snapshots” for the 6 application areas:“snapshots” for the 6 application areas: Where does the UK stand?Where does the UK stand? What does a SUCCESS SCENARIO look like?What does a SUCCESS SCENARIO look like? What are the Drivers and Shapers of, - and What are the Drivers and Shapers of, - and
Barriers to - Change?Barriers to - Change? How could we get to Success? What actions How could we get to Success? What actions
are required?are required?
Working SessionsWorking Sessions
Issues to ConsiderIssues to ConsiderCurrent State of UKCurrent State of UK Major Issues Arising for the Near Major Issues Arising for the Near
FutureFuture Any Surprises?Any Surprises? MetricsMetrics for Success and Failure for Success and Failure
6 WORKING GROUPS, FEEDBACK INTO 6 WORKING GROUPS, FEEDBACK INTO PLENARIESPLENARIES
Drivers of ChangeDrivers of Change Access to technology: Access to technology:
New knowledge in the UK and internationallyNew knowledge in the UK and internationally
Local and global markets and competition:Local and global markets and competition: demand pull from users’ demand pull from users’ appreciation of opportunities from knowledgeappreciation of opportunities from knowledge
Other issues Other issues Special features that distinguish your area ?Special features that distinguish your area ? UK’s special advantages or problems compared UK’s special advantages or problems compared
to competitors?to competitors?
What would constitute ‘Success’?What would constitute ‘Success’? IndicatorsIndicators key products and applications key products and applications impact of products on end-user performanceimpact of products on end-user performance local and global end-user markets - size and UK sharelocal and global end-user markets - size and UK share industry structure - large firms, SMEs, spin-outsindustry structure - large firms, SMEs, spin-outs business model (e.g. high value added)business model (e.g. high value added) where are the UK companies in the supply chain?where are the UK companies in the supply chain? effect on GDP/employment? And impact on inward investment?effect on GDP/employment? And impact on inward investment? our competitors, and how we compareour competitors, and how we compare where is the leading-edge research? where UK stands?where is the leading-edge research? where UK stands? other features other features
How much change by 2006?How much change by 2006?
What Enables ChangeWhat Enables Change Quality of researchQuality of research Ownership of researchOwnership of research Availability of skilled people Availability of skilled people Sources of finance Sources of finance Instrumentation, standardsInstrumentation, standards Infrastructure and manufacturing capabilities (e.g. Infrastructure and manufacturing capabilities (e.g.
fabrication facilities)fabrication facilities) Structure and organisation of industry and markets Structure and organisation of industry and markets Regulatory Environment Regulatory Environment Policies for Health Services and other public sector Policies for Health Services and other public sector
marketsmarkets Intellectual Property RegimesIntellectual Property Regimes Other issues (please add your own)Other issues (please add your own)
How do we know we are How do we know we are beating the competition?beating the competition?
Relative performance with other countries: Relative performance with other countries: UK research recognised by global firms as leading edge UK research recognised by global firms as leading edge UK firms assembling high value added patent portfoliosUK firms assembling high value added patent portfolios Venture capitalists and inward investors investing in UK Venture capitalists and inward investors investing in UK
start-upsstart-ups International collaborationsInternational collaborations End users seeking/ recognising value of UK products End users seeking/ recognising value of UK products
(market share) (market share) Availability/size of facilities in the UKAvailability/size of facilities in the UK Number of graduates and post-graduates in relevant Number of graduates and post-graduates in relevant
disciplinesdisciplines Other issues (please add your own)Other issues (please add your own)
What do we do to make it What do we do to make it happen?happen?
SSteps which need to be taken to maximise the teps which need to be taken to maximise the likelihood of your success scenarioslikelihood of your success scenarios
ResearchResearch PeoplePeople FacilitiesFacilities Finance and taxationFinance and taxation Access to technology [and international Access to technology [and international
collaboration]collaboration] Regulatory issuesRegulatory issues Other issues]Other issues]
(End of workshop (End of workshop presentation)presentation)
- much produced on fly!- much produced on fly!
June June 2002 - 2002 -
the the “output” “output”
- but - but action action
alreadyalready
Foresight.gov.uk has Foresight.gov.uk has been “refocused”been “refocused”
But issues of long-tem challenges But issues of long-tem challenges do not go awaydo not go away
And need to source and combine And need to source and combine knowledge inputs from many and knowledge inputs from many and novel sources is intensifiednovel sources is intensified
Thus scenario techniques - OF MANY Thus scenario techniques - OF MANY KINDS (some more Foresight-like) - KINDS (some more Foresight-like) - are revitalised, in business as well are revitalised, in business as well as in state, and especially in RTD.as in state, and especially in RTD.
Real End of PresentationReal End of Presentation
Thanks!Thanks!
CRICSuccess in Nanotechnologies