A R C H I T E C T U R E P O R T F O L I OB r a n d o n N e w c o m e r
[ ARCHITEC TUREPORTFOLIO ]
BRANDONNE WCOMERMaster of Architec tureUnivers i t y of Michigan
a. 5698 Pebble D r ive Freder ick , MD 21703c. 240.626.6675e. b [email protected]
w w w.bnewcomer.com
curriculum vitae
atmospheric convention
spatial packing
responsive skin
urban hub
artistic kindergarten
exhibition pavilion
environode
4
6
2 0
3 4
4 0
5 4
6 0
6 8
4
Education
Professional Experience2011
Intern
2009Intern Architect
2007-2008
2003-2004
Intern
Intern
2009
2012
University of Michigan
Catholic University School of Architecture + Planning
Taubman College of Architecture + Ubran Planning
Montgomery College2007
Lehman-S mith McLeish
S teven J. K arr aia, Inc.
King, A sbur y & A ssociates
D imensions Design-Build
Master of Architec ture
Bachelor of S cience in Architec ture
A ssociate of Applied S cience in Architec ture
Entry-level architectural work including programming, design development, construction drawings, presentation drawings and site analysis for interior and core projects
Entry-level architectural work involving schematic design, construction drawings, pre-design analysis, redlines, and initial project management for institutional and commercial projects
Produced architectural research, site visits, and construction drawings for commercial projects
Entry-level architectural work including design development, construction drawings, redlines, 3d modeling, and initial project management for a commercial based project
[ CURRICULUMVITAE ]
5
Design/build of 400sf prefabricated sustainable living unit function “off the grid”
Academic Experience / Research
Montgomery CollegeTaught an advanced 3d computer modeling and architectural presentation course
University of MichiganSustainable Systems II: Assisted in preparing tests, giving lectures, and grading
2011
2010
2011
2008-2009 EnviroNODE
Adjunc t Fac ulty / Lec turer
Graduate S tudent Instruc tor
Net Zero Emissions Building DesignResearch + Design involving net zero emissions housing
2009
2009
2006
Academic Involvement
Awards / Recognitions
Comprehensive Building Design Studio Competition
Honor Society in Architecture - based on academic merit
University of Michigan - merit based scholarship $20,000
Co-Chair / Editor
Portfolio Workshop - Montgomery College
Catholic University + Montgomery College
Project Manager2008-2009
2008-2009
2010-2011
2009
2007-2010
A.S.I.D. Student Competition
C leland S cholarship + Architec ture Grant
Award of D istinc tion _ 2nd Place: (Re)thinking Transit
Tau S igma Delta Honor S ociety
AIAS Communic ations Committee
Invited S peaker / Lec turer
Invited Juror
AIAS Freedom By Design
Winning Entr y _ 1st Place: Emergenc y Relief Housing
6
Site42° 16’ N + 83° 44’ WAnn Arbor, Michigan
Proposed ClientAnn Arbor DDA
ProgramMixed Use Residential Tower
[ AT M O S P H E R I C C O N V E N T I O N ]
The Detroit Convention Center, known as the Cobo Center, exists as a formal and spatial exclusion from the city. The massive structure consumes multiple city blocks removing the user from any sense of their surroundings. However, the Cobo Center has an intricate relationship with the automo-tive industry in Detroit, an industry that provides economic support to the city and building alike. The failure of the automo-tive industry and its resulting evacuation of the city left behind a series of vacancies within the urban fabric. The cities economic decline and the collapse of industry leave the Cobo Center unoccupied and underused. As a standing reserve of unused space, the convention center holds similar atmospheric qualities to the other vacancies within the city. This thesis asserts atmospheric control as a means to renegotiate the boundary be-tween the Cobo Center and the city. Inherent
relationships are established between the spectacle of the auto show and atmospheric qualities used to showcase cars. The spec-tacle is made apparent through the varying control of atmospheres with distinctive re-lationships established between vacancies of the city fabric and the convention center, through atmospheric mappings. Further ex-amination of mediation takes place through the manipulation of enclosure on both inte-rior and exterior space allowing atmospheric qualities permeate the site, generating complex spatial relationships. Programmatic relationships are shaped by these conditions and form spatial intricacies through uncon-ventional means and atmospheric control. The programmatic shifts provide a mix of use and conditioning to allow for the continu-ous programming of the site. The boundary between building and city are blurred by the dispersion of the building’s enclosure and its
extension outward. Through these spatial suggestions the building becomes program-matically integrated to the urban fabric, while formally remaining an exception from the city through its perceived enclosure.
7
8
9
Geneva, Switzerland
Dubai, UAE
Tokyo, Japan
Frankfurt, GermanyParis, France
New York, NYChicago, IL
Las Vegas, NV
Los Angeles, CA
Detroit, MI
[control] naias worldwide as except ion
oakland county government
macomb county government
wayne county government
michigan state legislature
city of detroit
detroit metro convention & visitors bureau
DRCFA
SMG
[control] pol i t ical + governmental as except ion [control] convention as except ionNew Yorkpopulation_ 8.2 millionarea_ 302.6 sq. mi.density_ 27000 /sq. mi.
Grand Rapidspopulation_ 188,040area_ 44.4 sq. mi.density_ 4235.1/sq. mi.
regional venues of similar typologysized relative to sq footage & cobo center
footprint of building & block relative to square footage of building
St. Louis
Chicagoc.1960cost_ $35 million> 2,600,000 sf
c.1974cost_ $15 million500,000 sf
c.1974cost_ $82 million>1,000,000 sf
c.1968cost_ n/a750,000 sf
c.1981cost_ $373 million>1,500,000 sf
c.1922cost_ n/a>400,000 sf
c.1984cost_ n/a>600,000 sf
c.2003cost_ n/a260,000 sf
c.1987cost_ n/a<100,000 sf
c.1986cost_ n/a>700,000 sf
c.1993cost_ n/a>1,000,000 sf
c.1960cost_ $56 million2,400,000 sf
c.1977cost_ n/a>500,000 sf
Milwaukee
Toronto
Pittsburgh
Cincinnati
Indianapolis
New York
c.2005cost_ $850 million>2,100,000 sf
Boston
Philadelphia
c.2003cost_ n/a>2,300,000 sf
Washington, DC
Detroit
Detroitpopulation_ 713,700area_ 138.5 sq. mi.density_5,142/sq. mi.
Chicagopopulation_ 2.7 millionarea_ 227.6 sq. mi.density_ 11,843 /sq. mi.
Indianapolispopulation_ 820,445area_ 361 sq. mi.density_ 2,270 /sq. mi.
Milwaukeepopulation_ 594,833area_ 96.1 sq. mi.density_ 6189.7 /sq. mi.
St. Louispopulation_ 319,294area_ 61.9 sq. mi.density_ 5158.2 /sq. mi.
Toledopopulation_ 287,200area_ 80.7 sq. mi.density_ 3559 /sq. mi.
Torontopopulation_ 2.5 millionarea_ 243.2 sq. mi.density_ 10,287 /sq. mi.
Clevelandpopulation_ 396,815area_ 77.7 sq. mi.density_ 5107 /sq. mi.
Pittsburghpopulation_ 305,704area_ 55.4 sq. mi.density_ 5518.1 /sq. mi.
Columbuspopulation_ 787,033area_ 217.2 sq. mi.density_ 3623.5 /sq. mi.
Cincinnatipopulation_ 296,943area_ 77 sq. mi.density_ 3811.8 /sq. mi.
Bostonpopulation_ 617,594area_ 48.3 sq. mi.density_ 12786 /sq. mi.
Philadelphiapopulation_ 1.5 millionarea_ 134.1 sq. mi.density_ 11380 /sq. mi.
Washington, DCpopulation_ 601,720area_ 61 sq. mi.density_ 9864 /sq. mi.
ClevelandToledo
c.1993cost_ n/a1,700,000 sf
Columbus
Grand Rapids
10
1 1
12
atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I
longitudinal bui ld ing sec t ion
atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I I
13
atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I I I atmospher ic condit ions plan: level IV
14
15
t yp. condit ion I
t yp. condit ion I I
t yp. condit ion I I I
16
Office
Support
Support
Support
Banquet Hall
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Hotel
Hotel
Banquet Hall Support
Office
Office
Office
Hotel
Support
Management Performance Theater
Prefunction Services
Staging Area
Office
Support
Support
Support
Banquet Hall
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Hotel
Hotel
Banquet Hall Support
Office
Office
Office
Hotel
Support
Management Performance Theater
Prefunction Services
Staging Area
s i te strategy I - zone ident i f icat ion
Ground Level - P lan
s i te strategy I I - zone separat ion
Ground Level + I - P lan
1 7
Office
Support
Support
Support
Office
Office
Office
Management
NAIAS Office
Conference
Hotel
Services
Hotel
Office
Support
Banquet Hall
Support
SupportSupport
Support
Hotel
Performance Theater
mech + elec
storage
loading docks
mech + elec
mech + elec
storage
loading docks
Support
Office
Office
Support
Support
Support
Office
Staging Area
Support
Office
Office
Office
Hotel
Hotel
Prefunction Services
Support
Support
Banquet Hall
Management
NAIAS Office
Conference
Hotel
Services
Support
Support
Performance Theater
Banquet HallSupport
Support
Hotel
Hotel
Support
Support
Hotel
Hotel
Support
s i te strategy I I I - zone program distr ibut ion - ser v ices
Upper Level - P lan
site strategy IV - zone integrat ion
Upper Level +I - P lan
18
19
20
Site42° 16’ N + 83° 44’ WAnn Arbor, Michigan
Proposed ClientAnn Arbor DDA
ProgramMixed Use Residential Tower
[ S PAT I A L PA C K I N G ]
Spatial Packing was undertaken as a gradu-ate comprehensive studio focused on mid-rise, mixed use housing in downtown Ann Arbor. The requirements were to provide varying sizes of units for mixed income fami-lies. The design addresses multiple site con-ditions and the demands and requirements of downtown conditions. The site was split into two buildings. A smaller low rise build-ing faced the adjacent library and residential housing with live work studios on the ground floor as well as other public amenities. The roof slopes to respond to sun angles, ideal views, and the change in surrounding build-ing elevations. The corner was emphasized by a large community space that connects the corridors and lobby space. The second of the buildings is a taller mid-rise tower that seeks to be a landmark building and place of destination. The floors are broken up into a series of community nodes providing double
height community spaces which vary in func-tion every four stories. The tower responds to the surrounding context in a similar way as the lower bar building, with regards to sun angles, views, and neighboring context. Connecting the two buildings is an exterior courtyard that is the main public catalyst for the project. The courtyard connects the pub-lic from the adjoining bus transit center. The courtyard acts to support the influx of people with a array of transit oriented commercial and retail amenities. The facade pushes and pulls of the building creating a dynamic ar-ray of units and balconies while responding to local climate and energy conditions. It em-ploys a series of screens and glazed panels that add to its dynamic nature.
21
22
Ramp to Garage Level
144 Bicycle Spaces
78 Storage Spaces
Boutique Shop
15' CLTurning Radii
10 Parking Spaces4 ADA Parking Space
2950 SF Urban Life ShopBike Store
Weights
Water / Sewer / Telecommunications / Electrical Connections Room
Restaurant Patio
Womens
Telecom & ElecChase
Mens
Kitchen
1560 sf Bar/Restaurant
860 sf Retail/ Boutique
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
1200 Cafe
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Telecom & ElecChase
HVA
C a
nd F
ire
Sup
pres
sion
Pip
es
Fire System Panel
Mechanical Space
Boutique Retail Annex
Boutique Annex
Cafe Annex
Mec
hani
cal S
pace
Exit Ramp
20%
Telecommunications& Electrical
Tele
com
mun
icat
ions
& E
lect
rical
Mai
ntai
nenc
e S
tora
ge
Maintainence Storage
Entry Ramp 20%
160 Bicycle Spaces
Ramp to Garage Level
144 Bicycle Spaces
78 Storage Spaces
Boutique Shop
15' CLTurning Radii
10 Parking Spaces4 ADA Parking Space
2950 SF Urban Life ShopBike Store
Weights
Water / Sewer / Telecommunications / Electrical Connections Room
Restaurant Patio
Womens
Telecom & ElecChase
Mens
Kitchen
1560 sf Bar/Restaurant
860 sf Retail/ Boutique
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
1200 Cafe
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Live/Work First Floor
Telecom & ElecChase
HVA
C a
nd F
ire
Sup
pres
sion
Pip
es
Fire System Panel
Mechanical Space
Boutique Retail Annex
Boutique Annex
Cafe Annex
Mec
hani
cal S
pace
Exit Ramp
20%
Telecommunications& Electrical
Tele
com
mun
icat
ions
& E
lect
rical
Mai
ntai
nenc
e S
tora
ge
Maintainence Storage
Entry Ramp 20%
160 Bicycle Spaces
Ground Level Plan
Basement Plan
23
24
Massing Diagrams
25
26floor plans- levels 2-5 floor plans- levels 6-9
27floor plans- levels 10-13 floor plans- levels 14-17
28
29
30
Site Plan
31
34
35
[ Skin ]
Initial research lead to the development of a new building “skin” that responds and adapts to the exterior environment. The responsive factors based on site location and climate are humidity, temperature, percipitation, and wind. The skin will adapt to those exterior factors based on the perception of accept-able environmental quality. The adaptability to these factor results in a limitless number of possible facade conditions. The skin devel-opment also aims to respond to the presence of the interior user.
[ R E S P O N S I V E S K I N ]
Site38° 53’ N + 76° 59’ WHouston, TX
Proposed Client-
ProgramAdaptive Facade System
[ Focus ]
Building on the notion that indoor environ-mental quality is one of the most important aspects of design, the research engages cur-rent climate and atmospheric conditions at-tempting to manipulate or enhance how we perceive the indoor environment. Current building techniques are applied in a way that secludes us from experiencing these condi-tions while on the interior. The research and design strategies aim to develop a respon-sive system connecting the end-user with the exterior environment; a system that responds to and changes depending on exte-rior climate factors. The proposal speculates at the possibilities of harnessing climate conditions in a more productive means, go-ing beyond current applications for energy collection and generation.
36
37
40
41
and the rest of DC. The interior spaces gives way to the form creating the sense of the dy-namic movement present in the systems in-teracting with the building. It allows for the creating of both large open spaces and more enclosed intimate spaces. The design utilizes various sustainable strategies, specifically an operable louver systems, high-efficiency l.e.d. lighting, photovoltaics, integrated in-sulation, and sustainable m/e/p systems.
[ U R B A N H U B ]
Site38° 53’ N + 76° 59’ WWashington, DC
Proposed ClientDC Department of Transportation
ProgramTransit Oriented DevelopmentMixed Use
UbranHUB involves the design and develop-ment of a transit oriented, mixed use center located in the Capitol Hill district of Wash-ington, DC. The hub is to support multiple modes of public transportation and the new-ly proposed street car network. The design aims to solve several architectural issues in a rundown neighborhood with emphasis being placed on the connection of the surrounding neighborhoods and the design of a strong public integration. Formally the building represents the multiple modes of transpor-tation while also using structural concrete to allow for less interior columns. The form sup-ports the concept of creating connections to the community, specifically Eastern Market and Barrack’s row. The building acts as a guiding force across Eastern Market allowing the axis of the building to draw people to the Transit Center, providing them with a means to connect to the neighboring communities
Glound Level Plan Level Two Plan Level Three Plan Roof Level Plan
42
43
44
Concept Models & Planning Strategies
DC Plan w/ proposed HUB & modes of transportation Site Plan
45
Concept Models
46
47
Circulation Diagram
48Section
Section
49
50Electrical Diagram
West Elevation
East Elevation
Plumbing Diagram Mechanical Diagram
51
54
Site38° 54’ N + 77° 12’ WWashington, DC
Proposed ClientDC Department of Education
ProgramOpen Gallery Kindergarten
The project consisted of designing a small art kindergarten for approximately 20 children. The site was located in northwest Wash-ington, DC in a residential neighborhood. The design solution focused on the use of color and the relationship to its meaning and learning as well as the buildings inte-gration within the surrounding context. The form of the building was two-fold. I looked to mirror the form of the existing houses on the block, and use the function of space to create division; student classrooms and fac-ulty space. I utilized a strong central axis to create separation allowing for student class-rooms on one side with faculty spaces on the other, connected by an outdoor playground space and the lobby / display gallery. The outdoor playground space is centrally posi-tioned at the interior of the site to keep the school activity away from the edges of the site which had a high volume of street traf-
[ A R T I S T I C K I N D E R G A R T E N ]
fic. The playground space helped strengthen the formal division between “learning” space and “administration” space. On each side of playground there is an inner corridor with glass panels that have the ability to open to the outside allowing for the passage of air. The corridor acts to let indirect light into the working spaces. The colored glass panels on both sides of the corridor provide a contrast reaction of the senses while entering into the corridor and classroom at certain times, while at others reflecting into the exterior playground.
55
56
--------
----
----
---- ----
--------
EN
TRY
/ GA
LLER
Y
OFFIC
ES
LOU
NG
E
CLA
SS
RO
OM
#1
CLA
SS
RO
OM
#2
CLA
SS
RO
OM
#3C
AFE
TER
IA
KITC
HE
N
STO
RA
GE
HA
LLH
ALL
EX
TER
IOR
PLAYG
RO
UN
DE
XTE
RIO
RP
LAYGR
OU
ND
GA
RD
EN
GA
RD
EN
RE
STR
OO
MS
Ground Level Plan
57
58
59
60
Site38° 51’ N + 77° 1’ WWashington, DC
Proposed ClientNational Portrait Gallery
ProgramArtist Gallery + Exhibition Center
The project called for the design of an art-ist gallery acting as an extension of the National Gallery of Art. Located on Hain’s point peninsula in Washington, DC, the ex-tension consisted of the main gallery space, a bookstore, a cafe, a lobby, and various support spaces. The implemented design aims to take advantage of certain site con-ditions, most notebly, the views across the river, sun angles, and wind directions on the elongated site. The proposal accentu-ates the elongation of the site was through a continuing path that doubles as the corridor and circulation once it enters the building. The corridor also serves as athe connection point for the different programmatic func-tions of the gallery. The gallery, exhbition space, and private gardens are divided into both exterior and interior, branching off from the main circulation corridor. The corridor controls the outward views with the use of
[ E X H I B I T I O N PAV I L I O N ]
a wooden rain screen focusing the users at-tention on the artwork. The endpoint of the corridor opens up to a panoramic view look-ing back at Washington, DC and revealing the exterior. The corridor also serves as a division point, separating the gallery to the north for more ambient light, and the bookstore and cafe to the south for more direct light. The large solid, rain screen covered volume of the gallery acts to balance the adjacent cor-ridor and opposing glass facade of the lobby, bookstore, and cafe. Within the solid volume are narrow openings under the wooden skin, diffusing the light into the display space for the required ambient light needed to effec-tively display artwork.
61
62
First Level Plan
63
Second Level Plan
64
SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D04 ROOF DETAIL
0 6'' 1' 2'
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELC-RUNNER
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELSTUDS @ 16" O.C.
2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELSOVER 5/8" SHEATHING
BATT INSULATION
MOISTURE BARRIER
W8 X 21 STEEL BEAM
COPPER FLASHING
FASCIA
VENETIAN PLASTERFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD
4" POUREDLIGHTWEIGHTCONCRETE OVERMETAL FLOORDECKING
18" STEEL BAR JOISTS@ 24" O.C.
BATT INSULATION
SMOOTH FACEDINTERIOR CONRETEFINISH OVER 5/8" GYP.BOARD
SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D03 FLOOR DETAIL
0 6'' 1' 2'
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELC-RUNNER
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELSTUDS @ 16" O.C.
2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELS
OVER 5/8" SHEATHINGINTERIOR CONCRETEFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD BATT INSULATION
MOISTURE BARRIER3" POUREDLIGHTWEIGHTCONCRETE OVERMETAL FLOORDECKING
18" STEEL BAR JOISTS@ 24" O.C.BATT INSULATION
SMOOTH FACEDINTERIOR CONRETEFINISH OVER 5/8" GYP.BOARD
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELC-RUNNER
W8 X 21 STEEL BEAM
STEEL COLUMN IN-CASED IN CONRETE @
16' 0.C.
SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D02 FOUNDATION DETAIL
0 6'' 1' 2'
POURED-IN-PLACECONCRETE
FOUNDATION WALL
12" X 24" POUREDCONCRETE,
CONTINUOUS, STRIPFOOTING
5/8" ANCHOR BOLT @ 4FT O.C.
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELC-RUNNER
6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELSTUDS @ 16" O.C.
2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELS
OVER 5/8" SHEATHINGINTERIOR CONCRETEFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD6" REINFORCEDCONCRETE SLAB
4" GRAVEL BED W/ 6MILPVB
BATT INSULATION
MOISTURE BARRIER
SHEAR KEY
65
66
67
68
69
Site38° 49’ N + 76° 11’ WWashington, DC
Proposed Client-
ProgramPrefabricated Modular Dwelling Unit
EnviroNODE is the research + design of a 400sf sustainable, digitally prefabricated modular house. The project utilized digital design technologies, simulation and fabrica-tion technologies in its conception, analysis and construction. Central to the project is the concept of four investigative nodes; mass customization, compact/ hybrid space, sustainable technology, and innovative con-struction strategies. The concept of the node carried into the physical structure of the de-sign. The design used a prefabricated meth-od of assembly allowing for the creation of a set of components and program modules that can be plugged in and arranged in ac-cordance with certain site characteristics. The nodes translate into the interior func-tions of the space - kitchen, bath, sleeping, utility. Any given node can be activated at any time allowing for the user to define the allocation of a specific space or program. This
[ E N V I R O N O D E ]
allows for the maximization of space within the overall living space. The final design in-corporated all of the systems into the prefab-ricated assembly, generating an “off the grid” adaptable space.
70
Galvanized Aluminum Tubes radially framed to create structural platform
Prefabricated Floor Module with Integrated MEP systems, radially framed to create infrastructure platform
7 1
PRIMARY PROGRAM SECONDARY PROGRAM SLIDING PARTITION COMPOSITE NODE
Prefabricated program modules w/ integrated shear bracing, MEP systems, & furniture; site characteristics determine where modules are fixed to floor platform
Program modules support lvl beams which frame openings and cantilevers
72
Prefabricated roof panels w/ integrated lighting, radially framed to create structural ring at roof level
Infill roof w/ conventional wood framing
Node panel diagrams - optimization of interior / exterior space
73
Plywood sheathing over conventional framing Pre-sloped rigid insulation and heat seamed rubber roofing membrane
Interior sliders: closed
Exterior sliders: open
Interior sliders: semi - open
Exterior sliders: semi - open
Interior sliders: open
Exterior sliders: closed
Rotating in: open
Rotating out: open
Rotating in: semi - open
Rotating out: semi - open
Rotating in: closed
Rotating out: closed
74
7/8” hat channels create air gap for rain screen facade panels
Prefabricated / mass customized rain screen panels hung on hat channels
Environmental Analysis
Average daylighting factor
DFavg= T x W x O _________ 2A x (1-R)
T = transmission of glazing (0-1)W = total area of glazing ft2O = angle of sky subtended at the window (degrees)A = total internal surface area, wall, floor, ceilings, and glazing (ft2)R= Area weighted average reflectance of surfaces (0-1)
D a y l i g h t A n a l y s i s
N o d e a n d G l a z i n g O r i e n t a t i o n
H o u r l y Te m p e r a t u r e P r o f i l e
E s t i m a t e d H e a t i n g / C o o l i n g L o a d s
December 21no heating
June 21natural ventilation
Te
mp
er
at
ur
e
T i m e
R e s o u r c e c o n -s u m p t i o n r e -q u i r e d t o m a i n -t a i n a n i n d o o r e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o m f o r t r a n g e b e t w e e n 6 4 a n d 7 8 d e g r e e s F. Ta b l e s l i s t e s t i -m a t e d a n n u a l r e -s o u r c e c o n s u m t -
p i o n i n B T U s .
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
bath south glass in
bath south glass out
bed south glass in
bed south glass outkitchen south glass in
kitchen south glass out
default
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
bath south glass in
bath south glass out
bed south glass in
bed south glass outkitchen south glass in
kitchen south glass out
default
0
10
20
30
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
70
80
90
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
bath south glazing in bath south glazing out
bed south glazing inbed south glazing out
kitchen south glazing inkitchen south glazing out OUTSIDE
%92.0+84.076.068.060.052.044.036.028.020.012.0
June 21
BED
SO
UTH
GLA
ZIN
G I
N
BED
SO
UTH
GLA
ZIN
G O
UT
BAT
H S
OU
TH G
LAZIN
G I
N
BAT
H S
OU
TH G
LAZIN
G O
UT
KIT
CH
EN SO
UTH
GLA
ZIN
G I
N
KIT
CH
EN SO
UTH
GLA
ZIN
G O
UT
75
Customized glazing location responds to site characteristics as well as creating exterior deck spaces
High efficiency photovoltaic panels allow for low slope applications and integrated appearances
76
77