Portfolio of Selected Works

A R C H I T E C T U R E P O R T F O L I OB r a n d o n N e w c o m e r

[ ARCHITEC TUREPORTFOLIO ]

BRANDONNE WCOMERMaster of Architec tureUnivers i t y of Michigan

a. 5698 Pebble D r ive Freder ick , MD 21703c. 240.626.6675e. b [email protected]

w w w.bnewcomer.com

curriculum vitae

atmospheric convention

spatial packing

responsive skin

urban hub

artistic kindergarten

exhibition pavilion

environode

4

6

2 0

3 4

4 0

5 4

6 0

6 8

4

Education

Professional Experience2011

Intern

2009Intern Architect

2007-2008

2003-2004

Intern

Intern

2009

2012

University of Michigan

Catholic University School of Architecture + Planning

Taubman College of Architecture + Ubran Planning

Montgomery College2007

Lehman-S mith McLeish

S teven J. K arr aia, Inc.

King, A sbur y & A ssociates

D imensions Design-Build

Master of Architec ture

Bachelor of S cience in Architec ture

A ssociate of Applied S cience in Architec ture

Entry-level architectural work including programming, design development, construction drawings, presentation drawings and site analysis for interior and core projects

Entry-level architectural work involving schematic design, construction drawings, pre-design analysis, redlines, and initial project management for institutional and commercial projects

Produced architectural research, site visits, and construction drawings for commercial projects

Entry-level architectural work including design development, construction drawings, redlines, 3d modeling, and initial project management for a commercial based project

[ CURRICULUMVITAE ]

5

Design/build of 400sf prefabricated sustainable living unit function “off the grid”

Academic Experience / Research

Montgomery CollegeTaught an advanced 3d computer modeling and architectural presentation course

University of MichiganSustainable Systems II: Assisted in preparing tests, giving lectures, and grading

2011

2010

2011

2008-2009 EnviroNODE

Adjunc t Fac ulty / Lec turer

Graduate S tudent Instruc tor

Net Zero Emissions Building DesignResearch + Design involving net zero emissions housing

2009

2009

2006

Academic Involvement

Awards / Recognitions

Comprehensive Building Design Studio Competition

Honor Society in Architecture - based on academic merit

University of Michigan - merit based scholarship $20,000

Co-Chair / Editor

Portfolio Workshop - Montgomery College

Catholic University + Montgomery College

Project Manager2008-2009

2008-2009

2010-2011

2009

2007-2010

A.S.I.D. Student Competition

C leland S cholarship + Architec ture Grant

Award of D istinc tion _ 2nd Place: (Re)thinking Transit

Tau S igma Delta Honor S ociety

AIAS Communic ations Committee

Invited S peaker / Lec turer

Invited Juror

AIAS Freedom By Design

Winning Entr y _ 1st Place: Emergenc y Relief Housing

6

Site42° 16’ N + 83° 44’ WAnn Arbor, Michigan

Proposed ClientAnn Arbor DDA

ProgramMixed Use Residential Tower

[ AT M O S P H E R I C C O N V E N T I O N ]

The Detroit Convention Center, known as the Cobo Center, exists as a formal and spatial exclusion from the city. The massive structure consumes multiple city blocks removing the user from any sense of their surroundings. However, the Cobo Center has an intricate relationship with the automo-tive industry in Detroit, an industry that provides economic support to the city and building alike. The failure of the automo-tive industry and its resulting evacuation of the city left behind a series of vacancies within the urban fabric. The cities economic decline and the collapse of industry leave the Cobo Center unoccupied and underused. As a standing reserve of unused space, the convention center holds similar atmospheric qualities to the other vacancies within the city. This thesis asserts atmospheric control as a means to renegotiate the boundary be-tween the Cobo Center and the city. Inherent

relationships are established between the spectacle of the auto show and atmospheric qualities used to showcase cars. The spec-tacle is made apparent through the varying control of atmospheres with distinctive re-lationships established between vacancies of the city fabric and the convention center, through atmospheric mappings. Further ex-amination of mediation takes place through the manipulation of enclosure on both inte-rior and exterior space allowing atmospheric qualities permeate the site, generating complex spatial relationships. Programmatic relationships are shaped by these conditions and form spatial intricacies through uncon-ventional means and atmospheric control. The programmatic shifts provide a mix of use and conditioning to allow for the continu-ous programming of the site. The boundary between building and city are blurred by the dispersion of the building’s enclosure and its

extension outward. Through these spatial suggestions the building becomes program-matically integrated to the urban fabric, while formally remaining an exception from the city through its perceived enclosure.

7

8

9

Geneva, Switzerland

Dubai, UAE

Tokyo, Japan

Frankfurt, GermanyParis, France

New York, NYChicago, IL

Las Vegas, NV

Los Angeles, CA

Detroit, MI

[control] naias worldwide as except ion

oakland county government

macomb county government

wayne county government

michigan state legislature

city of detroit

detroit metro convention & visitors bureau

DRCFA

SMG

[control] pol i t ical + governmental as except ion [control] convention as except ionNew Yorkpopulation_ 8.2 millionarea_ 302.6 sq. mi.density_ 27000 /sq. mi.

Grand Rapidspopulation_ 188,040area_ 44.4 sq. mi.density_ 4235.1/sq. mi.

regional venues of similar typologysized relative to sq footage & cobo center

footprint of building & block relative to square footage of building

St. Louis

Chicagoc.1960cost_ $35 million> 2,600,000 sf

c.1974cost_ $15 million500,000 sf

c.1974cost_ $82 million>1,000,000 sf

c.1968cost_ n/a750,000 sf

c.1981cost_ $373 million>1,500,000 sf

c.1922cost_ n/a>400,000 sf

c.1984cost_ n/a>600,000 sf

c.2003cost_ n/a260,000 sf

c.1987cost_ n/a<100,000 sf

c.1986cost_ n/a>700,000 sf

c.1993cost_ n/a>1,000,000 sf

c.1960cost_ $56 million2,400,000 sf

c.1977cost_ n/a>500,000 sf

Milwaukee

Toronto

Pittsburgh

Cincinnati

Indianapolis

New York

c.2005cost_ $850 million>2,100,000 sf

Boston

Philadelphia

c.2003cost_ n/a>2,300,000 sf

Washington, DC

Detroit

Detroitpopulation_ 713,700area_ 138.5 sq. mi.density_5,142/sq. mi.

Chicagopopulation_ 2.7 millionarea_ 227.6 sq. mi.density_ 11,843 /sq. mi.

Indianapolispopulation_ 820,445area_ 361 sq. mi.density_ 2,270 /sq. mi.

Milwaukeepopulation_ 594,833area_ 96.1 sq. mi.density_ 6189.7 /sq. mi.

St. Louispopulation_ 319,294area_ 61.9 sq. mi.density_ 5158.2 /sq. mi.

Toledopopulation_ 287,200area_ 80.7 sq. mi.density_ 3559 /sq. mi.

Torontopopulation_ 2.5 millionarea_ 243.2 sq. mi.density_ 10,287 /sq. mi.

Clevelandpopulation_ 396,815area_ 77.7 sq. mi.density_ 5107 /sq. mi.

Pittsburghpopulation_ 305,704area_ 55.4 sq. mi.density_ 5518.1 /sq. mi.

Columbuspopulation_ 787,033area_ 217.2 sq. mi.density_ 3623.5 /sq. mi.

Cincinnatipopulation_ 296,943area_ 77 sq. mi.density_ 3811.8 /sq. mi.

Bostonpopulation_ 617,594area_ 48.3 sq. mi.density_ 12786 /sq. mi.

Philadelphiapopulation_ 1.5 millionarea_ 134.1 sq. mi.density_ 11380 /sq. mi.

Washington, DCpopulation_ 601,720area_ 61 sq. mi.density_ 9864 /sq. mi.

ClevelandToledo

c.1993cost_ n/a1,700,000 sf

Columbus

Grand Rapids

10

1 1

12

atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I

longitudinal bui ld ing sec t ion

atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I I

13

atmospher ic condit ions plan: level I I I atmospher ic condit ions plan: level IV

14

15

t yp. condit ion I

t yp. condit ion I I

t yp. condit ion I I I

16

Office

Support

Support

Support

Banquet Hall

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Hotel

Hotel

Banquet Hall Support

Office

Office

Office

Hotel

Support

Management Performance Theater

Prefunction Services

Staging Area

Office

Support

Support

Support

Banquet Hall

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Support

Hotel

Hotel

Banquet Hall Support

Office

Office

Office

Hotel

Support

Management Performance Theater


Staging Area

s i te strategy I - zone ident i f icat ion

Ground Level - P lan

s i te strategy I I - zone separat ion

Ground Level + I - P lan

1 7

Office

Support

Support

Support

Office

Office

Office

Management

NAIAS Office

Conference

Hotel

Services

Hotel

Office

Support

Banquet Hall

Support

SupportSupport

Support

Hotel

Performance Theater

mech + elec

storage

loading docks

mech + elec

mech + elec

storage

loading docks

Support

Office

Office

Support

Support

Support

Office

Staging Area

Support

Office

Office

Office

Hotel

Hotel


Support

Support

Banquet Hall

Management

NAIAS Office

Conference

Hotel

Services

Support

Support

Performance Theater

Banquet HallSupport

Support

Hotel

Hotel

Support

Support

Hotel

Hotel

Support

s i te strategy I I I - zone program distr ibut ion - ser v ices

Upper Level - P lan

site strategy IV - zone integrat ion

Upper Level +I - P lan

18

19

20

Site42° 16’ N + 83° 44’ WAnn Arbor, Michigan

Proposed ClientAnn Arbor DDA

ProgramMixed Use Residential Tower

[ S PAT I A L PA C K I N G ]

Spatial Packing was undertaken as a gradu-ate comprehensive studio focused on mid-rise, mixed use housing in downtown Ann Arbor. The requirements were to provide varying sizes of units for mixed income fami-lies. The design addresses multiple site con-ditions and the demands and requirements of downtown conditions. The site was split into two buildings. A smaller low rise build-ing faced the adjacent library and residential housing with live work studios on the ground floor as well as other public amenities. The roof slopes to respond to sun angles, ideal views, and the change in surrounding build-ing elevations. The corner was emphasized by a large community space that connects the corridors and lobby space. The second of the buildings is a taller mid-rise tower that seeks to be a landmark building and place of destination. The floors are broken up into a series of community nodes providing double

height community spaces which vary in func-tion every four stories. The tower responds to the surrounding context in a similar way as the lower bar building, with regards to sun angles, views, and neighboring context. Connecting the two buildings is an exterior courtyard that is the main public catalyst for the project. The courtyard connects the pub-lic from the adjoining bus transit center. The courtyard acts to support the influx of people with a array of transit oriented commercial and retail amenities. The facade pushes and pulls of the building creating a dynamic ar-ray of units and balconies while responding to local climate and energy conditions. It em-ploys a series of screens and glazed panels that add to its dynamic nature.

21

22

Ramp to Garage Level

144 Bicycle Spaces

78 Storage Spaces

Boutique Shop

15' CLTurning Radii

10 Parking Spaces4 ADA Parking Space

2950 SF Urban Life ShopBike Store

Weights

Water / Sewer / Telecommunications / Electrical Connections Room

Restaurant Patio

Womens

Telecom & ElecChase

Mens

Kitchen

1560 sf Bar/Restaurant

860 sf Retail/ Boutique

Live/Work First Floor



1200 Cafe




Telecom & ElecChase

HVA

C a

nd F

ire

Sup

pres

sion

Pip

es

Fire System Panel

Mechanical Space

Boutique Retail Annex

Boutique Annex

Cafe Annex

Mec

hani

cal S

pace

Exit Ramp

20%

Telecommunications& Electrical

Tele

com

mun

icat

ions

& E

lect

rical

Mai

ntai

nenc

e S

tora

ge

Maintainence Storage

Entry Ramp 20%

160 Bicycle Spaces

Ramp to Garage Level

144 Bicycle Spaces

78 Storage Spaces

Boutique Shop

15' CLTurning Radii

10 Parking Spaces4 ADA Parking Space

2950 SF Urban Life ShopBike Store

Weights

Water / Sewer / Telecommunications / Electrical Connections Room

Restaurant Patio

Womens

Telecom & ElecChase

Mens

Kitchen

1560 sf Bar/Restaurant

860 sf Retail/ Boutique




1200 Cafe




Telecom & ElecChase

HVA

C a

nd F

ire

Sup

pres

sion

Pip

es

Fire System Panel

Mechanical Space

Boutique Retail Annex

Boutique Annex

Cafe Annex

Mec

hani

cal S

pace

Exit Ramp

20%

Telecommunications& Electrical

Tele

com

mun

icat

ions

& E

lect

rical

Mai

ntai

nenc

e S

tora

ge

Maintainence Storage

Entry Ramp 20%

160 Bicycle Spaces

Ground Level Plan

Basement Plan

23

24

Massing Diagrams

25

26floor plans- levels 2-5 floor plans- levels 6-9

27floor plans- levels 10-13 floor plans- levels 14-17

28

29

30

Site Plan

31

34

35

[ Skin ]

Initial research lead to the development of a new building “skin” that responds and adapts to the exterior environment. The responsive factors based on site location and climate are humidity, temperature, percipitation, and wind. The skin will adapt to those exterior factors based on the perception of accept-able environmental quality. The adaptability to these factor results in a limitless number of possible facade conditions. The skin devel-opment also aims to respond to the presence of the interior user.

[ R E S P O N S I V E S K I N ]

Site38° 53’ N + 76° 59’ WHouston, TX

Proposed Client-

ProgramAdaptive Facade System

[ Focus ]

Building on the notion that indoor environ-mental quality is one of the most important aspects of design, the research engages cur-rent climate and atmospheric conditions at-tempting to manipulate or enhance how we perceive the indoor environment. Current building techniques are applied in a way that secludes us from experiencing these condi-tions while on the interior. The research and design strategies aim to develop a respon-sive system connecting the end-user with the exterior environment; a system that responds to and changes depending on exte-rior climate factors. The proposal speculates at the possibilities of harnessing climate conditions in a more productive means, go-ing beyond current applications for energy collection and generation.

36

37

40

41

and the rest of DC. The interior spaces gives way to the form creating the sense of the dy-namic movement present in the systems in-teracting with the building. It allows for the creating of both large open spaces and more enclosed intimate spaces. The design utilizes various sustainable strategies, specifically an operable louver systems, high-efficiency l.e.d. lighting, photovoltaics, integrated in-sulation, and sustainable m/e/p systems.

[ U R B A N H U B ]

Site38° 53’ N + 76° 59’ WWashington, DC

Proposed ClientDC Department of Transportation

ProgramTransit Oriented DevelopmentMixed Use

UbranHUB involves the design and develop-ment of a transit oriented, mixed use center located in the Capitol Hill district of Wash-ington, DC. The hub is to support multiple modes of public transportation and the new-ly proposed street car network. The design aims to solve several architectural issues in a rundown neighborhood with emphasis being placed on the connection of the surrounding neighborhoods and the design of a strong public integration. Formally the building represents the multiple modes of transpor-tation while also using structural concrete to allow for less interior columns. The form sup-ports the concept of creating connections to the community, specifically Eastern Market and Barrack’s row. The building acts as a guiding force across Eastern Market allowing the axis of the building to draw people to the Transit Center, providing them with a means to connect to the neighboring communities

Glound Level Plan Level Two Plan Level Three Plan Roof Level Plan

42

43

44

Concept Models & Planning Strategies

DC Plan w/ proposed HUB & modes of transportation Site Plan

45

Concept Models

46

47

Circulation Diagram

48Section

Section

49

50Electrical Diagram

West Elevation

East Elevation

Plumbing Diagram Mechanical Diagram

51

54


Proposed ClientDC Department of Education

ProgramOpen Gallery Kindergarten

The project consisted of designing a small art kindergarten for approximately 20 children. The site was located in northwest Wash-ington, DC in a residential neighborhood. The design solution focused on the use of color and the relationship to its meaning and learning as well as the buildings inte-gration within the surrounding context. The form of the building was two-fold. I looked to mirror the form of the existing houses on the block, and use the function of space to create division; student classrooms and fac-ulty space. I utilized a strong central axis to create separation allowing for student class-rooms on one side with faculty spaces on the other, connected by an outdoor playground space and the lobby / display gallery. The outdoor playground space is centrally posi-tioned at the interior of the site to keep the school activity away from the edges of the site which had a high volume of street traf-

[ A R T I S T I C K I N D E R G A R T E N ]

fic. The playground space helped strengthen the formal division between “learning” space and “administration” space. On each side of playground there is an inner corridor with glass panels that have the ability to open to the outside allowing for the passage of air. The corridor acts to let indirect light into the working spaces. The colored glass panels on both sides of the corridor provide a contrast reaction of the senses while entering into the corridor and classroom at certain times, while at others reflecting into the exterior playground.

55

56

--------

----

----

---- ----

--------

EN

TRY

/ GA

LLER

Y

OFFIC

ES

LOU

NG

E

CLA

SS

RO

OM

#1

CLA

SS

RO

OM

#2

CLA

SS

RO

OM

#3C

AFE

TER

IA

KITC

HE

N

STO

RA

GE

HA

LLH

ALL

EX

TER

IOR

PLAYG

RO

UN

DE

XTE

RIO

RP

LAYGR

OU

ND

GA

RD

EN

GA

RD

EN

RE

STR

OO

MS

Ground Level Plan

57

58

59

60


Proposed ClientNational Portrait Gallery

ProgramArtist Gallery + Exhibition Center

The project called for the design of an art-ist gallery acting as an extension of the National Gallery of Art. Located on Hain’s point peninsula in Washington, DC, the ex-tension consisted of the main gallery space, a bookstore, a cafe, a lobby, and various support spaces. The implemented design aims to take advantage of certain site con-ditions, most notebly, the views across the river, sun angles, and wind directions on the elongated site. The proposal accentu-ates the elongation of the site was through a continuing path that doubles as the corridor and circulation once it enters the building. The corridor also serves as athe connection point for the different programmatic func-tions of the gallery. The gallery, exhbition space, and private gardens are divided into both exterior and interior, branching off from the main circulation corridor. The corridor controls the outward views with the use of

[ E X H I B I T I O N PAV I L I O N ]

a wooden rain screen focusing the users at-tention on the artwork. The endpoint of the corridor opens up to a panoramic view look-ing back at Washington, DC and revealing the exterior. The corridor also serves as a division point, separating the gallery to the north for more ambient light, and the bookstore and cafe to the south for more direct light. The large solid, rain screen covered volume of the gallery acts to balance the adjacent cor-ridor and opposing glass facade of the lobby, bookstore, and cafe. Within the solid volume are narrow openings under the wooden skin, diffusing the light into the display space for the required ambient light needed to effec-tively display artwork.

61

62

First Level Plan

63

Second Level Plan

64

SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D04 ROOF DETAIL

0 6'' 1' 2'

6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELC-RUNNER

6" LIGHT GAUGE STEELSTUDS @ 16" O.C.

2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELSOVER 5/8" SHEATHING

BATT INSULATION

MOISTURE BARRIER

W8 X 21 STEEL BEAM

COPPER FLASHING

FASCIA

VENETIAN PLASTERFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD

4" POUREDLIGHTWEIGHTCONCRETE OVERMETAL FLOORDECKING

18" STEEL BAR JOISTS@ 24" O.C.

BATT INSULATION

SMOOTH FACEDINTERIOR CONRETEFINISH OVER 5/8" GYP.BOARD

SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D03 FLOOR DETAIL

0 6'' 1' 2'



2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELS

OVER 5/8" SHEATHINGINTERIOR CONCRETEFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD BATT INSULATION

MOISTURE BARRIER3" POUREDLIGHTWEIGHTCONCRETE OVERMETAL FLOORDECKING

18" STEEL BAR JOISTS@ 24" O.C.BATT INSULATION

SMOOTH FACEDINTERIOR CONRETEFINISH OVER 5/8" GYP.BOARD


W8 X 21 STEEL BEAM

STEEL COLUMN IN-CASED IN CONRETE @

16' 0.C.

SCALE: 1'' = 1' - 0''D02 FOUNDATION DETAIL

0 6'' 1' 2'

POURED-IN-PLACECONCRETE

FOUNDATION WALL

12" X 24" POUREDCONCRETE,

CONTINUOUS, STRIPFOOTING

5/8" ANCHOR BOLT @ 4FT O.C.



2" EXTERIORCONCRETE PANELS

OVER 5/8" SHEATHINGINTERIOR CONCRETEFINISH OVER 2-LAYERS5/8" GYP. BOARD6" REINFORCEDCONCRETE SLAB

4" GRAVEL BED W/ 6MILPVB

BATT INSULATION

MOISTURE BARRIER

SHEAR KEY

65

66

67

68

69


Proposed Client-

ProgramPrefabricated Modular Dwelling Unit

EnviroNODE is the research + design of a 400sf sustainable, digitally prefabricated modular house. The project utilized digital design technologies, simulation and fabrica-tion technologies in its conception, analysis and construction. Central to the project is the concept of four investigative nodes; mass customization, compact/ hybrid space, sustainable technology, and innovative con-struction strategies. The concept of the node carried into the physical structure of the de-sign. The design used a prefabricated meth-od of assembly allowing for the creation of a set of components and program modules that can be plugged in and arranged in ac-cordance with certain site characteristics. The nodes translate into the interior func-tions of the space - kitchen, bath, sleeping, utility. Any given node can be activated at any time allowing for the user to define the allocation of a specific space or program. This

[ E N V I R O N O D E ]

allows for the maximization of space within the overall living space. The final design in-corporated all of the systems into the prefab-ricated assembly, generating an “off the grid” adaptable space.

70

Galvanized Aluminum Tubes radially framed to create structural platform

Prefabricated Floor Module with Integrated MEP systems, radially framed to create infrastructure platform

7 1

PRIMARY PROGRAM SECONDARY PROGRAM SLIDING PARTITION COMPOSITE NODE

Prefabricated program modules w/ integrated shear bracing, MEP systems, & furniture; site characteristics determine where modules are fixed to floor platform

Program modules support lvl beams which frame openings and cantilevers

72

Prefabricated roof panels w/ integrated lighting, radially framed to create structural ring at roof level

Infill roof w/ conventional wood framing

Node panel diagrams - optimization of interior / exterior space

73

Plywood sheathing over conventional framing Pre-sloped rigid insulation and heat seamed rubber roofing membrane

Interior sliders: closed

Exterior sliders: open

Interior sliders: semi - open

Exterior sliders: semi - open

Interior sliders: open

Exterior sliders: closed

Rotating in: open

Rotating out: open

Rotating in: semi - open

Rotating out: semi - open

Rotating in: closed

Rotating out: closed

74

7/8” hat channels create air gap for rain screen facade panels

Prefabricated / mass customized rain screen panels hung on hat channels

Environmental Analysis

Average daylighting factor

DFavg= T x W x O _________ 2A x (1-R)

T = transmission of glazing (0-1)W = total area of glazing ft2O = angle of sky subtended at the window (degrees)A = total internal surface area, wall, floor, ceilings, and glazing (ft2)R= Area weighted average reflectance of surfaces (0-1)

D a y l i g h t A n a l y s i s

N o d e a n d G l a z i n g O r i e n t a t i o n

H o u r l y Te m p e r a t u r e P r o f i l e

E s t i m a t e d H e a t i n g / C o o l i n g L o a d s

December 21no heating

June 21natural ventilation

Te

mp

er

at

ur

e

T i m e

R e s o u r c e c o n -s u m p t i o n r e -q u i r e d t o m a i n -t a i n a n i n d o o r e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o m f o r t r a n g e b e t w e e n 6 4 a n d 7 8 d e g r e e s F. Ta b l e s l i s t e s t i -m a t e d a n n u a l r e -s o u r c e c o n s u m t -

p i o n i n B T U s .

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

30000000

bath south glass in

bath south glass out

bed south glass in

bed south glass outkitchen south glass in

kitchen south glass out

default

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

bath south glass in

bath south glass out

bed south glass in

bed south glass outkitchen south glass in

kitchen south glass out

default

0

10

20

30

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

70

80

90

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

bath south glazing in bath south glazing out

bed south glazing inbed south glazing out

kitchen south glazing inkitchen south glazing out OUTSIDE

%92.0+84.076.068.060.052.044.036.028.020.012.0

June 21

BED

SO

UTH

GLA

ZIN

G I

N

BED

SO

UTH

GLA

ZIN

G O

UT

BAT

H S

OU

TH G

LAZIN

G I

N

BAT

H S

OU

TH G

LAZIN

G O

UT

KIT

CH

EN SO

UTH

GLA

ZIN

G I

N

KIT

CH

EN SO

UTH

GLA

ZIN

G O

UT

75

Customized glazing location responds to site characteristics as well as creating exterior deck spaces

High efficiency photovoltaic panels allow for low slope applications and integrated appearances

76

77

Documents

Portfolio of Selected Works