Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ZANESVILLE CITY SCHOOLS STP SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL TRAVEL PLAN
February 2015
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
1
School District School Name School Address Grades served
Zanesville City Schools John McIntire Elementary 1275 Roosevelt Ave. Zanesville, OH 43701
K‐6
Your School’s Students 2013‐2014 Average Daily
Student Enrollment
Black, non‐
Hispanic
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Hispanic Multi‐Racial
White, non‐
Hispanic
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English
Proficient
Students with
Disabilities Migrant
702 9.3% N/A N/A 1.6% 12.4% 75.7% 67% N/A 20.2% N/A
School District School Name School Address Grades served
Zanesville City Schools National Road Elementary 3505 East Pike Zanesville, OH 43701
K‐6
Your School’s Students 2013‐2014 Average Daily
Student Enrollment
Black, non‐
Hispanic
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Hispanic Multi‐Racial
White, non‐
Hispanic
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English
Proficient
Students with
Disabilities Migrant
422 5.2% N/A N/A 3.5% 15.7% 75.2% 89.1% N/A 25.8% N/A
School District School Name School Address Grades served
Zanesville City Schools Zane Grey Elementary 711 Fess St. Zanesville, OH 43701
K‐6
Your School’s Students 2013‐2014 Average Daily
Student Enrollment
Black, non‐
Hispanic
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Hispanic Multi‐Racial
White, non‐
Hispanic
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English
Proficient
Students with
Disabilities Migrant
751 15% N/A N/A 1.9% 26% 57.1% 94.3% N/A 22.2% N/A
School District School Name School Address Grades served
Zanesville City Schools Zanesville Middle School 1429 Blue Ave. Zanesville, OH 43701
7‐8
Your School’s Students 2013‐2014 Average Daily
Student Enrollment
Black, non‐
Hispanic
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Hispanic Multi‐Racial
White, non‐
Hispanic
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English
Proficient
Students with
Disabilities Migrant
480 11.2% N/A N/A N/A 16.5% 70.4% 76.9% N/A 22.4% N/A
SECTION 1: OUR SCHOOL(S)
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
2
1A. Community Stakeholders and the Safe Routes to School Team School Representatives:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Ron Denton, Zanesville City Schools
[email protected] Encouragement, Education, Enforcement
Community Representatives:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Sandy Gentry, Zanesville City Council
[email protected] Encouragement, Education
Tim Arnold, Local Business Owner
Encouragement, Education
Local Government Representatives:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Fred Buck, City of Zanesville [email protected]
Evaluation, Encouragement, Education
Chip Saunders, City of Zanesville
[email protected] Engineering
Craig Stemm, City of Zanesville [email protected] Engineering
Education Representative:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Steve Foreman, Zanesville City Schools and Zanesville City Council
[email protected] Encouragement, Education, Enforcement
Health Representatives:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Beverly Guinsler, Zanesville City Schools
[email protected] Encouragement, Education
Public Safety Representatives:
Name Email address 5 E Role:
Tony Coury, Zanesville Police Department
[email protected] Enforcement, Education
1B. The lead contact for our Plan is: Name: Fred Buck
Affiliation: City of Zanesville Phone Number: 740‐455‐0601 x107 Email address: [email protected] Mailing address: 401 Market Street, Zanesville, OH 43701
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
3
Body Mass Index for Ohio’s Third Grade Students A review of the Report on the Body Mass Index of Ohio’s Third Graders, conducted by the Ohio Department of Health, found that childhood obesity is one of the most important public health issues in Ohio with more than 30 percent of children and adolescents classified as overweight or obese. In a 2009‐2010 study, it was reported that 36.4% of third grade students living in Muskingum County, where the Zanesville City Schools are located, have a prevalence of being overweight or obese. A map showing the percentage of overweight and obese third graders by county can be found in Appendix A. Through physical activity, such as walking or biking to and from school, or educating youth about the importance of an active lifestyle, ODOT’s Safe Routes to School Program hopes to foster awareness and prevention to combat this serious public health issue.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
4
Our SRTS Vision:
SECTION 2: OUR SRTS VISION
It is the vision of the Zanesville SRTS planning team to: increase the number of students who walk and bicycle to school by making it safer for them. The school travel plan will result in a healthier school‐age population and students developing life‐long healthy habits.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
5
3A. How many students live within walking and bicycling distance of school? (Distances are cumulative; meaning that “within a ½‐mile of school” would include students within a ¼‐mile as well.)
John McIntire Elementary:
Distance From School Number of Students
% of Student Body
Within a ¼‐mile of school 42 6%
Within a ½‐mile of school 79 11%
Within 1 mile of school 290 39%
Within 2 miles of school 568 77%
Mapping student addresses. A map showing the school attendance boundary, school site and dots indicating where students live is included is Appendix B.
3B. How many students are currently walking and bicycling to school? What are the primary walking and bicycling routes?
John McIntire Elementary:
Walk Bike School Bus
Family Vehicle
Carpool Public Transit
Other
Number of students (morning trips)
31% NA 63% 6% NA NA NA
Number of students (afternoon trips)
31% NA 61% 6% NA NA N/A
Primary walking / bicycling routes
Roosevelt, McIntire, Blue, and State.
3C. Are there any school or district policies that impact students walking or bicycling
to school?
District Bus Policies Policy: “Children living beyond the following walking limits shall be entitled to bus transportation:
A. Grades K through 6: one (1) mile
B. Grades 7 through 12: one (1) mile
Exceptions to the foregoing limits may be made … in the case of adverse safety conditions.” How it affects student travel modes (3‐5 sentences): As written, the policy encourages students who live close to school to walk or bicycle.
SECTION 3: CURRENT STUDENT TRAVEL – JOHN MCINTIRE ELEMENTARY
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
6
School Travel Policies The school follows the district’s bus policy. How it affects student travel modes (3‐5 sentences): Please see above. 3D. School Arrival and Dismissal Process.
Do school buses and parent vehicles use the same driveway for arrival and dismissal? Yes, all vehicles use the same driveway. No, there are separate driveways for family vehicles and school buses.
Do all students use the same entrance to the school building in the morning? Yes, all students enter the building at the same location. No, students can use different entrances. Walkers use the front door. Bus riders and students who are dropped off in cars use the rear door.
Are all students released at the same time during dismissal? Yes, all students are released at the same time.
No, we use a staggered release process. Students who are picked up in cars are dismissed first, then bus riders and walkers are dismissed last.
Is school staff involved in either arrival or dismissal? Yes, we have school staff help students enter and exit the campus safely.
No, school staff is not involved in either arrival or dismissal.
Are there any adult crossing guards located along student walking routes? Yes, we have at least one adult crossing guard that helps students on their
walking routes. No, we do not have any adult crossing guards serving our school.
Are there police officers that help with arrival or dismissal procedures at this school? Yes, we have at least one police officer helping direct traffic around our
school. No we do not have police officers who help direct traffic around the school.
Are students involved in any arrival or dismissal process (i.e. student safety patrol)? Yes, we have a student safety patrol.
No, we do not have a student safety patrol. Students perform crossing guard duties off school property at Blue and McIntire and Western and McIntire.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
7
Parents commented and shared the following concerns: they do not allow their students to walk to school due to the distance they would have to walk; safety concerns in general, with sex offenders mentioned specifically; students’ ages; driver behavior in school zones and near the school; and the safety of crossings along the routes students would take to walk or bicycle to school. Other comments included: crossing guards need additional training; lack of school zone markings and signs near the school and incomplete sidewalks on Roosevelt and on Blue across from the school.
City and school officials expressed concerns over students crossing at the 5‐point intersection; and that the McIntire site is the worst of the four in the STP because there is no place for the cars to go, and congestion is very heavy.
3E. Parent Attitudes towards walking and biking.
Reasons for not allowing children to walk or bicycle to school:
Distance
Weather or Climate
Speed of Traffic Along the Route
Amount of Traffic Along the Route
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
3F. Safety Issues and Concerns.
Relevant traffic crashes.
There were 37 bicycle or pedestrian related crashes within 2 miles of the school (from 2011‐2013). The crashes resulted in 27 injuries and 1 fatality. The number of crashes that involved bicycles was 16. The number of crashes that involved pedestrians was 21.
3G. Walking and bicycling encouragement activities at the school. Identify and describe
activities at your school that support or encourage walking and bicycling.
Activity How it encourages walking or bicycling (1‐3 sentences)
Safety Town sponsored by United Way
Incoming kindergarteners learn about general safety, as well as walking and bicycling safety over the summer
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
8
3A. How many students live within walking and bicycling distance of school? (Distances are cumulative; meaning that “within a ½‐mile of school” would include students within a ¼‐mile as well.)
National Road Elementary:
Distance From School Number of Students
% of Student Body
Within a ¼‐mile of school 41 9%
Within a ½‐mile of school 44 10%
Within 1 mile of school 66 66%
Within 2 miles of school 108 25%
Mapping student addresses. A map showing the school attendance boundary, school site and dots indicating where students live is included is Appendix B.
3B. How many students are currently walking and bicycling to school? What are the primary walking and bicycling routes?
National Road Elementary:
Walk Bike School Bus
Family Vehicle
Carpool Public Transit
Other
Number of students (morning trips)
7% NA 80% 13% 0.3% NA NA
Number of students (afternoon trips)
8% NA 82% 10% NA NA NA
Primary walking / bicycling routes
Exit school and walk down the hill adjacent to school property to Troon Crossing neighborhood.
3C. Are there any school or district policies that impact students walking or bicycling
to school? See Section 3C under John McIntire Elementary.
SECTION 3: CURRENT STUDENT TRAVEL – NATIONAL ROAD ELEMENTARY
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
9
3D. School Arrival and Dismissal Process.
Do school buses and parent vehicles use the same driveway for arrival and dismissal? Yes, all vehicles use the same driveway. No, there are separate driveways for family vehicles and school buses.
Do all students use the same entrance to the school building in the morning? Yes, all students enter the building at the same location.
No, students can use different entrances. Walkers use the front door. Bus riders and students who are dropped off in cars use the rear door.
Are all students released at the same time during dismissal? Yes, all students are released at the same time.
No, we use a staggered release process. Students who are picked up in cars are dismissed first, then bus riders and walkers
are dismissed last.
Is school staff involved in either arrival or dismissal? Yes, we have school staff help students enter and exit the campus safely. No, school staff is not involved in either arrival or dismissal.
Are there any adult crossing guards located along student walking routes? Yes, we have at least one adult crossing guard that helps students on their
walking routes. No, we do not have any adult crossing guards serving our school.
Are there police officers that help with arrival or dismissal procedures at this school? Yes, we have at least one police officer helping direct traffic around our
school. No we do not have police officers who help direct traffic around the school.
Are students involved in any arrival or dismissal process (i.e. student safety patrol)? Yes, we have a student safety patrol. No, we do not have a student safety patrol.
3E. Parent Attitudes towards walking and biking.
Reasons for not allowing children to walk or bicycle to school:
Distance
Amount of Traffic Along the Route
Speed of Traffic Along the Route
Weather or Climate
Safety of Intersections & Crossings
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
10
Parents commented and shared the following concerns: they do not allow their students to walk to school due to the distance they would have to walk; concerns over a lack of sidewalks along Route 40; the speed and volume of traffic along the route (US 40 that students would have to take to school); safety concerns in general; and students’ ages. Other comments included adding a path, sidewalk or steps from the school property to the Troon Crossing housing development, directly adjacent to the school property.
School and city officials noted the location of a new transit bus stop at the bottom of the school driveway. They said parents use transit to come to school for activities and meetings.
3F. Safety Issues and Concerns.
Relevant traffic crashes.
There were 0 bicycle or pedestrian related crashes within 2 miles of the school (from 2011‐2013).
3G. Walking and bicycling encouragement activities at the school. Identify and describe
activities at your school that support or encourage walking and bicycling.
Activity How it encourages walking or bicycling (1‐3 sentences)
Safety Town sponsored by United Way
Incoming kindergarteners learn about general safety, as well as walking and bicycling safety over the summer
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
11
3A. How many students live within walking and bicycling distance of school? (Distances are cumulative; meaning that “within a ½‐mile of school” would include students within a ¼‐mile as well.)
Zane Grey Elementary:
Distance From School Number of Students
% of Student Body
Within a ¼‐mile of school 53 7%
Within a ½‐mile of school 187 24%
Within 1 mile of school 571 73%
Within 2 miles of school 724 93%
Mapping student addresses. A map showing the school attendance boundary, school site and dots indicating where students live is included is Appendix B.
3B. How many students are currently walking and bicycling to school? What are the primary walking and bicycling routes?
Zane Grey Elementary:
Walk Bike School Bus
Family Vehicle
Carpool Public Transit
Other
Number of students (morning trips)
19% 0.6% 46% 31% 3% NA NA
Number of students (afternoon trips)
20% 0.6% 46% 30% 4% NA NA
Primary walking / bicycling routes
Pine, Fess, Superior and Pershing.
3C. Are there any school or district policies that impact students walking or bicycling
to school? See Section 3C under John McIntire Elementary.
SECTION 3: CURRENT STUDENT TRAVEL – ZANE GREY ELEMENTARY
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
12
3D. School Arrival and Dismissal Process.
Do school buses and parent vehicles use the same driveway for arrival and dismissal? Yes, all vehicles use the same driveway. No, there are separate driveways for family vehicles and school buses.
Do all students use the same entrance to the school building in the morning? Yes, all students enter the building at the same location.
No, students can use different entrances. Walkers use the front door. Bus riders and students who are dropped off in cars use the rear door.
Are all students released at the same time during dismissal? Yes, all students are released at the same time.
No, we use a staggered release process. Students who are picked up in cars are dismissed first, then bus riders and walkers are dismissed last.
Is school staff involved in either arrival or dismissal? Yes, we have school staff help students enter and exit the campus safely. No, school staff is not involved in either arrival or dismissal.
Are there any adult crossing guards located along student walking routes? Yes, we have at least one adult crossing guard that helps students on their
walking routes. No, we do not have any adult crossing guards serving our school.
Are there police officers that help with arrival or dismissal procedures at this school? Yes, we have at least one police officer helping direct traffic around our school. No we do not have police officers who help direct traffic around the school.
Are students involved in any arrival or dismissal process (i.e. student safety patrol)? Yes, we have a student safety patrol. No, we do not have a student safety patrol.
3E. Parent Attitudes towards walking and biking.
Reasons for not allowing children to walk or bicycle to school:
Violence or Crime
Distance
Amount of Traffic Along Route
Weather or Climate
Speed of Traffic Along the Route
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
13
Parents commented and shared the following concerns: safety concerns in general; they do not allow their students to walk to school due to the distance they would have to walk; concerns over the speed and volume of traffic along the routes students would take to walk or bicycle to school; loose dogs; and distracted drivers. Other comments included missing sidewalks on Pershing, between Putnam and Peircast; and adding a crossing guard at Pershing and Pine.
School officials commented on the possibility of moving the signal and crosswalk on Fess.
3F. Safety Issues and Concerns.
Relevant traffic crashes.
There were 32 bicycle or pedestrian related crashes within 2 miles of the school (from 2011‐2013). The crashes resulted in 26 injuries and 0 fatalities. The number of crashes that involved bicycles was 12. The number of crashes that involved pedestrians was 20.
3G. Walking and bicycling encouragement activities at the school.
Activity How it encourages walking or bicycling (1‐3 sentences)
Safety Town sponsored by United Way
Incoming kindergarteners learn about general safety, as well as walking and bicycling safety over the summer
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
14
3A. How many students live within walking and bicycling distance of school? (Distances are cumulative; meaning that “within a ½‐mile of school” would include students within a ¼‐mile as well.)
Zanesville Middle School:
Distance From School Number of Students
% of Student Body
Within a ¼‐mile of school 8 2%
Within a ½‐mile of school 49 10%
Within 1 mile of school 112 22%
Within 2 miles of school 278 56%
Mapping student addresses. A map showing the school attendance boundary, school site and dots indicating where students live is included is Appendix B.
3B. How many students are currently walking and bicycling to school? What are the primary walking and bicycling routes?
Zanesville Middle School:
Walk Bike School Bus
Family Vehicle
Carpool Public Transit
Other
Number of students (morning trips)
7% 1% 59% 27% 3% 1% 1%
Number of students (afternoon trips)
12 1% 59% 21% 3% 1% 1%
Primary walking / bicycling routes
Blue, Fairmount and Locust.
3C. Are there any school or district policies that impact students walking or bicycling
to school? See Section 3C under John McIntire Elementary.
SECTION 3: CURRENT STUDENT TRAVEL – ZANESVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
15
3D. School Arrival and Dismissal Process.
Do school buses and parent vehicles use the same driveway for arrival and dismissal? Yes, all vehicles use the same driveway. No, there are separate driveways for family vehicles and school buses.
Do all students use the same entrance to the school building in the morning? Yes, all students enter the building at the same location.
No, students can use different entrances. Walkers use the front door. Bus riders and students who are dropped off in cars use the rear door.
Are all students released at the same time during dismissal?
Yes, all students are released at the same time. No, we use a staggered release process (walkers are released first, bus riders
second, etc.).
Is school staff involved in either arrival or dismissal? Yes, we have school staff help students enter and exit the campus safely. No, school staff is not involved in either arrival or dismissal.
Are there any adult crossing guards located along student walking routes? Yes, we have at least one adult crossing guard that helps students on their
walking routes. No, we do not have any adult crossing guards serving our school.
Are there police officers that help with arrival or dismissal procedures at this school? Yes, we have at least one police officer helping direct traffic around our
school. No we do not have police officers who help direct traffic around the school.
A school resource officer assists as availability permits.
Are students involved in any arrival or dismissal process (i.e. student safety patrol)? Yes, we have a student safety patrol. No, we do not have a student safety patrol.
3E. Parent Attitudes towards walking and biking.
Reasons for not allowing children to walk or bicycle to school:
Weather or Climate
Distance
Violence or Crime
Safety of Intersections & Crossings
Amount of Traffic Along Route.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
16
Parents commented and shared the following concerns: the volume of traffic on Blue Avenue in the mornings, cars do not yield to students in crosswalks, distance students would have to walk to school.
City and school official commented that students to do use the crosswalk at Blue and Forest.
3F. Safety Issues and Concerns.
Relevant traffic crashes.
There were 31 bicycle or pedestrian related crashes within 2 miles of the school (from 2011‐2013). The crashes resulted in 22 injuries and 1 fatality. The number of crashes that involved bicycles was 15. The number of crashes that involved pedestrians was 16.
3G. Walking and bicycling encouragement activities at the school. Identify and describe
activities at your school that support or encourage walking and bicycling.
Activity How it encourages walking or bicycling (1‐3 sentences)
Currently, there are no walking or bicycling encouragement activities in place.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
17
Top 5 Issues impacting student ability to safely walk or bicycle to your school. John McIntire Elementary
Issue/Description
1. Issue: Forty percent of students live within one mile of the school and many parents are not comfortable letting their children walk this far (or farther) to get to school. This, in turn, means that many students do not know proper walking and bicycling behaviors.
2. Issue: Parents do not feel children should walk or bicycle to school during the winter months. In addition there are concerns about sidewalks along walking and bicycling routes not being cleared, posing a safety hazard.
3. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the speeds of traffic along the routes they would take.
4. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the amount of traffic along the routes they would take.
5. Issue: Parents are concerned about how safe it is for their children to walk along some of the routes to school because they feel some of the roadway crossings are unsafe.
National Road Elementary
Issue/Description
1. Issue: More than two‐thirds (66%) of students live within one mile of the school and many parents are not comfortable letting their children walk this far (or farther) to get to school. This, in turn, means that many students do not know proper walking and bicycling behaviors. The other issue is the school’s location on Route 40.
2. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the amount of traffic along the routes they would take.
3. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the speeds of traffic along the routes they would take.
4. Issue: Parents do not feel children should walk or bicycle to school during the winter months. In addition there are concerns about sidewalks along walking and bicycling routes not being cleared, posing a safety hazard.
5. Issue: Parents are concerned about how safe it is for their children to walk along some of the routes to school because they feel some of the roadway crossings are unsafe.
SECTION 4: KEY ISSUES IMPACTING SAFE WALKING AND BICYCLING TO SCHOOL
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
18
Zane Grey Elementary
Issue/Description
1. Issue: Parents are concerned about how safe it is for their children to walk along some of the routes to school because of general concerns about violence and crime.
2. Issue: More than half (57%) of students live within one mile of the school and many parents are not comfortable letting their children walk this far (or farther) to get to school. This, in turn, means that many students do not know proper walking and bicycling behaviors.
3. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the amount of traffic along the routes they would take.
4. Issue: Parents do not feel children should walk or bicycle to school during the winter months. In addition there are concerns about sidewalks along walking and bicycling routes not being cleared, posing a safety hazard.
5. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the speeds of traffic along the routes they would take.
Zanesville Middle School
Issue/Description
1. Issue: Parents do not feel children should walk or bicycle to school during the winter months. In addition there are concerns about sidewalks along walking and bicycling routes not being cleared, posing a safety hazard.
2. Issue: Nearly a quarter of students (22%) live within one mile of the school and many parents are not comfortable letting their children walk this far (or farther) to get to school. This, in turn, means that many students do not know proper walking and bicycling behaviors.
3. Issue: Parents are concerned about how safe it is for their children to walk along some of the routes to school because of general concerns about violence and crime.
4. Issue: Parents are concerned about how safe it is for their children to walk along some of the routes to school because they feel some of the roadway crossings are unsafe.
5. Issue: A number of parents don’t want to let their children walk to school because of the amount of traffic along the routes they would take.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
19
5A. Non‐infrastructure Countermeasure Recommendations For each “E”, list and describe strategies that your team has identified. In 1‐2 sentences, explain the “need” or Issue, then briefly describe the countermeasure
EDUCATION COUNTERMEASURES
EDUCATION
Issue Countermeasure
Because children currently don’t bike, they are unaware of safe walking and bicycling behaviors.
Promote Safety Town program for all incoming kindergarten students and work with United Way to offer the program at additional times that are more convenient to working families (for example, after work or over the weekend).
Because children currently don’t bike, they are unaware of proper biking behaviors.
Create a Bike Rodeo program targeting 2nd and 3rd graders.
Parents don’t want their children walking or biking to school unsupervised.
Work with parents and educators to start a Walking School Bus program (through ODOT).
Because children currently don’t bike, they are unaware of proper biking behaviors.
Utilize ODOT’s “Every Move You Make, Make It Safe” campaign to educate students (and parents) about the proper ways to walk and bicycle to school, as well as the benefits of doing so.
Parents don’t want their children walking or biking to school unsupervised.
Host a SRTS Meeting to inform parents/ neighbors/etc. about the goals of the SRTS program.
Because children currently don’t walk or bike, they are unaware of safe walking and bicycling behaviors.
Work with Zanesville Police Department to add bicycle and pedestrian safety into their presentations at elementary schools.
Medium and long term strategies (those that your team will undertake beyond 12 months): 1. Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle education activities into the elementary school
curriculum. 2. Continue to offer and promote Safety Town and Bike Rodeo programs to students –
kindergarten for Safety Town, 2nd and 3rd grades for Bike Rodeo.
SECTION 5: RECOMMENDED SRTS COUNTERMEASURES
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
20
ENCOURAGEMENT COUNTERMEASURES
ENCOURAGEMENT
Issue Countermeasure
Parents don’t want their children walking or biking to school unsupervised.
Start a Walking School Bus program.
Parents don’t want their children walking or biking to school unsupervised.
Participate in Walk and Bike to School Days.
Parents feel their children live far from school, so they do not encourage walking or bicycling to school.
Develop mileage clubs which create competition between classes, grade levels, and/or schools based on how far they have walked or bicycled.
Medium and long term strategies: 1. Continue to participate in Walk and Bike to School events. 2. Continue mileage club competitions and develop additional contests for students to
participate in that offer prizes to students (such as new bike helmets).
ENFORCEMENT COUNTERMEASURES
ENFORCEMENT
Issue Countermeasure
Parents are concerned with speeding along the routes to school.
Enforce School Zone speed limits at all schools. Consider adding speed cameras to enforce School Zone speed limits.
Lack of adult crossing guards. Create adult crossing guard program. Allocate funds collected from school zone speeding enforcement to support the program.
Expand and enhance student safety patrol program.
Work with AAA Ohio Auto Club to provide additional training and equipment to student safety patrol members.
Medium and long term strategies: 1. Send crossing guard representative(s) to ODOT’s Adult School Crossing Guard
Training Program and expand the program. 2. Continue recruiting and training student safety patrol members, in partnership with
AAA Ohio Auto Club.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
21
EVALUATION COUNTERMEASURES
EVALUATION
Issue Countermeasure
Follow‐up on SRTS program effectiveness. Conduct Parent Surveys annually to track the program.
Follow‐up on SRTS program effectiveness. Conduct Student Travel Tallies annually to track the program.
Medium and long term strategies: 1. Conduct Student Travel Tallies seasonally (fall / winter / spring) to see when encouragement techniques should be further employed. 2. Review district and school busing policies to ensure they continue to encourage walking and bicycling to school.
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
22
5B. 12‐Month SRTS Non‐Infrastructure Activity Calendar.
Non‐Infrastructure Countermeasure
Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2015
Sep 2015
Oct 2015
Nov 2015
Dec 2015
Jan 2016
Feb 2016
Mar 2016
Apr 2016
May 2016
Promote Safety City program. PLAN
Lead: Beverly Guinsler, Ron Denton, Steve Foreman, Education
IMPLEMENT
Create Bike Rodeo program. PLAN
Lead: Fred Buck, Education IMPLEMENT
Attend ODOT’s Walking School Bus training.
PLAN
Lead: Tony Coury, Fred Buck, Ron Denton, Education
IMPLEMENT
Utilize ODOT’s “Every Move You Make, Make It Safe” campaign.
PLAN
Lead: Ron Denton, Steve Foreman, Education
IMPLEMENT
Host informational SRTS meeting.
PLAN
Lead: Steve Foreman, Education IMPLEMENT
Add bicycle and pedestrian safety into Police Department’s presentations at elementary schools.
PLAN
Lead: Tony Coury, Education
Start Walking School Bus program. PLAN
Lead: Steve Foreman, Fred Buck, Encouragement
IMPLEMENT
Participate in Walk and Bike to School Days.
PLAN
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
23
Non‐Infrastructure Countermeasure
Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2015
Sep 2015
Oct 2015
Nov 2015
Dec 2015
Jan 2016
Feb 2016
Mar 2016
Apr 2016
May 2016
Lead: Steve Foreman, Sandy Gentry, Tim Arnold, Encouragement
IMPLEMENT
Develop mileage clubs.
PLAN
Lead: Beverly Guinsler, Ron Denton, Steve Foreman, Encouragement
IMPLEMENT
Enforce School Zone speed limits.
PLAN
Lead: Tony Coury, Enforcement; Chip Saunders and Craig Stemm, Engineering
IMPLEMENT
Create adult crossing guard program.
PLAN
Lead: Tony Coury, Fred Buck, Steve Foreman, Enforcement
IMPLEMENT
Attend ODOT Adult Crossing Guard training.
PLAN
Lead: Tony Coury, Fred Buck, Steve Foreman, Enforcement
IMPLEMENT
Enhance and expand Student Safety Patrol program.
PLAN
Lead: Ron Denton, Steve Foreman, Enforcement
IMPLEMENT
Conduct Parent Surveys annually.
PLAN
Lead: Fred Buck, Evaluation IMPLEMENT
Conduct Student Travel Tallies annually.
PLAN
Lead: Fred Buck, Evaluation IMPLEMENT
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
24
5A. Infrastructure Countermeasure Recommendations
Total estimated cost for recommended infrastructure countermeasures (not including maintenance related activities): $ 2,705,300
Note that it is likely that some of the proposed countermeasures may require the acquisition of additional right of way. Right of way costs have been included in the estimates where applicable.
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
1 Intersection of Roosevelt Avenue and Western Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings. Add new ladder style crosswalk across the south leg of Western Avenue. Three new ADA compliant curb ramps will be needed at this intersection. Install new crosswalk signage.
Short Term
High (6%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($10,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
1 Intersection of Roosevelt Avenue and Western Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Convert intersection to four‐way stop control due to unusual intersection alignment and inadequate visibility of crosswalks.
Short Term
High (6%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($3,500)
City of Zanesville
2 Roosevelt Avenue (McIntire)
Amount of Traffic Along Route
Construct sidewalk on the south side of the street from Western Avenue toward the east to existing sidewalk terminus (approx. 80 feet).
Short Term
High (5%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($21,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
3 McIntire Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Restrict on‐street parking on the north side of McIntire Avenue near Western Avenue to improve crosswalk visibility and to alleviate some of the congestion that occurs near the crosswalks.
Short Term
High (31%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($2,000)
City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
25
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
3 Intersection of McIntire Avenue and Western Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Convert intersection to three‐way stop control due to unusual intersection alignment and inadequate visibility of crosswalks. Alternatively, the existing crosswalk across the west leg of McIntire Avenue could be relocated to the east leg of McIntire Avenue.
Short Term
High (31%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($5,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
3 Intersection of McIntire Avenue and Western Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings. Two new ADA compliant curb ramps will be needed at this intersection. Install new crosswalk signage.
Short Term
High (31%)
City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
Low ($6,800)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
N/A McIntire Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue (McIntire)
Speed of Traffic Along Route
Install new school zone signage to be in compliance with OMUTCD standards.
Short Term
High (77%)
City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
Low ($4,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
4 McIntire Avenue (McIntire)
Amount of Traffic Along Route
Improve the infrastructure around the empty lot in the northwest corner of the intersection of Blue Avenue and McIntire Avenue for use as a remote drop off and pick up location, once the projected use as an outdoor classroom is implemented.
Medium Term
High (33%)
Zanesville City Schools
High ($325,000)
Zanesville City Schools
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
26
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
5 Intersection of Roosevelt Avenue and Blue Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Reconstruct sidewalk on both sides of Roosevelt Avenue near Blue Avenue to remove the existing steps.
Short Term
Medium (4%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($54,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
5 Intersection of Roosevelt Avenue and Blue Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Construct ADA compliant curb ramps at the ends of the existing crosswalk.
Short Term
Medium (4%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($3,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
6 Intersection of Blue Avenue and I‐70 Westbound Ramps (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install countdown pedestrian signals for crossings across the exit and entrance ramps. Install ladder style crosswalk markings for both crosswalks. Install four new ADA compliant curb ramps at the ends of each crosswalk.
Short Term
High (4%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($33,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
7 Intersection of State Street and Jackson Street (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals and detectors. It is likely that these improvements will require the entire traffic signal to be rebuilt.
Medium Term
High (3%)
City of Zanesville
High ($167,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / OPWC
8 Intersection of Jackson Street and Liberty Street (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install ADA compliant curb ramps on each of the four corners of this intersection.
Short Term
Medium (1%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($9,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
9 Intersection of Blue Avenue and McIntire Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals.
Short Term
High (33%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($9,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
27
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
9 Intersection of Blue Avenue and McIntire Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings. Up to seven (7) new ADA compliant curb ramps should be installed with the new crosswalk markings.
Short Term
High (33%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($17,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
10 Intersection of Blue Avenue and Adair Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals. Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings.
Short Term
High (26%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($17,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
11 Intersection of Maple Avenue and Adair Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings.
Short Term
High (19%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($10,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
12 Intersection of Linden Avenue and Adair Avenue (McIntire)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings. Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals.
Short Term
High (2%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($36,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
13 Sidewalk connection between Troon Crossing subdivision and National Road Elementary School
Missing Sidewalk Connections
Construct sidewalk from the subdivision to the school. Sidewalk would most likely connect on the north side of the Troon Crossing clubhouse. Alignment to be selected such that design criteria can be met as closely as possible, given existing grades.
Medium Term
High (9%)
Zanesville City Schools
High ($200,000)
SRTS / Zanesville City Schools / Private Funding
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
28
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
14 Parent drop‐off loop at National Road Elementary School
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Establish pedestrian crosswalk with ladder style crosswalk markings, ADA compliant curb ramps, and crosswalk signage to allow students to cross drop‐off loop. Fence should be installed along the east side of the drop‐off loop to encourage students to cross at the desired location.
Short Term
High (15%)
Zanesville City Schools
Low ($16,000)
SRTS / Zanesville City Schools
15 US‐40 adjacent to National Road Elementary School
Speed of Traffic Along Route
Install school zone signage, including school speed limit flashing beacons, per OMUTCD requirements.
Short Term
High (15%)
Zanesville City Schools / ODOT
Medium ($22,000)
SRTS / Zanesville City Schools / ODOT
16 Intersection of Pine Street and Eppley Avenue (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install ladder style crosswalk markings for each crosswalk. Install ADA compliant curb ramps on all four corners. Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals for all crossings at intersection. It is likely that the signal improvements will require the entire traffic signal to be rebuilt.
Medium Term
High (7%)
City of Zanesville
High ($169,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
17 Intersection of Eppley Avenue and Superior Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings across Eppley Avenue with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install new crosswalk signage for this crossing. Two new ADA compliant curb ramps will be needed as well.
Short Term
Medium (2%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($12,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
29
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
18 Intersection of Seborn Avenue and Superior Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings across Seborn Avenue with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install new crosswalk signage for this crossing. Two new ADA compliant curb ramps will be needed as well.
Short Term
Medium (4%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($17,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
19 Intersection of Fess Avenue and Superior Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install new ladder style crosswalk markings, signage, and ADA compliant curb ramps across Fess Avenue just west of Superior Street. This also requires the construction of approximately 60 feet of sidewalk from the existing northern terminus along Superior Street to the parking lot driveway.
Short Term
High (8%)
City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
Medium ($22,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / Zanesville City Schools
20 Pine Street at the existing pedestrian signal (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install ladder style crosswalk markings, crosswalk signing, and countdown pedestrian signal heads.
Short Term
High (13%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($5,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
21 Intersection of Pine Street and Pershing Road (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Improve traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signals. Remark existing crosswalks with ladder style crosswalk markings.
Short Term
High (43%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($10,500)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
22 Pershing Road (Zane Grey)
Amount and Speed of Traffic Along Route
Install sidewalk on the south side of the street between Larzelere Avenue and Cabot Drive (approx 660 feet). Additional right of way will likely be needed for this improvement. Due to the close proximity of homes, construction of this sidewalk may not be feasible.
Medium Term
High (32%)
City of Zanesville
High ($375,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / OPWC
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
30
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
23 Pershing Road ‐ Existing crosswalk located approximately 480 feet east of Pine Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install ladder style crosswalk markings. Install updated school crosswalk signing with pedestrian activated rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB's)
Short Term
High (23%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($21,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
24 Intersection of Pershing Road and Woodlawn Avenue (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Install ladder style crosswalk markings across the north leg of Woodlawn Avenue. Install ADA compliant curb ramps at each end of the crosswalk. Construct sidewalk along the north side of Pershing Road toward the west to the existing sidewalk terminus (approx 100 feet). The added sidewalk also requires the relocation of the existing railroad signals and a nearby utility pole.
Medium Term
High (15%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($107,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
25 Intersection of Putnam Avenue and Harrison Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install crosswalk signing facing the Putnam Avenue approaches. Determine if the traffic signal meets warrants. If so, upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. It is likely that the traffic signal will need to be rebuilt in order to accommodate the new pedestrian signals.
Medium Term
High (3%)
City of Zanesville
High ($168,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
31
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
26 Woodlawn Avenue (Zane Grey)
Amount and Speed of Traffic Along Route
Maintain existing sidewalk between Muskingum Avenue and Pershing Road. Portions of sidewalk are in poor condition or have been covered by weeds and grass over time.
Short Term
Medium (15%)
City of Zanesville
TBD City of Zanesville
27 Intersection of Putnam Avenue and Pierce Street (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install crosswalk signing facing the Putnam Avenue approaches. Determine if the traffic signal meets warrants. If so, upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. It is likely that the traffic signal will need to be rebuilt in order to accommodate the new pedestrian signals.
Medium Term
High (7%)
City of Zanesville
High ($163,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
28 Putnam Avenue (Zane Grey)
Amount and Speed of Traffic Along Route
Maintain existing sidewalk between Muskingum Avenue and Cleveland Avenue. Portions of sidewalk are in poor condition or have been covered by weeds and grass over time.
Short Term
Medium (4%)
City of Zanesville
TBD City of Zanesville
29 Intersection of Putnam Avenue and Maysville Avenue (Zane Grey)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. It is likely that the traffic signal will need to be rebuilt in order to accommodate the new pedestrian signals.
Medium Term
High (3%)
City of Zanesville
High ($178,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
32
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
30 Intersection of Blue Avenue and Locust Avenue (Zanesville Middle)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install four ADA compliant curb ramps at the ends of the crosswalks. Install updated school crosswalk signing with pedestrian activated rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB's) for the Blue Avenue crossing.
Short Term
High (9%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($55,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
31 Blue Avenue pedestrian crossing located approx 100 feet north of Fairmont Avenue (Zanesville Middle)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install two ADA compliant curb ramps at the ends of the crosswalk. Install updated school crosswalk signing with pedestrian activated rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB's).
Short Term
High (10%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($30,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
32 Intersection of Maple Avenue and Locust Avenue (Zanesville Middle)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. Update pedestrian clearance times to ensure they are in compliance with current standards.
Short Term
High (2%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($10,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
33 Intersection of Maple Avenue and Dresden Road (Zanesville Middle)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. Check pedestrian signal phasing to ensure adequate protection from vehicular traffic.
Short Term
High (3%)
City of Zanesville
Low ($10,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
33
Map ID
Location Issue Countermeasure Timeframe Priority (% Impacted)
Jurisdiction Responsible
Estimated Cost
Possible Funding Source
Status
34 Intersection of Linden Avenue and Sheridan Street (Zanesville Middle)
Safety of Intersections and Crossings
Replace existing crosswalk markings with ladder style crosswalk markings. Install crosswalk signing facing the Linden Avenue approaches. Determine if the traffic signal meets warrants. If so, upgrade traffic signal to include countdown pedestrian signal heads. It is likely that the traffic signal will need to be rebuilt in order to accommodate the new pedestrian signals.
Medium Term
High (1%)
City of Zanesville
High ($163,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
35 Jacobs Street (Zanesville Middle)
Amount and Speed of Traffic Along Route
Construct sidewalk on one side of the street between Blue Avenue and Hazel Avenue (approx 700 feet).
Medium Term
Medium (5%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($139,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville / OPWC
N/A School speed zones at each of the schools
Speed of Traffic Along Route
Install speed display driver feedback signs in each of the school speed zones. The number of signs needed for each school is as follows: John McIntire ‐ 2; National Road ‐ 2; Zane Grey ‐ 4; Zanesville Middle ‐ 2.
Short Term
Medium (68%)
City of Zanesville
Medium ($78,000)
SRTS / City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
34
A public meeting to discuss the Zanesville STP was held on January 27, 2015 at Zanesville City Hall. Key feedback from that meeting is outlined below; materials from the meeting are included in Appendix C.
Public Input Process:
Date: January 27, 2015
Target Audience: Parents, residents, school and city staff
Key Input Received: • Could you give some examples of non‐infrastructure countermeasures? Examples of education, encouragement, enforcement and evaluation countermeasures were given. •After the plan is approved, can the City apply for up to $400,000 in infrastructure projects? Yes, that is correct. • What is the timeline for spending the grant dollars? Communities will be notified in late May that they received the funding. Non‐infrastructure funds can be used immediately. Current infrastructure projects are being designed and built for the 2017‐18 budget cycle, so it would likely be after that time. • Can we use in‐kind services for some of the work to stretch project dollars? Local support increases points awarded in the funding cycle. The consultant team recommended checking with local ODOT SRTS Coordinator Randy Comisford to clarify use of in‐kind labor. • In terms of the proposed remote drop off locations, can SRTS dollars be used to acquire property to create a remote drop off? The consultant team said to check with ODOT to see if SRTS dollars can be used for land acquisition for remote drop off. Most remote drop off programs include a partnership with a local business, church or other organization that gives the school permission to use the property for student drop off and pick up. • Could you please explain the 80/20 program funding? When Congress moved the Safe Routes program to the federal Transportation Alternatives program, it became an 80/20 funded program. However, ODOT is currently matching the 20% local requirement in the federal program. This means that SRTS projects in Ohio are still 100% funded and a local match is not required.
SECTION 6: PUBLIC INPUT
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
35
Administrators and parents of students in Zanesville City Schools and at the City of Zanesville are joining together to improve safety and encourage more students to walk and bicycle to school. By implementing our Safe Routes to School Travel Plan, it is the vision of the Zanesville City Schools SRTS Planning Team to:
• Increase the number of students who walk and bicycle to school by making it safer for them. The school travel plan will result in a healthier school‐age population and students developing life‐long healthy habits.
The undersigned are fully supportive of the Zanesville City Schools’ Safe Routes to School Travel Plan and program, and pledge to support their efforts and provide resources as appropriate.
SECTION 7: FINAL PLAN – ENDORSEMENT
Signature
Terry Martin, Superintendent, Zanesville City Schools
Signature
Jeff Tilton Mayor, City of Zanesville
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
The Zanesville City School District is located in Muskingum County. The prevalence of overweight or obese 3rd graders in the county is 30‐39% (based on the Ohio Department of Health’s A Report on the Body Mass Index of Ohio’s Third Graders 2004–2010).
APPENDIX A: OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3RD GRADE BMI REPORT
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
APPENDIX B: MAPPING
John McIntire Elem - Zanesville City Schools - Muskingum Co
Total Enrollment = 736
k
S R EHL RD
A
R
CHER LN
AD
AM
S L
N
HIG
HL
AN
D R
D
MUSSELMAN RD
WHEELING AVE
NE
IL A
VE
CO
A L RU N RD
TR 1025
GRE IF R
D
E MAIN ST
W R
AY
DR
BANK STP
AR
RY
DR
LO
OK
OU
T D
R
BUSS EMER LN
TR 1027
IVY DR
N SAMUEL DR
DIX
ON
BLV
D
WALLWORK AVE
ROWAN ST
QUINCY RD
NE
WA
RK
RD
ED
RD
FERNBANK RD
TR 1026
E R
AY
DR
KIR
K DR
E N
EW
MA
N S
T
CR
ES
TW
AY
DR
CHEWELAH AVE
RO
AR
K R
D
BORDER ST
MO
NT
GO
ME
RY
AV
E
CA
RM
EN
DR
FALLS LN
WILD
WO
OD
CIR
MILITARY RD (CR-146)
LICKING RD (C
R-41
4)
LIN
DE
N A
VE
(C
R-3
)
RIDGE RD (CR-3 4)
DR
ES
DE
N R
D (
CR
-2)
COOPERMILL RD (CR-71)
S P
INE
ST
(C
R- 2
00
4)
N L
IND
EN
AV
E (C
R-3
)
PERSHING RD (CR-71)
BL
UE
AV
E (
CR
-20
01
)
RIDGE A
VE (CR-34)
BR
I GH
TO
N B
LV
D (
CR
- 20
03
)
TAYLOR ST (CR-2000)
DR
YD
EN
RD
(C
R-2
008)
NATIONAL RD (CR-420)
MO
XA
HA
LA
AV
E (
CR
-6)
ADAMSVIL
LE
RD (C
R-694)N
EW
AR
K R
D (
CR
-20
11
)
MUSKINGUM AVE (CR-2010)
N S
TATE
ST (C
R-2
002)
N 6
TH
ST
(C
R- 2
02
4)
LU
CK
AV
E (
CR
-20
09
)
N 4
TH
ST
(C
R-2
01
9)
SOUTH ST (CR-2017)
N 5
TH
ST
(C
R-2
02
0)
ZANE ST (C
R-2021)
TAYLOR ST (CR-2000)
SR
-93
NEWARK RD
MA
PL
E A
VE
SR
-666
LE
WIS
DR
WA
YN
E A
VE
S HARON AVE
ADAIR AVE
ADAIR AVE
US-40
GREENWOOD AVE
PU
TN
AM
AV
E���70
���70
tu40
93
666
146
60
60
146
60
q
k School
Students
Roads by Type
Interstate Route
US Route
State Route
Freeway Ramp
County Roads
Township Roads
Radius (Miles)
0.25
0.5
1.0
2.0
City Boundary
County Boundary
State Boundary
k
Date: 4/7/2014
0 1,500 3,000 4,500750Feet
0 4 8 16 24Minutes to Walk
National Road Elem - Zanesville City Schools - Muskingum Co
Total Enrollment = 448
n
CLAY PIKE
GRIEVES LN
LECT
RICLN
OSBO
R NR D
BATE MAN RD
LISA L N
LOVERS LN
BOGGS RD
FULK
ERSO
N RD
COALRU
N RD
BUNT
ING
DR
QUINN LN
BRYAN DR
I N NOVATIONWAY
DOWNING DR
NEWP
ORT D
R
EAST POINT E DR
B ROOKS IDE DR
SUNRAY PL
OLD WHEELING RD
WEDGEWOOD DR
MICHELLE LN
PLEZZA DR
EAST
WOOD
BLV
D
BONNAIR DR
KING
ARTH
UR C
T
GREE
NGOLD DR
MAIN STLIT
TLE J
OHN D
R
LOUI
SE D
R
SAMARA LN
CRESTMONT DR
DOZER RD
OLIVIA'S WAY
MOOR
ES LN
CODY DR
STARDUST CIRCLAY PIKE
BOGGS RD (CR-108)
CLAY PIKE RD (CR-5)
HICK
S RD
(CR-
52)
OLD WHEELING RD (CR-42)
JACK
SON
RD(CR-19
1)
SONO
RA R
D (C
R-52
)
S PLEASANT GROVE RD (CR-5)
ADAMSVILLE RD (CR-694)
MILLERS LN (CR-193)SR
-93
CHANDLER SVILLE RD
US-22 §̈¦70
§̈¦70
£¤22
93
146
q
n SchoolStudents
Roads by TypeInterstate RouteUS RouteState RouteFreeway RampCounty RoadsTownship Roads
Radius (Miles)0.250.51.02.0City BoundaryCounty BoundaryState Boundary
n
Date: 2/23/2015
0 1,400 2,800 4,200700Feet
0 4 8 16 24Minutes to Walk
Zane Grey Elem - Zanesville City Schools - Muskingum Co
Total Enrollment = 782
k
S R EHL RD
LU
BY
LN
A
R
CHER LN
SH
AW
RD GREENHOUSE RD
FR
ICK
DR
ELL
EN
DR
WHEELING AVE
GRAN CLIFF RD
CL
AY
ST
BEECHROCK D R
BAM LN
LONG
SH
ORE L N
BO
AT
DO
CK
RD
E MAIN ST
JU
NE
PK
WY
PAULS LN
MAIN ST
WILLOW DR
WALTER DR
BANK ST
WA
LN
UT D
R
HA
ZE
L A
VE
POPLAR DR
DOWNARD RD
HALLEY D
R
JONES ST GRANDVIEW AVEG
LE
NN CIR
ZEL LA DR
QUINCY RD
RU
SS
EL
L D
R
DADS RD
BROADVUE CIR
VAN SANT ST
ST
AL
D
ER DR
WO
OD
Y L
N
BE
NJA
MIN
AV
E
KIR
K DR
CHEWELAH AVE
BORDER ST
KNOX R
D
CIN
EM
A D
R
STEPHEN
S LN
OVERLOOK DR
RAINDROP LN
EDWARD ST
RIC
HW
OO
D D
R
E MAIN ST
PO
TT
S L
N (
CR
-14
3)
S P
INE
ST
(C
R- 2
00
4)
RIDGE RD (CR-34 )
MO
XA
HA
LA
AV
E (
CR
-6)
COOPERMILL RD ( CR-71)
OL
D R
IVE
R R
D (C
R-6
)
DIETZ RD (CR-72)
PERSHING RD (CR-71)
RIDGE AVE (C
R-34)
LIN
DE
N A
VE
(C
R-3
)
BR
I GH
TO
N B
LV
D (
CR
- 20
03
)
DR
YD
EN
RD
(C
R-2
008)
PINKERTON RD (CR-125)
N D
IET
Z R
D (
CR
-72
)
PU
TN
AM
ST
(C
R-2
00
7)
MUSKIN
GUM AVE (CR-2010)
N S
TATE S
T (C
R-2
002
)
N 6
TH
ST
(C
R- 2
02
4)
LU
CK
AV
E (
CR
-20
09
)
N 4
TH
ST
(C
R-2
01
9)
SOUTH ST (CR-2017)
N 5
TH
ST
(C
R-2
02
0)
ZANE ST (CR-2021)
SR
-93
S R
IVE
R R
DW
AY
NE
AV
E
SR-719
S HARON AVE
U S-40 US-2
2
MA
YS
VIL
LE
AV
E
GREENWOOD AVE
PU
TN
AM
AV
E
US-22
���70
���70
tu40
tu22
93
60
719
146
666
555
60
60
60
q
k School
Students
Roads by Type
Interstate Route
US Route
State Route
Freeway Ramp
County Roads
Township Roads
Radius (Miles)
0.25
0.5
1.0
2.0
City Boundary
County Boundary
State Boundary
k
Date: 4/7/2014
0 1,500 3,000 4,500750Feet
0 4 8 16 24Minutes to Walk
Zanesville Middle - Zanesville City Schools - Muskingum Co
Total Enrollment = 500
k
HAL E RD
S R EHL RD
AD
AM
S L
N
HIG
HL
AN
D R
D
MUSSELMAN RD
LA
NG
AN
LN
WHEELING AVE
C OAL R UN RD
E HIGHLAND DRGARDEN RD
NE
IL A
VE
DA
LE
RD
GROVE RDBOWERS LN
TR 1025
GRE IF R
D
RIV
ER
SID
E A
IRP
OR
T D
R
NOB HILL RD
E MAIN ST
HIL
LTO
P R
D
ORCHARD HILL RD
W R
AY
DR
LO
OK
OU
T D
R
WALLWORK AVE
BUSS EMER LN
TR 1027
WIN
DIN
G W
AY
PARK AVE
MOORE AVE
N SAMUEL DR
DIX
ON
BLV
D
KADIE LN
BROADVIEW AVE
ROWAN ST
QUINCY RD
PU
RE
CO
UN
TR
Y D
R
W HIGHLAND DR
NE
WA
RK
RD
SN
YD
ER
AV
E
ED
RD
FERNBANK RD
TR 1026
E R
AY
DR
E N
EW
MA
N S
T
CR
ES
TW
AY
DR
RO
AR
K R
D
BORDER ST
MO
NT
GO
ME
RY
AV
E
KIRK DR
CA
RM
EN
DR
W ILDW
OO
D C
IR
MILITARY RD (CR-146)
LICKING RD
(CR
-414)
DR
ES
DE
N R
D (
CR
-2)
LIN
DE
N A
VE
(C
R-3
)
RIDGE RD (CR-3 4)
N L
IND
EN
AVE
(C
R-3
)
BL
UE
AV
E (
CR
-20
01
)
RIDGE AVE (C
R-34)
TAYLOR ST (CR-2000)
ADAM
SV
IL
LE RD (CR-694 )
NO
RT
H R
IVE
R R
D (
CR
-3)
NATIONAL RD (CR-420)
S P
INE
ST
(C
R- 2
00
4)
NE
WA
RK
RD
(C
R-2
011
)
MUSKINGUM
AVE (CR-2010)
N S
TATE
ST (C
R-2
002
)
N 6
TH
ST
(C
R- 2
02
4)
LU
CK
AV
E (
CR
-20
09
)
N 4
TH
ST
(C
R-2
01
9)
N 5
TH
ST
(C
R-2
02
0)
SOUTH ST (CR-2017)
ZANE ST (CR-2021)
TAYLOR ST (CR-2000)
NE
WA
RK
RD
MA
PL
E A
VE
SR
-93
SR
-666
LE
WIS
DR
S HARON AVE
ADAIR AVE
ADAIR AVE
U S-40
GREENWOOD AVE US-22
���70���70
tu40
tu22
93
666
146
60
60
60
146
q
k School
Students
Roads by Type
Interstate Route
US Route
State Route
Freeway Ramp
County Roads
Township Roads
Radius (Miles)
0.25
0.5
1.0
2.0
City Boundary
County Boundary
State Boundary
k
Date: 4/7/2014
0 1,500 3,000 4,500750Feet
0 4 8 16 24Minutes to Walk
| Ohio’s Safe Routes to School Travel Plan Tem
plate | w
ww.dot.state.oh.us/saferoutes
APPENDIX C: PUBLIC MEETING MATERIALS
FeedbackNeededonSchoolTravelPlanYou’reinvitedtoapublicmeetingtolearnaboutthenewSafeRoutestoSchoolprogramatZanesvilleCitySchoolsinpartnershipwiththeCityofZanesville,andtoreviewthedraftSchoolTravelPlancreatedbyalocalteamofcommunityandschoolrepresentatives.JoinusonTuesday,January27at5pminCouncilChambers,atZanesvilleCityHall,401MarketStreet.Learnmore—www.walk.ohio.govwww.saferoutesinfo.org
ZanesvilleCitySchoolsSRTSPublicMeeting
January27,2015Agenda
1. Introductions
2. WhatisSafeRoutestoSchool?
3. DevelopingtheSchoolTravelPlan
4. OverviewoftheSchoolTravelPlan
5. MeetingParticipantComments
6. NextSteps,AdjourntheMeeting
OpencommentperioduntilMonday,February2Sendcommentsto: StephanieTresso,SRTSConsultant [email protected]
11/14/11
1
City of ZanesvilleSafe Routes to School
School Travel Plan
Public Meeting – January 27, 2015
Agenda
• What is Safe Routes to School?
• Developing the School Travel Plan
• Overview of the Zanesville School Travel Plan
• Questions
• Next Steps
11/14/11
2
Safe Routes to School
• International movement to promote active transportation
• Highway Transportation Bill since 2004
• Focuses on barriers/improvements to walking and biking
– Within 2 miles of any school (K‐8 Students)
• Funds for Infrastructure and Non‐Infrastructure Projects
• Includes five components (5 E’s)
– Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Engineering, and Evaluation
Safe Routes to School
• Managed by ODOT– Julie Walcoff – Program Manager (District
Managers in all 12 ODOT Districts)– Goal: Encourage more students to
walk/bike and make walking/biking routes safer for all users
• School Travel Plan Process– Documentation of a communities’
intentions related to active transportation
– ODOT assists communities – STP is a requirement for further funding
requests• Infrastructure
– $Up to 400,000
• Non‐Infrastructure– Up to $15,000 (1 to 10 schools)– Up to $30,000 (11 to 25 schools)– Up to $60,000 (26 or more schools)
11/14/11
3
School Travel Plan Development
• 3 Key Items
– Where are the kids coming from?
– What travel mode are they using?
– And why?
Zanesville School Travel Plan
• STP Process began in Fall 2014• Local Group led by:
– City and School District– Vision: It is the vision of the Zanesville SRTS planning team to:
increase the number of students who walk and bicycle to school by making it safer for them. The school travel plan will result in a healthier school‐age population and students developing life‐long healthy habits.
• STP Tasks– Parent Surveys/Travel Tallies
• Current School Travel Information (How children get to/from school?)• Issues
– Audit of Existing Conditions (January 15, 2015)– Recommended Solutions and Countermeasures
• Infrastructure and Non‐Infrastructure
11/14/11
4
Zanesville School Travel Plan
Primary Concerns:
• Distance
• Weather related issues
• Amount and speed of traffic
• Safety of intersections and crossings
• Crime
Zanesville School Travel Plan
Infrastructure Countermeasures:
• Sidewalk
• Improved crosswalks
• Pedestrian improvements at traffic signals
• Improved school zone signing and radar speed signs
• Remote drop‐off/pick‐up and parking at McIntire
11/14/11
5
Zanesville School Travel Plan
Non‐infrastructure Countermeasures:• Safety Town• Bike Rodeo• Walking School Bus Training• ODOT’s Every Move You Make campaign• Host Meeting to Inform Parents about SRTS Program Goals• Work with Zanesville Police Department to add bike and ped safety
into their presentations in schools• Walk and Bike to School Days• Mileage Clubs• Speed Enforcement• Create Adult Crossing Guard Program• Work with AAA to provide additional training and equipment to
student safety patrol members• Regular surveys to track progress
Zanesville School Travel Plan
• Next Steps
– Incorporate Public Comments
– Finalize Countermeasures and Mapping
– Endorsements
• Final STP in early February
• Funding Requests due by March 2, 2015
– Both Infrastructure and Non‐Infrastructure
11/14/11
6
Questions?
Mark NoltThe Kleingers Group
[email protected](513) 779‐7851
Stephanie TressoMurphy Epson
[email protected](614) 221‐2885 x15