5
NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al. S.A. Sabbagh 1 , T.E. Evans 2 , L.E. Zakharov 3 , J- W. Ahn 4 , J. Canik 4 , R. Maingi 4 , J.W. Berkery 1 , J.M. Bialek 1 , S. Gerhardt 3 , J-K. Park 3 , Y-S. Park 1 , H. Takahashi 3 , K. Tritz 5 , et al. XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Maryland U New Mexico U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr Hiroshima U HIST Kyushu Tokai U Niigata U Tsukuba U U Tokyo JAERI Ioffe Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching U Quebec NSTX Physics Meeting June 7 th , 2010 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 1 Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University 2 General Atomics 3 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 4 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 5 Johns Hopkins University V1.0

XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

  • Upload
    gerald

  • View
    17

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Supported by. Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Maryland U New Mexico U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr Hiroshima U HIST Kyushu Tokai U - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al.

S.A. Sabbagh1, T.E. Evans2, L.E. Zakharov3, J-W. Ahn4, J. Canik4, R. Maingi4, J.W. Berkery1, J.M. Bialek1, S. Gerhardt3,

J-K. Park3, Y-S. Park1, H. Takahashi3, K. Tritz5, et al.

XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and

collisionality

Supported by

Columbia UComp-X

General AtomicsINEL

Johns Hopkins ULANLLLNL

LodestarMIT

Nova PhotonicsNYU

ORNLPPPL

PSISNL

UC DavisUC Irvine

UCLAUCSD

U MarylandU New Mexico

U RochesterU Washington

U WisconsinCulham Sci Ctr

Hiroshima UHIST

Kyushu Tokai UNiigata U

Tsukuba UU Tokyo

JAERIIoffe Inst

TRINITIKBSI

KAISTENEA, Frascati

CEA, CadaracheIPP, Jülich

IPP, GarchingU Quebec

NSTX Physics MeetingJune 7th, 2010

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

1Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University2General Atomics

3Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory4Oak Ridge National Laboratory

5Johns Hopkins University

V1.0

Page 2: XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al.

Target conditions set-up for XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J,

• Goals/Approach Test expectations ELM stability theory considering changes to edge toroidal

current density, field-aligned thermoelectric current, and collisionality

• 1) Generate target

• 2) Vary TE current connection length at fixed 3D field

• 3) Vary 3D field amplitude

• 4) Vary toroidal current density near the edge

• 5) Vary collisionality with LLD

• Data from last week Completed Step (1), using target from LLD XP1000 (4 shots / 2 good shots)

• intermediate elongation and triangularity successfully re-created using strike point control

• small evidence of ELM activity, dithering, indicating marginal stability of ELMs

• 50 Hz n = 3 field applied to the plasma, yielded ELMing plasma during n = 3 field

• Scrape-off layer currents were measured by the new LLD shunt tiles and Langmuir probe arrays

Page 3: XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al.

• Profiles taken at same time, but had somewhat different Examine further, choose profiles at same

Target configuration reproduced, some changes in profiles

Targetno 3D fieldw/ 3D field

Targetno 3D fieldw/ 3D field

Page 4: XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al.

ELMs generated when 3D field was applied

no 3D fieldw/ 3D field

Page 5: XP1031: MHD/ELM stability dependence on thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality

NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Team Mtg. 6/7/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al.

Scrape-off later currents during ELMs measured by LLD shunt tiles and Langmuir probe array

• Lamgmuir probe current Measured

during ELM generated after application of 3D field

• Similar data taken with LLD shunt tiles