Upload
brandon-dickerson
View
218
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Who is Poor in America?Who is Poor in America?
Dr. Norman R. Cloutier, DirectorUW-Parkside Center for Economic Education
December 3, 2010, ASET Meeting, Miller Park, Milwaukee, WI
Societal Economic GoalsSocietal Economic Goals
Low UnemploymentLow UnemploymentEconomic GrowthEconomic Growth
Low InflationLow InflationEfficiencyEfficiency
EquityEquity
Adam Smith on EquityAdam Smith on Equity
“By necessaries I understand, not only the commodities which are necessary for the support of life, but whatever the custom of the country renders it indecent for creditable people, even of the lowest order, to be without.”
− Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (1776)
“However selfish a man may be, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortunes of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it. We feel pity or compassion when we see the misery of others…” − Adam Smith, paraphrased from the opening
paragraph of Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)
U.S. Poverty Rate U.S. Poverty Rate 1971—20091971—2009
14.3
9.4
25.8
25.343.6 millionpeople
Single mothers increase their chances Single mothers increase their chances of living in poverty 416% relative to of living in poverty 416% relative to
married couples married couples
Living Arrangement 2009 Poverty Rate
Married-couple 5.8%
Female householder, no husband present
29.9%
Male householder, no wife present
16.8%
High school dropouts increase their High school dropouts increase their chances of living in poverty by 529% chances of living in poverty by 529%
relative to a college graduatesrelative to a college graduates
Educational Attainment, Age>25
2008Poverty Rate
College Degree 3.8%
High School Grad 11.6%
< High School 23.9%
Not working increases the chances of living Not working increases the chances of living in poverty 741% relative to those who are in poverty 741% relative to those who are
working full-timeworking full-time
Working StatusAge 16-65
2009Poverty Rate
Full-time, year-round 2.7%
Part time or part year 14.5%
Did not work 22.7%
Measuring PovertyMeasuring Poverty
“. . . you can’t solve a problem until you can measure it.”
“It is not too strong a statement to say that, 45
years after they were developed, the official poverty thresholds are numbers without any valid conceptual basis.”
- Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
- Dr. Rebecca Blank (Brooking Institution), testimony before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support Hearing on Establishing a Modern Poverty Measure Committee, July 17, 2008
What is the official U.S poverty What is the official U.S poverty rate rate actuallyactually measuring? measuring?
A person is in “poverty” if he or she lives in a family that has an income below a poverty threshold.
Calculate your poverty threshold for a family of four, two adults and two children.
How are the official poverty How are the official poverty thresholds determined?thresholds determined?
Mollie Orshanky’s 1963 original measures:At the time, no budgets established except food(food budget) x 3= thresholdAdjusted over time by the CPI-U.
Initially, the terms “poor” and “poverty” were not used in official government statistics.
normative vs. positive language
Problems with the official Problems with the official poverty statistic poverty statistic
No geographic distinctions
The CPI-U overstates inflation
Measured income is pre-tax
In-kind transfers are not counted• Should we count Medicaid and S-CHIP payments as
income?
Items not counted in the official Items not counted in the official poverty statistic, 2002poverty statistic, 2002
Government Program
Average Benefit Within Program
Per
Food stamps $ 2,200 Family
Housing assistance $ 5,400 Family
Medicaid $ 6,000 Family-4
S-CHIP $ 1,000 Child
Energy assistance $ 400 Family
WIC $ 400 Person
TOTAL $15,400
Problems with the official Problems with the official poverty statistic poverty statistic
Should the unit of analysis be the “family” or the “household”?
In 1992, counting household income would have resulted in 1.6 million fewer poor.
Counting all possible sources of income, but using current official thresholds, could decrease measured poverty by 36%.
2007: official=12.5%, adjusted= 7.9%
Threshold ProblemsThreshold Problems
Surveys have indicated that the general public would set thresholds 60%-70% higher than the official level.
In the early-1960s Orshansky assumed families spent 1/3 of the their income on food. Today it is closer to 1/7.
1/3 yields a multiplier of 31/7 yields a multiplier of 14
Threshold ProblemsThreshold Problems
Thresholds should incorporate explicit budgets for clothing, shelter, child care, personal care, transportation, household supplies.
Within region cost-of-living differences?
Equivalence scales
Economic Policy Institute “basic family budgets” • Madison, family of four= $52,019
Should we consider wealth?Should we consider wealth?Characteristics of Ownership in
Poor Family Dwellings1980-1989 2000-2005
Microwave 27% 85%
Dishwasher 18% 31%
Central air conditioning 15% 38%
Washer 60% 64%
Dryer 39% 55%
Television 61% 96%
Computer 4% 38%
Stereo 29% 63%
VCR 25% 76%
Poverty and Material WellbeingPoverty and Material Wellbeing
Supplemental Poverty MeasureSupplemental Poverty Measure
Due for release fall 2011.
Modeled after the 1995 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommendations.
Primus (2006) found in the 1990s:Official rate declined 11.7%.NAS adjusted rate declined 27.1%.
Characteristics of New SPMCharacteristics of New SPM• Calculating the Threshold
Will use “household-type” unit of analysis rather than family.
Establish explicit budgets for food, shelter, clothing, and utilities (FSCU).
• Adjustment for homeownership Allow for geographic differences in housing costs
• Region• Urban vs. Rural
Adjustment factor of 1.20
Characteristics of New SPMCharacteristics of New SPM
• Measuring Available Resources (income) Add:
• All (non-medical) in-kind benefits• Income from household members.• Tax credits (EITC)
Subtract:• Taxes• Work expenses, including childcare• Out-of-pocket medical expenses
Is the New SPM a Measure of Is the New SPM a Measure of Poverty?Poverty?
Establishment of “typical” FSCU budget of the 33rd percentile household.
Relative vs. absolute measure
Consumption-based measure? Material well-being is derived from the consumption of
goods and services, not income per se.Reported consumption tends to be higher than
reported income.