Upload
kenna-prewitt
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Forces are Driving California’s Recovery
Mark Vitner, Managing Director & Senior EconomistNovember 13, 2013
Economic Outlook 2
Key Macroeconomic Trends
A Cloud of Uncertainty Hangs Over
the Economy
Unprecedented changes in fiscal and monetary policy have cast a cloud of uncertainty over economic decision making. The persistence of large budget deficits and new regulations regarding healthcare and financial services have effectively raised the hurdle rate that new investment and hiring decisions must clear in order to be enacted
Economic growth continues to gradually gain
momentum
California’s economy is ahead of the nation in many
ways but other areas are more challenged
Below Trend GDP Growth Bolsters the Case for the New Normal
Real GDP growth has averaged a 2.2 percent pace since the recession ended, which is well below the 3.3 percent pace averaged during the 25 years prior to the Great Recession. The Obama Administration and Fed have worked to close the output gap and bring GDP growth back to its previous trend. The lack of success bolsters the case for the New Normal.
QE Has Boosted Asset Prices But Not Underlying Fundamentals
The Fed’s massive expansion of its balance sheet did a good job of driving interest rates lower and sending the stock market higher. While producing some beneficial effects, higher asset prices have done little to boost income growth. QE has also led to increased speculative activity, with home prices rising even when homeownership is declining.
California’s Recovery is Broadening and Gaining Momentum
Led by strong gains in technology and tourism, California’s recovery has steadily gained momentum. Job growth has decelerated recently and is just keeping pace with the nation. The unemployment rate is trending lower. The gap between the conditions along the coast and the state’s interior has widened, as the recovery in the Central Valley remains slow.
California Maintains a Huge Lead
in Technology
While competition from Texas and Silicon Alley has received a great deal of attention, California’s lead in information technology has widened in recent years. The Bay area remains the innovation hub for mobile devices social media, cloud computing and alternative energy. Manufacturing remains a huge challenge for the state, however, even with tech.
Economic Outlook 3
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
U.S. Real GDP Bars = CAGR Line = Yr/Yr Percent Change
GDP - CAGR: Q3 @ 2.8%
GDP - Yr/Yr Percent Change: Q3 @ 1.6%
Forecast
U.S. GDP
We see economic growth gradually regaining
momentum as the housing recovery takes hold and the
drag from fiscal belt tightening gradually wanes
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook 44
U.S. GDP
The combination of sluggish economic growth and low inflation means that revenue growth is unusually sluggish, which impacts certain parts of the economy
differently
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Nominal GDPReal GDP
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
U.S. Real GDPBars = Compound Annual Rate Line = Yr/Yr % Change
Real GDP: Q3 @ 2.8%
Real GDP: Q3 @ 1.6%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
U.S. Nominal GDPBars = Compound Annual Rate Line = Yr/Yr % Change
Nominal GDP: Q3 @ 4.8%
Nominal GDP: Q3 @ 3.1%
Economic Outlook 5
57%
58%
59%
60%
61%
62%
63%
64%
65%3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
Unemployment v. Employment-Population Ratio16 Years and Over, Seasonally Adjusted
Unemployment Rate: Oct @ 7.3% (Left Axis)
Employment-Population: Oct @ 58.3% (Right Axis - Inverted)
Labor Market Dynamics
The employment-population rate hasn’t improved over
the past four years, despite the fall in the
unemployment rate, suggesting that many job seekers have simply given
up.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook 66
Housing Market Metrics
Despite some recent setbacks, we continue to look for a gradual recovery in homebuilding. Apartments are playing a larger role than in previous building
cycles.
Source: NAR, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Home PricesHousing Starts
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
2.4
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
2.4
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18
Th
ou
san
ds
Housing StartsMillions of Units
Multifamily Starts
Multifamily Forecast
Single-family Starts
Single-family ForecastForecast
62%
63%
64%
65%
66%
67%
68%
69%
70%
-24%
-18%
-12%
-6%
0%
6%
12%
18%
24%
88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
S&P Case-Shiller National Home Price Index vs. Homeownership Rate
National Home Price Index: Q2 @ 10.1% (Left Axis)
Homeownership Rate: Q3 @ 65.3% (Right Axis)
Economic Outlook 77
Labor Market Metrics
Layoffs have clearly declined but businesses are still reluctant to add staff
Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
HiringInitial Claims
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
Initial Claims for UnemploymentSeasonally Adjusted, In Thousands
Year-over-Year Percent Change: Nov-2 @ -7.4%
Initial Claims: Nov-2 @ 336.0 Thousand
4-Week Moving Average: Nov-2 @ 348.3 Thousand
52-Week Moving Average: Nov-2 @ 349.8 Thousand
2.6%
2.8%
3.0%
3.2%
3.4%
3.6%
3.8%
4.0%
4.2%
2.6%
2.8%
3.0%
3.2%
3.4%
3.6%
3.8%
4.0%
4.2%
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
U.S. Hiring RateSeasonally Adjusted
3-Month Moving Average: Aug @ 3.3%
12-Month Moving Average: Aug @ 3.2%
Economic Outlook 8
23.0%
68.1%
46.4%
50.0%
38.0%
28.1%
19.7%
20.3%
19.7%
22.2%
32.8%
15.4%
18.4%
16.3%
14.5%
36.4%
31.5%
24.7%
22.5%
20.7%
20.0%
18.8%
18.8%
17.3%
15.4%
14.9%
14.2%
12.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
U.S.
Nevada
Florida
Arizona
Michigan
Georgia
I llinois
Rhode Island
Ohio
Maryland
California
New J ersey
New Hampshire
Minnesota
Negative Equity by StatePercent of Mortgages Outstanding
Q2 2010
Q2 2013
Negative Equity Mortgages
The rise in home prices has helped bring down the
share of owners who own more on their home than
their home is worth
Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook
Percent change in real GDP by state 2011-2012
ID0.4
AR1.3
AL1.2
ME0.5
KS1.4
SD0.2
OH2.2
WI3.5
AZ2.6
NH0.5
MT2.1
MS2.4
OK2.1
NV1.5
IL1.9
GA2.1
FL2.4
CO2.1
CA3.5
NE1.5
MO2.0
UT3.4
NM0.2
WA3.6
IA2.4
MI2.2
LA1.5
VA1.1
TX4.8
PA1.7
IN3.3
NC2.7
MN3.5
KY1.4
VT1.2
TN3.3
OR3.9
NY1.3
WV3.3
ND13.4
SC2.7
WY3.3
AK1.1
CT-0.1
DE0.2
HI1.6
MA2.2
MD2.4
NJ1.3
RI1.4
DC0.7
U.S. = 2.5
3.3–13.4
-0.1–1.2
2.2–3.3
1.5–2.2
1.2–1.5
California
Economic Outlook 11
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
102%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
102%
69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11
California Employment: Percent of Previous Peak Percent
Percent of Previous Peak: Aug @ 96.4%
California Employment Picture
The most recent recession was more than twice as
severe as the one California experience following the
end of the Cold War
Nonfarm employment remains 3.6 percent below
its previous peak in California
Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook 1212
California – Labor Market
While nonfarm employment growth has decelerated recently, we suspect that job growth is being understated and look for the unemployment rate to trend lower.
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
California Nonfarm Employment3-Month Moving Averages
QCEW: Yr/Yr Pct. Change: Mar @ 2.9%Nonfarm: Yr/Yr Pct. Change: Aug @ 1.5%Household: Yr/Yr Pct. Change: Aug @ 2.8%
Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Unemployment & Labor ForceEmployment
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
California vs. U.S. Unemployment RateSeasonally Adjusted
Unemployment Rate: Aug @ 8.9%United States: Aug @ 7.3%
Economic Outlook 13
California Nonfarm Employment Growth by Industry
Source: US Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Prof. & Bus. Svcs.
Educ. & Health Svcs.
Leisure and Hospitality
Financial Activities
Trade, Trans. & Utilites
Manufacturing
GovernmentOther Services
Construction
Information
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
-5% -4% -3% -2% -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
3-M
onth
An
nualiz
ed P
erc
ent
Change
Year-over-Year Percent Change
California Employment Growth by Industry3-Month Moving Averages, August 2013
Percent of Total Employees
10% to 20%
5 % to 10%
Less than 5%
Recovering Expanding
Contracting Decelerating
Economic Outlook 14
Unemployment Rate by County
California
Source: US Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
California Unemployment RateAugust 2013
Less than 8.0%
Greater than 14.0%
10.0% to 12.0%
12.0% to 14.0%
8.0% to 10.0%
Economic Outlook 15
California Nonfarm Employment Growth
Source: US Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Orange County
Los Angeles
Inland Empire
San Diego
Oakland
Sacramento
San Jose
San Francisco
Fresno
Bakersfield
Oxnard
Stockton
Modesto
Santa Rosa
Visalia Santa Barbara
Salinas
Vallejo
Merced
San Luis Obispo
Santa Cruz
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
-1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
3-M
onth
Ann
ualiz
ed P
erc
en
t C
hange (
3M
MA
)
Year-over-Year Percent Change
California Employment Growth: August 20133-Month Moving Averages
Population3 Million+1 - 3 Mil.500 Thous. - 1 Mil.300 - 500 Thous.200 - 400 Thous.
Recovering Expanding
Contracting Decelerating
Economic Outlook 16
3.0%
18.4%
17.0%
5.9%
5.7%
4.9%
3.6%
3.0%
2.0%
1.8%
-2.3%
-3.8%
-8.1%
-11.7%
-20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30%
California
Data Processing
Internet Publishing, Broadcasting & Search Portals
Computer Systems Design
Software Publishers
Computer & Peripheral Equip. Manuf.
Aerospace & Parts Manufacturing
Scientific Research & Development
Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing
Architectural & Engineering Services
Telecommunications
Semiconductor & Electronic Component Manuf.
Other Device Manuf.
Communications Equip. Manuf.
California High-Tech Employment GrowthYear-over-Year Percent Change, 3-MMA, QCEW
March 2013
California High-Tech Employment
High-tech employment, particularly in data
processing, internet, software and computer
design, has seen stronger growth than the state
overall
Recent research by Enrico Moretti suggests that each technology job creates five
additional jobs
Source: U.S. Department of Laborand Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook
$74.0
$61.0
$52.7
$50.4
$46.8
$45.0
$42.7
$42.6
$40.7
$31.5
$30.0
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90
San Francisco
San J ose
Oakland
Orange County
San Diego
California
United States
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Fresno
Inland Empire
Per Capita IncomeThousands of Dollars, 2011
California Per Capita Income
High incomes will help boost local consumer
spending
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook 1818
California – Home Prices & Construction
With home prices improving, residential construction is gradually regaining strength
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
Core Logic HPI : CA vs. U.S.Year-over-Year Percent Change
United States: Sep @ 12.0%
California: Sep @ 22.5%
Source: CoreLogic, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Housing PermitsHome Prices
0
40
80
120
160
200
0
40
80
120
160
200
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
Thou
sand
s
Thou
sand
s
California Housing PermitsThousands of Permits, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate
Single-Family: Aug @ 43,392Single-Family, 12-MMA: Aug @ 34,298Multifamily, 12-MMA: Aug @ 37,907
Single-Family Average (1998-2003): 109,729
Economic Outlook 1919
California – Home Prices & Construction
With the rapid rise in home prices and slight rise in mortgage rates earlier this year, housing affordability has declined.
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
73 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 05 09 13
30-Year Conventional Mortage Rates
Historical Mortgage Rate
Current Rate: Nov @ 4.2%
Source: FHFA, CAR and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Housing AffordabilityMortgage Rates
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
C.A.R. Housing Affordability IndexSingle-Family Homes
Housing Affordability: Q2 2013 @ 36
Economic Outlook 20
15.4%
28.6%28.6%28.4%
27.4%27.1%
24.8%22.9%
18.1%16.2%
15.7%14.0%13.7%
12.0%11.4%
10.5%7.5%
6.7%6.6%
3.3%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
California
VallejoBakersfield
FresnoModestoStockton
Inland EmpireSalinas
SacramentoSanta Barbara
OaklandSanta RosaSan Diego
OxnardLos AngelesSanta Cruz
San Luis ObispoOrange County
San J oseSan Francisco
California Negative Equity by MSAPercent of Mortgages Outstanding
As of Q2 2013
Negative Equity by MSA
Many coastal areas now have a relatively low share
of negative equity mortgages outstanding, while inland areas have taken longer to recover
Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook
8.4%
9.3%
10.1%
10.3%
10.7%
13.0%
13.9%
14.3%
19.6%
20.3%
22.2%
22.3%
23.1%
23.7%
26.3%
30.4%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%
Oakland
Minneapolis-St. Paul
Warren
San Diego
Chicago
Sacramento
Inland Empire
Los Angeles
Tampa
Detroit
Las Vegas
Orlando
Charlotte
Atlanta
Phoenix
Miami
Share of Investor Purchases - CoreLogicPercent
As of December 2012
Investor Purchases
Investor purchases have helped drive up prices
Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Economic Outlook 2222
California – Apartments
Apartment development has picked up, particularly in the Bay Area, which has helped stem the slide in vacancy rates
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
San Francisco Apartment Supply & DemandPercent, Thousands of Units
Apartment Completions: Q3 @ 612 Units (Right Axis)Apartment Net Absorption: Q3 @ 641 Units (Right Axis)Apartment Vacancy Rate: Q3 @ 3.1% (Left Axis)
Source: Reis, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Los AngelesSan Francisco
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Los Angeles Apartment Supply & DemandPercent; Thousands of Units
Apartment Completions: Q3 @ 191 Units (Right Axis)
Apartment Net Absorption: Q3 @ 619 Units (Right Axis)
Apartment Vacancy Rate: Q3 @ 3.2% (Left Axis)
Economic Outlook 23
China Slowdown
InvestorHome Buying
Credit Availability & Financial Reform
ManufacturingCompetitiveness
Deleveraging
Monetary/FiscalPolicy Uncertainty
Immigration ReformEnergy/Commodity
Price Swings
Issues to Watch
Economic Outlook 24
Housing Forecast
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Real GDP, percent change - 0.3 - 2.8 2.5 1.8 2.8 1.6 2.2 2.6Nonfarm Employment, percent change - 0.6 - 4.4 - 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7Unemployment Rate 5.8 9.3 9.6 8.9 8.1 7.5 7.0 6.7
Home ConstructionTotal Housing Starts, in thousands 905.5 553.9 586.9 608.8 780.6 930.0 1,100.0 1,250.0Single- Family Starts, in thousands 622.0 445.0 471.1 430.5 535.3 645.0 780.0 910.0Multifamily Starts, in thousands 283.5 108.9 115.8 178.3 245.3 285.0 320.0 340.0
Home SalesNew Home Sales, Single- Family, in thousands 485.0 374.0 321.0 305.0 369.0 440.0 535.0 625.0Total Existing Home Sales, in thousands 4,110.0 4,340.0 4,190.0 4,260.0 4,650.0 5,100.0 5,300.0 5,480.0Existing Single- Family Home Sales, in thousands 3,660.0 3,870.0 3,708.0 3,787.0 4,127.0 4,500.0 4,680.0 4,840.0Existing Condominium & Townhouse Sales, in thousands 450.0 464.0 474.0 477.0 528.0 600.0 620.0 640.0
Home PricesMedian New Home, $ Thousands 232.1 216.7 221.8 227.2 245.2 262.0 270.0 278.0
Percent Change - 6.4 - 6.6 2.4 2.4 7.9 6.9 3.1 3.0Median Existing Home, $ Thousands 198.1 172.5 172.9 166.1 176.6 196.0 202.0 207.5
Percent Change - 9.5 - 12.9 0.2 - 3.9 6.3 11.0 3.1 2.7FHFA (OFHEO) Home Price Index (Purch Only), Pct Chg - 7.7 - 5.6 - 3.0 - 4.2 3.4 8.0 4.0 2.7Case- Shiller C- 10 Home Price Index, Percent Change - 16.7 - 12.9 2.1 - 3.5 0.3 11.8 8.1 3.2
Interest Rates - Annual AveragesPrime Rate 4.88 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25Ten- Year Treasury Note 3.66 3.26 3.22 2.78 1.80 2.41 2.85 3.25Conventional 30- Year Fixed Rate, Commitment Rate 6.04 5.04 4.69 4.46 3.66 4.11 4.55 4.95One- Year ARM, Effective Rate, Commitment Rate 5.18 4.71 3.79 3.03 2.77 2.80 3.20 3.40
Forecast as of: November 1, 2013
Source: Federal Reserve Board, FHFA, MBA, NAR, S&P, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
National Housing Outlook
Forecast
Economic Outlook 25
Our Forecast
Wells Fargo U.S. Economic Forecast
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Real Gross Domestic Product 1 1.1 2.5 2.8 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 1.8 2.8 1.7 2.3 2.8
Personal Consumption 2.3 1.8 1.5 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.4
Inflation Indicators 2
PCE Deflator 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.2 1.8 2.2
Consumer Price Index 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.0 2.0 3.1 2.1 1.5 1.9 2.2
Industrial Production 1 4.1 1.1 2.3 5.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 3.4 3.6 2.5 4.0 4.7
Corporate Profits Before Taxes 2 2.1 4.5 6.3 5.0 4.1 5.4 6.2 5.3 7.9 7.0 4.5 5.3 5.9
Trade Weighted Dollar Index 3 76.2 77.5 75.2 75.3 76.0 76.3 76.8 77.3 70.9 73.5 76.1 76.6 77.9
Unemployment Rate 7.7 7.6 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.0 7.0 6.9 8.9 8.1 7.5 7.0 6.7
Housing Starts 4 0.96 0.87 0.89 0.94 1.03 1.13 1.18 1.20 0.61 0.78 0.93 1.10 1.25
Quarter- End Interest Rates 5
Federal Funds Target Rate 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.44Conventional Mortgage Rate 3.57 4.07 4.49 4.30 4.40 4.50 4.60 4.70 4.46 3.66 4.11 4.55 4.9510 Year Note 1.87 2.52 2.64 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 2.78 1.80 2.41 2.85 3.25
Forecast as of: November 8, 20131 Compound Annual Growth Rate Quarter-over-Quarter2 Year-over-Year Percentage Change3 Federal Reserve Major Currency I ndex, 1973=100 - Quarter End4 Millions of Units5 Annual Numbers Represent Averages
ForecastActual
2013
Actual Forecast
2014
Appendix
Economic Outlook 27
Recent Special Commentary
Wells Fargo Economics Group Publications
To view any of our past research please visit:
http://www.wellsfargo.com/economics
To join any of our research distribution lists please
visit:http://www.wellsfargo.com/
economicsemail
Date Title Authors
October- 16 Short- Run Disruption, Long- Run Imbalance Silvia & BrownOctober- 16 Is There Pent- Up Demand for Consumer Durables? Bryson, Aleman & BrownOctober- 16 Household Debt Service Ratio: New Lows, Less Stress Silvia & Miller October- 14 Singapore GDP Stronger Than Expected in Q3 BrysonOctober- 09 The "Unsustainable" Path of Federal Fiscal Policy: Part II Silvia, Brown & ZacharyOctober- 07 The "Unsustainable" Path of Federal Fiscal Policy: Part I Silvia & BrownOctober- 03 Asheville's Recovery Remains Solidly on Track Vitner & WolfOctober- 03 How Does North Carolina Stack Up Today? Silvia, Brown & GriffithsOctober- 02 Abenomics Getting Warm Reception from J apanese Business QuinlanOctober- 02 Naples Four Years After the Recession Vitner & WolfOctober- 02 Housing Chartbook: September 2013 Vitner, Khan & SilvermanOctober- 02 Will British Consumers Continue to Spend? Bryson & MillerOctober- 01 Bank Lending: A Perspective on Credit Silvia & WattOctober- 01 Corporate Credit: Bond Finance and Power in Reserve Silvia & ZacharyOctober- 01 Shutdown Showdown: Deficit Remains the Issue Silvia & Brown
September- 27 Mexico: Tidbits of Better Times Ahead? AlemanSeptember- 27 Strong Growth in Argentina in Q2 2013 AlemanSeptember- 27 Sequestering Economic Growth? Silvia & BrownSeptember- 26 Why Has U.S. Labor Productivity Growth Slowed? Bryson & WattSeptember- 25 South Carolina 2013 Economic Outlook Vitner & Silverman September- 25 Interest Rate Update: Post the Big Non- Taper Silvia & Zachary September- 25 Consumer Credit: Critical Differences in Consumer Behavior Silvia & MillerSeptember- 24 Florida Consumer Sentiment Falls Back in September Vitner & Silverman September- 23 Does China Have a Debt Problem? BrysonSeptember- 20 California Adds 29,100 J obs, but Unemployment Rises Again Vitner & Silverman September- 20 Florida's J obless Rate Falls, but so Does the Labor Force Vitner & Silverman September- 20 British Economy Appears to Be Turning the Corner BrysonSeptember- 20 Texas Employment Takes a Step Back Vitner & WolfSeptember- 17 Russian Economy Struggles to Grow AlemanSeptember- 18 FOMC: Surprise- No Taper, Weaker Outlook for Growth SilviaSeptember- 17 Chicago's Recovery Is Well Under Way Vitner & Silverman September- 12 FDIC Loan Performance: Cyclical Improvement Silvia, Watt & Zachary September- 11 Las Vegas' Housing Recovery Built on Nontraditional Buyers Vitner & Silverman September- 11 Turkish GDP Growth Strengthened in Q2 BrysonSeptember- 11 Brazilian Economy Surprises in Q2 2013 AlemanSeptember- 10 Texas Economic Outlook: September 2013 Vitner & WolfSeptember- 04 Is the Eurozone Economy Starting to Thaw? BrysonSeptember- 03 Implications of Slower Inflation in South Korea QuinlanSeptember- 03 Midyear Consumer Sepnding Outlook Aleman & BrownSeptember- 03 Swiss Economy Continues to Chug Along Bryson
A Sampling of Our Recent Special, Regional & Industry Commentary
Economic Outlook
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Economics Group
28
John E. Silvia … ....................... … [email protected]
Global Head of Research and Economics
Diane Schumaker-Krieg ………………… ………[email protected] Head of Research & Economics
Chief Economist
Mark Vitner, Senior Economist……………....………. . .
Jay H. Bryson, Global Economist …………………....………[email protected]
Sam Bullard, Senior Economist [email protected]
Nick Bennenbroek, Currency Strategist……[email protected]
Eugenio J. Alemán, Senior Economist………………[email protected]
Anika R. Khan, Senior Economist … . [email protected]
Senior EconomistsZachary Griffiths, Economic Analyst [email protected]
Sara Silverman, Economic Analyst [email protected]
Mackenzie Miller, Economic Analyst [email protected]
Blaire Zachary, Economic Analyst [email protected]
Economists
Azhar Iqbal, Econometrician………………………………[email protected]
Tim Quinlan, Economist …………………………………[email protected]
Michael A. Brown, Economist ………………… [email protected]
Sarah Watt, Economist …………………………… [email protected]
Michael T. Wolf, Economist …………………… [email protected]
Economic Analysts
Administrative Assistants
Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Securities Asia Limited and Wells Fargo Securities (Japan) Co. Limited. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. (“WFS”) is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“WFBNA”) is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. WFS and WFBNA are generally engaged in the trading of futures and derivative products, any of which may be discussed within this publication. The information and opinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company © 2013 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.
SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED/NOT BANK-GUARANTEED/MAY LOSE VALUE
Important Information for Non-U.S. Recipients
For recipients in the EEA, this report is distributed by Wells Fargo Securities International Limited (“WFSIL”). WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this report has been approved by WFSIL a regulated person under the Act. WFSIL does not deal with retail clients as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2007. The FCA rules made under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 for the protection of retail clients will therefore not apply, not will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available. This report is not intended for, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients. This document and any other materials accompanying this document (collectively, the “Materials”) are provided for general informational purposes only.
Peg Gavin, Executive Assistant.
Cyndi Burris, Senior Administrative Assistant [email protected]