37
Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective Miscue Analysis

Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Week 3

“reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but

about constructing meaning.

•-Martens (1998) Using Retrospective Miscue Analysis

Page 2: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

• Review Cueing systems• Recording and assessing children’s oral reading• Miscue Analysis/ Running Records

• Practice with RR/MA

Page 3: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Flexibility and TransferWhat an adult assumes to be erroneous often reflects development in the child. Children’s expressions of language or inventions, reflect their current schemas, or working models for how language works” (Owacki & Goodman, 2002)•Butterflies•Aquarium Writing•Nate’s List

Page 4: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Identity and Agency•How does Identity and Agency come into play in our instruction

•Big Ideas?•In whole class•With tutoring?

•Connections/thoughts/questions

Page 5: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Making Sense of Texts

• Cueing systems can be thought of as different language resources, or information stores, that a person can draw on as they make sense of texts• The cueing systems are not used in isolation!• Successful readers never use only graphophonics, or only

semantics, or only one other cueing system when they read.• Successful reading and writing involves the meaningful

integration of multiple cueing systems.• Relate this to the readings for today

Page 6: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

The Cueing SystemsUsed by readers to “unlock” the printed text• Graphophonemic System – Phonics• Semantic System – Meaning• Syntactic System – Grammar• Pragmatic System – How we use language based on our social

situation

Page 7: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

How do children use the cueing systems?

• Effective teachers know that children use all four cueing systems when engaged in literacy activities• Example

• However, in any given circumstance, when trying to decipher a difficult text, one cueing system might be emphasized or relied upon more than the others.• Example

Page 8: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Phonological System

• The symbol systems of oral and written language and the relationship between them. • Phonics – Relationship between phonological and

orthographic (spelling) systems (letter-sound correspondence)• This cueing system deals with the smallest chunks of

language:• Phonemes (units of sound)• graphemes (units of written representation of phonemes)

Page 9: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Syntactic System

• How words and parts of words are combined into sentences

• Word order• Tense• Number• Gender

• How words and parts of speech go together to sound like meaningful language• Structural rules of a language--grammar

Page 10: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Semantic System

• Relationships between language and meaning, the heart of language;• Focus is on vocabulary: What words and phrases

mean• Synonyms, antonyms, homonyms

• Strongly related to social and cultural group• Soda vs. pop• Milk shake vs. frappe• Sub vs. hoagie

Page 11: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Pragmatic System

• Function of language: Dependent on the social, cultural, and historical contexts of language use• What we know about how and when to change

language to particular social settings• “Is your mother there?” (in a phone conversation)

– implies “I’d like to speak to your mother.”

Page 12: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Using the cueing systems…

Page 13: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Read the following passage:

The tam sat directly on top of his head.

• What is a tam?• How did you know how to read this passage?• What cues did you use?

Page 14: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Read the following passageThem chicken jackin my style

They try to copy my swaggerI'm on that next s*** nowI'm so 3008You so 2000 and late

What is a chicken?What is she saying?How do you know? What cueing system did you use?

Page 15: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Read the following passage:Jackie G. had 12 assists, 11 service points, and four

aces. Taylor C. and Paige L. led the offensive attack with a combined 17 kills. Rachel F. and Jenny M. both added 10 digs.• What is this passage talking about?• What are “kills” and “digs.”• How do you know?• What cues did you use?

Page 16: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Recording Oral Reading

Running Records, Miscue Analysis, and Retrospective Miscue Analysis (RMA)

Purpose of each: To analyze how children employ different cueing systems or

strategies as they read“An individual error is less informative than a pattern of errors”

Miscue or error? Error implies doing something wrong or not using a strategyMiscue implies using strategies, although perhaps not the best

one for the text

Page 17: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Recording MiscuesThere are different conventions for annotating oral

reading. Consistency is the most important thing.Running Records ..\..\..\Fall 2010 teaching\209\RR.pdf

Don’t need a copy of the textCheck marks/annotations as you goCan be done “on the fly”

Miscue Analysis/Retrospective Miscue Analysis ..\..\..\Fall 2010 teaching\209\miscue.pdfRecord using audio or videoRevisit recording, do annotations on copy of textMore time consuming, but more accurateFor RMA: Child listens to her/his own reading

Page 18: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Text Selection for RR/MA

• The ideal is to record oral reading with a text the child can read with about 90-95% accuracy.• Child choice• Estimate based on other data (informal observation of child

reading, etc.)• Have a few different texts on hand

• Before conducting a RR/MA:• Get to know your student as a reader• Find out if child is familiar with the text• Try to get a handle on his/her prior knowledge of the topic and of

the text itself

Page 19: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Important Considerations

Things that may affect a child’s oral reading:Familiarity with text, series, genre, topicAge/fluency of oral vs. silent reading (RMA can help mediate this)Affective domain (rapport, comfort, emotions)Assessment fatigue

When using a voice recorder, ask child’s permission to record; consider allowing him/her to record you. Be honest about why you want to record him or her.

Page 20: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

And yet more practice…

• Listen to Lizzie’s Lunch• Conduct a RR/MA as you listen

• See wiki for readings: Retrospective Miscue: Learning from Michael• Practice doing RR/MA on Harrison’s reading• Bring your RR/MA to class next time

Page 21: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Week 3, day 2

•“Teachers can, of course, be the midwives of hope or the purveyors of determinism and despair. It all depends on context and choice.”

~Ayers, W. (2004), pg x

Page 22: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Today’s Topics

• Inquiry Groups • Miscue Analysis• Retrospective Miscue Analysis• Assessment-Instruction cycle

Page 23: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Fluency anticipation guide• Answer the Agree/Disagree statements and leave with me on

your way out the door.

Page 24: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Inquiry Process• Topics based on student curiosity, questions, interests• Dig deeply into complex, authentic topics that matter• Flexible grouping• Student responsibility with peer leadership• Use of proficient reader/thinker researcher strategies• Draws on multigenre, multimedia resources• Going beyond fact-finding to synthesizing and applying

knowledge• Actively using knowledge: take action, share, go public• Match kids’ learning to state and district curriculum

Page 25: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Why Inquiry?• Focuses on children’s natural inquisitiveness • Student control, responsibility and choice increases self-

efficacy and is motivating• Helps develop problem-solving skills• Students are engaged in authentic, meaningful learning

experiences• Small group interactions are “life-like”• Allows for differentiated instruction• Develops proficient readers and thinkers

Page 26: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Inquiry Groups• Assignment Guidelines• Texts will be available for you to browse during our visit to

Milner• Inquiry topics will be selected next week-

Page 27: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Practice with RR/MA• Turn to pg 85 in your packet.

Page 28: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

RR Practice with Partners

• Listen to audio of child reading: the Pirate and the Parrot ..\..\..\Fall 2010 teaching\209\MA_RR\pirate and the parrot.mp3• Compare notations• Discuss this student’s reading; remember to consider how he

uses his cueing systems.• Fill out MA sheet

Page 29: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Tallying and Analyzing RR and MA

• What counts as a miscue? (Review pp. 214-215!• Not all miscues are created equally• High quality miscues (semantically acceptable)• Low quality miscues (semantically unacceptable)

• M, S, V• Tally sheets• Johns & Lenski

Page 30: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Analyzing the Miscues/Errors• High/ low quality miscue• Acceptable miscues

• Graphic similarities• Self-corrections• Cueing systems

• Questions to ask• Syntactic acceptability: Does it sound like English?• Semantic acceptability: Does it make sense?• Meaning change? Y N P

Page 31: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Summary/Analysis Sheet

• Harry Potter Reading (260 words)• Self-correction rate (sc/unacceptable miscues)• Tally errors: total errors - sc • Error & accuracy rates: (errors/total words) x 100

• Do self-corrections of acceptable miscues count?• Some say yes, some say no• I say yes; it’s good to keep track of them

• Caveats for interpretation:• Be careful of faulty assumptions (error/accuracy rate)• Listen to Evan’s retell: (CD)• Red flags with Evan’s Harry Potter reading

Page 32: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

More Considerations• When sharing notations with students, or discussing their

reading, focus on strengths at the outset• When a child gets frustrated• Use an intervention (i.e., “try that again”)• Let’s try another text• Change the activity

• If a child breezes through with few miscues• Move on to a more difficult text• Consider WHY she/he breezed through• Fluency?• Accurate word calling?• Text familiarity?

• A retell may help you assess comprehension

Page 33: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Review student reading• Using your RR/MA from Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus do

the following: • Discuss your annotations with your group• Discuss your completion of the analysis form

• I will circulate to answer questions

• Listen to another student read- make annotations in your packet. Pg 96-97

Page 34: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

What does it mean?• What does your student know?• What level of text is this for your student?• Independent 95-100%• Instructional 90-94%• Frustration 80-89%

Page 35: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

Retelling• Johnston discusses a few problems with retells:• It is not a realistic, everyday activity if both people read or saw the

same text.• More able readers have an intuitive understanding of the testing

situation, while less able readers do not (pragmatics!) and so may not perform as well

• Students from non middle-class households may be familiar with different story structures than those common in middle class homes. This can impact retelling

• See Johns & Lenski for ideas for retelling• See also packet 42-49

Page 36: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

What do we know?• What assessments have we done?• What do they tell us?• What do we need to know more about

• Possible strategies/goals?

• Assessment/Instruction cycle

Page 37: Week 3 “reading is not about recognizing words to accurately reproduce the printed text, but about constructing meaning. -Martens (1998) Using Retrospective

For Tuesday…• Fluency readings- see wiki• Practice RR/MA with Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus• Continue to work on tool kit• Think about possible topics for inquiry