Upload
lavonn
View
35
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Unitec Teaching & Learning Symposium. I Teach Alone or We Teach Together: Exploring Team Teaching and Impact on Teacher Identity Daniel Stamp Department of Sport. Session Outline. Our project Team Teaching Disadvantages and advantages Identity Challenges. Sport Science Project. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Unitec Teaching & Learning SymposiumI Teach Alone or We Teach Together: Exploring Team Teaching and Impact on Teacher Identity
Daniel StampDepartment of Sport
Session Outline Our project Team Teaching
Disadvantages and advantages Identity
Challenges
Sport Science Project Integration of sport and exercise
science courses Interdisciplinary approach Better understanding for students Team teaching approach
All interdisciplinary courses and classes No mono-discipline courses or classes Integrated assignments
Team Teaching A group of two or more teachers
working together to plan, conduct and evaluate the learning activities for the same group of learners. Teaching the same students at the same
time within the same classroom. Working together but not necessarily
teaching the same group of students nor necessarily teaching at the same time.(Shaplin & Olds, 1964)
Team Teaching Traditional Team Teaching Collaborative Teaching Complimentary/Supportive Team
Teaching Parallel Instruction Differentiated Split Class Monitoring Teacher(Robinson & Schaible, 1995)
Collaborative Teaching Team teachers work together in
designing the course and teach the material not by monologue, but rather by exchanging and discussing ideas and theories in front of the learners from multiple perspectives.
Collaborative Teaching Obvious potential in broadening topic
expertise and perhaps reducing individual teacher’s classroom time.
Offers other significant teaching/learning possibilities Model for the learners a wide variety of
professional interactions including Disagreement Exploration Concept evaluation Conflict Resolution Collaboration (Wenger & Hornyak, 1999)
Disadvantages for Teacher Time required prior to implementation
for professional development Learning the rational behind team
teaching Shared readings and discussion Learning co-operative skills Learning time management skills
Many meetings or impromptu chats during the running of the course
Potential conflict
Advantages for Teacher Supportive environment Development of new teaching
approaches Overcomes academic isolation Likelihood of sounder solutions
regarding discipline of problematic students
Augments the opportunity for intellectual growth
Disadvantages for Student Potential frustration and
discontentment about having more than one teacher
Confusion from considering multiple perspectives of an issue
Concern about assignments
Advantages for Students Students benefit from seeing teachers
collaborate and co-operate. Allows students to see how topics are
connected therefore making better sense of the information.
Interdisciplinary learning reinforces understanding of new concepts.
Students observe teachers planning in front of them.
Obtain the ‘bigger picture’.
Making it work Teachers share common beliefs
about learning and students. Teachers will question their own
teaching as well as learning from their teaching colleague.
Teaching colleague will listen and share during classes.
Trusting and open relationships. Practice disagreeing amicably.
Professional Issues Teachers have different
philosophies. Sharing of workloads, equal
contribution required. Exposes professional and personal
points of view. Worry about professional growth.
Expertise?
Teacher’s Emotional Challenges Giving up unitary control of the
classroom Allowing one’s ideas to be publicly
challenged Openly acknowledging the limits of
one’s knowledge Impact on one’s identity
Identity How a person describes him- or
herself to be distinctive or unique (Brettschneider & Heim, 1997).
Who are you? Includes our values and norms.
How will team teaching impact on these?
Will your specific teacher identity change?
Teacher Identity Teacher identity or teacher-self
incorporates the holistic, dynamic, and situated nature of teacher development.
The teacher is an autonomous individual constantly moving between the need to connect with other colleagues and the need to maintain a sense of individuality
Teacher Identity Individuality One key aspect to this transition
from “me” to “we” is the need to overcome the discomfort of relinquishing the autonomy and authority that are inherent to teaching alone (Martin 1975).
Shifts in statuses and roles Power (dominance)
Teacher Identity One’s comfort with one’s “teaching self”
increases dramatically over time as our status enhances (Olson and Einwohner, 2001)
Negotiation of teacher identities Student perceptions
Is fluid and dynamic by nature and can be shaped by social engagements with others. Embrace formation of new and different
identities? Hold on to old established identity?
Teacher Identity Issues Understanding identity and the issues
related to it can be a challenging endeavour. the problem of defining the concept the place of the self related issues of agency, emotion, narrative
and discourse the role of reflection the influence of contextual factors.(Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009)
Challenging the Teacher’s Identity Identity negotiation in team teaching
has the potential to impact one’s teaching, one’s career, and student’s learning (Auster & MacRone, 1994).
Establishing oneself as a credible lecturer who has enough knowledge, experience, and authority to teach class content effectively is an on-going aspect of any classroom interaction.
References Auster, C. J., & MacRone, M. (1994). The classroom
as a negotiated social setting: An empirical study of the effects of faculty members’ behavior on students’ participation. Teaching Sociology, 22(3), 289-300.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.
Brettschneider, W. D., & Heim, R. (1997). Identity, sport, and youth development, in K.R. Fox (ed.). The physical self: From motivation to well-being, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
References Goetz, K. (2000). Perspectives on team
teaching. Egallery, 1 (4), August. Martin, W. (1975). The negotiated order of
teachers in team teaching situations. Sociology of Education 48(2):202-22.
Olson, T., & Einwohner. R. (2001). Forming and transforming the teaching self in different institutional environments: Two teachers’ experiences. Teaching Sociology 29(4):403-22.
Robinson, B., & Schaible, R. (1995). Collaborative teaching: Reaping the benefits. College Teaching, 43(2), 57-60.
References Shaplin, J. T., & Olds, Jr. H. F. (Eds.) (1964).
Team teaching (pp. 1-23). New York: Harper and Row.
Wenger, M. S., & Hornyak, M. J. (1999). Team teaching for higher level learning: A framework of professional collaboration. Journal of Management Education, 23(3), 311-327.