3
Dimensional Engineering/Dimensional Management 1,632 members Join Discussions Promotions Jobs About Search About this Group Created: March 3, 2009 Type: Professional Group About Feedback LinkedIn Corp. © 2015 Have something to say? Join LinkedIn for free to participate in the conversation. When you join, you can comment and post your own discussions. Boorla Srinivasa Murthy Craftsmanship and Dimensional Management Leader Can anybody suggest which tolerance analysis tool is good Easy use, better interface with all CAD software, reliable results, less cost . Etc Can it be VisVSA, 3DCS , CeTol , any other ?? March 25, 2011 See previous comments Ralph Gifford Michael has hit the nail on the head. It's about choosing the right tool based on what you're trying to do, how much time you have, and your level of expertise. If you're doing design validation rather than design optimization, you'll also want to consider compatibility with your CAD system. October 7, 2011 Rajendra Deshmukh UG , Pro/E offer limited capabilities as far as tolerance analysis goes. You can use 3dcs StandAlone version to pull data from Pro/E,UG or any CAD software including jt files and use them in 3dcsSA. 3dcsSA then allows user to apply variation using DCS tolerances OR GD&T tolerances OR Mixed approach.(support for ASME and ISO available). perform statistical analysis (Monte` Carlo, RSS, WorstCase), Sensitivity/HLM, GeoFactor. October 8, 2011 Norm Crawford Ralph, Just because process capability (SPC controls) may be in place to revent virtual and resultant conditions from ever occuring, it doesn't mean that the contributor should be eliminated from any statistical analysis. But I am glad to hear that Enventive takes the contributor under consideration. I would love to validate that on a relatively simple model. Rajendra What is a DCS tolerance vs a GD&T tolerance? Is there a new standard there? What is a Mixed approach to tolerances? October 10, 2011 Norm Crawford When it comes to tolerance analysis and part definition, I have to wonder how parts are being toleranced without GD&T. Yes, there are other standards that cover GD&T besides Y14.5, but surely one of them is being used. Right? If parts are being defined without GD&T, I would think Privacy & Terms

Tolerance Analysis Tool is Good Easy Use

  • Upload
    dacmac

  • View
    221

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Tolerance

Citation preview

  • DimensionalEngineering/DimensionalManagement

    1,632members Join

    Discussions Promotions Jobs About Search

    AboutthisGroup

    Created:March3,2009Type:ProfessionalGroup

    About Feedback

    LinkedInCorp.2015

    Havesomethingtosay?JoinLinkedInforfreetoparticipateintheconversation.Whenyoujoin,youcancommentandpostyourowndiscussions.

    BoorlaSrinivasaMurthy CraftsmanshipandDimensionalManagementLeader

    CananybodysuggestwhichtoleranceanalysistoolisgoodEasyuse,betterinterfacewithallCADsoftware,reliableresults,lesscost.EtcCanitbeVisVSA,3DCS,CeTol,anyother?? March25,2011

    Seepreviouscomments

    RalphGiffordMichaelhashitthenailonthehead.It'saboutchoosingtherighttoolbasedonwhatyou'retryingtodo,howmuchtimeyouhave,andyourlevelofexpertise.Ifyou'redoingdesignvalidationratherthandesignoptimization,you'llalsowanttoconsidercompatibilitywithyourCADsystem. October7,2011

    RajendraDeshmukhUG,Pro/Eofferlimitedcapabilitiesasfarastoleranceanalysisgoes.Youcanuse3dcsStandAloneversiontopulldatafromPro/E,UGoranyCADsoftwareincludingjtfilesandusethemin3dcsSA.3dcsSAthenallowsusertoapplyvariationusingDCStolerancesORGD&TtolerancesORMixedapproach.(supportforASMEandISOavailable).performstatisticalanalysis(Monte`Carlo,RSS,WorstCase),Sensitivity/HLM,GeoFactor. October8,2011

    NormCrawfordRalph,

    Justbecauseprocesscapability(SPCcontrols)maybeinplacetoreventvirtualandresultantconditionsfromeveroccuring,itdoesn'tmeanthatthecontributorshouldbeeliminatedfromanystatisticalanalysis.ButIamgladtohearthatEnventivetakesthecontributorunderconsideration.Iwouldlovetovalidatethatonarelativelysimplemodel.

    RajendraWhatisaDCStolerancevsaGD&Ttolerance?Isthereanewstandardthere?WhatisaMixedapproachtotolerances? October10,2011

    NormCrawfordWhenitcomestotoleranceanalysisandpartdefinition,IhavetowonderhowpartsarebeingtolerancedwithoutGD&T.Yes,thereareotherstandardsthatcoverGD&TbesidesY14.5,butsurelyoneofthemisbeingused.Right?IfpartsarebeingdefinedwithoutGD&T,Iwouldthink

    Privacy&Terms

  • thatchoiceoftoleranceanalysistoolistheleastofproblems.:) October10,2011

    NormCrawfordFarshidWhenyouaskaboutUG,IamassumingyouareaskingabouttheNXCADsystem.Ifso,thatsystemhasananalysismodulethatincludesTSV(ToleranceStackupValidation).TSVisessentiallyaVSAlightandanalysismodelsinTSVcanthenbedirectlyimportedintoVSAformoredetailedandadvancedanalysis.AsfarasIknow,Pro/EusersgravitatetotheCEToladdon.Thesignificantdifference,inmyopinion,isthatTSVanalyzesdatumshiftbutlastIknewCEToldoesnoteventhoughitallowsthematerialmodifiersinthedatumreferenceframes.Witheitheroneofthesetwo,Ithinkyouarewaybetteroffthantryingtodomultipartassemblystacksbyhand. October10,2011

    NormCrawfordFarshidSorryImissedyourquestion,YesIhaveconsiderableexperiencewithTeamcenterVisualizationVisMockupsincethatiswhereVSAactuallyfunctionsasanoption.October10,2011

    MichaelLiuAnearliercommentmademeremembersomethingfromafewyearsback.Whentheproductionreleasedrawingswerelateonacertainprogram...Iheardanirrateprogrammanagerask,"whytheh*llcan'tyoumakeagagewithoutadrawing?"

    MythoughtisthatifmodelsarebeingwrittenwithoutGD&T....atleastthatisconsistentinpractice....IthinkdrawingsarealsobeingreleasedwithoutGD&T....oronlyafterprocessingthosedrawingsbyaGD&Tdredge.

    Mythoughtthough...Idon'tthinkthisisanedgeforVSA...ThetruthisthatDCSdoesallowtheusertofollowtherulesofY14.5M...althoughwhenIusedit,onecouldstillviolatesomerules.I'veseenvariationmodelsbutcheredinVSA,3DCS,andCeTolsoftwarepackages...andI'veseengoodonesinall3.

    Abiggerfactormaybepersonnel.

    Ithinkthesepackagesrequireveryexperiencedpersonnel.But,unfortunately,thattalentpoolisdisappearing...Inthelastcoupleofweeks,sometop3Dvariationanalysisprofessionalswerelaidoff.Itmakesmewonderif"modelingpros"aregoingthewayofthedrawingchecker.October10,2011

    NormCrawfordWellMike,myguessisthattherealissueisthatcompaniescontinuetotryandshortcuttherelativelysimpleknowledgeandapplicationofGD&T.Itseemseveryonewantsasimplesolutiontohandlethesocalledsimple+/dimensions.Therealissueisthatveryfewpeoplereallyunderstandthevariationandinterpretationofthesocalled+/dimension.Itisveryveryrareforanengineertoanswerthequestionsrelatedtoa+/dimensioninaGD&Tfundamentalsclass,butsomehowtheywerecomfortablewithusingthemparticularlyifthedrawinginfactssaystointerpretthedrawingpertheASMEY14.5standard.(Idon'treallycarewhatyear.:))Asforgooddimensionalmanagementtypesbeinglaidoff?Thattoojustamazesme.Toooftencompanymanagementjustisnotpresentedwiththe"money"withregardtogoodvspoordimensionalmanagement.Ihavepersonallyseenprojectplansthat"plan"forthetoolingchangesandprojectdelaysmostofwhichwillbeduetodimensionalissues.Simplyamazing.October10,2011

    PrabhathKakaraparthiYa,CETOLisreallygood.Maybeintheinitialstageittakestimeforsomepersonstogetcomfortablewiththesoftware,butitisreallygood. October15,2011

    WhatisLinkedIn? JoinToday SignIn

  • farshidhesamihi

    ImlookingforlinkfordownloadTeamCenterVisulaizationProduct..

    Pleasehelpme. October15,2011