0 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee

November 18, 2010

City of San Diego

February 16, 2011

THE REGIONAL AVIATION STRATEGIC PLAN (RASP) ANDTHE AIRPORT MULTIMODAL ACCESSIBILITY PLAN (AMAP)

1

Multimodal Airport Planning

RASP

Regional AviationStrategic Plan

SDCRAA (Authority)

AMAP

Airport MultimodalAccessibility Plan

SANDAG

2050 RTP

RegionalTransportation Plan

California SenateBill 10

Promote long-rangeplanning

Enhance regionalcooperation

Ensure consistencybetween Authority and

SANDAG decisions

Senate Bill 10 – Multimodal Planning to be Coordinated by SDCRAA and SANDAG

1

2

Project OverviewRegional Aviation Strategic Plan (RASP)

3-Phase Work Plan

Stakeholder and public outreach

Task-specific documentation and deliverables

Phase 1

Data Gathering andModel Development

Spring -Winter 2009

Phase 2

Evaluation of

Concepts and

Strategies

Spring -Summer 2010

Phase 3

Regional Aviation

Strategic Plan

Fall 2010 -Spring 2011

2

3 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee

January 11, 2011

RASP Study Area

12 Public Use Airports Located in a Densely Populated and Developed Region

Notes: Tijuana Int. Airport not located in San Diego County.

Military facilities are excluded from the RASP.

3

4 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee

January 11, 2011

Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.

Strategic Assessment Findings

Airports That Should be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities

4

5 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee

January 11, 2011

Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.

Strategic Assessment Findings

Airports That May be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities

5

6 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee

January 11, 2011

Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.

Strategic Assessment Findings

Airports That Should Not be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities

6

7

1. Commercial Passenger Optimization

A. Full build-out of the ITC and north side terminalat San Diego International

B. Preserve SDIA airfield capacity for commercial

service

C. Enhance commercial passenger service atMcClellan-Palomar Airport

D. Introduce commercial passenger service atBrown Field

E. Up-gauge SDIA’s Fleet Mix –Narrow-body

Fleet

F. Up-gauge SDIA’s Fleet Mix – Increased Wide-body Fleet

2. Enhanced Utilization of Tijuana

A. Tijuana Rodriguez International Airport focus

on commercial service

B. Aviation passenger cross border facility(currently proposed)

C. Cross border airport terminal

Alternative Scenarios

3. California High Speed Rail

Stations at downtown LA, ONT Airport and:

A. Station at downtown San Diego

B. Station at SDIA

4. General Aviation Optimization

A. Enhance McClellan-Palomar Airport for high-end / corporate general aviation

B. Enhance Brown Field for high-end / corporategeneral aviation

C. Enhance Gillespie Field for mix-use generalaviation

5. Air Cargo Optimization

A. Introducecargo service at Brown Field

15 Scenarios Considered; 13 Subject to Technical Evaluation

7

8

Evaluation Matrix Compares Scenario Costs andBenefits

+ 1B

Esti

mate

d s

cen

ari

o c

ost ($

mill

ions)

Intermodal Transit Center (ITC) andnorth side terminal at SDIA (1A)

Demand accommodated over the “Do-nothing” Scenario in 2030(million enplaned passengers)

Scenario Families

1. Commercial Passenger (Airline) Optimization

2. Enhanced Utilization of Tijuana

3. California High Speed Rail

4. General Aviation Optimization

HSR station located at SDIA ordowntown San Diego (3A/B)

Cross Border Facility /pedestrian bridge (2B)

Cross BorderAirport Terminal (2C)

Enhance bordercrossings (2A)

Enhance McClellan-Palomarfor passenger service (1C)

Dedicate Gillespie Field formixed-use general aviation (4C)

Dedicate Frown Field forhigh-end general aviation (4B)

Dedicate McClel lan-Palomar tohigh-end general aviation (4A)

Dedicate SDIA to passengeraircraft operations only (1B)or require airlines to up-gauge their fleet mixes (1E)

9

1.All reasonable ideas and concepts were evaluated

2.The passenger capacity of San Diego Internationalcan only marginally be improved

3.Regional airport improvements are possible

4.No single entity in the region can unilaterallyimplement RASP findings

5.RASP included significant stakeholder / technicalcontributions

RASP Summary Considerations

9

10

RASP Next Steps / More Information

10

• Draft RASP Technical Report availablefor review and input at:www.sdrasp.com

• Input can be emailed to:info@sdrasp.com

• SDCRAA Board to accept RASPFindings At March 2011 Meeting

11

Stakeholder and public outreach

Project Overview –Airport Multimodal Accessibility Plan (AMAP)

Phase 1

High-Speed TrainConnections

Phase 2

Transit and

Roadway

Improvements

Phase 3

Airport Multimodal

Accessibility Plan

(AMAP)

11

12

High-Speed TrainConnections

LA to SD via InlandEmpire Section

– Ontario International

– March ARB

– San BernardinoInternational connection

San Diego IntermodalTransportation Center(ITC)

Future extension toCross Border Facility/Tijuana International

12

13

Airport Intermodal Transportation Center

Opening Day

Full Build-out

13

14

AMAP Proposed Ground Access Improvements

San Diego International Airport

•Airport Intermodal TransportationCenter

Gillespie Field

• Intersection Improvements atMarshall Ave

•Future BRT Modifications•Future Relocated Gillespie FieldLight Rail Station

Cross Border Facil ity

McClel lan-Palomar Airport

•Ramp Improvements at SR 905and Britannia Blvd

•Local Bus Connections•Direct Bus Service•Future High-Speed Train

•Palomar Airport Rd Widening•Owens Ave and Camino VidaRobles Arterial Improvements

•Local Bus Service to PoinsettiaCOASTER Station

15

Direct Transit Service(“FlyAway”)

To SDIA from:

I-15 Corridor

I-5 North Coast

To Cross Border Facility from:

I-15 Corridor

Airport ITC

H Street Trolley Station

15

16

AMAP Next Steps

Additional Stakeholder Outreach

Ground Access Improvements

– Transportation Modeling (underway)

– Cost Estimates (underway)

2050 Regional Transportation Plan

– Aviation Forecasts (complete)

– RASP and AMAP Findings (underway)

– Aviation/Ground Access Section of Draft (underway)

Draft/Final Report

16

17

18

2050 RTP Process and Timeline

RevenueProjections

ProjectEvaluation

Criteria

NetworkDevelopment

All Modes

PlanPerformance

Measures

RankedProjects byCategory

ApplyPerformance

Measures

Spring 2010 Fall 2009 Summer 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011

2050RegionalGrowth

Forecast

Goalsand

ObjectivesRevenue

Constrained/SCS Preferred

NetworkScenario

Draft2050 RTPand EIR

RevenueConstrained/SCS Network

Scenarios

Unconstrained Network