88
The management of recurrent pelvic malignancy Pete Sagar The General Infirmary at Leeds England

The management of recurrent pelvic malignancy

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The management of recurrent pelvic malignancy. Pete Sagar The General Infirmary at Leeds England. Things could be worse. TWO-timing Shane Warne has been caught cheating with ANOTHER woman. EXCLUSIVE: SHANE'S AT IT AGAIN Cheat Aussie star's two-month affair - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

The management of recurrent pelvic malignancy

Pete Sagar

The General Infirmary at Leeds

England

Things could be worse

EXCLUSIVE: SHANE'S AT IT AGAINCheat Aussie star's two-month affairBy Megan Lloyd Davies And Richard Smith

MESSAGES: Warne sent a string of texts

TWO-timing Shane Warne has been caught cheating with ANOTHER woman.

Presentation

• PAIN

The problem

• 8-10 000 cases annually of rectal cancer in the UK

• Local pelvic recurrence in 5-15%

Treatment – radiotherapy/chemotherapy

• Good initial palliation

• Long term survivors are rare

• Reserved for end stage disease

Treatment- surgery

• Multimodality therapy

• Team approach essential

• Technical demands

Preoperative assessment

• Biopsy to confirm diagnosis

• CT chest and abdomen

• MRI pelvis

• EUA

• Fitness for operation

The Leeds MDT meeting

Accommodation for relatives

Accommodation for relatives (NHS)

Patterns of pelvic invasion

• Localised type

• Sacral invasion

• Pelvic side wall invasion

Localized type

• Recurrent tumour is localized to the adjacent tissues or connective tissue

Peri-anastomotic recurrence

Perineal recurrence

Mucinous adenocarcinoma

Sacral invasion

• Recurrent tumour invades the lower sacrum (S3, S4, S5) or coccyx

Chordoma with sacral invasion

Sacral invasion- gadolinium enhanced

Lateral invasion

• Recurrent tumour invades pelvic side wall

Pelvic side wall invasion

Vesico-ureteric junction

Planes of attack

APR+S vs TPE+S

Rectus abdominus flap

Anatomical points

When not to operate

Choose your patient!

Contraindications

• Extrapelvic disease

• Invasion of S1 or S2

• Invasion through greater sciatic notch

• Extensive pelvic side wall involvement

• ASA IV-V

Para-aortic nodal involvement

Greater sciatic notch involvement

Surgical intervention contraindicated

Extension through both greater sciatic foramina

Technical tips

Perianastomotic recurrence

Peri-anastomotic recurrence

• Residual mesentery

• Anticipate tearing around the anastomosis

• Beware the medial course of the ureters

Anterior invasion into bladder

Anterior spread

• Trial dissection

• Plane anterior to the bladder

• APER

• Involve the urologist

Sidewall vessel involvement

vessels

Pelvic side wall

• BLEEDING

• Suture

• Fibrillar surgicell

• Argon beamer

• Be prepared to pack

Presacral space, no direct invasion

Pre-sacral mass

• Control iliac vessels before dissection of mass

• Incise peritoneum and develop plane between mass and sacrum

• Beware spongy tumour

Direct invasion into the sacrum

Direct invasion of the sacrum

• Choose level of sacrectomy carefully

• Frozen section

• Beware bleeding from pre-sacral veins

Posterior

exenteration

35%

30%

Total

exenteration

Resection of mass alone

15%

9%

Gynaecological clearance

7%

Anterior

exenteration

Rectal resection with

primary anastomosis

4%

Sacrectomy

16%

Cumulative survival R0 vs R1 resections

Outcome

• One third will live five years

• One third will recur locally (?re-operate)

• One third will die of disseminated disease

Conclusion

• Multidisciplinary management

• Surgery prime modality

• Surgical team approach essential

ENGLAND WIN THE ASHES

Intra-operative radiotherapy

• Delivery of high biological equivalent

• Dose limiting structures are displaced

• 45-60 Gy EBRT pre op

• Deliver remainder at operation

Best practice?

1-507-284-2511