SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-G Crows Nest Utility … · 2018. 2. 27. · Construction Traffic Management Plan Crows Nest Utility Works – Addendum 1 SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-A1Construction

Construction Traffic Management Plan Crows Nest Utility Works – Addendum 1 Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works

Document No: SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐SCN‐CN‐PLN‐002301‐A1

DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED

BY REVIEWED BY

APPROVED BY

REMARKS

E 2 Jan 2018 S Lewis . Internal review

F 15 Jan 2018 S Lewis N Bryant For external review

G 8 Feb 2018 S Lewis N Bryant T Ferrero For approval

H 9 Feb 2018 S Lewis N Bryant T Ferrero For approval

Signature:

CTMP - Crows nest Utility Works - Addendum 1

Tino / SueIn accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South West the Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & South West Construction Traffic Management Plan – Crows Nest Utility Works – Addendum 1 - TSE Works Rev H SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301 to detail Crows Nest utility works subject to the following requirements:

• Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) and/or speed limit reductions from theTransport Management Centre (TMC) as required;

• Shall apply to and obtain approval from Roads and Maritime Ser5vices for Road openingpermit for any required backfilling standards and depth of conduits required below surfacepavement level

• Ensure communications with RMS’s Camera Enforcement branch and Network Operationsto ensure operational-ability of RMS camera at all times and TCS asset on the PacificHighway and Hume Street

• Addressing any safety issues identified within the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;· Addressing any issues raised by Council, STA, Taxi Council, residents/businesses and/or

Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;

• Maintaining pedestrian/cyclist safety at all times;• A revised TCP is required to be send to SCO which accurately reflects pedestrian footpath

closure/works identified in TCP-SCN-HUM-AL-0001; and• Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the

worksRegards

Giovanny RamirezAssociate Director Operations CBD & EastCBD Transport Taskforce | Sydney Coordination Office Transport for NSW

www.transport.nsw.gov.au

Transport for NSWSydney Coordination Office

RAMIREZ GiovannyMon 19/02/2018 1:06 PM

To:Tino Ferrero ; Sue Lewis ;

Cc:BERRY Adam ; ISSA Steven C ; SMITH Peta

Construction Traffic Management Plan Crows Nest Utility Works –Addendum 1

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-A1Construction Traffic Management Plan Crows Nest Utility Works – Addendum 1 Page 2 of 15

Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4

1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4

2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5 2.1. Pacific Highway ........................................................................................................... 6

3. Site operations ............................................................................................................ 6 3.1. Works Required ........................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................... 7

4. Other Considerations ................................................................................................. 8 4.1. Road Safety Audits ...................................................................................................... 8 4.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................... 9 4.3. Police and Emergency Services .................................................................................. 9 4.4. Communications and the community .......................................................................... 9 4.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 10 4.6. Environmental Management ..................................................................................... 10 4.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 10 4.8. References ................................................................................................................ 11

Appendix 1 Existing parking restrictions ......................................................................... 12 Appendix 2 Traffic control plans ....................................................................................... 13 Appendix 3 Road safety audit ............................................................................................ 14 Appendix 4 Review comments .......................................................................................... 15



Figures Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project ................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Crows Nest sites ....................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Telstra works ............................................................................................................. 5

Tables Table 1 Proposed Communications ......................................................................................... 9 Table 2: Stakeholder Consultation ......................................................................................... 10 Table 3: Site contacts ............................................................................................................. 10



1. Introduction

1.1. Project Overview

The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:

Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link,connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.

Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and

Bankstown.

Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages. Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project

1.2. Purpose of this Plan

The purpose of this Addendum to Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): CROWS NEST UTILITY WORKS – ADDENDUM 1 is to detail the site operations for this phase of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiative that will be deployed to minimise disruption to, and ensure the safety of the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists; public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.



2. Locality and existing conditions The Crows Nest (Station Excavation) sites are three distinct sites. The northern site is bounded by the Pacific Highway to the west, Oxley Street to the north, Clarke Lane to the east and Hume Street to the south. The southern site is bounded by Hume Street to the north, Clarke Lane to the east, 473 Pacific Highway to the south and the Pacific Highway to the west. The last site (Beaurepaires) bounded by Clarke Lane to the west, 20 Clarke Street to the north, Clarke Street to the east and Hume Street to the south. The three sites are shown in Figure 2 below in red. The existing parking restrictions at the site are detailed below and are also included in Appendix 1. Figure 2: Crows Nest sites

The Telstra works required for the site operations is shown in red on Figure 3 below.

Figure 3: Telstra works



2.1. Pacific Highway

Pacific Highway is classified as a state road which is under the control of RMS. It commences in North Sydney and continues north of the city. The speed limit on the Pacific Highway is 60km/hr. ½ P metered parking exists along most the frontage of the site, No Stopping restrictions exist at each signalised intersection. A bus zone is located immediately north of the Hume Street intersection and a mail zone is located south of the Hume Street intersection. Further south of the site, 1P metered parking exists. A transit lane (T3) is in operation on the southbound carriageway between 6AM-10AM. A safety camera is in place at the intersection with Hume Street. The bus stop services the following routes 143, 144, 252, 254, 257, 265, 286, 287, 290, 291 and M20. The effective width of the footpath is 2.2m (property boundary to face of kerb is 3.7m with 1.5m allocated to street furniture including a bus seating, trees and parking meters). There are no cycling facilities on this section of the Pacific Highway.

2.2. Hume Street

Hume Street is a local road which connects Albany Street to River Road. Hume Street is signalised at the intersection of the Pacific Highway. East of the highway metered parking exists on the northern side of Hume Street between the Pacific Highway and Clarke Street. The southern side of Hume Street is signposted as No Stopping between Clarke Lane and the Pacific Highway. A bus zone exists on the southern side of Hume Street between Clarke Lane and Clarke Street, which is used as a layover for Sydney Buses. No service information is provided at this bus stop. There are 2 lanes available for westbound traffic at the intersection with the Pacific Highway. There are right turn bans from the Pacific Highway into Hume Street in both directions. The southbound restriction exempts buses. The speed limit on Hume Street is 50km/hr. The effective width of the footpath is 2.0m (property boundary to face of kerb is 3.8m with 1.8m allocated to street furniture including parking meters and trees). There are no cycling facilities on this section of the Hume Street. West of the highway, No Parking 830AM-6PM M-F exists on the southern side of Hume Street for approximately 20m and a bus zone is signposted towards Nicholson Street. On the northern side, a bus zone exists between the Pacific Highway and Nicholson Place. Footpath widths are generally 3m. Cycling facilities do not exist on this section of Hume Street.

3. Site operationsDuration: 10 shifts Timing: February/ March 2018

3.1. Works Required

Th existing Telstra communications line is required to be relocated across the Pacific Highway to an existing Telstra pit on the western side of the Pacific Highway. The works are proposed to be undertaken via trenching as during site investigations the number of existing services surrounding this location have precluded the possibility of under boring.



Ausgrid cable jointing works are also required on the north-western corner of the Pacific Highway and Hume Street. The works will require the closure of the footpath and adjacent traffic lanes including a lane closure on Hume Street, west of the Pacific Highway. All works will be completed at night.

3.2. Operating Conditions

For the Telstra works, the existing parking lane will be taken out from 1900 when the northbound Clearway operations cease and as the works progress traffic will be shifted to suit the work site – refer to Appendix 2. For works on the southbound carriageway, the parking lane will be taken out as vehicles leave from 4PM onwards. For the Ausgrid works, the existing northbound parking lane will be taken out from 1900 when the northbound Clearway operations cease and as the night progresses the adjacent lane will be closed. The lane closure on Hume Street will be undertaken with the closure of the parking lane. Both works will require the diversion of pedestrian as noted in Section 3.2.3 and Appendix 2. There are no long-term changes proposed.

3.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flows

The operation of the site will have minimal impact on existing traffic conditions as it is proposed to undertake the works on high volume roads at night. The roads will be returned to its current operations by 0500 every morning. Steel plates may be used, but in most instances backfilling of the trench will be undertaken. In the event that steel plates are used they will be fixed using asphalt ramps or similar.

3.2.2. Impact on Public Transport

For the works (both Telstra and Ausgrid) on the northbound carriageway the existing bus stop south of the intersection of Hume Street will be closed for the duration of the works. There is an existing bus stop servicing all night time operating buses approximately 100m south of this stop. On the southbound carriageway the existing bus stop north of Hume Street will be relocated further north to the previously agreed location as shown on the relevant TCP within Appendix 2. This will be discussed with bus operators prior to implementation. During the Ausgrid works, the bus layover on the northern side of Hume Street between Nicholson Street and the Pacific Highway will be closed.

3.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists

There will be minor pedestrian diversions during the works, especially where works impact on the footpath area. Pedestrians will be diverted during works at the following locations:

Pacific Highway diverted to use the northern signalised crossing for the Telstra works Pacific Highway diverted to use the southern signalised crossing for the Ausgrid works Pacific Highway diverted into the parking lane during the Ausgrid works Hume Street between Pacific Highway and Nicholson Place during the Ausgrid works

There are no impacts on current on road cycle facilities.

3.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access

There is no impact on existing residential or commercial access arrangements.



3.2.5. Impacts on parking sensors

Parking sensors are located in the centre of the parking space. These sensors are visible from the road. We will survey the areas at least 2 weeks prior to commencement of works and identify any parking sensors that may be impacted. As part of the Street Opening permit we will nominate where parking sensors are to be impacted and arrange their removal if required or placement of a steel plate/ 20mm MBF board during the works.

3.2.6. Impacts on red light and speed camera operation

The trenching works for the Telstra relocation is through the current red-light camera loops on the Pacific Highway. The camera will be disabled for the duration of the works.

3.2.7. Cumulative impacts

There are no known work sites adjacent or within the immediate area which would impact on the current traffic and transport network.

3.2.8. Special Events

Crows Nest Fair is held typically in October on a Sunday between 10AM and 5PM. The fair will not be impacted by any of the utility works. In reviewing North Sydney Council’s website for special events near the site, there are no other special events listed, which would be impacted by the works.

3.2.9. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works

Works that have been identified as requiring a Traffic Control Plan are detailed below. Appendix 2 provides timing for implementation, the works being undertaken and the expected traffic impacts. 1. Traffic control on Pacific Highway and Hume Street

3.2.10. North Sydney Council required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring Council approval include: 1. Permit to stand plant/ crane2. Footpath occupation (building materials on footpath)3. Parking sensor removal (if required)4. Street opening permit

3.2.11. RMS required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring RMS approval include: 1. RMS asset numbers for the Pacific Highway trenching works

4. Other Considerations

4.1. Road Safety Audits

Road safety audit has been undertaken during the development of the CTMP. Refer to Appendix 3.



4.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast

A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.

4.3. Police and Emergency Services

The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.

4.4. Communications and the community

The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works. Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website. Table 1 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP Table 1 Proposed Communications

NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE

Community notice YES

Precinct update/ e-update YES

Email YES

Internet YES

Community information centre NO

On site briefings YES

Print advertising YES – Quarterly newsletter only

Variable message signs NO

Advanced warning signs YES

4.4.1. Travelling public

Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following:

Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes

and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable messagesigns (VMS), where identified on the plans.

Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs, where shown on theTCP



4.4.2. Stakeholders consulted

Table 2 identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP: Table 2: Stakeholder Consultation

STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE

TCG 9th Jan 2018 Presentation SCO/ TfNSW/ Councils/ RMS

RMS 15 Jan 2018 Submission of Addendum Peta Smith

North Sydney Council 15 Jan 2018 Submission of Addendum Michaela Kemp

SCO 15 Jan 2018 Submission of Addendum Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

TfNSW 15 Jan 2018 Submission of Addendum Berin Gordon

Centre for Road Safety 15 Jan 2018 Submission of Addendum Luke Wilby

TTLG 31 Jan 2018 Presentation SCO/ TfNSW/ RMS/ ES/ Councils/ other contractors

RMS 8 Feb 2018 Resubmission of Addendum Peta Smith/ Chao Chen

North Sydney Council 8 Feb 2018 Resubmission of Addendum Michaela Kemp

SCO 8 Feb 2018 Resubmission of Addendum Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

TfNSW 8 Feb 2018 Resubmission of Addendum Berin Gordon

4.5. Inspections and monitoring

The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours. Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.

4.6. Environmental Management

All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.

4.7. Site Contacts Table 3: Site contacts



NAME POSITION CONTACT #

Andrew Fam Utilities Engineer

Mario Menna Utilities Engineer

4.8. References

The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:

Construction Traffic Management Framework – TfNSW, v2.5 provided 22nd Dec 2017 Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301 Crows Nest Utility Works



Appendix 1 Existing parking restrictions DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION

SMCWSTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-DWG-002301-0000 Locality Plan and legend

SMCWSTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-DWG-002301-0001 Existing parking restrictions

SCALE:

OF

SCALEPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:22 October 2017 - 3:39 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\002301-CROWSNESTUTILITYWORKS\002301-TCP-0000-P1.DWG

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

SYDNEY METRO

SYDNEY METRO

CROWS NESTUTILITY RELOCATION WORKS

DRAWING INDEX

1 1

P1

LS

SS

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-DWG-002301-0001 EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-DWG-002301-0000 DRAWING INDEX & LOCALITY MAP

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0001 CLARKE ST PARKING AND FOOTPATH CLOSURE

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0002 CLARKE ST PARKING AND FOOTPATH CLOSURE

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0003 CLARKE LN CLOSURE AND 2 WAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0004 HUME ST LANE CLOSURE

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0005 HUME ST CONTRAFLOW NORTHERN WORK SITE

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0006 HUME ST CONTRAFLOW SOUTHERN WORK SITE

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0007 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SLOW LANE CLOSURE AT HUME ST

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-TCP-002301-0008 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SLOW LANE CLOSURE AT WILOUGHBY RD

DRAWING NUMBER TITLE

N.T.S

SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE

20100 40 50m30

SCALE:

OF

SCALEPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:22 October 2017 - 3:37 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\002301-CROWSNESTUTILITYWORKS\DWG-0001-EXISTINGPARKINGCONDITIONS\002301-DWG-0001-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

SYDNEY METRO

SYDNEY METRO

CROWS NESTEXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS 1 1

P1

LS

SS

11 x PARKING BAY

1

2

P PARKING

10:00-18:00 M-F

08:30-12:30 SAT

NO STOPPINGMOTORCYCLE PARKINGMETERED PARKINGBUS ZONEMAIL ZONE

2 x PARKING BAY

1

2

P PARKING

08:30-18:00 M-F

08:30-12:30 SAT

2 x PARKING BAY

1

4

P PARKING

08:30-18:00 M-F

08:30-12:30 SAT

12 x PARKING BAY

1P PARKING

08:00 - 00:00 M-F

08:30 - 12:30 SAT

2 x PARKING BAY

2P PARKING

08:30-18:00 M-F

08:30-12:30 SAT



Appendix 2 Traffic control plans

TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS

TCP-SCN-HUM-AL-0001

Hume Street

Pacific Highway

Nicholson Place

Nights Pedestrian detour Ausgrid cable jointing

Minimal impacts as works are undertaken at night and pedestrians diverted for approximately 100m

TCP-SCN-HUM-EB-120001

Hume Street

Pacific Highway

Nicholson Street

Nights Eastbound kerbside lane closure

Ausgrid cable jointing

Minimal impacts as works are undertaken at night Bus layover closed

TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-230001

Pacific Highway

Hume Street South of Hume Street

Nights Double fast lane (both directions) closure

Telstra road trenching

Minimal impacts as works are undertaken at night Bus stops closed both directions

TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-230001

Pacific Highway


Nights Double lane closure northbound


Minimal impacts as works are undertaken at night Bus stop closed


Pacific Highway

North of Hume Street

South of Hume Street

Nights Double lane closure northbound




Hume Street

Pacific Highway

East of Nicholson Street

Nights Eastbound kerbside and double lane closure northbound


Minimal impacts as works are undertaken at night Bus layover closed

TCP-SCN-PAC-SB-230001

Pacific Highway


Nights Double lane closure southbound



NOT T

O SCA

LE

N

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE

AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER

700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING

LEGEND

PEDESTRIAN DIVERSIONROUTE

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE:10/11/2017REV 1: 04/01/2018REV 2: 25/01/2018REV3: 08/02/2018

*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.

*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.

*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.

*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)

Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP

Team Leader (Onsite):

Signature:

Date:

Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)

Ticket No:

Reasons for modification:

Email to: [email protected]

AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NESTHUME ST, CROWS NEST(BTW NICHOLSON ST & PAC HWY

TCP-SCN-HUM-AL-0001

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:CERTIFICATE NO:SIGNATURE:PLAN CHECKED BY:CERTIFICATE NO:SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA0044399691

SUE LEWIS0022818927

HUME

STRE

ET

HUME

STRE

ET

HUME

STRE

ET

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

NICHOLSON PLACE

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

PEDESTRIANS

T8-2R

USE OTHER

FOOTPATH

T8-3

FOOTPATH

CLOSED

T8-4

USE O

THER

FOOT

PATH

T8-3

FOOT

PATH

CLOS

ED

T8-4

PEDE

STRIA

NS

T8-2L

NOTE:

1. Traffic controllers to assist pedestrians around work area

www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HW

CLARKE LN

ARKE LN

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NO

THRO

UGH

ROAD

NO

NICHOLSON PL

NICHO

LSON

PL

LAMON

T ST

30M

MERGE

TAPER

20M

BUFFER

ZONE

T5-550M

50M

T2-6-1

50M

ROAD

WORK

ON SID

E ROA

D

T1-25

50M

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

NOT T

O SCA

LE

N

BUS LAYOVERCLOSED

END

ROAD

WOR

K

T2-1

6

END

ROAD W

ORK

T2-16

END

ROAD WORK

T2-16

60M

60M

T1-5-2 *

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE: 10/11/2017REV 1: 04/01/2018REV 2: 25/01/2018







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND

1 OF 1



ABDULLAH KHAN0032576588

CROWS NEST

HUME ST, CROWS NEST


www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

FALCON ST

FALCON ST

WIL

LOU

GH

BY L

N

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

ALEX

AND

ER S

T

ALEX

AND

ER S

T

BURLINGTON ST

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

CLARKE ST

CLARKE ST

HU

ME

LNH

UM

E LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

HU

ME ST

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

OXLE

Y ST

OXLE

Y ST

OXL

EY S

T

POLE LN

POLE LN

ALBANY ST

ALBANY ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NO

THRO

UGH

ROAD

NO

NICHOLSON PL

NICHO

LSON

PL

LAMON

T ST

SHIRL

EY RD

SINCLAIR ST

BRUC

E ST

BUS ZONERELOCATEDFROM NEARHUME ST

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

T1-224 *

40ROADWORKR4-212

KEEPCLEAR

KEEP CLEAR

50M

40M

BUS STOPCLOSED

USE EXISTINGBUS STOP

30MBUFFER

ZONE

60MMERGETAPER

60M

MERG

E

TAPER

60M

60M

60M

T5-5

T1-22

4 *

40RO

AD

WORK

R4-212

NIGHT

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

T1-223

*

60M

MER

GE

TAPE

R

T5-5

60M

60M

60M

T2-6

-1

T2-6-2

T1-2

24 *

40 ROAD

WO

RK

R4-2

12

NIG

HTRO

ADW

ORK

AHEA

D

T1-2

23 *

50M

50M

T1-224 *

40ROAD

WORK

R4-212

ROAD WORK ON SID

E ROADT1-25

50M

50M

ROAD WORK ON SIDE ROADT1-25

T1-224 *

40ROADWORK

R4-212

NIGHT

ROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

50M

T5-5

T2-6-2

T1-2

00-3

*

PREP

ARE

TO

STOP

T1-1

8

30M

MERG

E

TAPE

R

40M

T2-6

-1

50M

ROAD

WO

RK

ON

SIDE

RO

AD

T1-2

5

T1-2

24 *

40RO

AD

WORK

R4-21

2

40M

ROAD

WORK

ON SID

E ROA

D

T1-25

END

ROAD W

ORK

T2-16

50M

50M

END

ROAD

WO

RK

T2-1

6

60M

MERGE

TAPER

90M

(1.5D

TAPER)

60MM

ERGETAPER

60M

60M

60M

NIG

HT

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EAD

T1-223 *

T1-2

24 *

40RO

ADW

ORK

R4-212

T2-6-2

T5-5

T5-5

T5-5

T5-5

T5-5

50M

PREPARE

TO

STOP

T1-18

T1-200-3*

T2-6-2

50M

50M

50M

T1-224 *

40ROADWORKR4-212

T1-2

24 *40 R

OAD

WOR

K

R4-2

12

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

ROAD WORK ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

PEDESTRIANS

T8-2LFOOTPATH

CLOSED

T8-4

USE OTHER

FOOTPATHT8-3

PEDE

STRIA

NS T8-2

R

USE O

THER

FOOT

PATH

T8-3

FOOT

PATH

CLOS

ED

T8-4

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND


SAFETY BARRIER

NOT T

O SCA

LE

N

END

ROAD WORK

T2-16

60

R4-1

END

ROAD

WOR

K

T2-1

6

60

R4-1

40M

40M

ROAD WORK ON S

IDE ROAD

T1-25

T1-224 *

40ROAD

WORK

R4-212

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NEST

PACIFIC HWY, CROWS NEST

DATE: 20/12/2017REV 1: 01/01/2018 REV 2: 25/01/2018

1 OF 1

PACIFIC HWY



SUE LEWIS0022818927


NOTES:

1. Traffic cone placement to provide for vehicles turning movement.

2. Bus stop closure signs to be installed prior to works.

3. Traffic controller to close parking lane with cones post the PM peak clearway restrictions.

50M

ROAD

WO

RK

ON

SIDE

RO

AD

T1-2

5

www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

CLARKE ST

HU

ME

LNH

UM

E LN

CLARKE LN

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON PL

NICHO

LSON

PL

LAMON

T ST

SHIRL

EY RD

KEEPCLEAR

KEEP CLEAR

BUS STOPCLOSED

30M

BUFF

ER

ZONE

60M

MERG

E

TAPE

R

60M

60M

60M

NIGHT

ROAD

WORK

AHEA

D

T1-223

*

T1-2

24 *

40RO

AD

WORK

R4-21

2

T2-6-

2

T5-5

PREP

ARE

TO

STOP

T1-1

8

T1-2

00-3

*

END

ROAD

WO

RK

T2-1

6

END

ROAD

WOR

K

T2-1

6

60

R4-1

PEDESTRIANS

T8-2LFO

OTPATH

CLO

SED

T8-4

USE OTHER

FOOTPATH

T8-3

PEDE

STRIA

NS T8-2

R

USE O

THER

FOOT

PATH

T8-3

FOOT

PATH

CLOS

ED

T8-4

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NEST


DATE: 20/12/2017REV 1: 01/01/2018 REV 2: 25/01/2018

1 OF 1

PACIFIC HWY



SUE LEWIS0022818927



NOTES:

1. Traffic controllers to assist pedestrians.


3. Traffic controller to close parking lane at 7PM post PM clearway restrictions.

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND


SAFETY BARRIER

NOT TO SCALE

N

www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

CLARKE ST

CLARKE ST

HU

ME

LNH

UM

E LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

E ST

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

OXLE

Y ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NO

THRO

UGH

ROAD

NO

NICHOLSON PL

NICHO

LSON

PL

LAMON

T ST

SHIRL

EY RD

SIN

KEEPCLEAR

KEEP CLEAR

BUS STOPCLOSED

30M

BUFF

ER

ZONE

60M

MERG

E

TAPE

R

60M

60M

60M

NIGHT

ROAD

WORK

AHEA

D

T1-223

*

40RO

AD

WORK

T2-6-

2

T5-5

PREP

ARE

TO

STOP

T1-1

8

T1-2

00-3

*

END

ROAD

WO

RK

T2-1

6

END

ROAD

WOR

K

60

PEDE

STRI

ANS

FOO

TPAT

H

CLO

SED

USE

OTHE

R

FOOT

PATH

PEDESTRIANS

USE OTHER

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH

CLOSED


WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND


SAFETY BARRIER

NOT TO SCALE

N

30M

MERGE

TAPER

50M

50M

BUS LAYOVERCLOSED

T1-224 *

40ROADWORKR4-212

T2-6

-1

50M

50MRO

AD WO

RK

ON SID

E ROA

D

T1-25

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

T5-5

50M

30M

ROAD

WOR

K

ON S

IDE

ROAD

T1-2

5T1

-224

*40 ROA

D

WORK R4-2

12

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NEST


DATE: 20/12/2017REV 1: 01/01/2018 REV 2: 25/01/2018

1 OF 1

PACIFIC

HW

Y



SUE LEWIS0022818927


NOTES:



3. Traffic controller to close parking lane with cones post the PM peak clearway restrictions.


END

ROAD W

ORK

T2-16

www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

CLARKE ST

CLARKE ST

HU

ME

LNH

UM

E LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

UM

E ST

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

OXLE

Y ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NO

THRO

UGH

ROAD

NO

NICHOLSON PL

NICHO

LSON

PL

LAMON

T ST

SHIRL

EY RD

SIN

KEEPCLEAR

KEEP CLEAR

BUS STOPCLOSED

30M

BUFF

ER

ZONE

60M

MERG

E

TAPE

R

60M

60M

60M

NIGHT

ROAD

WORK

AHEA

D

T1-223

*

40RO

AD

WORK

T2-6-

2

T5-5

PREP

ARE

TO

STOP

T1-1

8

T1-2

00-3

*

END

ROAD

WO

RK

T2-1

6

END

ROAD

WOR

K

60

PEDE

STRI

ANS

FOO

TPAT

H

CLO

SED

USE

OTHE

R

FOOT

PATH


WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND


SAFETY BARRIER

NOT TO SCALE

N

30M

MERGE

TAPER

50M

50M

BUS LAYOVERCLOSED

40ROADWORK

T2-6

-1

50M

50M

ROAD

WORK

ON SID

E ROA

D

T1-25

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

T5-5

50M

30M

ROAD

WOR

K

ON S

IDE

ROAD

T1-2

5

40 ROA

D

WORK

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NEST


DATE: 20/12/2017REV 1: 01/01/2018 REV 2: 25/01/2018

1 OF 1

PACIFIC

HW

Y



SUE LEWIS0022818927


NOTES:



END

ROAD W

ORK

T2-16

USE OTHER

FOOTPATHT8-3

FOOTPATH

CLOSED

AHEAD

PEDESTRIANS

T8-2L

www.invarion.com

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

PACIFIC HWY

RD

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

WIL

LOU

GH

BY R

D

CLARKE ST

CLARKE ST

HU

ME

LNH

UM

E LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

CLARKE LN

HU

ME ST

HUME

ST

HUME

ST

OXLE

Y ST

OXLE

Y ST

OXL

EY S

T

POLE LN

POLE LN

ALBANY ST

ALBANY ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHOLSON ST

NICHO

NO

THRO

UGH

ROAD

NO

NICHOLS

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND


SAFETY BARRIER

NOTES:



40M

BUS ZONERELOCATEDFROM NEARHUME ST

BUS STOPRELOCATED TO NORTH 40M

60M

MERGE

TAPER

60M

60M

60M

NIGHT

ROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

T1-224 *

40ROAD

WORK

R4-212

T2-6-2

30M

MERG

E

TAPE

R

41.1 m

51.4 m

49.8 m

50.7 m

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

T2-6

-1

T1-2

24 *

40RO

AD

WORK

R4-21

2

ROAD

WO

RK

ON

SIDE

RO

AD

T1-2

5

T5-5

50M

50M

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

ROAD

WOR

K

ON SI

DE RO

AD

T1-2

5

END

ROAD W

ORK

T2-16

END

ROAD WORK

T2-16

60

R4-1

50M

50M

ROAD WORK

ON SIDE ROAD

T1-25

T1-224 *

40ROADWORKR4-212

PEDESTRIANS

T8-2LFO

OTPATH

CLO

SED

T8-4

USE OTHER

FOOTPATH

T8-3

PEDE

STRI

ANS

T8-2

R

USE

OTHE

R

FOOT

PATH

T8-3

FOO

TPAT

H

CLO

SED

T8-4

40M

ROAD

WORK

ON SID

E ROA

D

T1-25

NOT T

O SCAL

E

N

END

RO

AD

WO

RK

T2-1

6

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

CROWS NEST


DATE: 20/12/2017REV 1: 01/01/2018 REV 2: 25/01/2018

1 OF 1

PACIFIC HWY



SUE LEWIS0022818927

TCP-SCN-PAC-SB-23001

www.invarion.com



Appendix 3 Road safety audit

RSA-06721

Page 1 of 14 Crow’s Nest Utility Works

Road Safety Audit Report SHORT FORMAT

Title / Project Crow’s Nest Utility Works RSA P/L Reference RSA-06721 Work Package Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Report Date 22 January 2018 Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) Auditor

Secondary Auditor / Reviewer Bob Cumming Anthea Jennings, Chris Keramidas

Client John Holland CPB Ghella TMP / Drawings TCP-SCN-HUM-AL-0001 TCP-SCN-HUM-EB-120001 TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-23001 TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23001 TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23002 TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23003 TCP-SCN-PAC-SB-23001

Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L

Desktop TMP Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.

RSA-06721


Crow’s Nest Utility Works

T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion John Holland CPB Ghella

Contact: Response x Status y

Headers*****

1. Signage: Each of the drawings in the set have traffic controllers present but do not have traffic controller warning signs for all approaches. (Some examples are shown below)

Include warning signs when traffic controllers are present and may be on the road.

Drawings amended to include signage where appropriate

Closed

No signage No signage on the side road approach. No signage on the Hume St approach.

RSA-06721


Crow’s Nest Utility Works T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion

John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:

Response x Status y Headers*****

2. Signage: Some of the drawings do not have end roadworks signage present for the roads with turn lane closures. (Drawing TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-23001 as an example.)

Include end roadworks signage for all roads with works.

Drawings amended to include signage where appropriate

Closed

No end roadworks displayed after the intersection for through traffic.

RSA-06721





3. Speed limits: A number of the drawings have speed reductions to 40km/h within the site / closures. (TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-23001 as an example)

Extend 40km/h to before merges and site works.

Drawings amended Closed

RSA-06721





4. Swept Paths: For drawings TCP-SCN-PAC-SB-23001, TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23002 and 23003 the left hand turn from Hume St onto the Pacific Hwy may not have the space required to safely make the turn. If motorists swing wide in order to the make the turn they may encroach into oncoming traffic lanes.

Review swept paths for these movements.

If encroachment is likely, suggest reducing the speed limit of approaching traffic.

Note placed on drawing to highlight swept paths and traffic cone placement

Closed

RSA-06721





5. Speed limits / merges: The TCP-SCN-PAC-SB-23001 and NB 23001 drawings show a speed reduction to 40km/h during a 2-lane merge over a distance of approximately 60m. 1. The 40km/h is too close to the works to be

effective as some drivers will not slow until they pass the sign. At which point they will be well into to site.

2. 60m is considered to be short for a merger of 3

lanes to 1 at what can be taken as between 40-60km/h. This can cause a higher chance of side swipe collisions.

1. Relocate the 40km/h sign well before the start of the merges.

2. Typically, merges are set up one lane at a time with a straight in between the two merges.

3. Suggest closing the left lane before the intersection with Oxley St (SB). so that during the next block only 1 lane is required to close here

Point 1: drawing amended Point 2 – Lane 1 is actually a parking lane outside of peak hours so the merge is actually a 2 to 1 Point 3 – refer to point 2

Closed

RSA-06721





6. Traffic Controllers: The role of the traffic controllers in drawing NB-23002 is unclear.

Ensure that the traffic controllers are not required to controller more than one lane per person.

Noted – where appropriate notes have been added to the drawings

Closed

RSA-06721





7. Bus Stop: The plans show two active bus stops during the northbound lane closure / merge on Pacific Hwy. if stopping buses obstruct the only through lane, some drivers may cross the centreline.

Monitor. As noted on the drawings, the northern most bus stop is to be closed and buses will stop in the existing parking lane at the southern end of the site

Closed

RSA-06721





8. Signage: Some of the signage on drawing TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-23001 could be misleading as it is not relevant to the traffic at that location.

Consider removing the highlighted signage.

Drawings amended Closed

RSA-06721





9. Signage: Signage on Alexander St (TCP-SCN-PAC-AL-23001) may be misunderstood as it not indicative of conditions for that roadway.

Relocate road works warning sign closer to the intersection. Relocate lane status sign to after the right turn from Alexander St has been completed.

Drawing amended Closed

RSA-06721





10. Speed limit: On drawing EB-120001 the offset of the works on the traffic lane may require reductions to the speed limit.

Review worker offset from traffic and reduce speeds if necessary.

This is a low speed environment coming into a signalised intersection – no change required

Closed

11. TMAs: TMA positions on plan AL-23001 with respect to lane line northbound are ok. For southbound traffic the TMA should be positioned so that it protects the worksite area ahead.

The TMAs should straddle the lane line to be mostly in the lane adjacent to traffic.

This is not a TMA but the vehicle has been repositioned as suggested

Closed

RSA-06721





12. Work zones: Work zones are close to Hume St westbound traffic. Drawings NB-23001 to 23003 and SB - 23001

Add roadwork signage and reduce speed if necessary for the workers offset.

This is a low speed environment coming into a signalised intersection – no change required

Closed

13. Signage: The lane status sign shown below may be misleading to drivers if the right turn is allowed. Drawings NB23003 northbound to Hume St andSB23001 westbound and southbound to from Hume St

If a right is allowed consider adding an arrow as below.

As lane status signs have no legal meaning we have used through arrows to denote the lane(s) available. All turning movements allowed at intersections remain available

Closed

RSA-06721


RSA-06721


Explanatory Notes

Short Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness. It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections. The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it. Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history. Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team. X

Response: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion) Y

Status: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’. Language: o Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other

points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity. o ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar. o ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups. o ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative

action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders. o ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and

high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring. o ‘Minor’: Typically, a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash. o ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding. Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide above. References: Construction: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. Road Management Act 2004 – Code of Practice – Worksite Safety – Traffic Management (2010), and Design: 4. Austroads guidelines and VicRoads supplements and technical publications as relevant. Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’. Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews. Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience, views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.



Appendix 4 Review comments

Document: SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-E Crows Nest Utility Works Addendum 1Version: Addendum 1Date of review: 9/02/2018

Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer DateItem Description,

Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response DateResponse Status

(date) RMS response (date) Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 section 3.2 Parking arrangement will be managed under ROLs? Or Council approval? Both 9/02/2018 comment closed

2 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 section 3.2.2 Closing Bust stop(northbound Pacific Hwy) and Bus layover require STA approval Noted 9/02/2018 comment closed

3 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 section 3.2.3Bus stop relocation agreed by STA previously, however require STA to provide their agreement with the arrangement under this CTMP.

Noted and included 9/02/2018comment closed

4 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 section 3.2.6

Trenching through current redlight campera loop? Will this affect the camera operation? Evidents of approval need to be provided from the relevant authority

Yes - RMS is the relevant authority - acontact person would be appreciated 9/02/2018

TSE contractor to contact Frank Chan (RMS camera 0439 419 044 email: [email protected] ) to confirm the details of scope. TSE contractor shall provide accurate date to RMS in relation to when the red light camera loop will be disabled and the date when the loops can be reinstated. TSE contractor is liable for the cost associated with reinstatement works.

noted and agreed - refer to Appendix 4 for email to RMS confirming works

5 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23001Merge taper length to be checked,Check if bus stop will be impacted and how bus access/egress is managed?

Already confirmed arrangements as perTCP 9/02/2018 comment closed

6 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 TCP-SCN-PAC-NB-23002Merge taper length to be checked,Check if bus stop will be impacted and how bus access/egress is managed?

Already confirmed arrangements as perTCP 9/02/2018 comment closed

7 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 09-Feb-2018 Appendix 3 RSA to be included Noted and included 9/02/2018 comment closed

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information

Red light camera at the intersection of Pacific Highway and Hume Street

Frank/ Chao

as discussed this afternoon, our current commencement date is 19 February 2018 and our completion date for the works is 5 March 2018.

I understand that RMS will be responsible for installation of the loops and that an invoice will be provided to me post the works. TSE Contractor agrees to this arrangement. it is also agreed that RMS will provide their own traffic control for the works and that TSE will include the works in our community notification. RMS will gain their own ROL for the works through TMC.

As discussed we are limited by our Environment Protection License to 3 nights of work per week. I will provide you with a program of our works so that your reinstatement works can occur on the same nights as our works, where the physical locations do not clash. I will provide this program as close as possible to the commencement date of our trenching works to allow RMS to allocate the appropriate resources.

Regards

Sue

Sue LewisFri 9/02/2018 2:38 PM

To:Frank.CHAN; Chao Chen

Cc:Gene O'Sullivan Nathan Bryant ; Declan Mc Garry

Sydney Metro TSE – Construction Traffic Management Plans – Crows Nest Feb 2018

1 of 2

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

It is recommended that the traffic aspects of the Construction Traffic Management Plan be approved, subject to the following conditions:

1. All works on Hume Street, Clarke Lane, Oxley Street, Pacific Highway, Clarke Street andany public road are to be undertaken in accordance with AS 1742.3

2. Approval must be obtained from Council for all temporary construction vehicular crossings3. If the removal of parking meters and/or in-ground sensors is deemed necessary by Council

to protect the infrastructure or for public safety, the applicant shall pay for the cost ofremoval.

4. Installation of a Work Zone/ No Stopping Zone for Sydney Metro – Crows Nest TSE issubject to the applicant paying all appropriate Council advertised fees and charges,including the cost of the signage.

5. If required, the residents/occupiers of Oxley Street are to be notified by letter that a NoStopping zone on Oxley Street is to be installed in conjunction with traffic signal changesat Oxley Street/ Pacific Highway. The letter should indicate the length of the No StoppingZone, the existing parking restrictions the No Stopping Zone will replace and the durationof the No Stopping Zone. A copy of the notification is to be provided to Council beforethe signs are installed. The notification is to have the name and number of the sitemanager in case of complaints.

6. Trucks may only enter and leave the construction site in a forwards direction, unless underthe direct supervision of two RMS accredited traffic controllers, one to direct heavy vehiclemovement in and out of the site and one to ensure no pedestrian enters the path of a heavyvehicle.

7. Accesses to adjoining properties are to be maintained at all times, unless agreed otherwisewith the affected party and Council

8. The adjoining/ affected residents/occupiers are to be updated on a regular basis and at keydemolition stages, particularly in relation to construction vehicle movements, and beprovided with a phone number to contact the site manager, and in accordance with theSydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works Areas noted in red are notapplicable to these works

9. At no time shall Hume Street, Clarke Lane, Oxley Street, Pacific Highway, Clarke Streetor any other road or Council property be blocked by any vehicle or works associated withthe construction of the proposed development. Through traffic on Hume Street, ClarkeLane, Oxley Street, Pacific Highway, Clarke Street and any other road is to be maintainedat all times, unless agreed otherwise with RMS/ SCO and Council

10. Hume Street, Clarke Lane, Oxley Street, Pacific Highway, Clarke Street, or any other roadare not to be used as a waiting area for trucks delivering to or awaiting pick up of materialsetc. from the proposed development.

11. Construction vehicles are not to queue on Hume Street, Clarke Lane, Oxley Street, PacificHighway, Clarke Street or any other road. Unless approved by the relevant road authority

12. Any approved Works Zone is to be used only to pick up and drop off materials andequipment. Construction vehicles are not to wait or park in the Works Zone.

13. Materials are to be stored on-site. At no time, are materials to be stored on Hume Street,Clarke Lane, Oxley Street, Pacific Highway, Clarke Street or any other road or any Councilproperty, unless approved by Council.

14. Mobile cranes shall be located wholly on-site or with an approved Stand Plant Permit15. Concrete pumps shall be located wholly on-site or with an approved Stand Plant Permit,

unless the pump and trucks can stand wholly within the signposted Work Zone.

Sydney Metro TSE – Construction Traffic Management Plans – Crows Nest Feb 2018

2 of 2

16. All pump lines crossing Council footpaths must be ramped over to allow safe pedestrian/wheelchair traffic at all times.

17. Pedestrian access and the diversion of pedestrians shall be carried out in accordance withAustralian Standard 1742.3 and 1742.10.

18. If pedestrians are diverted, pram ramps must be provided in accordance with AustralianStandard 1428.1.

19. If a Permit to Stand Plant or Temporary Road Closure is required, application must be madeto NSW Police, Harbourside Local Area command.

20. If a Permit to Stand Plant is required, application must be made to Council a minimum oftwo weeks prior to any proposed works.

21. If a Temporary Road Closure is required, application must be made to Council a minimumof three weeks prior to any proposed works.

22. Should any street trees be impacted by these works then Council’s Tree ManagementOfficer must be consulted at least 2 weeks prior to any works proceeding. Phone 9936 8100.

23. A traffic route map and conditions are to be made available to truck drivers engaged forthis development.

24. A list of truck drivers’ names with their licences and vehicle plate numbers and conditionsare to be kept on-site by the applicant at all times, and be made available for inspection byCouncil Officers, Police Officers and Council Rangers.

25. Repeated failure to comply with these conditions will result in removal of any Work Zoneunder notice.

26. All Traffic Management Plans and Traffic Control Plans must be endorsed with the nameof the person preparing the plan along with their level of certified qualification andcertificate number. Only persons with current “Select/Modify Traffic Control Plans” or“Design Audit Traffic Control Plans” tickets are qualified to develop and endorseTraffic Management Plans and Traffic Control Plans

Please note the construction management program is a condition that forms part of the development application for the site. Therefore any non-compliance with these construction management program conditions of approval constitutes a breach of the conditions of approval for the development application.

Hi Sue,

I have no objections and have advised Op’s accordingly. Please note that the Hume Street stop will be extended and required when the Epping to Chatswood rail line is closed later this year. Can you keep this in mind when planning occurs in this area.

Thanks & regards

Craig

From: Sue Lewis Sent: Monday, 22 January 2018 7:54 AMTo: DUNN Craig; PASSARELLI Frankie; Michael_PerroneSubject: Crows Nest Utility CTMP Amendment

Gents

Are you able to review the attached?the section detailing public transport impacts is 3.2.2

TCP for the works are shown in Appendix 2 - happy to meet on site or in your office if need be to walk you through the proposal

Regards

Sue

RE: Crows Nest Utility CTMP Amendment

DUNN Craig Tue 30/01/2018 8:46 AM

To:Sue Lewis PASSARELLI Frankie Michael_Perrone

Re: Crows Nest Utility CTMP Amendment

Gents

Are you able to review the attached?the section detailing public transport impacts is 3.2.2

TCP for the works are shown in Appendix 2 - happy to meet on site or in your office if need be to walk you through the proposal

Regards

Sue

Michael_PerroneMon 29/01/2018 11:15 AM

To:Sue Lewis

Cc:craig.dunn PASSARELLI Frankie Egwin Herbert; Peter Whitney; Talita Brooks Patrick Wu; Luke Harradine; Ranjan Kaul Steve Harris;

1 attachments (3 MB)SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-E Crows Nest Utility Works Addendum 1.pdf;

Sue

Thank your email, STA have no objections to your amendment .Can you please advise dates and times that the layover in Hume St will be closed for STA buses.

RegardsMichael PerroneService Delivery ManagerState Transit Western Region

From: Sue Lewis <To: "craig.dunn PASSARELLI Frankie Michael PerroneDate: 22/01/2018 07:54 AMSubject: Crows Nest Utility CTMP Amendment

Item No

Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref TfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 Section 2 Figure 3 has a lot of information on it, making it hard to see the work area. Is it possible to clean the drawing up, maybe remove some of the unnecessary words/lines? Not possible to clean up the drawing

2 Section 2.1 As this addendum deals with impacts on both sides of the Pacific Highway then a description of the parking restrictions/Bus Zone locations could be included. Document amended

3 Section 3 When will the 10 shifts occur? What days? Is there a basic block program? This information will be provided via the Traffic Forecast and TCG

4 Section 3.1 Figure 3 is for Telstra works, can a Figure be provided for the Ausgrid works? The Ausgrid works are a trnench on the footpath adjcent to the Pacific Higwhay5 Section 3.2.1 Only a completion time is mentioned. What is the start time? That will be decided by TMC

6 Section 3.2.2 What signage will be placed at each bus stop to direct users to the alternate stop? Any advanced warning signage? Typically provided by SCO

7 Section 3.2.4 There is some parking NB near the restaurants, will it be affected? Yes but access is maintained to the businesses8 Section 3.2.6 What are the impacts on the red light camera and how will they be mitigated? Document amended

9 Section 3.2.11 RMS asset numbers, need RMS approval? This is how this section currently reads, it is not clear, please clarify This is separate to the CTMP and is for information only

10 Section 4.1 Road Safety Audit must be included Document now included

11Table 1 states VMS will not be used, this section (2nd dot point) states VMS will be used. Please review and confirm what will occur. Provide detail on VMS messages, timeframes and locations as required

No VMS prposed

12 TCPs do not show advance warning signs for cyclists and while pedestrian signage is shown it is not in advance, i.e. only directional. That is right as noted in this section

13 Section 4.4.2 Table 2 does not show any consultation with the TTLG as per Ministers Condition E77. Please ensure this CTMP is presented to the TTLG (as should all CTMPs) TTLG presentation 31 January 2018

14 Section 4.5 How will JHCPBG JV capture changes to the short term works, on the night? How will it "... provide records of the traffic control implemented." ? Checklists

15 Section 4.6 This section does not give any detail on how environmental maintenance will be undertaken. Refer to CEMP

16 Section 4.7 Will these engineers be on site? If not who is the on-site contact? Are these contacts night or day contacts? Yes

38 ALL TCPsInvestigate the location/start of the 40 ROADWORK speed zone, usually it starts before the merge, continues through site and it ended past the last cone and/or sign. See Section 3.6 and 8.2 of RMS's TC@Ws Manual

Drawings amended as per road safety auditor comments

17 Why is the crossing closed? There is no work area shown.Does the works area affect the bus stop EB on Hume St? Drawing amended

18 The detour route for pedestrians shows them heading in a direction different to the arrow on the PEDESTRAIN sign on the southern side of Hume St (NB) Drawing amended

Sydney Metro City & Southwest Stakeholder Comment Tracker

Section 4.4.1

TCP-SCN-HUM-AL-0001

19 Pedestrians are shown as crossing mid way along Hume St. This location is uncontrolled, has no signage, cars may be parked there and it is not lighted. Please review and rectify Traffic controllers will assist pedestrians at this location

20 There is no bus stop closure signage shownThe signs directing bus users to alternate site are not shownSigns associated with bus stop closures are provided by SCO - note added to drawings where relevant

21 Does this work occur the same time as the previous TCP? If so how is the pedestrian detour (from the previous TCP) managed? No

22 One traffic controller icon is shown, does this mean one traffic controller will manage both ends of the work site or will there be two traffic controllers? TC will set up lane closure then monitor

23 How will pedestrians be kept from entering site? TC will set up lane closure then monitor24 What are the worksite (traffic side) protection measures? Lane closure as noted on the drawing25 How will pedestrians be kept from entering site? By being detoured as noted on the drawing

26 What are the worksite (traffic side) protection measures? Especially at the intersection of Hume St Reduced speed limits, lane closures as noted on the drawings

27 PREPARE TO STOP signs are shown, but there are no traffic controllers shown. Is stop/slow occurring? If so signs are missing from a stop/slow sign setup. Drawings amended as per road safety auditor comments

28 There is a merge taper of 30m on Hume St. This section of Hume St is approx. 32m long. Review and addressTaper is only to close 1 lane which fits within the space available - no change required

29 Suggest moving the END ROADWORK and 60 speed sign north of Oxley St NB, to capture those leaving Oxley to head north Drawing amended


31 There are multiple signs installed together. See section 3.2.6 of RMS's TC@Ws Manual and Section 3.3.2 of AS1742.3

As noted in Section 3.2.6 "a maximum of three signs may be displayed together…if there is sufficient space available…use of a multiple sign may not be appropriate where the speed of passing traffic is high or the lateral offset of the sign is near acceptable limits" in all instances the use of multiple sign displays has been carefully considered. it is noted that no issues were raised by the road safety auditor.

32 Several non-standard signs are shown. Will JHCPBG JV be making these signs? If not please update the TCP accordingly. IF so, they may require RMS approval before use.It is unclear what signs are not Non-standard. RMS are also a reviewer of these TCP

33 A note states "remove parking from 7pm" How will this be done? By the authorised traffic controller placing cones at the end of the PM clearway restrictions

34 Taper NB south of Shirley Rd appears to close two lanes. See TCP 101 in RMS's TC@Ws Manual and adjust accordinglyTaper is only to close 1 lane as a parking lane exists outside of the clearway restrictions

35Lane status signs on Shirley Rd and Alexander St may give the motorist the wrong message, as they are so far from the actual closure; even more so if the motorist is turning in a direction that is away from the closure.

Drawing amended as per Road Safety Auditor's comments

36The northbound bus stop on the Pacific Highway, north of Falcon Street. is in the area where vehicles will be merging across to the kerb lane which could result in rear end crashes. The 40km/h sign should at least be moved to the intersection of Falcon Street.

Drawing amended as per Road Safety Auditor's comments

37Similarly for the relocated southbound stop. It also appears to be located in the area where vehicles will be moving across to the kerb lane. The 40km/h sign could be moved to the intersection with Oxley Street.

Drawing amended

39 How will pedestrians be kept from entering site? With traffic controllers

40 What are the worksite (traffic side) protection measures? Reduced speed limits, lane closures as noted on the drawings




41 There are multiple signs installed together. See section 3.2.6 of RMS's TC@Ws Manual and Section 3.3.2 of AS1742.3

As noted in Section 3.2.6 "a maximum of three signs may be displayed together…if there is sufficient space available…use of a multiple sign may not be appropriate where the speed of passing traffic is high or the lateral offset of the sign is near acceptable limits" in all instances the use of multiple sign displays has been carefully considered. it is noted that no issues were raised by the road safety auditor.

42

- Signs installed for stop/slow operation don’t appear to be installed in front of a traffic controllerposition- Will the TC managing pedestrians also undertake stop/slow, would suggest this would be difficult- How will traffic controllers be protected and lit (lighted) during work?- Does the stop/slow, if it is to occur, affect operation of the signals? Will flashing yellow signaloperation be required?

Drawing amended as no requirement for stop/ slowTraffic controllers are stationed on the footpath with existing intersection lightingNo stop/ slow required for these works

43 Taper NB south of Hume St appears to close two lanes. See TCP 101 in RMS's TC@Ws Manual and adjust accordinglyTaper is only to close 1 lane as a parking lane exists outside of the clearway restrictions

44 A non-standard lane status signs is shown. Will JHCPBG JV be making these signs? If not please update the TCP accordingly. IF so, they may require RMS approval before use.

As noted in TCAWS manual (page B-15) the TCAWS manual references AS 1742.3 Section 3.8.2a. This section in AS states:(a) The Lane Status signs shall be used where one or morelanes of a multilane roadway are closed. The Lane Statussigns shall be used only to give advance warning of laneclosures and not in lieu of adequate signing and delineationof the closure. The "bars" include the closed lanes while thearrows include lane available to traffic. This sign may bemade with removable and reversible symbols so that thenumber and location of each type can be varied to suit theparticular lane closure in operation.


46

-How will pedestrians be kept from entering site?- Pedestrian are exposed to traffic NB on northern side of Hume St. This alternate route should bere-considered, suggest sending p

Documents

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-G Crows Nest Utility … · 2018. 2. 27. · Construction Traffic Management Plan Crows Nest Utility Works – Addendum 1 SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-CN-PLN-002301-A1Construction