SMCSWTSE-JCG-SWL-TM-PLN-002305-C Marrickville ... · Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305Construction

Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works

Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works

Document No: SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐DSY‐TM‐PLN‐002305

DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED

BY REVIEWED BY

APPROVED BY

REMARKS

A 31/10/17 Sue Lewis . Internal review

B 6 Nov 17 S Lewis S Connor C D’Hondt External review

C 11/12/17 S Lewis T Ferrero C D’Hondt For approval

Signature:

Marrickville Pretunnelling Works CTMP - Sydney Metro

Tino / SueIn accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South West the Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & South West Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works - TSE Works Rev C SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305 for pretunnelling construction works subject to the following requirements:

• Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) from the Transport Management Centre(TMC) for any required lane closures and/or speed reduction;

• Addressing any safety issues identified in the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;The Construction Traffic Management Plan is reviewed upon approval of the TMPframework documentation to ensure it aligns with the approval;

• Addressing any issues raised by Council, STA, Taxi Council, residents/businesses,Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;

• Complying with haulage routes as approved by SCO/RMS and described in Appendix 4 ofthe CTMP;

Addressing any issues raised through Council’s traffic committee;The Construction Traffic Management Plan being updated as required prior to construction commencing to ensure consistency with the final Construction Traffic Management Framework when it is approved

• Pedestrian/cyclist safety is to be maintained at all times;• Access to commercial and residential properties is to be maintained safely at all times;• Any parking changes required are to be discussed and approved by Inner West Council

via the appropriate channels; and• Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the

worksRegards

Giovanny RamirezAssociate Director Operations CBD & EastCBD Transport Taskforce | Sydney Coordination Office Transport for NSW

www.transport.nsw.gov.au

Transport for NSWSydney Coordination Office

RAMIREZ GiovannyFri 22/12/2017 1:05 PM

To:Tino Ferrero Sue Lewis

Cc:BERRY Adam ; ISSA Steven C ; MELLA Carl


SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works Page 2 of 18

Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4

1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4

1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4

2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5

2.1. Edinburgh Road .......................................................................................................... 5

2.2. Murray Street ............................................................................................................... 5

2.3. Sydney Steel Road ...................................................................................................... 6

3. Site Operations ............................................................................................................ 6

3.1. Works Required ........................................................................................................... 6

3.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................... 7

4. Fleet Management ....................................................................................................... 9

4.1. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles ........................................................................... 9

4.2. Drivers and Operators ............................................................................................... 10

5. Other Considerations ............................................................................................... 10

5.1. Road Safety Audits .................................................................................................... 10

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................. 10

5.3. Police and Emergency Services ................................................................................ 10

5.4. Communications and the community ........................................................................ 10

5.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 11

5.6. Environmental Maintenance ...................................................................................... 12

5.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 12

Appendix 1 Parking restrictions ........................................................................................ 13

Appendix 2 Proposed site operations ............................................................................... 14

Appendix 3 Traffic control plans ....................................................................................... 15

Appendix 4 Haulage routes ................................................................................................ 16

Appendix 5 Road safety audit ............................................................................................ 17

Appendix 6 Review comments .......................................................................................... 18



Figures Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project ................................................................................................ 4

Figure 2: Marrickville site .......................................................................................................... 5

Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes .................................................................................................... 9

Tables Table 1 Average vehicle movements per hour ......................................................................... 7

Table 2 Proposed Communications ....................................................................................... 11

Table 3: Stakeholder consultation .......................................................................................... 11

Table 4: Site contacts ............................................................................................................. 12



1. Introduction

1.1. Project Overview

The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:

Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link, connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.

Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and

Bankstown.

Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages.

Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project

1.2. Purpose of this Plan

The purpose of this Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): MARRICKVILLE PRETUNNELLING CONSTRUCTION WORKS is to detail the site operations for this phase of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiative that will be deployed to minimise disruption to, and ensure the safety of the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists; public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.



2. Locality and existing conditions

The Marrickville site is bounded by Sydney Steel Road to the west, Edinburgh Road to the north, Sydenham rail corridor to the east and a water treatment area adjacent to Garden Street. The site is shown in Figure 2 below in red. The existing parking restrictions at the site are detailed below and are also included in Appendix 1.

Figure 2: Marrickville site

2.1. Edinburgh Road

Edinburgh Road is a local road under the care and control of Inner West Council. It commences at Bedwin Road and ends at Victoria Road in Enmore. The speed limit is 50km/hr. This area has substantial industrial land uses with high heavy vehicle use. Edinburgh Road is one of the main access points into the Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre and the industrial areas of Sydenham and Marrickville.

Roundabouts exist at the intersections of Railway Parade and Murray Street. significant drainage infrastructure and driveways exists on the southern side of Edinburgh Road.

There is a bus stop located between Murray Street and Sydney Steel Road on the southern side. exist on this section of Edinburgh Road, bus service 355 travels along Edinburgh Road.

Parking is typically unrestricted in the area, with No Stopping signposted at all intersections.

There is no on road cycling facility. The footpaths are 1.6m with verges typically located between the footpath and roadway (2.1m). there are no pedestrian crossing facilities along Edinburgh Road other than the use of the splitter islands located at the roundabouts

2.2. Murray Street

Murray Street is classified as a local road and is under the control of council. Murray Street commences at Victoria Road Enmore and ceases at the entry into the dive site. The speed limit on Murray Street is 50km/hr.

There are no bus stops on Murray Street. There are no restrictions on parking in this street.



The existing footpaths are approximately 3.7m wide. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Murray Street

2.3. Sydney Steel Road

Sydney Steel Road is a local road which connects Edinburgh Road to a pedestrian connection through to Shirlow Street. The State default speed limit of 50km/hr applies.

No Stopping restrictions exist at its intersection with Edinburgh Road, with a small amount of No Parking installed on the western side near Edinburgh Road intersection.

The existing footpaths are approximately 1m wide. The footpath on the western side disappears near the angle parking area. The footpath on the eastern side continues through to the pedestrian connection at the southern end of Sydney Steel Road. There are no cycling facilities on Sydney Steel Road, however, the pedestrian connection is used by cyclists to access Sydenham Road.

3. Site Operations

Duration: 11 months Timing: December 2017 to October 2018

3.1. Works Required

The existing fencing will remain in place from the DELTA demolition works. The current parking restrictions will be retained along the site frontages.

Access and egress is proposed from Sydney Steel Road and Murray Street. This access/ egress will utilise the previously approved access/ egress points.

Pretunnelling construction works will occur during normal construction hours of 0700-1800 Monday to Friday and 0800-1300 on Saturday.

Works include:

Piling works Dive excavation works Precast segment factory installation Removal of excavated and other material from site Concreting works Precast segment production Demolition of remaining structures Tree and vegetation removal Site hoarding Equipment installation including conveyors etc Amenities installation Driveway reconstruction

In the later stages of this period (from June/ July2018) offsite transportation of segments is planned to commence. Segments will be transported on semi-trailers which will enter and exit via Sydney Steel Road. There will be approximately 55 segment trucks per day leaving the site. These segment deliveries will use the haulage routes in Appendix 4. At this point, piling and dive excavation works will have been completed.



Utility works associated with the Marrickville Site but outside of the site are captured in SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-CN-PLN-002303 Marrickville Utility Works. Site establishment works are captured in SMCSWTSE-JCG-SWL-TM-PLN-002273 Marrickville Site Establishment.

3.2. Operating Conditions

The main access/ egress is proposed on Sydney Streel Road and Murray Street using existing driveways, that previously serviced industrial uses at the site and were approved for use for the DELTA Group demolition works. There will be approximately 2,200 truck movements per month, averaging 100 truck movements per day. There will be minimal truck numbers during the peak periods (AM and PM).

Changes to parking restrictions on Sydney Steel Road are proposed for this CTMP, refer to Appendix 1 for details on this proposed change.

Table 1 provides a comparison of the EIS and TSE traffic movements at the site. Saturday volumes are not stipulated in the EIS therefore no comparison has been provided. The Saturday volumes will typically be half of a normal work day

Table 1 Average vehicle movements per hour

TIME EIS LIGHT VEHICLES

TSE LIGHT VEHICLES

EIS HEAVY VEHICLES

TSE HEAVY VEHICLES

0700-1000 30 10 6 6

1000-1200 10 5 24 12

1200-1400 10 5 24 12

1400-1600 10 10 24 12

1600-1800 30 10 6 5

1800-0700 30 10 6 0

3.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flows

The operation of the site will have minimal impact on existing traffic conditions as the land uses previously located on Sydney Steel Road and Murray Street were industrial in nature with significant truck volumes throughout the day.

3.2.2. Impact on Public Transport

There is no long-term impact on public transport as there are no existing bus stops on Sydney Steel Road or Murray Street. Bus route 355 will not be impacted by the works as the route runs along Edinburgh Road with no bus stops adjacent to the sites.

3.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists

Sydney Steel Road is not a particularly friendly environment for either pedestrians or cyclists. There is an existing narrow (approximately 1m width) footpath on the eastern side of Sydney Steel Road. The existing footpath on the western side of Sydney Steel Road is also narrow (<1.6m) and disappears past the first driveway – from that point the angle parking area removes the current footpath so pedestrians on that side of the road share the roadway with vehicles. The main entry and exit point for works vehicles is proposed at the northern gate on Sydney Steel Road where pedestrian paths exist on both sides of the road.

There is an existing pedestrian/ cyclist connection between the southern end of Sydney Steel Road and Sydenham Road and Lillian Fowler Place, providing an alternative route for pedestrians to gain access over the rail lines and to the residential areas further west and south.



Murray Street is a dead end between Edinburgh Road and the driveway into Casa Del Desserts (102-112 Edinburgh Road) , it is highly likely that no pedestrians/ cyclists will use this section of Murray Street, other than those associated with the works.

3.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access

There is one commercial property on the southern end of Murray Street which will still be in operation, Casa Del Deserts. Access and egress for this business is only via Murray Street.

There are commercial properties on the western side of Sydney Steel Road (Unilever, Dairy Farmers etc with their main access to and from Edinburgh Road) it is unlikely that these works will impact these businesses. There are businesses on the eastern side of Sydney Steel Road which are still in operation. Businesses include the Inner West Gymnastics Club which has classes Monday through to Saturdays. Access to these properties will remain unchanged.

There are no residential properties within close proximity to the sites.

3.2.5. Staff parking and transportation to site

There are significant amounts of unrestricted parking available in both Murray Street and Sydney Steel Road, east of Edinburgh Road, however, workers will be encouraged to arrive by public transport. Sydenham Rail Station is 1.2km (15 minutes walking) from Sydney Steel Road and St Peters Rail Station is 950m (12 minutes walking).

3.2.6. Cumulative impacts

In reviewing Inner West Council’s website there are no significant developments currently going through the planning phase.

WestConnex has commenced works on Campbell Street and have intermittent closures of Campbell Street, east of Unwins Bridge Road. We will continue to liaise with WestConnex directly and through the Sydney Coordination Office on works that have the potential to impact on either project.

3.2.7. Special Events

Inner West Council website does not have any special events listed that would be impacted by these works.

3.2.8. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works

Works that have been identified as requiring a Traffic Control Plan are detailed below. Appendix 3 provides details on timing for implementation, the works being undertaken and the expected traffic impacts.

1. Pedestrian management during access/ egress

2. Footpath/ lane closures

3. Construction of driveways on Sydney Steel Road and Murray Street

3.2.9. Inner West Council required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring Council approval include:

1. Lane occupancy for works

2. Footpath occupancy for works

3. Construction of driveways on Sydney Steel Road and Murray Street



3.2.10. Roads and Maritime required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring specific RMS approval include:

1. Oversize and over mass vehicle movements (delivery of piling rigs)

4. Fleet Management

Trucks to be used on the project will be compliant with NSW legislation and standards including the Heavy Vehicle National Legislation. All heavy vehicle operations will be conducted in accordance with the Chain of Responsibility (CoR) Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-HS-PLN-002164).

A combination of truck types will be used during the Pretunnelling construction works. These trucks may be truck and dogs, semi-trailers, bin trucks and 5t tippers. Haulage Routes

Generally, the haulage routes will be via arterial roads/ freeway or Tollway. Where possible the routes have taken into account the requirements of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). It is noted that the EIS for this site access shows access via Sydney Streel Road and Murray Street The routes within this CTMP are in accordance with the EIS. Refer to Figure 3 below.

Material will be removed from site using a combination of vehicles. These trucks will range in size from 5.5m to 19.0m and material will be taken to authorised disposal sites around Sydney. Refer to Appendix 4 for details on the proposed routes.

Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes

4.1. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles

Permit issue for vehicles greater than 45.5 tonnes is through the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This applies to particular special purpose vehicles (SPV) such as mobile cranes and other oversize/over mass vehicles (OSOM). At present, RMS is currently undertaking this permit issue.



For over dimensional vehicles, generally vehicles that are greater than 25m length or 3.5m width require a pilot(s). Extremely long or wide vehicles will require an escort (fee payable). Permits will be applied for by the transport operator.

Oversize vehicles will be required at this site for the delivery and removal of piling rigs. These deliveries will occur outside of peak hours.

4.2. Drivers and Operators

Operator selection will be based on safety performance criteria. Operators and drivers will be required to have general construction industry induction cards and will be required to attend ongoing general project and site-specific inductions.

All operators will be comprehensively trained with regard to community expectations and impacts from haulage operations. The induction will have a particular focus on operator behaviour. Operator competency and standards of behaviour will be continually assessed, and discipline procedures will be put in place to maintain compliance.

Queuing of trucks in local streets around the sites will not occur as there will be sufficient designated area within site for trucks to wait. Trucks will arrive post the site start times.

5. Other Considerations

5.1. Road Safety Audits

Road safety audits will be undertaken during the development of the CTMP and upon implementation of the long-term work site. Refer to Appendix 5 for the audit report.

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast

A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.

5.3. Police and Emergency Services

The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.

5.4. Communications and the community

The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works.

Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website.

Table 2 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP



Table 2 Proposed Communications

NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE

Community notice YES

Precinct update/ e-update YES

Email YES

Internet YES

Community information centre NO

On site briefings YES

Print advertising YES – Quarterly newsletter only

5.4.1. Travelling public

Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following:

Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes

and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable messagesigns (VMS), where identified on the plans.

Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs

5.4.2. Stakeholders consulted

Table 3 identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP:

Table 3: Stakeholder consultation

STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE

TCG 31 Oct 2017 Meeting RMS/ CoS/ IWC/ TfNSW

Inner West Council 6 Nov 2017 Submission of CTMP Emilio Andari

RMS 6 Nov 2017 Submission of CTMP Ian McCarthy

TfNSW 6 Nov 2017 Submission of CTMP Berin Gordon

SCO 6 Nov 2017 Submission of CTMP Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

Centre for Road Safety 6 Nov 2017 Submission of CTMP Luke Wilby

Inner West Council 29 Nov 2017 Meeting and submission of CTMP

Emilio Andari/ Simon Lowe

Inner West Council 11 Dec 2017 Resubmission of CTMP Emilio Andari

RMS 11 Dec 2017 Resubmission of CTMP Chao Chen

TfNSW 11 Dec 2017 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon

SCO 11 Dec 2017 Resubmission of CTMP Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

5.5. Inspections and monitoring

The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours.

Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be



authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.

5.6. Environmental Maintenance

All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.

5.7. Site Contacts

Table 4: Site contacts

NAME POSITION CONTACT #

Scott Connor Project Manager

Kane Kipniat Superintendent

5.8. References

The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:

Construction Traffic Management Framework – Tender version Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard



Appendix 1 Parking restrictions

DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-01 Existing parking restrictions

SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002273-0003 Proposed parking restrictions

MURRAY STEDINBURGH RD

SYDNEY STEEL RD

SMIDMORE ST

EDINBURGH RD

RAILWAY PDE

EDINBURGH RD

NO PARKING

NO STOPPING

ALL UNMARKED PARKING IS

UNRESTRICTED

SCALE:

OF

CLIENTPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:9 April 2017 - 2:41 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\10-DELTAGROUP\151-MARRICKVILLE_EXISTINGPARKINGRESTRICTIONS\102-10-151-A-00.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

SYDNEY METROMARRACKVILLE

EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-01

1 1A-00N/A

LS

SL

SS

SYDNEY STEEL RD

M

U

R

R

A

Y

S

T

E

D

IN

B

U

R

G

H

R

D

NO PARKING

NO STOPPING

ALL UNMARKED PARKING IS

UNRESTRICTED

SCALE:

OF

SCALEPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:23 November 2017 - 10:03 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\002273-MARRICKVILLE\002273-DWG-0003-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET


SYDNEY METRO

SYDNEY METRO

MARRICKVILLEPARKING RESTRICTIONS 1 1

P1N/A

LS

SL

SS 0 5 20 25m1510

SCALE 1:500 AT ORIGINAL SIZE



Appendix 2 Proposed site operations


DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-02 Proposed access arrangements including swept path

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-04 Proposed egress arrangements including swept path

MURRAY ST

EDINBURGH RD

SYDNEY STEEL RD

RAILWAY PDE

EDINBURGH RD

FRAME 1FRAME 2

FRAME 3

FRAME 1

FRAME 2

FRAME 3

SCALE:

OF

SCALEPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:3 December 2017 - 11:17 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\0006-MARRICKVILLE\DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-02-P2.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET


SYDNEY METRO

SYDNEY METRO

MARRICKVILLESITE ACCESS 1 1

P2N/A

LS

SL

SS

N.T.S

MURRAY ST

EDINBURGH RD

SYDNEY STEEL RD

RAILWAY PDE

EDINBURGH RD

FRAME 1FRAME 2

FRAME 3

FRAME 1

FRAME 2

FRAME 3

SCALE:

OF

SCALEPROJECT

Plot Date: Cad File No:3 December 2017 - 11:26 PM C:\Users\samue\OneDrive\FDConsulting\102-SUELEWISCONSULTING\13-SYDNEYMETRO\0006-MARRICKVILLE\DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-04-P2.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET


SYDNEY METRO

SYDNEY METRO

MARRICKVILLESITE EGRESS 1 1

P2N/A

LS

SL

SS

N.T.S



Appendix 3 Traffic control plans

TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS

0006-05 Sydney Steel Road

Edinburgh Road

South of site

ALL Footpath and lane closure includes stop slow

Plant delivery/ removal

Driveway reconstruction

Hoarding installation

Minimal impacts to traffic as this is a No Through Road and the bulk of commercial premises have relocated. Access to the shared path at the southern end of Sydney Steel Road is maintained

0006-06 Edinburgh Road

Railway Parade

Murray Street

Night Footpath and lane closure


Minimal impacts to traffic as works undertaken at night after shopping centre hours

0006-07 Murray Street Edinburgh Road

Site All Footpath and lane closure

Plant delivery/ removal

Driveway reconstruction


Minimal impacts to traffic as this is a No Through Road and the bulk of commercial premises have relocated. There is little to no pedestrian traffic at this location

/

/

//

//

/

//

/


20100 40 50m30SYDNEY METRO

MARRICKVILLESYDNEY STEEL RD

LANE CLOSURE

1 1

P2N/A

LS

SL

SS

OVERBRIDGE

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

FO

OT

PA

TH

CL

OS

ED



MARRICKVILLEEDINBURGH RD LANE CLOSURE

1 1

P2N/A

LS

SL

SS

OVERBRIDGE

OVERBRIDG

E

OVERBRIDGE

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/FOOTPATH

CLOSED



MARRICKVILLEMURRAY ST

LANE CLOSURE

1 1

P2N/A

LS

SL

SS



Appendix 4 Haulage routes


SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002305-0001 Marrickville site to Princes Highway

SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002305-0002 Princes Highway to Marrickville site

SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002305-0003 Marrickville site to Princes Highway alternate route

SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002305-0004 Princes Highway to Marrickville site alternate route

Map data ©2017 Google 200 m

Go through 1 roundabout

170 m

250 m

40 m

28 m

250 m

550 m

SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-DWG-002305-0001 Sheet 1 of 1


Go through 1 roundabout

550 m

230 m

57 m

270 m

170 m




Stay on Edinburgh Road2

Turn right onto Edinburgh Road

3 Turn right onto Bedwin Road


400 m

230 m

57 m




Appendix 5 Road safety audit

RSA-06615

Page 1 of 3 Sydney Metro City and South West

Road Safety Audit ReportSHORT FORMAT

Title Sydney Metro City and South West RSA P/L Reference RSA-06615Sub-Title / Work Package Construction Traffic Management Plan -

Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction WorksReport Date 11 December 2017

Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) AuditorSecondary Auditor / Reviewer

Raj MuthusamyChris Keramidas

Client John Holland CPB Ghella TMP / Drawings Construction Traffic Management Plan:SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305 Rev C

Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L

Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the construction traffic management plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.

RSA-06615


Sydney Metro City and South WestT Audit Point Comment / Suggestion

John Holland CPB GhellaContact:

Responsex StatusyHeaders*****

1. Generally, no safety concerns are raised in relation to the proposed CTMP.

Note only. Accept Closed

2. DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-07 P2

Note indicates that traffic controllers are to maintain stop slow on the southern leg of Murray St. No trafficcontroller sign shown.

Review.

RSA-06615


Explanatory NotesShort Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness.It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections.The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it.Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history.Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team.XResponse: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion)YStatus: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’.Language:1. Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other

points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity. 2. ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar. 3. ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups. 4. ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative

action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders.5. ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and

high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring.6. ‘Minor’: Typically a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash.7. ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding.Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide below.References: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. RMS Traffic Control at Work Sites V. 4.0 (June 2010)Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’. Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews.Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience,views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.



Appendix 6 Review comments

Document: CTMP ‐ Marrickville Pretunneling Construction Works

Version: B

Date of review: 14/11/2017 Received 23/11/2017

Item No

Contract Contractor Doc RevItem Description, Page, Para, Drg

refStakeholder

Requirement Ref (COA or REMM)

TfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.1.2 Suggest removing 'the default speed limit' from

the 3rd sentenceDocument amended

2 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO

Appendix 3 refers to driveway reconstruction

works, however these appear to have not been

included in this section. Please update and amend

as appropriate.

Document amended

3 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCONote that the SCO would appreciate further

information regarding segment transportation as

we approach commencement

Document amended


2.2.2 The number of truck movements provided

appears to be based on a 5 day work week.

Expect this number would be higher if based upon

6 days

this number is based on 22 working days per month.

5 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.2.5 Suggest removing reference to 'Casa Del Desserts'

and providing a street numberDocument amended


Suggest approaching Council for further

information regarding the apartment construction

on Edinburgh Rd and engaging in conversation

with the proponent to determine cumulative

impacts and limit potential for conflict

This site is currently dormant and no activity has taken place for at least 12 months.


SCO are happy to facilitate discussions between

WestConnex and Sydney Metro in the event that

significant conflicts arise between the projects.

However in regards to ROLs, Sydney Metro should

liaise directly with WestConnex. A contact has

previously been supplied.

Document amended

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

2.2.1

2.2.8

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information


2.2.10 Are you able to provide a breakdown of the

number of shifts required for hoarding and

driveway construction works similar to what you

have done in other CTMPs?

This has not been provided previously in other CTMP. Typically driveway construction will take 1 week. Hoarding is an intermittent task and depends on ground conditions etc. no change to document proposed

9 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.2.12 and 3.2 Are you able to provide indicative dates for the

piling rig deliveries?No. that will be dependent on the approvals and work flow

10 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO 4.1 Suggest referring to Appendix 5 in the text. Document amended

11 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO4.3 Please provide a table of indicative

communications channels to be used as part of

this pre‐tunnelling phase

Document amended

12 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOSuggest including a pedestrian detour for the

footpath closureDrawing amended

13 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOHave turning paths been considered for the

western end of Sydney Steel Rd for any motorists

who may perform a U‐turn?

Drawing amended


Is it your intention to use a shuttle flow or a

stop/slow arrangement in this location?

A shuttle flow relates to the use of portable

signals which would make traffic controllers

unnecessary unless manual operation was

required. Suspect that you mean stop/slow.

Please update TCP and table on page 14 as

appropriate

Drawing amended









appropriate

Drawing amended

16 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOEnsure all distances have been provided for the

placement of signs etc.Drawing amended

17 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCOIncorrect measurement displayed for sign

placement on Murray StDrawing amended


DWG‐0006‐07

and pg 14








appropriate

Drawing amended

DWG‐0006‐05

and pg 14

DWG‐0006‐06

and pg 14

19 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO2.1.3 describe traffic generators and local access

requirements(business/residential/nil?) of Sydney

Steel Rd

Document amended

Document: CTMP - Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction WorksVersion: BDate of review: 16/11/2017

Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description,

Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 2.1.1 Check the speed limit on Edinburgh Rd should be 50kmh. Document amended

2 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 2.2

Please provide an indicative program to show each dot items in Section 2.2.1 This document is a CTMP for the approval

of access/ egress arrangements and for works that impact traffic. All works that occur within site are listed for information purposes only. The Traffic Forecast sent out weekly captures works at present within the next 4 weeks but it will be extended where possible. There are no works planned over the holiday period

3 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 3.2 OSOM permit will be included in this CTMP? Or presented in the later stage?

No. OSOM requirements will be fulfilled separately where required

4 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 4.1 RSA to be included Document amended

5 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CC 16-Nov-2017 Appendix 3 - All TCPs

General note: All TCPs shall be approved and signed by the designer, lists the design'ers certificate number, has provide an identifying number and dated on the TCP

Drawings amended


Provide details on pedestrian movement plan, as TCPs showing footpath closure at the southern end of Sydney Steel Road.

Drawings amended


Please check the signage. i.e. TCP 0006-05 proposed timing is "ALL" day? Should T1-200-2 be used? Drawings amended


End of Roadworks not show in some TCPs please add. Not required as noted in TCAWS Manual


Spacing between signs not shown, please add Drawings amended

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information

Document:Version: Date of review:

Item No

ContractItem Description, Page, Para, Drg

refTfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 TSE Section 2.1.1 Is 60km/hr on Edinburgh Rd correct? Likely to be 50 Document amended

2 TSE Section 2.1.1The appears to be a bus stop on Edinburgh Rd between Sydney Steel Rd and Murray St, westbound. For buses 308 and 352. How is it affected by short and long term works?

There is no impact

3 TSE Section 2.2

"Duration 11 months". Is it possible to get a likely calendar of works (or similar)? What works occur through the December 2017/January 2018 holiday period, if any? There is no duration provided for the short term works, Appendix 3 just states 'night' or 'all'.

This document is a CTMP for the approval of access/ egress arrangements and for works that impact traffic. All works that occur within site are listed for information purposes only. The Traffic Forecast sent out weekly captures works at present within the next 4 weeks but it will be extended where possible. There are no works planned over the holiday period

4 TSE Section 2.2.1

The works listed in dot points are short and long term. Short term works, e.g. tree removal are not shown in Appendix 3. Is it possible to see a table or such that shows what works occur when?

tree removal works are within site and have no traffic impacts. The works listed in dot points are to show the works occurring at the site. Appendix 3 details the works that have a traffic impact. Refer to response to Item 3

5 TSE Section 2.2.1

This section mentions segment deliveries. How many segment truck movements will there be? What are the likely routes (as they are only going to one place)? Will it be 24/7 delivery? How many rings on a semi-trailer?

Document amended

6 TSE Section 2.2.2

The numbers mentioned in this section do not correlate with Table 1. There is also a statement regarding truck movements will be minimal during peak periods. How many is minimal? Of the 50 per day how many would be in peak periods?

They do - Table 1 shows peak hour movements as well

7 TSE Section 2.2.4 See Comment 2 Refer to response to Item 2

8 TSE Section 2.2.5What management measure will be in place at the entry/exit points for pedestrians?

None

9 TSE Section 2.2.6Please provide detail on the impact on Casa Del Desserts, and if any impact how it will be managed?

No impacts

10 TSE Section 2.2.8Was WestConnex given a copy of this CTMP? Did they provide any information on their upcoming works?

We liaise with WestConnex and also through the SCO. The coordination of our works and WestConnex is through the ROL process

Sydney Metro City & Southwest Stakeholder Comment Tracker

RESPONSESTATUSO OpenC Closed

11 TSE Section 2.2.12

This section mentions oversize movements for delivery. Is it possible to add a likely period, within the overall period, when this will occur?

Will any short term traffic control be required to makes these movements?

oversize deliveries are intermittent. Where traffic control is required this will be included in the weekly traffic forecast sent to all parties

12 TSE Section 3 - Table 1

Table needs clarity: -Are those movements in and out or just in? -Saturday is not mentioned -Average per hour, is there a peak where the numbers in this table will increase? -Which access/es are these movements from?- 50 movements per day is mentioned in the text above Table 1, is a "day" the 12 hours shown? If so, the numbers in the table do not correlate to 50 movements

This table has been in all submitted CTMP submitted to date. The table notes that these are movements (not truck numbers). Saturday is not mentioned as this table is explaining the truck impacts on the AM and PM peaks in particular. The movements of vehicles will use the access/ egress required for their relevant work task. document has been amended to include note on Saturdays. Note that the Table and section do correlate

13 TSE Section 3.1

Over the weekend of November 11, 2017 May St was closed EB and one lane WB. What is the approach that will be taken, regarding haul movements during similar closures into the future, both weekend and night?

Alternate haul routes included

14 TSE Section 4.2 "…regular updates" How will this be achieved?through the traffic forecast and meetings/ discussions

15 TSE Section 4.3Information in this section is general. What notification/s will actually be done for establishing site and the associated short term works?

Document amended

16 TSE Section 4.3.1 What are VMS messages, timings and locations? Document amended

17 TSE Section 4.4How will JHCPBG JV capture changes to the short term works, on the night? How will it "... provide records of the traffic control implemented." ?

Checklists

18 TSE Section 4.5This section does not give any detail on how environmental maintenance will be undertaken.

Refer to CEMP and relevant Site Environmental Plans

19 TSE Section 4.6Will these engineers be on site? If not, who is the on-site contact? Are these contacts night or day contacts?

Document amended

20 TSE Appendix 2 - all drawingsWill any gate signs, stops signs, pedestrian management measures, hoarding line and type, truck turning signs, and any other relevant items be added to these drawings?

Gate signs and stop signs installed. No other signage is proposed

21 TSE

Notes on TCP generally reference AS1742.3 and TCAWs which is great, but there is no mention of specific sections. Also, how will the person installing the TCP be able to obtain this information when out on the road?

Drawings amended

22 TSE TCPs are not signed (5.1.2 of TC@Ws Manual). Drawings amended

23 TSETCPs should not be drawn on aerials photographs, see TC@AWS Appendix D. The aerial does lack clarity when trying to establish lanes closed

There is no requirement within TCAWS Manual for this

24 TSEWhat is the worksite protection method/device? Referencing AS1742.3 Section 4.2 and TC@Ws Section 3.6

Reduced speed limits, bollards, traffic controllers as noted on the drawings

25 TSEAll TCPs reference TCP 104, which is for Benkelman Beam Testing. Is this what work is occurring?

Yes they do. As noted in TCAWS Manual Appendix A - "this Appendix contains more than 100 standard TCPs and it will hep you select the most appropriate standard TCP for your circumstances. Some TCPs are specifically intended for particular work situations such as line marking...however the following tables do not name every work activity and judgement will be necessary in selecting the most appropriate TCP." Table A2 provides the most relevant TCP depending on traffic and road make up. of all those listed TCP 104 is the most suitable from a traffic perspective

26 TSETraffic Controller position very close to Edinburgh Rd. This may result in queuing of cars to Edinburgh Rd

Traffic controller positions are indicative only

27 TSEThe STOP/SLOW signage on Edinburgh Rd may create confusion for those not entering Sydney Steel Rd, consider END ROADWORK signs?

Drawings amended

28 TSE Why is sign spacing 40m when speed of road is 50km/hr? Drawings amended29 TSE Will hard protection be provided for traffic controllers? Traffic controller positions are indicative only

30 TSEThe signs shown suggest this is night work. If so, what lighting is in place for traffic controllers?

This is typically not shown on drawings. The use of lighting towers will depend on the site's ambient lighting conditions.

31 TSECheck signs spacings in relation to speed of the road and drafting (one spacing is 40.00000)

Drawings amended

32 TSE Will hard protection be provided for traffic controllers? Traffic controller positions are indicative only

33 TSEConsider relocating T1-5 sign from the median to left shoulder at the intersection of Edinburgh Rd and Bedwin Rd, as these signs should be for the left turn

the sign placement gives greater visibility

34 TSEThe signs shown suggest this is night work. If so, what lighting is in place for traffic controllers?

Refer to response to Item 30

35 TSE Will hard protection be provided for traffic controllers? Refer to response to Item 29

36 TSETraffic Controller position close to Edinburgh Rd. This may result in queuing of cars to Edinburgh Rd

This is a dead end street with only 1 business in operation. No change to drawing proposed

38 TSE Appendix 4Consider making the Map headings the same as the Description in the table (instead of the drawing number)

no change to drawing

39 TSE Appendix 5 Road Safety Audit to be included Document amended40 TSE Appendix 6 Review comments to be included Document amended

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-06

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-07

All TCPs

DD-SYDM-DWG-0006-05

Suite 2.06, Level 2 29-31 Solent Circuit Baulkham Hills NSW 2153 Tel: 61 (02) 9659 5433 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hbi.com.au

Leaders in Environmental Consulting

1

HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd A.C.N. 003 270 693 A.B.N. 39 003 270 693

Mr Stuart Hodgson 6 January 2018 Director Program Sustainability Environment & Planning Sydney Metro Transport for NSW PO Box K659 HAYMARKET NSW 1240 Ref: TSE CTMP MA Pre Tunnelling

Dear Stuart

RE: Endorsement of Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Reference is made to the following documents required by the Condition of Approval E82 of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project (SSI – 15_7400 January 9 2017) and submitted to the Environmental Representative (ER) for review and endorsement:

Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works: Sydney Metro City & Southwest (Document SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐DSY‐TM-PLN‐002305 Revision C dated 11 December 2017).

Email from the Sydney Coordination office dated 22 December 2017 stating “In accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South West the Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & South West Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works - TSE Works Rev C document reference SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305 for pretunnelling construction works

The Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approval above is conditional on the following requirements:

Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) from the Transport Management Centre(TMC) for any required lane closures and/or speed reduction;

Addressing any safety issues identified in the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;

The Construction Traffic Management Plan is reviewed upon approval of the TMP framework documentation to ensure it aligns with the approval;

Addressing any issues raised by Council, STA, Taxi Council, residents/businesses, Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;

mailto:[email protected]

Leaders in Environmental Consulting

2

HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd

Complying with haulage routes as approved by SCO/RMS and described in Appendix 4 of the CTMP;

Addressing any issues raised through Council’s traffic committee;

The Construction Traffic Management Plan being updated as required prior to construction commencing to ensure consistency with the final Construction Traffic Management Framework when it is approved

Pedestrian/cyclist safety is to be maintained at all times;

Access to commercial and residential properties is to be maintained safely at all times;

Any parking changes required are to be discussed and approved by Inner West Council via the appropriate channels; and

Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the works

As an approved ER for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project, I have reviewed the above documents. The review did not comprise a technical review, as the ERs are not traffic experts and have relied on the SCO and RMS Approval for technical aspects of the Plan. It is noted the document provides review comments and responses in Appendix 6. It is considered that the plan is consistent with Condition E82 of the Project Approval subject to the above conditions being complied with and is endorsed in accordance with Condition A24(d) of the Infrastructure Approval. Yours sincerely

Michael Woolley Environmental Representative – Sydney Metro – City and South West

Documents

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SWL-TM-PLN-002305-C Marrickville ... · Construction Traffic Management Plan – Marrickville Pretunnelling Construction Works SMCSWTSE-JCG-DSY-TM-PLN-002305Construction