91
Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017 SMART COLUMBUS ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT Created for Paul G. Allen Family Foundation (Foundation) April June 2017 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Section 1: QUARTER IN REVIEW 4 1.1 Progress/Successes 6 1.2 Select External Events / Speaking Engagements 17 1.3 Key Meetings / Visits 19 1.4 Contracts and Partner Agreement Status 20 Completed: 20 In Progress: 20 1.5 Important Updates / Milestones / Deliverables 20 1.6 Budget 26 1.7 Media Relations 27 1.8 Public Policy 28 Section 2: INDICATOR STATUS TABLES 30 2.1 Priority 1, De-carbonization and Grid Modernization 30 2.2 Priority 2 Fleet Adoption 32 2.3 Priority 4 Consumer Adoption 33 2.4 Priority 5 Charging Infrastructure 38 Section 3: RISK REGISTER 39 Section 4: PERFORMANCE METRICS PLAN 42 Section 5: GREEN POWER MARKETING PLAN 85

SMART COLUMBUS ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

SMART COLUMBUS ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM QUARTERLY

ACTIVITY REPORT

Created for Paul G. Allen Family Foundation (Foundation) April – June 2017

Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

Section 1: QUARTER IN REVIEW 4

1.1 Progress/Successes 6

1.2 Select External Events / Speaking Engagements 17

1.3 Key Meetings / Visits 19

1.4 Contracts and Partner Agreement Status 20

Completed: 20

In Progress: 20

1.5 Important Updates / Milestones / Deliverables 20

1.6 Budget 26

1.7 Media Relations 27

1.8 Public Policy 28

Section 2: INDICATOR STATUS TABLES 30

2.1 Priority 1, De-carbonization and Grid Modernization 30

2.2 Priority 2 – Fleet Adoption 32

2.3 Priority 4 – Consumer Adoption 33

2.4 Priority 5 – Charging Infrastructure 38

Section 3: RISK REGISTER 39

Section 4: PERFORMANCE METRICS PLAN 42

Section 5: GREEN POWER MARKETING PLAN 85

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Through the months of April, May and June, the Smart Columbus Program continues to

actively move toward the city’s electrification goals. We achieved several significant and

legally required milestones that will position our team to move into execution of the

electrification plan. On May 22, Columbus City Council approved legislation to enter into

agreement with the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation to initiate the first year of the program.

On June 5, Columbus City Council authorized legislation for the GPD Group proposal and a

sub recipient agreement with The Columbus Partnership.

Setting up for Sustained Success

The Smart Columbus Team has taken proactive steps and measures to ensure the success

of the program and ensure that are organized for sustained success.

The first step toward this objective was to bring the Smart Columbus Team together

under one roof to foster a cooperative environment to discuss and share ideas. The

team has relocated to the Columbus Idea Foundry, where The Columbus

Partnership, AEP and OSU have been working alongside the Program Management

Office, continues to be an innovative and collaborative workspace.

The Smart Columbus team welcomed Mandy Bishop as the Program Manager on July

10, 2017. Mandy has significant program management experience and is a results

driven professional who knows how to meet program goals while building consensus

with stakeholders. Mandy is a leader with a record of successfully delivering complex

projects, and has been involved with Smart Columbus in her current role as a Senior

Project Manager with the GPD Group. She also has experience working with USDOT

during her time as Deputy Director with the Ohio Department of Transportation.

Select representatives of the Smart Columbus Team, including members of the City

of Columbus, The Columbus Partnership and AEP attended the EV Roadmap 10

conference in Portland, Oregon. The team members learned a great deal in the

formal sessions and make strong connections for future information and best

practices sharing.

After winning the Smart City challenge and the Paul G. Allen (Vulcan) Foundation grant,

Smart Columbus undertook a rebranding effort paid for by The Columbus Partnership’s

Acceleration Fund to create a distinctive identity and improve the messaging for this

critical initiative. The new brand has been met with excitement by the community.

In an effort to raise public awareness for Smart Columbus and better communicate to

others the details of the program, we have developed and launched “Smart Columbus

Live”, a weekly series of two-hour educational experiences that are held at the

Columbus Idea Foundry.

With the new brand and improved messaging, collateral pieces have been

developed including an Electric Vehicle purchase guide that has been sent to all

members of the Columbus Partnership to continue to push the executive vehicle

purchase program. Five CEO’s have purchased electric vehicles, including

Columbus Partnership’s Chairman, Les Wexner the Chairman of L Brands, Inc.

In order to advance the electrification goals of the Smart City Grant, the Smart

Columbus Team hosted an Electric Vehicle Charging Station Expo. This event was

held to connect electric vehicle charging companies and industry leaders with

organizations, companies and governments who are interested in learning more

about electric vehicle infrastructure and relevant policies and procedures.

Smart Columbus Partner Agreements

Smart Columbus entered into agreement with Honda and INRIX in June 2017:

The Honda agreement includes a commitment from Honda to bring the Clarity PHEV model to the central Ohio market. In addition, Honda commits to providing used FitEVs for fleet and consumer leasing, participation in all program advisory working groups.

The INRIX agreement includes a commitment from INRIX to provide traffic data and the ParkMe smartphone app. The ParkMe app will provide to the user information on parking availability in downtown Columbus, including locations and availability of EV charging.

The following table details the status of agreements that remain to be executed that

Columbus is endeavoring to leverage the Smart City Challenge Grants to form

additional partnerships to financially support the programmatic goals of reducing and

replacing carbon-based fuel usage with clean energy sources.

Exhibit ES-1: Partner Agreements

Partner

Original

Value

Status

Additional

Commitment

Focus

Daimler -- Negotiating TBD EV models in market, EV

charging

Ford -- Negotiating TBD EV models in market, EV

charging, EV showroom

Honda -- Signed TBD EV models in market, EV

charging, research

Electrify

America

-- Negotiating TBD EV charging, consumer

education

IGS

Energy

-- Negotiating $1M Residential EV charging

INRIX Signed

Total $39.9M $153.6M

Grand

Total

$193.5M

Priority Area Achievements

The overarching goal of the electrification plan is to measurably decrease light duty

transportation greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through five priority areas:

decarbonization, electric fleet adoption, multi-model transportation systems, consumer

electric vehicle adoption and charging infrastructure. A high-level summary of the

achievements for each priority is included below.

Priority 1: Decarbonization and Grid Modernization:

Columbus Division of Power Green Power Marketing Plan:

The Division of Power has created a marketing activity timeline for their green energy portfolio,

which is the basis for the marketing plan. More information is included in Appendix E.

Bob Evans Solar Project:

Several activities took place during the past quarter relevant to the De-carbonization/Grid

priority. Among these activities include a site visit to the newly constructed Bob Evans

headquarters in central Ohio. Bob Evans Farms new complex achieved LEED Gold certification

for their campus which includes several green initiatives such as rooftop generated solar power.

DC Solar Deployment:

The Smart Columbus team and members of DC Solar met with individuals from The Ohio State

University, Ohio Dominican University, The Columbus Zoo, and Columbus State Community

College to explore the possibility of each of these groups using mobile solar units manufactured

by DC Solar.

Priority 2: Fleet Electric Vehicle Adoption:

Fleet EV Bid Status:

EV acquisition plans for the City of Columbus, The Ohio State University (OSU), Franklin

County, City of Dublin and AEP have been advanced. The City of Columbus solicited a bid

in May and received six quotes, which are currently being reviewed. Purchasing and Fleet are

currently meeting with one bidder to better understand lease vs. purchase and contract

language.

The City of Dublin recently programmed the purchase of 10 EVs into their 2018 through 2022

plan, with purchases planned in 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Fleet EV Progress indicator update:

By contacting 15 local public fleets, Clean Fuels Ohio helped the Smart City program office

surpass one of its progress indicators this quarter. CFO focused on updating fleet managers

about the options and opportunities that fleets have for reducing operational costs, improving

efficiency, and minimizing environmental impacts by implementing electric vehicle technologies.

Though the presentation was framed in overall fuel neutral capacity, particular focus was given

to the cost effective and easily implementable electric vehicle options.

1. Ohio State University Transportation

and Traffic Management, and

CampusParc LP

2. Delaware Public Transit

3. Delaware City Schools

4. City of Marysville

5. Union County Public Transit

6. Marysville City Schools

7. Franklin County

8. Grove City

9. Southwestern City Schools

10. Jefferson Township

11. City of Hilliard

12. Hilliard City Schools

13. Norwich Township

14. Columbus Public Schools

15. Big Walnut School District

Non-binding letters of intent signed between AEP and Clean Fuels Ohio and Workhorse to procure up to 500 EV Trucks over a two year period. An XL Hybrid Ride and Drive event was held on June 19th

Electric School Bus:

In an initiative to encourage local school districts to consider adopting electric buses, the Smart

Columbus team and the Columbus Public Schools worked with Charge-up Midwest to host a

press event and showcase an electric school bus built by the Lion Corporation. Representatives

from the City of Columbus Smart Columbus Program Office, Columbus Public Schools and the

City of Columbus Health Department spoke about the benefits of electric vehicles and the

importance of emissions reduction for not only environmental reasons but also increasing health

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

concerns related to poor air quality.

Fleet Training:

The Fleet subgroup has been working on preparations for Strategy 2.1.1, Training and

Technical Assistance Workshops; which will consist of an EV Intro Class, Safety,

Maintenance and Repairs.

Priority 3: Transit, Autonomous and Multi-Modal Systems:

This priority is a part of the Smart Columbus program driven by the USDOT grant. The city

also remains committed to other modes of travel such as bicycles. Bicycle infrastructure

remains a top priority of the city. Current design has arranged for approximately 30 street

segments expected to be under construction in 2017 that will involve bikeways work.

Projects expected to be completed in 2017 will add:

3.6 miles of bike lanes

3.5 miles of shared-use path

0.8 miles of sharrows

So far this year, the City has installed:

1.2 miles of bike lanes 1.2 miles of shared-use path 0 miles of sharrows

Priority 4: Consumer Adoption:

The Program Management Office (PMO) and Columbus Partnership are in detailed

discussions with automakers Daimler and Ford about their desired commitments to the

program on several initiatives, including:

Providing more EV models and number of EVs (used and new) to the seven-

county central Ohio region over the next three years

Providing more robust dealer training and engagement on EV sales

Increasing advertising and assisting with customer education efforts of EVs

to help educate consumers and reduce range anxiety

Coordinating with the program’s EV showcase, an initiative that will be

established to educate and inform local residents, visitors, stakeholders, and

other cities and leadership delegations from around the world about how

Columbus is becoming a Smart City

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Coordinating with the ride and drive initiatives

Coordinating and collaborating on EV charging initiatives and incentives

The source of data supporting the Smart Columbus tracking of consumer EV adoption is

National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) and HIS Polk. Data reporting compares EV and PHEV

new vehicle registrations compared to all vehicle fuel type new vehicle registrations during the

same period. The geographical area covered by the reported data is comprised of the seven

Central Ohio counties of Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking, Madison, Pickaway, and Union.

As the program progresses, the Program Management Office will continue to seek

out additional automakers as partners.

Priority 5: Charging Infrastructure: Charging infrastructure has been a focus for the Smart

Columbus team as the success of consumer adoption and deployment of electric vehicles,

both private and public, relies on such infrastructure. The progress this quarter includes:

EV Expo where an estimated 150 people attended to learn more about EV Charging

stations. 13 vendors shared their product in the garage adjacent to the site.

Establishment the framework to deploy a multi-unit dwelling (MUD) rebate program for

the 7-county central Ohio region. The City Program Office has tasked Clean Fuels Ohio

to act as the agent to distribute funds to developers for installing charging stations. Six

developers have signed the pledge forms to date.

The City of Columbus Facilities Management Office installed five Level 2 chargers in the

new city parking garage

MS Consultants signed on to provide recommendations to install DC Fast charging for

downtown streets with direct access to and from the interstate highways

Meeting with Association of Regional Councils (OARC), Mid-Ohio Regional Planning

Commission, and Ohio Environmental Protection agency to discuss took place on 6/28.

Topics covered were the public charging siting study prepared by NREL as related to the

VW settlement funding available to the entire state. The OARC is comprised of statewide

MPO Directors.

Met with Franklin County in their courthouse parking garage to discuss their plans to add

more EV charging stations to the facility.

Met with the Finance and Management Director and Project Manager of the City of

Columbus parking garage currently under construction to discuss the installation of EV

charging stations.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Conclusion

The City of Columbus is committed to being a strong partner of the Paul G. Allen Family

Foundation. This quarterly report serves as a crucial communication tool to share

successes and challenges along with progress made through use of data and narratives.

Below are several highlights from the program during April through June, 2017:

Section 1: QUARTER IN REVIEW PRIORITY HIGHLIGHTS

Priorities Highlights

Priority 1 - De-

carbonization/Grid Modernization

● Conversation with Bob Evans about their recent rooftop solar installations

● DC Solar selected Ohio Dominican University as first solar charging station deployment of 30 mobile units.

● DC Solar deployment opportunity discussions/site visits set up with the Columbus Zoo, OSU, and Columbus State

● Work is being done to source funds and accelerate repairs for the O’Shaughnessy hydroelectric power generator. This will help us achieve the goals of generating 10,000 MWh per year as early as 2019

Priority 2 - Fleet Adoption

● Proterra Electric Bus Demoed their electric bus for the Smart Columbus Team

● Finalized Comments on Electrification Coalition EV Suitability Analysis

● Contract has been signed for Fleet charging station design

● Bid specs finalized. 6 Bids have been received ● CFO and MEMA are hosting Midwest Green Fleets

Forum & Expo August 2nd -4th with EV showcase including training and information on buying EVs and charging infrastructure

● EV Hybrid Info Class with Safety Services and Maintenance training scheduled for September 25th. NAPA

● Progress Indicator #1 completed: Contact has been made with over 5 other governments and institutions (15 total)

Priority 4 - Consumer ● The Columbus Partnership (TCP) board met at the Idea

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Adoption Foundry on May 16: good turn out from young CEO’s and overall follow up interest

● Over 80 applicants for TCP new positions – Interviews conducted, but search still ongoing.

● Legislation for Columbus Partnership as a sub recipient to lead consumer adoption, private fleet, and workplace charging passed Council

● New Smart Columbus Branding finalized and rolled out to the community

● OSU EEDS Team Completed an EV Market Analysis ● Continued OEM Engagement with Daimler, GM, Ford

and Honda ● Executed Honda agreement ● Very positive and engaging relationship development

with Tesla – Tesla team visited Columbus and Smart Columbus traveled to San Francisco to meet with their leadership.

● NREL reported that EV and PHEV adoption in the seven-county region increased to 0.66% for 2016.

● Making progress with NREL on obtaining monthly EV and PHEV sales metrics

● AEP released the Nissan Leaf rebate that was extended to all AEP staff as well as all 1.6 million AEP customers

● Gallery walks have been rebranded as Smart Columbus Live – Walkthroughs to be held every Tuesday, July through December, for the general public.

● Look book of available electric vehicles developed and distributed to corporate CEOs.

● Five CEOs now driving electric vehicles.

Priority 5 - Charging

Infrastructure

● Positive feedback from EV expo survey ● Working to put together another vendor engagement day ● Public siting subgroup working to refine charging location

study ● Public siting subgroup meeting with ODOT to consider

inclusion of DC Fast chargers at downtown location ● Discussing site plan requirements with Building and

Zoning and AEP ● The City of Columbus and MS Consultants are finalizing

power source locations and necessary infrastructure to be installed for electric vehicle quick charging stations on Mound Street and Fulton Street

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

1.1 Progress/Successes

EV Expo/Vendor Engagement

● The Smart Columbus Charging Work

Group held the Columbus Electric

Vehicle Charging Expo, where vendors

had the opportunity to display their

products and provide additional

information about offerings as they

pertained to the various Smart

Columbus charging initiatives

● Over 150 invitees from local public

agencies, vendors, consultants and

owners attended the event.

● 13 Vendors displayed their charging

infrastructure

Decarbonization Efforts

Bob Evans Headquarters

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

The Smart Columbus Team visited the newly constructed Bob Evans headquarters in central Ohio, where a considerable effort of rooftop generated solar power was installed.

Battelle

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Franklin Co

DC Solar As part of the Decarbonizing Initiative, DC Solar will be deploying a number of solar powered

charging units across various locations and institution in Columbus based on their respective

requirements. The Ohio Dominican University will be the first to join this venture and has

agreed to accept 30 units. Other institutions such as the Columbus Zoo and OSU are also

interested in participating in this initiative. These units vary from solar charging stations for

electric vehicles, solar powered lighting stations with optional security cameras and solar

powered charging stations to charge mobile devices on-the-go or at special events.

Fig. 1 – EV Charger/Generator Fig. 2 - Lighting Tower

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Smart Columbus Rebranding and Launch of Smart Columbus Live

The Columbus Partnership held a board meeting for its members and unveiled the new Smart Columbus Live display. This meeting included advice and support for CEO’s and executives who are interested in buying electric vehicles and rolled out the corporate engagement roadmap. The rebranding initiative also includes a new Manifesto Video which can be viewed at the following link: New Manifesto Video

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Electric Vehicle Events and Showcases

Charge up Midwest Electric Bus Tour

Charge up Midwest is a campaign comprised of

environmental and clean energy organizations

committed to helping the Midwest reduce carbon

emissions from the transportation sector. Using

Volkswagen settlement funds, Charge-Up Midwest is

touring major Midwest cities to promote their electric

school bus initiative, of which Columbus is was last

stop. The Smart Columbus team and the Fort Hayes

Metropolitan Education Center hosted a press event

where Charge up Midwest showcased the electric

school bus.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

EV Roadmap Conference

Members of the Smart Columbus Team travelled to

Portland, Or, for the 10th EV Roadmap Conference. The

EV Roadmap conference is a leading electric vehicle

conference in the United States which brings together

over 550 industry stakeholders to explore emerging

industry trends and connect with other industry leaders.

This event gave the Smart Columbus Team the

opportunity to build new

relationships and networks

as well as exploring how

other cities are taking

steps to turn their cities

into a smarter City.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Ride and Drive Events

AEP Ride and Drive – June 2nd

● AEP hosted a BMW Ride and Drive in front of their building in Gahanna on June 2. Six

cars were available for test drives

● All Ohio-based AEP employees were eligible for Drive Electric discounts, in addition to

federal and AEP corporate discounts

● About 40 employees pre-registered, however walks in were able to participate

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

GPD Ride and Drive Event – June 8th

● GPD, the City’s Electrification consultant, hosted a successful BMW Charge

the Workday Ride and Drive event at their Columbus headquarters to

promote EV awareness; and,

● Over 33 test drives were conducted.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

XL Hybrid Ride and Drive – June 19th

Fleet adoption team held a private Ride & Drive event at AEP Ohio featuring XL Hybrids

Plug-in Ford F150.

The event was attended by employees of AEP and

the Cities of Columbus, Dublin, Gahanna, and New

Albany.

Public Charging Stations in City Parking Garage The City of Columbus has advanced construction of a parking garage that will serve the Department of Public Service and Building and Zoning Services. As part of the construction, 5 Level 2 chargers were included on the 1

st floor. The 141 N. Front Street garage is also a

targeted location for 50 additional plugs.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

City Projects and Charging Stations

I-71/I-70 Interchange

The City of Columbus is working with ODOT planning for electric vehicle fast charging stations along Mound Street (between High and Fourth) and Fulton Street (between Fourth and Grant). These stations could be considered for placement adjacent to a couple of the new on-street parallel parking stalls on these streets as part of ODOT’s project that is about to start construction. The goal is to make sure that any infrastructure required for these stations be constructed as part of the ODOT project so that this new work would not need to be disturbed when the charging stations are installed later.

Columbus EVI – Pro Hot Spot Map

In order to support Smart Columbus' public charging station initiative, National Renewable

Energy Lab (NREL) has prepared a draft report to identify optimal locations for charging

station placement. Following is an example of a map created by NREL:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

NREL acquired individual GPS travel trajectories from INRIX (a commercial traffic &

mapping provider). INRIX products are based on anonymized GPS data collected from

hundreds of millions of devices. For this effort, INRIX provided NREL with all GPS travel

trajectories (mode imputed as driving trips by INRIX) that intersected the Columbus region

at any time during 2016. Each trajectory features trip-level data such as start and end times

and GPS coordinates (including origins, destinations, and intermediate waypoints). The

"heat map" depicted above is an illustration of the data provided by INRIX.

1.2 Select External Events / Speaking Engagements

Event Date Location Role/Involvement

Central Ohio Insurance Day

April 6, 2017 Columbus Aparna Dial (speaker) – Smart Columbus

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Columbus Metropolitan Library

April 10, 2017 Columbus Presentation detailing Columbus Program

Civil Rights Symposium for Transportation (ODOT)

April 11, 2017 Columbus Patrice Brady, Katie Ott Zehnder – Opportunities with Smart Cities

Ohio Kentucky Region Council of Governments

April 13, 2017 Cincinnati Mike Stevens ( speaker) – Provided an overview of the Smart Columbus program

Advanced Energy Vehicle Showcase and Competition

April 17, 2017 Columbus Aparna Dial (speaker) – Smart Columbus – Mobility for the Future

Environmental Professionals Network Breakfast

April 18, 2017 Columbus Presentation detailing Smart Columbus project

Annual OSU Real Estate Conference

April 19, 2017 Columbus

Panel Discussion: Alex Fisher, Mike Stevens, Joanna Pinkerton – Smart Columbus Ryan Houk (speaker) – Grid of the Future

EV Expo/Vendor Engagement

April 24, 2017 Columbus ● Hosted Ev equipment manufacturers

● 13 Vendors, 150 attendees

Association for Commuter Transportation

April 27, 2017 Webinar ● Presentation detailing Smart

Columbus Program

Smart Cities Summit in NYC

May 3-6, 2017 New York City

http://smartcitiesnyc.com

Miami Valley Cycling Summit

May 5, 2017 Dayton

Columbus Chamber Government Day

May 12, 2017 Columbus Brandi Braun spoke at this event

StartUp Week Columbus

May 12, 2017 Columbus Loreana Marciante spoke at this

event

The Columbus Partnership Roll Out

May 16, 2017 Columbus

Dayton Regional Green Initiative Luncheon

May 24, 2017 Dayton

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

May 8, 2017 Columbus Announcement of Smart City

Hackathon Winners

RoundTable May 11, 2017 Columbus Bloomberg Live Roundtable on

Smart Cities

Athletic Club of Columbus

May 18, 2017 Columbus

Brandi Braun and Ryan Houk

participated in a Smart Columbus

Panel at the Athletic Club of

Columbus

AEP Ride and Drive Event

June 2, 2017 Columbus

The Nature Conservatory Grid Modernization Discussion

June 13, 2017 Columbus Columbus Division of Power and

AEP

Clean Fuels Ohio hosted Drive Electric Ohio Auto Show

June 24, 2017 Columbus

This event will be in partnership with

the Heit Center, the Chamber, and

the New Albany Bike Rodeo

1.3 Key Meetings / Visits

Company/Agency Date

Honda April 4, 2017 Bosch and Pillar Technologies April 7, 2017

Deloitte April 10, 2017 DC Solar Site Visits April 10, 2017

IBM Innova AV/EV Discussion April 14, 2017 Pittsburgh Mayor’s Office April 17, 2017

EVSE Webinar April 17-18, 2017 Meeting With Vulcan PM April 18, 2017

BMW April 18, 2017 Siemens April 18,2017

Proterra Electric Bus April 19, 2017 IKEA April 19, 2017

Yellow Cab Site Tour April 21, 2017 Verizon April 21, 2017

Navya EAV Manufacturer April 26, 2017

GM May 1, 2017 Envision May 4, 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Cleverciti May 5, 2017

Honda May 9 &18, 2017 Battelle May 9 & 24, 2017

Tesla May 10, 2017 Abu Dhabi May 19, 2017

Daimler (MBUSA) May 23, 2017 DC Solar June 6 & 7, 2017

Charge Up Midwest Electric School Bus Road Tour June 13 & 23, 2017

Netherlands Delegation June 26 & 29, 2017 Honda/Partnership/ODOT June 30, 2017

Other important events of note:

● EV Roadmap 10. Portland, Oregon

1.4 Contracts and Partner Agreement Status

Completed:

● Signed Foundation agreement received by PMO on April 26, 2017. Council Approved on

May 22, 2017.

● Signed GPD Proposal accepted by the city and approved in Council on June 5, 2017.

● Legislation for the Columbus Partnership as a sub recipient and to contract with GPD as

a consultant approved in Council June 5, 2017.

● GPD Contract officially executed on June 30, 2017

● Honda Cooperative Agreement executed on June 6th, 2017

● MORPC approved the SFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)

In Progress:

● Columbus Partnership met with Electrification Coalition to initiate scope conversations about their role in consumer adoption, workplace charging, and private fleet conversation.

● Contract drafts for Columbus Partnership and GPD have been prepared and are under review. Signature is expected soon.

● Ongoing Discussions with Daimler, Tesla and Electrify America.

1.5 Important Updates / Milestones / Deliverables

Decarbonization Milestones/Deliverables and Proposed Due Dates

● May 1, 2017 - Deployment Plan for solar generators from DC Solar - Completed

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

● May 1, 2017 - Completed Green Power Marketing Plan - Completed ● May 1, 2017 - PUCO approval of the AEP Energy Efficiency Filing- Completed ● May 1, 2017 - PUCO approval to AEP for GridSMART Phase 2 Filing - Completed

Consumer Adoption Milestones/Deliverables and Proposed Due Dates

Note: As a sub-recipient agreement will be in place, a recovery schedule will be provided

● May 1, 2017 - Salespeople confidence in ability to sell an EV

● May 1, 2017 - Assessment of current EV conditions in Columbus ● May 1, 2017 - List of possible options for legislation/incentive programs to be used in

Columbus and Ohio ● May 1, 2017 - Complete Group Purchasing Plan ● May 1, 2017 - Completed Workplace EV Adoption Plan ● May 1, 2017 - Updated Smart Columbus website ● May 1, 2017 - Initial Community Ride and Drive Event

Charging Infrastructure Milestones/Deliverables and Proposed Due Dates

● May 1, 2017 - USDOE Needs Assessment - Completed

● May 1, 2017 - Utilization tracking mechanism - TBD ● May 1, 2017 - Columbus Fleet needs assessment - Completed ● May 1, 2017 - City workplace charging plan – ON HOLD

Other Smart City Initiative progress is as follows:

OSU EEDS Capstone Projects

The Environment, Economy, Development and sustainability (EEDS) Capstone project is a hands-on real-world education component of the EEDS degree offered at the Ohio State University that involves addressing future sustainability challenges. Members of the Smart City team worked with students throughout their projects by collaborating and sharing ideas and information learned about smart cities. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWtxW5cfkWM Students also submitted final Posters that detail the results of their respective case studies. Link: ftp://dpsftp:[email protected]/SmartColumbus Awards and Achievements

Smart Columbus was the recipient of the William C. Habig Collaborative Achievement award.

The William C. Habig Collaborative Achievement award is annually presented to an individual or

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

individuals who have achieved an effective effort or innovative collaborative in Central Ohio.

Link: ftp://dpsftp:[email protected]/SmartColumbus

Video Link: https://vimeo.com/213925951

Charging Station Installations and Scope

● GIS Map showing NREL EVI-Pro hot spots, existing L2 charging infrastructure, taxi-way points/idling locations, and proposed DC Fast chargers in downtown projects developed

Look Ahead

Major items:

● CFO/MEMA and CSCC EV Showcase and Training Day, August 1, 2017

● Midwest Green Fleets Forum and Expo – Sponsored by CFO/MEMA, August 2, 2017

● EV Hybrid Info Class with Safety Services and Maintenance training, September 25,

2017

● The Fall OSU EEDS Program will be coming in August

● MS Consultants Downtown charging station recommendation

Electrification Plan Q2 Activities:

Decarbonization/Grid Q2 Activities:

● AEP will monitor the progress of the ESP Filing with the Commission (Utility Scale Renewables)

● AEP will identify Research Subjects and Partners to learn new and improved way to advance clean energy technologies

● AEP will continue program for customer driven distributed generation projects and report on new distributed generation projects

● Continue deployment of the 10 solar generators from DC Solar ● Develop marketing material for Green Power Plan for Columbus Division of Power ● Continue plans for using biogas from City wastewater treatment plants as fuel for

Combined Heat and Power ● Columbus Division of Power to continue design of rehabilitation of hydroelectric plants ● AEP to continue running the Community Energy Savers Program ● AEP to issue AMI installation vendor RFP for GridSMART Phase 2 ● Columbus Power develop specifications and prepare terms and conditions for Advanced

Metering Infrastructure ● Columbus Power to gather detailed proposals for Street Light Technology Conversion

from qualified teams ● All new street lights installed to be LED

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Fleet Q2 Activities:

● Complete contract with consultant to assist with fleet adoption ● Continue work with other regional governments/institutions to identify electric fleet

acquisition opportunities ● Complete contract with consultant to assist with fleet adoption ● Assist private entities with installing charging infrastructure ● Continue making contact with private fleet managers ● Assist private fleet managers with EV technical and safety training ● Assist private fleet managers with procurement specifications ● Complete contract with consultant to assist with fleet adoption ● Conduct existing market assessment and identify pertinent TSP contacts to conduct

informational meetings informing of potential options Consumer Adoption Q2 Activities (These activities are under consideration and will be updated once the recovery schedule is available).

● Conduct a literature review and/or landscape assessment as a baseline for the three strategies

● Determine and define appropriate inventory for the region to meet demand ● Determine goals for product availability ● Determine framework for consumer perception measurement throughout the program ● Identify key indicators, milestones and methods of measurement and tracking ● Develop an OEM/Dealership/Partner relationship map ● Assess the current availability of OEM models ● Conduct baseline consumer perception research ● Get dealership agreement for performance measurement of EV sales ● Publish report on baseline consumer perception in Columbus region ● Conduct audit on product availability in market ● Research best practices from other cities for used electric vehicles ● Cultivate pledges/partnerships with local dealership owners and OEM leadership ● Study best practices for dealer training; conduct landscape assessment ● Facilitate ongoing collaboration, commitment, and engagement among dealerships and

OEMs ● Negotiate group purchase rates for fleet and consumer purchases of new and used

vehicles ● Develop dealer recognition program to incentivize participation ● Cultivate pledges/partnerships with local dealership owners and OEM leadership ● Create a Communications/Outreach Plan and Communications Toolkit with Adoption

Team/OEM/Dealerships for new and used EVs ● Develop curriculum and training experience ● Determine how to assess and track success of Dealer Training Program

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

● Speak to company executive leadership teams ● Identify employer representatives responsible for their workplace adoption campaigns ● Cultivate workplace pledges ● Expose Partnership Members to EVs at May Board Meeting ● Conduct strategy and do fabrication for Ride and Drive Roadshow ● Schedule dates for Ride and Drives for Q2 ● Create EV education component to Smart Columbus website ● Be opportunistic about integrating EV promotion into large scale events throughout City ● Continue discussions on Smart Columbus showroom ● Continue speaking to company executive leadership teams ● Continue identifying employer representatives responsible for their workplace adoption

campaigns ● Continue cultivating workplace pledges ● Give extended test drives to Columbus Partnership members ● Execute Ride and Drive Roadshow ● Schedule dates for Ride and Drives for Q3 ● Be opportunistic about integrating EV promotion into large scale events throughout City ● Launch pilot showroom in the form of gallery walks ● Continue discussions on Smart Columbus showroom ● Develop and distribute communications Toolkit materials to employer representatives ● Determine details and location of a Smart Columbus Showroom ● Determine feasibility of a free car give away campaign

Charging Q2 Activities:

● Continue recruiting developers/management companies for future installation sites ● Determine long term plan for MUD charging ● Develop marketing and outreach strategy to help developers engage and educate

tenants ● Develop appropriate signage templates and recommendations ● Continue development of partnerships with site hosts and secure commitments ● Complete legislation for changes needed for inclusion of EV charging infrastructure ● Finalize model site plans and specifications ● Develop clear and specific implementation plan ● Assure City processes and permits allow for workplace inclusion of EV charging

infrastructure ● Begin discussions with potential site hosts and identify workplace employee

representatives ● Develop clear and specific implementation plan for private workplace charging ports ● Assist private entities with site plans, charging specifications and construction ● Begin installation of charging ports ● Continue discussions with potential site hosts and secure commitments ● Provide facility managers with any needed training and assistance

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

● Provide education materials and communications assistance to support efforts with employees

● Determine long term plan for workplace charging ● Continue developing plan for charging station installation for Columbus fleet ● Determine permits that will be required and process for homeowners ● Determine any zoning and parking code changes that may be needed ● Develop model site plan and specifications for installation of charging ports ● Develop City process for review and adoption of changes in building and zoning codes,

including legislative review

Weekly Reporting Record

Documents for the Foundation program were formally submitted on the following dates:

● April 6, 13 & 20

● May 4, 11, 18 & 25

● June 1, 8, 15, 22 & 29

Program Risk Related Activities

● The current Risk Register is located at section 3 of this document

Playbook Development Progress

The intent of the playbook is to identify processes and lessons learned to assist with knowledge

transfer across all priorities. A Playbook will be provided for the Quarter 2 report per the

agreement; however a draft is being provided this quarter for comment.

Click the link below to view the Look Book examples:

Smart City Electrification Playbook

Vulcan Playbook Resources:

https://www.columbus.gov/SmartColumbus/VulcanPlaybookResources

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

1.6 Budget

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

1.7 Media Relations

Smart Columbus Electric Vehicle Charging Expo

Link: http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2017/04/13/columbus-holding-electric-vehicle-

charging-expo-as.html

AEP to provide $10,000 discount for a Nissan Leaf for customers in AEP Ohio territory

Link: http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2017/05/24/customers-in-aep-ohio-territory-

can-get-10-000-off.html

City Council has approved spending $3.3 million to implement the Smart Columbus Electrification Plan Link: http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170522/council-funds-police-video-storage-and-smart-columbus-electrification Columbus CEO about Smart Columbus:

Link: Smart Columbus: Who’s Making it Happen and How?

Link: Smart Columbus: How Can Your Business Get Involved?

Link: Smart Columbus: What Does it Mean for Mobility?

Electric School Bus Tour with Charged Up Midwest

Link: http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170623/all-electric-bus-touted-as-healthier-for-kids-

better-for-environment

Ohio State senior projects support Smart Columbus mission

Link: https://news.osu.edu/news/2017/04/19/ohio-state-senior-projects-support-smart-columbus-

mission/

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

All Electric Hopper Carts Start Offering Free Rides

Link: http://radio.wosu.org/post/all-electric-hopper-carts-start-offering-free-rides-short-north

Honda plans cars with increasing levels of self-driving capabilities

Link: http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170608/honda-plans-cars-with-increasing-levels-of-self-

driving-capability

Smart Columbus: How Can your Business Get Involved?

Link: http://www.columbusceo.com/business/20170602/smart-columbus-how-can-your-

business-get-involved

Columbus’ Smart City initiative has entrepreneurs knocking on the door looking to make their

mark

Link: https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2017/06/09/columbus-smart-city-initiative-

has-entrepreneurs.html?ana=RSS%26s=article_search

Ohio to play key role in driverless cars

Link: http://www.springfieldnewssun.com/business/economy/ohio-play-key-role-driverless-cars-

transportation-research/ADzMvH2BdkoFeQjPJfyg4O/

1.8 Public Policy

The Columbus Partnership has worked closely with the Governor’s office, the administration

and legislature and provided updates on progress made.

The Partnership hosted an economic development briefing in March where 17 members

of the central Ohio legislative delegation came together to discuss economic

development in the region with Smart Columbus as a featured topic.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Governor Kasich mentioned Smart Columbus in his State of the State Address on April

4th.

Vital input on certain policies was provided to retain inclusion of Smart Columbus related

initiatives in the state’s transportation budget. Those considerations include:

An amendment to allocate $30 million of Volkswagen settlement dollars for public transit,

which would have hampered our ability to obtain funding in the first two years of the

project to deploy required charging infrastructure.

Discussions by local and county leaders to generate revenue by taxing CNG and electric

vehicles. Discussion involved a highway funding and study committee, which will be

handled by the Ways and Means committee in the Senate. The smart Columbus policy

team is working to provide input about the early stage market EVs are in and how they

can use the study committee to look at creating thresholds as the markets grow.

With advisement from the Smart Columbus policy team, Governor Kasich vetoed a bill

on March 31, 2017, that would have slowed down funding efforts for the project.

Creation and activation of a Smart Columbus Policy Committee

Four meetings have been held with policy committee members including City, County,

Partnership, OSU, Nationwide, AEP and Columbus chamber of Commerce

representatives. Joining upcoming Committee meetings will be the Mid-Ohio Regional

Planning Commission (MORPC) and Clean Fuels Ohio.

It is important to engage elected officials and policy makers in conversation about electric

vehicles and smart mobility in order to ensure the legislators make informed policy decisions

that support the Smart Columbus program. Federal support of Smart Columbus initiatives from

the Ohio Delegation has been encouraging.

Articles addressing Ohio policy updates

John Kasich Signs Transportation Budget:

http://governor.ohio.gov/MediaRoom/PressReleases

Sherrod Brown introduced legislation to help Ohio Employers Provide Next-Generation

Transportation Benefits for Employees Driving EVs:

https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/brown

The Partnership hosted a dozen senior staff members from the PUCO for a private briefing,

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Smart Columbus Live session where we discussed the future of electric mobility and the role of

charging infrastructure and grid modernization in supporting the rapid growth of this technology.

Section 2: INDICATOR STATUS TABLES

This section includes activities scheduled to take place during Quarter 1, April to June 2017,

but some activities have already been initiated by the Smart Columbus Program.

2.1 Priority 1, De-carbonization and Grid Modernization

Progress Report through July 2017

Successes: AEP received PUCO approval to extend gridSMART with a Phase 2 deployment

that will be comprised of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI); The City of Columbus

Division of Power and AEP negotiated an agreement for AEP’s technical support during the

O’Shaughnessy Dam hydroelectric project.

Progress: DC Solar deployment plan exceeded 10 units.

Challenges: PUCO Approval for Charging Stations

Lessons: Several agencies and companies such as Franklin County and Bob Evans Farms

are already engaged in decarbonization activities, and it is important to coordinate Smart

Columbus with other regional efforts.

Sept 16-June 17 Apr 17-June 17 Apr 17-June 17

INDICATORS Progress to

date Q1 Target Q1 Actual Notes

Decarbonization - Priority 1 (Baseline Data)

Indicator #1: MW of renewable energy capacity installed

- _

indicator #2: MWh of renewable electricity consumed

- _

DOP 50,760,

AEP research

ing Indicator #3: MWH of energy saved (new renewable energy or energy efficiency)

_ _

Utility-Scaled Renewables - Initiative 1.1

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Initiative #1: 905 MW by 2030 (Strategies 1.1.1 & 1.1.7)

_ _

Initiative #2: renewable energy MWh consumed (Strategy 1.1.5)

Progress Indicator #1: No. of New AEP Distributed Energy Customers (Strategy 1.1.3)

50

annually -

Reported

Annually (Q4)

Progress Indicator #2: Number of deployments of 10 mobile solar generators or EV charging ports (Solar Generator Deployment (DC Solar)) (Strategy 1.1.4)

_

_

Progress Indicator #3: Customers contacted through Green Power Marketing Plan (strategy 1.1.5)

_

_

Progress Indicator #4: Percent increase of MWh of Green Power sold (Strategy 1.1.5)

0

0 _ 42,000 MWh

Grid Modernization and Efficiency - Initiative 1.2

Initiative #1: MWh saved (Combined over Strategies 1.2.1, 1.2.5, & 1.2.7)

_ _

Progress Indicator #1: % increase energy efficiency as a result of CES Participation (Strategy 1.2.1)

0

This will be

reported on an annual basis.

_

160GWh

Progress Indicator #2a: AEPAMI meters installed (Strategy 1.2.3

0 - _ 132,0

00

Progress Indicator #2b: AEP Micro Grids installed (Strategy 1.2.4)

0 - _

Progress Indicator #3: AEP Smart Lighting Program Smart controller unit installed (Strategy 1.2.5)

0

-

_

Progress Indicator #4: Columbus Division of Power AMI meters installed (Strategy 1.2.6)

0 - _ In progress, project is in phase 2 of planning

Progress indicator #5: Columbus Division of Power LED street lights installed (Strategy 1.2.7)

0 - 135

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

2.2 Priority 2 – Fleet Adoption

Progress Report through June 2017

Successes: By contacting 15 local public fleets, Clean Fuels Ohio helped the Smart City

program office surpass one of its progress indicators this quarter. CFO focused on updating

fleet managers about the options and opportunities that fleets have for reducing operational

costs, improving efficiency, and minimizing environmental impacts by implementing electric

vehicle technologies. Non-binding letters of intent signed between AEP and Clean Fuels

Ohio and Workhorse to procure up to 500 EV Trucks over a two year period. An XL Hybrid

Ride and Drive event was held on June 19th

Progress: EV acquisition plans for the City of Columbus, The Ohio State University

(OSU), Franklin County, City of Dublin and AEP have been advanced. The City of

Columbus solicited a bid in May with quotes due June 8, and then extended to bid

opening June 11, 2017. 6 quotes were received and are being reviewed with an

anticipated recommendation for award to the Director of Finance in mid to late July.

Purchasing and Fleet are currently meeting with one bidder to better understand lease

vs. purchase and contract language. The City of Dublin recently programmed the

purchase of 10 EVs into their 2018 through 2022 plan, with purchases planned in 2018,

2019 and 2020. The Fleet subgroup has also been working on preparations for

Strategy 2.1.1, Training and Technical Assistance Workshops; this training will consist

of an EV Intro Class, Safety, Maintenance and Repairs. It’s more of overview training,

not specific to certain models or machines.

Challenges: Installation of charging station locations for city fleet vehicles

Lessons: As other agencies are working on their own initiatives, it is important to remain

engaged on new opportunities such as the Electric School Bus

Sept 16-June 17 Apr 17-June 17 Apr 17-June 17

INDICATORS Progress to

date Q1 Target Q1 Actual Notes

Fleet Adoption - Priority 2

Indicator #1: Fleet Electric Vehicles Purchased _ _

Public Fleets - Initiative 2.1

Initiative Indicator: 300 Evs purchased (Public Fleet Transition)

_

_

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Progress Indicator #1: Contacts made with other governments or institutions

5 15

Progress Indicator #2: Municipal governments or institutions pledged to electrification (fleet analysis and vehicle acquisition plan)

_

6

Progress Indicator #3: City of Columbus and public partner training sessions (Strategy 2.1.1)

_ _

Private Fleets - Initiative 2.2

Initiative Indicator: 450 Evs purchased _ _

Progress Indicator #1: Private sector training sessions (Strategy 2.2.2)

0 0

Progress Indicator #2: Establish and distribute EV survey/assessment document (Strategy 2.2.1)

50 0

Progress Indicator #3: New private company pledged to electrification (Strategy 2.2.1)

_ _

Progress Indicator #4: New private fleet vehicles pledged to electrification (Strategy 2.2.1)

30 0

Progress Indicator #5: Completed vehicle analysis acquisition plan

5 0

Transportation Service Providers - Initiative 2.3

Initiative Indicator: 30 Evs placed in operation (TSP Fleets)

_ _

Progress Indicator #1: Number of Contacts made with TSPs

_ _

Progress Indicator #2: TSPs pledged to electrification

_ _

2.3 Priority 4 – Consumer Adoption

Progress Report through March 2017

Successes: Honda committed to distribute the Clarity EV in Columbus by Q4 of 2017; in the

last week of March, seven AEP employees purchased Nissan Leafs due to a group

purchase discount that was extended through AEP; the CEO of L Brands and Chairman of

the Columbus Partnership kicked off the Executive Electric Vehicle commitment by

purchasing and regularly driving two Chevy Bolts.

Progress: An EV employee purchasing program has been organized and other companies

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

will be challenged to do the same; three automakers are being actively engaged for deep

commitments to the program, including Honda, Ford and Daimler.

Challenges: Fully executed agreements not yet in place

Lessons: Partnerships with OEMs, local dealers, and utility companies require time and

attention to nurture and secure; Companies and employers are eager to engage with Smart

Columbus; there are key areas where charging is needed throughout the community and

there might be a need for additional trained electricians to install residential charging

stations.

EV Adoption According to Vehicle Registration Records

Columbus region registration data is reflected in the tables below from the periods beginning in

2014 through April 2017.

2014 and 2015 registration data was obtained through summary information from IIHS Polk

aggregated at the National Renewable Energy Lab based on Polk Subscription data.

2016 vehicle registration data was also obtained through IIHS Polk, but the base data set were

more detailed, quarterly statistics were aggregated from monthly queries of fuel type and model

years.

2017 vehicle registration data (Jan through April) was obtained through specific Polk data

acquisition by Smart Columbus, aggregated into monthly totals for PHEV and BEV against all

registrations.

The data shared in the table below is the percent of new vehicle sales (meaning ‘new vehicles’

entering the overall fleet) based on registration data.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

The 2016 data set was detailed enough that the total number of EVs in the fleet (not just new

vehicle sales) could be assessed. Out of approximately 1.7 million registered vehicles in the

area, 2197 are VEV or PHEV – for a percentage of about 0.13%.

Sept 16-June 17 Apr 17-June 17 Apr 17-June 17

INDICATORS Progress to date Q1 Target Q1 Actual Notes

Consumer Adoption - Priority 4

Priority Indicator #1: EV Market penetration (Evs purchase divided by total vehicles purchased)

0.40%

0.40%

EV PHEV TOTAL(EV+PHEV) TOTAL SALES

2014

Q1 17 35 52 27310 0.19%

Q2 40 74 114 29830 0.38%

Q3 38 37 75 26600 0.28%

Q4 32 28 60 14070 0.43%

Yearly Total 127 174 301 97820 0.31%

2015

Q1 36 46 82 26750 0.31%

Q2 26 64 90 13490 0.67%

Q3 44 64 108 37180 0.29%

Q4 31 50 81 19910 0.41%

Yearly Total 137 224 361 97320 0.37%

2016

Q1 33 61 94 24730 0.38%

Q2 42 102 144 28330 0.51%

Q3 55 189 244 27630 0.88%

Q4 63 125 188 20880 0.90%

Yearly Total 193 477 670 101580 0.66%

2017

Jan 21 18 39 7280 0.54%

Feb 14 15 29 8790 0.33%

Mar 24 23 47 10030 0.47%

Q1 Total 59 56 115 26100 0.44%

Apr 19 13 32 8660 0.37%

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Priority Indicator #2: Estimated equivalent number of Evs purchased

92 92

Research and Assessment - Initiative 4.1

Progress Indicator #1: Perceived Desirability of EV Ownership, Consumer likelihood to buy a PEV or PHEV as their next car, Consumer perception of barriers to own an EV

ALS*

ALS*

Progress Indicator #2: Salespeople confidence in ability to sell an EV

ALS* ALS*

Progress Indicator #3: Consumer satisfaction with dealer Knowledge of Evs

ALS* ALS*

Progress Indicator #4: Salespeople confidence in ability to sell an EV compared to fossil fuel model

ALS*

ALS*

Progress Indicator #5: Salespeople interest in selling an EV

ALS* ALS*

Progress Indicator #6: Total number of EV models available in the Columbus Market

TBD TBD

Progress Indicator #7: Ratio of models sold at dealerships in Columbus vs. models sold in the U.S.

TBD

TBD

Progress Indicator #8: Ratio of dealerships selling PEVs and PHEVs vs. total operating dealerships in the Columbus area

TBD

TBD

Progress Indicator #9: Amount of used EV models sold in the Columbus Market

TBD TBD

Progress Indicator #10: Ratio of OEMs supplying PEVs and PHEVs in Columbus vs. OEMs supplying models in the U.S.

TBD

TBD

Address Supply - Initiative 4.2

Progress Indicator #1:Total Dealer and OEM Partner Pledges Received

_ _

Progress Indicator #2:Percentage of Columbus Dealerships Pledged

_ _

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Progress Indicator #3: Percentage of OEMs Pledged

_ _

Progress Indicator #4: Number of Car Salespeople Trained

TBD TBD

Progress Indicator #5: Number of Trainings Conducted

_ _

Progress Indicator #6: Number of Different Dealers with Certified Salespersons

1 2

Progress Indicator #7: Overall satisfaction rate of participating dealers

ALS* ALS*

Progress Indicator #8: Number of negotiated group purchase rates

_ _

Progress Indicator #9: Number of PEV and PHEV models eligible for group purchase rates

TBD TBD

Increase Demand for Evs - Initiative 4.3

Progress Indicator #1: Number of visits to EV education website

_ _

Progress Indicator #2: Number of Visits to Consumer Education Showroom

_ _

Progress Indicator #3: Significant Events at the Showroom

_ _

Progress Indicator #4: Number of Workplace Company Commitments/Pledges

3 4

Progress Indicator #5: Number of Ride and Drive Events Conducted

2 _ _ AEP

Partnership (Boston)

Progress Indicator #6: Number of test drives conducted at the Ride and Drive Events

130 + _ _

Progress Indicator #7: Attendance at Ride and Drive Events

200+ _ _

Progress Indicator #8: Number of Executive Vehicle Purchases

2 4 5

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

2.4 Priority 5 – Charging Infrastructure

Sept 16-June 17 Apr 17-June 17 Apr 17-June 17

INDICATORS

Progress to date

Q1 Target

Q1 Actual

Notes

Charging Infrastructure - Priority 5

Priority Indicator: Charging Station Ports 20 L1, 0

L2, 0 DC

21 L1, 0 L2, 0 DC

Residential Charging - initiative 5.1

Initiative #1: 30 L1 MUD Charging Ports _ _

Initiative #2: 1,000 L2 single home charging ports

_ _

Progress indicator #1: MUD developers contacted to install EV Charging Infrastructure

10 10 5

Progress Indicator #2: MUD developers signed pledge form to install EV Charging infrastructure

3

0

Pledge form was replaced with the rebate application

Public Access Charging - Initiative 5.2

Initiative #1: 30 public accessible charging station ports (CoC)

2 _ 5 City

Garage

Initiative #2: 25 DC fast charging stations (AEP)

_ _

Initiative #3: 250 Level 2 charging ports (AEP)

_ _

Progress Indicator #1: Meeting with potential site hosts

5 3

Progress Indicator #2: Site host commitments

_ _

Workplace Charging - Initiative 5.3

Initiative #1: Number of workplace charging ports

39 20 20 AEP

Progress Indicator #1: Workplace charging city policy development

30% 0% Moved to Policy Group

Progress Indicator #2: Partner employers signed pledge form to install EV charging infrastructure

3 0

Moved to Policy Group

Fleet Charging - Initiative 5.4

Initiative: 300 charging ports for Columbus and other public fleets

6 _ _

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Building and Zoning Changes to Support EV Charging - Initiative 5.5

Progress Indicator: Site plan cases submitted for permit

3 1 AEP

Section 3: RISK REGISTER

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Section 4: PERFORMANCE METRICS PLAN

PERFORMANCE METRICS PLAN - Version 1.2 July 10, 2017 This performance metrics plan (PMP) supports the Smart Columbus Electrification Project

(SCEP), providing traceability, verification, and responsibility of the targeted goals that support

the implementation of the SCEP initiatives. This includes overall project goals, performance

indicators for projects, priorities and initiatives, and other indicators of progress along the way.

As the ultimate goal of the SCEP enabled by the Vulcan grant is de-carbonization, wherever

feasible the indicators are further extended to estimates of green-house-gas (GHG) reduction at

the overall project level. This PMP is organized consistent with the five primary project priorities

and their related initiatives as conveyed by the SCEP agreement with Vulcan.

Overall Performance Metrics Plan Objectives, Principles, and Organization

1.0 Objectives

The objective of this performance metrics plan (PMP) is to layout a framework for the reporting

of quantitative progress towards accomplishing of the objectives of the SCEPs, the identification

and collection of various data sets, and the methodologies to process the data into performance

metrics that support the execution, analysis, and reporting of performance indicators at all levels

along the way. It serves as a resource for the various stake holders involved in carrying out the

SCEP to be informed of the required reporting and to provide the required data that supports

documenting the accomplishments of program. The plan encompasses the goals, performance

indicators, and trackable initiatives to be quantitatively reported, the requirements of the data

the will be collected to support the reporting, and the processing of the data to create effective

performance measure indicating attainment of goas and the ultimate GHG reduction to validate

the success of the Vulcan grant program.

To the extent possible and within the financial resources of the contract, it is the intent of SCEP

to validate the performance indicators based on primary data, that is data directly observed or

collected as part of the SCEP program activities. There are instances where secondary data

sources (such as published national or regional averages) will need to be utilized because direct

observations are infeasible or cost prohibitive. One such example of secondary data is the

utilization of EVs adopted by consumers in which published averages of consumer vehicle miles

traveled on an annual basis will be used in the calculation of GHG benefits. Even in such

situations, indirect data can be complimented (or validated) with surveys of the population.

However, it is the goal to use primary data for the majority of the program, ensuring that

appropriate data collection and reporting are incorporated from the beginning.

1.1 Principles and Framework

This PMP is developed concurrently with the USDOT Smart City award which concentrates on

the deployment of connected and automated vehicles and transportation infrastructure to

increase mobility, increase safety, reduce energy and GHG emissions, and enhance quality of

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

life, particularly with respect to underserved communities. The principles of the SCEP PMP

merges with the overall USDOT data management plan (DMP) governing the larger Smart

Columbus project. The data from the SCEP PMP will be part of the Integrated Data Exchange

(IDE) as outlined in the USDOT data management plan (DMP) which emphasizes open data,

data sharing, and an agile approach to developing software to support the program objectives.

Data items collected to support SCEP PMP will be integrated into the USDOT funded Columbus

IDE for reuse, sharing, curation, and application development.

1.2 Roles/responsibilities

The Smart Columbus Program Management Office (PMO) will be the central coordinator with

respect to the collection, analysis, and dissemination of performance metrics and reporting

described herein, and will fall under the responsibility of the PMO performance measures

coordinator. It will be the responsibility of the PMO performance measures coordinator to insure

that all partners are cognizant of the PMP, that all participants assess performance in conformity

with the PMP, and that the PMP satisfies the needs of the projects, participants and sponsors.

As such, the PMP will be revised from time to time, such that is responsive to the needs of the

SCEP as it evolves through implementation and feedback. It is also the responsibility of the

SCEP performance measures coordinator to monitor the adequacy of the plan, and suggest

revisions and extensions in collaboration with the PMO, Vulcan, project partners, and supporting

working groups.

The PMO performance measures coordinator will provide templates and guidelines as

appropriate to guide the multiple stakeholders in submitting data. It will be the responsibility of

the performance measures coordinator to insure the appropriate descriptors (meta-data) is

available, and consistent formats are used across initiatives.

1.3 Sharing, preservation and protection SCEP will rely on the framework of the Integrated Data Exchange (IDE) in co-development

under the USDOT concurrent Smart City grant award. The IDE will provide the sharing,

preservation and protection architecture.

1.4 Terminology Performance indicators are addressed at three levels: the overall project level, the five project

priorities (grid de-carbonization, EV fleet adoption, Transit, Autonomous and Multi-Modal

Systems in the City, EV consumer adoption, and EV charging infrastructure), and the specific

initiatives under each priority area.

Project, priority, and initiative indicators are provided and are hierarchical. Priority indicators

contribute directly to a project indicator, and similarly initiative indicators contribute directly to

one of their respective priority indicators. Progress indicators are also defined. Progress

indicators encompass anything that can be numerically evaluated and reflects progress towards

objectives, but does not contribute directly to either higher level indicators. Examples of project,

priority, initiative and progress indicators are provided below.

Category #1: Project Indicators

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

EX: Project Objective: To measurably decrease GHG emissions originating from the

Columbus Metropolitan Area (7 county region) transportation system during the

time period of the grant.

Project Indicator:

#3) Total New EV's Added to the Region (Consumer + Fleet)

Category #2: Priority Indicators – example from Priority 2 – Fleet Electric Vehicle

Adoption

EX. Priority Goal/Objective: Work with public, private and academic sectors to

integrate a minimum of 780 electric vehicles into their fleets by the end of 2019.

(300 public fleet, 450 private fleet, 30 Transportation Network Companies)

Priority Indicator: Fleet Electric Vehicles Purchased

Category #3: Initiative Indicators – example from Priority 2, initiative 2.1, Public Fleet

Adoption

EX. Initiative Objective: Work with public and academic sectors to integrate a

minimum of 300 electric vehicles into their fleets by the end of 2019.

Initiative Indicator: Number of EVs purchased within public fleets

Project, priority, and initiative indicators have overall targets for the life of the project.

These overall targets are typically subdivided in quarterly targets for tracking/reporting

purposes.

Category #4: Progress Indicators

All other types of report indicators apart from project, priority and initiative indicators

previously explained will be progress indicators. Such indicators are countable, but do

not directly contribute to a higher level indicator. Progress indicators will assist the team

in tracking and reporting on activities. Progress indicators also help validate if the

resources invested in a specific strategy are having the expected effect or “moving the

needle” on the priority indicators (which have defined targets based on objectives).

EX. Progress Indicator under Public Fleets Initiative 2.1:

Progress Indicator #1: # of contacts made with other government or institution

Some progress indicators will be included within the grant agreement, but others will be

developed as the program progresses and new strategies and activities are launched (for

example, initial market assessment in Q1 may result in new strategies and associated indicators

to be tracked in the remaining quarters).

As appropriate for each indicator the following are defined for performance metrics.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

1. Definitions of terms or phrases used in the indicators. For example, in the example

project indicator, what constitutes an electric vehicle? Are only light duty vehicles

included in the goal, or do EVs include golf carts or all-terrain off-road vehicles as well?

2. Data needed for estimating the performance measure. For example, vehicle

make/model of EVs acquired by fleets, and miles driven by each vehicle in a public fleet.

3. Area (or location) where data should be collected for estimating the performance

measure. For example, for consumer adoption the seven county area encompassing the

City of Columbus will define the target goal. The area for most indicators will be the

seven county area unless otherwise stated.

4. Temporal resolution or extent of the data needed for estimating the performance

measure. For example, consumer EV registrations may be analyzed on a quarterly

basis.

5. Method to estimating the performance measure. This may be a high-level algorithmic

approach, modeling procedure, or pseudocode. In some instances, existing analytical

tools may be used to estimate a measure. For example, EPA’s MOVES may be used to

estimate emissions based on vehicle speeds collected from the field.

6. Baseline measure for existing conditions. For example, the increase in consumer

adoption of EVs is factored from the number of registered EVs as of Dec 31, 2016.

7. Assumptions used in estimating performance indicators.

1.5 Organization Starting with section 2.0, this document follows as closely as possible to the order of the project,

priorities and initiatives as outlined in the overall agreement, specifically section 2.0. The

project, priority and initiative objectives and indicators are duplicated from section 3.0 of the

Columbus Electrification Plan, and then additional detail (Definitions, Data, Area, Temporal

Resolution, Method, Baseline Measure, and Assumption) are provided for each indicator as

appropriate. Progress indicators from section 3.0 of the agreement are also carried over to the

PMP for additional detail. Note, additional progress indicators may be developed as the project

evolves and new information learned and new strategies are developed. As a result, as the

project progresses and new strategies develop, this performance metrics plan (PMP) will be

updated and will contain indicators not present in the original Columbus Electrification Plan

(CEP).

Section 2 of this PMP provides detail for the project level indicators.

Section 3,4,5,6 and 7 provide detail for the priorities 1 through 5 respectively, as well as the

initiatives and strategies associated with each priority.

The numbering scheme used in the CEP is used/referenced whenever possible for ease of

cross-reference.

All targets listed as TBD will be finalized by the respective Smart Columbus working groups no

later than quarter 4 of grant period unless otherwise noted. Timelines for indicators contingent

upon Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approval will be adjusted as approval is

received.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Overall Project Goals Project Goal/Objective: To measurably decrease transportation GHG emissions expressed in

equivalent metric tons of carbon dioxide (MTeCO2) as a result of grid de -

carbonization, EV fleet adoption, transit, autonomous and multi-modal systems

(implemented via USDOT grant agreement) and consumer EV adoption during grant

period compared to a baseline year (2016).

Project Indicator/s:

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Project Indicator 1: % GHG emission reductions from baseline year

- - - - TBD TBD TBD TBD

Project Indicator 2: Total GHG reductions/savings from baseline

year (MTeCO2) - - - - TBD TBD TBD TBD

Project Target/s: See table above. Any TBD will be determined by 4th Quarter by the Smart Columbus

program management office (PMO)

Definitions: GHG : Green House Gases

MTeCO2: Metric Ton equivalent of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Area: Unless otherwise stated, the area will include the seven counties containing and

adjoining Columbus (Franklin, Delaware, Fairfield, Licking, Pickaway, Madison,

Union). Exceptions to, and methods to estimate the seven county impact from

larger spatial aggregations are addressed on a case by case basis depending on the

initiative/strategy.

Temporal: Updated / reported quarterly

Methods: Each indicator is summed from contributing priorities and their respective

initiatives. See the methodologies cited under priorities and initiatives. Only

technical methodologies that are well published and broadly accepted in the

community will be utilized.

Baseline Measures: Baseline year: 2016 unless otherwise stated

Assumptions:

Tracking Progress:

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Project Indicator 1: % GHG - - - -

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

emission reductions from baseline year

Project Indicator 2: Total GHG reductions/savings from baseline

year (MTeCO2) - - - -

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Priority 1 – Electric Supply De-Carbonization Priority Objective: In partnership with power providers, by 2030 install 905 MW of utility scale

renewable energy generation capable of serving the Columbus region, procure a

minimum of 1.2 million MWh of renewable energy for the City of Columbus

between 2017 and 2022 and save an additional 0.33% of MWh consumed through

energy efficiency and smart grid programs during the time period of the grant.

Priority Indicator/s:

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority 1 Indicator #1: MW of renewable energy capacity installed - - - - - 5 MW TBD

905 MW by 2030

Priority 1 Indicator #2 : MWh of

renewable electricity consumed

50,760

MWh 230,760

MWh 242,86

0 MWh 1.2M MWh

Priority 1 Indicator #3: MWH of

energy saved (new renewable energy or energy efficiency)

- - - - - TBD TBD

0.33% (MWh TBD)1

Priority Target/s: See table above. TBD to be determined by Smart Columbus PMO by June 30, 2017.

Tracking Progress:

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority 1 Indicator #1: MW of renewable energy capacity installed - - - - -

Priority 1 Indicator #2 : MWh of renewable electricity consumed

DOP

AEP Priority 1 Indicator #3: MWH of energy saved (new renewable energy or energy efficiency)

- - - - -

Definitions: Renewable Energy Capacity : To be defined by the Electrification – Grid

Modernization (EGM) working group

Renewable Electricity Consumed : Actual MWh of renewable energy utilized in the

seven county region. To be further refined by the EGM working group.

Energy Saved : MWH of electricity saved through efforts outlined in the strategies.

1 Projected impact for the Columbus region will be calculated in MWh during the first quarter of grant period.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Data: Each contributing initiative provides estimates of power/energy. See contributing

initiative indicators

Area: The seven counties containing and encompassing Columbus except where noted.

Temporal: Life of project extends to 2030 when all renewable power strategies in this project

are anticipated to be online.

Methods: See methods form initiatives and strategies. The energy and power are cumulative

across the initiatives in 1.1 and 1.2.

Baseline Measures: Baseline year: 2016

Assumptions:

INITIATIVE 1.1: UTILITY SCALE RENEWABLES Initiative Objective: By 2030, deploy 900 MW of utility scale wind and solar in the state of Ohio, 5MW

of hydro in the Columbus region and between 2017 and 2022 procure a minimum of 1.2 million MWh of

renewable energy in the City of Columbus.

INITIATIVE INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1.1 Initiative Indicator #1: 905 MW by 2030 - - - - -

5MW Hydro

Instal led

- 905 MW

(2030)

1.1 Initiative Indicator #2: Renewable energy MWh consumed

50,760 MWh

230,760 MWh

242,860 MWh

1.2M MWh

(2017-2022)

1.1 Overall Initiative Indicator/s

Initiative Indictor/s: See table above Target/s: See table above

Details Definition/s:

Method: Combined contributions from strategies 1,3 & 5 #1 Cumulative power capacity in MWH from strategies 1.1.1 and 1.1.7

#2 Cumulative renewable energy consumed in MWH from strategies 1.1.3, 1.1.5., 1.1.6, and 1.1.7 (without double counting)

1.1.1 Strategy: AEP Wind and Solar Generation (Section 2: 2.1.1)

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Initiative Indictor/s – (contributes to overall initiative indicator 1.1):

Capacity of new installation of combination of wind solar combined Target: 900 MW to be installed over life of project (2030)

Details

Definition/s:

Data: Area:

Method: Combined solar and wind generation capacity Documentation / certification of added capacity to be provided by AEP in collaboration

with EGM working group.

1.1.2 Strategy: AEP Research and Development (Section 2: 1.1.2)

No indicators associated with this strategy. See milestones/deliverable table.

1.1.3 Strategy: AEP Distributed Generation Coordination of New Customer Installation (Section 2: 1.1.3)

Progress Indictor/s:

Number of New AEP Distributed Energy Customers Target:

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 LOP

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

TBD TBD TBD TBD 50 50 50 TBD Tracking Progress:

Details Method:

The estimate/measure of renewable energy through distributed power to be provided by AEP.

1.1.4 Strategy: Columbus Division of Power Solar Generator Deployment – DC Solar (Section 2: 1.1.4)

Progress Indictor/s: Number of deployments of 10 mobile solar generators or electric vehicle (EV) charging ports.

Target: Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 LOP Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total - TBD TBD TBD 15 TBD TBD TBD

Tracking Progress:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Details

1.1.5 Strategy: Columbus Division of Power Green Power Purchase Agreement (Section 2: 1.1.5) Progress Indictors:

#1 Total green power (MWh) consumed in service area. #2 Number of customers contacted about Green Power Purchase options

Target/s

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 - - - - 50760 230,760 232860 1.2 M #2 0 0 13000 0 13000 TBD TBD

Details Definition/s:

Green power is defined as renewable energy certificates from any of the resources defined as Alternative Energy Resource, including Advanced Energy Resources and Renewable Energy Resource as defined in the Ohio Revised Code.

Contacted customer : [TBD]

Data: When delivery occurs, it will be accompanied by an Attestation Form that specifies the

Renewable Energy Resource, REC quantities, period of generation and other information.

Area: Region covered by Columbus Division of Power Baseline: Current percent of green power in DOP portfolio

Data: Total power from non-green sources in 2016

Method: The amount of GHG emission reduction for the City’s total Green Power will be

calculated based on the savings from net power purchased each year: GHG Emission Reduction for Net Generation, MT CO2e/yr

For Biomass Energy: Biomass and other organic matter are left to decay within the project boundary, and methane is emitted to the atmosphere, possibly with capture of LFG and destruction through flaring to comply with regulations or contractual requirements. Baseline emissions shall exclude methane emissions that would have to be removed to comply with national or local safety requirements or legal regulations. • Project emissions consist of : (a) CO2 emissions from fossil fuel or electricity used by the project activity facilities (PEpower,y); (b) Emissions from flaring or combustion of the gas stream (PEflare,y); (c) Emissions from the landfill gas upgrading process (PEprocess,y), where applicable.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

PEy = PEpower, y + PEflare, y + PEprocess, y Where: PEy = Project emission in year y (t CO2e) PEpower, y = Emissions from the use of fossil fuel or electricity for the operation of the installed facilities in the year y (t CO2e) PEflare, y = Emissions from flaring or combustion of the landfill gas stream in the year y (t CO2e) PEprocess, y = Emissions from the landfill gas upgrading process in the year y (t CO2e) 1 Calculation based on the Clean Development Mechanism Landf ill methane recovery methodology • The amount of GHG emission reduction for the total MWh of renewable electricity generated annually: GHG Emission Reduction for Net Generation, MT CO2e/yr

Assumptions:

The reported emission value for power generation is 1,387 MT CO2e per megawatt hour (MWh) for the region containing Columbus (per the EPA eGRID 2012).

1.1.6 Strategy: DOP Waste Water Treatment Plan, Co-Generation (Section 2: 1.1.6)

Initiative Indictor/s: GHG reduction from estimated 5000 MWh output from Co-Generation offset grid power

requirements.

Target/s: Reduction of 5000 MWh over the 30 year life of project

Details Definition/s:

Data: Area:

Method: • The amount of GHG emission reduction for each CHP system will be calculated based

on the energy production from one and two engines at each plant. This analysis will account for the savings from net electrical generation from CHP and the additional net natural gas usage with each system. The net GHG reduction can also be expressed by the number of averaged sized cars removed from the road which emit 4.75 MT CO2e per year:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

GHG Emission Reduction for Net Generation, MT CO2e/yr GHG Emission Reduction for from Additional Natural Gas, MT CO2e/yr Net Reduction in GHG Footprint, MT CO2e/yr Equivalent Annual Cars Removed from Roads 1Calculation based on Arcadis consultant CoGen study.

Assumptions:

The reported emission value for power generation is 1,387 MT CO2e per megawatt hour (MWh) for the region containing Columbus (per the EPA eGRID 2012).

1.1.7 Strategy: Columbus Division of Power Hydroelectric Improvements (Section 2: 1.1.7) Initiative Indictor/s:

#1 MW capacity as a result of rehabilitation the City’s 5 MW hydroelectric plant located in the O’Shaughnessy Dam – additive to overall initiative indicator 1.1 #1

#2 MWh generated – additive to overall initiative indicator 1.1 #2

Target/s: 5MW capacity by end of 2018

10 MWh/yr starting in 2019

Details Definition/s:

Data: Total hours of operation and MWh generated in a three year period. Baseline: Plant generated 9,700 MWh (2013) and 7,300 MWh (2014). It ceased operations in

2015.

Assumptions: Plant nameplate capacity is 5MW Plant nameplate capacity is 5MW

The reported emission value for power generation is 1,387 MT CO2e per megawatt hour (MWh) for the region containing Columbus (per the EPA eGRID 2012).

Method: Estimate of MWh of energy

The amount of GHG emission reduction for the City’s hydroelectric plant will be calculated based on the additional MWh produced and hours of operation after improvements are implemented: GHG Emission Reduction for Net Generation, MT CO2e/yr

INITIATIVE 1.2: GRID MODERNIZATION AND EFFICIENCY

Initiative Objective: AEP and Columbus Division of Power will deploy energy efficiency programs, grid

modernization projects, which include battery storage installations, street and area light upgrades, AEP’s

gridSMART 2.0 upgrade, and expanded capacity programs that support renewables and electric vehicles.

1.2 Overall Initiative Indicator/s

Initiative Indictor/s:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

#1 Combined Energy Efficiency – MWh saved

#2 % GHG emission reductions from baseline year #3 Total GHG reductions/savings from [baseline year] (MTeCO2)

Targets

TBD by EGM working group by 6/30/2017 Details

Definition/s: Data:

Area: Method:

1.2.1 Strategy: AEP Energy Efficiency (Section 2: 1.2.1) Progress Indictors:

Expand Community Energy Savers (CES) program. Increase annual improvement in energy efficiency from 1% to 1.33% through a three-fold increase in CES participants.

Target/s: Threefold increase in CES participants

Details Baseline: Current 1% annual improvement in energy efficiency

Data: To be reported through AEP

Method: TBD : The method of documenting participation and estimating MWh saved, and ultimately GHG avoided will be provided by AEP by June 2017

1.2.2 AEP Vehicle to Grid Research (Section 2: 1.2.2)

No associated metrics with these deliverables

1.2.3 Strategy: AEP gridSMart Phase 2 AMI Meter Deployment (Section 2: 1.2.3)

Progress Indictor: Expand its gridSMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) to customers.

Target: TBD – AEP by July 1, 2017

Details Baseline:

Data: Method:

1.2.4 Strategy: AEP Microgrids and Battery Storage (Section 2: 1.2.4)

Progress Indictor: Expand its gridSMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) to customers.

Target: One by end of year 2, 1 to 2 by end of year 3 Details

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Baseline:

Data: Method: To be reported by AEP

1.2.5 Strategy: AEP Smart Lighting (Section 2: 1.2.5)

Progress Indictor: Number of installed and operating AEP owned Smart Street and Area Lighting controls on

existing AEP street and area lights. (Targets for 2017)

Target: TBD by EGM working group by 6/30/2017 Details

Baseline: Number of smart street light installed as of Dec 31, 2016 Data:

Method: To be reported by AEP

See methodology for GHG and power save from 1.2.7 below.

1.2.6 Columbus DOP Grid Modernization – AMI Meters (Section 2: 1.2.6)

Progress Indictors: Number of AMI meters installed

Target: 10,000 by end of year 2 Details

Baseline: Number of installed as of Dec 31, 2016

Data: Method: Associated GHG Emission Reduction Method

Assumptions: From the meter reading perspective, the project estimates a reduction in 24 vehicles that average 7,000 miles a year. Baseline: Number of vehicles used in 2016 to read meters, miles per gallon and averages miles driven per day/month. The net GHG reduction will be expressed by the number of averaged sized cars removed from the road per year which emit 4.75 MT CO2e per year (per EPA eGRID 2012). Net Reduction in GHG Footprint, MT CO2e/yr Equivalent Annual Cars Removed from Roads

1.2.7 Columbus DOP Street Light Technology Conversion (Section 2: 1.2.7)

Progress Indictors: Number of LED Street Lights Installed

Target: 700 in first year, total number TBD (Dec 31, 2017)

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Details

Baseline: Number of installed as of Dec 31, 2016 Data: Number of installed and operating reported by Columbus DOP

Method: Associated GHG Emission Reduction Method

Data: Estimate the nameplate/rated power (Watts) of existing luminaires. Daily hours of usage. Baseline: Assumptions: As 2015, there are approximately 52,000 existing street lights that the Division of Power is responsible for maintaining. This represents approximately 65% of the city’s streets. Calculate the gross electricity savings by comparing the total average power of the project luminaires multiplied by project annual hours of operation, with the average power of the baseline luminaires multiplied by baseline annual hours of operation (daily hours times 365 or other number equal to the number of days per year that the lights are expected to be operated); Calculate the net electricity saving (NES) by correcting the gross electricity savings for any leakage and transmission & distribution losses. See Appendix B: LED Streetlight Conversion – GHG Calculation Methodology for full calculation details.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

4.0 Priority 2 – Fleet Adoption

Priority Objective: Work with public, private and academic sectors to integrate a minimum of 780

electric vehicles into their fleets by the end of 2019 (300 public fleet, 450 private

fleet, 30 Transportation Network Companies).

Priority Indicator/s:

INDICATO RS 2017

2018 2019 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority Indicator 2: Fleet Electric Vehicles Purchased - - 5 115 120 205 455 780

Priority Target: 780 Vehicles over 3 years

Data: Reported #, type (make, model), and miles driven

Area: Seven county area encompassing the City of Columbus

Temporal: Quarterly reporting to track the priority indicator

Baseline: As of Dec 31, 2016

Tracking Progress:

INDICATO RS 2017

2018 2019 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority Indicator 2: Fleet Electric Vehicles Purchased (8)*

*AEP in process of placing eight vehicles on order, 6 PHEVs and 2 EVs. Need to better

INITIATIVE 2.1: PUBLIC FLEETS

Initiative Objective: Work with public and academic sectors to integrate a minimum of 300

electric vehicles into their fleets by the end of 2019.

2.1. Overall Initiative Indicator/s - combined from Section 2 : Strategy 2.1.1 & 2.1.2 Initiative Indictor/s:

Number of public fleet vehicles adopted

Targets 300 public fleet electric vehicles by end of 2019

2017 – 100 total, 2018 – 100 total, 2019 – 100 total

Details Definition/s

EV : Either battery electric (BEV) or Plug-in Hybird Electric (PHEV) on road vehicles Baseline: Initial fleet inventory of vehicles, (including number and type)

Data: Each fleet on a quarterly basis report existing inventory of EVs (year, make, model) at

beginning of quarter

Mileage over previous quarter on each EV.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

New EV acquisitions in the fleet during the quarter (year, make, model), and any mileage on new vehicles.

Average mileage for non EVs in the fleet on a quarterly basis. Area:

Method: GHG Emissions Reduction Method See Appendix A - Evaluating the effectiveness of Electric Vehicle adoption for reduction

of GHG for procedure and details of methodology

Contact information with respect to Public Fleets:

City of Columbus: Kelly Reagan

Franklin County: Charlotte Ashcraft

Ohio State University: Beth

City of Dublin:

Arlington:

Hilliard:

2.1. Progress Indicator/s - combined from Section 2 : Strategy 2.1.1 & 2.1.2 Progress Indictor:

#1 Number of contacts made with other governments or institutions #2 Municipal governments or institutions pledged to electrification (fleet analysis and VAP)

Target/s

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30

year)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 5 10 10 10 35

TBD (12/31/2017)

TBD (12/31/2018)

#2 0 0 5 5 10

TBD (12/31/2017)

TBD (12/31/2018)

Tracking Progress

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30

year)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 15 #2 6

Details

Definition/s Contact: Documented communication (email, written, phone), with organization

explaining the Smart Columbus initiative and inviting the institution to participate through collaboration (attendance at meetings and events) and pledging support.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Pledge: Documented official communication from government or institution indicating aspirational goal of EV committed to purchase.

2.1.3 Strategy: Training and Technical Assistance (Section 2: 2.1.3) Progress Indictor:

Number of training sessions held: City of Columbus and public partner training sessions, i.e., operators, technicians, first responders

Target:

CY2017 Q1-0, Q2-0, Q3-1, Q4-1 Total 2, CY2018 - 4 total, CY2019 - 4

Details Definition/s

Training Session: To be provided by Fleet Working Group by 3/31/2017

INITIATIVE 2.2: PRIVATE FLEETS Initiative Objective: Work with private partners to secure purchase commitments for 450

electric vehicles by the end of 2019.

2.2. Overall Initiative Indicator/s - from Section 2 : Strategy 2.2.1

Initiative Indictor/s: Number of private fleet vehicles adopted

Targets 450 private fleet electric vehicles by end of 2019

CY2017 Q1-0, Q2-0, Q3-5, Q4-15 Total 20 CY2018 - 100 total, CY2019 – 330 total Life of project: 450

Details

Definition/s

EV : Either battery electric (BEV) or Plug-in Hybird Electric (PHEV) on road vehicles Baseline: Initial fleet inventory of vehicles, (including number and type)

Data: Each fleet on a quarterly basis report existing inventory of EVs (year, make, model) at

beginning of quarter

Mileage over previous quarter on each EV. New EV acquisitions in the fleet during the quarter (year, make, model), and any

mileage on new vehicles.

Average mileage for non EVs in the fleet on a quarterly basis. Area:

Method: GHG Emissions Reduction Method

See Appendix A - Evaluating the effectiveness of Electric Vehicle adoption for reduction

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

of GHG for procedure and details of methodology

2.2.1. Strategy: Recruit Columbus Partnership Members’ Fleet Managers (Section 2: 2.2.1)

Progress Indictor/s: #1 Number of private sector training sessions

#2 Number of distributed EV survey/assessment documents #3 New private companies pledged to electrification (fleet analysis and VAP)

#4 New private fleet vehicles pledged to electrification #5 Number of completed vehicle analysis acquisition plans

Target/s

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 0 1 1 1 3 TBD – (12/31/17)

TBD (12/2018)

#2 50 1300 ? ? 1350 TBD (12/31/2017)

TBD (12/31/2018)

#3 2 3 5 5 15 15 8 #4 30 45 60 60 195 195 60

#5 5 10 15 20 50 50 100 Tracking Progress

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 0

#2 0 #3 2

#4 0 #5 1

Details Definition/s

Training Session: To be provided by Fleet Working Group (FWG) by 3/31/2017

EV survey/assessment document: To be provided by FWG by 3/31/2017 Pledge to Electrification (fleet analysis and VAP): To be provided by FWG by

3/31/2017

Pledge of Fleet Vehicles: To be provided by FWG by 3/31/2017 Vehicle Analysis Acquisition Plan: To be provided by FWG by 3/31/2017

INITIATIVE 2.3: TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES, TAXIS, AND CAR SHARE

Initiative Objective: Work with Transportation Service Providers to place in operation a

minimum of 30 electric vehicles into their fleets by the end of 2019.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

2.3. Overall Initiative Indicator/s - from Section 2 : Strategy 2.3.1

Initiative Indictor/s: Number of EVs in TNCs, Taxis and Car Shares

Targets

30 EVs by end of 2019 CY2017 - 0 total, CY2018 - 5 total, CY2019 – 25 total

Details Definition/s

EV : Either battery electric (BEV) or Plug-in Hybird Electric (PHEV) on road vehicles Baseline: Initial fleet inventory of vehicles, (including number and type)

Data:

Area:

Method: GHG Emissions Reduction Method See Appendix A - Evaluating the effectiveness of Electric Vehicle adoption for reduction

of GHG for procedure and details of methodology

2.3.1. Strategy: Recruit Transportation Network Company Business Partners (Section 2: 2.3.1) Progress Indictor/s:

#1 Number of contacts made with TNCs

#2 TNC’s pledged to electrification (fleet analysis and VAP) Target:

#1 CY2017 Q1-0, Q2-0, Q-3, Q4-7 Total 10 CY2018 – TBD by 12/31/2017, CY2019 – TBD by 12/31/2018

#2 CY2017 - 0 total, CY2018 – 5, CY2019 – TBD by 12/31/2018

Details Definition/s

Contact: Documented communication (email, written, phone), with organization explaining the Smart Columbus initiative and inviting the institution to participate through collaboration (attendance at meetings and events) and pledging support.

Pledge to Electrification (fleet analysis and VAP): To be provided by FWG by 3/31/2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

5.0 Priority 3 – Transit, Autonomous and Multi-Modal Systems in the City

Priority Objective: Ensure a comprehensive, multi-modal approach to decarbonizing the Columbus

region’s mobility options.

Priority Indicator/s:

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority 3 Indicator #1: Total GHG reductions/savings from baseline year (MTeCO2)

- - - - - TBD TBD TBD

Progress Indicator #1: Autonomous Electric Vehicles Deployed (USDOT)

- - - - - - 6 6

Progress Indicator #2: Number of platooning truck trips (USDOT) - - - - - - TBD TBD

Progress Indicator #3: Number of b icycles deployed (USDOT) - - - - - - 50 50

Progress Indicator #4: Bike lane miles added - - - 5 5 5 5

25 miles by 2020

Priority Target: See table above

Definitions: TBD in conjunction with USDOT Smart Columbus program management

Data:

Area: Seven county area encompassing the City of Columbus

Temporal: Quarterly reporting to track the priority indicator

Baseline: 2016 Calendar Year

Assumptions: Indicators for Priority 3 align with USDOT grant requirements. Targets will be set in

alignment with USDOT project evolution.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

6.0 Priority 4 – Consumer Electric Vehicle Adoption Priority Objective: Increase electric vehicle market adoption (percentage of new registrations of new

and used vehicles) in Columbus and the surrounding seven county region to 1.8% by

the end of the three year grant period, representing a 486% increase from 2015

baseline of 0.37%.

Priority Indicator: Number of registered EVs (number and percentage) in the Columbus region

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority 4 Indicator #1: EV Market Penetration (EVs purchased divided by total vehicles purchased)

0.40% 0.50% 0.70% 0.80% 0.80% 1.10% 1.80% 1.80%

Priority 4 Indicator #2: Estimated equivalent number of EVs purchased 92 114 160 183 549 1007 1647 3200

Tracking Progress: Number of registered EVs (number and percentage) in the Columbus region

INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority 4 Indicator #1: EV Market Penetration (EVs purchased divided by total vehicles purchased)

0.44%

Priority 4 Indicator #2: Estimated equivalent number of EVs purchased 115*

* Based on Polk data

Priority Target: 1.8% of vehicles purchased will be EVs by end of the three year project.

Approximate number of EVs purchased is provided in indicator #2 based on

estimated annual sales of all light-duty vehicles. 3200 represents the total number

of EV vehicles added to the seven county consumer fleet based on a projection of

91500 vehicles sales yearly (new registrations). Targets for number of EV sales will

be based on percentage of all vehicle sales for the seven county area.

Data: Vehicle registration database accessed either commercially (Polk) or directly

through Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Area: Seven county region surrounding Columbus (Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking,

Madison, Pickaway, Union)

Temporal: Reported quarterly during the three year period

Baseline: Number of registered EVs in the Columbus region as of Dec 31, 2016

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Assumptions: Both BEVs and PHEVs will be reported quarterly.

Number of miles driven for EVs will be based on available survey data for the region.

GHG Emissions Reduction Method:

See Appendix A - Evaluating the effectiveness of Electric Vehicle adoption for

reduction of GHG for procedure and details of methodology

EV Adoption According to Vehicle Registration Records

Columbus region registration data is reflected in the tables below from the periods beginning in 2014

through April 2017.

2014 and 2015 registration data was obtained through summary information from IIHS Polk aggregated

at the National Renewable Energy Lab based on Polk Subscription data.

2016 vehicle registration data was also obtained through IIHS Polk, but the base data set were more

detailed, quarterly statistics were aggregated from monthly queries of fuel type and model years.

2017 vehicle registration data (Jan through April) was obtained through specific Polk data acquisition by

Smart Columbus, aggregated into monthly totals for PHEV and BEV against all registrations.

The data shared in the table below is the percent of new vehicle sales (meaning ‘new vehicles’ entering

the overall fleet) based on registration data.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

The 2016 data set was detailed enough that the total number of EVs in the fleet (not just new vehicle

sales) could be assessed. Out of approximately 1.7 million registered vehicles in the area, 2197 are VEV

or PHEV – for a percentage of about 0.13%.

Smart Columbus is in the midst of gaining access directly to the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Once

available and processed, more detailed location specific queries can be run and a greater level of detail

shared both publically and with Smart Columbus partners for research and marketi ng.

INITIATIVE 4.1: RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT

Initiative Objective: Develop performance measures through researching and assessing the local market shifts and behavioral change related to electric vehicles in order to validate, inform, and measure the strategies and tactics undertaken as part of Consumer Adoption.

EV PHEV TOTAL(EV+PHEV) TOTAL SALES

2014

Q1 17 35 52 27310 0.19%

Q2 40 74 114 29830 0.38%

Q3 38 37 75 26600 0.28%

Q4 32 28 60 14070 0.43%

Yearly Total 127 174 301 97820 0.31%

2015

Q1 36 46 82 26750 0.31%

Q2 26 64 90 13490 0.67%

Q3 44 64 108 37180 0.29%

Q4 31 50 81 19910 0.41%

Yearly Total 137 224 361 97320 0.37%

2016

Q1 33 61 94 24730 0.38%

Q2 42 102 144 28330 0.51%

Q3 55 189 244 27630 0.88%

Q4 63 125 188 20880 0.90%

Yearly Total 193 477 670 101580 0.66%

2017

Jan 21 18 39 7280 0.54%

Feb 14 15 29 8790 0.33%

Mar 24 23 47 10030 0.47%

Q1 Total 59 56 115 26100 0.44%

Apr 19 13 32 8660 0.37%

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

4.1.1. Strategy: Consumer Research (Section 2: 4.1.1)

Description: In order to create sustained consumer demand for EVs a culture shift must occur in the attitude of consumers towards EVs. Greater focus will be placed on early adopters. Consumer perception change will be closely monitored and measured throughout the grant period to ensure preferences move in a positive direction toward EVs. During quarter one of the grant period, research parameters and methodologies will be developed. A survey of the Columbus population will be conducted at the beginning of year one and at the end of year three of the project. Survey will track awareness, consideration, and perception.

4.1.2. Strategy: Consumer Research (Section 2: 4.1.2)

Description: The Columbus sales environment of EVs and the dealer attitudes toward selling EV models will be assessed with the objective of (1) understanding the baseline interest and attitude towards selling EVs and (2) measuring the culminating impact the Smart Columbus Electrification Plan has on the favorability of EVs among dealers.

4.1.3. Strategy: Consumer Research (Section 2: 4.1.3)

Description: The availability of EV models will be monitored and measured to ensure product is increasingly available through the duration of the grant period and is on par with model availability in peer cities and ZEV states.

Progress Indictor/s across all three strategies:

4.1 #1 Perceived Desirability of EV Ownership, Consumer likelihood to buy a PEV or PHEV as their next car, Consumer perception of barriers to own an EV (as measured on a Likert scale)

4.1 #2 Salespeople confidence in ability to sell an EV (as measured on a Likert scale)

4.1 #3 Consumer satisfaction with dealer knowledge of EVs (as measured on a Likert scale) 4.1 #4 Salespeople confidence in ability to sell an EV compared to fossil fuel model (as

measured on a Likert scale)

4.1 #5 Salespeople interest in selling an EV (as measured on a Likert scale) Details #1 through #5

Baseline: Survey results in year one of the program to be compared with survey results from year 3 of the program

4.1 #6 Progress Indicator: Total number of EV models available in the Columbus Market

4.1 #7 Ratio of models sold at dealerships in Columbus vs. models sold in the U.S. 4.1 #8 Ratio of dealerships selling PEVs and PHEVs vs. total operating dealerships in the

Columbus area

4.1 #9 Amount of used EV models sold in the Columbus Market 4.1 #10 Ratio of OEMs supplying PEVs and PHEVs in Columbus vs. OEMs supplying models in the

U.S.

Details #6 through #10 Targets: Targets to be established by EV Adoption Team by quarter three of the project.

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

INITIATIVE 4.2: ADDRESS SUPPLY – Section 2: 4.2, including strategies 4.2.1 through 4.2.4

Initiative Objective: Engage in partnerships with local car dealerships and Original Equipment

Manufacturers (OEMs) to secure a satisfactory supply of new and used EVs and improve the

sales environment of these models to satisfy the increased consumer demand created during

the life of the grant.

PRO GRESS INDICATO RS Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

4.2 Progress Indicator #1: Total Dealer and OEM Partner

Pledges Received - 2 2 2 6 6 6 18

4.2 Progress Indicator #2: Percentage of Columbus

Dealerships Pledged - 30% 50% 60% 60% 80% 100% 100%

4.2 Progress Indicator #3: Percentage of OEMs Pledged

- 30% 50% 60% 60% 80% 100% 100%

4.2 Progress Indicator #4: Number of Car Salespeople

Trained TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

4.2 Progress Indicator #5: Number of Trainings Conducted

- 2 2 2 6 6 6 18

4.2 Progress Indicator #6: Number of Different Dealers

with Certified Salespersons

T 1 2 3 4 4 6 8 8

P 2

4.2 Progress Indicator #7:

Overall satisfaction rate of participating dealers

Average Likert Scale (ALS) (Very satis fied to not at a l l satis fied)

- ALS -

4.2 Progress Indicator #8: Number of negotiated group

purchase rates

- - - 2 2 2 2 6

4.2 Progress Indicator #9: Number of PEV and PHEV models eligible for group

purchase rates

TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Details

Definition/s Dealer and/or OEM pledge : TBD

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Salesperson training: TBD

Certified salesperson: TBD Negotiated group purchase rate: TBD

Baseline: Initial inventory/availability of EV vehicles, (including number and type) at end of 2016

Data:

Assumptions: Any ‘TBDs’ will be finalized as data becomes available

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

INITIATIVE 4.3: INCREASE DEMAND FOR EVs Section 2: 4.3 Strategies 4.3.1 to 4.3.5 Initiative Objective: Increase electric vehicle market adoption (percentage of new registrations

of new and used vehicles) in Columbus and the surrounding seven county region to 1.8% by the

end of the three year grant period, representing a 486% increase (~3200 vehicles) from 2015

baseline of 0.37% (Polk data).

INDICATORS

Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 Life of

Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 1

Total Initiative Indicator 4.3 See Priority Indicator 4

4.3 Progress Indicator #1:

Number of visits to EV education website

- TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

4.3 Progress Indicator #2: Number of Visits to Consumer

Education Showroom - - - TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

4.3 Progress Indicator #3:

Significant Events at the Showroom - - - TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

4.3 Progress Indicator #4: Number of Workplace Company

Commitments/Pledges ---------------------------------------

Baseline: 2 Companies pledged prior to Apr 2017

T 3 10 10 7 30 50 20 100

P 4

4.3 Progress Indicator #5: Number of Ride and Drive Events

Conducted - 10 10 10 30 50 50 130

4.3 Progress Indicator #6: Number of test drives conducted at

the Ride and Drive Events - 1000 1000 1000 3000 5000 5000 13000

4.3 Progress Indicator #7: Attendance at Ride and Drive Events

- TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

4.3 Progress Indicator #8: Number of Executive Vehicle

Purchases ---------------------------------------

Baseline: 2 Executive vehicles purchased prior to Apr 2017

T 4 2 2 2 10 20 20 50

P 5

4.3 Progress Indicator #8: Number of Executive Vehicle

Purchases 4 2 2 2 10 20 20 50

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

4.3.1. Strategy: EV Awareness Campaign (Section 2: 4.3.1)

Description: This strategy will establish a user-friendly, web-based resource that includes the following: a portal for an on-going feedback loop, reporting interface, templates and tools for program execution, educational material, and community building across participating companies. The strategy also includes: The development and execution of an active marketing and PR campaign around consumer adoption of electric vehicles; and generate media, recognition and PR attention for companies around their commitments and successes.

4.3.2. Strategy: Consumer Education Showroom (Section 2: 4.3.2)

Description: A brand agnostic EV consumer education showroom will be established creating a consumer-oriented destination to learn about electric vehicles. The goal is to have the showroom in full operation by year 2 and attendance goals will be set by that time.

4.3.3. Strategy: Workplace Electric Vehicle Adoption Campaign (Section 2: 4.3.3)

Description: A companywide commitment will be secured from at least 100 employers to substantially engage in Smart Columbus’ electrification plan by the end of year two of the grant period.

4.3.4. Strategy: Ride and Drive Roadshow (Section 2: 4.3.4)

Description: 120 Smart Columbus Ride and Drive events will be executed at corporate campuses and select public venues during the grant period. The Ride and Drive events will include approximately 24,000 EV test drives and educate more than 200,000 residents about Smart Columbus and electric vehicle technology.

4.3.5. Strategy: Executive Vehicle Purchase (Section 2: 4.3.5)

Description: At least 50 community leaders (CEO or C-Suite executives) will be recruited to buy a PEV or PHEV to set the pace for adoption among their workforce by the end of the program.

4.3. Progress Indicators

Targets See table above

#1 - Goal and targets depend on marketing campaign strategy and timeline of website development

Details

Definition/s:

Consumer Education Showroom: Significant Event at Showroom:

Workplace Company Commitment/Pledge : Ride and Drive :

Executive Vehicle Purchase: Data:

Method:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

7.0 Priority 5 – Charging Infrastructure

Priority Objective: Support the acceleration of electric vehicle adoption with charging infrastructure,

with the goal of 1,685 new charging ports by the end of 2019, including a minimum

of 25 fast charging stations and 1580 Level 2 ports. The remaining 80 ports at this

time are intended to be Level 1.

Priority Indicator: Number of level 1, 2, and 3 electric charging ports available to the public

INDICATO RS 2017

2018 2019 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority Indicator: Charging Station Ports

20 L1 0 L2 0 DC

5 L1 0 L2 0 DC

5 L1 0 L2 0 DC

20 L1 100 L2

5 DC Fast

50 L1 100 L2 5 DC Fast

23 L1 1,255

L2 20 DC Fast

7 L1 225 L2

0 DC Fast

80 L1 1,580 L2 25 DC Fast

Priority Target: See above chart,

1,685 charging station ports: 300 public agency (fleet), 50 workplace

(employee) and 30 multi-unit dwellings, 30 public accessible, 1275 Data: Number, type, and location of chargers

Area: Seven county metropolitan region

Temporal: Reported quarterly

Baseline: Existing inventory of publically available charging as of Dec 31, 2016

Progress Tracking:

INDICATO RS 2017

2018 2019 Life of Project Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

Priority Indicator: Charging Station Ports

21 L1 0 L2 0 DC

INITIATIVE 5.1: MULTI-UNIT DWELLING (MUD) Initiative Objective: PMO will install 30 charging stations at multi-unit dwellings (MUDs) and

AEP will install 1,000 residential charging stations (pending PUCO approval) in the life of the

project to support EV adoption.

5.1. Overall Initiative Indicator/s Initiative Indictor/s:

Total number of Level 1 MUD charging stations Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

T 0 0 0 15 15 8 7

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

P - - - - -

Details Definition/s:

Data:

Method:

5.1.1 Strategy: Develop MUD Infrastructure Plan (Section 2: 5.1.1)

Progress Indictor/s: #1 Number of MUD developers contacted to install EV Charging infrastructure

#2 Number of MUD developers signed pledge form to install EV Charging infrastructure Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 10 10 5 0 0 15 0 0

#2 31 0 3 0 6 0 0 Progress

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 10 5 #2 01

Details

Definition/s: MUD Contact : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

MUD Pledge : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group] Data:

Method:

Notes:

1 Pledge form was replaced with rebate application

5.1.2 Strategy: Residential Charging Research and Assessment (Section 2: 5.1.2)

Progress Indictor/s: Number of Level 2 residential charging ports

Target/s:

CY2017 - 0, CY2018 – 1000, CY2019 – 0 Details

Definition/s: Level 2 : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Data:

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Method:

INITIATIVE 5.2: PUBLIC ACCESS CHARGING Initiative Objective: In the life of the project, the PMO and Columbus Division of Power will

work with American Electric Power to install EV charging that will be accessible to the public.

280 Level II and 25 DC Fast charging stations will be installed in priority locations.

5.2. Public Charging

Initiative Indictor/s:

1 Number of Level 2 publically accessible charging station ports – City of Columbus 2 Number of Level 2 publically accessible charging station ports – AEP

3 Number of Level 3 (DC Fast Charge) publically accessible charging station ports Targets

#1 CY2017 - 0, CY2018 – 30, CY2019 – TBD (12/31/2018) #2 CY2017 - 0 , CY2018 – 125, CY2019 – 125

#3 CY2017 - Q1-0, Q2-0, Q3-0, Q4-5 Total 5 , CY2018 – 20, CY2019 – 0

Targets Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 LOP

(30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total #1 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 TBD

#2 0 0 0 0 0 125 125 #3 0 0 0 5 5 20 0

Progress Toward Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 2 51 #2 0

#3 0 Details

Definition/s:

Level 2 : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group] Level 3 (DC Fast Charge) : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Data: Method:

Notes:

1 Installed in city garage

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

5.2. Public Charging – Cont. Progress Indicators

Progress Indictor/s: #1 Number of meetings with potential site hosts

#2 Number of partnerships with site hosts and secure commitments

Targets #1 CY2017 - Q1-5, Q2-10, Q3-0, Q4-0 Total 15,

CY2018 – TBD [12/31/2017], CY2019 – TBD [12/31/2018]

#2 CY2017 - Q1-0, Q2-0, Q3-3, Q4-3 Total 6 , CY2018 – TBD [12/31/2017], CY2019 – TBD [12/31/2018]

Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 5 10 0 0 15 TDB(12/2017) TBD(12/2018) #2 0 0 3 3 6 TDB(12/2017) TBD(12/2018)

Progress Towards Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 3 #2 0

Details Definition/s:

Site host meeting : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group] Site host commitment : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Data:

Method:

INITIATIVE 5.3: WORKPLACE CHARGING

Initiative Objective: The Consumer Adoption workgroup, with guidance from PMO, will assist

Columbus businesses in developing workplace charging within the life of the grant.

5.3. Workplace Charging

Initiative Indictor/s: Number of workplace charging stations

Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 20 5 5 5 35 15 TBD(12/2018) Progress Towards Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 LOP

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total (30 yr)

#1 39 201 Details

Definition/s:

Workplace charging station : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Data:

Method:

Notes: 1 Added by AEP in Q1

5.3. Workplace Charging – Cont. Progress Indicators

Progress Indictor/s: #1 Development of city workplace charging policy 1

#2 Meetings with employers to consider workplace charging #3 Number of partner employers signed pledge form to install EV Charging infrastructure

Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 0% 30% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% #2 0 5 10 10 25 TBD(12/2017) TBD(12/2018)

#3 0 0 3 5 8 5 TBD(12/2018) Progress Towards Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 0% 0%1

#2 0 ? #3 0 0

Details Definition/s:

Workplace charging policy : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Employer meeting : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group] Employer pledge : [To be defined by Charging Infrastructure working group]

Data: Method:

Notes:

1 Development of the city’s workplace charging policy was moved to the policy group

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

INITIATIVE 5.4: FLEET CHARGING STATIONS

Initiative Objective: The City of Columbus will deploy charging stations in support of their EV

fleet conversion detailed in Priority 2, Initiative 2.1: Public Fleets. Columbus will design and

install 100 charging ports by the end of 2017, and 100 more by the end of the project. The PMO

will work with other public agencies to install the additional 100 charging stations for their

fleets by the end of the project. Private companies will install charging stations to support their

own fleets as they are procured and deployed. The PMO will track privately installed fleet

charging stations.

5.4. Workplace Charging Initiative Indictor/s:

Number of level 2 charging station ports for Columbus fleet

Targets Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 LOP

(30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total #1 6 0 0 0 100 100 100 100

Progress Towards Targets Year 1

Year 2 Year 3 LOP

(30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 6 0 Details

Definition/s: Data:

Method:

INITIATIVE 5.5: BUILDING AND ZONING CHANGES TO SUPPORT EV CHARGING Initiative Objective: The Charging Stations Work Group will create recommended changes to

the City Code and processes to make EV infrastructure permitting more efficient. This is an

ongoing process that will be completed by the end of year one. Three sites will be submitted for

permit by the end of first quarter of the project.

5.5. Building and Zoning Changes to support EV charging

Progress Indictor/s:

Site plan test cases submitted for permit Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 LOP

Foundation Quarterly Report | Q2 2017

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total (30 yr)

#1 0 3 0 0 0 3 TBD(12/2017) TBD(12/2018) Progress Towards Targets

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

LOP (30 yr) Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

#1 0 11

Details Definition/s:

Data: Method:

Notes: 1 Site plan for AEP

Evaluating the effectiveness of Electric Vehicle adoption for reduction of GHG

Each electric vehicle (EV) adopted in the Smart Columbus Program (SCP), whether pure battery electric vehicle (BEV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV), will displace an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The benefit in terms of reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for each displaced ICE vehicle is dependent on a number of factors including the efficiency of the EV, the utilization of the vehicle in terms of miles driven, and the upstream factors that contribute to the carbonization of the electrical supply used for recharging. The SCP will assess the GHG reduction resulting from EV adoption using scientific yet simple and straight forward methodologies as demonstrated and documented through the US Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE through the office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) provides data and a number of tools to support the GHG performance measure reporting as well as various resources for alternative fuel vehicle adoption for cities through their Clean Cities program. Furthermore, the DOE, through the EERE office, has signed a memorandum of understanding with the US Department of Transportation in support of the Smart Cities program. The methodology used to assess GHG reduction will consist of assessing the number and type of EVs adopted through the SCP, the efficiency of each EV model adopted, the extent of utilization of vehicles within the Columbus area, the average fuel efficiency and utilization of displaced ICE vehicles, and the upstream factors related to carbonization of the grid. This general method is applicable to EVs put into service in public fleets, private fleets, service fleets, or by the general consumer. To estimate mobile source emissions resulting from an EV replacing a conventionally fueled vehicle, the DOE, through the Argonne National Laboratory, provides the Alternative Fuel Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Transportation (AFLEET) Tool (https://greet.es.anl.gov/afleet). AFLEET takes into account all of these factors. The base case results of this Excel-based spreadsheet model allows the city to calculate and compare the current annual GHG emissions as well as air pollutant emissions from alternative fuel and conventional vehicles. Tailoring AFLEET to Columbus’ needs requires information on present and future decarbonization of the

local grid. Reasonably current carbon intensity estimates of the local grid are available through another DOE tool called GREET which provides regional emissions of fossil -based power generation within various regional aggregations of the United States. These aggregation levels include state, Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) subregion, and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) levels. GREET (Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions and Energy Use in Transportation) was developed over 20 years ago. GREET provides a fuel -cycle model to generate the necessary wells-to-wheels petroleum use and GHG emissions for multiple fuel production pathways and vehicle types. It is updated annually. To understand vehicle lifetime emissions benefits, estimates from GREET can be further refined with the electric generation mix from the local utility company as they implement additional renewable energy sources, as the mix of fossil fuel generators changes, and in response to different charging profiles encouraged by the Smart Columbus Program.

Vehicle utilization measured in annual miles driven for average consumer vehicle utilization is available through national and state survey data. Aggregate average fuel economy of the existing ICE fleet is estimated based on the existing fleet composition revealed from vehicle registration records and the fuel economy rating from each vehicle model (available from fueleconomy.gov ). Vehicle registration data is available either directly from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles or from data aggregators such as R. L. Polk. Utilization from fleet service of any type is typically available directly from the fleet managers in terms of miles driven on a quarterly or yearly basis. Examples using this methodology are provided through the Alternative Fuels Data Center’s (AFDC) Emissions from Hybrids and PEVs page (http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_emissions.php). This site provides a representative breakdown of electricity sources and current annual emissions per vehicle type by geographic location as well as national averages. As an example, the current annual emissions per vehicle in Ohio are included below. The data sources and methodology used to calculate the emissions, fuel use, and electricity sources for conventional and electric drive vehicles on this page are consistent with data and methodology that will be employed by SCP, and available through DOE tools such as AFLEET and GREET. Whereas sample calculations are provided for large geographic regions (such as Ohio statewide in the table below), the GHG performance measures for the SCP program will be tailored to the jurisdictional and geographic areas impacted by the program, and will also take into account anticipated changes in the mix of generators serving plug-in vehicles as a result of the anticipated evolution of the generation mix and charging patterns of the vehicles.

Current Annual Emissions per Vehicle in Ohio

(pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent per year)

Gasoline

Vehicle

Gasoline Hybrid

Electric Vehicle

Gasoline Plugin Hybrid

Electric Vehicle* (PHEV33)

Battery Electric

Vehicle

11,435 6,258 7,688 6,958

* based on 33 mile electric vehicle range

Data Requirements to Perform a GHG using AFLEET Tool

The AFLEET Tool provides default data for both ICE vehicles and BEVs including: annual vehicle mileage,

fuel economy, and grid mix by NERC region. However, Columbus should update values using vehicle

fleet and utility data to more accurately calculate GHG emissions. Public and private fleets may collect

annual vehicle mileage and fuel economy through the use of fleet management software. In that case,

the data can be easily aggregated by vehicle type and entered into AFLEET (Table 2).

Table 2 - AFLEET Key Vehicle Inputs

For ride-share and personal vehicles, this information may not be easily accessible. AFLEET has national

average mileage (Table 3) and fuel economy (Table 4) data, though more detailed estimates looking at

regional driving patterns of both ride-share and personal vehicle drivers could refine the analysis.

Table 3 - AFLEET Default Average Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled

Table 4 - AFLEET Default Fuel Economy (Miles per Gasoline Gallon Equivalent)

The grid mix is another key input that will be necessary to enter for GHG analysis. AFLEET allows the

Light-Duty Vehicle InformationVehicle Type Passenger Car

Light-Duty Fuel Type

Number of Light-Duty

Vehicles

Annual

Vehicle

Mileage

Fuel Economy

(MPGGE)

Gasoline 0 12,400 28.8

Gasoline Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) 0 12,400 40.3

Gasoline Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) 0 12,400 42.9

Gasoline Extended Range Electric Vehicle (EREV) 0 12,400 41.2

All-Electric Vehicle (EV) 0 12,400 95.0

Medium-Duty Pickup Truck 24,000

Utility Cargo Van 27,000

Shuttle/Paratransit Van 65,000

Light-Duty Pickup Truck 11,400

SUV 13,000

SUV - Taxi 65,000

Car 12,400

Car - Taxi 65,000

Car - Police 20,000

Vocation Type Gasoline

All-Electric

Vehicle (EV)

Medium-Duty Pickup Truck 13.0 42.9

Utility Cargo Van 10.0 33.0

Shuttle/Paratransit Van 14.5 47.9

Light-Duty Pickup Truck 22.7 74.9

SUV 26.8 88.4

SUV - Taxi 26.8 88.4

Car 28.8 95.0

Car - Taxi 28.8 95.0

Car - Police 28.8 95.0

user to select pre-loaded generation mixes for the national average and each NERC region (Figure 1).

Columbus can enter eGrid subregion data or future utility projections, custom generation mixes are

easily entered (Table 5).

Figure 1 – AFLEET Electricity Input

Table 5 - AFLEET Default Electricity Generation Mix

U.S. Average Mix Reliability First Corporation (RFC)

User Mix

Residual oil 0.6% 0.2% 0.6%

Natural gas 26.2% 15.9% 26.2%

Coal 40.6% 51.3% 40.6%

Nuclear power 19.9% 28.3% 19.9%

Biomass 0.3% 0.1% 0.3%

Others (Wind, Solar, Hydro, etc) 12.4% 4.1% 12.4%

After entering those key inputs, AFLEET calculates annual GHG emissions, among other factors such as

petroleum use and air pollution (Table 6).

Source of Electricity for PHEVs, EVs, and FCVs (Electrolysis)

1 - Average U.S. Mix 7

2 to 11 - EIA Region Mix (see map)

12 - User Defined (go to 'Background Data' sheet)

Table 6 - AFLEET Sample Annual GHG Results

Customization to Columbus Smart City Electrification Program

With respect to the priorities and initiatives within the Smart City Electrification Plan (SCEP), the

tools and methodology described above will be applied to estimate the GHG benefits resulting

from EV adoption either from fleets or consumers. The availability of data needed to estimate

the associated benefits will vary by program. An overview of the data inputs specific to the

SCEP is provided in Table 7 below.

Grid composition will be customized based on sub-region and electric provider (AEP or

Columbus Division of Power).

Gasoline DieselGasoline

HEVGasoline

PHEVGasoline

EREVEV G.H2 FCV B20 B100 E85 LPG CNG

Petroleum Use 9 0

GHG Emissions 5 3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Pet

role

um

Use

(b

arre

ls)

or

GH

Gs

(sh

ort

to

ns)

Table 7 - SCEP data requirement for EV adoption

LED Streetlight Conversion – GHG Calculation Methodology Baseline

Estimate the nameplate/rated power (Watts) of each existing luminaires.

Daily hours of usage.

Assumptions

As 2015, there are approximately 52,000 existing street lights that the Division of Power is responsible for maintaining. This represents approximately 65% of the city’s streets.

Emission Reduction1 Calculate the gross electricity savings by comparing the total average power of the project

luminaires multiplied by project annual hours of operation, with the average power of the

Fleets Desired Minimum

Public Actual per vehicle VMT per

quarter by vehicle model,

including ratio of gasoline versus

BEV for any PHEV vehicles

Number of vehicle by type (BEV

and PHEV) and average vehicle

use per vehicle class (light-duty

sedan, SUV, etc.) based on fleet

history estimated on a quarterly

basis. Percent use of ICE for

PHEVs estimated based on

national or regional averages.

Private Actual per vehicle VMT per

quarter by vehicle model,

including ratio of gasoline versus

BEV for any PHEV vehicles

Number of vehicles by type (BEV

and PHEV) and average vehicle

use per vehicle class (light-duty

sedan, SUV, etc.) based on fleet

history estimated on a quarterly

basis. Percent use of ICE for

PHEVs estimated based on

national or regional averages.

Service Actual per vehicle VMT per

quarter by vehicle model,

including ratio of gasoline versus

BEV for any PHEV vehicles

Number of vehicles and type

(BEV vs PHEV) and average

vehicle use based on actual fleet

history estimated on a quarterly

basis. Percent use of ICE for

PHEVs estimated based on

national or regional averages.

Consumer Adoption Number of vehicles registered as

revealed by Polk quarterly

reports by type (EV, PHEV). User

reported annual VMT.

Number of vehicles registered as

revealed by Polk quarterly

reports by type (EV, PHEV).

Regional averages for vehicle

mileage.

Vehicle Utilization

baseline luminaires multiplied by baseline annual hours of operation (daily hours times 365 or other number equal to the number of days per year that the lights are expected to be operated);

Calculate the net electricity saving (NES) by correcting the gross electricity savings for any leakage and transmission & distribution losses.

Once the project is installed, the electricity saved by the project activity in year y is calculated as follows:

𝑁𝐸𝑆𝑦 =∑𝐸𝑆𝑖,𝑦×1

(1− 𝑇𝐷𝑦)

𝑛

𝑖=1

Equation (1)

Where: 𝐸𝑆𝑖,𝑦 = (𝑄𝑖,𝐵𝐿 × 𝑃𝑖,𝐵𝐿 ×𝑂𝑖 ,𝐵𝐿 × (1− 𝑆𝑂𝐹𝑖,𝐵𝐿))

− (𝑄𝑖,𝑃 ×𝑃𝑖,𝑃,𝑦 × 𝑂𝑖,𝑦 ×(1 − 𝑆𝑂𝐹𝑖,𝑦))

Equation (2)

𝑆𝑂𝐹𝑖,𝐵𝐿 = 𝐴𝐹𝑅𝑖,𝐵𝐿 × 𝑂𝐹𝑖,𝐵𝐿 Equation (3)

𝑆𝑂𝐹𝑖,𝑦 = 𝐴𝐹𝑅𝑖,𝑦 ×𝑂𝐹𝑖 ,𝑦 Equation (4)

Where:

𝑁𝐸𝑆𝑦 = Net electricity saved in year y (kWh)

𝐸𝑆𝑖,𝑦 = Estimated annual electricity savings for equipment of type i, for the relevant type of project equipment in year y (kWh)

𝑦 = Crediting year counter

𝑖 = Counter for luminaire type

𝑛 = Number of luminaires

1 Calculation based on the Clean Development Mechanism Demand-Side Activities for efficient outdoor and street lighting technologies methodology

Section 5: GREEN POWER MARKETING PLAN

COLUMBUS DIVISION OF POWER GREEN POWER MARKETING PLAN OVERVIEW

The Division of Power will raise the green energy portfolio from 50,760MWh which amounts to 5.7% of

their total power sold as of 2016 to 28.4% by the end of the grant period and to 29% by 2022. It is

estimated that between 2017 and 2022 a minimum of 1.2 million MWh of new green energy will be

consumed through the Columbus Division of Power.

The Columbus Division of Power purchases on average 885,000 MWh of power each year to serve

approximately 13,000 customers and the street light system throughout the city. The division is

committed to reducing its GHG emissions and diversifying its total energy mix through three (3) green

power purchasing programs:

GREEN POWER PROGRAMS

Program #1: 8,760MWh of the 50,760 MWh green energy purchased in 2016 is sourced from Central

Ohio Bio-Energy (COBE) and Quasar Energy Group, which develops biomass waste-to-energy technology

utilizing anaerobic digestion. The Columbus Division of Power is committed to continuing this green

power purchase annually at a cost of $140,000 to the City.

Program #2: EcoSmart Choice Green Pricing Program option for its customers allowing them to offset up

to 100% of their electric usage. This green pricing program funds the purchase and retirement of

renewable energy certificates through American Municipal Power. The Division of Power intends to

increase participation in the program by 5% of renewable energy supplied by the end of the grant

period.

Program 3: Purchase power agreement (PPA) clause that necessitates 20% of the total power

requirements come from Green Power. Through this agreement the Columbus Division of Power will

purchase approximately 180,000 MWh of renewable energy certificates each year at an estimated cost

of $1/MWh. The City of Columbus will utilize Vulcan grant funds to cover fifty percent of the cost for

the first two years, future years will be funded 100% by the City of Columbus.

MARKETING PLAN

Build awareness of green power programs and enroll customers in EcoSmart through:

Outreach: Designing targeted materials to promote program to all existing customers

Education: Creating content and research on renewable energy

Access: Updating website and linking DOP and AMP sites

Partnership: Find with other organizations & programs to engage (Smart Columbus, Ohio

Environmental Council, GreenSpot, APPA, AMP etc.)

MARKETING ACTIVITY TIMELINE

DATE ACTIVITY

6/19/17-7/30/17 Research consumer behavior: (Target – 13,000 Existing Customers)

Industrial

Large Commercial, Small Commercial, Government/City Facilities Residential – individual, families, campus area

6/19/17-7/30/17 Research various green power topics and trends 6/19/17-7/30/17 Review other utility outreach programs 6/19/17-8/30/17 Pre-plan Social Media posts on green power (52 weeks) 6/19/17-8/30/17 Pre-write content for DOP website (at least 12 months) 6/19/17-7/30/17 Create Green Power Campaign Slogan or hashtag 6/19/17-7/30/17 Create Green Power Campaign collateral for each targeted audience 6/19/17-7/30/17 Create Green Power PowerPoint Video 6/19/17-7/30/17 Research local events to attend in the fall 7/17/17 Update DOP Website with a Green Power Section 7/17/17 Link DOP and AMP Websites 7/31/17 LAUNCH GREEN POWER CAMPAIGN

7/31/17 Issue Press Release through Smart Columbus

7/31/17 Issue info to all City communications staff and website 7/31/17 Publish PowerPoint video on EcoSmart and green programs 8/1/17-12/30/17 Post weekly to DPU Facebook, Twitter (stats, fun facts and tips) 8/1/17-12/30/17 Post monthly educational content (PowerPoint, articles, graphs) 8/7/17 Print collateral 8/7/17-12/30/17 Attend 2-3 events to promote program 9/1/17 Mail collateral to all DOP customers Ongoing Send thank you emails as new customers enroll

Ongoing Track EcoSmart enrollment and participation levels 11/13/17 Finalize DOP Green Report (annual) 12/1/17 Publish DOP Green Report