16
SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11: 9 – 38.72 m, 10 – 43.136 m, 11 – 47.552 m FEL energy 8, 13, and 18 keV LCLS-II Undulator: period 3.2 cm, each undulator magnetic section is 3.4 m, and break length is 1 m Electron bunch 4 kA peak current, 0.3 mm-mrad emittance, and 1.3 MeV slice energy spread 13 & 18 keV FEL: electron bunch temporal profile: ideal flattop 8 keV FEL: electron bunch temporal profile: start-to-end FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Simulation for TW FEL @ LCLS-II

  • Upload
    spence

  • View
    28

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Simulation for TW FEL @ LCLS-II. Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11: 9 – 38.72 m, 10 – 43.136 m, 11 – 47.552 m FEL energy 8, 13, and 18 keV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario

SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11:9 – 38.72 m, 10 – 43.136 m, 11 – 47.552 m

FEL energy 8, 13, and 18 keV

LCLS-II Undulator: period 3.2 cm, each undulator magnetic section is 3.4 m, and break length is 1 mElectron bunch

4 kA peak current, 0.3 mm-mrad emittance, and 1.3 MeV slice energy spread13 & 18 keV FEL: electron bunch temporal profile: ideal flattop 8 keV FEL: electron bunch temporal profile: start-to-end

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Page 2: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

8 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400) with 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 1.50205 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

SASE S-2-E beam, horns lase strongly

Page 3: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

8 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400): 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidth with Bragg angle 57o

The FEL centered @ 1.50205 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seed

Page 4: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

8 keV FEL through an 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 1.50205 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seeded TW: Taper profile for 5 MW seed

Page 5: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SASE FEL in the seed bandwidth: Gamma-distribution

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seeded TW

EEM

EEE

MMEp

MM

exp1)(

)(1

Page 6: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

13 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400) with 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 0.9547 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

SASE

Page 7: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

13 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400): 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidth with Bragg angle 32o

The FEL centered @ 0.9547 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seed

Page 8: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

13 keV FEL through a 1.2E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 0.9547 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seeded TW: Taper profile for 1 MW seed

Page 9: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SASE FEL in the seed bandwidth: Gamma-distribution

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seeded TW

EEM

EEE

MMEp

MM

exp1)(

)(1

Seeded TW: Taper profile for 1 MW seed

Page 10: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

18 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400) with 2.5E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 0.6898 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

SASE

Page 11: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

18 keV FEL through a single crystal 0.1 mm thick C(400): 2.5E-05 (FWHM) bandwidth with Bragg angle 23o

The FEL centered @ 0.6898 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Seed

Need be improved, but electron beam will determine

Page 12: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

Seeded TW: Taper profile for 1 MW seed

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

18 keV FEL through a 2.5E-05 (FWHM) bandwidthThe FEL centered @ 0.6898 Å

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Page 13: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SASE FEL in the seed bandwidth: Gamma-distribution

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

EEM

EEE

MMEp

MM

exp1)(

)(1

Seeded TW: Taper profile for 1 MW seed

Page 14: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

Fundamental 6 keV 3rd harmonic @ 18 keV (in progress), but let us look at 8 keV case

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

8 keV: ideal (blue)

ideal 3rd harmonic (x 30) (red)

start-to-end (green)

Page 15: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

8 vs 13, ideal vs s-2-e

8 keV: ideal (blue) start-to-end (green)

13 keV: ideal (red)

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

Page 16: Simulation for  TW FEL @ LCLS-II

SIMULATION FOR TW FEL @ LCLS-II

Summary

The next episode:Optimize for 150 m long TW undulatorAny optimization on the break length between the undulator sections

FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC), J. Wu, [email protected]

FEL power (keV)

SASEUndulator

Length (m)

TWUndulator

Length (m)

Seed power (MW)

Power @ 100 m

± rms (TW)

Power @ 150 m

± rms (TW)

Power @ 200 m

± rms (TW)

8 39 200 5 0.815 ± 0.048

1.204 ± 0.091

1.245 ± 0.097

13 43 200 1 0.395 ± 0.039

0.870 ± 0.095

1.305 ± 0.155

18 48 200 1 0.189 ± 0.002

0.495 ± 0.010

0.673 ± 0.022