Selected Works 2012

Selected WorksRoss Galloway

Selected Works2012Selected Works

Ross GallowaySelected Works 2012

[email protected] of Texas at Austin

M.Arch I Candidate301.335.2644

2

CAF Museum

Parasitic Changing Rooms

The Re-Burbia

Glover Park House

Marfa Live/Work Art Gallery

Migrant Worker/Thinker

Academic Work

40

34

28

22

6

16

4

Microsoft Mid-Atlantic

Private High School Expansion

Reston Heights East

425 Eye St.

54

48

46

58

64

Professional Work

Sketchbook: Italy

Hand Renderings

Process Work

Digital Renderings

Drawings/Sketches

Curriculum Vitae

70

68

82

74

72

78

Academic WorkUniversity of Texas M.Arch Program

Academic WorkUniversity of Texas M.Arch Program

6

CAF Air Museumwith Travis AveryFall 2010Critic - Vincent Snyder

The task of this studio was to design a museum for the Commemorative Air Force, an organization dedicated to the restoring, preserving, and, most importantly, flying of World War II aircraft. Included in their collection is the last remaining flyable B-29 bomber named Fifi.

Initial studies quickly revealed that there is a conflict between the scale needed to service, operate and fly the different aircraft in the collection (with wingspans up to 140 feet) and the need to view and experience the aircraft as a museum-goer. In order to mediate between these scales and drawing on existing airplane sheds on the site, we conceived of the museum as a large covered shed where all museum functions exist within the thickness of the roof.

By hoisting the planes up into the roof, the functional conflicts between viewing, servicing, and flying the planes

are separated, allowing all of them to be performed simultaneously with equal efficiency. The airplanes are viewed in their “natural state”: off the ground. The viewing catwalks meander sectionally and allow visitors to the museum to see the planes from all angles, above and below, creating a more intimate relationship between viewer and subject.

A series of industrial cranes and tracks allow airplanes to be positioned as needed. Fifi, the B-29 hangs at the prow of the building and can be extended out over the catwalk to allow entry to its bomb bay and cockpit.

Other program elements included are a grandstand to view air-shows, auditorium, restaurant, and offices for the museum. Important public spaces such as the auditorium and conference rooms are suspended from the superstructure similarly to how the airplanes are. Conditioned spaces are loaded toward the front of the museum, minimizing heating and cooling requirements.

The structure consists of a 2-directional steel truss system that has a free span length of 160 feet and supports a 120 foot cantilever. It touches the ground on 4 trussed steel legs.

8

structural diagram

catwalks

airplanes

program spaces

vertical circulation

ground floor

museum level

upper catwalks

10

transverse section

longitudinal section


transverse section

12

travis avery | ross galloway

austin air museumlocation| date| 09.20.2010

A3.

2 | p

artia

l bui

ldin

g se

ctio

n | 1

/4”=

1’

varieswall sections and details

A3.2

1 1/4" = 1' - 0"

ENLARGED SECTION

travis avery | ross galloway

austin air museumlocation| date| 09.20.2010

A3.

2 | p

artia

l bui

ldin

g se

ctio

n | 1

/4”=

1’

varieswall sections and details

A3.2

1 1/4" = 1' - 0"

ENLARGED SECTION

14

5.3

1

5.3

2

5.1

2

1 1" = 1'-0"

WALL SECTION2 1" = 1'-0"


ENLARGED ELEVATION

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


5.3

1

5.3

2

5.1

2

1 1" = 1'-0"



ENLARGED ELEVATION

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


wall section wall section

9 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

8 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

7 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

6 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL 3 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

4 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

5 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

TWISTING ALUMINUM SKIN ON P.TWOOD PURLINS

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANEATTACHEDTO 1/2" BLACK PLYWOOD

SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS

MEMBRANE FLASHING

FORMED METAL COPING

COUNTERFLASHING

CANT STRIP ANDP.T. WOOD BLOCKING

GRAVEL BALLAST AND WATERPROOFING LAYER OVER RIGID INSULATION

ON COMPOSITE CONCRETE DECKING

SHEAR STUD WELDED TO BEAM

TOP CHORD OF SUPERTRUSS

METAL ANGLESUPPORTING STUD WALL

TWISTING ALUMINIUM SKIN ON TRIANGULAR METAL STRUTS

PERFORATED WOOD WALL PANELS ON Z-CLIPS

INSECT SCREEN

PERFORATED WOOD CEILINGPANELS WITH TRANSLUCENT

SAILCLOTH BACKING

WATER DIVERTER

C CHANNEL HEADER

ALUMINIUM SKIN ON TRIANGULAR METAL STRUTS

SUPERTRUSS BEYOND

ALUMINUM SILL






ALTERNATING GLAZING VISION"FLUSHGLAZE" AND "VISIONVENT"

ROOFLIGHTS ON METAL STUD CURB


W12

WOOD FLOORBOARDS ON1" X 1.5" WOOD JOISTS

ON CONCRETE DECKING

W12

STEEL ANGLE

ALUMINUM SKIN ONWOOD PURLINS

GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLERAILING PICKETS WITH

S.S. CABLE HORIZONTALS

TWISTING ALUMINIUM SKIN ONP.T. WOOD PURLINS

WATER DIVERTER



STEEL ANGLE TOSUPPORT EXTERIOR WALL

ALUMINUM SKIN ON P.TWOOD PURLINS

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANEATTACHED TO 1/2" PLYWOOD

SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH RIGID INSULATION

2 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

1 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

C CHANNEL

MEMBRANE FLASHING

FORMED METAL COPING

COUNTERFLASHING





ANCHOR PLATE

STEEL ANGLE KICKER

WATER DIVERTER

STEEL MULLION

HEADER

SUSPENDED GYP. BOARD CEILING ON HAT CHANNELS

TOP CHORD OF TRUSS

STEEL MULLION

ALUMINUM FLASHING

SEALANT AND BACKER ROD

WOOD BLOCKING

CARPET ON PAD



WATER DIVERTER

ALUMINUM SKIN

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


9 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

8 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

7 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

6 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL 3 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

4 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

5 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

TWISTING ALUMINUM SKIN ON P.TWOOD PURLINS



MEMBRANE FLASHING

FORMED METAL COPING

COUNTERFLASHING





TOP CHORD OF SUPERTRUSS

METAL ANGLESUPPORTING STUD WALL

TWISTING ALUMINIUM SKIN ON TRIANGULAR METAL STRUTS


INSECT SCREEN

PERFORATED WOOD CEILINGPANELS WITH TRANSLUCENT

SAILCLOTH BACKING

WATER DIVERTER

C CHANNEL HEADER


SUPERTRUSS BEYOND

ALUMINUM SILL






ALTERNATING GLAZING VISION"FLUSHGLAZE" AND "VISIONVENT"

ROOFLIGHTS ON METAL STUD CURB


W12

WOOD FLOORBOARDS ON1" X 1.5" WOOD JOISTS

ON CONCRETE DECKING

W12

STEEL ANGLE

ALUMINUM SKIN ONWOOD PURLINS

GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLERAILING PICKETS WITH

S.S. CABLE HORIZONTALS

TWISTING ALUMINIUM SKIN ONP.T. WOOD PURLINS

WATER DIVERTER





WATERPROOFING MEMBRANEATTACHED TO 1/2" PLYWOOD

SHEATHING ON 6" METAL STUDS WITH RIGID INSULATION

2 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

1 3" = 1'-0"

DETAIL

C CHANNEL

MEMBRANE FLASHING

FORMED METAL COPING

COUNTERFLASHING





ANCHOR PLATE

STEEL ANGLE KICKER

WATER DIVERTER

STEEL MULLION

HEADER

SUSPENDED GYP. BOARD CEILING ON HAT CHANNELS

TOP CHORD OF TRUSS

STEEL MULLION

ALUMINUM FLASHING

SEALANT AND BACKER ROD

WOOD BLOCKING

CARPET ON PAD



WATER DIVERTER

ALUMINUM SKIN

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T


detail 1

detail 2

Parasitic Changing RoomsSpring 2011Critic -Coleman Coker

Shoal Creek is an often overlooked ecological system that exists directly adjacent to and within the urban fabric of Austin. As a studio, we were asked to create individual architectural interventions within or around the 1st mile of Shoal Creek before it empties into Town Lake. The program was left up to the students with the stipulation that it bring awareness to, and work within, the complex adaptive systems that exist at the intersection of City and Creek.

This project intends to correct and soften the perceived separation between the urban condition of the city and the natural condition of the creek. The site, where 4th Street crosses Shoal Creek is currently spanned by a pedestrian bridge and a decommissioned wooden railroad trestle. It is a confluence of natural and man-made systems as well as of historical and new pieces of the city. The bridges link new downtown development with Seaholm power plant, which is slated to be redeveloped.

Working in parallel to a classmate’s project which proposes turning the creek and it’s bed around the trestle into a series of park, water remediation, and energy generation spaces, this project serves as an entry pavilion from the street and houses changing rooms, a cafe, and a viewing platform for activities below.

16

In an attempt to both preserve the existing historical train trestle and minimize the impact to the creek bed, the building uses the trestle as its primary structure. Program elements are suspended from the trestle with new steel members attached to the underside of the existing deck and nestle themselves between the wooden piers. Enclosed program is housed within metal clad boxes, contrasting the texture of the trestle’s beams and columns. Circulation through the building is demarcated by the use of weathered steel, relating it to other pedestrian bridges nearby.

The top surface of the trestle is given over to a platform that serves as both a viewing platform and an extension of the public square at the end of 3rd street. When the cafe and changing rooms are open, the platform sits near the center of the trestle and can be reached from both 3rd street and from the cafe below. When the cafe and changing rooms are closed, the platform slides on the existing rails toward 3rd street, creating an extension of the existing public square while closing off the building. At the same time, a gate below closes off the cafe while maintaining a public route between 3rd street and the creek below.

Beyond a physical connection, the building attempts to contribute to the ecological systems around it. Composting toilets process and store waste which is slowly turned to safe topsoil and natural fertilizer which is used in the bioremediation and filtration gardens upstream of the trestle.

building layers

Upper Movable Platform

Existing Pedestrian Bridge

Top of Existing Trestle

Added Steel Beams

Entry Stair from 3rd Street

Existing Utility Pipe

Lower Seating Area

Movable Gate

Coffee Shop / Ice Cream Stand

Changing Rooms / Bathrooms

Trestle Supports

18

open/closed and circulation diagrams

Upper Level Plan

2’0’

1” ”2”0

4’ 8’ 16’

Exisiting Train Trestle

Exisiting Footbridge

Deck/Plaza

Lower Level Plan

2’0’

1” ”2”0

4’ 8’ 16’

Men’s Locker Room Women’s Locker Room

Cafe

Waste Treatment

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

Lower Level Plan2’0’

1”0” 2”

4’ 8’ 16’

upper level plan

lower level plan


20

entry from hike/bike trail

entry from hike/bike trail toward 3rd st.

coffee shop seating and stair to upper platform

The Re-BurbiaSpring 2010Critic -Larry Doll

Inspired by the notion that the carbon footprint of an average Manhattanite is far lower than that of most rural and suburban residents and that Manhattanites on average use the same amount of gasoline as the average american from the 1920s, this project is a study of how to increase the density of downtown Austin to higher levels while holding on to certain aspects of American life that have become ubiquitous since the proliferation of the suburban model of urbanism.

Designed into the project are a number of features that are often cited as reasons that families move to the suburbs. These are:The availability of good schoolsSafe communitiesPrivate exterior spacesInternal privacy

Given the constraints of the site, these demands are met sectionally. Half of the first 3 levels of the building are occupied by a new elementary school. It is programatically separated from the residences by wrapping it around one of two interior courtyards and allowing access only via public square. The two courtyards work to foster safe communities by creating defensible semi-private spaces that serve as forecourts to the residential project and play areas for the school. Furthermore, the residential portion of the project is subdivided with vertical public spaces that serve as both circulation and communal space. Private exterior spaces are incorporated into most unit types, taking advantage of the sectional opportunities of double story units. Double story units also provide internal privacy and the separation of public and private.

The suburban features of the project do not trump its uban nature. A public plaza, created by lifting and cantilevering part of the building, speaks to Republic Park across the street and mediates between the school, residences, and the street. The street is activated by retail spaces that face the square, and dialogue is created between the school and the community by allowing glimpses into the gym and main circulation spaces from the street.

22

Vertical “street” residential circulation zones break larger communities into smaller vertical neighborhoods

Randomized zinc panel curtain wall allows for extreme variability of solid and void where maintaining a consistent language

Steel and concrete truss support the cantilever over the public square

traditional concrete column and slab structural system is used everywhere else

Elementary school serves children of families living in the building as well as other families returning from the suburbs to downtown

Public square mediates between the street and school as well as between the street and residences

Seperate courtyards are provided for the school and residences

Retail faces Republic Square, hiding parking nestled behind and under it.

Layering

24

plaza and courtyard panorama

26

unit studies

unit cluster a

unit cluster b

unit cluster b

unit cluster aupper floor

unit cluster alower floor

2828

Glover Park HouseFall 2008Personal Project

I have a certain fascination with the townhouse typology that exist in many of the older cores of America’s eastern cities. In a society where everything new that we create comes with a built-in obsolescence, these houses have stood for centuries, often weathering abuse and neglect.

As a design exercise, I searched the neighborhood I was living in for a suitable site to design a speculative townhouse that could incorporate many of the inherently sustainable and functional elements of the type while updating it to a contemporary design language.

site amenities

building site

groceries and pharmacies

restaurants and bars

bus routes and stops

Solar gain is minimal as the broad face of the house faces north. The energy effi ciency of house is kept high by maintaining a high degree of solid area on the skin and using Zinc panels and a Prodema panel rain screen system. These materials, while possibly having a higher embodied energy due to fabrication and transportation requirements than more local “green” materials, are extremely durable and will not need to be replaced and thrown out. Ideally, this house will weather as well, or better than its older neighbors.

East Elevation North Elevation

30

The fl oor plans draw on the basic rowhouse layout type but eschew typical partition walls for an open fl oor plan in order to increase the perceived size of the house. On the fi rst level, sliding and pivoting glass doors allow ventilation and open the house up to the outside. Natural light, let in from a skylight above the stairs, penetrates through the house and fi lters down into the basement. Upstairs, bedrooms have 2 sets of windows to maximize airfl ows and daylighting, and the stairwell skylight is operable to allow heat produced throughout the house to escape as it rises.

2nd fl oor

1st fl oor

basement

green roof

zinc panels

prodema rain screen

32

view toward living room

view toward dining room

34

This project is a live/work art gallery in Marfa, Texas, in which a portion of the proceeds of sold art go toward grants and micro-loans for local residents. Its aim is to create a direct connection between the economic stimulation of Marfa’s art scene and the native residents of Marfa.

Residents would apply for loans or grants, and those chosen would get to choose, or commission, a work by one of the 2 resident artists who live and work on the site. The funds for the loan would be a portion of the revenue generated by the sale of the art.

The program only occupies a portion of the site, in line with an existing concrete ruin. The rest of the site could be sold or developed and leased to raise funds for the gallery. The program is split into 2 parts, the public gallery space and the private residence and work spaces. They are separated by a public yard and event space, and the existing concrete

structure, which could serve as either a work space or exterior display space.

The concrete structure defines a number of parameters for the buildings on the site including their maximum width as well as height. Taller elements on the site draw from the proportions of the existing tower; The gallery skylights are solid iterations of it, while the second floor of the residence is an extruded version of it. Appropriate ceiling heights are maintained by excavating into the site. This move, along with the exterior walls, serves to define and ground the project as it exists in a somewhat nondescript and flat landscape.

Materials used are simple. Stucco, concrete, and cor-ten steel. A cor-ten steel wrapper announces the public entry to the gallery space. The gallery space then opens into a rear yard that can be used for a variety of events. The cor-ten steel language of the entry reappears to create and wrap the bar and service area. There is an opportunity to project video or images onto the back wall of the gallery. Past the existing structure is the artists’ residence. It is separated into working and living spaces, both in plan and section, with a sunken private courtyard providing light to the sunken living spaces.

Marfa Live/Work Art GalleryFall 2009Critic- Russell KrepartDesign Excellence Nominee - Vertical Studio

existing site condition

Site

Route 90

Route 17

site analysis

concept diagram

Presidio County CourthouseHotel

Dining

Art/Judd

Civic

site

El Paisano Hotel

Judd Workshops

Chamberlain Building

The BlockDonald Judd’s House

Thunderbird Restaurant

Thunderbird Hotel

Dairy Queen

Marfa National Bank

Pizza Foundation

Cochineal Restaurant

Carmen’s Cafe

36

studioprivate court

kitchen mech/elecbar

event/display spaceoutdoor work space

o�ce

gallery

studioprivate court



o�ce

gallery

section C

C

second fl oor plan

studioprivate court



o�ce

gallery

studioprivate court



o�ce

gallery

Section B

section A

fi rst fl oor plan

A

B

38

gallery space

gallery entrance

artist residence/workshop

40

Migrant Worker/ThinkerFall 2009Critic- Russell Krepart

conceptual rendering

Located a on a rural site, a few miles northwest of Fort Davis, Texas, on Limpia Canyon Cattle Ranch, this project consists of housing for up to 4 migrant workers or 2 migrant families during calving season at the ranch. When migrant workers are not needed on the ranch, the buildings function as a retreat for “migrant thinkers.”

The site is defi ned by a large number of cottonwood trees, which were originally spread across the area by early American workers/settlers travelling west to secure a brighter future and fulfi ll America’s “manifest destiny”. Cottonwoods are often grouped in circular patterns that originate from where seeds fell to the ground from settler’s wagon circles.

conceptual site model

42

design studies

kit of parts diagram

The organization of the camp directly references the protective nature of these tree and wagon circles. Buildings are clustered around a central yard and the integrity of the circle is created by a combination of building and cottonwood.

The buildings themselves are simple concrete boxes that sit off the ground on a wooden deck that both creates social spaces and keeps out critters. This decking serves as a second, man-made site topography, where furniture and spatial barriers are formed through augmentation of the surface.

axonometric

fl oor plan

44

view of fi re pit

view of dining space and caretaker residence

conceptual model

The decking and buildings are sliced by vertical planes, which break up massing, separate building function, and provide privacy where required.

The camp is designed to be used similarly by both the migrant worker and the migrant thinkers.

Professional WorkPeter Gluck and Partners Architects

SmithGroup

Professional WorkPeter Gluck and Partners Architects

SmithGroup

48

ATHLETICS FACILITIESSIZE

ATHLETICS FACILITIESNEEDS / WISH LIST

Too small SufficientLOWER SCHOOL 32% 0%

MIDDLE SCHOOL Too small41% 0%

Sufficient

UPPER SCHOOL Too small38%

Larger fitness center44% 55% 50%

Regulation sized gym41% 45% 38%

Larger locker rooms38% 52% 44%

Increased spectator seating29% 48% 40%

0%Sufficient

Not enough EnoughLOWER SCHOOL 15% 3%

MIDDLE SCHOOL Not enough32% 2%

Enough

UPPER SCHOOL Not enough34%

Swimming pool6% 9% 8%

Dance /acrobatics /yoga6% 5% 4%

Squash court3% 2% 2%

Climbing wall0% 2% 2%

3%Enough

ATHLETICS FACILITIESQUANTITY

Private High School ExpansionPeter Gluck and Partners2011

Peter Gluck and Partners (PGP) won the commission to strategically plan and design the expansion and renovation of a prestigious private all-boys school location in New York City’s Upper West Side. As an intern, I was a member of the project team during the programming phase of the project as well as during a lengthy strategic planning phase that was ongoing when I left.

I worked primarily on a number of infographics presenting data collected from different constituencies in the school, including teachers, alumni, and parents. They were

designed to visualize the needs and goals of the school moving forward.

I also assisted in documenting and presenting the current conditions of the physical plant of the school, which is spread over 3 buildings that have been added over the last hundred years as the school grew.

Following the programming phase of the project, I worked on organizing and presenting numerous design options for decision makers at the school. The complexity of the existing buildings, phasing needs, and budget constraints made it very important to find a way to present the options in a simple, straight-forward manner that could be quickly understood by stakeholders without losing important information. I designed an interactive presentation that allowed PGP to easily present the layers of information necessary for that specific audience.

ATHLETICS FACILITIESSIZE

ATHLETICS FACILITIESNEEDS / WISH LIST

Too small SufficientLOWER SCHOOL 32% 0%

MIDDLE SCHOOL Too small41% 0%

Sufficient

UPPER SCHOOL Too small38%

Larger fitness center44% 55% 50%

Regulation sized gym41% 45% 38%

Larger locker rooms38% 52% 44%

Increased spectator seating29% 48% 40%

0%Sufficient

Not enough EnoughLOWER SCHOOL 15% 3%

MIDDLE SCHOOL Not enough32% 2%

Enough

UPPER SCHOOL Not enough34%

Swimming pool6% 9% 8%

Dance /acrobatics /yoga6% 5% 4%

Squash court3% 2% 2%

Climbing wall0% 2% 2%

3%Enough

ATHLETICS FACILITIESQUANTITY

INSUFFICIENT because spaces don’t allow for collaboration



50%

30% 27%

COULD BEIMPROVED

22%

COULD BEIMPROVED

COULD BEIMPROVED

35%IMPEDED

37% 44%36%SATISFACTORY

35%SATISFACTORY

32%SATISFACTORY

55% 54%

20%

12%

9%

SATISFACTORY

18% SATISFACTORY

22% SATISFACTORY

NO OPINION9%

INSUFFICIENTfor non-spatial

reasons

by a lack ofgathering space

IMPEDEDby a lack of

gathering space

IMPEDEDby a lack of

gathering space

11% INSUFFICIENT

for non-spatial reasons

INSUFFICIENTfor non-spatial

reasons

8%2% NO OPINION

2% NO OPINION

2% NO OPINION

IMPRACTICAL

14%IMPRACTICAL

14%IMPRACTICAL

...“I see it as one of the school’s strengths towards Dr. Levinson’s ideal ‘one school grades K-12’”...

...Active planning of curriculum across divisions is less important than places to discuss pedagogy and to identify those teaching dilemmas that have close analogues across the divisions”...

...Difficult because teachers are genuinely too busy to really engage in cross-divisional work--even if they know it would be beneficial”...

...It is (difficult) to do because of the four different schedules (for) LS, 5/6, 7/8, and US.... it is almost impossible to do with regularity”...

...This is not emphasized from the top down. If interdivisional collaboration is a stated goal of the school, supportive guidance and oversight is provied, AND faculty members are held accountable...the physical plant will not hinder interdivisional collaboration”...

...Time/space/interest and a model of how real collaboration works all need to be provided”...

COLLABORATION ACROSS DIVISIONS

COLLABORATION WITHIN EACH DIVISION

LOWER SCHOOL

COLLABORATION AMONGST FACULTY AND STAFF ACROSS ALL DIVISIONS:

COLLABORATION AMONGST FACULTY AND STAFF WITHIN EACH DIVISION:

MIDDLE SCHOOL UPPER SCHOOL

LOWER SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL UPPER SCHOOL

faculty survey infographics

50

COLLEGIATE SCHOOL260 West 78th Street, New York NY 10024 T 212 812 8500www.collegiateschool.org

PETER GLUCK AND PARTNERS ARCHITECTS423 West 127th Street, 6th Fl, New York NY 10027 T 212 690 4950 www.gluckpartners.com

A11- BUILDINGS SUMMARY

77TH STREET CHURCH BUILDING

W 77th STREETWEST END AVENUE

INFILL BUILDING

WEST END PLAZA

PLATTEN HALL

CAMPUS OVERVIEW

GROSS AREA

G.S.F. N.S.F. % OF GROSS S.F. % OF GROSS S.F. % OF GROSS S.F. % OF GROSS S.F. % OF GROSS

West End Plaza & Infill Building 41,639 23,105 55.5% 1.80 8,866 21.3% 6,689 16.1% 2,021 4.9% 958 2.3%

Platten Hall 75,094 42,646 56.8% 1.76 13,530 18.0% 14,181 18.9% 3,536 4.7% 1,201 1.6%

77th Street Church Building 19,835 12,675 63.9% 1.57 3,521 17.8% 2,743 13.8% 617 3.1% 279 1.4%

Total Collegiate Campus 136,568 78,436 57.4% 1.74 26,907 19.7% 22,613 16.6% 6,174 4.5% 2,438 1.8%

1.65Industry Standard School Grossing Factor

MECHANICAL AREA W.C. AREAGROSSING FACTOR

WALL/SHAFT AREA CIRCULATION AREANET AREA

GROSSING FACTOR: A multiplication factor applied to Net Area that derives Gross Area (Net Area x Grossing Factor = Gross Area)*The higher the grossing factor, the more ineffecient the building.



A2

GROSS AREA

WEST END PLAZA & INFILL BUILDING:Combined 12 Story and 6 Story BuildingsBuilding(s) Gross Area: 68,468 GSFGross Area Occupied by Collegiate: 41,639 GSF

PLATTEN HALL10 Story BuildingBuilding Gross Area: 75,094 GSFGross Area Occupied by Collegiate: 75,094 GSF

77th STREET CHURCH BUILDINGCombined 4 Story and 3 Story BuildingsBuilding(s) Gross Area: 27,120 GSFGross Area Occupied by Collegiate: 19,835 GSF

TOTAL Building(s) Gross Area: 170,682 GSFTOTAL Gross Area Occupied by Collegiate: 136,568 GSF

1- BUILDINGS SUMMARYschool buildings separated

existing conditions



A3

78,436 NSF

NET AREA

WEST END PLAZA & INFILL BUILDING:Ratio: 55.5% of GrossGrossing Factor: 1.80

PLATTEN HALL:Ratio: 56.8% of GrossGrossing Factor: 1.78

77TH STREET CHURCH BUILDING:Ratio: 63.9% of GrossGrossing Factor: 1.57

TOTAL Collegiate Net Area: 78,436 NSFRATIO: 57.4% of GrossGrossing Factor: 1.74

1- BUILDINGS SUMMARY

NOTES:Area numbers re ect existing condtions, which are not ideal.-No Air Conditioning-Inadequate Mechanical Space

COLOR KEYcirculation (gross)mechanical (gross)w.c. (gross)lower schoolmiddle schoolupper schoolscienceartmusictheater artslibrarytechnologyathleticsdining/food servicesadministrationservice

TOTAL:

12,675 NSF

42,656 NSF

23,105 NSF



A4

CIRCULATION AREA

TOTAL Collegiate Circulation Area: 22,613 SFRATIO: 16.6% of Gross

1- BUILDINGS SUMMARY

NOTES:Area numbers re ect existing circulation which is not always to code.-West End Plaza corridors are too narrow-West End Plaza stairwells are too narrow-77th St Church Building corridors are too narrow-77th St Church Building is short one means of egress and is not ADA accessible (no elevator)

WEST END PLAZA & INFILL BUILDING:

14,181 SF

77TH STREET CHURCH BUILDING:

77th Street Church Building 1 Circulation Corridor 4 963 77th Street Church Building 1 Circulation Stair 6 82 77th Street Church Building 1 Circulation Vestibule 6 130 77th Street Church Building 1 Circulation Vestibule 7 39 77th Street Church Building 2 Circulation Corridor 4 163 77th Street Church Building 2 Circulation Corridor 5 162 77th Street Church Building 2 Circulation Stair 6 190 77th Street Church Building 3 Circulation Corridor 4 147 77th Street Church Building 3 Circulation Corridor 5 152 77th Street Church Building 3 Circulation Stair 6 198 77th Street Church Building 4 Circulation Corridor 3 366 77th Street Church Building 4 Circulation Stair 6 151

22,613 SF

6,689 SF

PLATTEN HALL:

2,743 SF

gPlatten Hall C2 Circulation Stair 3 143 Platten Hall C1 Circulation Auditorium Stair 81 Platten Hall C1 Circulation Corridor 2 259 Platten Hall C1 Circulation Elevators 1,2 150 Platten Hall C1 Circulation Stair 3 287 Platten Hall C1 Circulation Stair 5 130 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Elevators 1,2 150 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Stair 3 273 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Stair 4 69 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Stair 5 97 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Vestibule 1 131 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Vestibule 4 114 Platten Hall 1 Circulation Vestibule 5 34 Platten Hall 2 Circulation Corridor 2 383 Platten Hall 2 Circulation Corridor 3 144 Platten Hall 2 Circulation Elevators 1,2 150 Platten Hall 2 Circulation Stair 3 297 Platten Hall 2 Circulation Stair 4 382 Platten Hall 3 Circulation Elevators 1,2 152 Platten Hall 3 Circulation Stair 3 305 Platten Hall 3 Circulation Stair 4 225 Platten Hall 4 Circulation Elevators 1,2 151 Platten Hall 4 Circulation Stair 3 284 Platten Hall 4 Circulation Stair 4 226 Platten Hall 5 Circulation Corridor 2 929 Platten Hall 5 Circulation Elevators 1,2 152 Platten Hall 5 Circulation Stair 3 299 Platten Hall 5 Circulation Stair 4 226 Platten Hall 6 Circulation Corridor 2 929 Platten Hall 6 Circulation Elevator 1,2 152 Platten Hall 6 Circulation Stair 3 299 Platten Hall 6 Circulation Stair 4 227 Platten Hall 7 Circulation Corridor 3 297 Platten Hall 7 Circulation Elevator 1,2 151 Platten Hall 7 Circulation Stair 3 290 Platten Hall 7 Circulation Stair 4 229 Platten Hall 8 Circulation Corridor 2 782 Platten Hall 8 Circulation Elevators 1,2 152 Platten Hall 8 Circulation Stair 3 304 Platten Hall 8 Circulation Stair 4 227 Platten Hall 9 Circulation Elevators 1,2 152 Platten Hall 9 Circulation Stair 3 299 Platten Hall 9 Circulation Stair 4 227 Platten Hall 10 Circulation Corridor 2 632 Platten Hall 10 Circulation Elevators 1,2 151 Platten Hall 10 Circulation Stair 3 287 Platten Hall 10 Circulation Stair 4 227 Platten Hall 11 Circulation Corridor 2 196 Platten Hall 11 Circulation Corridor 3 70 Platten Hall 11 Circulation Elevators 1,2 144 Platten Hall 11 Circulation Stair 3 299 Platten Hall 11 Circulation Stair 4 235

BUILDING FLOOR CATEGORY ROOM NAME ROOM# AREA (NSF)

West End Plaza, Infill C1 Circulation Corridor 1 1,015 West End Plaza, Infill C1 Circulation Corridor 3 43 West End Plaza, Infill C1 Circulation Freight Elevator 2 72 West End Plaza, Infill C1 Circulation Stair 1 45 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Corridor 2 78 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Corridor 3 102 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Freight Elevator 2 72 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Stair 1 155 West End Plaza, Infill 1 Circulation Vestibule and Stair 118 West End Plaza, Infill 2 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 2 Circulation Freight Elevator 2 72 West End Plaza, Infill 2 Circulation Stair 1 130 West End Plaza, Infill 2 Circulation Stair 2A, Corridor 1 288 West End Plaza, Infill 3 Circulation Corridor 1 753 West End Plaza, Infill 3 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 3 Circulation Freight Elevator 2 69 West End Plaza, Infill 3 Circulation Stair 1 139 West End Plaza, Infill 4 Circulation Corridor 1 566 West End Plaza, Infill 4 Circulation Corridor 2 234 West End Plaza, Infill 4 Circulation Corridor 3 120 West End Plaza, Infill 4 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 4 Circulation Stair 1 147 West End Plaza, Infill 5 Circulation Corridor 1 566 West End Plaza, Infill 5 Circulation Corridor 3 174 West End Plaza, Infill 5 Circulation Corridor 4 153 West End Plaza, Infill 5 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 5 Circulation Stair 1 149 149 West End Plaza, Infill 6 Circulation Corridor 1 697 West End Plaza, Infill 6 Circulation Corridor 3 171 West End Plaza, Infill 6 Circulation Elevator 3 35 West End Plaza, Infill 6 Circulation Stair 1 146

TOTAL:

*See Page 22 for complete index of Collegiate spaces

circulation spaces

existing program spaces

52

THE OPTIONS1 2 3 4 5 6

EXISTING INFRASTRUCTUREUPGRADE

RELOCATEUPPERSCHOOL

CONNECTWEPTOPH

EXPANDANDOPTIMIZEPROGRAM

SCHOOL TOWERW/WECC

OFF SITENEWCONSTRUCTION

SIZE/EFFICIENCY 137,000 gsf 79,000nsf 1.73 grossingfactor 0% new

142,500 gsf 84,500nsf 1.69 grossingfactor 16% new




161,000 gsf103,500nsf 1.56 grossingfactor 100% new

DESCRIPTION UpgradeinfrastructureonlyNochangeto:• program• space• size

• RenovateWEP7-12• Minimumtorelocateupperschool

• RenovateWEP7-12• 7storyadditiontoInfillBuilding

• New2storyAlleyBuildingtoenlargelobby,cafeteria

• New14storyAlleyBuilding• 7storyadditiontoInfillBuilding

• RenovateWEPfloors0-12• SelectinterventionsinPH

• New12storybuildingonsiteofAlumniGym

• New2storyAlleyBuilding• WEPfloors0-12remainas-is• SelectinterventionsinPH

• New10StoryBuildingonnewsitenear61stStreetandWestEndAve

QUALITY OF SPACE

• Noimprovementexceptairconditioningandcosmeticupgrades

• UpperSchoolaccommodatedinWEP

• Improvedentryanddining• Improvedconnections

• WEPallnewandenlarged• Centralcoreunifiesbldgs• Newcafeteria

• Newtower• WEPfloors1-6mostlyunchanged

• Allnew• Lostconnectiontoschoolhistory

PROGRAM • Nochange • Nochange • Minorimprovementtosizeandadjacencies

• NochangeinWEPfloors0-6

• Improvedsizeandadjacencies

• StilldoesnotaddressissueswithGymandAuditorium

• Improvedsizeandadjacencies

• StilldoesnotaddressissueswithGymandAuditorium

• Idealadjacencies• Improvedsize• FullsizeGymandAuditorium

DISRUPTION/CONSTRUCTION RISK

• Minimumschoolsessiondisruption.

• 3-4aggressivesummers

• Minorschoolsessiondisruption

• 3-4aggressivesummers• 2yearsforWEPrenovation


• 2aggressivesummers• 2yearsofconstruction

• SchooltobeconfinedtoPlattenHallfor2years

• 3aggressivesummers• 2yearsforWEPrenovation


• 3-4aggressivesummers• 2yearsforconstruction

• Nodisruption

NEGOTIATION WITH WECC

• Requiresrenegotiationofupperschoolbuildinglease

• 0yearstooccupancy

• Utilities• 3yearstooccupancy

• Utilities• Taxlotconsolidation• 4yearstooccupancy

• RequirespurchaseofFARfromWECC


• RequiresnegotiationtobuildonWECCland


• None• 3yearstooccupancy

REGULATORY RISK • None • Minimal • WEPsubjecttoLPCreview• Minoregressissues• Lotcoverageissues

• WEPsubjecttoLPCreview• Minoregressissues• Lotcoverageissues

• AlterationtoWECC• Sharedegressissues• Non-conforming

• ValueoflandbasedonabilitytodemolishPlattenHall

COST incl.deal

bangforyourbuck

$44.5 million

-

$60 million

$1,672/nsf

$80 million

$1,577/nsf

$106 million

$1,351/nsf

$111 million

$1,732/nsf

$101 million

$976/nsf

InfrastructuralUpgradeGutRenovationNewConstruction

QUALITY OF SPACE1 2 3 4 5 6

EXISTING INFRASTRUCTUREUPGRADE

RELOCATEUPPERSCHOOL

CONNECTWEPTOPH

EXPANDANDOPTIMIZEPROGRAM

SCHOOL TOWERW/WECC

OFF SITENEWCONSTRUCTION

%NEW(includesrenovation)

CLASSROOMS

FACULTY OFFICES

PHYS. ED

DINING

DOES SCHEME UNIFY BUILDINGS?

ENTRANCE 78th Street (nochange) 78th Street (nochange) 78th Street (enlarged) WestEndAvenue(new) WestEndAvenue(new) FreedomPlaceSouthbetweenW61st&62nd

CIRCULATION/CORE

ideal ideal idealideal

ideal

ideal 35 total

8ideal25 undersized

4 compromisedbycolumns

3 compromisedproportions

34 total

4ideal28 undersized

4 compromisedbycolumns

3 compromisedproportions

45 total19ideal15 undersized8 compromisedbycolumns2 compromisedproportions



44 total 7ideal30 undersized 6 compromisedbycolumns12 compromisedproportions

officensf/facultymember

IndustryStandard50-75

BrearleyExpansion66

46 officensf/facultymember 69 officensf/facultymember 76 officensf/facultymember 61 officensf/facultymember 66 officensf/facultymember

2separatecores2separatecores 2separatecores 1unifiedcore 1compromisedcore 1unifiedcore

52% NEW85,859newgsf165,520totalgsf



0% NEW0newgsf137,061totalgsf

NO

• NohorizontalconnectionbetweenupperWEP&PH

• Long,inconvenientcommuteforUS

2undersizedgyms#ofspectators#teachingspaces

2undersizedgyms#ofspectators6teachingspaces

#ofseats#ofservinglines


SOME IMPROVEMENT

• HorizontalconnectionbetweenupperWEP&PH

• MisalignedWEP&PHfloorsrequireindirectcirculation



IMPROVED

• Improvedhorizontalconnectionsthroughoutbuilding

• Newcoreaddressesfloormisalignment



IMPROVED

• TowerexpandsexistingPHfloorplates

• NoimprovementtohorizontalconnectionsbetweenWEP&PH



YES

Competitionsizegym

#ofspectators8teachingspaces



40 officensf/facultymember

NO

• Nochangetoexisting

• Long,inconvenientcommuteforUS


Presentation slidesclicking specifi c boxes take you to slides with detailed information by project, as seen on right.

ANALYSIS OF HARD COSTSConnectWEPtoPH

Breakouts:StructuralModification $3.2M

Phasing $1.7M

Overtime $1.3M

Contingencies $11.9M

InfrastructureUpgradesOnly

Renovationw/InfrastructureUpgrades

New

AllNumbersshownareunion,nonunionnumbers20%-25%less.SeeGorton&Partnersdocumentforallbackup.

$4.8M10.961sf

$434sf

$20.1M

34,831sf

$577/sf

$6.9M

32,979sf

$210/sf

$12.7M

18,120sf

$701/sf

$18.6M

64,434sf

$289/sf

PLATTEN HALL75,395gsf

WEST END PLAZA(INCL ALLEY & INFILL)

85,930gsf

18,120sf34,831sf

32,979sf

85,930sf

$12.7M$20.1M

$6.9M

$39.7M

$701/sf$577/sf

$210/sf

$462/sf

21%

41%

38%

WESTENDPLAZA(INCLALLEY&INFILL)85,930gsfNewReno.w/Infra.Upgrades

Infra.UpgradesOnly

SUBTOTAL

Renovation$7.3MInfra.Upgrades$12.8M

-10,961sf

64,434sf

75,395sf

-$4.8M

$18.6M

$23.4M

-$434/sf

$289/sf

$310/sf

0%

15%

85%

PLATTENHALL75,395gsfNewReno.w/Infra.Upgrades

Infra.UpgradesOnly

SUBTOTAL

Renovation$1.6MInfra.Upgrades$3.2M

18,120sf45,792sf

97,413sf

161,325sf

$12.7M$24.9M

$25.5M

$.8M

$63.8M

$701/sf$577/sf

$262/sf

$395/sf

11%

28%

61%

TOTALS161,325gsfNewReno.w/Infra.Upgrades

Infra.UpgradesOnly

TOTAL

Renovation$8.9MInfra.Upgrades$16M

Pre-ConstructionCosts

PROGRAM AREA COMPARISON

Administration

Dining

Athletics

Library

Specials

Science

UpperSchool

MiddleSchool

LowerSchool

EXISTING

9,608

5,758

15,553

4,354

14,224

6,003

7,607

7,661

8,290

TOTAL 79,058

11,348

7,624

18,997

5,485

21,212

8,585

16,750

12,770

11,625

IDEAL“H”

114,395

10,873

6,960

16,264

4,900

18,248

8,300

13,750

11,035

11,305

MEDIUM“M”

101,635

9,699

6,850

15,553

4,900

16,764

8,160

11,725

9,910

11,045

BASIC“L”

94,606

8,807

6,679

12,384

5,233

15,781

7,639

11,801

11,535

10,022

SCHEME0

89,880

BLOCK LIST

DINING ROOM (3 BLOCKS)

MAIN DINING

LS DINING

KITCHEN

LIBRARY (3 BLOCKS)

TECHNOLOGY (3 BLOCKS)

SCIENCE (3 BLOCKS)

ART (3 BLOCKS)

MUSIC (3 BLOCKS)

THEATER (4 BLOCKS)

BLACK BOX THEATER

MAIN THEATER

THEATER BACK OF HOUSE

SCENERY SHOP

GYM (5 BLOCKS)

GYM X 3

LOCKERS / SHOWERS

TRAINING / FITNESS

OUTDOOR PLAY (3 CARDS)

FILL IN THE BLANK

LOBBY (1 BLOCK)

ADMINISTRATION (2 BLOCKS)

LOWER SCHOOL (5 BLOCKS)

KINDERGARTEN

1ST GRADE

2ND GRADE

3RD GRADE

4TH GRADE

LS CENTER (1 BLOCK)

MIDDLE SCHOOL (4 BLOCKS)

5TH GRADE

6TH GRADE

7TH GRADE

8TH GRADE

MS CENTER (1 BLOCK)

UPPER SCHOOL (4 BLOCKS)

US ENGLISH

US MATH

US HISTORY

US FOREIGN LANGUAGES

US CENTER (1 BLOCK)

LOW

ER SCHOOL

MIDDLE

SCHOOL

UPPER SCHOOLSCIE

NCESPECIALSLIB

RARYATHLE

TICSDIN

ING

ADMINIS

TRATION

0 SF 5,000 SF 10,000 SF 15,000 SF 20,000 SF

ADMINISTRATION

EXISTING9,608 SF

PROVIDED8,807 SF

L M H

DINING

EXISTING5,758 SF

PROVIDED6,679SF

L M H

SCIENCE

EXISTING6,003 SF

PROVIDED7,639 SF

L MH

UPPER SCHOOL

EXISTING7,607 SF

PROVIDED11,801 SF

L M H

MIDDLE SCHOOL

EXISTING7,661 SF

PROVIDED11,535 SF

L M H

LOWER SCHOOL

EXISTING8,290 SF

PROVIDED10,022 SF

LM H

LIBRARY

EXISTING4,354 SF

PROVIDED5,223 SF

L/M H

SPECIALS

EXISTING14,224 SF

PROVIDED15,781 SF

L M H

ATHLETICS

EXISTING15,553 SF

PROVIDED12,384 SF

L M H

CONNECT WEST END PLAZA TO PLATTEN HALL

scheme programmatic comparisons

scheme cost breakdown

54

Microsoft Mid-Atlantic HeadquartersSmithGroup - 2009IIDA Mid-Atlantic 2010 Silver Award Winner

pantry/lounge space under construction

conference room under construction

SmithGroup won the commission to complete the interior design and build out of Microsoft’s new 120,000 sf Mid-Atlantic Headquarters just outside of Washington DC. The project schedule was very aggressive in order to correspond with the expiring lease that Microsoft held for their current space.

I joined the team in January of 2009, near the end of the design development stage of the project, and worked on

the project through its substantial completion in July of 2009. I worked on all parts of the project, from design, construction documents, millwork design, finish selection, construction administration, contractor and client meetings, consultant coordination, and quality control and punchlisting. Near the beginning of construction, almost half of the project team was laid off, including the project architect. Working with the project manager and design principal, I picked up many of the responsibilities left vacant by the personnel losses.

I was charged with the design of a number of millwork pieces for the space. The largest of these was a bar/hub piece that would serve as a focal point in the lounge spaces on each floor. Different colored backlit glasses were used as identifying elements for each floor.

photos courtesy of Max Mackenzie

56

bar/hub detail

bar/hub

58

Reston Heights EastSmithGroup2007-2008

Reston Heights is a one million sq. ft. mixed use office and retail development in Reston, Virginia. The biggest complications of the project were the developer’s desires to create architecture that works at 2 scales. The scale of the highway needed to be addressed along the north of the site, which backed up to the Dulles Toll Road, a major artery serving Dulles International Airport. On the interior of the site, the project needed to address the human scale and create a destination for retail.

To further constrain the site, suburban parking counts required parking for over 3000 cars. We overcame this problem by utilizing the slope of the site and continuing the ground datum from the west over the service road and onto the green roofs of the retail component.

The office building design reflects both the desire to maximize rentable space and market desirability while trying to create an iconic architecture highly visible to the “river of cars” flowing directly by it. Color became the team’s tool for creating a striking architecture without playing significantly with the building footprint. Different colored glasses and treatments of shadow boxes differentiates the three office towers, but at the end of the conceptual design phase, the appearance of them remained up in the air.

site plan rendered by Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects

60

retail elevation

One of the main tasks that I was charged with was developing an architecture for the retail component of the project. An environmental theme incorporating geological ideas drawn from the landscape design by Nelson Byrd Woltz, and a desire to transition to a sleeker corporate architecture above, created the juxtaposed use of wood, stone gabion wall, and metal panels.

pavilion studies

early massing model

retail elevation

full retail elevation

office drop-off and retail

64

425 Eye St.SmithGroup2008-2009

425 Eye Street is an existing office building about two blocks from the Convention Center in Washington DC. The client chose SmithGroup to renovate the building, update finishes and mechanical systems, and re-skin the south and east facades.

This was the first project in the Workplace Studio to be completed entirely in Revit. I worked on or assisted with most aspects of the project in one capacity or another. These include conceptual sketching, Revit Model management, bathroom finish selection (the layouts were, for the most part, existing) modelling in Revit, redlines, detailing, elevator cab design, and miscellaneous rendering. I was the main contact on the team for managing and troubleshooting the Revit model

I was one of 4 people working on this project. I joined the project team at the beginning of the implementation of Revit. A preliminary schematic design had been completed in 2006. Many features of the original schematic package were changed when the project was revisited.

before

after - professional rendering

elevator cab refi nishing studies

66

1ST FLOOR46' - 6"

CONC. PAVERS ON SETTING BED

NEW SLAB ON GRADE

3-5/8" METAL STUD W/5/8" GWB W/ INS-1

NEW CONC. SLABOVER INS-5

EXIST. CONC. SLAB AND FOUNDATION WALL

MP-1

1' - 8 1/2" 1' - 3 1/2"

BOND BEAM. SEE STRUC.

REBAR. SEE STRUC.

CMU

PROTECTION BOARD

EXISTING CONC. CURB TO BE REMOVED

1' - 3"

2"

COMPACTEDGRADE

S

VA

RIE

S -

CO

OR

D W

/ WIN

DO

W S

CH

ED

ULE

6"

PREFORMED ALUM. SILL

INS-1

MP-1 BEYOND

MP-1 JOINT BEYOND

1

curtain wall at grade detail

1ST FLOOR46' - 6"

CONC. PAVERS ON SETTING BED

NEW SLAB ON GRADE

3-5/8" METAL STUD W/5/8" GWB W/ INS-1

NEW CONC. SLABOVER INS-5

EXIST. CONC. SLAB AND FOUNDATION WALL

MP-1

1' - 8 1/2" 1' - 3 1/2"

BOND BEAM. SEE STRUC.

REBAR. SEE STRUC.

CMU

PROTECTION BOARD

EXISTING CONC. CURB TO BE REMOVED

1' - 3"

2"

COMPACTEDGRADE

S

VA

RIE

S -

CO

OR

D W

/ WIN

DO

W S

CH

ED

ULE

6"

PREFORMED ALUM. SILL

INS-1

MP-1 BEYOND

MP-1 JOINT BEYOND

11'

- 0"

1' - 6" 1' - 6"

3' -

0"10

"5"

MP-1

5/8" GWB ON 3-5/8"MTL STUDS W/ SEMI-RIGIDFOIL FACED INSULATION.

SEAL ALL AIR BARRIERPENETRATIONS

FRAMING AS REQUIREDTO SUPPORT METAL PANEL

1' -

0"

AIR/WATER BARRIER

WW-1

ALUM. SILLEXTENSION BELOW

S

E.O. CMUWALL BELOW

5/8" GWB ON2 1/2" METAL STUDS

S

ROOF125' - 6"

2' -

6"

2' -

4 1/

2"4

1/2"

2' -

10 1

/2"

S

5"

3' -

6"

WRAP SHEETMEMBRANE FLASHINGUNDER ALUM. COPING

SLOPE

MTL PANEL COPING

LAP 2" MIN.

CONT. CLEAT

SHEATHING

STL. CHANNEL. SEE STRUC.

MEMBRANE FLASHING

CANT

PT WD BLOCKING

ROOFING OVER TAPEREDINSULATION

INS-3

INS-1

T.O. PARAPET

1' - 9"

3' - 1 1/4"

ALUM. CURTAINWALLSYSTEM

6" METAL STUDS W/ 1/2"EXTERIOR SHEATING ON

BOTH SIDES

ALUM. INFILL PANEL - PTD

ALUM. INFILL PANEL - PTD

EXIST. CONC.SLAB

L SUPPORT ANDKICKERSSEE STRUC.

PREFORMED ALUM.BLIND POCKET

STL. ANGLESEE STRUC.

ALUM.CLOSURE PANEL BYWINDOW SUPPLIER

column cladding detail

curtain wall detail

Drawings,Sketches,

etc.

Drawings,Sketches,

etc.

70

Sketchbook: Italy

These sketches and studies were completed in Florence, Rome, Vicenza, Venice, and Como on a 6 week trip during the summer of 2006. Emphasis was placed on the use of sketching to better understand and diagram the experiences of spaces and buildings.

72

Process Sketches

windmill sketches for prongorn tracking center - 2009academicopposite page - above and right

sketches for a mixed-use apartment building in Baltimore - 2006academicbelow

migrant worker/thinker sketches - 2009academicopposite page - bottom left

74

Hand Rendering

76

78

ipods

Digital Rendering

apartment building

sunlit room

80

conceptual buildinghybrid render and line

curr

icul

umvi

tae

Work Experience references available upon request

Peter Gluck and Partners, Architects | New York, NY | June. 2011 - Dec. 2011Intern Architect

Worked on the programming and strategic planning phases for the expansion and renovation of a 135,000 sq. ft private school in New York City.

Participated in many aspects of the design process: graphic design and infographic creation test fit design presentation development model building

SmithGroup | Washington, DC | Aug. 2007 - Aug. 2009Intern Architect

Worked on the conceptual design of a 1 million square foot office and retail development, the renovation and reskinning of an existing office building, and the IIDA award winning interior design and fit out of 4 floors of a high end office building.

Participated in all aspects of the design process: conceptual modelling and sketching construction documentation rendering client, consultant, and contractor meetings construction administration

Spearheaded the implimentation of Autodesk Revit software within SmithGroup’s workplace studio

The University of Texas | School of Architecture| Austin, Texas | Jan. 2010 - PresentDesign II | Design AssistantVisual Communications | Teaching Assistant

Assist in teaching 1st year architecture students the basics of design, drawing techniques, rendering, and drafting

IO central | Austin, Texas | Jan. 2009 - Dec 2010Staff Member

Taught introductory Revit coursesProvided technical support and maintained digital technologies such as laser cutters and 3d printers

Education2009 - PresentUniversity of Texas - AustinMaster of Architecture | May 20123.85 GPA

2003-2007University of Maryland - College ParkBachelor of Science of Architecture | May 2007Graduated Summa Cum Laude Award for Academic Achievement at the Baccalaureate Level

AwardsSelected Works 2010 chosen as a blurb.com Editor’s pick portfolioUTSOA Vertical Studio Design Excellence NomineeIIDA Mid Atlantic 2010 Silver Award for Microsoft Mid-Atlantic Headquarters (SmithGroup) 1st place award- National Building Museum Inter-School Student Design Competition CharretteRecipient of the Joy & Morin Scott/Sally & John Byram Graduate Fellowship Recipient of the University of Maryland School of Architecture Faculty Scholarship

SkillsHand -

Digital -

Languages - Fluent in Spanish

sketching | physical modelling | rendering [graphite. colored pencil. marker. watercolor]

Revit | Autocad | Sketchup | Rhino | Photoshop Illustrator | Indesign | 3dsmax | Kerkythea | Processing | Partworks 2D/3D

Ross [email protected]

303 W 40th St. Apt. 108Austin, TX 78705

84Selected WorksRoss Galloway

Selected Works2012Selected Works

Documents

Selected Works 2012