Upload
vagoul
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Segers Et Al Erratum 2010
1/2
Erratum
Erratum to Protean and boundaryless careers: A study on
potential motivators
[Journal of Vocational Behavior 37 (2) (2008) 212230]
Jesse Segers a,, Ilke Inceoglu c,1, Danil Vloeberghs b,2, Dave Bartram c,1, Erik Henderickx b,2
a Management Department, Faculty of Applied Economics, City-Campus-Ofce Z508, Kipdorp 61, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgiumb Management Department, Faculty of Applied Economics, City-Campus-Ofce Z504, Kipdorp 61, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgiumc SHL Group Ltd., The Pavilion, 1 Atwell Place, Thames Ditton, Surrey KT7 0NE, UK
In the recent study by Segers, Inceoglu, Vloeberghs, Bartram and Henderickx (2008) [Protean and boundaryless careers: A
study on potential motivators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 212230] a miscoding and a methodological inaccuracy were
detected. This note corrects these errors. Although a large majority of the ndings remained the same, the miscoding and
methodological inaccuracy had three consequences. In terms of the ten (sub)hypotheses, eight had the same outcome. Two (sub)
hypotheses related to gender were supported in the current analysis, but two others were not. Women scored as expected again
higher on values-driven motivation (=.09, pb .001) and psychological mobility motivation (=.13, pb .001). Women
scored, however, higher on self-directed motivation than men (=.08,pb .001), while in the original analysis, in line with the
hypothesis, there was no gender effect. Gender was no longer a predictor of physical mobility, while initially it was hypothesized
and found that men scored higher than women. Second, the cultural dimensions of Hofstede (1980) had a different in uence on
values-driven motivation, self-directed motivation, and psychological motivation than in the initial analysis. Values-driven
motivation was in this study not only predicted by low masculinity (=.28,pb .001), but also by high power distance (=.04,
pb .001). Low power distance remained a positive predictor for self-directed motivation (=.15,pb .001), but low masculinity
was replaced by low individualism (=.07, pb .001). Finally, for psychological mobility the reverse was observed. Low
masculinity remained a positive predictor (=.17,pb .001), but low individualism was replaced by low masculinity (=.17,
pb .001). Third, again four clusters emerged out of the data-set. Two clusters were similar to the initial ones, namely, Trapped/lost
(low on all four motivational dimensions) and Hired gun/hired hand(only low on the values-driven motivation). The two other
clusters changed. The initial Protean career architect cluster no longer had medium to high scores on physical mobility
motivation, therefore it was labeled Solid citizen. The initial Curious/Wanderer cluster no longer had high scores on
psychological mobility motivation, therefore it was labeled Wanderer. SeeTable 1for a more detailed comparison of the clusters
found in the two studies.
Journal of Vocational Behavior 77 (2010) 154155
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Vocational Behaviorj o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / j v b
http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00018791http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00018791http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-8/13/2019 Segers Et Al Erratum 2010
2/2